The St. Petersburg paradox shows that expected value alone does not determine a rational decision. While a fair coin-tossing game offers infinite expected value, most people would not pay a large finite sum to play. Decision theory must account for attitudes to risk and the declining marginal utility of money to explain rational choices under uncertainty.
The St. Petersburg paradox shows that expected value alone does not determine a rational decision. While a fair coin-tossing game offers infinite expected value, most people would not pay a large finite sum to play. Decision theory must account for attitudes to risk and the declining marginal utility of money to explain rational choices under uncertainty.
The St. Petersburg paradox shows that expected value alone does not determine a rational decision. While a fair coin-tossing game offers infinite expected value, most people would not pay a large finite sum to play. Decision theory must account for attitudes to risk and the declining marginal utility of money to explain rational choices under uncertainty.