The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Shah Bano in a case challenging Muslim personal law granting her alimony, which the Muslim community felt encroached on Muslim sharia law. This led to the formation of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board in 1973. In another case, the Supreme Court allowed petitioners living on pavements and in slums in Bombay to stay, recognizing the right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21. The court also ruled that brain mapping, lie detector tests, and narco analysis are unconstitutional when conducted without consent. In a third case, the court recognized transgender rights, treating transgender people as a third gender and ordering reservations in jobs, education, and amenities for
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Shah Bano in a case challenging Muslim personal law granting her alimony, which the Muslim community felt encroached on Muslim sharia law. This led to the formation of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board in 1973. In another case, the Supreme Court allowed petitioners living on pavements and in slums in Bombay to stay, recognizing the right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21. The court also ruled that brain mapping, lie detector tests, and narco analysis are unconstitutional when conducted without consent. In a third case, the court recognized transgender rights, treating transgender people as a third gender and ordering reservations in jobs, education, and amenities for
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Shah Bano in a case challenging Muslim personal law granting her alimony, which the Muslim community felt encroached on Muslim sharia law. This led to the formation of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board in 1973. In another case, the Supreme Court allowed petitioners living on pavements and in slums in Bombay to stay, recognizing the right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21. The court also ruled that brain mapping, lie detector tests, and narco analysis are unconstitutional when conducted without consent. In a third case, the court recognized transgender rights, treating transgender people as a third gender and ordering reservations in jobs, education, and amenities for