Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exchange Rates
Are foreign exchange markets efficient? The $/€ exchange rate from 1975 to
2022
e% P
If all goods were subject to perfect arbitrage then the real exchange rate would always be
equal to 1. This theory implies that the nominal exchange rate will be simply the ratio of the
prices in the two countries:
&
" %
! ! = !1! ! =
%
[Let’s check: iPhone, Big Mac, haircuts]
Theory #2: Law of one price does not hold. Two reasons:
1. Prices of tradables are roughly the same around the world because of
arbitrage (think of an iPhone).
2. Within a country, prices of traded goods (iPhone) and non-traded
goods (haircuts) are linked through their relative productivity.
3. The real exchange rate will depend on the relative productivity of the
two countries.
4. The nominal exchange rate will depend on the real exchange rate and
monetary policy (i.e. inflation).
Example: two countries differ on their GDP per capita because of their productivity on
the trade sector (realistic assumption).
Number of hours Spain Germany
required to (low GDP per Capita) (high GDP per Capita)
Spain Germany
Produce a car 2000 1000
Produce/Serve a Big Mac 0.2 0.2
Price of a car is the same in both countries because of arbitrage: 20,000 Euros
Real exchange rate is below one Price level is lower in Spain than in Germany.
%
" ! &
! = '
&
Because Spain and Germany share a currency, this can happen only through
a high inflation in Spain (eN=1). But this is not macroeconomic inflation, this
is “good” inflation.
Change countries: China (low GDP per capita) versus the US (high GDP per
capita). Real exchange rate lower than one as well (China’s price level lower
than the US).
Imagine a scenario where productivity in China increases relative to the US
due to convergence (Session 4).
Wages and therefore prices of non-tradables in China will increase and the
real exchange rate will appreciate.
%
" ! &
! = '
&
But now there is a nominal exchange rate so there are two options: higher
inflation in China or nominal appreciation (or a combination of both).
Who decides which one will happen? Central Bank
Can we see a nominal depreciation: yes if inflation is too high
Fixed exchange rates means a commitment by central bank to buy and sell unlimited
amounts of its currency at a “fixed” price.
For example:
• Increase liquidity, lower interest rate à capital outflow and pressure to depreciate
• Need to buy back local currency at fixed price à reduce liquidity, higher interest rate
• [back to where we started]
1.2
United States
1 United Kingdom Netherlands
Price Level Relative to US
Germany
0.8 France
Korea
China
Czech Republic
0.6
South Africa Mexico
Namibia Bulgaria
Poland
Russia
0.4 Thailand Serbia
Pakistan Turkey
Ukraine Paraguay
Indonesia
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
GDP per Capita Relative to US (PPP)
Percentage 10
change
9
in nominal
exchange 8 South Africa
rate 7
6 Depreciation
5 Italy relative to
U.S. dollar
4 New Zealand
Australia Spain
3 Sweden
Ireland
2 Canada
1 France UK
Belgium
0
-1 Appreciation
Germany Netherlands
-2 relative to
Switzerland U.S. dollar
-3 Japan
-4
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Source: Mankiw (Fig.5.13). Averages for 1972-2000.
Inflation differential
Macroeconomics in the Global Economy
Exchange Rates for Countries with Different
Productivity Growth
Productivity growth in Japan in the period 1976-1996 outpaced that of the U.S. This led to
an increase in the price level in Japan relative to the U.S. This is what we call a real exchange
rate appreciation.
290
240
190
140
90
1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000
1.9 0.8
1.7 0.75
0.7
1.5
0.65
1.3
0.6
1.1
0.55
0.9
0.5
0.7
0.45
0.5 0.4
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Theory #2: Law of one price does not hold. Two reasons:
Theory #3: Currencies are assets and exchange rates represent their
prices. Let’s use asset pricing to think about exchange rates.
Stylized Fact #2: Volume on foreign exchange markets is very large (i.e. capital
flows dominate foreign exchange markets).
8000
7000
6000
Billions USD
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022
v A sudden increase in interest rates in one country will lead to a capital inflow and
an appreciation of the currency. News on interest rates determine change in
exchange rates.
v But be careful: the above theory does not say that countries with higher interest
rates should have appreciating currencies. Quite the contrary: arbitrage ensures that
returns are equalized across currencies and countries with higher interest rates
have depreciating currencies.
v It is only the news on changes in monetary policy that makes exchange rates
move up when interest rates go up.
Money
Nominal Exchange Rate
1. In the long run the exchange
depreciates by an amount equal to the
Time 0 increase in the price level (PPP)
Time
Interest rates
Time 0 Time 0
Time
Time
Prices
3. On impact, the nominal exchange 2. During the period where
rate depreciates. It does so up to the interest rates are lower (and
point where the future appreciation there are no news) the exchange
Time 0 Time matches the difference in interest rates rate appreciates to ensure that
and leads towards the new PPP long- there are no excess returns
run value. There is a unique value (“arbitrage” in capital markets).
today that satisfies these two The appreciation happens at a
conditions. Intuitively, the exchange rate which is equal to the
rate depreciations because lower difference in interest rates.
interest rates trigger a capital outflow
(the IS-LM model).
Macroeconomics in the Global Economy
2017. Euro
Are Foreign Exchange Markets Efficient? strengthens on
surprising growth
USD per EUR Exchange Rate (recovery from
1.75 two recessions)
1980. US Federal Reserve What is the “right” value? PPP? (OECD Estimate)
raises interest rates to stop
1.55
inflation while new
president (Reagan) engages
1.35 in large budget deficits
1.15
0.95
March 2015.
Goldman Sachs
0.75 1999. Euro is born at 1.17 $. predicts Euro will
Market pessimism follows hit parity in 6
months
0.55
Jan-75 May-78 Sep-81 Jan-85 May-88 Sep-91 Jan-95 May-98 Sep-01 Jan-05 May-08 Sep-11 Jan-15 May-18 Sep-21
In the past, Central Banks have intervened when the currency moved “too far” from its fundamental
value as it happened in September 1985 (Plaza Accord), February 1987 (Louvre Accord) and the
interventions of November 2000 to stop the fall in the Euro.
Nov 10th Nov 13th Nov 14th Nov 15th Nov 16th Nov 17th Nov 29th
1.278 1.285 1.285 1.282 1.281 1.282 1.315
What works:
1. Long term trend shows depreciating USD (because of higher inflation).
2. Some episodes of fast US growth and high interest rates (the early 80’s
led to an appreciating USD.
What cannot be explained:
1. The exchange rate is too volatile.
2. The link between interest rates and exchange rates is too weak. The spot
rate is a better prediction than the interest rate differential.
3. Some short-term trends cannot be explained by any consistent economic
theory.
4. There are too many episodes where the exchange rate appreciates (or
depreciates) continuously over a long period of time. This is only possible
if there is a continuous flow of news about monetary policy that always
go in the same direction (very unlikely).
Macroeconomics in the Global Economy
Summary: What Do We Know about Exchange Rates?
1. In the long run, exchange rates are determined by arbitrage of tradable goods. There is a long-
run equilibrium value of the nominal exchange rate implied by arbitrage and the actual nominal
exchange rate fluctuates around it.
2. In the long run, we can describe movements in nominal exchange rates as reflecting differences
in inflation rates (adjusted for productivity changes).
3. In the short run, we think of exchange rates as asset prices. Interest rate determine the evolution
of nominal exchange rates in the short run. An unexpected increase in the interest rate, leads to
immediate appreciation of the currency. Once the interest rate has gone up, higher interest rates
predict depreciation of the currency. The reason is arbitrage. Make the distinction between an
“increase in interest rates” vs. “higher interest rates”.
4. Empirically, nominal exchange rates are much more volatile than any of the macroeconomic
fundamentals and even the ‘overshooting’ result cannot explain why exchange rates are so
volatile.
5. Be aware that the ‘theories’ that explain exchange rate movements are much more ex-post
rationalization than tested hypothesis. Only way to anticipate changes in the exchange rate is if
you are good at guessing what the theory of the day will be.