Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modules 1, 2 & 3
Legal Studies
BMGPP
August 2004
Origins of Law 15
Guidance Notes 17
Criminal Liability 17
Absolute Duties 17
Practicable Duties 18
Common Law 18
Common Law 19
Civil Liability 19
Tort 19
Tort of Negligence 19
Employer’s Duties 22
Employee’s Duties 24
Defences 24
Compensation 25
Improvement Notices 34
Prohibition Notices 35
Offences 35
Industrial Tribunals 36
Sources of Information 54
This question is asked at every safety seminar. The response is usually the
same - a long silence! Eventually delegate‘s attempts give the following
information:
• To protect employers
• To protect employees
• To protect investment
Each is correct hut only tells part of the story. To talk about managing health
and safety, there must be a common understanding of what the term means.
The best way to clarify the definition is to provide a model of Safety and
Health. This model is capable of assisting in the solution of real life problems
and as the basis for safety management courses.
A simple version is shown below with notes to discuss each element of the
model. After the notes the model is redrawn in its more complex form. The
model is an easily remembered tool, which will assist to manage health and
safety.
UNSAFE UNSAFE
WORKING HAZARDOUS WORKING
CONDITIONS ENVIRONMENT PRACTICES
RISK
SITUATION
ACCIDENT OR
INCIDENT
INVESTIGATION
REPORT
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CORRECTIVE
PROCEDURES WITH
STANDARD
OPERATING
PROCEDURES
The important point about the word ‗unplanned‘ is that it allows consideration
of both health and safety issues. People readily equate accidents with safety
- or rather the Lack of it! Accidents and health however seem somehow
different to most people. If we accept that the definition of an accident is ―an
undesired and unplanned event‖ then health problems do fit the definition.
Nobody sets out deliberately to contract silicosis; dermatitis or work related
upper limb disorders. When these conditions occur they are unplanned
events: they are accidents.
The major difference between health issues and safety issues is one of
timescale. Safety accidents occur very quickly and recovery time is normally
short. Health accidents occur slowly and recovery time is equally a lengthy
process.
Manger are concerned with determining the causes of accidents and taking
corrective action to prevent further occurrences. This is reactive
management - the manager reacting to the accident or incident situation.
Interesting though accidents are, they are not the prime concern of managers.
Accident prevention is the prime concern. This means that attention must be
paid to the causes of accidents - namely the hazards of the situation. This is
proactive management. In an ideal world there would be no hazards and
hence no accidents. We live in a less than ideal world and the total
elimination of hazards is an impossible dream. What managers must do is to
reduce to an acceptable level the risk of any hazard turning into an accident.
The words -hazard and risk – are considered on more detail.
(b) Hazard
Unsafe working conditions are those physical conditions of the workplace that
render it unsafe. The principal means the manager has for removing such
unsafe conditions is to ensure that their staff carry out regular safety
inspections. Rather more formal is carrying out a safety audit. A safety
auditor checks that documented standards and procedures are being adhered
to and examines records and certificates. A certificate, which is due to expire
shortly, is an indication that an unsafe condition may exist. Similarly, a
record, which shows that a particular piece of machinery has not been
examined, recently will indicate a possible unsafe condition.
Unsafe working practices are those practices, which human beings perform
which are hazardous. Included here are unsafe omissions, the practices that
human beings do not perform but which can be hazardous to them. Unsafe
acts include rushing, taking short cuts, horseplay and the abuse of drink or
drugs in the workplace. Unsafe omissions include the failure to wear
protective equipment or the failure to follow a safe system of work.
Unsafe acts may be reduced by the application of many techniques. For the
model the techniques can be limited to six and to remember them use the
mnemonic M A S T E R that expands to:
M Motivation
A Awareness
S Supervision
T Training
E Education
(c) Risk
Risk has been defined as ―the chance of loss arising from exposure to the
hazard‖ (Gilbertson 1991). The same source has defined magnitude of risk
as ―the likelihood of an event resulting in loss coupled with the likely severity
of the outcome‖.
A trailing cable is a hazard and the associated risk is the chance of a trip or a
fall over the cable, accompanied by a degree of injury. The magnitude of risk
is an estimate of how likely this is to happen with an assessment of the likely
severity of injury. The same hazard may present different magnitudes of risk.
For example:
As a manager the expectation is that your action will reduce hazards in both
proactive and reactive situations. Using assessments of magnitude of risk
allows you to attach priorities to your intended actions, tackling the high risk
problems first.
(d) Investigation
• Witness statements, diagrams and job cards reveal that the injured
person was working on a ladder at the time of the accident.
Problem solved decisions made confirm - the cause of the accident is a fall
from a ladder.
WRONG!
The cause of the accident is why the individual fell from it!
Another easy trap to fall into is that of finding someone to blame. During an
investigation the only criterion is to assemble facts and come up with a likely
cause of the accident. Blame is not a concern and personal feelings must be
subdued. It is for others, possibly a Court of Law to allocate blame, not
managers.
This aspect of the model is crucial to managing health and safety issues.
Report writing skills are necessary as are the analytical skills to arrive at
acceptable recommendations.
IDENTIFYING
HAZARDOUS
CONDITIONS
UNSAFE UNSAFE
WORKING HAZARDOUS WORKING
CONDITIONS ENVIRONMENT PRACTICES
Examination Motivation
of records Awareness
Previous Supervision
Inspections Training
Audits Education
Rules/Regulations
RISK
SITUATION
Likely Loss
Severity of Outcome
Risk Assessment
Completed
Controls Established
Documentation
Published
ACCIDENT OR
INCIDENT
Safety – Short Term
Health – Long Term
INVESTIGATION
Do Not Assume
Do Not Blame
REPORT
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CORRECTIVE
PROCEDURES WITH
STANDARD
OPERATING
PROCEDURES
The management of health and safety must be considered an integral part of‘
any manager‘s responsibility being given equal priority with other
responsibilities. The ultimate goal in managing safety is to carry out business
without risk to the health or safety of anyone. This zero risk situation is
unlikely ever to be attained due to human influences but the aim must be one
of continuous improvement to minimise risks in the workplace.
Resources are limited in all management functions even for health and safety.
The credibility of a safety management programme would be severely
damaged by setting objectives which place an undue burden upon the
organisation; or setting objectives which cannot be justified on legal, financial
or moral grounds. It may not be possible to demonstrate cost effectiveness
but the convincing case must exist. When setting objectives it is essential to
be proactive and considered the true sources of problems. For example, it
would be wasteful to set an objective to have all employees trained in
chemical handling techniques if the basic problem is automate controls or
remove the substances from the process.
Health and Safety at Work is achieved by the prevention of accidents and ill
health. Prevention should be given the same priority as other matters such
as quality, progress and profit, for the following reasons:
Humanitarian
Past experience has shown that most accidental deaths, injuries and illness
could have been prevented. There are few people who would not care if their
action or inaction was shown to result in suffering by someone else.
Legal
There is a vast amount of health and safety legislation covering all aspects of
work, which places health, safety and environmental duties on employers and
employees. Additionally countries have a legal system for compensation of
persons who have suffered injury or ill health.
Costs
- Many accidental losses are not recognised as such, the losses are
simply absorbed into various budgets;
Insurance
Many of the cost factors listed above are not covered by insurance. A recent
study showed that uninsured losses were between 8 to 36 times greater than
insured losses.
1 Unit Injury,
Insured Damage, Loss
Costs Health
8 - 36 Unit
Uninsured
Costs Legal costs
Clerical effort
Fines
Production delays
Investigation time
Product and material
damage
Plant and building damage
Tool and equipment damage
Expenditure on energy
supplies
Clearing site
Overtime working and
temporary labour
Supervisors‘ time
Loss of expertise/experience
Law can be defined as the ―rules of human conduct imposed upon and
enforced among the members of a given state". The purpose of law is to
ensure some form of social order. Rules of law are drawn up to ensure that
members of a society may live and work together in an orderly and peaceful
manner.
Statute and Common Law are applicable in the field of health and safety.
Both types of law have originated over the centuries from the Common Law of
Scotland, England and Wales.
Origins of Law
In Anglo-Saxon times there were different legal systems in all locations parts
of the United Kingdom. The laws were based on local customs and traditions
with local courts of law where cases were heard. These courts dealt with
criminal offences such as murder, theft and violence and also civil claims
concerning ownership or possession of land, goods, chattels or cattle. The
procedures in these courts were primitive. Trial by ordeal was not
uncommon. This may have involved ducking the defendant in a pool to
determine their guilt or innocence.
Present English law developed after the Norman Conquest, similar processes
evolved in Scotland. Representatives of the King were sent out from
Westminster to check on local administration. These representatives made
records of the land and wealth of the county, collected taxes and adjudicated
in disputes brought before them. In the reign of Henry 11 (1154-89) the
system was formalised and the country divided into geographic circuits that
the itinerant Justices travelled on a regular basis. On completing their circuits
the Justices returned to Westminster and discussed their cases.
Initially, the judges applied the law arising from local customs and traditions
but gradually they began to accept the reasonable customs and reject the
rest. At the same time, whenever a new problem of law was resolved, a rule
was formed and all other judges subsequently followed this. This eventually
developed and led to the establishment of a uniform pattern of law throughout
England with an independent system in Scotland following a similar process.
‗Common Law ‗, therefore, evolved from the varied and different customs of
Scotland, England and Wales.
Statute Law consists of Acts, which are debated and made, in Parliament, or
the delegated assemblies, within the parameters of delegated powers. An
Act of Parliament may provide the framework for the objectives of the
legislation that can then be developed further by the addition of regulations.
The most important Statute in the area of health and safety is the Health and
Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. Section 15 of this act enables new health and
safety regulations to be made under delegated powers. The Noise at Work
Regulations 1989 and The Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 are examples
of such regulations, which are usually introduced by the Secretary of State for
Employment in consultation with the Health and Safety Commission, (HSC)
and industry.
Regulations are written in the same complicated, legal jargon as the statutes
that enable them to be in place. To define the regulations in language that is
easier to understand by employers approved codes of
practice and guidance notes are issued.
These Codes of Practice are issued by the HSC (Health and Safety
Commission) and approved by the Secretary of State. They provide practical
guidance on the requirements, which are set out in the legislation. Although
approved codes of practice are not legally binding, they are used as a
minimum standard against which judgements can be made in a court of law.
Guidance Notes
The Health and Safety Commission (HSC) or the Health and Safety Executive
(HSE) issue guidance notes, as opinions on good practice. They are not
legally binding but they are also used in court as a minimum standard for
benchmarks in decision-making.
Criminal Liability
In the field of health and safety as covered by the Health and Safety at Work
Act etc 1974, a breach of Statute Law is a criminal offence. The accused is
liable to be prosecuted before a criminal court and if found guilty, can be
sentenced by custody or fine or both. In areas of health and safety this
historically has taken the form of a fine rather than imprisonment. Criminal
offences relating to health and safety at work arise from a failure to comply
with legal duties imposed by statutes or regulations.
Legal duties are also referred to as legal standards. There are a number of
duties imposed by statute on employers in health and safety to ensure that
they respond to hazards in certain ways. These are:
• Absolute duties;
• The duty to do what is practicable; and
• The duty to take steps that are reasonably practicable.
Absolute Duties
It is a statutory duty that the employer must take safety precautions when it is
deemed that the risk of injury is inevitable; if they do not they fail in their duty.
For example, regulation 5(1) of the provision and Use of Work Equipment
Regulations 1992 states that ‗Every employer shall ensure that work
equipment is so constructed or adapted as to be suitable for the purpose for
which it is to be used or provided‘. Absolute duties use the words shall or
must.
Practicable Duties
It is a statutory duty that the employer must take safety precautions ‗so far as
is practicable‘. This means that safety precautions must be taken if it is
possible to do so despite the fact that implementation might be difficult,
inconvenient or expensive. For example, in Regulation 10 of the
Woodworking Machines Regulations 1974, it is a requirement that there shall
be provided around every woodworking machine sufficient clear and
unobstructed space to enable, in so far as is thereby practicable, the work
being done at the machine to be done without risk of injury to persons
employed‘.
It is a statutory duty that the employer must take safety precautions ‗so far as
is reasonably practicable‘. In this instance, the employer has to weigh up the
risks involved in a particular situation against the costs of removing or
reducing the risk. The requirement to be reasonably practicable has legal
consequences but is evaluated against economic and moral consequences.
The Duty of Reasonable Care
Common Law
Common Law is the traditional, judge made law which has not been
superseded by Acts of Parliament. Common Law is accumulated case law,
which is underpinned by the doctrine of Judicial Precedent. When a judge
decides a case, they state reasons for the decision and this reasoning will set
the precedent for other judges to follow in future, similar case circumstances
within the hierarchy of the court structure. The principles and rules of
Common Law are, therefore, contained in the previous decisions of Courts,
which are recorded in the law reports, gazettes and Hansard.
The main duty of Common Law is that everyone owes a duty to everyone else
to take reasonable care so as not to cause him or her to suffer a reasonably
foreseeable loss. Failure to comply with this Common Law duty usually gives
rise to Civil Liability. The area of Common Law most relevant to health and
safety at work is that of the Tort of Negligence.
Civil Liability
Civil liability arises from an act or omission that the law regards as giving an
individual, company or organisation the right to present a legal claim against
another.
Tort
A ‘tort‘ is a civil wrong. It allows a person who has suffered loss or damage
(the plaintiff) due to the act or omission of another person (the defendant), to
recover damages in the form of compensation from the defendant in order to
restore the plaintiff, as near as is possible, to his original position (in a
financial claim) before the tort occurred.
Tort of Negligence
In order to succeed in a civil action for the tort of negligence, the plaintiff must
prove:
Res ipsa loquitur, let the facts speak for themselves, is used occasionally by
the courts. The circumstances presented to the court being such that they
obviously indicate negligence. It is then up to the defendant to prove that
there was no negligence.
When duties in statute law are breached, the usual sanction is punishment in
the criminal courts. If the breach of statutory duty results in injury or illness to
an employee, the employee may in some circumstances be able to sue for
compensation on the basis of that breach.
In order to succeed in an action for breach of statutory duty, the plaintiff must
prove that:-
• The statute was designed to prevent the loss, injury, disease or death
in question;
Not every breach of statutory duty is actionable as a tort. For example, the
Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 precludes civil liability as
a result of breach. If an injury occurs the plaintiff has to first prove
negligence in order to obtain compensation.
CRIMINAL CIVIL
Remedy: Remedy:
Prosecution by the State Action for damages
Action brought in the Civil Courts
Prosecution in the Criminal Courts
Purpose: Purpose:
Punishment Compensation
Only the court can withdraw action Action can be withdrawn at any time
once it has started
Indictable cases are tried by jury Nearly all cases are heard by a
judge alone
Employer’s Duties
2. The employer must show the standard of care expected from the
REASONABLE and PRUDENT employer. They must keep reasonably
abreast of developing knowledge and not be too slow to apply it. The
employer‘s duty of care is owed to each employee as an individual.
Therefore, a higher standard of care is owed to any employee who is
particularly vulnerable.
servant. The master is responsible for the acts of his servant. People are
servants in the course of their employment when they are carrying out
activities for the benefit of their employer. If an employee, whilst acting in
the course of their employment, negligently injures another employee, then
the employer may be liable for the injury. The injured party would bring
their action for damages against the employer on the grounds that the
employer was VICARIOUSLY LIABLE for the negligence of their employee.
It must be noted that an employer is not liable for torts committed by their
servants if those servants were not acting in the course of their employment.
Employee’s Duties
Defences
If it can be shown that the injury was the sole fault of the employee, then the
employer may not be liable.
2. Volenti Non Fit Injuria - ‗To one who is willing no harm done‘.
The employee agreed to run the risks associated with the employment,
therefore, the employer cannot be held totally responsible.
An employee has to prove that the breach of statute was the predominant
cause of their injury and not their own failure to act in the interests of their
personal health and safety.
4. Contributory Negligence
5. Limitation Act
All civil rights of action must he started within the time limits laid down by the
Limitation Act 1980.
Compensation
Health and safety legislation, prior to the Health and Safety at Work etc Act
1974, consisted of a series of statutes that had been introduced to meet a
need highlighted by an accident, experience or disaster. The most significant
pieces of early health and safety legislation were:
Established 4 official factory inspectors for the whole of England and Wales
who were given powers of entry and enforcement.
Eliminated the distinction between the different types of factory and laid down
provisions for health, safety and welfare at work
The Factories Act 1961 and the Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act
1963
Components of both of these acts are still in force covering the health, safety
and welfare of large groups of workers.
All of the above legislation contributed to and provided the framework for
legislation that was subsequently formulated and introduced in the United
Kingdom in1974. The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 is based on
the proposals made in the Report of the Committee on Safety and Health at
Work, commonly known as The Robens Report. This report was published in
1972. It proposed a series of changes in the law and
administration relating to occupational health and
safety at work.
Employers;
Employees;
Manufacturers of industrial products;
The self employed; and
Occupiers of buildings where people worked.
2. The Act would provide the framework of health and safety legislation to
which more specific regulations and approved codes of practise could be
added after consultation with industry.
3. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) would replace all other
inspectorates and co-ordinate legal enforcement
5. The HSE Inspectors should be given wider powers, including the issue of
improvement and prohibition notices.
This Act was at introduction revolutionary in the field of health and safety
legislation. For the first time, a system has been designed to deal with health
and safety in the workplace, applicable to all groups of workers and protection
of the public from work activities. Major principles of the Robens Report have
been incorporated into the legislative framework to promote, stimulate and
encourage high standards of health and safety at work.
2. Much of the content of the Act deals with the administrative bodies that
have been established to deal with the powers of inspection and
enforcement. The HSC consists of representatives from both sides of
industry and local authorities. It takes over the responsibility for
developing health and safety polices from government departments,
although it does need the consent of the Secretary of State for
Employment to authorise new regulations and approved codes of practise.
3. The HSE is appointed by the HSC and is responsible for enforcing legal
duties and providing advice to industry. The HSE Inspectorate enforce the
legal standards and have the power to prosecute.
Section 1
The aims of the 1. Secure the health, safety and welfare of people at work.
Act are to: 2. Protect others against health and safety risks arising
from work activities.
3. Control the acquisition, keeping and use of explosive
and highly flammable substances.
4. Control the emission of noxious or offensive substances
into the atmosphere
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Duties Relating to It is the duty of people who are in control of premises but
Premises do not have any employees to provide safe premises, plant
and substances.
Section 5
Section 6
Section 7
Section 8
Section 9
Section 10- 14
Section 15
Section 16- 17
Section 18
Section 19
Section 20 & 25
Section 21 – 24
Section 33
Section 36
Section 37
Section 40
Section 41
Section 47
Section 48
Section 52 & 53
The powers of Inspectors are defined under Section 20 of the Health and
Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The basic function of the Inspectorate is to
enforce the Act with any new Regulations, in the workplace. An Inspector
may:
10. Serve Improvement and Prohibition Notices, which may give rise to
prosecution.
Improvement Notices
Improvement notices are issued under Section 21 of the Health and Safety at
Work etc Act 1974. They are issued if the Inspector is of the opinion that a
person has contravened one or more statutory provisions and that the
contravention is likely to be repeated. An Improvement Notice states:
A person on whom an Improvement Notice has been served has the right of
appeal to an Industrial Tribunal within 21 days. If an appeal is lodged, the
Improvement Notice is suspended immediately until the appeal is heard.
Prohibition Notices
Prohibition Notices are issued under Section 22 of the Health and Safety at
Work etc. Act 1974. They are issued if the Inspector is of the opinion that a
person or people arc at risk of immediate serious personal injury from an
activity. There need not be any contravention of any legal requirement. A
Prohibition Notice states:
A person on whom a Prohibition Notice has been served also has the right of
appeal to an Industrial Tribunal, however, because the Inspector is of the
opinion that risk of serious personal injury is involved, the Prohibition Notice is
not suspended at any time.
5) Do Nothing
Offences
- Forge a document
Industrial Tribunals
Industrial tribunals deal with the following health and safety matters:
• Failure to pay for time off when training or carrying out their functions;
Workplace - Definition
―Workplace‖ means, any premises or part of premises which are not domestic
premises and are made available to any person as a place of work, and
includes:
- any place within the premises to which such person has access while
at work;
a) Means of Transport
All operational ships, boats, hovercraft, aircraft, trains and road vehicles,
except that Regulation 13 applies to aircraft, trains and road vehicles when
Mines, quarries or other mineral extraction site, including those off-shore are
not within the scope of this legislation, they do not apply to any related
workplace on the same site.
Agricultural or forestry workplaces that are outdoors and away from the
undertaking‘s main buildings are partly excluded. The exception is for the
requirements of sanitary conveniences, washing facilities and drinking water,
Regulations 20-22 apply, implemented ―so far as is reasonably practicable‖.
Employers‘ Duties
Employers have a general duty under Section 2 of the Health and Safety at
Work etc Act 1974 to ensure, ―so far as is reasonably practicable‖, the health,
safety and welfare of their employees at work. Persons in control of non-
domestic premises also have a duty under Section 4 of the Act towards
people who are not their employees but use their premises. The regulations
expand on these duties. They are intended to protect the health and safety of
everyone in the workplace and to ensure that adequate welfare facilities are
provided for people at work.
a) Temperature
During working hours, the temperature in all workplaces inside buildings shall
be reasonable.
A method of heating or cooling shall not be used which results in the escape
into a workplace of fumes, gas or vapour of such character and to such extent
that they are likely to be injurious or offensive to any person.
other factors such as air movement and relative humidity. The temperatures
refer to readings taken using an ordinary dry bulb thermometer, close to
workstations, at working height and away from windows.
b) Space
The number of persons employed at a time in any workroom shall not be such
that the amount of cubic space allowed for each is less than 11 cubic metres.
In calculating for this the amount of cubic space in any room, no space more
than 4.2 metres from the floor shall be taken into account and where a room
contains a gallery, the gallery shall be treated, for the purposes of the
calculation, as if it were partitioned off from the remainder of the room and
formed a separate room.
In workplaces where males work, there shall be at least one suitable water
closet for every 25 males.
Number of
people at
work
01 - 05 1 1
06 - 25 2 2
26 - 50 3 2
51 - 75 4 4
76 - 100 5 4
e) Washing Facilities
Where work activities result in heavy soiling of the face, hands and forearms,
the number of washing stations should be increased to one for every 10
people at work (or fraction of 10) up to 50 people and one extra for every
additional 20 people (or fraction of 20) over 50 people.
Where facilities provided for workers are also used by members of the public,
the number of conveniences and washing stations specified above, should be
increased as necessary to ensure that workers can use the facilities without
undue delay.
f) Lighting
Every workplace shall have suitable and sufficient lighting by natural light so
far as is reasonably practicable. In addition to the provision of suitable and
sufficient artificial light, emergency lighting must be provided. In the event of
failure of artificial light and where persons at work are specially exposed to
danger the emergency lighting should be activated automatically or by alarm
systems.
i) Drinking Water
j) Traffic Routes
Every floor in the workplace and the surface of every traffic route shall be of a
construction that is suitable for the purpose for which it is used. The
requirements include that there shall be no hole or slope, be uneven and
slippery. The floor surface shall not expose any person to a risk to health or
safety.
Suitable and effective measures shall be taken to prevent any person from
falling a distance likely to cause personal injury. Suitable and effective
measures must be in place to eliminate the likelihood of any person from
being struck by a falling object likely to cause personal injury. Where there is
a risk to health and safety it shall be clearly indicated by signage where
appropriate. Every tank, pit or structure where there is a risk of a person
falling into a dangerous substance shall be securely covered or fenced.
Doors and gates shall be suitably constructed fitted with any necessary safety
device deemed appropriate. Sliding doors or gates shall not comply unless
they have a device to prevent them running off tracks. Any upward opening
door or gate must have a device to prevent it falling back. Any powered door
or gate has an effective automatic feature that prevents it causing injury by
trapping any person.
These shall function safely, be equipped with any necessary safety devices
and fitted with one or more emergency stop controls.
Sufficient and suitable facilities shall be provided for any person at work to
change clothing. In all cases where the person has to wear special clothing
for the purpose of work, the person must, for reasons of health or propriety,
be allowed to change in a separate room designated for changing. Separate
facilities for use by males and females must be provided.
• Every employer shall ensure that every workplace which is under his
control and where any of his employees work complies with all
requirement of the regulations which applies to that workplace.
Section 2 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 places a duty on the
employer to ensure, ―so far as is reasonably practicable‖, the health, safety
and welfare of all their employees. This includes provision of a safe system
of work and of information, instruction, training and supervision.
The person in control of the workplace has an obligation under the regulations
to protect visitors to that workplace for example service engineers, from
hazards in that workplace which are addressed in the regulations. These
obligations extend fully, in the case of those concerned with safety rather than
welfare, to all persons.
Under Section 2 (3) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, all
employers who employ 5 or more employees have to compile a written health
and safety policy. In the case of employers engaged in a number of different
activities or where the operations are geographically widespread, the policy
may require formulation on more than one level. The highest management
level should compile the central principles of the policy while sub groups or
operational units interpret the policy in written form to suit their local needs.
The policy falls readily into three sections.
• Set out line management health and safety responsibilities with the
communication channels and showing the contribution that
employees can make.
2. The Organisation
It would be advantageous to use job titles rather than name the people
responsible the latter could cause reprint problems on staff changes. A
solution might be to list the responsible people in an appendix that could
easily be reprinted.
3. The Arrangements
• What is to be controlled?
• What standard is required?
• How is the standard to be achieved?
• Who is responsible?
• What training is required?
• When are these activities to be conducted?
• What records are to be kept and where?
• Who is to monitor, how and when?
• To whom are reports to be forwarded?
Once written, the health and safety policy has to be implemented throughout
the company to ensure that adequate health and safety standards are
achieved and maintained. Constant monitoring and publicising of the policy
increases individual employee awareness and emphasises the employer‘s
positive commitment to the health, safety and welfare of the workforce.
To ensure that adequate health and safety standards are achieved and
maintained:
3. A check list should ensure that all relevant items are covered.
1. All employees and visitors must be provided with a copy of the general
statement
4. To ensure that all employees understand their role within the policy,
the relevant sections should be discussed with them by their manager;
and
However, the health and safety policies of many companies do not meet the
written or practical requirements necessary to convince HSE inspectors of
employer‘s commitments to health and safety. Inspectors have identified a
number of defects, which are common to many Health and Safety Policies.
Common Defects
9. Design safety.
19. The procedures for dealing with identified hazards associated with the
normal work of the company.
21. Safe systems and methods of work for all company activities including
maintenance and cleaning machinery and plant.
25. Facilities for the use and storage of highly flammable liquids, LPG and
other flammable or explosive substances.
Regulation 1
Regulation 2
Interpretation and Defined terms used within the following Regulations. The
Application Regulations do not apply to the master and crew of a sea-
going ship.
Regulation 3
Regulation 4
Regulation 5
Regulation 7
Defence The accused will need to prove that they took all
reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to
comply with the requirements of the Regulations.
Regulation 8
Sources of Information
An employer has a legal duty to provide health and safety information under
Section 2 (2) (c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
1. Legislation
3. Guidance Notes
These have no automatic legal standing but as they offer guidance which has
been assessed by an official body, they can be used as a minimum standard
in a court of law.
5. British Standards
A large number of these relate to safety, such as, BS 5304 Safe guarding of
Machinery and are an excellent source of detailed technical information.
These often produce codes of practice, such as, British Standard 7670 (16th
Edition) which deals with electrical installation as well as a series of other
publications.
7. Manufacturers
Under Section 6 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974,
manufacturers, suppliers and importers have an obligation to provide
information, which enables the users of their articles and substances to use
them safely.
9. Independent Advisors
11. Publications
12. Posters
13. Signs
14. Signals
Various warnings and informative audible and visible signals are often
installed.
Information should be available from the company Health and Safety Policy,
task analysis data, work study records, direct observation, direct experience,
safety audits and accident investigation records, to name but a few.
All are implemented under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and apply
to most workplaces and work people. The objective of the legislation is to
improve the problems caused by around one thousand deaths, 1.5 million
injuries, 0.75 million reportable accidents, 2 million people with illnesses
believed to be work-related and 20 million lost working days. All this is
believed to cost around £5 billion a year.
Employers
As a result of the six Regulations, which are often called ―daughter directives‖,
many Health and Safety Laws were repealed, including major parts of the
Factories Act; the Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act; and many other
laws relating to specialised industries, such as herring curing, sack cleaning,
tanning and sanitary conveniences.
Application
The original Regulation came into force on 1 January 1993 under the
provisions of HSWA 1974 to enable the UK to implement the so called
―Framework Directive‖, which was made under the Treaty of Rome. It called
upon member states to encourage management to improve their attitudes to
health and safety. The schedule to these Regulations enforces the duty of
employers to consult and provide facilities and assistance to Safety
Representatives.
Serious Danger
Information
Where two or more employers share a workplace, each must co-operate with
the other.
- Upon recruitment;
- When job or responsibility is changed;
- When new equipment or technology is introduced;
- Whenever the system of work changes.
The employer is also required to give refresher training where appropriate; all
training must be carried out during normal working hours, although if it is
necessary to train outside normal hours it must be considered an extension of
the employees‘ time at work.
Employees‘ Duties
Temporary Staff
Application
A major difference you must note is that these Regulations cover all
workplaces, including factories, offices, shops, schools, hospitals, hotels, etc,
although certain specialised areas such as construction sites, mineral
extraction, ships and certain outdoor workplaces have exclusion from parts of
the Regulations.
Main Requirements
The main requirements of Regulations 1-25 are that the workplace must:
— Be well maintained;
— Have doors, gates, escalators and any moving walkways which are
safe;
Standards
For ventilation, it recommends that the fresh air rate should not fall below 5 to
8 litres per second per occupant and the acceptable temperature should be a
minimum of 16 degrees C (or 13 degrees C where severe physical work is
carried out). No maximum temperature is specified but where the
temperature cannot be controlled by other means, personal protective
equipment may be used.
Lighting levels are not quantified in the ACOP and only general guidance is
given.
The space recommendations are 11 cubic metres of space per person and
examples of calculations are given in the code.
Application
The regulations came into force on 1 January 1993 and place upon
employers duties related to keeping work equipment safe and adequately
guarded. It revokes other legislation related to these subjects but has been
superceded by further regulations dated 1998.
Main Provisions
— The employer must provide information and training to those who use
equipment;
You can see that the main objective of these Regulations is to ensure that
work equipment is safe for use. It replaces many parts of the Factories Act
relating to dangerous machinery; you should pay particular attention to
Regulation 11 which deals with dangerous parts of machinery.
Regulations 22 to 24 towards the end of the ACOP require that the employer
shall ensure that work equipment has, where necessary, appropriate and very
clearly visible Health and Safety markings, which must be clearly understood;
they can be to national or international standards such as the Safety Signs
Regulations.
• RISK REMOVAL
• RISK REDUCTION
• RISK TRANSFER
Risk removal and risk reduction are performed under the direction of
management after assessing the risks and prioritising actions.
Whatever technique is used the approach should be the same six-point team
procedure.
Once a consensus has been achieved as to the nature of the variance and its
likely causes, a team action plan should be created which will reduce it. This
will be based firmly on risk assessments and control strategies.
Once the gap has been determined and action agreed then the objectives
should be set. This should be done using Behavioural formats and the
SMART criteria.
A SMART objective has a time-limit and the review date should be set just
after this. If the objective has been met and the variance has disappeared
then congratulations and praise are due all round. If the objective has not
been met and a variance still exists then cycle back to Step 1 with a ―new‖
gap and begin the process again.
This six-step process can be closely aligned with classical team performance
theories. One of the most famous is Tuckerman‘s Theory of Group
Dynamics. He describes four stages which a group will pass through before
achieving objectives. They represent various levels of co-operation and
effectiveness.
EFFECTIVENESS
CO-OPERATION
PERFORMING
NORMING
STORMING
FORMING
CONFLICT
TIME
UNPRODUCTIVE EFFECTIVE
Forming
This is the stage where the variances are identified and quantified. The
magnitude of the safety requirements can be established.
Storming
The analysis and agreement of the variance is completed here. The reason
for the existence of the variance should also be confirmed.
Norming
The variance is further analysed and alternative for solution identified. The
course of action should now be agreed in principle to enable the variance to
be closed.
Performing
At the review points it is essential to know how effective the policy has been.
The following questions and techniques are relevant: