! 99-20-613-613 UPSC-NOTES
"  $ %
HOME UPSC ! ABOUT US ! PRELIMS !
ONLYIAS VIDEOS
ON OPEN FOR ONLYIAS CTR MODEL OFFLINE CLASSES IN DELHI , SEATS ARE LIMITED !  CALL AT 9920613613
Popular Search
INDIAN POLITY
GOVERNANCE
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
BILATERAL RELATIONS WITH DEVELOPED
COUNTRIES
India-Australia Bilateral Relations
India-Canada Bilateral Relations
India-France Bilateral Relations
India-Germany Bilateral Relations
India-Italy Bilateral Relations
India-Israel Bilateral Relations
India-Japan Bilateral Relations
India-Russia Bilateral Relations
India-United Kingdom Bilateral Relations
India-US Bilateral Relations
REGIONAL AND GLOBAL GROUP
ASIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION (APEC)
ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATION
(ASEAN)
BRICS
BAY OF BENGAL INITIATIVE FOR MULTI-
SECTORAL TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC
COOPERATION (BIMSTEC)
GROUP OF 8/GROUP 7
GROUP OF 20
GROUP OF 4
INDIAN OCEAN RIM ASSOCIATION (IORA)
SAARC & SAFTA
SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION (SCO)
NON ALIGNMENT MOVEMENT (NAM)
ARCTIC COUNCIL
ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURAL INVESTMENT BANK
(AIIB)
CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN
ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND
FLORA) CITES
UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON
CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC)
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL
DIVERSITY (UNCBD)
NEW DEVELOPMENT BANK
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)
South Asia Co-operative Environment Programme
(SACEP)
INDIA-BRAZIL-SOUTH AFRICA (IBSA)
GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL (GCC)
EUROPEAN UNION
COMMONWEALTH OF NATIONS
International Organizations
United Nations
India and UNSC Reform
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Bretton Wood Conference
World Trade Organisation (WTO)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD)
Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC)
International Court of Justice
International Criminal Court (ICC)
INTERPOL
Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
International Union for Conservation of Nature and
Natural Resources (IUCN)
International Labour Organisation (ILO)
World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)
International Solar Alliance (ISA)
World Bank
AGREEMENTS
Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)
Wassenaar Arrangement
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG)
Hague Code of Conduct (HCoC)
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS)
About us
Only IAS is one of the most loved and
trusted platforms of aspirants for
UPSC CSE preparation. Based on the
struggles and needs of our students,
we have been in constant
evolutionary process to revolutionise
the learning and growth through
enriched content compilation, mentor
support, interactive classes and most
importantly, a constant companion in
this uncertain and unpredictable
journey.
' 3rd floor, 53/1, Bada Bazar Rd, Block
53n,near Popular Fruit Juice, Old Rajinder
Nagar, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, Delhi
110060
! 9920613613
" 9920613613
( Info@pwonlyias.com
) * "  $
Copyright © 2023 ONLYIAS NOTHING ELSE
BATCH LOGIN !
MAINS ! INTERVIEW ! TOPPERS ! COURSES ! CURRENT ! DAILY TASK ! DOWNLOADS ! BLOGS
Announcement &
Search.. All Categories SEARCH
ncert geography udaan current a indian
75 Home upscnotes General Studies – 2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS World Trade Organisation (WTO)
19 WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION (WTO)
61
! Table of Contents "
1 World Trade Organisation (WTO)
World Trade Organisation (WTO)
Basics and Background:
WTO is an international organization set up in 1995 by replacing the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs
(GATT) under the Marrakesh Agreement.
It is the only global international organization dealing with the international Trade between nations.
Its HQ is located in Geneva, Switzerland.
Currently, WTO has 164 members and India is a founding member of WTO.
Currently, the head (Director-General) of WTO is Roberto Azevedo.
Objective:
To formulate and implement rules for international trade.
To provide a platform for negotiating and monitoring further trade liberalization.
To provide a platform for the settlement of disputes.
Providing assistance to the developing, least-developed and low-income countries in transition to adjust to WTO
rules and disciplines through technical cooperation and training.
To cooperate with the other major economic institutions (like UN, World Bank, IMF etc.) involved in global
economic management.
 
Principles of WTO:
Non-Discrimination
Most Favored Nation- All nations should be treated equally. No one country can grant any other member country
any special favour. For example, if one country lower tariff to one country then it has to be lowered to all other
member countries.
National Treatment- Same treatment to all products, either local or foreigners. Fair and equal treatment is given to
local as well as the products imported from other countries.
Reciprocity- Lowering of import duties and other trade barriers in return for similar concessions from another
country.
Predictability through Binding and enforceable commitments- To make the business environment stable and
predictable.
Transparency- The WTO members need to publish their trade regulations and to notify changes in trade policies
to the WTO.
Encouraging Development and Economic Reforms – All efforts are made by the WTO system to contribute to
development.
 
Important Trades Agreements of WTO:
Agreement on Agriculture (AoA),
Agreement on TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights),
Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS),
Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT),
Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMS),
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) etc.
Agreement on Agriculture (AoA):
It was negotiated during the Uruguay Round of the GATT and was concluded with the establishment of the WTO
in 1995.
Through AoA, WTO aims at reforming trade in agriculture with a fair and market-driven system.
The Agreement allows governments to support their rural economies, but only allowed those policies that cause
less trade “distortions”.
This agreement has fixed commitments from all member states on the following three agricultural supply chain
system:-
Improving Market access– This can be done by removing various trade barriers by the member states. By fixing
the tariffs and progressively promoting free trade among member states which will ultimately lead to an increase
in market access.
Domestic Subsidies- It basically motivates for the reduction in domestic subsidies that distorts free trade and fair
prices. This is based on the premise that not all subsidies distort trade to the same extent. Under this agreement,
Subsidies can be categorized into the following three boxes –
All those subsidies that do not distort trade or causes minimal distortion, comes under the
green box. E.g. All government services such as research, disease control, and infrastructure and
Green Box
food security. Also, all those subsidies are given to the farmers that directly do not affect
international trade also comes under the green box.
All kinds of domestic subsidies or support that can distort production and trade (with some
exceptions) fall into the Amber Box. The measures to support prices come under this box. The
Amber Box
exception is the provision that accepts subsidies upto 5% of agricultural production for developed
countries, 10% for developing countries.
All those Amber Box subsidies which tend to limit the production comes under Blue Box. This
Blue Box
can be increased without limit as long as subsidies are linked to production-limiting programs.
Export subsidies: All those subsidies that make the export of agricultural products cheaper are called export
subsidies. These are basically presumed to have trade-distorting effects. This agreement prohibits the use of export
subsidies by the member states for agriculture products.
MOST FAVOURED NATION
Most Favoured Nation is a treatment accorded to a trade partner to ensure non-discriminatory trade
between two countries vis-a-vis other trade partners.
The importance of MFN is shown in the fact that it is the first clause in the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade (GATT). Under WTO rules, a member country cannot discriminate between its trade partners. If a special
status is granted to a trade partner, it must be extended to all members of the WTO.
The Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Council):
It monitors implementationof the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the TRIPS
Agreement).
It provides a forum in which WTO Members can consult on intellectual property matters, and carries out the
specific responsibilities assigned to the Council in the TRIPS Agreement.
The TRIPS Agreement:
Sets the minimum standards of protectionfor copyrights and related rights, trademarks, geographical
indications (GIs), industrial designs, patents, integrated circuit layout designs, and undisclosed information.
Establishes minimum standards for the enforcementof intellectual property rights (IPRs) through civil actions
for infringement, actions at the border,
At least in regard to copyright piracyand trademark counterfeiting, in criminal actions.
Ministerial Conferences (MC):
MC Place Year Details
Ministers of finance, trade, foreign, and agriculture from more than 120
countries participated and the following issues were in discussion:
trade and investment
trade facilitation
MC1 Singapore 1996
transparency in government procurement
trade and competition
These are known as the Singapore Issues.
Discussions on the implementation of Singapore Issues.
Geneva, Further discussions for the next round related to Export subsidies,
MC2 1998
Switzerland market access, etc.
The Uruguay Round was discussed.
Further discussions on agricultural and services mandated at the
MC3 Seattle, USA 1999 last Ministerial.
The Ministerial Conference ended without a conclusion though.
MC4 Doha, Qatar 2001 The Doha Round was discussed.
Discussions on the progress of the Doha Development Agenda and
MC5 Cancún, Mexico 2003
other negotiations from the last Ministerial.
Discussions on aiming to conclude the Doha Round by 2006.
Adoption of the ‘Swiss Formula’ to cut down tariffs on non-
MC6 Hong Kong 2005 agricultural goods (NAMA) by both developed and developing
countries with different coefficients.
This meeting didn’t revolve around the Doha Round.
Ministers discussed various other ideas for further development.
Geneva,
MC7 2009 The theme of MC7 was ‘The WTO, the Multilateral Trading System
Switzerland
and the Current Global Economic Environment’
Discussions on multiple topics for least developed nations and
trade policy reviews.
WTO approved Montenegro, Russian Federation, and Samoa
Geneva,
MC8 2011 accessions.
Switzerland
Doha Round was discussed to make the mandate more effective,
operational, and precise.
The ‘Bali Package’ was adopted by the WTO that aimed at the following
points:
Boosting trade in the least developed countries (LDCs)
Higher food security provisions for developing countries
MC9 Bali, Indonesia 2013 Streamlining trade
The Bali Package is a selection of issues from the broader Doha
Round negotiations.
Yemen became a part of WTO.
Discussion on agriculture, cotton, and issues of LDCs.
MC10 Nairobi, Kenya 2015 The Nairobi Package was adopted by WTO that delivered
beneficial commitments to WTO’s poorest members.
Buenos Aires, Discussions on e-commerce duties, fisheries subsidies, and other
MC11 2017
Argentina commitments to negotiations in all sectors.
The WTO members have agreed that the organization’s Twelfth
Nur-Sultan,
MC12 2020 Ministerial Conference (MC12) will take place in June 2020 in
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan, which joined the WTO in 2015.
Doha Declaration:
The Doha Declaration is the November 2001 declaration that came out of the 4th Ministerial
Conference of the WTO, that took place in Doha, Qatar.
This declaration gives the mandate for negotiations on an array of topics including issues concerning the
implementation of the previous agreements.
This is called the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health.
There were disagreements between developed and developing countries.
The major bones of contention were agriculture, non-tariff trade barriers, industrial tariffs, services, and trade
remedies.
The Bali Ministerial Declaration was achieved in 2013 which is the first agreement under the Doha Round, and
also the first unanimous agreement under WTO.
USA and India at WTO:
India has won a major trade dispute against the US at the World Trade Organization (WTO),with a dispute
settlement panel.
India had claimed that the Domestic Content Requirements and subsidiesinstituted by the governments of the
eight states of the US in the energy sector violated several provisions of the Trade-Related Investment Measures
(TRIMs) Agreement and Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement.
India brought this dispute to the WTO in 2016.
The same year, the US had won a case at WTO against India’s solar power policies, claiming that policies had
resulted in a 90% reduction of U.S. solar exports to India.
The panel pronounced that subsidies and mandatory local content requirements instituted by eight American
states (Washington, California, Montana, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Michigan, Delaware and Minnesota)
breached global trade rules.
The panel found that all the US state measures at issue are inconsistent with GATT 1994 (Article III-National
Treatment)because they provide an advantage for the use of domestic products, which amounts to less
favourable treatment for similar imported products.
WTO’s Appellate Body
The Appellate Body, set up in 1995, is a standing committee of seven membersthat presides over appeals against
judgments passed in trade-related disputes brought by WTO members.
Countries involved in a dispute over measures purported to break a WTO agreement or obligation can approach
the Appellate Body if they feel the report of the panel set up to examine the issue needs to be reviewed on points
of law. Existing evidence is not re-examined; legal interpretations are reviewed.
The Appellate Body can uphold, modify, or reverse the legal findings of the panel that heard the dispute.
Countries on either or both sides of the dispute can appeal.
The WTO’s dispute settlement procedure is seen as being vital to ensuring smooth international trade flows.
The Appellate Body has so far issued 152 reports. The reports, once adopted by the WTO’s disputes settlement
body, are final and binding on the parties.
WTO Appellate Body on Shaky Ground
Over the last two years, the membership of the body has dwindled to just three persons instead of the required
seven.
The understaffed appeals body has been unable to stick to its 2-3 month deadline for appeals filed in the last few
years, and the backlog of cases has prevented it from initiating proceedings in appeals that have been filed in the
last year.
With the Appellate Body unable to review new applications, there is already great uncertainty over the WTO’s
dispute settlement process.
If the body is declared non-functional, countries may be compelled to implement rulings by the panel even if they
feel that gross errors have been committed.
Should such a country refuse to comply with the order of the panel on the ground that it has no avenue for
appeal, it will run the risk of facing arbitration proceedings initiated by the other party in the dispute.
USA has crippled functioning the WTO:
The smooth and effective functioning of the Appellate Body, which is regarded as the jewel in the crown, has
posed hurdles to the U.S. for adopting unilateral measures.
Several U.S. provisions for imposing countervailing and anti-dumping measures were found to be inconsistent
with core provisions of the WTO agreements.
Finally, the U.S. chose to spike the Appellate Body by resorting to starving funds for its functioning as well as
blocking the selection process for filling six vacancies.
Consequently, the Appellate Body is left with only one member, who will not be able to deliver any rulings on the
pending trade disputes.
A minimum of three members are required to adjudicate any dispute.
India’s Role:
As the U.S. loses interest in multilateralism in trade, India should actively try to arrest the organisation’s slide
India should be more actively engaged to make the WTO a more equitable organisation.
India needs to work on persuading all members of the WTO to return to the table and negotiate on issues like
agriculture, industrial tariffs, and services.
India’s positions have much in common with the African nations’ stand; we have to build bridges with Africa.
India needed to quickly forge a larger alliance to counter the moves that are against India’s interests.
India’s journey towards achieving 5 Trillion Dollar Economy is not possible without expansion of our basket of
global trade.
Dispute Panels against India:
Recently, the Dispute Settlement Body(DSB) of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has set up two dispute
settlement panels targeting import duties imposed by India on a number of Information and Communication
Technology (ICT) products including mobile phones.
It was done on the request of Japan and Taiwan,taking up the number of panels constituted to examine the same
tariff-related issue to three.
In June 2020, the European Union(EU) had a panel established against India on the same issue.
The panels would determine whether India’s customs duties on imports of certain ICT products infringe the
WTO’s norms or not.
The panels have been set up to decide on 20% customs duty levied by India on mobile phones and some other
ICT products.
India’s Stand:
India managed to block Japan’s first request for a panel on the grounds that the complaint undermined India’s
sovereignty.
India alsorejected the EU’s suggestion of agreeing to one consolidated panel combining complaints from all three
of them and saving time and resources.
India argued that all three complainants are seeking to get the country to take on commitments under the
Information Technology Agreement-II (ITA-II) which it never agreed to.
India’s trade concerns and WTO:
Tariff on Steel and Aluminum– Recently the USA govt imposed 10% tariff on aluminum and 25% tariff on steel
against various trade partners. India wants that it should be removed or it will raise the issue in WTO.
Export Subsidy Issue– Recently USA dragged India to WTO and raised concern on the export subsidy regime
provided to the Indian companies in the form of SEZ, MEIS, EPCG, etc. USA argues that as India’s Per Capita
Income has increased from $ 1000, India can’t use the export subsidy regime as per the ASCM.
Agricultural subsidies – The present quota of subsidies is based on the price levels of 1986-88. Presently the
minimum support price (MSP) concept which provides subsidies to the farmers in India falls under the Amber
box. It can directly affect India’s food security program. India wants that it should be at the current price level and
the amber box concept should be done away with. However, through a ‘peace clause’ agreed to during the Bali
conference allows India to carry on with its PDS program as of now. But the developed member states are not
taking any steps for permanent solution of this problem.
Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) – During Doha round, member states agreed to provide favourable
treatment to developing nations. However, developed countries are denying the emerging economies such as
India and China as unworthy of this provision.
Issues related to intellectual property rights – The issues of compulsory licensing of medicines have been
resolved through TRIPS. However, the developed nations are trying to push for TRIPS+
Challenges:
Dispute settlement casescontinue to be filed for the time being and are being litigated. A civil dialogue over trade
issues persists.
Technical functioning is now wholly inadequateto meet the major challenges to the strategic relevance of the
WTO in the 21st century. In critical areas, the organisation has neither responded, nor adapted, nor delivered.
Dimensions of its structures and functions are fragile, creaking, and failing in parts.
Functioning of state enterprises engaging in commercial activities is interfering with and distorting the operative
assumption of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)/WTOthat international trade is to be
conducted, principally, by private sector operators in response to conditions of supply and demand through price
in a market economy.
Many WTO members bear responsibility for the use of trade-distorting domestic subsidies. Agricultural and
industrial subsidies have caused blockages in the system and prompted protectionist reactions in a number of
WTO members.
Blockage and deadlock in the Appellate Body stage of the WTO dispute settlement system triggered the present
crisis.
The WTO lost the critical balance between the organisation as an institution established to support, consolidate,
and bind economic reform to counter damaging protectionism, on the one hand, and the organisation as an
institution for litigation-based dispute settlement, on the other hand.
For years now, the multilateral system for the settlement of trade dispute has been under intense scrutiny and
constant criticism. The U.S. has systematically blocked the appointment of new Appellate Body members
(“judges”) and de facto impeded the work of the WTO appeal mechanism.
Growing protectionism: Over the past two years, governments have introduced trade restrictions covering a
substantial amount of international trade — affecting $800 billion in global imports in the past year alone. WTO
has been less affective in addressing them, including US China trade war. This raised questions over WTO’s
credibility.
WTO has played a very limited role in helping address other global issues related to trade, such as food security,
climate change and global trade imbalances.
Doha Development Round focused on reducing important trade barriers in sectors, such as agriculture, industrial
goods and services. However, after a decade of talks, it still remains to be concluded.
Way Forward:
A vibrant WTO cannot accommodate conflicting economic models of market versus state. All WTO members will
have to accept the operative assumption of a rules-based order steered by a market economy, the private sector,
and competition.
Launch negotiations to address the intertwined issues of agricultural subsidies and market access, while
recognising that food security concerns will not disappear.
A credible trading system requires a dispute settlement system that is accepted by all.
Launch serious negotiations to restore the balance, and it must be done in an open-ended plurilateral manner
that cannot be blocked by those who do not want to move ahead.
GATT/WTO rules in a number of areas are outdated. New rules are requiredto keep pace with changes in the
market and technology. Rules and disciplines on topics ranging from trade-distorting industrial subsidies to
digital trade require updates.
A reaffirmed commitment to the rules-based liberal market order with a development dimension must be the
foundational starting point.
What are your Feelings
Share This Article :
Still stuck? How can we help? Updated on December 14, 2022
Bretton Wood Conference Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Our Offline Our Initiatives Beginner’s Quick Links
Courses in Roadmap
Delhi + Editorial Discussions + VIDEO LECTURE PORTAL
+ Prelims Booster + UPSC Syllabus + ONLINE TEST PORTAL
+ OFFLINE Foundation Course + UPSC PYQ
+ MONTHLY MAGAZINES + ALL COURSES
2024-25 English
+ Udaan 500+ (prelim C.A.) + UPSC BOOK LISTS + UPSCNOTES
+ Prahaar (mains C.A.) + Aspirant’s Emotional + DOWNLOADS
Intelligence
+ PRAARAMBH BOOKS + KNOW ABOUT UPSC
+ PRELIMS STRATEGY
+ UPSC ESSENCE + UPSC PRELIMS
+ MAINS STRATEGY
+ UDAAN 2 .O + UPSC MAINS
+ INTERVIEW STRATEGY
+ PSIR OPTIONAL BOOKS + UPSC INTERVIEW
+ PRELIMS MOCK TEST
+ SOCIOLOGY OPTIONAL STRATEGY + UPSC TOPPERS
BOOKS
+ mains answer writing + UPSC CURRENT AFFAIRS
+ BLOGS
+ Topper’s Footsteps
+ Work with OnlyIAS
+ Contact Us
,
PRIVACY POLICY REFUND AND CANCELLATION POLICY FAQ TERMS & CONDITION