Jounal ofthe Korean Society of Civil Engineers ISSN 1015-6348 (Print) Vol. 33, No.3: 965~974, May 2013 ISSN 2287-934X (Online) DOK: rtp: /axdolorg/10.12652/Ksce2013.33:.965 ‘wwwkscejournalor ke Moga FLO-20 SYS O1St SPA EMS RS FADO] weet. weer. eae ‘Seungeun Kim", Joongcheol Paik**, Kyung Suk Kim"** Run-out Modeling of Debris Flows in Mt. Umyeon using FLO-2D ABSTRACT Multiple debris flows occurred on July 27, 2012 in Mt. Umyeon, which resulted in 16 casualties and severe property demage. Accurate reproducing ofthe propagation and deposition of debris flow is essential for mitigating these disasters. Through applying FLO-2D ‘model to these debris flows and comparing the results with field observations, we seek to evaluate the performance ofthe model and toanalyse the theological model parameters, Representative yield stress and dynamic viscosity back-calculated for the debris lows in the northern side of Mt. Umyeon are 1022 Pa and 652 Pa's, respectively, Numerical results obtained using these parameters reveal that deposition areas of debris flows in Raemian and Shindong-A regions are well reproduced in 63 ~ 85% agreement with the field ‘observations. However, the propagation velocities of the flows are significantly underestimated, which is attributable to the inherent limitations of the model that can't take the entrainment of bed material and surface water into account. The debris flow deposition ‘computed in Hyeongchon region where the entrainment is not significant appears to be in very good agreement with the field ‘observation. The sensitivity study of the numerical results on model parameters shows that both sediment volume concentration and roughness coefficient significantly affect the flow thickness and velocity, which underscores the importance of careful selection ofthese ‘model parameters in FLO-20 modeling, Key words : Debris flow, Numerical Modeling, FLO-2D, Deposition, Mt. Umyeon 2011x172) 2791 4-2) OHO alelo] seats WeAaTO) he DBS AE was Ob aE. Let EA STORE aeheH1 sada AWPLVA o) eat 14) hd sa FAW ee 4h ashe ole 4 el ab] FLOID FALMER ASAIO}, LIS ASS VBL, ol S LALsiSteh 9d oA Waa ALL QU ALS} FLO-DD 529) 4 BAS BONA OLE FUL ALS] AE PH-BES 1,022 Pa “Leh A BAIS 652 Pars el lee pcb Sach el AMER OL Bsbo] FI EAS] MAUS API aH, ele HAM) 29-63-85 Bea] sede AaeLS LA) FLO2D WS alah} A194 #1 gE As UeTSACE Shee, FLO-ID Ao] AIA FF] AIMPHGL SLeHRE = RE aL a A chee IONFBO} MAIL Ae gE AIFOF-H AY EATS] Hakdets aA teks alee UebK HebEA Aol Ie dB) BUSH] Be Ves HF ATS FES Ap OP TMS aS FF ase welsishch ee BA ob Abas SRA I HOT RG WL IS aD ASB PRO UL, o} who] ABA TS ACE AE Ol aa MOI: 52419, 31521, FLO-ID, 4, Fett + GRATES EHE|zh (svervigow@houmall.com) s+ gale anal}. 25917 U10bs 8-3-2} (Comesponding Author-Gangneung Wonju National University pak. kt) sor gL SSSA, Fea GA (kskimDkd@ex coke) Received December 28 2012, Revised February 21 2013, Accepted March 16 2013 Copyright © 2013 bythe Korean Society of Civil Enginzers | Tistan Open Accs ais sted under the tens of he Crane Commons Atibu Nor Came License (heperatneconmansarecenssty-ne3.0) | ‘hich permis nested non-omercil ws, istibtn, an eedaction nny medium, povided teria work sop itFLOAD BBS 188 FAME RA AE Fal] LAE EARS PeLUaIS] BF AREESSF AE FO] ARIAT eke iebashes| FS PEROT ofall wevetch 20000} HOV OFM. ME SAPO} soy Oe els 12] 2 2006 ASEPS lel Fee} SHAN] We waht wsiste PYAPAA 2008), 201A 7H AEA] ASF ATE AT aels] $4le] Ro B4) ches Waa EARS wee Dae ALS] 2a OP REE SHE BEATE aT eS 2011), GRR] We EA} oladolss BAAS] Eo MASSA BIBL PARE RATE ATO 7A HIS Beige Ae. 0] Ao] AE SALA] weshate PL o1S ela we elesh ab walt waves) whazoleh. Fe]UeHS SF} wo etsiel| alge alely7t Wal wer AHO I Sol <1 EF Wo] Aso] glebat we + slek OleIGE RAISES UGE spas AILS] SHSM EAE oleh ALNMOEE osha, WERE EAH o}RtA o}ahar slats 0] SHRROVA] ales: HENS ORE 4 B= 7KerIeLe] 18ST ole eh 6] SHV He EAS] HES MAT VE FL S APIS. 7PE Ve] AHESISL Dis FLO FAILS He 4 EAFiel) 48}6} o) ale) VES -A7}elav} eh FLO- a SPH OC) RAICL Gi Welehs 22h 2 FWA Gite different mode) 2A = 35, VAL See, SABES) SFT ee woh pet 3G oo) we Sse] A EAS STR BL ob] us, oldie), A914, UKE eeHE ole a7 FLO.2Ds #182}StC} (Julien and O'Brien, 1997; Bertolo and Wieczorek, 2005; Lin et al, 2005; Mikos et al., 2006; Cetina etal, 2006, Hsu et Luma, et al. 2011), © 2004 HE WHEeH(Mindulleys. @192 Uigl Song-Her 21¢4H AL WIRE EANTE wolaiglonl, SHS Sah awe Sb oberevt eats, aol S14] Bove 7TH, TRESIEE Mikos MUO] Kose AI] FEE VE FLO-2D9} DEBRIF-IDS AEs}o] Aeeha1, abalshaleh ahaleh Ge. elie eel] Fl 2718 $9191) 28's, 286m'se]s4, A1Fo} owHEs= LEMsow F asigic gt HL As OE alate] BalsgIgots mize e HIS SIE + s1SICK SA, 2011), 191) who gy} USVI NLS, HAE BPH A) $8BGE RYE LAH ggLzAE 211) BSAC o] FOS eR 4 He] 107ke) AF *2tsIo} % ASH we af ME OLS EAE 1071 BBY] 4 wbyaRe OF 3,800m TEMA EHEI, 2011), 0} AIofols AFF Wa Bale] ee] ASH ey} Woes, FS] TABS oF 580me] x4}, aliol Oe} Cea eebalo & 2479} FARR] Aleks 150m 3000023 fo} FO} My colehFig. 3. Regions for FLO-20 simulation(wihite lines in each region denote inflow sections) (left, Raemian; center, Shindongea; right, Hyeongchon) Table 2. Computational conditions Inflow el | a a Sediment a size Concentration kK ° Inflow time Manning's» | 0.02~006 Simulation Racrian 0. 3605 4, 234g Tee, Ao} wat ents ap Aedes FBP algaiaton), + debi Fae Kae F 13 7Ae} fH} oe ADSAM HYAMS chepa sle]ch 79 S| WHEL ASTON RL HE DAR Ae MMe AEE 7] wie o]eH] B18 gt eS) SRST ALR} IE AS] LSE a STH AAAS Se Aheich Aol AMES] aches Belsha Table 22} #2}, 1g}. ZH alte Fh 4g. ea} 20] 4.1 DEM xs}o] A+8%t DEME Fare BAD A) Boe Ln 10ms} SH} 7HLER 1A] DEM wiolete o}884stch 2] ANGLE, 1 BE VOI 2 OHNE Hole SMS she wale ake. 41218) sels) oy wevSIgLOM WE slo] , eoIeh Foto] F- 7] MPBOA & sla sto] oF louie Seiden Veebs 4) Azel Shal 514 AI] lula: SIS Bee F¥sI°} 38000n! 28 AMRIT Bembs Baas] AN 107A APs] aE sek aia Table 3, Inflow rate and the number of elements in each pplication area, “Ste | Raerian | Stindong"A | Hyeonaston roars Tan | son | soo iatrvcaiay | 30 | | Inflow rate (m/s) 2951 41.20 | 74.97~ 130.16 970 Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers ‘3 SAHPRO] Glo) Wegsise=s) obtel Aep shan waa oh 4 Siok Shah SE wPab-Pgo] Sal 4 ua ask. 12m, Sao APPR Waste lal ASS ea 7Pe¥0] ee. BE AeleheL Sv Wasa) Makeiehe “app FA) QAR AOS eI, 0] GOT 4A] AoA Ape Bap} Sao PSHE PISO, 10 FIONA PBR BAH] BAGO) obs 474 APO 2H} SV WHE ULB we} vial Sle) MMU Aloe AAG Seabee SF alow) AAG Fig 29D] sho HAS A Col DOPE algo. o, Hales HARE Re Ped Agee] ape EPH AeTCh 8) HRS) HAE Aaa] $s VE Hol woh 22}, 2, 3, SHIM) HARA Bele 2} #9} APES ASIGSRE: 106-44m'ss, 74.975, 84.66m'/s, 130.16m")s C1Ek 2 HIN NHI HLS: Ge Fig, 495 eh = Discharge (ema Orme 008 OBO 002 Gos 006 age 0x0 010 a0 Times Dichege (mat aa 8 02 time im 6 os Fig 4. Inflow hydrograph for each application area: , Raemian;b, Shindong-a;¢ Hyeongchon)5. Bib BA FLO-2D 2S] Se ela] SA ABE BUslo) He ee) 7st, vise) AR AG shared eed eer} ada 2 SM PRE BSA) elolebsh GSH Ht a] USI. HM Chae CIR ORNS hee] ost = Spaga}slony, AMINE Wh aS ahs} whstshe} ® AVEO} $2101 WANE 4} Wiha OhYeHsICE Table 19] el=I6} 3h 3 BATS) BS ABEle} wo} £23} Glenwood! 29] ee}Q33} BME Ve GOES welsh] et de absyelehe o] Hl WYRE EASES] Al AAS 7 ARE wel 2H UE SHIGE + Mek S, HRAE eA}el eloleh gt kgo} #21014 WBE EzTFiol cho] ekabet oe saa a4 Hae ee $24 Wh, Aspen 9} IO} Re} SHPO] Fig, 5. Time evolution of debris flow thickness computed using ‘Aspen watershed conditions in Raemian region Fig 6. Time evolution of debris flow thickness computed using ‘Aspen watershed conditions in Shindong-a region (= 1022Pa 12422 weep oS opr SH PMfow thidaes AYA nts 652 Past AQEIRICE olg-sle} ALi ARE 12} 79) 2} ae 0) ae ‘ysyech DRO ZF He}0NA 7 Ee Spe SEIS] See Fihyperconeentrated flow) Ee By Be EN) OK] AIS HE Se Fig. 49] Ups} Zo], 59] Aspe] YER T ebpeo}o] Bs} AA Bolo] OV} Sie Ble RBRUAAS] ay NE 55> DEM 219] 23} B+ Ch 0] BS AISI HAS avlek fee] wale aaa) gee wae Fee BE, ox UebieM, meh SSE WB S}3) Ao} lal esos laze el epotels] AG 85% what AVE} HAS] BP oF OA BS Doe wr VebICk 26] BARE AS Oe} Feb es 1 Abyeb7) WE Ase] Tee APIS BS] BE Fig. 7. Comparison of computed and measured deposition areas ‘of debris flows in [lft] Raemian and (right Shindong-2 regions Vol33. No3 May 2013 971FLO-2D SYS o1Gtt PAT EAE HF HA}29) 12 3 PAIS B SIC AVAL FLO-2D "Rl0] ae] ‘Bevkge al whael ls) 2h SS Aalele] HBS PANES AaloH wlalebe) Sa e 7 = AAS Hato] ee =y5] Aa 4 71 ASHI QA 7HERE wis} Bo] ex AS S WHE LAS] ZF HO} Abel SABHS Fh BARS] fe OS WE GA) RS AsO} SRIATEL BIZ] OES Fao] rah ash UPAR 2] whos WEHEIE 2eE Iverson et al(2011}9] TA SO] we aha APA) BATE Hoth HAST Bao] Sea BOS HM Ge Ine wegen, ob 3 Shek ol ut FLO.2D BBE AA) Seb} So] WHE ala GB S7Ash ol] iE ES Sh aS et AE HRS] VRS DO + 971 ot Lacie ares] ale <> alts bale] SICk ebereE “tO 7 ] ate vlok= $H ose YebI| 1] USF A 21st AP. Ae OPN OFS} fale] HES = lo. Uebaoh leigh ARMSHS Fig. 105] EE ee RbRE Aleck Bars Hele pals] BS #4232{main channel)7} SR hel SONS Ass BHA] Alo] gles BS AR 2] Abe Be ekch 4] VALWel Slah ARI EAS] Mate Vang] van van) Scam ee ee Be AS A Fig. 8. Computed debris flow propagation in Hyeongchon vilage region Fig. 10. Deposition materials captured in Hyeongchon village Fig. 8. Deposition thickness of debs flow computedin Hyeongchon region just after debris flow event: [upper] locaton (1 village region and [lower] location in Figures 972 Jounal of the Korean Society of Civil EngineersFig. 1. Deposition zone of debris flow, computed using different sediment volume concentration in Raemian region & MO} + WE FLOW Ve] BY- o}e]e EG] HES A ARIE + 9171 sHzOICh 3 FLOID wae SHALE] ee S| BS AHS] SHS WES MA + ES Hel] saa) delayed pale} aol] et Fateh: UUIOR. AK FF eM} 7H a SLE etPIgt ofa AO SEAR Fioh HA] pA} Tat AY SNATS 9) Mannings nate) waPt vals Ba a wes wa abhe Aleban EL Wha] 46M] 54%6 WIRIS] HAFAFAR whe 1EAIF] ol8 M4) S98 WASH Fig 112 AP EAF SSO oS EAGT] 514] WSS Bele Woe, Se7t S7RHS S14) fete] HA] EAMG: SI + Ch ofA FLOID AION] fxr So we} I Ses} 4a] Clea, ASP] abe ork SOL IPRSS} EAE) SHON} oVGEHEA| ‘BS ANEEIIeheh AHP] e AUaOVA] EAS] Blo) BHF] 9} PEASE Fig. 129] MaLsIsHeh V+] + SLs) FAAS SIS EA) 2) BE FAPE STS Weed, HRT AAG H+ leh Hole Rot EAN AR FAPTEPSIESE °F 8% SHV BF ASPEN] A FSM ABIL SEAS OF LBM ASHE Ale Yeh SICH Manning's nigh 718 349) €1¥(Luna et al, 2011; Li etal. 2011)9 % AVA AEA dla] else og 0.062. SMI FAS OF 66% Heeb 1.5 @7}ohs Ao Ueheh web 5% rhe 9) RE FMOF H WIO TSE AHS AML ols UE ol $40] BEA Bet cl UtepH VigsHe lox He mEh wal i A i, ct i ne i zg ae i i 3 i a Mannings Fig. 12, Sensitivity of debris flow thickness and propagation velocity on [upper] sediment volume concentration and ower] Manning's n 6.22 20114! 7H 2781 Hel Waa! elo] EAH SoA BS Ae evlebh AES} OEE Re] EA OH Oley AME Mo| FLODD VAIS 4gsio] TASS V7} SH BHPIR Y Wer} abso S7sle] os AT sFaH) URE SHE OVERS APESILOM, o1S OIE oLBSIO} BEL Holo WHT EA] agslo] eslsieh o] ht oP) ok) AES delete chsh ech atelelst Abst 9} AH] lel] FLO-2D 44) she $adSIo| FA IPSS OHNE a 2011 7a Mee pa AL EAMES] AP BLSELE 1,000~1,200Pa, BAIS 400~ T0OPa-sel Aes Lech Ae wVAI4S o}8-se] o| EAFio] MAGS AIL Tat alah Hake] Ag- 85% Behe 2 Wwht AS} HAS 63%9] AER wisIohS ZO EBL UE Bie) VASE otshe Ale] Fekete aeloyeh 2 PARP ISH BOR HERE OLB DEM 2HE9) OAH $5 71K A] HASH wha FLOD7} 3410 at AES HOD + GSS Desh, ATT STRAY Aas set steel (ae) Ao: H88H BSR + as Few ete Vol33 No3 May 2013 973,FLO2D BRL oP SAA SAH HE Salw9] HOI Ao] I Aa} Go] Mle] he ers POO] BRE EAS FLO Wo] s}aH} Lo} APA) ABP PSLOMATS] ahs Aba) SMS laa a SRE Aoi wold oe Ue Ue} FLO2D Bae ANE Ad] eo) =) Ve EAE HER MAS Melee geet # UE Boe Yep ARE OHS Hg @ alee ws] Cea, HABE SOF 8% SPI HPA HE IMR Aashat BHF 7S &F 1.80 S71SKS BA, Manning’s nee 0.04077} 0206.2. SSP AAS 2 66k BASEL SEPA OF 1 Sh Sri 2s Hebe oe} obi LF BAS) SSN} Hy SFO] TIE TRS vlads, Heh) BA ux} v] Wasp Wgsh= alos Yep. 2A a 0] Sess SEMIS Ae Teelaigel eel daabahe EH OATS BOL, FBP DEAE WA MAD jah apsyalgeeh References Bagnold, R. A. (1954). “Experiments ona gravity-fee dispersion of | large solid spheres in a Newtonian Muid under shear." Proc. ofthe Royal Soe. of London, 25, pp. 49-63. Benolo P. and Wieczorek, G. 2005). "Calibration of numerical ‘models for small debris flows in Yosemite Valley, California, USA.” Natural Hazard and Earth System Sciences, 5, pp. 993-1001 Cetina, M., Rajar, R., Hojnik, T, Zakrajsek, M., Krayk, M. and Mikos, M, (2006). “Case study: Numerical Simulations of Debris Flow Below Stoze, Slovenia J. Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 2, pp. 121-130. FLO-2D (2009). FLO-2D: Reference manual, 2009, available a tip: flo-2d com/wp contentsploads/FLO-2D-Reterence- Manusl-2009 pa Hsu, 8. M,, Chiou, L. B, Lin, G.F., Chao, C. H., Wen, H. Y. and Ku, C. ¥. (2010) “Applications of simulation technique on debirs- flow hazard zane delineation: a case study’ in Huslien ‘County, Taiwan." Narrual Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol 10, pp. 535-545, Inerson R. M., Reid, M.E., Logan, M. LaHlusen, R,G., Godt, W. and Griswold, J.P. Q2011), “Positive feedback and momentum ‘grouth during debirs‘low entrainment of wet bed sediment.” Nature Geoscience, Vol. 4, pp. 116-121 Julien, PY. and O'Brien, J. S. (1997), “Selected notes on debris flow dynamics, Recent developments on debris flows.” Lecture 974 Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers note in earth sciences, Springer, Berlin, pp. 14-162. im, KS. 2008), *Charactrsts of basin topography and rainfall triggering debris flow." J. of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 28, Na. 5, pp. 263-271 (in Korean). Korean Geotechnical Society (2011), Final report of investigation ofthe cause and preparation of countermeasures for landslides in. Mr Unyeon, Report No. KGSI1-250, The Seoul Metropol Korean) i, M-HL, Sung, RT, Dong, JJ, Lee, C-T. and Chen, C-C. (2011). "The formation and breaching ofa short-lived landslide dam at Hsiaoln Village, Taiwan ~ Part I: Simulation of Debis Flow with Landslide Dam Breach Engineering Geology, Vol. 123, pp. 60-71 Lin, MoL,, Wang, KL. and Huang, JJ. 2008), “Debris low ‘nol simulation and verifeation ~ cae study of Chen-You-Lan Watershed, Taivan Naru Hecards and Barth Sysen Sciences, Vol. §, pp 439-445 Lin, P-S,, Lee, JH. and Chang, C.. W. 2011). “An application of the FLO-2D model to debisflow simulation ~ A ease of SONG-HER distet in TAIWAN.” Proc. of 5th International Conference on Debrie-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment, p. 947-986 Luna, B. Q,, Blahut, J, van Westen, C. 1, Sterlacchin Asch, T. W. J, Abas, S. 0, 2011, “The application of numerical debris flow modeling forthe generation of physical vulnerability curves” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. Uy pp. 2047-2060. Mikes, M, Fazarine, R, Majes,B, Rajar,.R, Zagar,D, Kreyk, M,, Nojuik, T and Cetin, M. (2006) “Nuria simulation of debris ows triggered from the strug rock fall source area, W Slovenia.” Natural Hazards and Barth System Sciences, Vol-6, pp 261-270. (O’Brien, JS. & Julien, PY, (198). "Laboratory analysis of Mud- flow properties." Journal of Hydraulics Enginering, Vol. U4, No.8 pp. 877-887 Paik, J 2011, “Run-out analysis of debris flows on July 2011 in ‘Mt. Umyeon." Pro: of 37" Annual Conference af Korean Society of Chil Engineers, KINTEX, Goyang-si, Korea (in Korean} Pierson, T. C.& Costa, J E (1987). “A theologe las subaeral sediment.nater flows, in Debris Flows/Avalanches: Process, Recognition, and Mitigation.” Rew: Eng, Geol, Vo. 7, edited by JE, Costa and GF. Wieczorek, Geol. Soc. of Am. Boulder, Colo, pp. 1-2. RD-FLOW (2011), “Characterstis of 2011 Korean Landslide and Debris Flow Disasters, River and Road in Mountain Area” esearch Center fr River Flow Impingement and Debris Flow, Vol. 4, Special Issue, Gangneung, Korea (in Korean), Son, $-H, Choi B. and Paik, J. (2012). “Characteristics of ainfall and groundwater level in ML. Umyeon.” Prac of 38" Annual Conference of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 769-772 (in Korean). Takahashi, T, (2007). Debris flow: Mechanics, Prediction and Countermeasures, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.