Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhyd
Abstract
In this study, morphology and functional properties of commercial native corn, potato and tapioca starches were evaluated. Morphological
study with light and scanning electron microscopy revealed that these starches had unique granule characteristics. The starches were
observed to be almost insoluble in water at 20 8C but upon heating to 70 8C, they were solubilized in water to an extent of 3.89, 13.49 and
14.36% for corn, potato and tapioca starches, respectively. Among these, corn starch held less water as compared to potato and tapioca
starches. The viscosity of starches was almost same at low concentration (0.1%, w/v) but increased curvilinearly with the increase in
concentration to 0.5% in ascending order for tapioca, corn and potato starches and at high concentration (5%, w/v) they showed shear
thinning behaviour. Corn starch exhibited high viscosity stability to shear. The pasting curves of starches during cooking, using rapid visco-
amylograph indicated that corn showed higher degree of crystallinity since it gelatinized apparently at higher temperature. Other pasting
properties of starches like peak viscosity, final viscosity and breakdown were higher for potato compared to corn followed by tapioca but the
setback tendency gave an opposite trend. Potato starch gelled at lower concentration followed by corn and then tapioca starches. Texture
profile analysis results showed that potato starch gel was harder, sticky, gummy and chewy than that of corn and tapioca starch gels. The
moisture sorption isotherm described with the help of GAB equation revealed that potato starch had higher heat sorption and monolayer
moisture content compared to corn and tapioca starches.
q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Starch; Gelatinization temperature; Functional properties; Morphology; Pasting characteristics; Sorption isotherm
a deeper insight into the functional properties of native equivalent was determined by the method of Sowbhagya
starches with respect to their morphology and compositional and Bhattacharya (1979).
profile under different processing conditions.
2.5. Functional properties
where dw, density of water at specific temperature; tw, flow heating and cooling cycle was used at constant shear rate
time of certain volume of water at the same temperature; (160 rpm), where the sample was equilibrated at 50 8C for
and hw, viscosity of water. 1 min and then heated to 95 8C at a rate of 12.16 8C/min and
held for 2.5 min. It was again cooled to 50 8C at the same
2.5.4. Flow properties rate and hold for 2 min. A plot of paste viscosity in
The flow properties, viz. consistency coefficient (K) and centipoise (cP) versus time was used to determine peak
flow behaviour index (n) were worked out from the flow viscosity (PV), pasting temperature, final viscosity (FV),
curve of shear rate (r) versus shear stress (t) using the power breakdown viscosity (BKDZPVKtrough) and setback
law equation viscosity (SBZFVKtrough).
The GAB equation is expressed as content (g H2O/100 g dry solids); K is the constant related to
multi-layer molecule properties; C is Guggenheim constant
CkMo aw related to the heat of sorption for the first layer; and aw is the
MZ ;
ð1 K kaw Þð1 K kaw C Ckaw Þ water activity at 20 8C.
Data represent meanGSE of three determinations. The mean values bearing different superscripts in each row differ significantly (P!0.05); NS, non-
significant.
562 S. Mishra, T. Rai / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 557–566
1.7
1.6
1.5
Viscosity (cP)
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Concentration (%,w/v)
2.5
2
Viscosity (cP)
1.5
0.5
0
20 30 40 50 60
Temperature (˚C)
Fig. 3. Viscosity of corn, potato and tapioca starches as a function of concentration (at 30 8C) and temperature (at 0.5%, w/v).
either higher temperature or to acidic condition of the temperature than cereal starches (Waldt & Kehoe, 1959).
starch. The shear stability index (SSI), however, was The peak viscosity was maximum for potato starch
observed to be higher for potato starch. The reduction of (4927.0 cP) than the other starches in spite of the fact that
the viscosity stability of starches might have occurred as a it also showed higher values for breakdown viscosity
result of the destruction of the intra-granular hydrogen (Table 4). This behaviour could be attributed to the fact that
bonds, which maintain the integrity of the granule during
gelatinization (Kearsley & Sicard, 1989).
Table 4 are formed both within and between the swollen starch
Pasting properties of corn, potato and tapioca starches granules and their fragments. The study of the minimum
Pasting properties Starch source concentration required to form gel (Table 3) showed that
Corn Potato Tapioca potato starch gelled at lower (4.0%, w/v) concentration and
Peak viscosity (PV, cP) 2609.00 4927.00 1769.00 was followed by corn (6.0%, w/v) and tapioca (8.0%, w/v)
Gelatinization temperature (8C) 78.25 67.15 66.20 starches. The observation can be explained in terms that it is
Final viscosity (FV, cP) 2530.00 2227.00 2451.00 the linear fraction that readily set up into a solid gel and
Breakdown (BKD, cP) 818.00 3112.00 177.00 since the amylose content was observed to be higher in corn
Setback (SB, cP) 739.00 412.00 859.00
and potato starches, these form gel at lower concentration in
Values are mean of duplicate determinations. comparison to tapioca starch. Thus, differences in the
amylose–amylopectin ratio could be responsible for LCG as
potato starch became swollen very rapidly above the it is the amylose that readily forms gel due to the fact that
gelatinization temperature and the bonding forces within straight chains can orient themselves in a parallel alignment
the granules were of similar strength that breakdown over a so that a large number of hydroxyl groups along the chain
small temperature range (Collison, 1968). Further, the are in close proximity to those on adjacent chains resulting
maximum viscosity was attained when the granules were in in gelation while the alignment is inhibited in case of
their most swollen state, yet still intact resulting in peak amylopectin due to its branched structure (Savarin, 1969).
viscosity. Continued heating of paste at this point, however, However, the observation was not in agreement with the
caused the granule to rupture and accompanied by the fall in report of Waldt and Kehoe (1959) according to whom tuber/
viscosity (Kearsley & Sicard, 1989). The secondary increase root starches gelled much less readily than cereal starches.
in viscosity (setback) during the cooling phase which is Texture Profile Analysis (TPA). TPA stimulates the
associated with the retrogradation phenomenon and related human chewing action by subjecting a sample to a
to amylose content was observed to be minimum for potato compressive deformation (first bite) followed by a relax-
starch (412.0 cP) unlike corn and tapioca starches. This ation and a second deformation (second bite). The
retrogradation or setback was claimed to be influenced by instrument recorded force over time and from the resulting
the various factors, viz. amylose content, length of amylose stress strain curve, several parameters were obtained.
molecules and the state of dispersion of the amylose chains Table 5 revealed that in general potato starch yielded gel
(Savarin, 1969). Thus, although the amylose content was that showed higher cohesiveness, gumminess and chewi-
higher in potato starch, the higher degree of polymerization
ness. This could be due to the higher DP of amylose fraction
(DP) of its amylose molecules might be responsible for
that caused relatively weak gel tendencies with texture
lower setback. Further, the final viscosity was observed to
towards gummy and cohesive side (Waldt & Kehoe, 1959).
be higher for corn starch (2530.0 cP).
However, unlike the earlier report (Collison, 1968) that
The differences among the pasting characteristics of the
cereal starches gave stronger gels, in the present study,
starches arose obviously due to the variation in the starch
potato starch formed firm gel comparable to that of corn
source. It is claimed that, the process of gel formation and
starch. But, Whittenberger and Nutting (1948) reported that
setback depends on polymer association especially of the
the gel strength is correlated with the extent of granule
linear amylose fraction present in the starch molecule
swelling which might have implicated with the present
(Waldt & Kehoe, 1959).
observation. The gel obtained from corn starch was brittle,
stronger and adhesive and showed higher springiness.
3.3.7. Gelation Tapioca starch gel, on the other hand, was softer, less
Least concentration gelation (LCG). When a cooked springy, gummy and chewy. The variation among the
paste of starch cools without agitation intermolecular bonds texture of gels obtained from these starches could be due to
Table 5
Texture profile analysis results of corn, potato and tapioca starches
Data represent meanGSE of three independent determinations. The mean values bearing different superscripts in each row differ significantly (P!0.05);
NS, non-significant.
S. Mishra, T. Rai / Food Hydrocolloids 20 (2006) 557–566 565
4. Conclusion
Kerr, R. W. (1950). Chemistry and industry of starch. New York: Academic Schoch, T. J., & Maywald, E. C. (1956). Microscopic examination of
Press (pp. 659–690). modified starches. Analytical Chemistry, 28(3), 382–387.
Kim, S. Y., Wiesenborn, D. P., Orr, P. H., & Grant, L. A. (1995). Screening Singh, J., & Singh, N. (2001). Studies on the morphological, thermal and
potato starch for novel properties using differential scanning calori- rheological properties of starch separated from some Indian potato
metry. Journal of Food Science, 60, 1060–1065. cultivars. Food Chemistry, 75, 67–77.
Lai, H. M. (2001). Effects of hydrothermal treatment on the physico- Smith, R. J., & Caruso, J. L. (1964). Determination of phosphorus. In R. L.
chemical properties of pregelatinized rice flour. Food Chemistry, 72, Whistler, R. J. Smith, J. N. BeMiller, & M. L. Wolfrom (Vol. Eds.),
455–463. Methods in carbohydrate chemistry: Vol. 4 (pp. 42–46). New York:
Luallen, T. E. (2002). A comprehensive review of commercial starches and Academic Press.
their potential in foods. In A. L. Branen, P. M. Davidson, S. Salminen, Sowbhagya, C. M., & Bhattacharya, K. R. (1979). Simplified determination
& J. H. Torngate (Eds.), Food additives (pp. 757–807). New York: of amylose in milled rice. Starch, 31(5S), 159–163.
Marcel Dekker. Svegmark, K., & Hermansson, A. M. (1993). Microstructure and
Moss, G. E. (1976). The microscopy of starch. In J. A. Radley (Ed.), rheological properties of composites of potato starch granules and
Examination and analysis of starch and starch products (pp. 1–31). amylose: A comparison of observed and predicted structure. Food
London: Applied Science Publishers. Structure, 12, 181–193.
Perry, N. A., & Doan, F. J. (1950). A picric acid method for the Waldt, L. M., & Kehoe, D. (1959). Starch chemistry for the food
simultaneous determination of lactose and sucrose in dairy products. technologist. Food Technology, 5, 1–3.
Journal of Dairy Science, 33, 176–185. Whittenberger, R. T., & Nutting, G. C. (1948). Potato starch gels. Indian
Rao, K. J. (1993). Application of hurdle technology in the development of Engineering Chemistry, 40, 1407.
long life paneer based convenience food. PhD Thesis, National Dairy Wiesenborn, D. P., Orr, P. H., Casper, H. H., & Tacke, B. K. (1994). Potato
Research Institute (Deemed University), Karnal, India. starch paste behaviour as related to some physical/chemical properties.
Rapaille, A., & Vanhemelrijck, J. (1992). Modified starches. In A. Imeson Journal of Food Science, 59, 644–648.
(Ed.), Thickening and gelling agents for food (pp. 171–201). London: Wotton, M., & Bamunuarachchi, A. (1978). Water binding capacity
Blackie. of commercial produced native and modified starches. Starch, 33,
Roller, S. (1996). Starch-derived fat mimetics: Maltodextrins. In S. Roller, 159–161.
& S. A. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of fat replacers (pp. 99–118). Boca Zobel, H. F. (1984). Gelatinization of starch and mechanical properties of
Raton: CRC Press. starch pastes. In R. L. Whistler, J. N. BeMiller, & E. F. Paschall (Eds.),
Savarin, B. (1969). Starches. In M. Glicksman (Ed.), Gum technology in Starch: Chemistry and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 285–309). London:
food industry (pp. 274–329). New York: Academic Press. Academic Press.