Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The surface composition of a quartz surface reacted with various aqueous solutions of pH 0-10 was
qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The positions and
intensities of the recorded Si 2p and O 1s lines change depending on solution conditions. The O 1s line,
where the position varies more significantly, was analyzed in detail showing three components corresponding
to three surface species: >SiOH2+, >SiOH0, and >SiO- (where > represents the bulk quartz). The changes
in the Si 2p spectra support these findings. The atomic ratio between the surface oxygen and silicon atoms
was found to be 1.8. These data allow proposing a two-step deprotonation model of the quartz surface where
two surface oxygen atoms are bonded to one silicon surface atom and where the most deprotonated surface
sites show the SiO- configuration. Physisorbed water in the amount of around 10% of the monolayer was
also found on all samples under spectroscopic investigation. The density of the >SiO- group increases
significantly with an increase of pH, whereas the surface concentration of the >SiOH2+ group is the highest
at pH 0. The maximum of the neutral >SiOH0 group is observed at pH 6. These results indicate immediately
the validity of a 2-pK model of protonation of quartz/electrolyte interface versus a 1-pK model. The 2-pK
surface capacitance model of the electric double layer having pK1 ) - 1.0 and pK2 ) 4.0 was derived from
the XPS data. The new surface stability constants allow a quantitative description of quartz surface charge
and dissolution kinetics in neutral to alkaline solutions and explicitly account for an increase of quartz
dissolution rate at pH < 2 due to significant increase of the concentration of the >SiOH2+ surface species.
These results provide, for the first time, direct atomic level spectroscopic evidence of the validity of the
chemical surface speciation approach, notably the existence of the charged >SiOH2+ and >SiO- species at
the quartz surface and their relative densities in acidic and alkaline solutions.
( )
model compound for testing various physicochemical models
for metal oxide/solution interfaces and mineral surfaces (see, {>MeO-}aH+ -Ψ0F
K2 ) exp
for example, refs 22-25). Many applications of quartz and {>MeOH } 0 2.3RT
* Corresponding author. E-mail: jerzy.mielczarski@ensg.inpl-nancy.fr. where {>i} stands for surface species concentration, ai is the
Fax: (33) 3 83 59 62 55. activity in solution, Ψ is the electrostatic potential of the surface
† INPL-ENSG.
‡ UPS-CRNS (UMR5563). plane, F is the Faraday constant, R represents the gas constant,
§ UMR 9992-CNRS. and T is the temperature.
10.1021/jp012818s CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/20/2002
2938 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 106, No. 11, 2002 Duval et al.
There are three primary types of surface species responsible kinetic studies3,4 for quartz. The pK values for quartz proposed
for quartz surface electric charge, dissolution, and adsorption/ in the literature22,30 are in the following ranges: pK1 ) 3.0 (
desorption properties, and two of them are produced from neutral 1.0 and pK2 ) 7.0 ( 1.0 for reactions 1 and 2, respectively.
silanol species >SiOH0, which undergo protonation and depro- These values are valid for constant capacitance model (CCM)
tonation in acidic and basic solutions. It is not correct to assume of the electric double layer (EDL) with a capacitance of 1 F/m2.
these reactions as consecutive ones where both hydrogen ions They allow one to calculate the isoelectric point for quartz, i.e.,
are bounded to the same single oxygen atom. In this case the pH of the solution in which the electrophoretic mobility or
difference between the consecutive pK values has to be larger streaming potential (ζ potential) of quartz equals zero. The range
than 10, which is not observed experimentally. Therefore, other of pHiep values reported in the literature, from 0.5 to 3.5,26 is in
surface reactions were proposed27 where two oxygen atoms are agreement with value 2.0 predicted from the model. As a first
bonded to each metal atom: approximation, we use this model in our surface speciation
calculation for quartz as the CCM is the simplest EDL model.
>[Me(OH2)2]+ ) >Me(OH2)OH + H+ This model was used successfully for a number of various types
of solids in aqueous solutions.32 The density of quartz sites
>Me(OH2)OH ) >[Me(OH)2]- + H+ depends on the type of crystal plane developed. We used the
value 8 sites/nm2, which is the average for 001 and 101 planes
In this case it is considered, as a basic unit of a 2-pK model, and is widely used in surface complexation modeling.22,23
two neighboring oxygen atoms coordinated to a different metal The MINTEQA2 computer program33 was used to calculate
center. This assumption explains the small splitting of the two the equilibrium species and surface speciation equilibriums in
pK values derived from experimental results. the system SiO2(s)-H2O-HNO3-KOH system. This program
As a simpler explanation, a single protonation step, a 1-pK combines surface equilibriums, homogeneous solution equilib-
model, can be considered for which a surface reaction can be riums, and mass balance calculation. The set of equations
described: obtained is solved by iteration using the Newton-Raphson
method. The activity coefficients of free aqueous ions were
>[MeOH2] +1/2 ) >[MeOH] -1/2 + H+ calculated by means of the Davies equation.
Previous Spectroscopic Studies of Quartz and Silica
As was concluded from theoretical consideration,27 in most cases Surfaces. For over last 50 years, a significant amount of
the 1-pK model provides a sufficiently accurate description of information on the surface chemical groups of quartz and silica-
the proton titration of surface groups, whereas the 2-pK model water interface has been collected using IR spectroscopy.
can describe all titration data. The proton titration measurements, Unfortunately, the majority of these spectroscopic data describe
similarly as electrokinetic ones, give macroscopic information. transformation surface of OH groups during heating of silica
They cannot deliver direct information about the real composi- or quartz sample to very high temperature, up to 1000 °C.
tion and structure of surface groups. Several steps of surface dehydration are clearly identified;
Of these three surface species listed for the classical 2-pK however, there is no detail information available on the surface
model, only the >SiOH0 has been directly observed on quartz group presence in room temperature. The total concentration
or silica surface using spectroscopic (mostly infrared-based) of OH groups on fully hydroxylated surface of silica does not
techniques. The other two surface species have been conven- depend on their origins and specific surface areas being a
tionally postulated, as for other simple oxides, to describe the physicochemical constant: 4.9 OH groups/nm2 as determined
surface ionization and resulting charging behavior. The physical by the deuterium-exchange method,17,34 which is also in
meaning of the >SiOH2+ and >SiO- species has not been yet agreement with tritium exchange results (4.6 sites/nm2 34). NMR
well established because of lack of any spectroscopic observa- studies of amorphous silica powders indicate that approximately
tions of these species.7 In this paper we attempted, for the first 47% of surface hydroxyl groups are geminal (i.e., H-bonded
time, to relate the XPS spectroscopic observation of the surface Si(OH)2 groups) and the remaining 53% are single silanol.36
atomic composition of quartz after its contact with aqueous The deprotonation reaction2 has been investigated by Marshall
solutions of different pHs to the corresponding change in quartz et al.,37 who deduced, in good agreement with SCM, a pK2 )
surface speciation and to propose surface complexation model. 7.2 from infrared spectroscopic studies noting OH stretching
It should be underlined that spectral evidence for the presence vibrations induced in the presence of organic compounds
of the three surface groups was found even though the (acetone, phenols) of different acidities. To what extend these
spectroscopic XPS study was performed under high-vacuum findings for amorphous silica may serve as a guide to under-
conditions and held at these conditions for a few hours. The standing the surface chemistry of quartz is still a matter of
existence of the >SiOH2+ and >SiO- surface species inferred debate. For example, in contrast to observations on silica, Gallei
from this approach allows us to propose the 2-pK model and and Parks15 reported the existence of two sharp bands (at 3649
explain the quartz surface charge and dissolution rate variations and 3627 cm-1) on the quartz surface dried at 110 °C. They
with pH both in acid and alkaline solutions. assigned these bands to two different OH sites on the surface.
However, Koretsky et al.,18 using DRIFT spectroscopy, were
Background not able to detect any surface groups besides terminal silanol
Surface Complexation Modeling of Quartz. The acid-base groups at a single type of surface site (band at 3745 cm-1).
properties of quartz and silica surfaces have been extensively The only spectroscopic evidence for the ionization of silanol
investigated. The intrinsic stability constants of reactions 1 and groups on quartz surfaces has been recently obtained by Du et
2 are fairly well-known. They were inferred from surface charge al.,38 who reported, using infrared-visible sum-frequency
data obtained by surface titration of solid powders in various generation, that the water molecules interact with a quartz
electrolyte solutions. It is important to note, however, that most surface via two opposing forces: hydrogen bonding with silanol
of the available information concerns amorphous silica/solution groups at neutral to acid pH and electrostatic interaction with
interfaces and there are only a few titrations2,3,28,29 and electro- charged >SiO- species at pH g 10. However, no quantitative
XPS Surface Group Quantification and Modeling J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 106, No. 11, 2002 2939
atoms are bonded to one silicon surface atom and where the
Figure 7. Relative surface density of three surface species obtained most deprotonated surface sites show the SiO- configuration.
by deconvolution of data presented in Figure 1.
This model of surface protonation is a modification of the
proposition based on theoretical consideration with the assump-
It has to be underlined that the experimentally determined
tion of the two oxygen atoms coordinating metal center.27
amount of the surface SiOH2+ and SiO- groups is nearly equal
A relationship between the predicted, based on the commonly
at pH 2 (Figure 4), which is in a perfect agreement with a value
used SCM (pK1 ) 3.0, pK2 ) 7.0), and the measured in this
pHPZC reported for quartz.23,26
work concentration of the surface species for quartz is plotted
To verify how the results presented in Figures 3 and 4 are in Figure 10. The correlation is positive; i.e., there is a decrease
sensitive to modification of deconvolution parameters, the curve of the >SiOH0 concentration with increasing of pH, which is
fitting was also carried out with a pure Gaussian line shape. In accompanied by the increase in the >SiO- surface concentra-
this case, an additional fourth component at about 534 eV has tions. In contrast, the concentration of the >SiOH2+ surface
to be added to achieve a good fitting (above 0.998). The obtained species is strongly underestimated as the SCM predicts their
results are presented in Figures 6 and 7. They are very similar amount e0.7% at pH 0.
to those obtained with mixed Gaussian-Lorentian band shape. Adsorption of potassium counterions on quartz surface in
The fourth component at about 534 eV is assigned to adsorbed alkaline solutions can be described within a triple layer model
water, which represents nearly 10% of monolayer coverage. This
is in agreement with the reported strong adsorption of water on
>SiO- sites as was proven spectroscopically38 and from
calorimetric measurements.24
The second element that can provide information about
surface composition of quartz is silicon. The Si 2p lines obtained
at different pH’s show a much lower shift with a change of
solution pH than that recorded for O 1s lines. Nevertheless, the
tendency is identical for silicon and oxygen lines (Figures 8
and 2). The highest BE of the Si line is observed for a sample
treated in solution at pH 0, and the lowest BE, for a sample
prepared at pH 8. This observation indicates clearly the presence
of different surface Si sites, which are influenced by the surface
OH2+, OH0, and O- groups. It is important to note that atomic
ratio of the total surface oxygen (after subtraction of the bulk
Si-O-Si oxygen) to the total surface silicon (after subtraction Figure 10. Correlation between predicted and measured in this work
of the bulk silicon) is almost constant and about 1.8 for all quartz concentration of surface species for quartz. SCM calculation was
samples prepared in solution at 0-10 pH. This finding supports performed by assuming pK1 ) 3.0 and pK2 ) 7.0. Numbers at points
the surface structure presented in Figure 5b. indicate pH values.
XPS Surface Group Quantification and Modeling J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 106, No. 11, 2002 2943
(31) Sverjensky, D. A.; Sahai, N. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, (41) Muir, I. J., Bancroft, G. M., Shotyk, W., Nesbitt, H. W. Geochim.
3773. Cosmochim. Acta 1990, 54, 2247.
(32) Lutzenkirchen, J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 217, 8. (42) Mielczarski, J. A.; Cases, J. M.; Alnot, M.; Ehrhardt, J. J. Langmuir
(33) Allison, J. D.; Brown, D. S.; Novo-Gradac, K. J. MINTEAQA2/ 1996, 12, 2519.
PRODEFA2, A geochemical assessment model for enVironmental systems: (43) Stipp, S. L. S.; Hochella, M. F., Jr. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
Version 3.0 user’s manual; U.S. EPA: Athens, GA, 1991. 1991, 55, 1723.
(34) Zhuravlev, L. T. Colloids Surf., A 2000, 173, 1. (44) Hochella, M. F., Jr.; Carim, A. H. Surf. Sci. 1988, 197, L260.
(35) Yates, D. E.; Greiser, F.; Cooper, R.; Healy, T. W. Aust. J. Chem. (45) Thiel, P. A.; Madey, T. E. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1987, 7, 211-385.
1977, 30, 1655. (46) Guy, C.; Schott, J. Chem. Geol. 1989, 78, 181.
(36) Chuang, I.-S., Maciel, G. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 401. (47) Stumm, W. Chemistry of the Solid-Water Interface; J. Wiley &
(37) Marshall, K.; Ridgewell, G. L.; Rochester, C. H.; Simpson, J. J. Sons: New York, 1992.
Chem. Ind. (London) 1974, 19, 775. (48) Stumm, W.; Wollast, R. ReV. Geophys. 1990, 28, 53.
(38) Du, Q.; Freysz, E.; Shen, R. Y. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1994, 72, 238. (49) Kosmulski, M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 208, 543.
(39) Liu, P., Kendelewicz, T., Brown, G. E. Jr., Nelson, E. J., Chambers, (50) Gunko, V. M.; Zarko, V. I.; Leboda, R.; Chibowski, E. AdV. Colloid
S. A. Surf. Sci. 1998, 417, 53-65. Interface Sci. 2001, 91, 1.
(40) Okada, K., Kameshima, Y., Yasumori, A. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, (51) Rudzinski, W.; Charmas, R.; Piasecki, W. Langmuir 1999, 15,
81, 1970. 8553.