Ans 1

The three multinational corporations that operate across borders are Toyota, Chrysler, and General
Motors. However, the businesses experienced an economic catastrophe in 2008. It implies that they will
declare themselves bankrupt. And for that purpose, the business was in dire financial straits. The focus
will be on the main restrictions and the implications of those restrictions in the conventional operating
system that prevent manufacturing from being adjusted to the current economic climate (Каримов &
Набиева, 2022).

Identified Constraints: Cost Reduction & Remuneration Control

Toyota

Global manufacturing is represented by Toyota Manufacture Company. The business, however, filed for
bankruptcy in 2008, and as a result, it is currently experiencing a financial recession that is limiting
output and having an impact on its operating system.

The business had an economic crisis in 2008. Additionally, because of an economic crisis at the time, the
corporation regulated its salary plan. The pay scheme at the time, however, is making the workers quite
happy. As a consequence of this, the employees of the company were unable to function properly,
which negatively impacted the firm's productivity as well as its capacity to maintain a balance in its
output. Examples include the moment when the firm would have failed if it had not paid its staff and
employees. The business was going through a serious financial crisis at the period. Following this, the
business was unable to pay its employees and staff which is why they were underperforming. Their
goods and services become less competitive as a result (Bravi et al., 2021).

Due to its inability to bear the additional costs during the period, Toyota Manufacturing had to adapt its
cost-cutting approach during the economic downturn. This meant that the corporation was unable to
meet the demands and contentment of its clients while also favoring a large number of different
systems (Villena, 2019). The action has a significant overall economic influence on both the corporation's
and the individuals' economies. Examples include a period when a corporation was unable to prioritize a
product that was actually in need since it was experiencing a severe economic crisis at the same time.
Clients are now repairing their goods and in need of servicing, but the business was unable to meet their
needs and the consumers were dissatisfied with the results (Hahn & Chinta, 2022). Overall conduct and
activities halt their services and forecast.

GM Motors

GM Motors firms are also affected by this problem. This is because every firm experienced a financial
recession during the period of lasting influence in every region. The manufacturing company GM motor
also had problems because of this.

Cost reduction, which was the driving force behind the firm's inability to prioritize the highest-quality
goods and services at the time, had an impact on the business's financial situation. The
clients were unable to be happy with their services, and for that reason, the business is unable to sustain
its output. It is having an impact on both their business and their output. GM Motors is one corporation
that operates similarly (Villena, 2019). They were unable to continue their astonishing behaviors.
Because of this, the business was also unable to sustain its goods and services. As a consequence, GM
Motors likewise had this issue, and the firm's situation at the time was dire (Bravi et al., 2021).

Additionally, GM Motors appears like a failing firm. In the year 2008, losses were $12.7 billion, yet the
subsequent year, GM Motors made a show of continuing to be bankrupt.

Instances include the fact that General Motors experienced a similar issue in the year 2008. As a
consequence of the financial crisis, which also had an impact on them, General Motors lost several of its
product offerings. And yet the business was unable to do anything in 2008, to keep the company
running. In this instance, General Motors will appear to make recovery from its predicament and
continue manufacturing in 2009, if it can continue to generate output throughout this financial crisis.
However, the firm was unable to keep up with its capacity levels and infrastructure throughout the
recession. That is the reason General Motors is a loss-making business in 2008.

Chrysler

However, Chrysler too experienced difficulties and was impacted by similar problems, yet the
corporation continued to lose money and emerged from bankruptcy in 2009. That is the purpose of the
Chrysler Corporation and the firm invested some money to get its products and reputation back. The
resources used by the Toyota firm are also used by the Chrysler company. Since Toyota has an
outstanding management program and operations, the firm also preserves its bankruptcy for this reason
(Candelo et al., 2021). And in this instance, when the financial downturn changed the balance of the
industry, Toyota and Chrysler were in the same situation.

In this entire issue, it is significant to keep into consideration the importance of the company's financial
performance when it is impacted by the global recession. At that period, Toyota and certain other
businesses like General Motors and Chrysler are all in a similar situation, but each one adopts a distinct
strategy for maintaining its output and revenue growth. Whereas when Toyota experienced a financial
recession in the year 2008, the firm managed to retain its manufacturing system in the following year
2009 with the aid of a few features and amenities (Bravi et al., 2021).

However GM Motors also encountered this issue, and since General Motors was unable to sustain its
manufacturing system, Toyota Company was chosen as a superior alternative to GM Motors. The
firm Chrysler, in contrast, also experienced the same circumstances during the financial downturn,
however, the firm was developing coping tactics since that period many companies encountered a
significant number of monetary conflicts, and Chrysler experienced the same issue. However, in the
following year 2009, the company of Chrysler maintained its financial crisis based on some share of the
amount, such as $12.7 billion, and it was the aid of the firm for sustaining their business (Yuan et al.,
2019).

The finest examples of ways to manage a firm in any situation are Toyota and Chrysler. It implies that
the finest firm is the one operated by Toyota and Chrysler. The business may continue producing. As for
GM Motors, the business was unable to maintain its level of output, yet despite this, it nevertheless
acted throughout the financial crisis (Flannagan, 2022). They made an effort to improve the product
while still keeping their production during this recession. The business rebounded from the beginning of
the next year, 2009.
Ans 2

Toyota is a major global manufacturer of automobiles. However, the corporation had an economic
catastrophe in 2008 as a result of the global financial crisis that year, which also had an impact on
Toyota, a manufacturer of automobiles. It was September, and the firm was on the verge of bankruptcy
due to damage, reaching, a climax, etc. However, the manufacturing firm attempted to create its system
once more the following year, in 2009. However, that timing indicates that certain of the benefits are
being used by Toyota from the year 2009 to the present (Batth, 2021). These are the benefits that
support the company's growth in the manufacturing sector. The principal benefits are,

Continuous Improvement

A crucial component of Toyota's lean manufacturing method is its continuous improvement program, or
"Kaizen." It is a system-wide strategy to find and get rid of waste, enhance procedures, and boost
effectiveness. Instead of making significant changes seldom, the goal is to make tiny, incremental
improvements regularly. Employees are continually encouraged by the system to find methods to
enhance procedures, which increases productivity and effectiveness (Kaneko, 2020). Toyota was able to
sustain profitability throughout the economic downturn because of its swift manufacturing adjustments
in response to shifting consumer demand. Furthermore, it was able to develop methods to reduce
expenses and run more effectively because of its emphasis on process improvements. Toyota's
performance and effectiveness are rooted in its Continuous Improvement philosophy (Anoop, 2020).

It is predicated on the notion that there is continual space for advancement and that any person,
irrespective of rank, can make a difference in improving the business (Taiichi & Ohno, 2019). This way of
thinking is mirrored in how the business uses tools like Kaizen events, recommendation systems, and
problem-solving teams to find and remove waste, enhance workflow, and boost efficiency. The firm's
capacity to retain profit including during economic downturns while achieving superior levels of quality,
reliability, and efficiency is proof that this strategy is effective. Continuous development is a never-
ending endeavor, and it's one of the main reasons Toyota can maintain an advantage over its rivals
(Flannagan, 2022).

Jidoka

Jidoka, a manufacturing philosophy developed by Toyota, stresses the combination of human

intelligence with technology to increase quality and productivity. It is founded on the notion that devices
ought to be built to automatically halt when an abnormality is discovered, and that a human operator
ought to be informed so that the issue may be resolved (Afriansyah & Mohruni, 2019). This makes sure
that errors are discovered and fixed right away, avoiding issues from being transferred to the next steps
or even the client. Jidoka is a crucial part of Toyota's lean manufacturing method, which aids the
business in maintaining high standards of productivity and quality even in difficult financial
circumstances (Tekin et al., 2020).

Perhaps one of the most crucial roles at the Toyota Corporation is this one. Since the issue provides a
means of identifying issues and acting to address them at any stage of the manufacturing process. The
device functions autonomously identifying problems with the device and assisting in safety stops. The
other essential changes are hoped to be accomplished. For employees to keep working on the different
equipment, the knowledge is also communicated to the various automated systems on the "Kanban"
board on the displays. Through preserving quality and achieving high production, the firm's equipment
excels in assisting with issue prevention (Kim, 2021).

The facility made it simple for the firm that makes Toyota to expand its manufacturing capabilities, and
it also helps the business produce high-quality equality machines. If the business recently discovered
problems with its system, it employed its jidoka method at that time, and the Toyota manufacturing firm
immediately identified the primary problems and fixed the system. That being the case, the Toyota
manufacturer was unable to sustain its operations and facilities during the crisis. Because of this,
Toyota's benefits firm was unable to sustain its goods and services (Tekin et al., 2020).

J-I-T

Toyota's Just-In-Time (JIT) production strategy is centered on creating the appropriate parts in the
appropriate amount and at the appropriate time. Only purchasing components and materials as
required, is an inventory management approach that minimizes stock and lowers waste. Toyota can
swiftly adapt to consumer demand shifts and maintain inventory costs down as a result. JIT also
contributes to shorter production schedules and quicker deliveries, which boosts both
consumer satisfaction and productivity. Toyota's Lean Production strategy is fundamentally based on JIT,
which is essential to the firm's ability to continue operating profitably and effectively even during
challenging economic conditions (Anoop, 2020).

Toyota's business consistently emphasizes the crucial equipment that is required. They also pay
attention to things like and where when they are utilized. Since they contribute at the appropriate
moment and in the proper quantity, they always possess the essential systems. It implies that the firm
that makes Toyota always keeps the essential components and systems on hand. The just-in-time
procedure in this instance is centered on the Kanban system, which also offers an automated goods
supply. This is another system that aids the business's lean manufacturing techniques. The Toyota
Corporation consistently met its deadlines and carried out its operations, but in 2008, the global
financial crisis had an impact, and the corporation was no longer able to do so (Kim, 2021).

Because of the severe financial crisis, the firm was going through at the time, they were regulating their
cost-minimization function, which had an impact on their manufacturing systems. Every firm has to
operate "just in time," and this is especially true of manufacturing organizations (Butollo & Krzywdzinski,
2019). "Just in time" refers to the product that is delivered or the company's output. One of the main
factors that boost an organization's performance and serve the firm well is just-in-time (Loyd, 2020).
Due to the global economic crisis that had an impact on every organization's business in the years
between 2007 and 2008, Toyota also lost this possibility. The progress of any nation is influenced by the
marketplace. The effects of the global economic crisis have disrupted the just-in-time procedure. The
just-in-time effect has been disrupted, which consequently influences the nation's economy (Batth,
2021).

Quality design

This is among the company's crucial production-related points. Due to this facility, the business
constantly upgrades its layout and functionality, and it places a high priority on its modernized
components and systems. Another area of internal strength is the assistance it receives in raising
output. However, before 2008, Toyota's corporation consistently boosted growing demands and
contentment by providing high-quality design (Flannagan, 2022).

Additionally, with the aid of this functionality, the business can meet customer demand with ease. That
is why the corporation consistently produces a large volume of its goods. But in 2008, the business
experienced a multitude of economic challenges, including a worldwide crisis. Additionally, their firm's
efforts to decrease costs have an impact on this system. Furthermore, the firm was unable to deliver the
essential role and system for the client, resulting in the fact that Toyota was unable to sustain the
functioning of their designer component, and the client swiftly lost business for their upgraded facilities.
This factor influences the output of the business (Kumara et al., 2020).

Toyota is a manufacturing firm that is being discussed. However, the business had a severe economic
collapse in 2008 (Fukuzawa, 2019). Toyota Corporate has various benefits at that time based on some
operations of the company. Additionally, the benefits aid the business in boosting output. However,
these benefits are the ones that are unable to support the company and its products since they depend
on raising output and expanding the market. Additionally, benefits include keeping customers, meeting
their demands, using modern, sustainable facilities, etc. Overall, the actions aid the business in stepping
up its operations (Flannagan, 2022).

Because of the financial crisis, the firm was unable to operate successfully and customers were unable
to be satisfied with their work in 2008. As a result, the company's overall advantages were transformed
into negative issues, and they were unable to be maintained (Yamamoto, 2019).

Ans 3

Gross Profit Margin Calculation

Current Year Previous Year

Gross Profit 86400 Gross Profit 86400

Net Sales 240000 Net Sales 216000

Gross Profit Margin = Gross Profit / Net Sales Gross Profit Margin = Gross Profit / Net Sales
86400 / 240000 86400 / 216000
36% 40%

The firm's gross profit was identical across both periods, and it is worth $86,400 to the business. One of
the most significant financial ratio measures utilized to assess an organization’s performance and
estimate its profit growth is the margin of gross profit. Currently, at 36%, the firm's gross profit margin is
lower than the 40% it had the year before. Therefore, among the key financial factors that aid in
determining economic growth is the gross profit margin.

The main reason for this difference between gross profit margin is the different levels of net sales. In the
current year, the net sales amounted to $240,000. Whereas in the previous year, the net sales had an
amount of $216,000. Therefore even when the firm generated the exact same gross profit levels in both
the years, there was a difference in the amount of net sales, owing to the near identical but slightly
different gross profit margins.

Ans 4

Vertical Analysis

Components Current Year Preceding Year % of Net Sales % of Net Sales

(Current Year) (Previous Year)

Net Sales 240000 216000 - -

Purchases 84720 59760 35% 28%

Inventory Materials

Increase/ (6000) 6000 (3%) 3%

Decrease

Inventory Labor

Increase/ 4000 (4000) 2% (2%)

Decrease

Inventory Overhead

Increase/ 2000 (2000) 1% (1%)

Decrease

Total Materials 84720 59760 35% 28%

Cost

Processing Costs

Factories 26400 27600 11% 13%

Wages
 Factories 5040 4800 2% 2%
Salaries

Factories 16800 12000 7% 6%

Benefits &
Perks
Service & 5280 6000 2% 3%
Supply

Equipment & 4800 4560 2% 2%

Depreciation

Scrap 4800 9600 2% 4%

Total 63120 64560 26% 30%

Processing
Costs
Occupancy Costs

Building 480 480 Negligible Negligible

Depreciation

Building 5280 4800 2% 2%

Services

Total 5760 5280 2% 2%

Occupancy
Costs
Costs of Goods 153600 129600 64% 60%
Sold

By representing all values as a proportion of a base amount, a method called vertical analysis, often
referred to as common-size analysis, is used to assess financial information. This enables straightforward
comparisons across various periods and businesses. It removes the effects of size discrepancies and
enables more appropriate comparison by presenting all numbers as a proportion of a base quantity
(Lakada et al., 2017).  For seeing patterns and variations over time, vertical analysis is extremely
beneficial. For instance, a firm may be getting less proficient if its sales have climbed by 5% over the last
year but its cost of selling goods has grown by 10%.

According to this, if a firm's gross profit margin has not changed yet its net income has declined, this
might indicate that the organization is dealing with higher expenditures. Comparing several businesses
within the same sector is another benefit of vertical analysis. It removes the effects of size discrepancies
and enables more precise evaluation by presenting all numbers as a fraction of a base quantity. The
latter firm may be more effective or have a superior pricing strategy, for instance, if one entity has a
gross profit margin of 30% whereas another has a gross profit margin of 35%. Overall, vertical analysis is
a crucial tool for financial research since it makes it simple to compare data from various organizations
and historical periods, and it aids in spotting trends and fluctuations over time (Lakada et al., 2017).

The above comprehensive analysis displays the numerous data variations, and a vertical analysis is used
to determine the proportion of the expense of sales items. This statistic demonstrates that the firm's
purchasing for the present year represents 35% of its sales revenue, compared to 28% for the prior year,
indicating a rise in the purchasing values. Additionally, the amount of the Inventories Material and the
proportion of this item may rise or fall.

There is a reduction in the worth of the inventory materials since the sales costs are -3% in the present
period as opposed to 3% in the preceding year. Inventory labor's worth can also rise or fall, and its
contribution to the firm's net sales as a proportion of the cost of goods sold this year is 2%, compared to
-2% last year. Although the proportion of this element to the firm's cost of goods sold has increased.
Inventory Overhead is a different item of cost of goods sold, and its proportion is 1% in the present year
compared to -1% in the prior year, even though its value has increased.

There has been a rise in the costs of the materials, which is why the firm's performance is appearing this
way. The entire material cost of the business is included under the costs of goods sold, and its
proportion of overall sales is 35% this year compared to 28% last year. The initial item of working out
the expenses is factory wages, which is also referred to as an item of the costs of goods sold. As for the
present period, this specific item's proportion of overall sales is 11%, whereas it was 13% in the last
period.

As a result, the worth of this item has decreased, which indicates that the firm has lowered its cost for
the present period, as seen by the value's appearance. Factory salaries, which are a portion of the firm's
processing expenses, make up the next element of the sales-related cost. The worth of this item, which
makes up 2% of the firm's overall sales in both the present and previous calendar years, has not
changed; as a result, the firm has not raised the cost of factory employee salaries.

Factory benefits, which are also a component of the processing expenses, are the next element of the
sales-related cost. There has also been a decrease in the price of factory perks as the sales costs as a
fraction in the present period is 7%, down from 6% in the prior year. The costs of goods sold also
comprises the expense of supply and service; this element's share in the present year's costs of goods
sold is 2%, whereas it was 3% in the prior year. In addition to this, the worth of this item also
demonstrates how much less expensive the firm's resources and materials are.

The following sales-related cost element is Equipment and Depreciation, which accounts for 2% of the
firm's overall selling costs and was at a similar level in the prior year. Scrap is also another cost of
goods sold element, and its share in the present year's sales-related cost is 2%.  Before then, it was 4%.
Building depreciation results in an identical percentage for the business in both years. The second
element is building services, which make up 2% of the total sales cost in the present period but
maintained the same proportion in the year prior. The firm's overall sales-related costs in the prior year
were 129600, but in the present year, it is 153600.
References

 Anoop. (2020). 8 v May 2020 http://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020 - Researchgate.

Retrieved January 21, 2023, from
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anoop-G-M/publication/341784321_A_Brief_Over
view_on_Toyota_Production_System_TPS/links/6282ff4edcb5ce0499d6b0c4/A-Brief-
Overview-on-Toyota-Production-System-TPS.pdf
 Batth. (2021). Toyota Motor Corporation: Just in time (JIT ... - xim university. xim.
Retrieved January 21, 2023, from https://xim.edu.in/jcr/cases/Case03-June2021-
ToyotaMotorCorporation.pdf
 Bravi, L., Murmura, F., & Santos, G. (2021). The ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management
System Standard: Companies' drivers, benefits and barriers to its implementation.
Quality Innovation Prosperity. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from https://www.qip-
journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/view/1277
 Flannagan. (2022). Which quality model is better for your business: Six sigma or the
Toyota model. Wisconsin edu. Retrieved January 21, 2023, from
https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/83263/Flannagan%2c%20James.pdf?
sequence=1
 Kaneko. (2020). Toyota Motor Corporation’s Culture strategy - rmci.ase.ro. ase.ro.
Retrieved January 21, 2023, from https://www.rmci.ase.ro/no21vol4/04.pdf
 kim. (2021). The transformation and evolution of Japan’s Manufacturing Industries: A ...
research gate. Retrieved January 21, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jae-
Hoon-Kim-18/publication/361084250_The_Transformation_and_Evolution_of_Japan
%27s_Manufacturing_Industries_A_Case_Study_about_Toyota_and_Toshiba_after_the_
Global_Financial_Crisis/links/62a7ce0c55273755ebeb23e5/The-Transformation-and-
Evolution-of-Japans-Manufacturing-Industries-A-Case-Study-about-Toyota-and-
Toshiba-after-the-Global-Financial-Crisis.pdf
 Kumara, Singh, A., Shivajee, V., Sharma, V. K., Shao, Z., Sauve, S., Sarkis, J., Sabaei,
D., Ranta, V., Rajput, S., Prakash, C., Papadopoulos, A., Oesterreich, T. D., Nowicka, K.,
Muduli, K., Moser, E., Moldavska, A., Moktadir, M. A., Mittal, S., … Barnidge, E. K.
(2020, October 10). Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of
Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Analysis of barriers. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344920305322?
casa_token=Q_XwPJZFU4sAAAAA
%3AfmOfr9fmO8cYQNnqNIDxAhlUh1129a1lGVIBGpmsrVSiffenKjjhmtmwJJ1CyD8i
07PEZr7zwOFV
 Lakada, M. N., Lapian, S. L. H. V. J., & Tumiwa, J. R. (2017). Analyzing the financial
statement using horizontal â€" vertical analysis to evaluating the company Financial
Performance period 2012-2016 (Case study at pt. Unilever Indonesiatbk). Jurnal
EMBA : Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Retrieved January 22,
2023, from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/emba/article/view/18270
 Tekin, M., Arslandere, M., Etlio, M., Koyuncuo, &O., & Tekin, E. (2020, January 1). An
application of SMED and Jidoka in lean production. SpringerLink. Retrieved January 22,
2023, from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92267-6_45
 Yamamoto. (2019). A review of the development of Lean Manufacturing and related lean
... Research gate. Retrieved January 21, 2023, from
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Lloyd-13/publication/340449306_A_review
_of_the_development_of_lean_manufacturing_and_related_lean_practices_The_case_of
_Toyota_production_system_and_managerial_thinking/links/
5f970170a6fdccfd7b7fe1c8/A-review-of-the-development-of-lean-manufacturing-and-
related-lean-practices-The-case-of-Toyota-production-system-and-managerial-
thinking.pdf
 Каримов, Н., & Набиева, Ф. (2022). Benchmarking the secret of success of automobile
companies. Экономика и образование. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://cedr.tsue.uz/index.php/journal/article/view/656
 Hahn, T. W., & Chinta, R. (2022). Emerging market firms' response to U.S. economic
recession and the subsequent period's performance. ScholarWorks. Retrieved January 22,
2023, from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/ijamt/vol20/iss1/5/
 Villena. (2019). The missing link? the strategic role of ... - Wiley Online Library. Wiley
Online. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/poms.12980
 Candelo, E., Troise, C., Matricano, D., Lepore, A., & Sorrentino, M. (2021, May 18).
The evolution of the pathways of innovation strategies in the automotive industry. the
case of Fiat Chrysler automobiles. European Journal of Innovation Management.
Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJIM-01-2021-0058/full/
 Yuan, X., Yoo, S. H., Wang, K., Wagner, S. M., Shin, H., Proch, M., Paulraj, A., Müller,
H. M., Li, H., Li, Y., Lei, D., Keren, B., Kee, R., Fercoq, A., Bock, S., Autry, C. W.,
Ahn, S., Allen, D.-M., Balachandran, K. R., … Ghoshal, S. (2019, July 26). Sustainable
waste and cost reduction strategies in a strategic buyer-supplier relationship. Journal of
Cleaner Production. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619326459?
casa_token=XXv1qmeHxuUAAAAA%3AjSq4bd1mpFqshMAArWBYZlZSg4Rrn-
oa6mQoZUz3pw1pw1sJJPyPMJe6n6RVbYVBeZHoHM8nfNdf
 Loyd. (2020). Development of a lean assessment tool and measuring the effect of culture
from employee perception. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.
Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMTM-10-2019-0375/full/html?
casa_token=7pI2aX9RVRsAAAAA
%3A3F0m6vctn2tCWsjY6cFvP7tijIxC5qOX2yzeUA5EPWhR2k_qtvT6zNStL8SEBl8B
CXS1gg02MDE3CzBAMtpv1OwiGHrbAdNjrUnxrUuqlqk07W4syLwd2Q
 Taiichi, & Ohno. (2019, March 1). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale
production: Taiichi Ohn. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780429273018/toyota-production-
system-taiichi-ohno-norman-bodek
 Afriansyah, A., & Mohruni, A. S. (2019). Production planning and control system with
just in time and Lean Production: A Review. Journal of Mechanical Science and
Engineering. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://jmse.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jmse/article/view/31
 Butollo, F., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2019, January 1). From lean production to Industrie
4.0: More autonomy for employees? SpringerLink. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_3
 Fukuzawa, M. (2019, June 15). Critique on the Lean Production System Research.
Annals of Business Administrative Science. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/18/3/18_0190403a/_article/-char/ja/