You are on page 1of 7

Robert Gober Each work reveled in its handmade homeliness.

The
American, b. 1954 exhibition offered a whole new hypothesis for sculpture,
one that affirmed the seriality of Minimalism while
Commissions celebrating the virtues of the handcrafted. That the
Untitled (1999) sinks had no provision for plumbing also signaled a
Exhibitions Surrealist edginess that would remain a signature of the
Sculpture Inside Outside (1988; catalogue), Duchamp’s Leg work. Then too, the exhibition came at the height of the
(1994; catalogue, tour), Robert Gober: Sculpture + Drawing AIDS epidemic, and it was remarked early on that the
(1999; catalogue, tour), The Cities Collect (2000) unplumbed sinks functioned something like surrogates
Holdings for the dead, deprived as they were of that which
4 sculptures, 2 photographs, 1 slide projection, 6 edition prints/ defined their nature. This resolve to deal with the poli-
proofs, 1 portfolio of prints, 1 multiple, 1 book tics of disease would continue in Gober’s work through-
out the 1980s. Yet, in the sinks (and succeeding works
such as male legs protruding from walls, some embed-
In 1984, Robert Gober had his first solo exhibition. For ded with drains or candles), Gober is continually drawn
five days only, an invited audience could see the artist’s to a vocabulary of functional forms (beds, chairs, play-
Slides of a Changing Painting (1982–1983). The work pens, drains, urinals, doors, conduits) that, in his hands,
was a documentation of a constantly morphing paint- take on grave emotional beauty. Each of his sculptures,
ing on board that Gober photographed in his studio. in its own way, is a portrait of an emotion or a human
“I had this little board on a table, about 11-by-14 inches, condition, whether it be the isolation of childhood or the
on which I painted on and off for a year. I had my cam- seductive power of the reimagined fact.
era and lights mounted over it. I would paint, take a In 1992, at the Dia Art Foundation in New York,
slide, scrape the paint off, add more paint, take a slide. Gober staged the most intricate of an ongoing series of
I took thousands of slides over the course of a year and psychologically plotted installations that, in their physi-
then edited them down and showed them with a dis- cal scope and metaphoric sweep, truly fall under the
solve—basically a memoir of a painting.”1 As one slide rubric of Gesamtkunstwerk. These installations exhibit
merges into the next, a haunting narrative of loss and a totality of vision as well as a growing thematic bra-
regeneration glides by, with the clicking of the slide pro- vado that snakes its way into many corners of the
jector playing the role of a relentless metronome. The human experience. It is the water (first seen in Slides of
images themselves linger most attentively on a human a Changing Painting) that turns Gober’s environments
torso that evolves from male to female to hermaphro- into a drowned world where redemption is always a
dite. The torso becomes a room, is penetrated by a con- whispered promise, but often heard in a cautionary
duit, disappears into a thicket of vines, splits to reveal a voice. In the Dia installation, the sinks—this time fully
waterfall. Seasons pass from one to the next and every- plumbed and gushing with water—gave voice to the
where there is water—gushing, pouring, pooling. As promise. Talking of the exhibition, Gober said: “I
remarkable as the images themselves is the fact that wanted the feeling of the show to be positive and
Slides of a Changing Painting has remained over the mature. And I think I felt that making the sink functional
succeeding years the abundant source for much of wasn’t only an internal imperative of expressing who I
Gober’s ensuing sculpture. Back in 1984, only a handful am, but maybe it was also a response to so much of the
of people saw Slides of a Changing Painting, and there interpretation that had to do with the nonfunctioning
were no reviews. To this day, it has been seen only sink and the epidemic and myself as a gay man. I think
rarely; but for those who have experienced the piece, I felt a need to turn that around and to not have a gay
it becomes clear that it is the Rosetta stone for Gober’s artist represented as a nonfunctioning utilitarian object,
sculpture. Talking about the work, the artist comments: but one functioning beautifully, almost in excess.”3
“I knew in the beginning what the end form would be, After the Dia exhibition, Gober continued to make
that they [the paintings] would be slides. I always individual objects as he had before, but the anxiety of
thought of myself as a painter, but I could never make their presence did not diminish. Sculptures of a lounge
paintings. I was never interested in the physical object- chair and enormous tissue and lard boxes gutted by
ness of a painting, but the process and imagery really bronze conduit pipes, a Brobdingnagian stick of butter
interested me. It was the heyday of neo-expressionism, occupying an equivalently extravagant piece of wax
and I had a kind of allergic reaction to it. So, in a way, paper that measures out gigantic tablespoons all gen-
my intuitive response to that gluttonous situation was erated strange adventures in scale and psychological
to make a surfeit of paintings that didn’t really exist.”2 perception. Male/female torsos, which earlier in the
The following year, Gober opened an exhibition decade were hermaphroditic wax torsos tossed into
devoted exclusively to his sculpture and everything right-angled corners, began turning up in laundry bas-
changed. The dominant sculptural form in the show kets and milk crates—not as horrific back-alley discov-
was a sink—kitchen sink, laundry sink, bathroom sink. eries, but as strangely commodified inevitables. A
Each was instantly recognizable, yet completely alien. standard child’s nursery-school chair placed over a
The sculptures’ materiality was built up from a wooden drain accommodates a larger-than-life box of tissues to
armature covered in wire lath, then plastered and create a portrait of the psychologically freighted all-
painted. The semigloss enamel paint covering the sinks American child sitting on a world of repressed anxiety.
did not pretend to mimic porcelain any more than the As the last century drew to a close, Gober created
plasterwork imitated a flawless, machined surface. another work of shattering power (now on permanent

234 ROBERT GOBER


display at the Schaulager in Basel, Switzerland). The
installation was created for Los Angeles’ Museum of
Contemporary Art and resolves itself around a larger-
than-life-size concrete statue of the Virgin Mary stand-
ing atop a sewer drain. Below the drain lies a limpid
pool of water filled with sea plants and outsize coins all
inscribed with Gober’s birth year. The Madonna’s
womb is penetrated by a large bronze conduit. Behind
her, in the distance (visible through the conduit), is a
domestically scaled wooden staircase down which tor-
rents of water rush, producing a sound that, if experi-
enced in one’s home, would spell disaster. At the bottom
of the steps, the water gathers and then gushes into the
blackness of a storm drain. Off to the right and left of the
Madonna are two silk-lined suitcases lying open on the
floor. Their interiors are also drains in which one can
glimpse sparkling tidal pools and the legs of a man
holding a diapered infant over the water. The work is
apocalyptic in its complex merger of rapture and seren-
ity. In that complexity lies the profound seductiveness of
Gober’s art, which looks unblinkingly at life as a grand,
occasionally grinding reality that is, by turns, harrow-
ingly ordinary and breathtakingly transcendent.

R.F.

Notes
1. Quoted in Richard Flood, Robert Gober: Sculpture + Drawing,
exh. cat. (Minneapolis: Walker Art Center, 1999), 127.
2. Ibid.
3. Ibid., 21.

Robert Gober Selections from Slides of a Changing Painting 1982–1983


89 color transparencies for projection 26 x 39 in. (66 x 99.1 cm) projected
T. B. Walker Acquisition Fund, 1992 1992.152 ©Robert Gober

ROBERT GOBER 235


Robert Gober The Subconscious Sink 1985 plaster, wood, steel, wire, lath, paint 90 x 83 5/8 x 25 1/2 in. (228.6 x 212.4 x 64.8 cm) Clinton and Della Walker
Acquisition Fund and Jerome Foundation Purchase Fund for Emerging Artists, 1985 1985.396 ©Robert Gober

236 ROBERT GOBER


Robert Gober Untitled 1982 plaster over matrix wire lath 65 1/2 x 34 3/4 x 40 in. (166.4 x 88.3 x 101.6 cm) Gift of Jennifer Bartlett, 1994 1994.224
©Robert Gober

ROBERT GOBER 237


Robert Gober Untitled Door and Door Frame 1987–1988 wood, enamel paint, door door: 84 x 31 3/4 x 1 1/2 in. (213.4 x 80.7 x 3.8 cm); door frame: 90 x 43 1/4 x
8 in. (228.6 x 109.9 x 20.3 cm) Gift of the John and Mary Pappajohn Art Foundation, 2004 2004.68 ©Robert Gober

238 ROBERT GOBER


On an untitled sculpture by Robert Gober
Robert Gober is a poet of the uncanny, the fragmented, and the inexplicable. The objects he creates are at once
down-to-earth and fantastic, appealing to our knowledge of the everyday—ordinary bodies, utensils, house-
wares—at the same time as they reach down to perturb the deepest levels of the unconscious.
Untitled (1999), a work of modest dimensions made of cast plastic, beeswax, hair, pigment, and cedar, is a
perfect example of Gober’s achievement. A torso lies in an ordinary milk crate—a torso that is a bit wrinkled and
rumpled, rather like the clothes one would expect to find in a laundry basket. Already the viewer is unsettled,
distressed. What is a realistic human torso doing in a milk crate? Memories of Jeffrey Dahmer flash through our
heads, shades of perversity and violence. Yet the piece as a whole exudes tranquility, a benign peacefulness.
The torso lies there like a baby in its bed, protected and enclosed by its latticework cradle.
But then, what a torso! For the body in question is half female and half male, the halves joined fluently, without
borders or separation, in the middle. Manly hair covers the chest and belly of one side; a soft, hairless breast and
an obtrusive pink nipple mark the other. On one level, one might say that this torso is a paradigm of Platonic per-
fection, the human body at its origins as Aristophanes described it in Plato’s Symposium, before the two halves of
humanity were cut apart and thereby rendered imperfect. “The original human nature was . . . man, woman, and
the union of the two having a name corresponding to this double nature, which once had a real existence, but
is now lost, and the word ‘androgynous’ is only preserved as a term of reproach.” Our lives are spent in search of
that lost totality, and it is this desire and pursuit of the whole that is called love. From this point of view, Gober’s
Untitled may be understood as the paradigmatic image of a lost felicity.
On the other hand, this torso as a visible object suggests a perverse joining of irreconcilable opposites, a freak
of nature. The hermaphrodite strikes us as an appalling anomaly, a never-to-be-resolved contradiction. Having it
all, in gender terms, can only be disturbing, and the absence of head, arms, and legs in the context of convincing
realism—body hair, nipple, delicately nuanced flesh—can only have sinister implications.
Gober’s torso, though, must mean something different to male and female spectators. Although it literalizes
androgyny, it is yet not quite a hermaphrodite, which needs both male and female sex organs. To the male specta-
tor, this torso must be unsettling: his manly, hairy chest has sprouted a perky breast! For the female, it has over-
tones of loss, associated with the omnipresent specter of breast cancer, mastectomy, masculinization. For men and
women alike, of course, it presents a disconcerting ambiguity; yet for me, a distinct seductiveness as well. Both at
once! The baglike integument, softening and derealizing the body form, suggests perhaps a kind of gift, a present
of erotic takeout, as it were. Sometimes I think I am a little in love with Gober’s torso. It’s not the first time someone
fell in love with a statue, after all; think of Pygmalion and Galatea, brought to life by Venus. I don’t want to bring
Gober’s torso to life, however, because it seems to me that, in its irreconcilable doubleness, it is already pregnant
with a poignant vivacity. Alive, it would merely be a monster.

Linda Nochlin

Robert Gober Untitled 1999 cast plastic, beeswax, hair,


pigment, cedar 12 1/2 x 18 3/4 x 13 in. (31.8 x 47.6 x 33 cm)
T. B. Walker Acquisition Fund, 1999 1999.38 ©Robert Gober

ROBERT GOBER 239


Bits & Pieces Put Together to Present a Semblance
of a Whole: Walker Art Center Collections
Joan Rothfuss and Elizabeth Carpenter

Bits & Pieces Put Together to Present a Semblance Every reasonable attempt has been made to identify
of a Whole: Walker Art Center Collections is published owners of copyright. Errors or omissions will be
on the occasion of the opening of the newly expanded corrected in subsequent editions.
Walker Art Center, April 2005.
Wayne Koestenbaum, “Jackie and Repetition,” from
Major support for Walker Art Center programs is Jackie Under My Skin: Interpreting an Icon (New York:
provided by the Minnesota State Arts Board through Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1995), © by permission of
an appropriation by the Minnesota State Legislature, the author.
The Wallace Foundation, the Doris Duke Charitable
Foundation through the Doris Duke Fund for Jazz Publications Manager
and Dance and the Doris Duke Performing Arts Lisa Middag
Endowment Fund, The Bush Foundation, Target, Editors
General Mills Foundation, Best Buy Co., Inc., The Pamela Johnson, Kathleen McLean
McKnight Foundation, Coldwell Banker Burnet, Designers
the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the Andrew Blauvelt, Chad Kloepfer
National Endowment for the Arts, American Express Production Specialist
Philanthropic Program, The Regis Foundation, The Greg Beckel
Cargill Foundation, 3M, Star Tribune Foundation,
U.S. Bank, The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, and Printed and bound in Belgium by Die Keure.
the members of the Walker Art Center.
Cover art
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lawrence Weiner

Walker Art Center


Bits & pieces put together to present a semblance of a
whole : Walker Art
Center collections.-- 1st ed.
p. cm.
Includes index.
ISBN 0-935640-78-9 (hardcover : alk. paper)
1. Walker Art Center--Catalogs. 2.
Arts--Minnesota--Minneapolis--Catalogs. 3. Walker Art
Center--History. I.
Title: Bits and pieces put together to present a
semblance of a whole. II.
Title: Walker Art Center collections. III. Title.
N583.A53 2005
709’.04’0074776579--dc22
2004031088

First Edition
© 2005 Walker Art Center
All rights reserved under pan-American copyright con-
ventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or
utilized in any form or by any means—electronic or me-
chanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any
information storage-and-retrieval system—without per-
mission in writing from the Walker Art Center. Inquiries
should be addressed to: Publications Manager, Walker
Art Center, 1750 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55403.

Available through D.A.P./Distributed Art Publishers


155 Sixth Avenue, New York, NY 10013

WALKER ART CENTER COLLECTIONS

You might also like