You are on page 1of 63

ANSI c63.

4-1991
(Revieionof ANSI C63.4-lSee)

American National Standard for


Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions
from Low-VoltageElectrical and Electronic
Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz

Accredited Standards Committee On Electromagnetic Compatibility, C63


accredited by the
American National Standards Institute

Secretariat
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

Approved January 17,1991


American National Standards Institute
~~~ ~ ~ ~

Abstract: ANSI C63.4-1991, American National Standard Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise


Emissions From Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz,
sets forth uniform methods of measurement of radio noise emitted from low-voltage electrical and
electronic equipment, including digital and other information technology equipment (ITE), in the
frequency range of 9 k H z to 40 GHz. Methods for the measurement of radiated and power-line-con-
ducted radio noise are covered and may be applied to any such equipment unless otherwise specified
by individual equipment requirements.
Keywords. conducting ground plane, conducted emission testing, digital equipment, electric field
measurement, information technology equipment (ITE), intentional radiators, line-impedance stabi-
lization network (LISN), low-voltage electrical equipment, low-voltage electronic equipment, mag-
netic field measurement, normalized site attenuation, periodic intentional radiators, power-
line-conducted radio noise, radiated emission testing, radio-noise emissions, radio-noise power, site
attenuation, unintentional radiators.

ISBN 1-55937-086-6

Copyright 0 1991 by

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.


345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017-2394,USA
No part of this publication m y be reproduced in any form,
in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of the publisher.
American National Standard

An American National Standard implies a consensus of those sub-


stantially concerned with its scope and provisions. An American
National Standard is intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer,
the consumer, and the general public. The existence of an American
National Standard does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether
he has approved the standard or not, from manufacturing, market-
ing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not con-
forming to the standard. American National Standards are subject to
periodic review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest editions.

CAUTION NOTICE: This American National Standard may be


revised or withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American
National Standards Institute require that action be taken to reaf-
firm, revise, or withdraw this standard no later than five years from
the date of publication. Purchasers of American National Standards
may receive current information on all standards by calling or writ-
ing the American National Standards Institute.

Published by

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.


345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017-2394,USA
Foreword
(This Foreword is not a part of ANSI C63.4-1991, American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Radio-
Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrid and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz.)

Almost from the beginning of radio broadcasting, the electric utility companies were faced with
problems of radio noise. In 1924 the National Electric Light Association appointed a committee to
study the subject. The manufacturers of electric power equipment had encountered similar prob-
lems, and in 1930, a subcommittee of the NEMA Codes and Standards Committee was set up. The
following year the EEI-NEMA-RMA Joint Coordination Committee on Radio Reception was orga-
nized.
The Joint Coordination Committee issued a number of reports, among which was Methods of Mea-
suring Radio Noise, 1940. This report included specifications for a radio-noise and field-strength
meter for the frequency band 0.15 MHz-18 MHz. The report recommended procedures for measur-
ing radio-noise voltage (conducted noise) from low- and high-voltage apparatus, making noise field-
strength measurements near overhead power lines, determining broadcast field strengths, and
collecting data upon which to base tolerable limits for radio noise.
During World War 11,the needs of the armed services for instruments and methods for radio-noise
measurement, particularly at frequencies higher than the broadcast band, became pressing and, in
1944, work on developing suitable specifications was begun by a special subcommittee of ASA Sec-
tional Committee C63, Radio-Electrical Coordination. This special subcommittee developed a war-
time specification which became Army-Navy Specification JAN-1-225 issued in 1945 and later
approved as C63.1-1946, American War Standard-Method of Measuring Radio Interference of Elec-
trical Components and Completed Assemblies of Electrical Equipment for the Armed Forces from
150 k H z to 20 MHz.
In 1951, ASA Sectional Committee C63, through its subcommittee No. 1on Techniques and Devel-
opments, started work on improving and extending measurement methods. This resulted in publica-
tion of the standard C63.4-1963, Radio-Noise Voltage and Radio-Noise Field Strength, 0.015 to
25 MHz, Low-Voltage Electric Equipment and NonelectricEquipment.
The standard (263.4-1963 was reaffirmed in 1969, and a revision was published in 1981, which
embraced a broader frequency range and incorporated newer measurement techniques that had
been developed within the USA and by the International Special Committee on Radio Interference
(CISPR).
Although many improvements had been made in Std C63.4 in the several revisions, the repro-
ducibility of measurements of radiated interference from one test site to another had not been com-
pletely satisfactory. In 1982 a concerted effort was organized in Subcommittee One of the American
National Standards Committee C63 to determine how the technique could be improved. Evidence
showed that the variability was due, in part, to inadequate (a) control of site ground plane conduc-
tivity, flatness, site enclosures, effects of surrounding objects, and certain other site construction fea-
tures, (b) accounting for antenna factors, associated cabling, and balun and device under test
characteristics and (c) consideration of mutual coupling effects between the device under test and
the receiving antenna and their images in the ground plane. Accordingly, Standard C63.4 was fur-
ther revised in 1988 and Standards C63.5, C63.6, and C63.7 were prepared to provide the additional
information.
In late 1988 and in 1989 the importance of including additional details on test procedures to pro-
vide proper evaluation of complex systems such as information technology equipment and systems
was recognized. Measurements on such systems can be quite sensitive to the exact configuration of
equipment units and interconnecting cables utilized. The present edition is the result of a major
effort on the part of the members of the Committee and various other participating individuals. To
expedite the work, the following members of the C63 Committee served as task group leaders to
address various issues:
Edwin L. Bronaugh Donald N. Heirman H. R. Hofmann
Ralph Calcavecchio Dan Hoolihan
At the time that the Accredited Standards Committee on Electromagnetic Compatibility, C63,
approved this standard, it had the following membership:

Ralph M. Showers, Chair Edwin L. Bronaugh, Vice Chair


Susan L. Vogel, Secretary
OrganizationRepresented Name of Representative
Aeronautical Radio, Inc. .............................................................................................................................. Mark w g l e y
Amador Corporation .................................................................................................................................... Dan Hoolihan
James Johnson
American Council of Independent Laboratories ........................................................................................ William K. Hayes
Association of American Railroads ............................................................................................................. Chris Allman
Association of TelecommunicationsAttorneys ........................................................................................... Jon Curtis
Glen Dash
ATLT Bell Laboratories .............................................................................................................................. H. R. Hofmann
Canadian Standards Association................................................................................................................ F. Diamente
Computer and Business Equipment Manufacturing Association............................................................. Ralph Calcavecchio
William F.Hanrahan
Electric Light and Power Group ................................................................................................................. Merrill Brimhall
William Logan
Matthew C. Mingoia
Electronic Industries Association ............................................................................................................... George Hanover
Eric Schimmel
Exchange Carriers Standards Association ................................................................................................. 0. J. Guaella, Jr.
John Lichtig
Michael Parente
Federal CommunicationsCommission ...................................................................................................... Richard Fabina
Art Wall
Food and Drug Administration ................................................................................................................... Paul Ruggera
Jeffrey Silberberg
GTE Service Corporation............................................................................................................................. Joe Villanueva
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc............................................................................... Edwin L.Bronaugh
Donald N. Heirman
Nestor Kolcio
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association ................................................................................................. Terry Rybak
National Association of Broadcasters ......................................................................................................... Michael C. Rau
Kelly Williams
National Electrical Manufacturers Association......................................................................................... Ronald Harrold
Stephen Hopper
National Institute of Standards and Technology ....................................................................................... Myron Crawford
National Telecommunicationsand Information Administration .............................................................. Karl Nebbia
Personal Computer ...................................................................................................................................... Bill Wong
Radio Technical Committee for Aeronautics.............................................................................................. Keith Kalanquin
ScientificApparatus Makers Association................................................................................................... Ray Magnuson
Lou Shulman
Society of Automotive Engineers ................................................................................................................ Frederick Bauer
Herbert Mertsl
Underwriters Laboratories.......................................................................................................................... Wolf Josenhans
Willard Tuthill
U.S.Air Force............................................................................................................................................... Charles Seth
US.Department of Agriculture, Rural Electrification Administration ................................................... Dante Anoia
US.Department of Energy -Bonneville Power Administration ............................................................ Vernon L. Chartier
U.S.Department of Energy -Western Area Power Administration ...................................................... Pete Haneon
US. Department of the Army, CommunicationsElectronic Command ................................................... David &field
U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Electronic System Naval Command.............................................. Stephen Caine
U.S. Department of Transportation -Federal Aviation Administration ................................................ Robert Frazier
Members-at-Large ....................................................................................................................................... Louie Slesin
Herman Garlan
Harold Gauper
L. Robert Glenn
Leonard Milton
Richard Schulz
Ralph M. Showem
Chester L. Smith
Leonard W.Thomas, Sr.
Contents
PAGE
SECTION
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 9
1.1 Scope........................................................................................................................................... 9
1.2 Applications ............................................................................................................................... 9

2. References........................................................................................................................................... 10

3. Definitions .......................................................................................................................................... 11

4. Measurement Instrumentation ......................................................................................................... 13 --


4.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 13
4.1.1 Measuring Instruments ............................................................................................. 13
4.1.1.1 Reference Receiver .................................................................................... 13
4.1.1.2 Spectrum Analyzer.................................................................................... 13
4.1.2 Line Impedance Stabilization Network (LISN)........................................................ 13
4.1.3 Voltage Probes ............................................................................................................ 13
4.1.4 Current Probes ........................................................................................................... 14
4.1.5 Antennas .................................................................................................................... 16
4.1.5.1 Magnetic Field Measurements (9 kHz-30 MHz)..................................... 16
4.1.5.2 Electric Field Measurements (9 kHz-30 MHz) ....................................... 16
4.1.5.3 Electric Field Measurements (30 MHz-1000 MHz) ................................ 16
4.1.5.4 Electric Field Measurements (1-40 GHz) ................................................ 16
4.1.6 Absorbing Clamp ........................................................................................................ 17
4.2 Detector Function/Selections of Bandwidth ............................................................................. 17
4.3 Receiver Monitoring .................................................................................................................. 17
4.4 Calibration of Measuring Equipment....................................................................................... 17
4.4.1 Antenna Calibration ................................................................................................... 17
4.4.2 LISN Calibration ........................................................................................................ 18
4.4.3 Absorbing Cable Clamp Calibration .......................................................................... 18
4.4.4 Cable Calibration ....................................................................................................... 18

5 . Test Facilities ..................................................................................................................................... 18


5.1 General Requirements .............................................................................................................. 18
5.1.1 Power Source .............................................................................................................. 18
5.1.2 Ambient Radio Noise and Signals ............................................................................. 18
5.2 Conducted Emission Test Site Requirements .......................................................................... 18
5.2.1 Conducting Ground Plane .......................................................................................... 18
5.2.2 Vertical Conducting Surface ...................................................................................... 19
5.2.3 Line Impedance Stabilization Network Installation ................................................ 19
5.2.4 Voltage Probe .............................................................................................................. 19
5.3 Radiated Emission Test Site Requirements for Measurements Below 30 MHz .................... 19
5.4 Radiated Emission Test Site Requirements for Measurements 30 MHz to 1GHz................19
5.4.1 Reference Test Site ..................................................................................................... 19
5.4.2 Alternate Test Sites .................................................................................................... 19
5.4.2.1 Shielded Enclosures .................................................................................. 20
5.4.3 Conducting Ground Plane .......................................................................................... 21
5.4.4 %mtable .................................................................................................................... 21
5.4.5 Validation Requirements ........................................................................................... 21
5.4.5.1 Site Attenuation ........................................................................................ 21
5.4.5.2 Normalized Site Attenuation Tolerance................................................... 22
SECTION PAGE

5.4.5.3 Theoretical Normalized Site Attenuation ................................................................. 22


5.4.5.4 Normalized Site Attenuation Measurement: Basic Procedures .............................. 22
5.4.5.5 Normalized Site Attenuation for Alternate Test Sites ............................................. 27
5.5 Radiated Emission Test Site Requirements Above 1GHz ...................................................... 30
5.6 Testing at Manufacturer's Location or User's Installation ..................................................... 30
5.7 Artificial Hand ........................................................................................................................... 31

6. General Equipment Configuration and Operating Conditions ....................................................... 32


6.1 General Arrangement of Equipment ........................................................................................ 32
6.2 Grounding .................................................................................................................................. 33
6.3 Special Instrumentation ........................................................................................................... 33
6.4 Shock and Vibration Isolators ................................................................................................... 33
6.5 Temperature and Humidity ...................................................................................................... 33
6.6 Equipment Operating Conditions............................................................................................. 33

7. Conducted Emission Testing ............................................................................................................. 33


7.1 Measurement Requirements..................................................................................................... 34
7.2 Test Procedures .......................................................................................................................... 34
7.2.1 Measurements at a Test Site ..................................................................................... 34
7.2.2 On-Site Conducted Emission Tests ........................................................................... 34
7.2.3 Preliminary Conducted Emission Tests .................................................................... 34
7.2.4 Final Conducted Emission Tests ............................................................................... 37

8. Radiated Emission Testing ................................................................................................................ 37


8.1 Measurement Requirements..................................................................................................... 37
8.2 Antenna Selection and Location ............................................................................................... 37
8.2.1 Magnetic Field Radiated Emissions .......................................................................... 37
8.2.2 Electric Field Radiated Emissions Below 30 MHz ................................................... 37
8.2.3 Electric Field Radiated Emissions, 30 MHz to 1GHz .............................................. 37
8.2.4 Electric Field Radiated Emissions, 1GHz to 40 GHz .............................................. 40
8.3 Test Procedures .......................................................................................................................... 42
8.3.1 Measurements on a Test Site..................................................................................... 42
8.3.1.1 Preliminary Radiated Emission Tests ...................................................... 42
8.3.1.2 Final Radiated Emission Tests ................................................................. 42
8.3.2 On-Site Measurements .............................................................................................. 43

9. Radio-noise power ............................................................................................................................. 43


9.1 Absorbing Clamp Measurement Procedures ............................................................................ 43

10. Test Reports ........................................................................................................................................ 44


10.1 Test Report Content ................................................................................................................... 44
10.1.1 Applicable Standards ................................................................................................. 44
10.1.2 Equipment Units Tested ............................................................................................ 44
10.1.3 Equipment and Cable Configuration ........................................................................ 44
10.1.4 List of Test Equipment .............................................................................................. 44
10.1.5 Units of Measurement ............................................................................................... 45
10.1.6 Location of Test Site ................................................................................................... 45
10.1.7 Measurement Procedures .......................................................................................... 45
10.1.8 Reporting Measurement Data ................................................................................... 45
10.1.8.1 Conducted Emission Data ........................................................................ 45
10.1.8.2 Radiated Emission Data ........................................................................... 45
10.1.9 General and Special Conditions ................................................................................ 45

.
PAGE
SECTION

10.1.10 Summary of Results ................................................................................................... 45


10.1.11 Required Signatures................................................................................................... 45
10.1.12 Test Report Appendixes ............................................................................................. 46
10.2 Test Report Disposition ............................................................................................................. 46
11. Measurement of Information Technology Equipment (ITE)............................................................ 46
11.1 General Requirements for ITE ................................................................................................. 46
11.1.1 Operating Conditions ................................................................................................. 46
11.1.2 Interface Ports ............................................................................................................ 46
11.1.3 Modular Equipment ................................................................................................... 46
11.1.4 Simulators................................................................................................................... 47
11.1.5 Hosts ........................................................................................................................... 47
11.1.6 Peripherals .................................................................................................................. 47
11.1.7 Interface Cables .......................................................................................................... 47
11.1.8 Remotely Located Devices.......................................................................................... 47
11.1.8.1 Communications Network Connections ................................................... 47
11.1.9 ~ i s u aDisplay
l Units .................................................................................................. 47
11.2 System Arrangements ............................................................................................................... 47
11.2.1 Table-Top Equipment ................................................................................................. 48
11.2.1.1 Placement of Host ..................................................................................... 48
11.2.1.2 Placement of Monitors and Keyboards .................................................... 48
11.2.1.3 Placement of External Peripherals .......................................................... 48
11.2.1.4 Cable Placement ........................................................................................ 48
11.2.1.5 Cable Manipulation ................................................................................... 48
11.2.2 Floor-Standing Equipment ........................................................................................ 48
11.2.2.1 Overhead Cable Trays and Suspended Ceilings...................................... 49
11.2.2.2 Cable Manipulation ................................................................................... 49
11.2.2.3 Cable Placement ........................................................................................ 49
11.2.3 Combination Table-Top and Floor-Standing Equipment ......................................... 49
11.3 Final Tests.................................................................................................................................. 49
11.3.1 Final Conducted Emission Measurements ............................................................... 49
11.3.2 Final Radiated Emission Measurements ................................................................. -50

12. Measurements of Intentional Radiators ........................................................................................... 50

13. Measurements of Unintentional Radiators ...................................................................................... 50

14. Measurements of Periodic Intentional Radiators ............................................................................ 50

15. Limit Relaxation for Transients ........................................................................................................ 50

16. Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................... 50

FIGURES

Fig 1 Impedance Characteristic of LISN: 10 kHz to 30 MHz ........................................................... 14


Fig 2 Circuit Diagram of LISN to Provide Impedance of Fig 1 for the 0.15MHz to 30 MHz
Frequency Range .................................................................................................................... 15
Fig 3 Circuit Diagram of LISN to Provide Impedance of Fig 1for the 10 kHz to 150 kHz
(30MHz) Frequency Range ...................................................................................................... 15
Fig 4 Line Probe for Tests at User’s Installation .............................................................................. 16
Fig 5 Emission Measurement Obstruction-Free Area for Site with a Turntable............................ 20
FIGURES PAGE

Fig 6 Site Attenuation . Horizontal Polarization............................................................................ 27


Fig 7 Site Attenuation -Vertical Polarization Using Tuned Dipole Antennas ............................. 28
Fig 8 Typical Antenna Positions for Alternate Test Site .................................................................. 29
Fig 9 Test Platform for Table-Top Equipment (Top View)................................................................. 32
Fig 10 Test Configuration ..................................................................................................................... 35
Fig 11 Test Configuration for Floor-Standing Equipment (Cables at or Below Floor Level) ...........40
Fig 12 Test Configuration for Floor-Standing Equipment (Overhead Cables).................................. 41
Fig 13 Test Configuration for Combination Floor-Standing and Table-Top Equipment
(Cables at or Below Floor Level)............................................................................................... 41
Fig 14 Test Configuration for Radio-Noise Power Measurement ....................................................... 44

TABLES

Table 1 Normalized Site Attenuation (Recommended Geometries for Broadband Antennas) .........23
Table 2 Normalized Site Attenuation (Recommended Geometries for Tunable Dipoles and for
Broadband Antennas on Alternate Test Sites. Horizontal Polarization) .............................. 24
Table 3 Normalized Site Attenuation (Recommended Geometries for Tunable Dipoles. Vertical
Polarization) .............................................................................................................................. 25
Table 4 Mutual Coupling Correction Factors for Geometry Using Resonant Tunable Dipoles
Spaced Three M Apart ............................................................................................................. 26

APPENDMES

Appendix A Site Attenuation Using Discrete Frequencies ................................................................. 52


Appendix B Site Attenuation Using Swept Frequencies .................................................................... 55
Appendix C Site Attenuation Deviations ............................................................................................. 56
Appendix D Method of Preliminary Radiated Emission Maximization ............................................. 57
Appendix E Step-by-Step Guidance for Testing Personal Computers and Associated
Peripherals ........................................................................................................................ 58
Appendix F Verification of LISN Characteristics................................................................................ 61
Appendix G Absorbing Clamp .............................................................................................................. 63

APPENDIX FIGURES

Fig A1 Site Attenuation Worksheet...................................................................................................... 53


Fig A2 Measurement of LISN Insertion Loss ..................................................................................... .54

APPENDIX TABLE

Table A1 Example of Worksheet Entries.............................................................................................. 54


American National Standard for
Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions
from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic
Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz

1. Introduction be used, for example, to test small hand-held


electronic devices such as portable lap-top com-
1.1 Scope. This standard sets forth uniform puters, as well as to test larger equipment
methods of measurement of radio noise emitted units such as electronically controlled gas sta-
from low-voltage electrical and electronic tion pumps or ensembles of computers such as
equipment, including digital and other infor- might be found serving a banking or insurance
mation technology equipment UTE), in the fre- center. Other procedures may be used in cer-
quency range of 9 kHz t o 40 GHz. Methods for tain instances provided the methods used yield
the measurement of radiated and power-line- results that are expected to be the same as the
conducted radio noise are covered and may be results that would be obtained using the proce-
applied to any such equipment unless other- dures contained in this standard. In the event
wise specified by individual equipment require- of any dispute, the results of tests performed in
ments. accordance with the procedures described
These methods are not currently intended for herein will prevail over the results of tests per-
measurement of deliberately radiated energy, formed using other methods. Any persons con-
such as that from intentional emitters, nor is templating using other procedures may want to
t h i s s t a n d a r d intended for certification/ determine, before performing the alternate pro-
approval of avionic equipment, except where cedures, that those alternate procedures are
specifically referenced. Methods of measure- acceptable to the appropriate agency or procur-
ment of various types of intentional emitters ing organization requiring the testing.
are under consideration. This standard, having rather broad applica-
These methods apply to the measurement of bility, contains clauses that may be selectively
individual units or systems comprised of units. incorporated in a specific product requirement.
Additional methods may be added to this stan- Any procurement or regulatory requirement
dard to fulfill future requirements as needed. should contain the following information:
The methods used for validation of test sites (1) Limits and frequency ranges for both
such as open area sites and absorber-lined conducted and radiated measurements
rooms for frequencies in the range of 30-1000 (2) For radiated measurements, limits and
MHz are contained in this standard. Further test distances
work on absorber-lined room validation is (3) A specific affirmative statement if any or
under consideration. An effort has been made, all of the following are required:
wherever possible, to harmonize the measure- (a) Radiated magnetic field strength
ment procedures contained herein with those measurements below 30 MHz (see
in effect internationally. 8.2.1)
(b) Radiated electric field strength mea-
1.2 Applications. The procedures contained surements below 30 MHz (see 8.2.2)
herein are to be used for determining compli- (c) Use of the absorbing clamp as a sub-
ance of a wide variety of equipment with appli- stitute for measuring radiated field
cable standards for that equipment. They may strength (see Section 9)

9
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

(d) Use of a 5 pH line-impedance stabi- ances, Portable Tools and Similar Electrical
lization network (LISN) (see 4.1.2) Apparatus2
(e) Current rather than voltage mea-
surements (see 4.1.4) [6] CISPR Publication 16 (19871, CISPR Speci-
(0 Relaxation of the limits for clicks fication for Radio Interference Measuring
(transients) (see Section 15) Apparatus and Measurement Methods, 2nd ed.
(g) Artificial hand (see 5.7)
(4) Any requirements concerning the test [7] CISPR Publication 22 (19851, Limits and
facilities or test procedures used if the Methods of Measurement of Radio Interference
facilities or procedures do not fully com- Characteristics of Information Technology
ply with the requirements contained Equipment. (See also [B31.)3
herein
Where dimensioddistance tolerances are not [8]FCC 47 CFR Part 2, Frequency Allocation
specified, nominal tolerances are assumed, and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and
based upon good engineering practice. Regulations (19901.4
Wherever the word shall is used in this docu-
ment, it is considered to be mandatory. The [9] FCC 47 CFR Part 15, Radio Frequency
word should is advisory only. Devices (1990).

[lo] FCC/OET Bulletin 62, Understanding FCC


2. References Rules for Digital Devices (1988).

The following references shall form a part of [113 IEEE Std 100-1988, IEEE Standard Dic-
this standard to the extent that they are refer- tionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms -
enced herein. When American National Stan- 4th ed. (ANSI1.6
dards and IEEE Standards are superseded by
a revision, the revision shall apply. [12] IEEE Std 139-1988, IEEE Recommended
Practice for Measurement of Radio Frequency
[l] ANSI C63.2-1987, American National Stan- Emission from Industrial, Scientific, and Medi-
dard for Instrumentation-Electromagnetic cal (ISM) Equipment Installed on User's
Noise and Field Strength, 10 kHz to 40 GHz- Premises (ANSI).
Specifications.1
[13] IEEE Std 149-1979 (Reaff 19901, IEEE
[2] ANSI C63.5-1988, American National Stan- Standard Test Procedures for Antennas
dard for Calibration of Antennas Used for (ANSI).
Radiated Emission Measurements in Electro-
magnetic Interference (EMU Control. [14] IEEE Std 213-1987, IEEE Standard Proce-
dure for Measuring Conducted Emissions in
[3] ANSI C63.6-1988, American National Stan- the Range of 300 kHz to 25 MHz from Televi-
dard Guide for the Computation of Errors in sion and FM Broadcast Receivers to Power
Open-Area Test Site Measurements. Lines.

[4] ANSI C63.7-1988, American National Stan- ~

2CISPR publications are available from the Interna-


dard Guide for Construction Of Open Area Test tional Electrotechnical Commission, 3 rue de Varembb,
Sites for Performing
- Radiated Emission Mea- Case Postale 131. CH-1211. Genbve 20. Switzerland/
surements. Suisse. In the Us,'CISPR publications are' available from
the Sales Department, American National Standards Insti-
tute.
[5] CISPR Publication 14 (19851, Limits and 3Bracketed numbers preceded by B correspond lo those
Methods of Measurement of Radio Interference of the Bibliographyin Section 16.
Characteristics of Household Electrical Appli- 4For information on how to purchase FCC publications,
contact the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Govern-
ment Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.
1ANSI publications are available from the Sales SIEEE publications are available from the Institute of
Department, American National Standards Institute, Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Service Center, 445
1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. Hoes Lane, P.O. Box 1331, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331.

10
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

[15] IEEE Std 291-1969 (Reaff 19811, IEEE (2) The factor for electric field strength is not necessarily
the same as the factor for the magnetic field strength.
Standards Report on Measuring Field Strength (3) The antenna factor as determined in ANSI C63.5-
in Radio Wave Propagation. 1988 [2] is very nearly equal to the free-space antenna
factor.
[161 IEEE Std 302-1969 (Reaff 1981>,Standard
Methods for Measuring Electromagnetic Field click. A disturbance of a duration less than a
Strength for Frequencies Below 1000 MHz in specified value when measured under specified
Radio Wave Propagation.6 conditions.
NOTE: For the specified values and conditions, guidance
[17] IEEE Std 376-1975 (Reaff 19811, IEEE may be found in CISPR Publications 14 (1985) [51, 16
(1987)161, and 22 (1985)[71.
Standard for the Measurement of Impulse
Strength and Impulse Bandwidth (ANSI).
conducted emissions test site. A site meet-
[18] IEEE Std 474-1973 (Reaff 19821, IEEE ing specified requirements suitable for measur-
Standard Specifications and Test Methods for ing radio interference voltages and currents
Fixed and Variable Attenuators, DC to 40 GHz emitted by an equipment under test (EUT).
(ANSI).
conducting ground plane. A conducting flat
[19] MIL-STD-45662 (rev. A, 8/1/88), Military surface or plate that is used as a common refer-
Standard Calibration Systems Requirements.7 ence point for circuit returns and electric or
signal potentials, and that reflects electromag-
netic waves.

3. Definitions digital device. An information technology


equipment (ITE) that falls into the class of
The definitions in IEEE Std 100-1988 [Ill*, unintentional radiators that uses digital tech-
unless otherwise noted below, apply through- niques and generates and uses timing signals
out this document. Definitions in particular or pulses at a rate in excess of 9000 pulses per
product standards or in applicable regulations second.
take precedence.
(electromagnetic) disturbance. Any electro-
ambient level. The values of radiated and magnetic phenomenon that may degrade the
conducted signal and noise existing at a spe- performance of a device, equipment, or system,
cific test location and time when the test sam- or adversely affect living or inert matter.
ple is not activated. NOTE: An electromagnetic disturbance may be a noise, an
unwanted signal, or a change in the propagation medium
itself,
antenna factor. A factor that, when properly
applied to the meter reading of the measuring (electromagnetic) emission. The phe-
instrument, yields the electric field strength in nomenon by which electromagnetic energy
volts/meter or the magnetic field strength in emanates from a source.
amperedmeter.
NOTES: (1)This factor includes the effects of antenna equipment under test (EUT).A device or
effective length and mismatch and may include trans- system used for evaluation that is representa-
mission line losses. tive of a product to be marketed.

floor-standing equipment. Equipment


designed to be used directly in contact with the
6IEEE Std 302-1969 has been withdrawn; however, floor, or supported above the floor on a surface
copies can be obtained from the Stnadards Department,
IEEE Service Center. designed to support both the equipment and
7MIL publications are available from the Director, US. the operator (e.g., a raised computer floor).
Navy Publications and Printing Service, Eastem Division,
700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111. host. A device to which other devices (periph-
eThe numbers in brackets correspond to those of the ref-
erences in Section 2; when preceded by B, they correspond erals) are connected and which generally con-
to those of the Bibliography in Section 16. trols those devices.

11
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

incidental radiator. A device that produces personal computer. A system containing a


radio-frequency energy during the course of its host and a limited number of peripherals
operation, although the device is not intention- designed t o be used in the home or in small
ally designed t o generate or emit radio-fre- offices that enables individuals t o perform a
quency energy. Examples of incidental variety of computing or word processing func-
radiators a r e dc motors, mechanical light tions or both, and that typically is of a size per-
switches, etc. mitting it and its peripherals to be located on a
table surface.
information technology equipment UTE). NOTE: Other definitions given in product standards or
Unintentional radiator equipment designed for applicable regulations may take precedence.
one or more of the following purposes:
Receiving data from an external source power-line-conducted radio noise. Radio
(such as a data input line or via a key- noise produced by equipment operation that
board) exists on the power line of the equipment and
Performing some processing functions of is measurable under specified conditions.
the received data (such as computation, NOTE: It may enter a receptor, such as ITE, by direct mu-
data transformation or recording, filing, pling or by subsequent radiation from some circuit ele-
sorting, storage, transfer of data) ment.
Providing a data output (either to other
equipment or by the reproduction of data radiated emissions test site. A site meeting
or images) specified requirements suitable for measuring
NOTE: This definition includes electrical/electronic unita radio frequency fields radiated by an EUT.
or systems that predominantly generate a multiplicity of
periodic binary pulsed electricauelectronic waveforms and radiated radio noise. Radio-noise energy in
are designed to perform data proceasing functions such as
word processing, electronic computation, data transforma- the form of an electromagnetic field including
tion, recording,ffing, sorting, storage, retrieval and trans- both the radiation and induction components of
fer, and reproduction of data as images. the field.
intentional radiator. A device that intention- radio noise. An electromagnetic noise that
ally generates and emits radio-frequency may be superimposed upon a wanted signal
energy by radiation or induction. and is within the radio-frequency range. For
the purposes of this standard, an electromag-
line-impedance stabilization network
netic disturbance of a sinusoidal character is
(LISN).A network inserted in the supply also considered radio noise.
mains lead of apparatus to be tested which pro-
vides, in a given frequency range, a specified
site attenuation. The ratio of the power input
load impedance for the measurement of distur-
of a matched, balanced, lossless, tuned dipole
bance voltages, and which may isolate the
radiator t o that a t the output of a similarly
apparatus from the supply mains in that fre-
matched, balanced, lossless, tuned dipole
quency range. Syn: artificial mains network.
receiving antenna for specified polarization,
NOTE: An LISN unit may contain one or more individual separation, and heights above a flat reflecting
LISN circuits.
surface. It is a measure of the transmission
low-voltage electrical and electronic path loss between two antennas.
equipment. Electrical and electronic equip- NOTE: The above is the classical definition of site attenua-
ment with operating input voltages of up t o tion. In this document, it is extended to cover broadband
antennas as well as tuned dipole antennas.
600 Vdc or rms ac.
normalized site attenuation (NSA). Site system. An arrangement of interconnected
attenuation divided by the antenna factors of devices and their cables designed to perform a
the radiating and receiving antennas (all in lin- particular function or functions.
ear units).
table-top device. A device designed for and
peripheral device. A device connected t o normally placed on the raised surface of a
another device (host) that, in turn, controls its table; e.g., most personal computers are consid-
operation. ered to be table-top devices.

12
ANSI
ELECTRICALAND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

unintentional radiator. A device that gener- 4.1.1.2 Spectrum Analyzer. When a spec-
ates radio-frequency energy for use within the trum analyzer is used, it shall be provided with
device, or sends radio-frequencysignals by con- appropriate accessories to provide sufficient
duction to associated equipment via connecting sensitivity and overload protection to ensure
wiring, but which is not intended to emit radio- accurate, repeatable measurements of all emis-
frequency energy by radiation or induction. sions over the specified frequency range. The
autoscan limitations of 4.1.1.1also apply to
spectrum analyzers.
NOTES: (1) The accessories needed will depend upon the
specific measurement task and may include preamplifks
4. Measurement Instrumentation for improving sensitivity, filters and attenuators for over-
load protection, and additional quasi-peak detection cir-
cuits.
4.1 General. Use of proper measurement (2) Overload includes harmonic distortion, intennodula-
instrumentation is critical to obtaining accu- tion distortion, and gain compression of spectrum analyzer
input signals.
rate, reproducible results. Various measuring (3) If a post-detector filter is used, ita bandwidth shall be
accessories that may be needed depend upon wide enough BO as to not afFect peak detector readings.
the particular measurements t o be performed
as indicated below. 4.1.2 Line Impedance Stabilization Net-
4.1.1 Measuring Instruments. Measure- work (LISN). An LISN, sometimes also called
ments of radiated and ac power-line-conducted a n artificial mains network, having a n
radio noise shall be made with a measuring impedance characteristic within the limits
instrument conforming to ANSI C63.2-1987[ll shown in Fig 1 is required for conducted radio-
or with a spectrum analyzer. Where there is noise measurements. When the “measuring
disagreement on the results of a test, data instrument’’ port is terminated in 50 52, the
obtained with equipment conforming t o ANSI characteristic impedance in Fig 1 shall be pre-
C63.2-1987shall take precedence. sent at the “EUT”ports of the LISN. Figures 2
4.1.1.1 Reference Receiver. The refer- and 3 show two circuits that will provide the
ence receiver for measurements of radiated and specified impedance over the frequency ranges
ac power-line-conducted radio noise is a mea- of 0.15-30 MHz and 0.01-0.15 MHz, respec-
suring instrument conforming to ANSI C63.2- tively.
1987 [ll.Other instruments may be used for Where specific equipment requirements
certain restricted and specialized measure- specify another LISN, for example IEEE Std
ments when data so measured is correlated to 213-1987[14],that LISN shall be used.
a meter conforming to ANSI C63.2-1987.Auto- NOTE: The extension of the impedance characteristic
matic scan receivers may be used, but the max- shown in Fig 1 to 9 kKz is under consideration.
imum scan speed shall be limited by t h e
response time of the measuring system and the
4.1.3 Voltage Probes. A voltage probe may
repetition rate of the radio noise t o be mea- be used for radio-noise voltage measurements
sured so as to ensure that the level of each when measurements are made a t a user’s
emission is measured correctly, i.e., in accord- installation (see 5.6) or when the ac current
ance with a measurement with a non-scanning level exceeds the current-carrying capability of
receiver. Bandwidth and scan rates shall be commercially available LISNs. For such mea-
chosen that are appropriate for the frequencies surements, the method shown in Fig 4 may be
being scanned. used. Special precautions shall be taken t o
establish a reference ground for the measure-
NOTES (1) For quasi-peak detectors, the requirements ments. An LISN shall not be used in conjunc-
in C63.2-1987 are the eame as those in CISPR Publication
16 (1987) [61 for ”quasi-peak instrumenta”in Bands A, B, tion with a voltage probe for measurements at
C, and D. a user’s installation. The measurements are
(2) If the output of the quasi-peak or average detector is dependent on the impedance presented by the
indicated in decibels (dB)or other logarithmic units, the
logarithms shall be taken after the signal is detected and supply mains and may vary with time and loca-
the detector function is fully realized. Otherwise, instru- tion due to variations in the supply mains. (It
ments that uae logarithmic detactore or predetection loga- may be necessary t o perform repeated mea-
rithmic circuits or both shall include corrective circuita BO
that the output indication is the logarithm of the true aver- surements over a suitable period of time t o
age or quasi-peak value of the signal andor noise. determine the variation in measured values.

13
Fig 1
Impedance Characteristicof LISN
10 ~ H- Z
30 MHz

The time period shall be sufficient to cover all calibration factors shall be added to the mea-
significant variations due to operating condi- sured values. Measurements made with LISNs
tions at the installation.) Such measurement shall take precedence over measurements
results shall be regarded as unique t o that made with voltage probes.
EUT and installation environment. The mea- 4.1.4 Current Probes. A current probe that
surements shall be made between each cur- fits around each current-carrying conductor
rent-carrying conductor in the supply mains under test may be used when permitted t o
and the ground conductor with a blocking measure radio-noise currents (in lieu of radio-
capacitor (C)and a resistor (RI, shown in Fig 4, noise voltages) generated by the EUT.The
such that the total resistance between line and probe shall be immune to external fields, cali-
ground is 1500 51. Since the voltage probe brated, and used with the proper terminating
attenuates the radio-noise voltage, appropriate impedance. An LISN a s per 4.1.2 shall be

14
ANSI
C63.4-1991
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTFONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz

LI TO
TO POWER
EUT) 50pH SOURCE

--0.1
CI
pF -- c2
d-

I.0p.F

IN SOME LISNs, A SERIES RESISTANCE IS INCLUDED,


E.G., ClSPR PUB 16.

Fig 2
Circuit Diagram of LISN to Provide Impedance of Fig 1
for the 0.15 MHz to 30 MHz Frequency Range

To
EUT F

RI R3
TERM INAT 10N 1000 n on

-
-
’ IF CAREFULLY CONSTRUCTED, THIS NETWORK CAN BE
USED ABOVE 150 kHz TO AS HIGH AS 30 MHz.

Fig 3
Circuit Diagram of LISN to Provide Impedance of Fig 1
for the 10 kHz (30 MHz) Frequency Range

15

~ -~ __ ~
~ --
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENTOF RADIO-NOISEEMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

SUPPLY MAINS

I
(1500 -R)n

lxL>R
I 1
RADIO-

METER

Fig 4
Line Probe for Tests at User’s Installation

inserted between the EUT conductors and the polarized antennas as specified in ANSI C63.2-
mains outlet. The probe is placed between the 1987 111 shall be used to measure electric fields
EUT and the LISN as near the LISN as possi- in the frequency range 30 MHz-1000 MHz.
ble. An appropriate adapter may be fitted Tunable dipoles should be used. Alternatively,
between the EUT and the LISN to allow the a linearly polarized broadband antenna or a
current probe to be clamped on individual cur- dipole tuned only above 80 MHz, and set to the
rent-carrying conductors. If an appropriate 80 MHz tuned length when used between 30
LISN satisfying the current requirements of and 80 MHz, may be used in lieu of a tuned
the EUT is not commercially available, the dipole provided that the measurement can be
LISN may be eliminated and the current probe correlated with that made with a tuned dipole
placed between the EUT and the mains outlet. with an acceptable degree of accuracy. In case
4.1.5 Antennas. The use of specific antennas of dispute, data taken with a reference antenna
depends on the frequency range and field being or a tuned dipole calibrated in accordance with
measured in performing radiated emission ANSI C63.5-1988 121 shall take precedence.
measurements as indicated in 4.1.5.14.1.5.4. 4.1.5.4 Electric Field Measurements
4.1.5.1 Magnetic Field Measurements (1-40 GHz). Calibrated, linearly polarized
(9 kHz-30 MHz). Calibrated loop antennas as horn antennas as specified in ANSI C63.2-1987
specified in ANSI C63.2-1987 111 shall be used [ll shall be used. These include double-ridged
to measure magnetic fields in the frequency guide horns, rectangular waveguide horns,
range of 9 kHz-30 MHz. pyramidal horns, optimum gain horns, and
4.1.5.2 Electric Field Measurements (8 standard gain horns. The “beam” or major lobe
kHz-30 MHz). Calibrated monopole (rod) of the pattern of any antenna used shall be
antennas as specified in ANSI C63.2-1987 113 large enough to encompass the EUT when
and C63.5-1988 [23 shall be used t o measure located a t the measuring distance, or provi-
electric fields i n t h e frequency range of sions shall be made for “scanning” the EUT to
9 kHz-30 MHz. Generally, a 1.04 m (approxi- locate the direction or source of its radiated
mately 41 in) vertical monopole antenna is emissions. The aperture dimensions of these
used with or without a counterpoise as speci- horn antennas shall be small enough that the
fied by the manufacturer. measurement distance is equal to or greater
4.1.5.3 Electric Field Measurements than the Rayleigh Distance, i.e., R, = D2 / (2h),
(30 MHz-1000 MHz). Calibrated, linearly where D is the largest dimension of the aper-

16
ANSI
ELECTRICALAND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTIN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

ture of the antenna, and h is the free-space ual of the equipment. Normally a direct read-
wavelength in meters at the frequency of mea- ing measurement method is preferred. How-
surement. ever, signal substitution methods may be used
4.1.6 Absorbing Clamp. Measurements of provided it can be established that the results
radio-noise power, if required, are made with are equivalent to a properly calibrated direct
an absorbing clamp (see Section 9). reading method.
In addition to the measuring instrumenta-
4.2 Detector Function/Selection of Band- tion, cables, antennas, line impedance stabi-
width. Unless otherwise specified, radio-noise lization networks, voltage and current probes,
meters or spectrum analyzers shall have as the
etc., and the test facility are to be checked and
reference detector function a quasi-peak detec- calibrated as necessary on a regular basis t o
tor for frequencies up to and including 1 GHz.
ensure the accuracy of the test results, but no
For measurements above 1 GHz, peak and
less frequently than annually.
average detectors may be specified. Detector
All instrumentation shall be calibrated using
functions other than specified in ANSI C63.2-
secondary standards traceable to the National
1987 [l] may be used for making such mea- Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
surements, provided (1) d a t a so taken is or an equivalent standards reference organiza-
correlatable to data taken with the appropriate
tion. An example of a satisfactory calibration
detector and the associated instrument band-
system is given by MIL-STD-45662[191.
width, or (2) peak detector measured data may
4.4.1 Antenna Calibration. All antennas
be substituted for the appropriate detector data
shall be individually calibrated to show trace-
to show compliance if the peak level obtained
ability to NIST or an equivalent standards ref-
does not exceed the limit. The bandwidth used
erence organization. Antennas calibrated by
shall be equal to or greater than that specified
the methods given in ANSI C63.5-1988 121
in ANSI C63.2-1987.
meet the traceability requirements. Antenna
The measuring instrument shall satisfy the
factors shall be rechecked at least once a year,
following conditions:
by recalibration techniques or by checking
(1) The measuring instrumentation with
against reference antennas or known signal
either the quasi-peak, peak, or average
sources. Spot-checking during t h e period
detector shall have a linear response.
between calibrations is recommended.
(2) When measuring an emission with a low Antennas for use below 30 MHz shall be cali-
duty cycle, the dynamic range of the
brated using an acceptable method, such as one
measuring instrument shall not be
exceeded. of the methods in IEEE Std 291-1969 1151 or
IEEE Std 302-1969 [16].
NOTE: Use of bandwidths greater than those specified Antennas for use from 30 to 1000 MHz shall
may produce higher readings for certain types of emissions.
be calibrated using one of the methods speci-
4.3 Receiver Monitoring. All radio-noise fied in ANSI C63.5-1988 [23. Reference anten-
measurements shall be monitored using either nas shall be constructed as specified therein. It
a head-set, a loudspeaker, a spectrum display is strongly recommended that the reference
or any combination thereof as an aid to detect- antenna be spot-checked against other known
ing ambient signals and selecting frequencies antennas. If adjustable (tunable) dipole anten-
for which the amplitudes are highest with nas are used below 80 MHz while set at their
respect to the limit. Precautions shall be taken 80 MHz resonant length, they shall also be cal-
t o ascertain t h a t t h e use of a headset o r ibrated at that length for the range of frequen-
speaker does not affect the measuring instru- cies of use per ANSI C63.5-1988.
ment indication during measurements. Antennas for use at or above 1 GHz shall be
calibrated using an acceptable method, such as
4.4 Calibration of Measuring Equipment. one of the methods in IEEE Std 291-1969 [151
The calibration of the instrumentation shall be or IEEE 149-1979 [13]. The antenna used shall
checked frequently to assure its accuracy in be calibrated a t the measuring distance a t
accordance with requirements of ANSI C63.2- which it will be used.
1987 [ll. Adjustments shall be made and cor- NOTES: (1) If the antenna is calibrated at a distance L 2
rection factors applied in accordance with ' D2A,it may be used to make measurements at any dis-
instructions contained in the instruction man- tance greater than 2 D2/Awith an error of lass than 1 dB.

17
ANSI
C63.4- 1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

(2) Gain standard horn antennas (sometimes called stan- noise are not above the applicable limit, the
dard gain horn antennas) need not be calibrated beyond EUT shall be considered to be in accordance
that which is provided by the manufacturerunless (a) they
are damaged or deterioration is s y e c t e d , or 6)they are with the limit.
used at a distance closer than 2 D2h.Gain standard If the ambient field or the power-line ambi-
horn antennas have gains that are fmed by their dimen- ent level exceeds the applicable limit(s1, the fol-
sions and dimensional tolerances, and are most often used
for calibration of other antennas. lowing alternatives may be used
(1) In the case of radiated measurements,
4.4.2 LISN Calibration. The impedance perform measurements a t the closest
and attenuation of each LISN used in testing distance permitted by 5.4.1 and extrapo-
for conducted emissions is to be measured in late results t o the specified limit dis-
accordance with the procedure described in tance. The method of extrapolation shall
Appendix F. LISN impedance shall be cali- be justified and described in the test
brated at least once a year, and frequent spot- report.
checking is recommended. Where the LISN is (2) Perform measurements of critical fre-
permanently installed on a test site, calibration quency bands during hours when broad-
should be performed as required in 5.2.3. cast stations are off the air and at times
4.4.3 Absorbing Cable Clamp Calibra- when ambients from industrial equip-
tion. The absorbing cable clamp may be cali- ment are reduced to less than the 6 dB
brated using the procedure in clause 11.3 of level.
CISPR 16 (1987)[6],much of which is summa- (3) Perform measurements in an absorber-
rized in Appendix G. lined chamber (see 5.4.2for conditions of
4.4.4 Cable Calibration. Cables used for use).
connection of antennas or transducers to mea- (4) Make conducted measurements in a
suring instruments (radio-noise meters, spec- shielded enclosure. However, t h i s
trum analyzers, etc.) shall be calibrated for loss method is recommended only at frequen-
using an acceptable standard, such as IEEE cies below the resonant frequencies of
Std 474-1973[18],and checked frequently for the enclosure, usually under 30 MHz.
deterioration caused by use and exposure t o ( 5 ) For ac power-line-conducted measure-
sunlight, physical wear, and other conditions. ments, insert suitable line filters
between the power source and the LISN.
(6) Orient the test site so as to discriminate
5. Test Facilities against such ambient signals insofar as
possible.
Radiated and ac power-line-conducted mea- (7) If the signal being measured is narrow-
surements shall be made in an environment band and the ambient field is broad-
that assures valid, repeatable measurement band, reduce t h e bandwidth of t h e
results as described in 5.2 (conducted tests) or receiver.
5.3,5.4,and 5.5 (radiated tests). Where appro- (8) Rotate the EUT on a turntable while
priate, tests may be made a t the manufac- observing possible correlation between
turer’s location or the user’s installation (5.6). emission amplitude and EUT azimuth.
In any case, the requirements of 5.1 shall be
observed. 5.2 Conducted Emission Test Site Require-
ments. Conducted measurements may be
5.1 General Requirements made at a site that meets the requirements of
5.1.1 Power Source. Sufficient power shall this section. This may include a shielded
be available t o operate the EUT a t its rated (screened) room or a radiated emission test
voltage and current. site.
5.1.2 Ambient Radio Noise and Signals. 5.2.1 Conducting Ground Plane. The con-
Conducted and radiated ambient radio noise ducting ground plane for conducted emissions
and signal levels, measured a t the test site is to consist of a floor earth-grounded conduct-
with the EUT de-energized, should be at least ing surface, which may be the metal floor of a
6 dB below the allowable limit of the applicable shielded test chamber. The conducting surface
specification or standard. In the event that the is to be at least 2 m by 2 m in size, and shall
measured levels of ambient plus EUT radio extend a t least 0.5 m beyond the horizontal

18
ANSI
ELECTRICALAND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

projection (footprint) of the EUT. Where a floor- peak current drawn by the EUT (this may
mounted EUT normally does not make physical require ten times the kVA rating of the EUT).
contact with a grounded surface, the ground If other than air core inductors are used in the
plane shall be covered by insulating materials LISN, they shall be in a linear permeability
between 3 mm and 12 mm thick. range at the peak currents drawn by the EUT.
5.2.2 Vertical Conducting Surface. When 5.2.4 Voltage Probe. Where use of an LISN
conducted emissions are measured for devices is impossible due to high current requirements
that are tested on a table top, a conducting ver- of the EUT, or where a conducting ground
tical plate or screen of at least 2 m by 2 m in plane is not available, conducted emissione
size shall be located 40 cm to the rear of the tests shall be performed using the voltage
device. The conducting vertical plate or screen probe as discussed in 4.1.3. See also 5.6 and
shall be electrically connected to the conduct- 7.2.2.
ing ground plane along its entire length. This
5.3 Radiated Emission Test Site Require-
conducting vertical plate is required even if the
ments for Measurements Below 30 MHz.
test is performed at an open area test site. The
Measurements of electric field strength (see
metal wall of a screen room may satisfy this
8.3) should be made on an open area test site
requirement. These requirements do not apply
as shown in Fig 5. If permitted by the procur-
to conducted emission tests performed on floor-
ing or regulatory agency, measurements may
standing devices.
be made in a shielded enclosure at frequencies
5.2.3 Line Impedance Stabilization Net-
below its resonant frequency. For magnetic
work Installation. Where use of an LISN is
field strength measurements (see 8.2.1), a site
required (see Section 7), it shall be placed on
top of, or immediately beneath, the conducting similar to that of Fig 5 should be used except
that a conducting ground plane is not required.
ground plane and grounded to the plane.
If a conducting ground plane is present, the
The impedance at the EUT socket end of the
LISN or the socket end of any cable connected measured level of emission may be higher.
to the EUT end of the LEN, with the measur- Magnetic field strength measurements made at
a site with no conducting ground plane shall
ing instrument port of the LISN terminated in
take precedence.
50 Q, shall be within +30% and -20% of the
nominal LISN impedance shown in Fig 1 over 5.4 Radiated Emission Test Site Require-
the frequency range of the network to be used. ments for Measurements 30 MHz to 1 GHz.
If the attenuation (insertion loss) between the Test sites used for making final radiated emis-
EUT plug and the measuring instrument port sion tests shall be capable of meeting the appli-
on the LISN is more than 0.5 dB, it shall be cable requirements given in 5.4.5.
taken into account when calculating the EUT 5.4.1 Reference Test Site. The reference
emission levels. The site ground plane is the site for radiated tests is an open, flat area
ground reference for the LISN. (open area test site) characteristic of cleared,
Ambient noise may be present on the ac level terrain. Such a site shall be void of build-
power mains a t some locations at some fre- ings, electric lines, fences, trees, underground
quencies within the range of measuring inter- cables, pipelines, etc., except as required to
est. If t h e levels a r e sufficient to cause perform the test. A suggested layout of an open
interference with readings made using an area test site is shown in Fig 5, where the rec-
LISN, filtering of t h e ac mains may be ommended distance for R (measured from the
required. The filter should be inserted between nearest perimeter of the EUT) is 3, 10, or 30 m.
the ac mains supply and the ac input connec- All reflecting objects including test personnel
tion to the LISN, preferably as close as possible shall lie outside the perimeter of the ellipse.
t o the LISN t o reduce pickup by the leads ANSI C63.7-1988 [4] further describes the
between the filter and the LISN. The LISN characteristics and construction of open area
impedance shall be rechecked if an ac mains t e s t sites. A conducting ground plane is
filter is used. required (see 5.4.3).
Where an isolation transformer is used 5.4.2 Alternate Test Sites. Measurements
between the ac mains supply and the LISN, can be made at a location other than an open
care must be taken to ensure that this trans- area test site, such as a weather-protected site,
former’s rating is large enough to not affect the an absorber-lined room, a dedicated laboratory,

19
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

.-
POWER TO
MEASURING SET

MEASURING SET

ANTENNA

1.73 R
COAX CABLE

R - I
MEASUREMENT DISTANCE
(FROM PERIPHERY OF €UT)

1
I --
I I
I 2R - 1
I I

AREA DIMENSIONS =
a=3m I 10 m
6 m X 5.2 m 20 m X 17.3 m

Fig 5
Radiated Emission Measurement Obstruction-FreeArea
for Site with a Turntable

or a factory site, provided the alternate site achieved are equivalent to those obtained at an
meets the site attenuation requirements of open area test site over the frequency range at
5.4.5 over the volume occupied by the EUT (see which measurements are made. In cases of dis-
5.4.5.5) and the conducting ground plane agreement, final radiated emissions tests per-
requirements of 5.4.3. For the time being, formed at a n open a r e a site meeting t h e
weather-protected sites are exempt from the requirements of 5.4.1 and 5.4.5 take prece-
requirements to meet 5.4.5.5, as this matter is dence.
under study (see Appendix C). Measurements 6.4.2.1 Shielded Enclosures. A shielded
can also be made where the requirements of enclosure not containing absorber lining may
5.4.5 are not met but it can be demonstrated to be used only for preliminary testing (see
t h e relevant authority t h a t t h e results 8.3.1.1).

20
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 lcHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

5.4.3 Conducting Ground Plane. A con- tape and conductive adhesive a t least every
ducting ground plane is required at a radiated 30”.If there is no change in site attenuation,
emission test site. The conducting ground especially below 100 MHz for vertical polariza-
plane shall extend a t least 1 m beyond the tion measurements, the gap need not be filled.
periphery of the EUT and the largest measur- If significant changes are noted, i.e., a change
ing antenna, and cover the entire area between of greater than 0.5 dB, a suitable bridging
the EUT and the antenna. It shall be of metal mechanism a s mentioned above should be
with no holes or gaps having longitudinal installed. See ANSI C63.7-1988 [4] for further
dimensions larger than one-tenth of a wave- guidance.
length a t the highest frequency of measure- For some applications, such as operation of
ment (ANSI C63.7-1988141). A larger size the EUT via a remotely located simulator and
conducting ground plane may be required if the I/O cabling, the turntable should have a center
test site has any of the following characteris- opening that will allow cabling to be routed
tics: directly down to the conducting ground plane
(1) The terrain of the site is discontinuous. for raised turntables or below the conducting
(2) The terrain of the site is subject t o ground plane for flush turntables (note 3).
extreme seasonal variations in ground
NOTES: (1) If a remotely controlled turntable is not used
conductivity. for final radiated emission measurements, the measure
(3) There are unburied power or control ment report shall include information to demonstrate how
cables on the site. the influenca of the teeter‘s body waa eliminated from radi-
ated emission teat d t s .
(4) The site is located on pavement. (2) Because of their present rather extensive use, for a
(5) The site is raised or located on a rooftop period of three yeam from the date of approval of this stan-
or otherwise elevated above the sur- dard,raised turntablee, not exmeding 34 cm in height, may
be used for measuring floor-standing equipment. If a
rounding in situ ground. raised turntable is used the conducting ground plane shall
NOTE: Ongoing studies may indicate the need for specify- be continuous beneath the turntable. Material used for
ing a minimum conducting ground plane size. such turntables should be selected so that there is no
adverse effect when performing the site attenuation mea-
5.4.4 Turntable. A continuously rotatable surement. Because it is generally agreed that measured
levels are dependent on equipment height, in case of dis-
turntable shall be used for measuring radiated pute, measurements made with a flush-mounted turntable
emissions from all sides of the EUT. I t is shall take precedence.
strongly recommended that this turntable be (3) If the center area doer, not rotate with the turntable,
power and cooling access and receptacles can also be
remotely controlled to eliminate test personnel accommodated and supplied from below the top of the
from being in close proximity to the EUT and turntable.
thus affecting test results (See note 1).For
floor-standing EUTs, the turntable shall be 5.4.5 VaIidation Requirements. Radiated
metal covered and flush with the conducting emission test sites shall be validated by mak-
ground plane (note 2). Table-mounted EUTs ing both horizontal and vertical normalized site
shall be tested by using a nonmetallic table of attenuation (NSA) measurements. Antenna
correct height mounted on top of the flush- spacings used for making site attenuation mea-
mounted conductive turntable. A combination surements shall be the same as the spacing
of a raised nonmetallic turntable and non- used for the EUT compliance tests at frequen-
metallic table located on top of the conducting cies from 30-1000 MHz. The measured normal-
ground plane may also be acceptable. Site ized site attenuation data shall be compared to
attenuation measurements according to 5.4.5 those calculated for an ideal site.
shall be made to show if such combinations NOTE: During site attenuation measurements, the receiv-
meet requirements. The site attenuation mea- ing antenna positioner normally used and raised turntable,
surement should also show whether the gap if used, shall be in place.
between a conducting flush turntable circum- 5.4.5.1 Site Attenuation. A measurement
ference and the surrounding conducting ground site shall be considered acceptable for radiated
plane should be electrically bridged with suit- electromagnetic field measurements if the hori-
able rubbing or rolling flexible conductive zontal and vertical NSAs derived from mea-
material. The presence of such electrical con- surements, i.e., the “measured NSAs,” are
nection can be temporarily simulated by bridg- within *4 dB of the theoretical normalized site
ing the circumferential gap with conductive attenuations (5.4.5.3) for an ideal site.

21
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

5.4.5.2 Normalized Site Attenuation NOTE:The spacingR between log-periodicarray antennas


ie measured from the projection onto the conducting
Tolerance. The 24 dB tolerance in 5.4.5.1 ground plane of the midpoint of the longitudinal axis of
includes instrumentation calibration errors, each antenna.
measurement technique errors, and errors due
to site anomalies. These errors are analyzed in 5.4.5.4 Normalized Site Attenuation
ANSI C63.6-1988 [3] wherein it is shown that Measurement: Basic Procedures. Two
the performance of a well-built site contributes antennas are set up on the test site in an
only 1 dB of the total allowable tolerance. appropriate geometry as shown in Figs 6 and 7.
Appendix C of this document suggests actions The NSA procedure requires two different mea-
to be taken if a site fails to meet the require- surements of the voltage received, VR.The first
ments. reading of VRis with the two coaxial cables dis-
5.4.5.3 Theoretical Normalized Site connected from the two antennas and con-
Attenuation. The theoretical NSAs for the nected to each other via an adapter. The second
most used measurement separations and reading of VRis taken with the coaxial cables
antennas are shown in Tables 1 through 3 for reconnected to their respective antennas and
an ideal site. t h e maximum signal measured with t h e
The theoretical NSA is developed and calcu- receive antenna scanned in height [B9]. For
lated in [B13]. Tables 1 through 3 are from both of these measurements, the signal source,
[B81, [ S U I , [B121, and [B131. The mutual Viis kept constant. The first reading of VR is
impedance correction factors for tuned dipole called VDM and the second is Vsiw These are
antennas were developed in [B131 and have used in the following Eq 1 for the measured
subsequently been revised in @311] and [B121 NSA, A N ; all terms are in dB.
and are shown in Table 4. The symbols for
these tables are defined as follows:
horizontal separation between the pro- where
jection of the transmit and receive AFT = Antenna factor of transmitting
antennas on the conducting ground antenna
plane (meters) AFR = Antenna factor of receiving antenna
height of the center of the transmit- AAFToT= Mutual impedance correction factor
ting antenna above the conducting NOTE: The first two terms represent the actual measure-
ground plane (meters) ment of site attenuations; i.e., V, siteie equal to the
height of the center of the receive classid view of site attenuation m ~ - ~
antenna above the conducting ground V m = VI-CT - CR (Eq 2)
plane (meters)
NOTE: In the measurement p d u r e h, ie varied and the where CT and CR are the cable losses that do not need to be
maximum received s i 4 in the height scan range is used measured separately.
in the NSA measurements. f~ = frequency in MHz, AN =
NSA (see Eq 1). AFT and AFR are determined as specified in
C63.5-1988 [23. The mutual impedance correc-
Table 1is used for broadband antennas such tion factor in Table 4 applies only to the recom-
as biconical and log periodic arrays. Table 2 is mended site geometry of 3 m separation, both
for tunable dipoles (and broadband antennas horizontal and vertical polarization, with the
for alternate test site qualification) aligned use of resonant tuned dipoles. = 0 for
horizontally with respect to the conducting all other geometries and for broadband anten-
ground plane. Finally, Table 3 is for tunable nas.
dipoles, vertically aligned with respect to the Accurate antenna factors are necessary in
conducting ground plane. Note that in Table 3, determing the measured NSA. In general,
there are restrictions in the scan height h2. antenna factors provided with the antenna are
This takes into account the fact that the lowest inadequate unless they were specifically or
tip of the receive dipole is kept 25 cm or more individually measured and the calibration is
from the conducting ground plane. traceable t o a national standard. Linearly
NSA for frequencies other than those shown polarized antennas are required. ANSI C63.5-
in the tables may be found using straight-line 1988 [2] contains a design of a reference
interpolation between the tabulated values. antenna and methods for calibrating antennas.

22
ANSI
C63.4-1991
ELECTRICALAND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENTIN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz

23
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISEEMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

Table 2
Theoretical Normalized Site Attenuationfor Ideal Site
(Recommended Geometries for Tunable Dipoles and for Broadband Antennas
on Alternate Test Sites, Horizontal Polarization)

Polarization Horizontal Horizontal Horizontal Horizontal

R Meters 3. 0 30 30
hl Meters 2 2 2 2
hz Meters 14 1 4 1-4 2-6
fM AN (dB1 AN (dB1 AN (dB1 AN (dB1
30 11.0 24.1 41.7 38.4
35 8.8 21.6 39.1 35.8
40 7.0 19.4 36.8 33.5
46 ~~
5.5 17.6 34.7 31.5
50 4.2 16.9 32.9 29.7
60 2.2 13.1 29.8 26.7
70 0.6 10.9 27.2 24.1
80 -0.7 9.2 24.9 21.9
90 -1.8 7.8 23.0 20.1
100 -2.8 6.7 21.2 18.4
120 4.4 5.0 18.2 15.7
125 4.7 4.6 17.6 15.1
140 -5.8 3.5 15.8 13.6
150 -6.3 2.9 14.7, 12.7
160 -6.7 2.3 13.8 11.9
175 -6.9 1.5 12.4 10.9
180 -7.2 1.2 12.0 10.6
200 -8.4 0.3 10.6 9.7
250 -10.6 -1.7 7.8 7.7
300 -12.3 -3.3 6.1 6.1
400 -14.9 -5.8 3.5 3.5
500 -16.7 -7.6 1.6 1.6
600 -18.3 -9.3 0.0 0.0
700 -19.7 -10.6 -1.4 -1.3
800 -20.8 -11.8 -2.5 -2.4
900 -21.8 -12.9 -3.5 -3.5
1000 -22.7 -13.8 4.5 4.4
*The mutual impedance correction factors in Table 4 for horizontally polarized tunable dipoles spaced 3 m apart should be
inserted in Eq 1 of 5.4.5.4 in determining the measured normalized site attenuation data for comparison with the theoretical
normalized site attenuation values for an ideal site given in this table.

The reference dipole antenna (4.1.5.3)should tuned down to 30 MHz. The limiting factor of
be spot-checked against a known calibrated maintaining a t least a 25 cm clearance
antenna. Antenna factors usually account for between the lower tip of the receive and trans-
losses due to the balun. If a separate balun or mit antennas is covered by (1)furing the trans-
any integrally associated cables are used, their mit height a t 2.75 m, and (2)restricting the
effects shall be accounted for. downward travel of the receive antenna. These
Two procedures may be employed to deter- restrictions are stated explicitly in Table 3. For
mine the measured NSA: a discrete frequency vertical normalized site attenuation measure-
method and a swept frequency method. The ments with broadband antennas, no such scan
swept method may be used only with broad- height restrictions are required due t o the
band antennas. Figure 6 shows the horizontal much smaller fNed dimensions of a broadband
polarization geometry. In Fig 7, the recom- antenna compared with a tuned dipole, espe-
mended vertical polarization geometries for cially between 30 and 80 MHz. Using linearly
using tunable resonant half-wave dipoles are polarized broadband antennas also allows a
shown. This assumes t h a t the dipoles are transmit antenna height of 1m.

24
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

w
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

Table 4
Mutual Impedance Correction
Factors (A AFToT)for Geometry Using Two
Resonant Tunable Dipoles Spaced 3 m Apart
Horizontal Pol Vertical Pol
R=3m R=3m
h1=2m h l = 2.75 m
hz = 1to 4 m Scan h2 = (see Table 3)

fM
MHz
30 3.1 2.9
35 4.0 2.6
40 4.1 2.1
45 3.3 1.6
50 2.8 1.5
60 1.0 2.0
70 -0.4 1.5
80 -1.0 0.9
90 -1.0 0.7
100 -1.2 0.1
120 -0.4 -0.2
125 -0.2 -0.2
140 -0.1 0.2
150 -0.9 0.4
160 -1.5 0.5
175 -1.8 -0.2
180 -1.0 -0.4
NOTE:Calculated for resonant dipoles with reference antenna baluns using
Method of Momenta (NEC Code).
Theoretical free-space antenna factors are for ideal resonant dipoles with
an assumed 0.5 dB balun loss (each antenna). If the actual balun loss is
known, it should be used to provide an appropriate modification to each
antenna factor used in arriving at the correction factors in this table. See
Reference Antenna in ANSI C63.5-1988 [2]. These correction factors do not
completely describe antenna factors measured above a ground plane, e.g., at
heights of 3 or 4 m, since these antenna factors differ from free-space
antenna factors at the lower frequencies. However, within the error, and for
balance with substantially different loss than 0.5 dB,bounds described in
ANSI C63.6-1988 [3], the values are adequate to indicate site anomalies.
User is cautioned when using half-wavelength dipoles or antennas with
other than reference antenna baluns. These may exhibit characteristics dif-
ferent than the reference antenna.
Mutual coupling correction factors for 10 and 30 m are under considera-
tion. As an interim procedure, site adequacy can be assessed by considering
these correction factors to be equal to zero for such geometries and for all
measurements using broadband antenna.

NOTE:For both metho&, an impedance mismatch at the sured in turn. At each frequency the receive
output of the signal source or at the input of the radio- antennais moved Over the height range given
noise meter or spectrum analyzer may result in cable
reflections that could cause errors exceeding the NSA toler- in t h e appropriate table t o maximize t h e
ance. This can be avoided by use of padding attenuators of received signal. These measured parameter
10 dB; one at the output end of each transmitting and valuesare inserted in 1 to the mea-
receiving cable. These attenuators shall remain in the
cables for both V D M and VSib measurements. sured NSA. Appendix A contains a suggested
procedure involving a worksheet approach to
For the discrete frequency method, specific record the data, calculate the measured NSA,
frequencies given in Tables 1,2,and 3 are mea- and then compare it with the theoretical NSA.

26
ANSI
ELECTRICALAND ELECl’RONIC EQUIPMENTIN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

0
/
1
4 METERS’
4---
/
/I

’ II \
\
\
I I
I MAXIMUM
RECEIVED
AFTX / hi 2 METERS
SIGNAL

lM

1 METER

(REFER TO TABLES
1, 2, 3. AND 4)

Vi HELD CONSTANT
‘AT 30 METERS. TABLES 1,2. AND 3 ACCOUNT FOR SCAN HEIGHTS OF 1-4 AND 2-6 METERS.

Fig 6
Site Attenuation
(Horizontal Polarization, Broadband and Tuned Dipoles)

For the swept frequency method, measure- it is rotated about its center location through
ments using broadband antennas may be made 360°,such as by a turntable. In evaluating the
using automatic measuring equipment having site, the transmit antenna shall be placed at
a peak hold (maximum hold) storage capability, various points within the test volume with both
and a tracking generator. In this method both vertical and horizontal polarization, such as
antenna height and frequency are scanned or illustrated in Figs 8(a) and 8(b) D71. This may
swept over the required ranges. The frequency require a maximum of 20 separate site attenu-
sweep speed shall be much greater than the ation measurements, i.e., five positions in the
antenna height scan rate. Otherwise the proce- horizontal plane (center, left, right, front, and
dure is the same as in the previous paragraph. rear, measured with respect to the center and a
A detailed procedure is given in Appendix B. line drawn from the center to the position of
the measuring antenna), for two polarizations
5.4.5.5 Normalized Site Attenuation (horizontal and vertical), and for two heights (1
for Alternate Test Sites. For an alternate and 2 m, horizontal) (1and 1.5 m, vertical).
test site (see 5.4.2) a single point NSA mea- These measurements are carried out with a
surement is insufficient to pick up possible broadband antenna and distances are mea-
reflections from the construction and/or rf- sured with respect t o the center of the antenna.
absorbing material comprising the walls and The transmit and receive antennas shall be
ceiling of the facility. For these sites, a “test aligned with the antenna elements parallel to
volume’’ is defined as that volume traced out by each other and orthogonal to the measurement
the largest equipment or system to be tested as axis.
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISEEMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

T
RECORD VR WITH POINTS I
1 AND 2 CONNECTED I
AND DISCONNECTED
I

4 METERS
(6 METERS)’

ADJUST FOR
MAXIMUM

2.75 METERS
AT 30 MHz

(REFER TO TEXT
AND TABLES
1, 2. AND 3)

V i HELD CONSTANT
‘DIMESION FOR R =30M

Fig 7
Site Attenuation
Vertical Polarization Using Tuned Dipole Antennas

For vertical polarization, the off-center posi- (1) The vertical and horizontal polarization
tions of t h e t r a n s m i t a n t e n n a a r e a t t h e measurements in the rear position may
periphery of the test volume. Furthermore, the be omitted if the closest point of the
lower tip of the antenna must be greater than construction andlor absorbing material
25 cm from the floor, which may require the is a t a distance of greater t h a n one
center of the antenna to be slightly higher than meter from the rear boundary of the
one meter for the lowest height measurement. test volume (note 1).
For horizontal polarization measurements in (2) The total number of horizontal polariza-
the left and right positions if t h e distance tion measurements along the test vol-
between the construction and/or absorbing ume diameter joining the left and right
material on the side walls and the EUT periph- positions may be reduced to the mini-
ery is a t least one meter, the center of the mum number necessary for the antenna
antenna is moved towards the center position footprints t o cover 90% of that diam-
so that the extreme tip of the antenna is either eter.
at the periphery or distant from the periphery (3) The vertical polarization measurements
by not more than 10% of the test volume diam- at the 1.5 m height may be omitted if
eter. The front and rear positions are at the the top of the EUT including any table
periphery of the test volume. mounting is less than 1.5 m in height.
The number of required measurements can (4) If the test volume is no larger than 1m
be reduced under the following circumstances: in depth, by 1.5 m in width, by 1.5 m in

28
ANSI
C63.4-1991
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz

ANTENNA TO %-

BE RELOCATED

h, = 1.0AND 1.5 m

VERTICAL PROJECTION OF THE CENTERS


OF THE TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE ANTENNAS.

Fig 8
(a)Typical Antenna Positions for Alternate Test Site
Vertical Polarization NSA Measurements

h, = 1.O AND 2.0 m

OF THE TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE ANTENNAS.

Fig 8
(b) Typical Antenna Positions for Alternate Test Site
Horizontal Polarization NSA Measurements

29
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

height including table, if used, horizon- and the ground plane requirements of 5.4.3
tal polarization measurements need be (note 2).
made at only the center, front, and rear NOTES: (1) Radiated emission sources located near dielec-
positions but at both the 1 m and 2 m tric interfaces have been shown to have variations in cur-
heights. If (1)above applies, the rear rent distribution that can affect the radiation properties of
the source at that location [B12]. When the EUT can be
position may be omitted. This will located near these interfaces, additional site attenuation
require a minimum of eight measure- measurements are required. (2) Studies are underway to
ments: four positions vertical polariza- determine if any further tests are required to show alter-
nate test site suitability.
tion (left, center, right, and front) for
one height, and four positions horizon-
tal polarization (center and front) and 5.5 Radiated Emission Test Site Require-
for two heights; see Figs 8(c) and 8(d). ments Above 1 GHz. There are currently no
NSA measurements shall be performed with test site validation requirements above 1 GHz.
the transmit and receive antenna separation If a radiation test site meets site radiation
held constant according to Tables 1, 2, and 3. requirements between 30 MHz and 1 GHz, it
The receive antenna must be moved t o main- may be used for measurements above 1 GHz
tain the appropriate separation along a line without additional site qualifications.
towards the turntable center; see Figs 8(a), NOTE: Additional site validation requirements above
8(b), 8(c) and 8(d). The alternative test site is 1 GHz are currently under study.
considered suitable for performing radiated
emission testing if all NSA measurements pre- 5.6 Testing at Manufacturer’s Location or
scribed above meet the requirements of 5.4.5.1 User’s Installation. Testing is permitted a t

Fig 8
(c) Typical Antenna Positions for Alternate Test Site
Vertical Polarization NSA Measurements for an EUT
That Does Not Exceed a Volume of 1.0 m Depth, 1.5 m Width,
1.5 m Height, with the Periphery Greater Than 1.0 m from the
Closest Material That May Cause Undesirable Reflections
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

A 4 m
I
I
I
I
SCANNED

p = PERIPHERY OF EUT AS IT R = DISTANCE MAlNTAfNED BETWEEN THE


IS ROTATED THROUGH 360° VERTiCAL PROJECTION OF THE CENTERS
OF THE TRANSMIT AND
RECEIVE ANTENNAS.

Fig 8
(d) m i c a l Antenna Positions for Alternate Test Site
Horizontal Polarization NSA Measurements for an EUT
That Does Not Exceed a Volume of 1.0 m Depth, 1.5 m Width,
1.5 m Height, with the Periphery Greater Than 1.0 m from the
Closest Material That May Cause Undesirable Reflections

the end user’s or manufacturer’s premises, if required by the procuring organization, mea-
the equipment cannot be set up on an open surements shall be made using an artificial
area or alternate test site (see 8.3.2). In this hand to simulate the effects of the user’s hand.
case, both the equipment and its location are If the EUT can be operated either held in the
considered the EUT. The radiated emission hand or not held, it shall be tested in both
results are unique t o the installation site ways. The artificial hand shall consist of metal
because site containment properties affect the foil wrapped around the case, or part thereof,
measurement. The ac power-line-conducted as specified below. The foil shall be connected
emission results also may be unique t o the t o one terminal of an RC element consisting of
installation. However, where testing of a given a 200 pF capacitor in series with a 500 52 resis-
system has been accomplished at three or more tor. The other terminal of the RC element shall
representative locations, the results may be be connected t o ground. The EUT should be
considered representative of all sites with simi- mounted 80 cm above the conducting ground
lar EUTs for purposes of determining compli- plane for testing.
ance with emission requirements (if allowed in When the case of the EUT is entirely of
the procuring or requirements document). metal, metal foil is not needed. The capacitor of
Neither a conducting ground plane nor an the RC element shall be connected directly to
LISN shall be installed for user’s installation the body of the EUT. When the case of the EUT
testing unless one or both are to be a perma- is entirely of insulating material, metal foil
nent part of the installation. shall be wrapped around the handle(s) and also
wrapped around the body of the EUT that the
5.7 Artificial Hand. If the EUT is normally user may contact. All pieces of metal foil shall
operated while held in the hand, then when be connected together and to the capacitor ter-

31
ANSI
C63.4- 1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISEEMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

VERTICAL CONDUCTING SURFACE


PERIPHERAL POWER (FOR CONDUCTED ONLY)
CORDS OPTIONAL FOR RADIATED TESTS A

BUNDLED IF NECESSARY

REAR OF EUT AND


PERIPHERALS FLUSH

1
TERMINATED
I/O

I METER

MOUSE FLUSH WITH


KEYBOARD 10
(FLUSH WITH FRONT cm
OF TABLE TOP)

1.5 METERS
-I I

t USN8 may have to be pontionedto the side of the table to x m A the criterion
that the LISN receptacle must be 80 cm away h m the rear of the EUT.
Fig 9
Test Platform for Table-TopEquipment
(TopView)

mina1 of the RC element. When the case of the installed, arranged, and operated in a manner
EUT is partly metal and partly insulating that is most representative of the equipment as
material, and has insulating handles, metal typically used (i.e., a s specified in the EUT
foil shall be wrapped around the handles and instruction manual) or a s specified herein.
on the nonmetallic part of the body; the metal Equipment that typically operates within a
foils around the handles and the metal foil on system made up of multiple interconnected
the body shall be connected together and to the units should be tested as part of such a typical
capacitor terminal of the RC element. operational system.
NOTE: An artificial hand shall not be used when testing Generally, the system that is tested is based
ITE. on that typically marketed to the end user. If
the marketing information is not ci. ailable or it
is not practical to assemble extraordinary
6. General Equipment Configuration amounts of equipment to replicate a complete
and Operating Conditions marketed product installation, the test shall be
performed using the best judgment of the test
6.1 General Arrangement of Equipment. engineer in consultation with the design engi-
The EUT shall be carefully configured, neering staff. The results of any such discus-

32
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

sion and decision process shall be reported in within the range of 10"to 40 "C(50" to 104 "F)
the test report. unless the particular equipment requirements
Portable, small, light-weight, or modular specify testing over a different temperature
equipment designed for table-top operation range. The EUT and the measuring equipment
shall be placed on a suitable table. Large, shall be operated for a sufficient period of time
heavy equipment, normally operated while to approximate normal operating conditions
placed on a conducting floor, shall be placed on and maintain the calibration of the measuring
the ground plane. If the equipment is normally equipment. The warm-up time shall be
placed on a nonconducting floor, it shall be sep- included along with the measurement results if
arated from the conducting ground plane by 3 the ambient conditions are outside of the range
mm to 12 mm of electrical insulating material stated above, and evidence shall be given that
simulating t h e thickness of floor-covering the measuring equipment is accurate at the
material. Equipment designed for both table- temperatures used. The EUT ambient temper-
top and floor operation shall be tested only in ature and humidity levels should be recorded
the table-top configuration, unless the typical and included in the test report if critical to the
installation is floor-mounted or unless other- test results.
wise required by the appropriate authorities. Humidity levels shall be in the range of 10%
Additional and more detailed requirements on to 90% relative humidity unless the EUT oper-
specific types of EUTs are given in Sections 11 ating requirements call for a different level.
to 14. Unless specifically called out in t h e EUT
requirements, there should be no condensation
6.2 Grounding. The EUT shall be grounded in of moisture on the EUT.
accordance with the individual equipment
requirements and conditions of intended use. 6.6 Equipment Operating Conditions. The
When the EUT is furnished with a grounded EUT shall be operated at the rated (nominal)
terminal or internally grounded lead, and operating voltage and typical load conditions
when this terminal or lead is used in actual mechanical or electrical, or both-for which it
installation conditions, the ground lead or con- is designed. Loads may be actual or simulated
nection shall be connected to the conducting as described in t h e individual equipment
ground plane or under the floor in a raised requirements. For some EUTs, it may be neces-
floor installation, simulating actual installa- sary to develop a set of explicit requirements
tion conditions. Any internally grounded lead specifying the test conditions, EUT operations,
included in the plug end of the line cord of the etc., to be used in testing that EUT or class of
EUT shall be connected to ground through the EUTs for radio-noise emissions. Such require-
utility power service (see also 7.2). ments shall be documented in the report of
measurements for the EUT and may be used in
6.3 Special I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n . During the determining compliance with limits.
time radio-noise measurements are being When used, t h e t e s t programs or other
made, external electrical meters or electrical means of exercising the equipment should
indicating devices shall not be in the input or ensure that various parts of a system are exer-
output circuits of the EUT, except those nor- cised. In case the EUT is required to interact
mally used with the measuring equipment. functionally with other units, the actual inter-
6.4 S h o c k and V i b r a t i o n Isolators. The facing units shall be used to provide represen-
EUT shall be secured to mounting bases hav- tative operating conditions unless there is
ing shock or vibration isolators, if such mount- some documented reason for using a simulator.
ing bases are used in the normal installation.
Any bonding straps furnished with the mount-
ing base shall be connected to the conducting 7. Conducted Emission Testing
ground plane. When mounting bases do not
have bonding straps, bonding straps shall not Conducted power-line measurements shall
be used in the test arrangement. be made, unless otherwise specified, over the
frequency range from 450 kHz to 30 MHz to
6.5 Temperature and Humidity. The ambi- determine the line-to-ground radio-noise volt-
ent temperature of the actual EUT shall be age that is conducted from the EUT power-

33
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

input terminals that are directly (or indirectly 50 SZ when not connected to the measuring
via separate transformers or power supplies) instrument. When the test configuration com-
connected t o a public power network. These prises multiple units that have their own indi-
measurements may also be required between vidual line cords, conducted emission
9 k H z and 450 kHz. measurements shall be performed with the line
If the EUT normally receives power from cord of the particular unit under test (EUT)
another device that connects to the public util- connected to one LISN that is connected to the
ity ac power lines, measurements shall be measuring instrument. Those power cords for
made on that device with the EUT in operation the units in the remainder of the configuration
to ensure that the device continues to comply not under measurement may be connected to a
with the appropriate limits while providing the multiple outlet, which in turn shall be con-
EUT with power. If the EUT is operated only nected to an LISN different than the LISN
from internal or dedicated batteries, with no used for the power cord of the EUT. Typical
provisions for connection to the public utility ac conducted emission test setups are shown in
power lines (600 Vac or less) to operate the Figs 9, 10(a), and lo@). Each current-carrying
EUT (such as an adapter'), ac power-line-con- conductor of the EUT shall be individually
ducted measurements are not required. tested. Adapters connected between the EUT
power cord plug and the LISN power socket
7.1 Measurement Requirements. Measured shall be less than 20 cm long and contain only
levels of power-line-conducted radio noise shall one plug and one outlet, or shall be included in
be the radio-noise voltage from the line probe the LISN setup such that the calibration of the
or across the 50 SZ LISN port terminated into a adapter or extension cord with an adapter and
50 P noise meter, or where permitted, as the the LISN meets the requirements of 5.2.3.
radio-noise current on the power line sensed by If the EUT is normally operated with a
a current probe. All radio-noise voltage and ground (safety) connection, the EUT shall be
current measurements shall be made on each connected to the ground at the LISN through a
current-carrying conductor at the plug end of conductor provided in the lead from the ac
the EUT power cord or calibrated extension by power mains to the LISN.
the use of mating plugs and receptacles on the The excess length of the lead between the
EUT and LISN. Equipment shall be tested EUT and the LISN receptacle (or mains outlet
with power cords that are normally used or where an LISN cannot be used) or a calibrated
that have electrical and shielding characteris- extension cord connected to the LISN shall be
tics that are the same as those cords normally folded back and forth at the center of the lead
used. so as to form a bundle not exceeding 40 cm in
length. If the EUT does not have a flexible
7.2 Test Procedures power lead, it shall be placed at a distance of
7.2.1 Measurements at a Test Site. Table- 80 cm from the LISN (or mains outlet where an
top devices shall be placed on a platform of LISN cannot be used) and connected thereto by
nominal size, 1m by 1.5 m, raised 80 cm above a lead or appropriate connection no more than
the conducting ground plane. The vertical con- 1 m long. The measurement shall be made at
ducting surface (see 5.2.2) or wall of a screened the LISN end of this lead or connection.
room shall be located 40 cm to the rear of the The LISN housing, noise-meter case, con-
EUT. Floor-standing devices shall be placed ducting ground plane, vertical conducting sur-
either directly on the conducting ground plane face (see 5.2.21, etc., shall be bonded together.
or on insulating material as described in 6.1. 7.2.2 On-Site Conducted Emission Tests.
All other surfaces of table-top or floor-standing If tests are performed at user's installations,
EUTs shall be at least 80 cm from any other the EUT shall be installed as normally used
grounded conducting surface including the case (see 5.6).
or cases of one or more LISNs. 7.2.3 Preliminary Conducted Emission
Each EUT current-carrying power lead, Tests. Preliminary testing shall identify the
except the ground (safety) lead, shall individu- frequency that has the amplitude closest to the
ally be connected through a LISN to the input limit by operating the EUT in selected typical
power source. All unused 50 P connectors of modes of operation, typical cable positions, and
the LISN shall be resistively terminated in with a typical or representative system config-

34
ANSI
ELECTRICALAND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

10

GROUND PIANE

\I I L 3.31
3.1
I
3.3 -1 bl CONDUCTINGGROUND PLANE
EXTENDS AT LEAST 0.5 m
BYOND EUT SYSTEM FOOTPRINT

+ 3.2
c-

BONDEDTO GROUND PLANE ’


tLlSNs may have to be moved to the side to meet 3.3 below.

LEGEND
1. l n t e r c o d n g cables which hang doser than 40 an to to the ground plane shall be fdded back and forth forming a bundle30 to
40 cm long, hanging approximately In the middle belween ground plane and table.
2. VO cables which are connected to a eripheral shall be bundled in center. The end of the cable may be terminated if required
using conect terminatingimpedance. Le total length s~ not exceed 1 m
3. EUT connected to one USN. Unused USN connectors shall be terminated in 50 ohms. LISN can be placed on top of, or
immediately beneath. ground plane.
3.1 All other equipment poweredfrom second USN.
3.2 Multipleoutlet stdp can be used for multiple pawer cords of non-EUTequipment
3.3 LISN at least 80 cm from nearest part of €UT chassis.
4. Cables of hand-operateddevices, such as keyboards, mouses, etc., have to be placed as dose as possible to the host
5. Non-EUTcomponentc being tested.
6. Rear of €UT lndudng peripheralsSMI be all allgnedand flush with rear of table top.
7. Rear of table top shall be 40 cm removed hwn a vertical mnducting plane which is bonded to the floor groundplane (see 5.2).

Fig 10
(a) Test Configuration: Table-TopEquipment
Conducted Emission Voltage

35

._~- - __
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

EUT

I’\
/

- -
/ 0.8 m DISTANCE

USN I LISN

5
!
5.1

LEGENIl
1. Excess U 0 cables shall be bundled in center. If bundling is not passible. the cables shall be wound in turns. Bundling shd not
exceed 40 an in length.
2. Excess power cords shall be bundledin the center or shortened to approprhte length.
3. U 0 cables which are not connected to a peripheral shall be bundled in the center. The end of the cable may be terminated if
required using m ect terminating tnpedance. If bundling is not possible. the cable shall be wound in turns.
4. EUTandd cables shall be insulatedhomgmnd plane by 310 12 mm.
5. EUT cbnnected to one USN. USN can be placed on top of, or immediatelybeneath, ground plane.
5.1 All other equipment poweredfrom seamd LISN.

Fig 10
(b)Test Configuration: Floor-Standing Equipment
Conducted Emissions

36
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GKz C63.4-1991

uration. For each mode of operation and for Figures 1O(c) and 10(d) show typical test
each current-carrying conductor, cable manipu- setups. Figures 11 through 13 show variations
lation shall be performed within the range of of test setups for floor-standing and combina-
likely configurations. For this test or series of tions of table-top and floor-standing EUTs. The
tests, the frequency spectrum of interest shall LISN, installed for the power-line-conducted
be monitored looking for the frequency of maxi- radio-noise measurement, may be left in the
mum emission level relative to the limit. Once configuration for the radiated radio-noise tests,
a frequency of maximum emission is found for but unused terminals shall be terminated in
each current-carrying conductor of each power 50 9.If the LISN is used as part of the test
cord associated with the EUT, the one configu- setup when making radiated emission mea-
ration and mode of operation that produces the surements, the receptacle for the EUT power
emission closest to the limit is recorded. connection to the LISN shall be bonded to the
7.2.4 Final Conducted Emission Tests. open area test site conducting ground plane
Based on the preliminary tests of the EUT, the and located flush with the conducting ground
one EUT and cable configuration and mode of plane elevation. The LISNs shall be located
operation that produced the highest emission such that they do not interfere with the radi-
level with respect to the limit is selected for the ated measurement accuracy. I t is preferred
final test. If the EUT is relocated from a pre- that they be located beneath the conducting
liminary test site to a final test site, the high- ground plane.
est emission shall be remaximized at the final
test location before final conducted emission
8.2 Antenna Selection and Location
8.2.1 Magnetic Field Radiated Emis-
measurements are performed. The final test on
all current-carrying conductors of the power
sions. I n the frequency range of 9 kHz t o
cords that comprise the EUT is then performed 30 MHz, magnetic field measurements may be
performed. This method is applicable for radi-
without variation of the EUT, cable placement
configuration, or EUT mode of operation. Data ated radio noise from all units, cables, power
cords, and interconnecting wiring. A calibrated
shall be collected t h a t satisfies the report
requirements in Section 10. loop antenna as specified in 4.1.5.1 shall be
positioned with its plane vertical at the speci-
fied distance from the EUT and rotated about
its vertical axis for maximum response at each
8. Radiated Emission Testing azimuth about the EUT. For certain applica-
tions, the loop antenna may also need to be
positioned horizontally a t the specified dis-
Radiated emission measurements, unless tance from the EUT and rotated about a hori-
otherwise specified by the procuring authority zontal axis. The center of the loop shall be 1m
or regulatory agency, shall be made over the above the ground plane.
frequency range of 30 MHz to 40 GHz. 8.2.2 Electric Field Radiated Emissions
Below 30 MHz. Electric field measurements
8.1 Measurement Requirements. Measure- may be made in the frequency range of 9 kHz
ments shall be made at the EUT azimuth and to 30 MHz. This method is applicable for radi-
antenna height such that the maximum radi- ated radio noise from all units, cables, power
ated emission level will be detected. Ordinarily, lines, and interconnecting wiring. A calibrated
t h i s requires t h e use of a turntable a s monopole (rod) antenna as specified in 4.1.5.2
described in 5.4.4 and an antenna positioner. shall be positioned a t the specified distance
Where a continuous azimuth search cannot from t h e EUT. The base of t h e monopole
be made, frequency scans of the EUT field assembly should be placed on the conducting
strength with both polarities of the measuring ground plane; and if the antenna is supplied
antenna shall be made a t a minimum of 16 with a counterpoise, the counterpoise shall be
azimuth angles around the EUT, nominally bonded to the conducting ground plane.
spaced by 22.5", in characterizing the EUT 8.2.3 Electric Field Radiated Emissions,
radio-noise profile. If directional radiation pat- 30 MHz to 1 GHz. Electric field measurements
terns are suspected, additional azimuth angles may be made in the frequency range of 30 MHz
shall be examined. to 1000 MHz. A calibrated, linearly polarized

37
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

CONDUCTING GROUND
PLANE EXTENDS 0.5 m
BEYOND EUT SYSTEM
FOOTPRINT

LEGEND
1. Interconnectingcables which hang closer than 40 cm to to the ground plane shall be folded back and forth forming a bundle 30-
40 cm long, hanging approximatelyin the middle between ground plane and table.
2. VO cables which am connected to a peripheral shall be bund& in center. The end of the cable may be terminated if required
using correct terminating impedance. The total length shatl not exceed 1 m.
3. If LlSNs are kept in the test setup for radiated emissbns. it is preferred that they be installed under the ground plane with the
receptadeflush with the ground plane.
4. Cables of hand-operated devices, such as keyboards, mouses, etc., have to be placed as close as possible to the controller.
5. Non-€UT componentsof EUT system being tested
6. The rear of all components of the system under test ehaU be located flush with the rear of the table.
7. No vertical conduding wall used.
8. Power cords drape to the floor and are routed over to receptade.

Fig 10
( c ) Test Configuration: Table-TopEquipment
Radiated Emissions
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

4 L-TYPICAL
I I SPACING

/
\i
I 1 /i.
/
GROUND PLANE

I.€m!u2
1. Excess VOcaMes shad be bundledincenter. IfbundIii isnot~ssible,thecablesshall be arranqed inrerpenlinefashkn.
2. Excess power cads shall be bundled b.\ the center or shortened to apppriate lenglh.
3. VO d e s which am not mnected to a peripheral ahall be bundedin the mter.The end of the cable may be term-mtedif
m q u M using o o ~ ~ terminating
td bnpedanca. If krndIing Is not possible. the cable shall be arrangedin mrpendnefashion.
4. EUTandaUcablesthallbehsuW5rwngnwdplaneby3 ?Y 12mmdmnrlafingma@!.
5. It USNr am kept h &e test setup for radaaed emlssbns, it is p m f d lhatthey be n s W under the g d phne with the
wptade flush with tho gnwnd plane.

Fig 10
(d) Test Configuration: Floor-Standing Equipment
Radiated Emissions

39
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

I/O CABLES

AC AND REMOTE I10

NOTE: CABINETS SPACED TYPICALLY.

Fig 11
Test Configuration for Floor-StandingEquipment
(Cables at or Below Floor Level)

dipole antenna as specified in 4.1.5.3shall be NOTE: Reference [B9] indicates significant differences in
positioned at the specified distance from the the vertically polarized data measured using broadband
and tuned dipole antennas at minimum heights.
periphery of the EUT.
8.2.4 Electric Field Radiated Emissions,
NOTE: The specified distance is the horizontal separation 1 GHz to 40 GHz. Radiated emissions mea-
between the closest periphery of the EUT and the center of
the receiving antenna. surements above l GHz are made using cali-
brated linearly polarized horn antennas
Tests shall be made with the antenna posi- specified in 4.1.5.4,which have a smaller
tioned in both the horizontal and vertical beamwidth (major pattern lobe) t h a n t h e
planes of polarization. The measurement antennas used for frequencies below 1 GHz.
antenna shall be varied in height above the Since some EUTs may be larger t h a n t h e
conducting ground plane to obtain the maxi- beamwidth of the antenna at the specified sep-
mum signal strength. Unless otherwise speci- aration distance, and since the source of emis-
fied, the measurement distance shall be 3 m, sions is generally limited t o relatively
10 myor 30 m. At any measurement distance, small-angle cones of radiation, the antenna
the antenna height shall be varied from 1 m to beamwidth shall be known so that when large
4 m. EUTs are tested, the area of coverage of the
These height scans apply for both horizontal EUT can be determined. Moving the measure-
and vertical polarization, except that for verti- ment antenna over the surfaces of the four
cal polarization the minimum height of the sides of the EUT or another method of scan-
center of the antenna shall be increased so that ning of the EUT is required when the EUT is
the lowest point of the bottom of the antenna larger than the beamwidth of the measuring
clears the site ground surface by at least 25 cm. antenna.
For a tuned dipole, the minimum heights as For any EUT, the frequencies of emission
measured from the center of the antenna are should first be detected. Then the amplitudes
shown in Table 3, columns 2,4,6, and 8. of the emissions are measured at the specified

40
ANSI
C63.4-1991
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz

EXCESS CABLE BUNDLED ON SIDE


CABLES

AC AND REMOTE I/O

Fig 12
Test Configuration for Floor-StandingEquipment
(Overhead Cables)

I/O CABLES
/ 0.8 METER HIGH TEST TABLE

SEE NOTE, FIG 1 1 n /


AC CORD,.

zzzzzza-

Fig 13
Test Configuration for Combination Floor-Standing
and Table-TopEquipment
(Cables at or Below Floor Level)

41
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

measurement distance using t h e required easy to determine the spectrum signature of


antenna height, polarization, and detector the EUT and, if applicable, the EUT configura-
characteristics. tion that produces the maximum level of emis-
It is preferred that measurements be per- sions. A shielded room may be used for
formed on a n open area test site or in a n preliminary testing, but may have anomalies
absorber-lined room. However, measurements that can lead to significant errors.
may also be performed where there is adequate Broadband antennas and a spectrum ana-
clearance, considering the radiation pattern of lyzer or a field-intensity meter (FIM) with a
the EUT, to assure that any reflections from panoramic display are often useful in this type
any other objects in the vicinity do not affect of testing. It is recommended that either a
t h e measurements. Since t h e receiving headset or loudspeaker be connected as an aid
antenna is unlikely to sense simultaneously in detecting ambient signals and finding fre-
both a direct signal and a signal reflected from quencies of significant emission from the EUT
the conducting ground plane, a conducting when the preliminary and final testing is per-
ground plane is not required, but may be used formed in an open area with strong ambient
for measurements over 1GHz. signals.
In performing these measurements, the sen- The EUT should be set up in its typical con-
sitivity of the measurement equipment relative figuration and operated in its various modes.
to the limit shall be determined before the test. For table-top systems, during this process
If the overall measurement sensitivity is inade- cables should be manipulated within the range
quate, low-noise preamplifiers, closer measure- of likely configurations. For floor-standing
ment distances, higher gain antennas, o r equipment, the cables should be located in the
narrower bandwidths may be used. If closer same manner as the user would install them
measurement distances or higher gain anten- and no further manipulation is made. If the
nas are used, the beamwidth versus size of the manner of cable installation is not known, or if
EUT shall be taken into account. Also, mea- it changes with each installation, cables for
surement system overload levels shall be deter- floor-standing equipment shall be manipulated
mined to be adequate when preamplifiers are to the extent possible to produce the maximum
used. The effects of using bandwidths different level of emissions.
from those specified shall also be determined. For each mode of operation required to be
Any changes from the specific measurement tested, the frequency spectrum shall be moni-
conditions shall be described in the report of tored. Variations in antenna height, antenna
the measurements. (See also 10.1.4 and 10.1.9.) polarization, EUT azimuth, and cable place-
Burn-out and saturation protection for the ment (each variable within bounds specified
measuring instrumentation is required when elsewhere) shall be explored t o produce the
low-level emissions are to be measured in the highest amplitude signal relative to the limit.
presence of a high-level signal. A combination A step-by-step technique for determining the
of bandpass, bandstop, lowpass, and highpass highest emission relative to the limit can be
filters may be used. However, the insertion loss found in Appendix D.
of these or any other devices at the frequencies When measuring emissions above 1GHz, the
of measurement shall be known and included frequencies of maximum emission shall be
in any calculations in the report of measure- determined by manually positioning t h e
ments. antenna close to the EUT and by moving the
antenna over all sides of the EUT while observ-
ing a spectral display. It will be advantageous
8.3 Test Procedures to have prior knowledge of the frequencies of
8.3.1 Measurements on a Test Site emissions above 1 GHz. If the EUT is a device
8.3.1.1 Preliminary Radiated Emission with dimensions approximately equal to that of
Tests. Preliminary radiated measurements the measurement antenna beamwidth, the
shall be performed at the measurement dis- measurement antenna shall be aligned with
tance or at a closer distance than that specified the EUT.
for compliance to determine the emission char- 8.3.1.2 Final Radiated Emission Tests.
acteristics of the EUT. At near distances, for Based on the test results in 8.3.1.1, the one
EUTs of comparably small size, it is relatively EUT configuration, cable configuration, and
ANSI
ELECTRICALAND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

mode of operation that has the highest ampli- the limit distance from the nearest point of the
tude signal with respect to the limit is selected equipment being tested with antenna search
for the final test. The final test is then per- heights as normally required. Where measure-
formed on a site meeting the requirements of ments at the limit distance from the EUT are
5.3, 5.4, or 5.5 as appropriate without variation impractical, measurements may be made a t
of the EUT configuration or EUT mode of oper- greater or lesser distances and extrapolated to
ation. If the EUT is relocated from a prelimi- the limit distance (see 10.1.8.2). Care should be
nary test site to a final test site, the highest taken that measurements are not taken at dis-
emission shall be remaximized at the final test tances where the antenna is in the near field.
location before final radiated emission mea- An LISN shall not be used for testing at the
surements are performed. However, antenna user’s installation, unless the LISN is a part of
height and polarity and EUT azimuth are var- the normal installation, in order that the mea-
ied, and data shall be collected that satisfies sured radio noise be representative of the spe-
the report requirements in Section 10. cific site. In the tests, the height of the antenna
For measurements above 1 GHz, use the one and its polarization are to be varied in accord-
cable and EUT configuration and mode of oper- ance with the requirements of this section. For
ation determined in the preliminary testing to further guidance see IEEE Std 139-1988 [121.
produce maximum emission with respect to the
limit. Move the measurement antenna away 9. Radio-Noise Power
from each area of the EUT determined to be a
source of emissions to the specified measure- Measurements of radio-noise power may be
ment distance while keeping the antenna in made in lieu of radio-noise radiated emission
the “cone of radiation” from that area and measurements for certain restricted frequency
pointed at the area both in azimuth and eleva- ranges and for certain types of EUT. Such mea-
tion, with polarization oriented for maximum surements utilize the calibrated absorbing
response. The antenna may have to be higher clamp. Use of the clamp as an alternative to
or lower t h a n the EUT, depending on the radiated emission measurement shall be speci-
antenna’s size and mounting height, but the fied in the individual equipment requirements.
antenna should be restricted t o a range of
heights of from 1m to 4 m above the ground or 9.1 Absorbing Clamp Measurement Proce-
ground plane. If the transmission line for the dures. The test configuration for the measure-
measurement antenna restricts its range of ment of radio-noise power is shown in Fig 14.
height and polarization, the steps needed to The power cord connects the EUT with the
assure the correct measurement of the maxi- commercial power source.
mum emissions shall be described in detail in The EUT is placed on a nonmetallic table, or
the report of measurements. if it is a floor-standing unit, on the floor, and is
NOTES: (1) Use of waveguide and flexible waveguide may located at least 40 cm from any other metallic
be necessary at frequencies above 10 GHz to achieve usable objects. The power cord is positioned to form a
signal-to-noise ratios at required measurement distances. straight line so that the absorbing clamp can
If so, it may be necessary to restrict the height search of
the antenna, and special care should be taken to assure be moved along the power cord to determine
that maximum emissionsare correctlymeasured. the maximum radio noise. If radio-noise power
(2) All presently known devices causing emissions above is to be measured on a floor-standing unit, the
10 GHz are physically small compared to the beamwidths
of typical horn antennas used for EMC measurementa.For power cord shall leave the EUT at an angle of
such EUTs and frequencies, it may be preferable to vary less t h a n 45” with t h e horizontal until it
the height and polarization of the EUT instead of the reaches a height 40 cm above the floor, then
receiving antenna to maximize the measured emissions.
extend horizontally.
8.3.2 On-Site Measurements. When it is The absorbing clamp is then moved along the
required to make radiated emission tests on power cord and shall be positioned to absorb
site at a user’s installation, the instructions in maximum power, that is, give the highest indi-
the product standards or applicable regulations cation on the receiver. Normally, the maximum
shall be followed. Unless otherwise specified in that is nearer to the EUT is used.
the individual equipment requirements, mea- The radio-noise meter reading in dB(cIv) is
surements shall be made in accordance with directly translatable t o dB(pW) for the opti-
8.1 to locate the radial of maximum emission at mum coupling. The coupling varies from the

43
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

ABSORBER RADIO-NOISE METER

ABSORBING CLAMP
MOVED OVER POWER
CORD TO OBTAIN
I MAXIMUM READING C<RREm I \
'
I ON
A
TRANSFORMER
ABSORBER
(FERRITE RINGS)
ADDITIONAL ABSORBER
USED TO AVOID
INTERFERENCE FROM
MAINS (A SECOND
ABSORBING CLAMP MAY
BE USED HERE)

NOTE AA DESIGNATES THE LOCATION OF A VERTICAL CONDUCTING SURFACE


OR SCREENED-ROOM WALL USED FOR CALIBRATION PURPOSES; SEE G2.

Fig 14
Test Configuration for Radio-Noise
Power Measurement

optimum with distance from the EUT (first or dures or options were used (see 1.2).The test
second maximum) and frequency. The meter report shall also state the issue or year of the
reading must be corrected in accordance with referenced standard used.
the calibration data for the particular clamp 10.1.2 Equipment Units Tested. The test
used (see 4.4.3). report shall list all equipment tested, including
product type and marketing designations
where applicable. Serial numbers and any
10.Test Reports other distinguishing identification features
shall also be included in the test report. Identi-
"est reports are the means of presenting the fication or detailed description shall also be
test results to the appropriate procuring or reg- made of interconnecting cables.
ulatory agency or for archiving the data in the The rationale for selecting the EUT (com-
permanent files of the testing organization. As prised of the equipment units needed t o be
such, test reports shall be clearly written, in functionally complete and t h e necessary
unambiguous language. cabling) shall be noted in the test report.
10.1.3 Equipment and Cable Configura-
10.1 Test Report Content. The conditions of tion. The setups of the equipment and cable
test listed in the following sections shall be placement on the test site which produce the
described in the test report in order for the test highest radiated and the highest conducted
results to be properly documented. emissions shall be clearly shown and described.
10.1.1 Applicable Standards. In addition to Drawings or photographs may be used for this
this standard, any standards to which the EUT purpose (see 10.1.12). A block diagram showing
was tested shall be clearly described in the test the interconnection of the major functional
report. Where referenced standards have more units is also useful.
than one measurement procedure, or where the 10.1.4 List of Test Equipment. A complete
referenced measurement procedure h a s list of all test equipment used shall be included
options, the test report shall state which proce- with the test report. Manufacturer's model and

44
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

serial numbers, and date of last calibration and radiated emissions relative to the limit shall be
calibration interval, shall be included. Cable reported unless such emissions are more than
loss, measuring instrument bandwidth and 20 dB below the limit. If less than six emis-
detector function, video bandwidth, if appropri- sions are within 20 dB of the limit, the back-
ate, and antenna factors shall also be included ground or receiver noise level at representative
where applicable. frequencies shall be reported. The polarization
10.1.5 Units of Measurement. Measure- of the measurement antenna (horizontal or ver-
ments of conducted emissions shall be reported tical) shall be identified for each of the reported
in units of dB referenced t o one microvolt emissions. Radiated emission measurements
[dB(pv)]. Measurements of radiated emissions taken at alternative distances are to be con-
shall be reported in units of dB referenced to verted to the limit distance using the inverse
1 microvolt per meter [dB(pV/m)l at the dis- distance relationship, unless data can be pre-
tance specified in the appropriate standards or sented to validate a different conversion. At a
requirements. All formulas of conversions and particular frequency, the polarization with the
conversion factors, if used, shall be included in highest level shall be reported.
the measurement report. 10.1.9 General and Special Conditions. If
10.1.6 Location of Test Site. The location of an alternate test method was used, the test
the test site shall be identified in the test report shall identify and describe that method,
report. Sites that have received recognition provide justification for its use, and describe
from various accreditation bodies shall use the how the results obtained through its use corre-
same site address information as was included late with the methods specified by the standard
in their original application for recognition. to which the EUT was tested. Instrumentation,
10.1.7 Measurement Procedures. The instrument attenuator and bandwidth settings,
sequence of testing followed to determine the detector function, EUT arrangement, and all
emissions included in the test report should be other pertinent details of the test shall be pro-
documented. For example, the sequence used vided so that the alternate test method could
during preliminary testing in accordance with be replicated. Where automatic scan tech-
7.2.3 and 8.3.1.1 should be given in the test niques were used, an explanation of how the
report in sufficient detail to allow replication of highest emission relative to the limit from the
the test results by procuring or regulatory EUT was determined and the scan rate used
agencies, or if required to perform further tests (see 4.1.1.1) to obtain recorded emissions is to
and ongoing compliance checks. be included in the test report. The actual oper-
10.1.8 Reporting Measurement Data. The ating and environmental conditions (e.g., volt-
measurement results along with the appropri- age, power-line frequency, temperature,
ate limits for comparison shall be presented in relative humidity, etc.) shall be listed in the
tabular or graphical form. Alternatively, report.
recorded charts or photographs of a spectrum 10.1.10 Summary of ResuIts. The t e s t
analyzer display may be used if the informa- report summary section shall indicate whether
tion is clearly presented showing comparison to the EUT passes or fails, and give margins with
the limits and all data conversion is explained. respect to the limits to which it was tested. If
The method of comparing spectrum analyzer the equipment only passes with specific modifi-
output to the limits shall be included. cations or special attributes (such as shielded
10.1.8.1 Conducted Emission Data. The cables), this information shall be included in
frequency and amplitude of the six highest con- the summary results.
ducted emissions relative to the limit shall be 10.1.11 Required Signatures. The test
reported unless such emissions are more than report shall contain the signature of the repre-
20 dB below the limit. If less than six emis- sentative of the organization performing the
sions are within 20 dB of the limit, the back- tests. In addition, the test report shall contain
ground or receiver noise level shall be reported the identification of the staff that was responsi-
at representative frequencies. The specific con- ble for the proper execution of the test, and the
ductor for each of the reported emissions shall name and address of the party requesting the
be identified. tests. If changes are made during the period of
10.1.8.2 Radiated Emission Data. The test to bring the EUT into compliance, the test
frequency and amplitude of the six highest report shall so indicate. In addition, the report

45
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

submitted to the procuring organization or reg- configuration [see Figs lo@), 10(d), 11 and 121.
ulatory agency shall include a signed state- These include systems mounted over specially
ment by t h e manufacturer or developer designed computer raised flooring which facili-
agreeing to the modifications and their incorpo- tates intrasystem connection under the raised
ration into production. floor. Equipment making up the floor-standing
10.1.12 Test Report Appendixes. The test system can be interconnected with cabling
report shall contain, if required, photographs lying on the floor, under the floor in a raised
or detailed sketches of the EUT configuration, floor installation, or overhead according to nor-
showing sufficient information t o allow the mal installation. Third, there are systems that
EUT to be reconfigured in a manner that would are a combination of floor-standing and table-
allow the original test to be replicated with a top systems. (See Fig 13.) The remainder of
high likelihood that the test results would be in this section provides instructions for the test-
agreement with the results of the original test ing of each of these three types. In addition,
within acceptable tolerances. the specific equipment requirements shall be
observed.
10.2 Test Report Disposition. The test report ll.l.l Operating Conditions. As pointed
shall be maintained by the testing organization out in 6.6, all parts of the system shall be exer-
for a period of at least three years following the cised. For example, in a computer system, tape
date of the test. The manufacturer may be and disk drives shall be put through a read-
required by a regulatory agency to maintain a write-erase sequence, various portions of mem-
copy of the report for a longer period of time. ories shall be addressed, any mechanical
activities shall be performed, and video units
shall display a variety of characters.
U. Measurement of Information 11.1.2 Interface Ports. Interface cables
Technology Equipment (ITE) shall be connected to one of each type of func-
tional interface port of the EUT, and each cable
This section contains information applying shall be terminated in a device typical of actual
specifically to ITE. Testing is in general per- usage. Where there are multiple interface ports
formed as specified in Sections 6 through 8 all of the same type, additional connecting
with the additions, specific clarifications, and cables shall be added to the EUT to determine
exceptions described in this section. the effect these cables have on emissions from
This section prescribes many required proce- the EUT. The number of additional cables
dures and guidelines designed t o enhance should be limited to the condition where the
repeatability. If a particular EUT cannot be addition of another cable does not significantly
tested according to these rules, it is permissible affect the emission level, i.e., varies less than
to test the EUT in a manner dictated by good 2 dB. These additional cables need not be ter-
engineering judgment. The deviations from the minated.
test procedure and rationale behind the devia- Normally, the loading of similar ports is lim-
tion shall be fully justified and documented in ited to the following:
the test report but may require prior approval (1) Availability of multiple loads (for large
of the appropriate authority. systems)
(2) Reasonableness of multiple loads repre-
senting a typical installation
11.1 General Requirements for ITE. Equip- The rationale for the selection of the configu-
ment should be tested as part of a typical oper- ration and loading of ports shall be included in
ational system when possible. The selection the test report. Additional ports on support or
and placement of cables, ac line cords, host, interfacing units or simulators, other than
and peripherals depend on the type of EUT and those associated with the EUT or the minimum
must be representative of expected equipment required system, need not be cabled or used
installation. Three types are distinguished (see during testing.
6.1). First, there are systems normally used 11.1.3 Modular Equipment. Equipment
entirely on one table top (see Figs 9, 10(a) and that is comprised of a host unit that is popu-
lO(c)). A second type of system consists of lated with multiple plug-in modules, enhance-
equipment normally used in a floor-standing ment cards, coprocessors, etc., shall be tested

46
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 lJIz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

with a mix of plug-ins representative of that with a table-top system. In these cases, it is
used in a typical installation. For installations permissible for cabling to the host or peripher-
with a large number of plug-ins, a representa- als to be placed directly upon the conducting
tive number of plug-ins should be used. The ground plane or, if normally installed beneath
exact rationale for selecting the number of the conducting ground plane, beneath it. The
plug-ins t o use should be stated in the test remotely located device shall be located at a
report. A description of any process used t o distance sufficient to ensure that it does not
limit the number of modules tested should also contribute t o the measured level. This test
be described in the test report. The number of evaluates the interference potential of the
additional boards or plug-in cards actually table-top system and its associated intercon-
used should be limited to the number for which necting cables standing apart from a remotely
the addition of another board or card does not located device which, in turn, shall be evalu-
significantly affect the emission level, i.e., ated separately, unless it is a simulator.
varies less than 2 dB. Each added board or 11.1.8.1 Communications Network Con-
plug-in card shall have an interface cable con- nections. Distributed networks, e.g., a local
nected to it. These additiohal cables need not area network, may be simulated on the test
be terminated. site by lengths of cable and actual peripherals
11.1.4 Simulators. Wherever possible, or remote network communications simulators
actual interface equipment must be used. If located at a distance sufficient to ensure that
such equipment is replaced by a simulator, the they do not contribute to the measured level.
reasons for its use must be documented. (see Signals impressed on the network by the EUT
6.6) For communications network simulation, should be typical of normal operation.
see 11.1.8.1. U.1.9 Visual Display Units. If the EUT sys-
ll.1.5 Hosts. The host, typically a CPU or tem includes a visual display unit or monitor,
personal computer, should be tested as part of the following operational conditions apply:
a system. If the host is a personal computer, it (1) Set the contrast control to maximum.
shall be tested with peripherals as described in (2) Set the brightness control to maximum,
11.2. Interface cables should be connected to or at raster extinction if raster extinc-
one of each type of functional interface port on tion occurs a t less t h a n maximum
the host, and each cable should be terminated brightness.
in a peripheral load typical of actual usage. (3) For color monitors, use white letters on a
11.1.6 Peripherals. Any peripheral being black background to represent all colors.
tested separately should be driven by an appro- (4) Select the worse case of positive or nega-
priate host equipment. The host for a personal tive video if both alternatives are avail-
computer peripheral should be the personal able.
computer typical of actual usage. If the host is (5) Set character size and number of charac-
a personal computer, the host and peripheral ters per line so that the typical maxi-
under test shall be tested with any additional mum number of characters per screen is
equipment needed to satisfy the minimum sys- displayed.
tem requirements of 11.2. (6) For a monitor that has no graphics capa-
11.1.7 Interface Cables. Interface cable bilities, regardless of the video card
length should be typical of normal usage. The used, a pattern consisting of random text
interface cable used shall be (1)the cable sup- shall be displayed. For a monitor with
plied with the EUT, (2) one meter long if the graphics capability, even though another
EUT is a device tested on a table, or (31, if mul- video card may be needed to accomplish
tiple cable lengths are available, the length a graphic display, a pattern consisting of
and type (shielded, nonshielded) most typical of a line of scrolling H’s should be dis-
actual use. The same type of cable (i.e., played. For a monitor that has no text
unshielded, braided, foil shield, etc.) specified capabilities, use a typical display.
in the user manual should be used throughout
the tests. 11.2 System Arrangements. In order to repli-
ll.1.8 Remotely Located Devices. In cer- cate emission measurements, it is important to
tain applications, a remotely located device, carefully arrange not only the system compo-
usually of a floor-standing type, may interface nents, but also system cabling and power cords.
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

This section identifies the specifics of such peripherals are present, a typical configuration
arrangements for all types of EUTs. should be chosen that maintains 10 cm spacing
ll.2.1 Table-Top Equipment. For an EUT between all equipment cabinets. A mouse or
typically operated on a table top, the EUT shall joystick shall be positioned 10 cm to the right
be placed on a nonconductive platform, the top of the keyboard (see Fig 9).
of which is 80 cm above the conducting ground ll.2.1.4 Cable Placement. Excess inter-
plane. The preferred size of the platform top face cable length will be draped over the back
surface is 1m by 1.5 m, but it may be enlarged edge of the table top for table-top equipment. If
if necessary to allow for large systems. The sys- any draped cable extends closer than 40 cm to
tem shall be arranged in one typical equipment the conducting ground plane, the excess shall
configuration for the test. be bundled in the center in a serpentine fash-
For a personal computer or a peripheral ion using 30 to 40 cm lengths to maintain the
intended to be used with a personal computer, 40 cm height. If the cables cannot be bundled
the minimum system consists of the following due to bulk, length, or stiffness, they shall be
devices grouped and tested together: draped over the back edge of the table top
(1) Personal computer unbundled, but in such a way that all portions
(2) Keyboard of the interface cable remain a t least 40 cm
(3) Video display unit from the horizontal conducting ground plane,
(4) An external peripheral for each of two as shown in Figs 10(a) and 1O(c).
different types of available 1/0 protocols, If the monitor can be powered through an
e.g., serial, parallel, etc. outlet on the host unit, it shall be tested in two
( 5 ) If the EUT has a dedicated port for a ways, i.e., powered through the host, and pow-
special-purpose device, e.g., a mouse or ered separately as required during preliminary
joystick, that device shall be part of the conducted and radiated emission testing.
minimum system. Power cords of equipment other than the
EUT do not require bundling. Drape the power
NOTE: Items ( 0 , (21, andor (3) may, in some systems, be cords of non-EUT equipment over the rear edge
aseembled in the same chaaais. In no instance may items
(11, (21, or (3) or joystick controls, satisfy the requirements of the table and route them down onto the floor
of item (4). See 11.1.3 for additional information. of the conducted test site to the second LISN.
These power cords of non-EUT equipment
Figures 9 and lO(a)-lO(d) show the recom- should not be draped over the top of a LISN.
mended equipment and cable configurations See Figs 10(a) and lO(c).
that are described in 11.2.1.1 through 11.2.1.5. If the above configuration is atypical of the
Deviations from the prescribed procedure are design or function of the EUT, the EUT may be
permitted only where justified by typical usage tested in a typical system that does not satisfy
and shall be described and fully justified as the above requirements. The deviation from
outlined in 1.2 and 10.1.9. the required minimum system shall be fully
11.2.1.1 Placement of Host. For table-top described and justified in the test report.
hosts, the host shall be centered laterally on 11.2.1.5 Cable Manipulation. In making
the table top and its rear shall be flush with any tests involving several table-top equip-
the rear of the table. ments interconnected by cables, it is essential
11.2.1.2 Placement of Monitors and to recognize that the measured levels may be
Keyboards. The monitor should be placed on critically dependent upon the exact placement
top of the host, centered and flush with the of the cables. Thus preliminary tests as speci-
front of the host. The keyboard shall be posi- fied in 7.2.3 and 8.3.1.1 should be carried out
tioned in front of the monitor, centered on the while varying cable positions in order to deter-
monitor, and flush with the front edge of the mine the maximum or near-maximum emission
table-top surface. level. During manipulation, cables shall not be
ll.2.1.3 Placement of External Periph- placed under or on top of the system test com-
erals. External peripherals that are part of a ponents unless such placement is required by
table-top system shall be placed in a single con- the inherent equipment design.
figuration to either side of the host with a 11.2.2 Floor-Standing Equipment. m i c a 1
10 cm separation. If more than two external configurations for floor-standing equipment are

48
ANSI
ELECTRIC& AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 lcHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

shown in Figs 11 and 12. Normally, tests shall setups and carrying out the required conducted
be run with the devices standing on the con- and radiated tests for personal computers are
ducting ground plane, with or without an given in Appendix E.
insulating surface, as appropriate. (See Sec- 11.3.1 Final Conducted Emission Mea-
tion 6). surements. Using the configuration deter-
ll.2.2.1 Overhead Cable Trays and Sus- mined in 7.2.3 and t h e procedure in 7.2.4,
pended Ceilings. Where overhead cable trays perform final conducted emission measure-
or suspended ceilings are used, tests may be ments on the EUT.Record the six highest emis-
performed with the overhead cable trays or sions relative to t h e limit of all t h e
suspended ceilings as shown in Fig 13. The current-carrying conductors of the power cords
trays or ceilings should be typical of an instal- t h a t comprise the EUT over the frequency
lation. Care is needed to precisely define the range specified by the procuring organization
cable layout to be able to repeat the emission or regulatory agency. Photograph or diagram
measurements. the test setup that was used.
ll.2.2.2 Cable Manipulation. Cables are The quasi-peak detector function, specified
not normally manipulated for floor-standing for use between 150 kHz and 30 MHz, may not
equipment where the typical installation is indicate the same subjective interference level
known. Instead, the cables shall be laid out as for both narrowband and broadband sources.
shown in Figs lO(b) and 10(d). If the configura- This has been recognized and ways to account
tion of a typical installation is not known or for the unequal interference potential of nar-
changes with each installation, cables of floor- rowband and broadband emissions have been
standing equipment shall be manipulated to adopted.
the extent possible to produce the maximum NOTE: For ITE, the frequency range for conducted emis-
level of emissions, within the range of typical sion measurement8is 450 kHz to 30 MHz.
installations. When the procuring organization or regula-
ll.2.2.3 Cable Placement. Excess cable tory agency specifies two limits using different
length shall be folded back and forth in the detector functions in the measuring instru-
center to form a bundle between 30 and 40 cm ment, conducted emissions shall be measured
in length. If the cables cannot be folded due to with the specified detector functions and emis-
bulk, stiffness, o r length, they shall be sions shall comply with the appropriate limit.
arranged in a serpentine fashion [see Figs When only one limit is specified requiring
1O(b) and 10(d)]. the quasi-peak detector function, and if the
11.2.3 Combination Table-Top and Floor- EUT exhibits conducted emissions that exceed
Standing Equipment. A floor-standing and the limit with the instrument set to the quasi-
table-top combination system may be tested peak mode, then measurements should also be
separately; i.e., it may be tested separately as made in the average mode. If the amplitude
described in 11.2.1 and 11.2.2. If desired, how- measured in the quasi-peak mode is at least
ever, the combination can be placed on the test 6 dI3 higher than the amplitude measured in
site at one time as shown in Fig 13. Any typical the average mode, the level measured in the
configuration of placement of the floor-standing quasi-peak mode may be reduced by 13 dB
system with the table-top system may be used. before comparing it to the limit. If the 13 dB
The position chosen should be precisely noted reduced quasi-peak mode level is below the
in the test report. The position of equipment limit, the EUT is considered to have met the
units comprising the table-top portion of the limit requirements. When exercising this
EUT need not be physically moved for combi- option, t h e following conditions shall be
nation system testing. Cables shall be manipu- observed:
lated in accordance with 11.2.1.5 and 11.2.2.2. (1) The measuring instruments with the
quasi-peak and average detector shall
ll.3 Final Tests. The following paragraphs have a linear response.
describe the procedures that may be used for (2) The quasi-peak and average measure-
performing the final radiated and conducted ment instrument shall have the same
emissions tests of ITE. Additional guidance nominal bandwidth.
and step-by-step procedures for preparing the (3) When measuring an emission with a low

49
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

duty cycle, the dynamic range of the The EUT is compliant if no more than 25% of
measuring instrument shall not be the clicks (that exceed the basic limit) exceed
exceeded. the relaxed limit.
11.3.2 Final Radiated Emission Measure-
ments. Using the test configuration deter-
mined in 8.3.1.1 and the procedure in 8.3.1.2, 16. Bibliography
perform final radiated emission measurements
on the EUT. Record the six highest emissions The following publications are for informa-
relative t o the limit in the frequency range tion only and are not essential for application
specified in the individual equipment require- of this standard.
ments. Photograph or diagram the test setup.
[Bll ANSI C63.12-1987,American National
Standard for Electromagnetic Compatibility
Limits-Recommended Practice.
12. Measurements of
Intentional Radiators [BZ]CENELEC EN 45 001-1989,General Cri-
teria for the Operation of Testing Labora-
This section is under consideration. tories.9

[B3]CENELEC EN 55022-1987,Limits and


Methods of Measurement of Radio Interference
13. Measurements of Characteristics of Information Technology
Unintentional Radiators Equipment, ed. 1.

This section is under consideration. [B4]IEEE Std 368-1977,IEEE Recommended


Practice for Measurement of Electrical Noise
and Harmonic Filter Performance of High-Volt-
age Direct-Current Systems.10
14. Measurements of Periodic
Intentional Radiators [B5]IEEE Std 430-1986,IEEE Standard Pro-
cedures for the Measurement of Radio Noise
This section is under consideration. from Overhead Power Lines and Substations
(ANSI).
[B6]ISO/IEC Guide 45 (1985),Guidelines for
15. Limit Relaxation for Transients the Presentation of Test Results.11

For many devices, transients of short dura- [B71 German, R. F., “Comparison of Semi-he-
tion repeated infrequently do not cause signifi- choic Chamber and Open-Field Site Attenua-
cant interference. For t h i s reason, when tion Measurements,’’ 1982 IEEE International
permitted by the responsible agency, when Symposium Record on Electromagnetic Com-
transients whose individual durations do not patibility.
exceed 200 ms (i.e., “clicks” as used in CISPR
16 (1987)[6])occur and exceed the radiated or
conducted limit for continuous disturbances,
9CENELEC publications can be obtained from the Euro-
unless otherwise specified, the limit can be pean Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, 2
relaxed for the transients according to the fol- rue Brederode Bte. 5, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium. In the US,
lowing table where N i s the number of CENELEC publications are available from the Sales
Department, American National StandardsInstitute.
clickdminute above the limit: “JThis standard was withdrawn by ANSI. It can be
obtained from the IEEE Service Center.
Click Rate N Relaxation, dB 11ISO publications are available from the IS0 Onice, 1
rue de VarembB, Case Postale 56, CH-1211, Genhve 20,
20.2 44

230
0.2 c N -c 30 20 log
0
($ ) SwitzerlandlSuisse.In the US, IS0 publications are avail-
able from the Sales Department, American National Stan-
dards Institute.
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHe C63.4-1991

[BSI Heirman, D. N., “Definitive Open Area [B12] Pate, J. B., “Potential Measurement
Test Site Qualifications,” 1987 IEEE Interna- Errors Due to Mutual Coupling Between
tional Symposium on EMC, 87CH2487-7, Dipole Antennas and Radio Frequency Absorb-
Atlanta, GA, Aug. 25-27,1987. ing Material in Close Proximity,” 1984 IEEE
National Symposium Record on Electomagnetic
[B91 Heirman, D. N., “Vertical Site Attenua- Compatibility.
tion-A Necessity,” 1986 IEEE International
Symposium on EMC, 86CH2294-7, San Diego,
CA, Sept. 16-18,1986, pp. 342-346. B131 Smith, A. A. Jr., German, R. F., and Pate,
J. B. “Calculation of Site Attenuation from
[ S l O l Kawana, T. and Miyajima, S., “Theoreti- Antenna Factors,” IEEE l’kansactions on Elec-
cal Investigations of Site Attenuation by Means tromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 24, no. 3, Aug.
of Mutual Impedance Between Antennas--In 1982, pp. 301-316.
case of 3 Meters Distance Between Antennas,”
Journal of the Radio Research Laboratories,
vol. 26, no. 120/121, Tokyo, Japan, July/Nov. tJ3141 Taggart, H. E. and Workman, H. L., “Cal-
1979, pp. 135-145. ibration Principles and Procedures for Field
Strength Meters (30 Hz to 1GHz),” U. S. Dept.
[Sill Pate, J. B., Knight, A. K., “Variations in of Commerce. NBS Tech. Note 370.
Mutual Coupling Correction Factors for Reso-
nant Dipoles Used in Site Attenuation Mea-
surements,” 1990 IEEE EMC Symposium IJ3151 Tai, C.T., “Coupled Antennas,” Proceed-
Record, Washington, D.C. ings of the I.R.E., Apr. 1948, pp. 487-500.
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

Appendixes
C l b e e Appendixee are not a part of ANSI C63.4-1991,American National Standard for Method8 of Measurement of Radio-
Noise Emieeione from Low-Voltap Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz, but are included for
information only.)

Appendix A
Site Attenuation Using Discrete Frequencies

The discrete frequency method is performed ration using tunable dipoles (see Table 4 for
using a worksheet approach @391.The simple these mutual coupling corrections). [dB1
worksheet (1)orders the site attenuation mea- Column 6: A = Site attenuation (algebraic
surements, (2) directs the application of vari- sum of column 3 less column 4) [dBl
ous corrections, and (3) provides a method for Column 7: AFT = Transmit antenna factor
comparing deviations of the measured NSA (accurately measured for this antenna) [dB
data from the NSA for an ideal site. Fig A1 (l/m)l
contains the recommended worksheet for mak- Column 8: AFR = Receive antenna factor
ing the measured NSA comparisons with the (accurately measured for this antenna) [dB
values for the ideal site obtained in Tables 1 (l/m>l
through 3. The entries are used for solving Eq Column 9: AN = Measured normalized site
1.The entries for each column are as follows: attenuation-NSA (column 6 less column 7 less
Column 1: Frequency between 30-1000 MHz column 8). This is equivalent to AN given by
in steps indicated in Tables 1through 3. Eq 5. [dBl
Column 2: The polarization of both transmit Column 10: Theoretical NSA (see appropri-
and receive antennas with respect to the con- ate values for site attenuation geometry and
ducting ground plane. antennas used in Tables 1through 3)
Column 3: V D is the ~ level at the receiver Column 11: Deviation = column 10 less col-
or spectrum analyzer when the coaxial feed umn 9. [dBl
lines connected t o each antenna are directly The following is an example of the use of the
connected together (points 1and 2 connected in worksheet. Consider a 3 m separation horizon-
Figs 6 and 7). [dB(c1v)] tal site attenuation measurement using tun-
Column 4: Vsite is the level measured at the able resonant half-wave dipoles a t 80 MHz.
receiver or spectrum analyzer when the receive The worksheet entries are shown in Table Al.
antenna is searched in height for maximum The column 6 value of 15.0 dB is equivalent
transmitted signal which is required for site to the site attenuation for tunable resonant
attenuation measurements. The level of the half-wave dipoles. The NSA removes the
signal generator is the same as for the column antenna factor and allows the comparison with
3 measurement. [dB(pV)] the NSA for an ideal site. Column 11, hence,
Column 5: AAFTOT= 0 for all vertical and gives a deviation amplitude of 2.5 dB with
horizontal site attenuation measurements respect t o the ideal site attenuation.
made at separations of 10 and 30 m for tunable In the example given in Table Al, the 2.5 dB
dipoles and for all other measurements using falls well within * 4 dB and indicates site
broadband antennas. AAFTOTis not equal to 0 acceptability and probably a less than 1dB site
for site attenuation measurements at 3 m sepa- imperfection at 80 MHz, which is quite good.

52
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

Fig A1
Site Attentuation Worksheet

53

__
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

Table A1
Example of Worksheet Entries
Column Entry
1 80 MHz frequency
2 Horizontal (polarization)
3 81.5 dEi(cLV) (assumed value)
Receiverlspectrum analyzer reading with coaxial cables
connected
4 67.5 dB(pW (assumed value)
Receiverlspectrum analyzer reading with receiver signal
maximized by searching the height between 1and 4 m
5 -1.0 dB (from Table 4)
6 15.0 dE3 r81.5 - 67.5 - (-1 1.01
7 6.7 dB assumed from calibration curve
8 6.5 dB assumed from calibration curve
9 1.8dB [15.0 - 6.7 - 6.51
10 -0.7 dB (from Table 2)
11 -2.5 dB [-0.7 - (1.8)J(calculated deviation)
from model)

Fig A2
Measurement of LISN Insertion Loss

LISN

-LOAD TERMINAL OR AC OUTLET

4 LOW IMPEDANCE COAXIAL ADAPTOR

10 dB ATENUATOR ' \
- "1 4
--
CONNECT ATENUATORS TOGETHER FOR REFERENCE LEVEL
GENERATOR
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

Appendix B
Site Attenuation Using Swept Frequencies

Swept frequency method measurements may dB(pV). (The time it takes to lower the
be made using broadband antennas and a spec- antenna should be much longer than the
trum analyzer with a peak hold, maximum spectrum analyzer sweep time.)
hold, or storage capability, and a tracking gen- ( 5 ) Disconnect the transmit and receive
erator. This method does not require the use of cables from the antennas and connect
a worksheet since all comparisons are made directly together with a straight through
with spectrum analyzer traces and separately adapter. Store or record the resulting
constructed plots. voltage display.
Adjust the output level of the tracking (6) At each frequency, subtract the voltage
generator to give a received voltage dis- measured in step (4) from the voltage
play well above ambient and spectrum measured in step (5.) Also subtract the
analyzer noise. antenna factors for the transmit and
Raise the receiving antenna on the mast receive antennas, AFR and AFT (dB/m),
t o t h e maximum height of t h e scan respectively. (Antenna factors as a con-
range as indicated in the appropriate tinuous function of frequency can be
Table, 1through 3. obtained using the standard site method
Set the spectrum analyzer to sweep the for calibrating antennas described in
desired frequency range. Ensure that ANSI C63.5-1988 121 or by using simple
the spectrum analyzer is adjusted so linear curve fitting on a set of discrete
that a similar signal up to 60 dB higher antenna factor values). The result is the
can be displayed on the same amplitude measured NSA over the range of fre-
scale. This will accommodate the levels quencies used, which should be plotted.
to be recorded in step (5). Also plot the theoretical normalized site
Slowly lower the receiving antenna to attenuation for an ideal site. If this proc-
the minimum height of the scan range as ess is carried out automatically in the
indicated in the tables for the appropri- analyzer, the accuracy of the analyzer to
ate site geometry. Store or record the perform these calculations shall be con-
maximum received voltage display VR in firmed.
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

Appendix C
Site Attenuation Deviations
If the deviation exceeds the *4 dB criterion, area, and the antenna and cabling placement
investigate as follows: are suspect. The vertical site attenuation
Start by checking the measurement system should in general be the most sensitive to site
calibrations. If the signal generator and anomalies. If so, use that measurement as the
receiverlspectrum analyzer do not drift during basis for tracking down the problem. Problems
the measurements, the prime suspects are the that may be found include inadequate conduct-
antenna factors. If these all check out, repeat ing ground plane construction and size, reflect-
the measurement.1 If the differences are still ing objects too close by (fences, buildings, light
greater than +4 dB, the site, the surrounding towers, etc.), and degraded performance of all-
weather enclosures due to inadequate construc-
tion techniques and such long-term problems
as penetration of residue from airborne conduc-
1 Consider adding the 10 dFJ pads indicated in the note
in 6.4.6.4 (third to last paragraph), especially if the anten- tive contaminants (ANSI C63.6-1988[31 and
nas are suspected to have a relatively high VSWR. ANSI C63.7-1988[4]).
ANSI
ELECTRICALAND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 lrHzTO 40 GHz C83.4-1991

Appendix D
Method of Preliminary Radiated Emission Maximization

The maximum radiated emission for a given ously noted highest amplitude signal by
mode of operation may be found during prelim- 1dB or more, return to step (2) with the
inary testing, by using the following step-by- antenna fmed a t this height. Otherwise,
step procedure: move the antenna to the height that
(1) Monitor the frequency range of interest repeats the highest amplitude observa-
a t a fixed antenna height and EUT tion and proceed.
azimuth. Change the polarity of the antenna and
(2) If appropriate, manipulate the system repeat steps (2) through (4).Compare
cables to produce the highest amplitude the resulting suspected highest ampli-
signal relative t o the limit. Note the tude signal with t h a t found for the
amplitude and frequency of the suspect other polarity. Select and note t h e
signal. higher of the two signals. This signal is
(3) Rotate the EUT 30" to maximize the termed the highest observed signal with
suspected highest amplitude signal. If respect to the limit for this EUT opera-
the signal or another at a different fre- tional mode.
quency is observed to exceed the previ- The effects of various modes of opera-
ously noted highest amplitude signal by tion shall be examined. One way to do
1 dB or more, go back to the azimuth this is to vary the equipment modes as
and repeat step (2). Otherwise, orient steps (2) through (5) are being per-
the EUT azimuth to repeat the highest formed.
amplitude observation and proceed. After completing steps (1)through (61,
(4) Move the antenna over its full allowed record the final EUT configuration,
range of travel t o maximize the sus- mode of operation, and cable configura-
pected highest amplitude signal. If the tion to use for the final radiated emis-
signal or another a t a different fre- sions test in 8.3.1.2.
quency is observed to exceed the previ-
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENTOF RADIO-NOISEEMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

Appendix E
Step-by-stepGuidance for Testing Personal Computers and
Associated Peripherals
The following procedure may be used as a and route them down onto the floor of the con-
guide for determining compliance of a personal ducted test site to the second LISN. Power
computer or associated peripherals with cer- cords of peripheral equipment should not be
tain regulatory requirements. The section draped over the top of an LISN.
numbers refer t o sections or subsections in
ANSI C63.4-1991. This procedure may also be
used as a guide for measuring other devices, as E2. Line-ConductedEmission Testing
appropriate.
(1) Check the calibration of the measuring
instrument using either an internal cal-
El. Line-ConductedSetup ibrator or a known signal level from an
external signal generator.
The conducted test facility shall con- (2) A spectrum analyzer or other instru-
form to the requirements of 5.2-5.2.3 ment providing a spectral display is rec-
and 7.2-7.2.2. The measuring instru- ommended for preliminary conducted
ments, including the line impedance measurements. Connect the measuring
stabilization network (LISN) shall con- instrument t o a section of the LISN
form to the requirements in Section 4. supplying current to one of the conduc-
The equipment under test (EUT) shall tors in the EUT using a suitable length
be configured in accordance with Sec- of coaxial cable. Set the 6 dE3 bandwidth
tions 6-6.6, 11.1-11.1.3, and 11.2- of the measuring instrument to not less
11.2.3. than 10 k H z and the detector function
Use the type and length of interface t o the peak mode. Set the controls on
cables specified in 11.1.7-11.1.8.1 and the measuring instrument to enable
connect them to the interface ports on viewing the entire frequency range for
the EUT as per 11.1.2. Interface cables which limits are specified.
shall be individually bundled as (3) Activate the EUT and the measuring
described in 11.2. The bundle should be instrument to meet the requirements of
secured with masking tape or any other 6.5.
nonconducting material that will not (4) Exercise the EUT as specified in 11.1.1.
affect the measurements. Other equipment connected to the EUT
Connect the EUT to one LISN and con- shall be exercised independently.
nect the peripheral or support equip- (5) Follow the procedure in 7.2.3, and use
ment to a separate LISN as described in the configuration in 11.2 to produce the
7.2.1. AC power for all LISNs is to be highest amplitude signal relative to the
obtained from the same ac source. limit. The EUT may be turned off and
NOTE: AB noted in 11.2.1.4, the monitor shall be on to determine which emissions origi-
powered by two separate sources as follows: (1) a nate from it.
second LISN, and (2) an ac outlet provided on the (6) If the EUT is moved t o a final con-
back of the personal computer, if appropriate.
When a personal computer is equipped with an ac ducted test site from a preliminary con-
outlet on its back, two preliminary tests are ducted test site, be sure to remaximize
needed to determine which configuration pro- the highest emission per 7.2.4. Set the
duces maximum emission levels.
bandwidth and the detector function of
If the EUT power cord is long enough to be the instrument as specified in Section 4.
bundled, the bundle should be secured with Follow the procedure in 11.3.1 to mea-
masking tape o r any other nonconducting sure the final conducted emissions from
material that will not affect the measurements. the EUT.
Power cords of non-EUT equipment do not (7) Record the EUT configuration, mode of
require bundling. Drape ac power cords of non- operation, and cable configuration used
EUT equipment over the rear edge of the table for final conducted emission tests. This

58
ANSI
ELECTRICALAND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

can be done with either diagrams or 230 MHz by setting the scan width con-
photographs. trol on the analyzer t o 20 MHz per divi-
Prepare the final test report data in sion. Adjust the sweep speed control so
accordance with Section 10. the analyzer display is calibrated. Video
filtering is not used during these tests.
NOTE: If ambient radio or TV signals are of such
E3. Radiated Test Set-Up magnitude or spacing that emissions from the
EUT may be hidden, the scan width control can
Preliminary radiated measurements be set to 10 MHz per division or lower to identify
EUT emissions.
should generally follow procedures in
Sections 8 and 11. The measuring Activate the EUT and the measuring
instruments shall conform t o t h e instrument to meet the requirements of
requirements in Section 4. 6.5.
The EUT shall be placed on a turntable Exercise the EUT as specified in 11.1.1.
specified in 5.4.4 and configured as in Equipment connected to the EUT must
steps (2) and (3)of the conducted test be exercised independently.
set-up. Use a procedure such as that contained
Connect the power cords of the EUT in Appendix D t o maximize emissions
and non-EUT equipment t o t h e ac from the EUT that are displayed on the
power source. The EUT power cord is to analyzer and select the EUT configura-
be connected directly to an ac outlet on tion as described in Section 11, mode of
the turntable for these measurements operation, and cable positions to use for
even if t h e EUT normally receives final radiated measurements.
power through another device in the NOTE: A broadband antenna is recommended for
system. preliminary scanning of radiated emissions. It
will be necessary to change to other measurement
NOTE: The monitor shall be powered by two sep- antennas during this process to stay within the
arate sources as follows: (1) an ac outlet on the frequency range of the measurement antenna.
rotator surface, and (2) an ac outlet provided on
the back of the personal computer, if appropriate. The final radiated emission test facility
When a personal computer is equipped with an ac
outlet on its back, two preliminary tests will be shall conform t o the requirements of
needed to determine which configuration pro- 5.4-5.4.2.1. Set the bandwidth and the
duces maximum emission levels. detector function of the instrument as
AC power cords of the EUT or non-EUT specified in Section 4.
equipment do not require bundling. Drape all It is recommended that the highest
ac power cords over the rear edge of the table emission relative to the limit be remaxi-
and route them down onto the turntable sur- mized per 11.2.1.5 before performing
face to the ac outlet. final measurements, even if the EUT is
not moved from a preliminary to a final
radiated test site because slight varia-
E4, Radiated Emission Testing tions in cable position can cause large
variations in signal amplitude. Only
Check the calibration of the measuring slight variation in cable movements
instrument using either an internal cal- should be needed t o remaximize the
ibrator or a known signal level from an highest emission again.
external signal generator. NOTE: The same measurement antenna and dis-
A spectrum analyzer or other instru- tance should be used for remaximizing the high-
ment providing a spectral display is rec- est signal relative to the limit at the final
radiated emission test site.
ommended for preliminary radiated
measurements. Set the 6 dB bandwidth Place the measurement antenna speci-
of t h e measuring instrument t o fied in 4.1.5the distance from the EUT
100 kHz and the detector function to specified in the appropriate regulations.
the peak mode. Set the display
- - on the Follow t h e procedure in 8.3.1.2 and
measuring instrument to enable view- 11.3.2 to measure radiated emissions
ing of emissions between 30 MHz and from the EUT.

59
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

NOTE: It will be necessary to change to other specified by the appropriate regula-


measurement antennas during this process to tions, proceed to step (12). If any of
stay within the frequency range of the measure-
ment antenna. these emission levels exceed the aver-
age limits but comply with the peak
If regulations do not require radiated limits, proceed to step (11).
measurements above 1 GHz, proceed to (11) Set the detector function of the measur-
step (12). If radiated measurements ing instrument to the average mode,
above 1 GHz are required, an instru- using the procedures described in 8.2.3
ment capable of measuring both peak and 11.3.2, and remeasure only those
and average detector function signals emissions from step (10)that complied
shall be used. Set the bandwidth of this with the peak limits but exceeded the
instrument to 1 MHz and the detector average limits.
function to the peak mode. Measure (12) Record the EUT configuration, mode of
emissions above 1 GHz from the EUT operation, and cable positions used for
by following the procedures in 8.2.3 and final radiated emission measurements.
11.3.2. This can be done with either diagrams
(10) If all of the emission levels above 1 GHz or photographs.
as measured with the peak detector (13) Prepare the final test report data in
function comply with the average limit accordance with Section 10.

--
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 lrHz TO 40 GHz (263.4-1991

Appendix F
Verification of LISN Characteristics
The impedance and insertion loss of each o r peripheral, a n d measure t h e
LISN section is to be measured at least once a impedance t o t h a t side of the LISN,
year using the following or equivalent proce- tuning t h e instrument over the fre-
dure. The measurements are to be made at a quency range between 450 k H z and 30
sufficient number of frequencies to obtain a MHz so as t o detect any impedance
smooth curve of impedance with frequency or variations t h a t may be due t o reso-
insertion loss. nances or other imperfections.
Plot the measured impedance curve for
comparison with the tolerances shown
F1. Measuring the Impedance on Fig 1. If any measured value exceeds
of an LISN the permissible error tolerance, the
LISN shall be modified to reduce the
(1) This measurement is to be made with error to an acceptable level.
the LISN installed for use in testing a Repeat step (4) with t h e measuring
device. instrument connected to the other side
(2) To avoid possible introduction of ac of the LISN.
power from the supply line into the If the LISN has more than two sections,
measuring instrument, disconnect the repeat step (4) for all the additional sec-
power connections (both neutral and tions.
hot lines) to the LISN at the line side of If the LISN inductors have magnetic
the LISN. If an rf filter is used to elimi- materials in their construction, make
nate high ambient conducted signals, it additional tests with ac current applied
should remain connected t o the LISN through the LISN to ensure that any
for these tests since the impedance of variability due to effects of line current
the rf filter can have an effect on the can be detected. This can most easily be
LISN impedance. If an rf filter is used, accomplished by shorting together the
disconnect the power connections (both load terminals of the two sides of the
the hot and neutral lines) to the LISN LISN and feeding current into the line
at the line side of the rf filter. terminals from a low-voltage trans-
(3) Connect a 50 R termination on each former of suitable current rating. An ac
port of the LISN. ammeter in series with the circuit can
(4) The preferred instrument for measur- be used to measure the applied current,
ing LISN impedance is a scalar network and a variable transformer can be used
analyzer that can be tuned continuously to regulate the amount of current by
over the frequency range of 450 kHz to varying t h e primary voltage of t h e
30 MHz. A vector impedance meter or transformer. The high-current circuit
vector network analyzer may also be should not have a ground connection.
used. If an instrument that is not con- Note that the impedance values mea-
tinuously tunable is used (such as an rf sured by this technique will be approxi-
bridge that is capable only of measuring mately one-half of those observed in
the impedance at a selected frequency), steps ( 5 ) and (6).
care should be exercised to make mea- The above procedure is to be repeated
surements at frequency intervals close for each LISN used for conducted mea-
enough together, particularly above 20 surements.
MHz, t h a t any resonances can be
detected.
Using a suitable low-impedance F2. Measuring the Insertion Loss
adapter, connect the measuring instru- of an LISN
ment directly to one terminal of the ac
outlet on the load side of the LISN nor- (1) Set up the LISN and test equipment as
mally used to supply power to the EUT shown in Fig A2. Note that the 10 dB

61
ANSI
C63.4-1991 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF RADIO-NOISE EMISSIONS FROM LOW-VOLTAGE

pads are inserted to negate the effects (3) Disconnect the attenuators from the
of possible impedance mismatches with LISN terminals and connect them
the signal generator and the receiver. together as shown dotted on Fig A2.
(2) With t h e equipment connected a s Measure the received signal voltage
shown, measure the received signal (V’)in dB (pV.
voltage V, in dB CpV. (4) Subtract V’ from V, to obtain the inser-
tion loss (in dB)of the LISN.
ANSI
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICEQUIPMENT IN THE RANGE OF 9 kHz TO 40 GHz C63.4-1991

Appendix G
Absorbing Clamp
The absorbing clamp has been developed and (1) The EUT in Fig 14 is replaced with a
is recommended by the International Special signal generator located just inside the
Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) for wall of a screened room or behind a ver-
use in the 30 MHz-300 MHz frequency range tical conducting surface of at least 2.5 m
{CISPR 16 (1987) [6],paragraph 11). The by 2.5 m.
absorbing clamp measuring procedure is based (2) The signal generator is connected to a
upon the assumption that at frequencies above coaxial connector in the wall or conduct-
30 MHz, radio noise is radiated from the power ing surface through a 10 dB pad. On the
line connected to the EUT, and not from the other side of the wall, a single cable is
EUT itself. stretched outside the room from the cen-
ter pin of the connector so as to replace
the power cord in Fig 14.
G1. Description (3) The single cable shall be positioned in
the center of the current transformer
The absorbing clamp shown in Fig 14 utilizes part of the clamp. It shall not be close to
ferrite rings o r cores, which surround the the slit between ferrite ring halves in the
power cord and the shielded line leading to the remainder of the clamp. The calibration
radio-noise meter, to stabilize the impedance procedures used shall be clearly identi-
seen by the EUT at approximately 150 8 in the fied. Where calibration curves (manufac-
frequency range from 30 to 300 MHz, and to turer’s or any other) are used, they shall
attenuate ambient noise originating on the be referenced o r included with t h e
power system. The current transformer uses results .
similar ferrite cores or rings, which are linked (4) Adjust the position of the clamp along
by a one-turn loop feeding the coaxial cable to the cable for maximum received signal at each
the measuring instrument. The voltage read on frequency. The calibration is determined by
the measuring instrument is proportional, at comparing the receiver indication with the out-
any frequency, to the rf current on the power put of the signal generator, while taking the
cord at the location of the current transformer. attenuator into account.

You might also like