kept d u r i n g his early contact w i t h Dr Verrier Elwin the t r i b a l folk of Central India. A few years ago he published a col- IN Dr V e r r i e r E l w i n ' s death of the other sections of the popula- lection of non-anthropological es- I n d i a n ethnography has sustain- tion. A n y other p o l i c y i s w r o n g . says w h i c h i n c l u d e d one on Sher- ed a grievous loss, and the t r i b a l It is a t r i b u t e to the b r e a d t h of lock Holmes and another on the people of India have lost a sincere E l w i n ' s m i n d that, i n his later human nose. and well-meaning friend. E l w i n came w r i t i n g s , he adopted a more reali- to ethnography from tile Immanitres stic a t t i t u d e to the p r o b l e m of the He was indeed a gifted, sensitive at Oxford. and had no formal t r a i n - tribals in India. and dedicated man, and in his death ing in a n t h r o p o l o g y . As he has E l w i n wrote delightfully. His India and B r i t a i n have lost a 'bri- himself stated. " I d i d not come t o " L e a v e s from an I n d i a n J u n g l e " dge-builder.' t r i b a l India (now exactly twenty- seven years ago) from a school of anthropology, but f r o m G a n d h i j i ' s ashram at Sevagram". (Preface to Philosophy for Nefa, 2nd edition. Shillong.1959). " T h e M u r i a s and T h e i r G h o t u l " , " R e l i g i o n of an I n d i a n T r i b e " , "The Raiga". "The Hondo H i g h l a n d e r " , and his other works are c o n t r i b u - tions of lasting significance to the descriptive ethnography of I n d i a n tribes. It was indeed fortunate that he wrote so p r o l i f i c a l l y . for that is how he was able to f i l l some c r y i n g gaps in the ethnography of middle India. Orissa and the N E F A . Elwin wrote so well that he made anthropology popular among the general p u b l i c . T h i s p o p u l a r i t y was also p a r t l y due to a focussing of attention on marriage, sex and art, and to the neglect of subjects of serious professional concern such as k i n s h i p . economics, law and politics. In the last four decades a n t h r o p o l o g y has become increa- singly professionalized and the days of the amateur-anthropologist are gone for ever. E l w i n is indeed one of the last and most distinguished of his k i n d .
Elwin loved the t r i b a l s and this
is what endeared h i m to them and to m a n y others i n c l u d i n g nationa- list leaders. Hut his concern for them made h i m a passionate p a r t i - san' as is seen f r o m his w a r - t i m e pamphlet. "Loss of N e r v e " . In it he pleaded strongly for p r o t e c t i n g the t r i b a l s from contact w i t h the more sophisticated people from the plains. He was attacked for his views and he subsequently m o d i f i e d them to some extent. The isolation of t r i b a l people is no longer a practicable p o l i c y even if it seems the most obvious one. and the o n l y t i l i n g to do is to extend education and other facilities to the tribes to enable them to advance to the level 466