Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Joshua J. Santos
University of Arizona
POL 695A: Professional Colloquium
Professor Paulette Kurzer
April 9th, 2023
2
The Master of Arts in International Security Studies from the University of Arizona was
unique in that it allowed you to choose a predetermined path or create your path as you walked
down your academic journey. Most of the classes could be connected in some way, even if it was
not part of the overall learning objectives of the course. For my path, I focused on China's
emergence and the American order's displacement to this rise. I could bring this objective into
The first class I took as part of the Accelerated Master’s Program (AMP) during
undergraduate studies was International Relations of East Asia. This focus was perfect for my
educational interest as it contained much about China, its century of humiliation, and its
determination to become the regional hegemony in Asia while challenging American influence
worldwide. Furthermore, it dove into the current tensions throughout the South China Sea and
the West Philippine Sea regarding the nine-dash line map used by China to exert its influence or
desires in the region. Looking around various news reporting, anyone can see this area becoming
a possible flashpoint as the Philippines pushes back in the Spratly Islands and the United States
tightens its partnership with regional allies. Additionally, China looking to retain a ‘whole’
China means it has Taiwan in its sights. The United States is leaning ever closer to defending
Following this was Professor Beznosov’s Emerging Powers in a Global System course,
where I latched on to the Power Transition Theory and saw it panning out in the system today. In
this class, it gave credit to China, Russia, and India as rising powers. However, this was just
before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But China rising as a global power and understanding
how the rise was happening and the possible outcomes of this rise fit the academic path I wanted
3
to follow. Additionally, during this class, I listened to a lecture from Professor Beznosov about
the different indexes and political theories that showed the placement of a nation in the world
order, whether that was as a rising power or a regional power that looked to attach itself to a
more considerable power for effective means. These lessons got me thinking that there doesn’t
seem to be one that incorporates technology and innovation alongside the already staples of
military and economic power, among others. One day I hope to dive into this and figure out how
to measure that type of power, as it is crucial to a country’s standing in this century. If I can
provide something new to political theory, it will be due to a lecture from this emerging powers
course.
This power transition theory would remain at the front of my academic journey as I
began the Armed Conflict course where the Russian and Ukrainian war had started, so the course
was very prevalent to what was happening in the world. Again, I decided to use the lessons
learned in this course about armed conflict to take an approach of avoiding it altogether. One of
the results of the power transition theory is not the thought of conflict happening, but instead,
when it will happen. With this, I thought the best approach to armed conflict is to be prepared for
it but avoid it altogether. But is it avoidable? This branched off into some research where I found
out about Thucydides Trap, and that war is avoidable, but it takes much work for both sides,
usually understanding of each other’s ways. Unfortunately, this does not fit the mold of Chinese
and American cultures. Therefore, the best approach to avoiding armed conflict is through a
deterrence policy in the South China Sea and the West Philippine Sea to contain a rising China
A large part of deterrence took place in the Geospatial Intelligence course, where the
maintaining a watchful eye on them in the West Philippine Sea. Techniques include full motion
video and satellite imagery to secure the interest of the partners of the United States in the
region. Some of these techniques could involve sensitive reconnaissance operations (SRO)
threading the line of international law and Chinese “territory” in the Spratly Islands. Think of the
Spratly Islands region as a Hawaii, controlling the area allows for access to open waters in the
Pacific Ocean and the Indian Ocean allowing for a green-water navy to become a blue-water
navy and exert its dominance in other places while maintaining a logistical haven much like the
United States uses Hawaii. Additionally, the region sees one-third of the global shipping trade
and has a vast amount of energy below the waters (ChinaPower CSIS, 2021). Furthermore, the
geospatial techniques allow for deterrence against Chinese aggression in the region by watching
the Chinese Coast Guard and the People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia.
The Spratly Islands region brings me to the course on International Law and
Organizations. The theme in this class was understanding the various international laws and
organizations that help the world move from day to day while keeping a check and balance
system around the world to ensure countries do not overreach. Additionally, another theme of
this course was though these organizations are set up to help maintain order in the world, the
United States is given many decisions that are favorable toward them, but it is somewhat
expected as they invest heavily into these organizations but are also a great power. This
favoritism may be unfair, but the unipolar system of the world since the downfall of the Soviet
Union has seen a very peaceful time in the world pertaining to conflict. But this dominance of
American decisions has also led to nations such as Russia and China growing tired of the status
quo and looking to displace the current world order. And China has reached a point where they
openly challenge this order. Additionally, one thing that the United States must do to maintain
5
this order is to accept decisions made by these international organizations and look to help the
international court's decisions to be followed. An example that fits the path I chose to follow
with this program is the arbitration decision by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea (UNCLOS) Bulletin 91 verifying the Philippines' argument about their ownership in the
Spratly Islands (United Nations, 2017). China has ignored this decision, and they are looking to
take more territory in the West Philippine Sea. In this case, a possible way to back up the court’s
(FONOPs) to check China within the bounds of international law and the determination of the
ruling.
Flashpoints are possible areas where conflict could become a reality. Between China and
the United States, these could be over Taiwan or protecting interests in the Spratly Islands
region. Another region where a flashpoint is slowly emerging is Central Asia, where a New
Great Game is beginning, as discussed in both courses, Politics and Security in Central Asia and
Politics of Energy Security. With Politics and Security in Central Asia, the theme was
predominantly with energy inefficiencies throughout the entire region and widespread
corruption, which has caused a lack of regionalism in the Central Asian region. However, it is
essential to understand that the region has a hybrid style of authoritarian governments. This may
translate to give and take to implement them in any partnership. Following the theme, I had tried
to follow, China has realized this way of dealing with Central Asia, and it has been beneficial to
their standing in the region as they receive much-needed energy, a pass-through for their Belt
and Road Initiative (BRI), and it allows for their sphere of influence.
The Politics of Energy Security course showcased the heavy importance of energy to
nations and the depths to which they will go to protect those interests or use them to demonstrate
6
their power. Additionally, it discussed the ever-changing technologies that make obtaining
energy resources a reality and the new places where energy may be tapped into, such as the
Arctic. Furthermore, energy security is an up-and-down affair in Europe, and one Europe wants
the United States to stay out of. Energy security flashpoints are prevalent in the world, and this
holds in Central Asia, where a great power competition is happening, but also in the Arctic,
where the United States and Russia will heavily protect their interests, and China is looking to
invest in the region to have a hand at being a part of what unfolds. In the past, energy concerns or
energy advancements have aided in the cause of armed conflicts. Examples of this are Japan
attacking the United States in 1941 and between Great Britain and Germany before World War I
The final course I would like to include in this course is Russian Foreign and Security
Policy. My reasoning for doing so is that one of the themes was to look at things objectively or,
at least, understand the other side of an argument, even if it was one you might disagree with.
During this course, I saw that it was difficult for many students to do this as it went against what
they had thought about the Russian government. One of the standing pillars of this course was
the Russian National Idea and their basis for pushing back against the West, as they felt that they
were never accepted. Putting this in my academic path, I took this stance when discussing China
and the United States, as it is hard to figure out the policy of the Chinese toward the rest of the
world. Part of their idea is a historical stance of China being the middle ground between Earth
which is the rest of the world, and the heavens. Again, understanding the impact of the century of
humiliation on current Chinese ideals means that one must look at foreign policy through their
lens and understand the basis for pushing back against the American world order.
7
Growth
My growth during this academic journey in the Master of Arts in International Security
Studies at the University of Arizona has been expansive. I have grown to look at things from
both angles in a dispute or policy to understand its reasoning. Additionally, it has given me a
better understanding of world politics through security, which has many different layers.
Furthermore, it has piqued my curiosity to learn outside of the classroom and research deeply
The world is currently undergoing significant changes in the status quo of world order
which could result in armed conflict. I believe that much of the world does not truly understand
how close the world is to a significant conflict. However, it is avoidable, just as Graham Allison
discusses with the Thucydides Trap. Tools received from this program at the University of
Arizona will be vital to my future research and career path. Especially if the intent is to avoid a
conflict with an adversary that is not fully understood through their culture or foreign policy
when much of the discussion internally is masked from the world of intent.
International Securities are essential to avoid conflict, but they are also crucial in helping
policymakers win conflicts. Important to the world are the researchers, advisors, and academic
professors on giving individuals the tools to succeed in ushering in the new age of security
concepts to the world, and the University of Arizona has demonstrated that they are at the upper
echelons of displaying these teachings. A great power competition is upon us, and we will be
vital in avoiding conflict, if possible, or guiding the world leaders into successes and resolutions.
My growth in the securities arena has been nurtured and blossomed due to the University of
Arizona, where the professors have maintained a high level of education that will be used in real-
life decisions.
8
References
Allison, G., 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap?. New
ChinaPower Project. (2021, January 25). How much trade transits the South China Sea?
china-sea/
United Nations. 2017. Bulletin No. 91: Law of the Sea. Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law
of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs. New York, NY. Pp. 28-38.