The Indian Penal Code, 1860 fundamental principle of criminal is embodied in the maxim “actus non nisi mens sit rea”, The maxim was fit ru eloped bY ni Equity Courts ee Law Courts jo saat Tone of the above, mon : Nizamat Court ‘ ain’ means 7 ne awful means of property which 0) gre erson gaining is not entitled fran by wlawful means of property which she person gaining is not entitled «ov eby unlawful means of property which gi erson gaining is entitled ail the above. avrongful loss’ means ‘oes by unlawful means of property which the person losing it, is legally entitled Joss by lawful means of property which the person losing it is not legally entitled Joss by lawful means of property which the person losing is not legally entitled {¢) all the above. The provision of personation at elections under section 171D of IPC (a) shall apply to a person who has been authorised to vote as proxy for an elector under any law in force () shall not apply to a person who has been authorised to vote as proxy for an elector under any law in force (c) does not lead to any restriction under any law in force (d) none of the above, ‘Dishonestly’ has been defined as doing anything with intention to cause wrongful gain to one person & wrongful loss to another, under (@) section 21 (b) section 23 (0. section 24 (d) section 25. @ 6 10. Ww ‘Traudutently’ tan been defined a6 doing anything with Intent to defraud (a) section 23 (b) section 25 (©) section 24 (a) section 26. When a criminal act Ia done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all (a) each of such person is Hable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone each of such person is liable for his own overt act (c) each of such person shall be liable according to the extent of his participation in the crime (d) both (b) & (c). Which among these Codes, is included in the Schedule to the Prevention of Money- Laundering Act, 2002. (a) Civil Procedure Code (b) Criminal Procedure Code (c) Indian Penal Code (d) none of these, To establish section 34 of IPC (a) common intention be proved but not overt act be proved common intention and overt act both be proved (©) common intention need not be proved but overt act be proved (d) all the above, Section 34 of IPC (a) creates a substantive offence (b) isa rule of evidence (©) both (a) and (b) (@)_ neither (a) nor (b). . ‘X! & “Y’ go to murder ‘Z’. ‘X’ stood on guard with a spear in hand but did not hit ‘Z’ at all. Y killed ‘2’ (a) only ‘Y’ is liable for murder of Z (b) ‘X’ & “Y’ both are liable for murder of ‘Z’ (b) )(©) NX is not Liable as he did not perform any overt act (A) both (a) & (o). 12. ‘Voluntarily’ has been defined as_an effect caused by means whereby a person intended to cause it or by means, at the tine of employing those means, know or had reason to believe to be likely to cause it under fa) section (b) section 38 (©) section 37 (a) section 40. 13. Under section 45 of IPC, life denotes (a) life ofa human being (b) life of an animal (©)_ life of human being and of an ai (@) life of either human being or animal. 14. Under section 46 of IPC, death denotes (a) death of a human being (b) death of an animal (©) death of a human being and of an animal both (d) death of either human being or an animal. 15. Ilegal signifies (a) everything which is an offence (b) everything which is prohibited by law (©) everything which furnishes ground for civil action (d) all the above. 16. Animal denotes (a) any living creature including human being (b) any living creature other than a human being (©) any creature - live or dead (d) either (a) or (c). 17. How many types of punishments have been prescribed under the Indian Penal Code (a) three (b) six (©) five (d) four. 18. Under section 60 of IPC, in certain cases of imprisonment, the sentence of imprisonment (a) has to be wholly rigorous (b) has to be wholly simple (©) canbe partly rigorous and partly simple (d) cither (a) or (b). 19. Sentence of imprisonment for non-payment of fine under section 64 of IPC (a) shall be in excess of any gp, imprisonment to which an offendey 7 been sentenced " (b) shall be concurrent of imprisonment (0) shall_ not be in excess of any othe, imprisonment (d)_ both (b) & (c). 20. Under section 65 of IPC sentence of imprisonment for non-payment of fine shat be limited to (a) one-third of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence . (v) one-fourth of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence : (©) one-half of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence (@) equal to the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence, 21. In case of an offence punishable with fine only, imprisonment for non-payment of fine (a) has to be rigorous (b) has to be simple (©) canbe rigorous or simple (d) can be partly rigorous and partly simple. 22. Under section 498A of IPC cruelty includes (a) harassment of the woman () physical cruelty only (© mental cruelty only (d) cruelty by wife. 23, In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine of not exceeding Rs. 100 but exceeding Rs. 50, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed (a) two months (b) three months (©) four months (d)_ six months. 24. In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay? fine exceeding Rs. 100, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed (a) one year (b) six months (©) four months (d)_ two months. 25, Section 64 of IPC provides for . (a) nature & maximum limit of imprisons for non-payment of fine ANY other ent39, er section 80, the exception of accident 1 ole when av offence is committed while doing. a lawful act inva lawful manner by awful means doing a law(ul act in any manner by any means doing a Lawful act ina lawful manner by any means (A) all the above. 40. The principle as to the way in which a man should behave when he has to make a choice between tivo evils is illustrated in (a). section 80 of IPC {b) section 81 of IPC (©) section 82 of IPC (@)_ section 78 of IPC. 41. The motive under section 81 of IPC should be {a)__ prevention of harm to person (b) prevention of harm to property (€)_ both (a) and (b) (@) either (a) or (b). 42. ‘Infancy’ as an exception has been provided under (a) section 80 (b) section 81 (c) section 82 (a) section 84. 43, Section 82 of IPC provides that nothing is an offence which is done by a child under (a) six years of age (b) seven years of age (c)_ nine years of age (4) ten years of age. 44. Section 82 of IPC enunciates (a) a presumption of fact (b) a rebuttable presumption of law (©) a conclusive or irrebuttable presumption of law (d) none of the above. 45. A person is stated to be partially incapax under section 83, IPC if he is aged (a) above seven years and under twelve years (0) above seven years and under ten years (©) above seven years and under sixteen years (d) above seven years and under eighteen years. 46. Section 83 of IPC lays down (a) a presumption of fact ©) 47. 48. 49. 51. ()) an inconclusive or rebuttable presumption of law ()eondunive or irrebuttable presumption of law () in Section 82 of II" (a) wholly inca (b)_ partially incapox (c)_ both (a) & () (d) either (a) or (b)- Under section 82 & section 83 of IPC an offence is punishable if it is done by a child (a) of below seven years of age (b) of above seven years of age but belay tw years if he has not attained sufficient maturity and understanding (©) of above seven years of age but below twelve years having attained sufficient maturity and understanding (d) all the above. Which of the following pair is not correctly matched? (a) Mens Rea—R. v. Prince (b) Necessity - D.P.P. v. Beard (Q)_ Insanity - Me’Naughten case (d) Intoxication - Basudeo v. State of Pepsu. ‘The maxim ‘actus non facit rea nisi mens sit rea’ means (a) crime has to be coupled with guilty mind (b) there can be no crime without a guilty mind (Q) crime is the result of guilty mind (@) criminal mind leads to crime. “In every statute, mens rea is to be implied unless the contrary is shown.” This view was expressed in (a) Sherras v. De Rutzen (b) R.v. Dudley & Stephen (©) Harding v. Price (d) R. v. Prince. ‘buttable prenurnption of fact Jays down the rule of 1% . I. The physical aspect of crime is actus reas. ns rea. Il. The mental aspect of crime is » Ill. The motive is the desire to commit crime Which of the following is correct for the aforesaid (a) 1 & Hare correct but III is not correct (b) only 0 & I (©) only H&M (a) all the above.53 4 Section 84 of IPC provides for {a)_ medical insanity (b) legal insanity (moral insanity (a) unsoundness of mind of any kind, Juvsistible impulse isa defence fa) inindia (by inFaglond (© inlndiaand (a) neither in India nor in England, Ahangman who hangs the prisoners pursuant to the onder of the court is exempt from criminal liability by virtue of {a)_ section 77 of IPC {b) section 78 of IPC {@)_ section 79 of IPC {@)_ section 76 of IPC. __ Insanity as a defence means that a person at the time of doing an act, by reason of unsoundness of mind is incapable of knowing fa) the nature of the act {b) that what he is doing is wrong (Q) that what he is doing is contrary to law (@) either (a) or (b) or (c). Which of the following is correct (a) the burden of proof that the accused was not insane at the time of commission of offence is on the prosecution (b) the burden of proving that the accused was insane at the time of commission of offence is on the accused (c) there is a rebuttable presumption of fact that accused was insane at the time of commission of the offence (@) it is a matter of inference to be drawn by the court on the facts proved by the prosecution. For unsoundness of mind, the impairment of the cognitive faculty of mind to escape criminal liability (a) must be total (b) must be partial (©) both (a) & (b) (d) none of the above. Intoxication as defence is contained in (@) section 85 of IPC (b) section 86 of IPC (9 section 87 of IPC (d) both (a) & (b). 60, 61. 62. 63. 64. 66. 67. For a defence of intoxication, to escape criminal liability, the degeneration of mental faculties (a) must be total (b) must be partial (6) both (a) & (b) (d)_ only (b) above is correct & (a) 18 incorrect For a defence of intoxication, to escape criminal liability, the intoxication (a). canbe self administered (b) administered against his will or knowledge (c)_ should not be self administered (d) all the above. In cases where the act involves a specific mens rea, in cases of intoxication under section 86 of IPC (a)_ the existence of mens rea is presurned (b) the specific mens rea is not presumed (©) the specific mens rea depends upon the attending circumstances & the degree of intoxication (d) none of the above. The doctrine ‘volenti non fit injuria’ is contained in (a) section 87 of [PC (b) section 88 of [PC (©) section 89 of IPC (2) all the above. The defence of ‘consent’ applies to (a) private wrongs (b) public wrongs (©) both (a) & (b) (d) neither (a) nor (b). The defence of ‘consent’ is restrictive in its applicability in cases involving (@) alienable rights (b) inalienable rights (©) both (a) &(b) (d) neither (a) nor (b). The defence of ‘consent’ is not available in cases of (a) consent to cause death (b) consent to cause grievous hurt ()_ both (a) & (6) (d) either (a) or ). Operation of consent to all offences, short of causing death intentionally, has been extended under (a) section 88 of IPC (b) section 90 of IPC(©) section 9L of IRC (a) section 87 of WC. 68 Under section 89 the consent i respect of infants under 12 years of age or persons of amsound mind (a) can be given by their guardians without any restriction can be given by the guardian subject 10 restrictions mutually agreed upon can be given by the guardians subject to restrictions imposed by law {d) all the above, 69, The consent is not a valid consent under section 90 (a) if given under a misconception of fact (b) if given by a person of unsound mind {0 tfpiven by a child below 12 years of aBe (a) all the above. 70. Consent given under compul of threat of injury (a) excuses the causing of death {) excuses causing of any offence against the state punishable with death (©) both (a) & (0) (@) neither (a) nor (b). 71, The maxim ‘de minimus non curat Tex’ means @)_ law would not take action on small & trifling matter (b) law does not ignore any act which causes © i) (©) fear of Injury oF sion arising out the slightest harm law would not take action in serious matters (d) alll the above. 72. The principle ‘de minimus non curat lex’ is contained in (a)_ section 92 of IPC (b) section 93 of IPC (©) section 94 of IPC (d) section 95 of IPC. 73. The right of private defence is contained in (a) section 94 of IPC (b) section 95 of IPC (©) section 96 of IPC (d) section 98 of IPC. 74. The right to private defence is based on the natural instinct of (a) self-preservation (b) self-respect 15. 16. 77. 78. 79. 81. (co) self-uufficteney. (a) self relia "The right to prlval (a) unrentrict (hb) aubject tor 99 of IPC (o)_ subject to ree iV of IPC (dy subject to @ air provision of IPC. Je defence In hder all circurnstances te defence In rietlon contalned In ecting trletions contained In Chapter eatrictions contained in a reste any Right to prival available un (a) ) vailable where there fe Une t0 have the Fecourve 19 the protection of public authorities (o available where there is ro time to have fecourse to the protection of public authorities (d) all of the above. ‘The law on private defence in India ig the same as in England @) {b) is narrower than the one in England (9) is wider than the one in England (a) none of the above. ‘The right to private defence is available with respect to (a) harm to body (b) harm to movable property {¢)_ harm to immovable property (d) all the above. Under section 98 right to private defence also is available against a (@) person of unsound mind (b) person who does not have maturity of understanding (©) both (a) & (6) (d) neither (a) nor (b). . Every person has a right of private defence of his own body and the body of any other person against any offence affecting the human body, has been provided (a) under section 96 of IPC (b) under section 97 of IPC (©) under section 98 of IPC (a) under section 99 of IPC. Every person has a right of private defence of his property or of any other person against certain offences affecting the property, has been provided (a) under section 95 of IPCSt 66. . Rig) Jy ander section 86 oF IPL Ay under section 87 oF ” ator section U8 OF IN «oo eight of private defence be net available » the aggresset we Y the pevsinn whe bs attacked Hy Ww w fod to the srivate defence by the person attacked (a) only (a) & ©) are core Jracase of ee fight between hyo parties fa) ight ot private cefenee is avaiable to both ayssor against an det done in the parties 4) right-of private defence is available to jnetiviatvals against inctividtual no right of private defence ix available ( either patty right private defence is available only to U l © ” fone party: Under section 99, the Tight of pri ate defence available at all against public servants fa) wot Jin the discharge of their lawful engages duties: Syailable under all circumstances agains sublic servants engaged in the discharge of their lawlul duties Qvailable against public servants only (hen their acts cause reasonable apprehension of death or grievous hurt ‘vailable against public’ servants only when their acts cause reasonable apprehension of damage to property. hit to private defence under section 99 {a) extends to causing more harm than is necessary for the purpose of defence does not extend to causing more harm than is necessary for the purpose of defence does not extend to causing the harm necessary for the purpose of defence (g) restricts the harm caused to be less than the one necessary for the purpose of defence. Right of private defence extends to causing death, under the circumstances laid down in (a) sections 100 & 101 of IPC (b) sections 101 & 102 of IPC (©) sections 102 & 103 of IPC {d) sections 100 & 103 of IPC. o 0 id) ) WW? an, 8, 90. on. 92. 93. oof the body extends Wight of private dete er dealt with ander te caustiy death bie} (a) nections bof HC (b) section tL of HC (©) seetion 102 of IPC (a) section LOY of IPC Right of extending, with ander (a) seetion 100. Of IPC (b) section 102 of 1P¢ (©) section 101 of 1PC (a) section 100 of 1PC In cases of assautt apprehension of death or Night of private defence extends voluntarily (a) causing grievous hurt (b) causing death (©) causing any harm other than death (a) causing any harm other than death oF grievous hurt In cases of assault with intention of committing rape or of gratifying unnatural lust, the right of private defence extends voluntarily (a) causing any harm including death (v) causing any harm other than death (©) causing any harm other than grievous hurt (a) both b) & (0). In cases of kidnapping & abduction the right of private defence extends voluntarily causing (a) any harm other than death (b) any harm other than death & grievous hurt (©) any harm including death (a). both (a) & (b). In cases of robbery or dacoity, the right of private defence extends voluntarily causing (a) any harm including death (b) any harm other than death (©) any harm other than grievous hurt (d)_ both (b) & (©). Where a wrong doer commits house breaking by night, the right to private defence extends to voluntarily causing (a) any harm other than death (b) any harm including death (©) any harm other than death and grievous hurt defence of property paivate cath haw been dealt causing, reasonable grievous hurt, theor) 95, 98. Where a wrong leads to mischief by fire on @ building used as a human dwelling or a place for custody of property the right of private defence extends voluntarily causing (a) any harm including death }) any harm other than death any harm other than death é& grievous hurt d) either (b) or (c), Under section 102 of IPC the right to private defence of the body a) commences as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises and continues as long a5 that apprehension continues (b) commences as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises and continues even after _that apprehension ceases (©) commences only when the assault is actually done & continues during the period of assault (4) commences only when the assault is actually done & continues after the assailant has left. © . Under section 105 of IPC, the right of private defence of property in cases of theft commences when a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property commences and (a) continues till the offender has effected his o retreat with the pro ) continues till the assistanc i authorities is obtained ane (c) continues till the toperty been recovered a tas (d) all the above. Section 106 of IPC extends the right of pri E f ate defean, 1 of private cane in case of apprehension of death, to (a) any harm other than di a innocent person ee a ) any harm other than gri cere in grievous hurt to any (¢) any harm including deat innocent pee ig death to any innocent (d) none of the above. Chapter V of Indian Penal i yh ‘enal Code deals with (b) attempt=) election (d) religion. 90, Right of private defence is not available (a) against any act which in itself is not an offence (b) against any act which is not legal wrong (c) against any act which is a moral wrong (d) all the above. 100. Section 97 of IPC extends the right of private defence of property, to the offence of (a) cheating (b) misappropriation (c) theft & robbery (d) criminal breach of trust. ~~