Hi, HNLU Logout

BOOKMARKS TOP STORIES NEWS UPDATES COLUMNS INTERVIEWS


FOREIGN/INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT RTI KNOW THE LAW VIDEOS SPONSORED

ROUND UPS

JOB UPDATES BOOK REVIEWS EVENTS CORNER LAWYERS & LAW FIRMS CARTOONS SC JUDGMENTS लाइव लॉ हिं


Home / Top Stories / Section 482 CrPC :...

TOP STORIES

Section 482 CrPC : Supreme Court

Judgments On High Courts' Power [2021]
LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 30 Dec 2021 5:49 PM

SHARE THIS -
Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure saves the inherent powers of High

Courts. It provides that nothing in the Code shall be deemed to limit or affect the

inherent powers of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give

effect to any order under the Code, or to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or

otherwise to secure the ends of justice.

Invoking such powers, the High Court can quash FIR or criminal proceedings arising

out of it, to secure ends of justice or if it finds that the same is an abuse of process of

court. The following are the judgments delivered by the Supreme Court in 2021 which

deals with the scope of the 'inherent' power of High Courts.

Also Read - All Supreme Court 2021 Digests & Round-Up Reports In One Place

Blanket Order Of Protection From Arrest Cannot Be Passed By High Court While

Dismissing A Petition U/s 482 CrPC: Supreme Court

[Case: Ravuri Krishna Murthy v. State of Telangana; Citation: LL 2021 SC 150]

A Bench comprising of Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah observed that a

blanket order of protection from arrest cannot be passed by the High Court while

dismissing a petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking

quashing of FIR. The issue raised in this appeal was whether the High Court of Andhra

Pradesh was justified in passing a blanket direction restraining the police from

arresting the accused while at the same time having come to the conclusion that

there was no merit in the petition for quashing under Section 482.

Also Read - Why Bishop Franco Mulakkal's Acquittal In Nun Rape Case Is Flawed?

Mere Existence Of Civil Remedies Not A Ground To Quash Criminal Proceedings:

Reiterates Supreme court

[Case: Priti Saraf v. State Of NCT Of Delhi; Citation: LL 2021 SC 154]

A bench comprising of Justices Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi observed that

existence of civil remedies by itself is not a ground to quash criminal proceedings. It

observed that simply because there is a remedy provided for breach of contract or

arbitral proceedings initiated at the instance of the complainant, that does not by itself

clothe the court to come to a conclusion that civil remedy is the only remedy, and the

initiation of criminal proceedings, in any manner, will be an abuse of the process of the

court for exercising inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC for

quashing such proceedings.

Also Read - NCDRC Issues Directions For Computation Of Limitation Period After

Supreme Court Restores Limitation Extension

The bench said that to exercise powers under Section 482 CrPC, the complaint in its

entirety shall have to be examined on the basis of the allegation made in the
complaint/FIR/charge-sheet and the High Court at that stage was not under an

obligation to go into the matter or examine its correctness.

High Courts Shall Not Pass Order Of 'Not To Arrest' Or 'No Coercive Steps' While

Dismissing/Disposing Petition U/s 482 CrPC: Supreme Court

Also Read - Can High Court Order Release Of Vehicle Seized By Police Authorities

Under Rajasthan Police Act? Supreme Court To Consider

[Case: M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra; Citation: LL

2021 SC 211]

A bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, MR Shah and Sanjiv Khanna held that

a High Court, while dismissing/disposing of the quashing petition under Section 482

CrPC and/or under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, shall not pass order of not

to arrest and/or "no coercive steps" either during the investigation or till the

investigation is completed and/or till the final report/chargesheet is filed under

Section 173 CrPC.

It observed that when the investigation is in progress and the facts are hazy and the

entire evidence/material is not before the High Court, the High Court should restrain

itself from passing the interim order of not to arrest or "no coercive steps to be

adopted" and the accused should be relegated to apply for anticipatory bail under

Section 438 CrPC before the competent court.

Power Under Section 482 CrPC Cannot Be Used To Undermine Statutory Dictate

Under Section 14, 17 IBC: Supreme Court

[Case: Case: Sandeep Khaitan, Resolution Professional For National Plywood

Industries Ltd. v. JSVM Plywood Industries Ltd.; Citation: LL 2021 SC 228]

The power under Section 482 of CrPC cannot be used to overlook the undermining of

a statutory dictate, a Bench comprising of Justices UU Lalit and KM Joseph observed.

In this case, the High Court allowed an interlocutory application filed by a Company

claiming to be an operational creditor to allow it to operate its bank account

maintained with the ICICI Bank and to unfreeze the bank account of its creditors over

which the lien has been created and the accounts frozen pursuant to the lodging of an

FIR by the Interim Resolution Professional. "We have to also in this context bear in

mind that the High Court appears to have, in passing the impugned order, which is an

interim order for that matter, overlooked the salutary limits on its power under Section

482. The power under Section 482 may not be available to the Court to countenance

the breach of a statuary provision. The words 'to secure the ends of justice' in Section
482 cannot mean to overlook the undermining of a statutory dictate, which in this

case is the provisions of Section 14, and Section 17 of the IBC", the bench observed.

Dismissal Of An Earlier Section 482 CPC Petition Does Not Bar Filing Of Subsequent

Petition, If Facts So Justify

[Case: Vinod Kumar IAS v. Union of India; Citation: LL 2021 SC 281]

Dismissal of an earlier Section 482 CrPC petition does not bar filing of subsequent

petition under Section 482, in case the facts so justify, the Supreme Court reiterated

while dismissing a writ petition filed by an IAS Officer. The Bench comprising Justice

UU Lalit and Justices Indira Banerjee and Ajay Rastogi observed that it sees no reason

to entertain the petition under Article 32. "The petitioner, if so advised, can always file
appropriate applications under the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of

the individual criminal cases or complaints", the bench further opined.

Section 482 CrPC: Interim Protection Order Can Be Passed In Exceptional Cases

Giving Brief Reasons

[Case: A P Mahesh Cooperative Urban Bank Shareholders Welfare Association v.

Ramesh Kumar Bung; Citation: LL 2021 SC 309]

The Supreme Court observed that the High Courts can pass interim protection order in

Section 482 CrPC petitions in exceptional cases by giving brief reasons. What is

frowned upon in Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra is the

tendency of the courts to pass blanket, cryptic, laconic, nonspeaking orders reading

"no coercive steps shall be adopted", the bench comprising Justices Indira Banerjee

and V. Ramasubramanian said.

Quashing Of FIR: Detailed Enquiry On Merits Not Warranted U/s 482 CrPC

[Case: State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kunwar Singh; Citation: LL 2021 SC 344]

The Supreme Court has reiterated that a detailed enquiry into the merits of the

allegations is not warranted while exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of the

Criminal Procedure Code. The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR

Shah observed that while exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Criminal

Procedure Code, the High Court ought not to be scrutinizing the material in the

manner in which the trial court would do in the course of the criminal trial after

evidence is adduced.

Improper To Quash FIR U/s 482 CrPC When There Are Serious Triable Allegations In

Complaint, Reiterates Supreme Court

[Case: Kaptan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh; Citation: LL 2021 SC 379]

The Supreme Court has observed that it is improper to quash criminal proceedings

under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code when there are serious triable

allegations in the complaint. Appreciation of evidence is not permissible at the stage

of quashing of proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC, the Bench

of Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah reiterated while setting aside a High Court

judgment.

Section 482 CrPC: High Court Not Required To Appreciate Evidence To Find Out

Whether Accused Is Likely To Be Convicted Or Not

[Case: Saranya v. Bharati; Citation: LL 2021 SC 402]

The Supreme Court reiterated that, at Section 482 CrPC stage, a High Court is not

required to appreciate the evidence to find out whether the accused is likely to be

convicted or not. A Bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah

observed, "The High Court has entered into the appreciation of the evidence and

considered whether on the basis of the evidence, the accused is likely to be convicted

or not, which as such is not permissible at all at this stage while considering the

application under Section 482 Cr.P.C."

Section 482 CrPC: High Court Not Required To Appreciate Evidence To Find Out

Whether Accused Is Likely To Be Convicted Or Not

[Case: Saranya v. Bharati; Citation: LL 2021 SC 402]

The Supreme Court reiterated that, at Section 482 CrPC stage, a High Court is not

required to appreciate the evidence to find out whether the accused is likely to be

convicted or not. A Bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah

observed, "The High Court has entered into the appreciation of the evidence and

considered whether on the basis of the evidence, the accused is likely to be convicted
or not, which as such is not permissible at all at this stage while considering the

application under Section 482 Cr.P.C."

Non Compoundable' Criminal Cases Of Predominantly Private Nature Can Be

Quashed U/s 482 CrPC Even If Compromise Is Reached After Conviction

[Case: Ramgopal v. State of Madhya Pradesh; Citation: LL 2021 SC 516]

The Supreme Court observed that a High Court can quash criminal proceedings in

exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-

compoundable and the compromise is reached after conviction. The bench

comprising CJI NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant added that criminal proceedings

involving non-­heinous offences or where the offences are predominantly of a private

nature, can be quashed irrespective of the fact that trial has already been concluded

or appeal stands dismissed against conviction.

Civil Dispute Given Colour Of Criminal Offence: Supreme Court Says Criminal

Proceedings Should Not Become Weapons Of Harassment

[Case: Randheer Singh v. State of UP; Citation: LL 2021 SC 574]

Dispute of a civil nature has been given colour of criminal offence, the Supreme Court

has observed in a judgment while it quashed criminal proceedings initiated against a

property purchaser. The bench of Justices Indira Banerjee and JK Maheshwari

observed that while considering a petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings,

the High Court should examine whether a complaint discloses criminal offence or not

depends on the nature of the allegation and whether the essential ingredients of a

criminal offence are present or not. Section 482 is designed to achieve the purpose of

ensuring that criminal proceedings are not permitted to generate into weapons of

harassment, the court reiterated. In this case, an FIR was lodged against the power of

attorney of the complainant and the purchaser of the property. Examining the FIR, the
court observed that the criminal proceedings are being taken recourse to as a weapon

of harassment against the purchaser.

Offences Under Special Statutes Including SC/ST Act Can Also Be Quashed By

Exercising Powers U/S 482 CrPC/ Article 142

[Case: Ramawatar v. State of Madhya Pradesh; Citation: LL 2021 SC 589]

The Supreme Court observed that criminal proceedings arising out of Scheduled

Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989 can be quashed

invoking powers under Article 142 of Constitution or Section 482 of Criminal

Procedure Code. "The mere fact that the offence is covered under a 'special statute'

would not refrain this Court or the High Court, from exercising their respective powers

under Article 142 of the Constitution or Section 482 CrPC", a three judges bench

comprising CJI NV Ramana, Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli observed. The Bench

opined, "where it appears to the Court that the offence in question, although covered

under the SC/ST Act, is primarily private or civil in nature, or where the alleged offence

has not been committed on account of the caste of the victim, or where the

continuation of the legal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, the

Court can exercise its powers to quash the proceedings."

Criminal Cases Having Overwhelmingly & Predominatingly A Civil Flavour Stands On

Different Footing For Purpose Of Quashing

[Case: Jaswant Singh v. State of Punjab; Citation: LL 2021 SC 623]

The allegations made in the FIR had an overwhelmingly and predominatingly a civil

flavour, the Supreme Court remarked while quashing a criminal proceeding. The bench

of Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath observed that inherent powers

should be exercised in a given and deserving case where the Court is satisfied that

exercise of such power would either prevent abuse of such power or such exercise
would result in securing the ends of justice. In this case, the complainant alleged that

he had paid money to the accused to get employment for his son abroad. That they

did not honour their promise and harassed his son and did not arrange for a job as per

their promise. The High Court dismissed the petition filed by the accused and declined

to quash the proceedings on the ground that a perusal of the FIR goes to show that

the name of the accused is specifically mentioned in the FIR and criminal acts have

been attributed to him. "In our view, the present one is amongst those fittest cases

where the High Court ought to have exercised its powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

and ought to have secured the ends of justice by closing the proceedings against the

appellants", the Apex Court noted.

High Court Cannot Quash Criminal Proceedings U/Sec 482 CrPC Relying On 'Draft

Charge Sheet' Which Is Yet To Be Filed Before Magistrate

[Case: Jitul Jentilal Kotecha v. State of Gujarat; Citation: LL 2021 SC 642]

A High Court cannot place reliance on a "draft charge-sheet" which is yet to be placed

before the Magistrate to quash the criminal proceedings under Section 482 of

Criminal Procedure, the Supreme Court has observed. The bench comprising Justices

DY Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna observed that a High Court can neither direct an

investigating agency to submit the investigation report before it nor can it quash a

criminal proceeding under Section 482 relying on such a report when the report has

not been submitted to the Magistrate.

Reliability Or Genuineness Of Allegations Made In FIR/Complaint Cannot Be Gone

Into While Exercising Jurisdiction U/Sec 482 CrPC: Supreme Court

[Case: State of Odisha v. Pratima Mohanty; Citation: LL 2021 SC 730]

The Supreme Court observed that while exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of

Criminal Procedure Code, a High court cannot embark upon any enquiry as to the
reliability or genuineness of allegations made in the FIR/complaint. The powers under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. is very wide, but conferment of wide power requires the court to be

more cautious, the bench comprising Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna said.

Section 482 CrPC - High Court Can't Pass Adverse Orders Or Observations Against

Third Party Who Is Not Before It: Supreme Court

[Case: Anu Kumar v. State (UT Administration) & Anr; Citation: LL 2021 SC 757]

The Supreme Court observed that the High Court in a petition for quashing filed by the

accused u/s 482 CrPC cannot issue directions for proceeding against a third party

who was neither before the Court and nor was given any opportunity before passing

the order. A bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and CT Ravikumar examine whether the

High Court in a petition for quashing filed by the accused u/s 482 CrPC could issue

directions to proceed against a third party who was neither before the Court and nor

was given any opportunity before passing the order and also make observations.

TAGS SECTION 482 CRPC  SUPREME COURT 

loading....

SIMILAR POSTS + VIEW MORE

All Supreme Court 2021
Digests & Round-Up
Reports In One Place
2 Jan 2022 5:15 PM
Why Bishop Franco
Mulakkal's Acquittal In
Nun Rape Case Is
Flawed?
16 Jan 2022 11:04 AM
NCDRC Issues Directions For
Computation Of Limitation
Period After Supreme Court
Restores Limitation Extension
16 Jan 2022 10:08 AM

Hate Speeches : Army Bishop Franco Mulakkal

Veterans Move Supreme Case : Why Court Found
Can High Court Order Release Of
Court Seeking SIT Probe Nun's Testimony
Vehicle Seized By Police
On Dharam Sansads Unreliable?
Authorities Under Rajasthan
Police Act? Supreme Court To
Consider
15 Jan 2022 7:25 PM 15 Jan 2022 6:09 PM 15 Jan 2022 5:29 PM

Hate Speech : Supreme

Court Petitioner Writes
To Authorities Against
Future Dharam Sansad
Meets
15 Jan 2022 2:47 PM
'Personal Liberty' : Supreme
Court Allows Brother-in-
Law Accused In Section
498A IPC Case To Travel
Abroad
15 Jan 2022 2:26 PM
Lawyer Moves Supreme
Court Challenging Bombay
High Court Circular Reducing
Working Hours To 3 Due To
COVID
15 Jan 2022 1:56 PM
Dosage Of Hate Speech Is
Marital Rape - Plea Before AG Seeks
Increasing With Law's
'Classification On Basis Of Contempt Action Against Yati
Delay; Courts Can't Afford
Marriage Unreasonable' : Narsinghanand Over Remarks
To Look On
Amicus Curiae Tells Delhi Against Supreme Court
HC
15 Jan 2022 1:45 PM 14 Jan 2022 8:10 PM 14 Jan 2022 5:26 PM

+ MORE
WEBINARS

FULL VIDEO - Justice VR Krishna Iyer Memorial Lecture By Justice Nageswara Rao

+ MORE
LAW FIRMS
Dua Associates Represents Hughes Communications (HCIPL) In JV Formation With
BhartiAirtel Limited

+ MORE
LATEST NEWS

1 Bombay High Court Allows Age-Barred Law Graduate To Participate In Judges

Selection As Recruitments Got Stalled Due To COVID

2 Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 10 To January 16, 2022

3 Tendering Pardon To An Accomplice In A Case Triable By A Special Court Under

The Prevention Of Corruption Act, 1988

4 Alapan Bandyopadhyay Moves Delhi High Court Challenging Order Of Central

Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench

5 Why Bishop Franco Mulakkal's Acquittal In Nun Rape Case Is Flawed?

COVID-Supreme Court Order Suspending Limitation Is Applicable For Refund

6 Under GST Act – Bombay High Court

7 NCDRC Issues Directions For Computation Of Limitation Period After Supreme

Court Restores Limitation Extension

8 Kerala High Court Weekly Roundup [January 10 to January 15, 2022]

लाइव लॉ हिंदी + MORE

सुप्रीम कोर्ट वीकली राउंड अप : सुप्रीम कोर्ट के कु छ खास ऑर्डर/जजमेंट पर एक नज़र

बॉम्बे हाईकोर्ट COVID के कारण कामकाज के घंटे घटाए, सर्कु लर के खिलाफ वकील ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट का
रुख किया

सुप्रीम कोर्ट के खिलाफ टिप्‍पणी के मामले में यति नरसिंहानंद के खिलाफ अवमानना कार्र वाई की मांग,
एटॉर्नी जनरल को पत्र
पोक्सो : सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने छात्रा के यौन उत्पीड़न के आरोपी शिक्षक की हाईकोर्ट के फै सले को चुनौती देने
वाली याचिका पर नोटिस जारी किया

अगर सह-आरोपियों बरी हो गए हैं, 'गैरकानूनी रूप से जमा भीड़ के सदस्यों की संख्या 5 से कम हुई,
मामले में अज्ञात आरोपी नहीं है तो आईपीसी की धारा 149 की मदद से दोषसिद्धि टिकाऊ नहीं : सुप्रीम
कोर्ट
 + MORE
INTERNATIONAL

1 Judicial Commission Of Pakistan Recommends Elevation Of Justice Ayesha

Malik As First Female Judge Of Supreme Court

2 Myanmar Court Sentences Ousted Leader Aung San Suu Kyi To 4 Years Jail

3 Unwritten Constitutional Principles Like Democracy Is Part Of Constitution; But

Cannot Be Used As Bases For Invalidating Legislation: Canada Supreme Court

4 Children Born To Parents Outside Marital Bond Are Blameless; Differential

Treatment Towards Them Unconstitutional: South Africa Constitutional Court

+ MORE
ENVIRONMENT

1 Total Ban On Legal Mining Will Give Rise To Illegal Mining & Cause Huge Loss
To Public Exchequer: Supreme Court Modifies NGT Directives On Sand Mining

2 Dolomite Mining In Uttarakhand: NGT Orders ₹2 Cr Interim Compensation For

Environment Damage, Spreading Muck Beyond Allotted Area

3 Pollution In Doodh Ganga & Mamath Kull Of Jammu & Kashmir; NGT
Constitutes Five Member Committee To Ascertain Water Quality

4 TN Approaches Supreme Court To Restrain Karnataka From Proceeding With

The Proposed Construction Of Mekedatu Reservoir

JOB UPDATES

1. Legal cum Probation Officer Vacancy At District Child Protection Society, Kallakurichi,
Tamil Nadu

2. Empanelment Of Advocates (Chennai and Puducherry) Vacancy At Employees Provident

Fund Organization (EPFO)
3. Legal Researcher Vacancy At High Court Of Rajasthan, Jodhpur

4. Odisha Judicial Service Examination, 2021

5. Young Professional (Legal) Vacancy At Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited

+ VIEW MORE

JUST ENTER YOUR EMAIL FOR THE

LIVELAW DAILY NEWS BRIEFING BY
EMAIL ALL THE DAY'S HEADLINES AND
HIGHLIGHTS FROM LIVELAW, DIRECT
TO YOU EVERY MORNING

NEWSLETTERS
DIRECTLY IN YOUR MAILBOX

Enter Your Email

Submit
 TOP STORIES KNOW THE LAW

NEWS UPDATE LAW FIRMS

COLUMNS JOB UPDATES

INTERVIEWS BOOK REVIEWS

INTERNATIONAL EVENTS CORNER

RTI UPDATES COVER STORY

EDITOR'S PICK PLACEMENTS

LAW SCHOOL CORNER SCHOLARSHIPS

ARTICLES SEMINARS

CALL FOR PAPERS ENVIRONMENT

COMPETITIONS BOOK REVIEWS

INTERNSHIPS

© All Rights Reserved @LiveLaw

Powered By Hocalwire

Who We Are Careers Advertise With Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms And Conditions



X
Live Law subscriptions starting ₹ 899 +GST

Subscribe to Live Law now and get unlimited access.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Already have an account? Sign In