Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SYNOPSIS
Topic
1
Introduction
The competition commission of India is responsible for the regulation and enforcement of
Cartel laws which is governed by the Competition Act, 2002. The decision of the
competition commission regarding any particular case can be challenged and appealed to the
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and following to the Supreme Court of
India. The Competition Commission Act, 2002 bars the civil courts from the enforcement of
any proceeding in respect of any particular matter which is enunciated by the Commission
and NCLAT under the governed act.
The collusion of the companies into a single entity generally happens due to the fear of
missing out in the market. Generally, strong competing firms have an added advantage to
grab huge amounts of attention from the public for selling its products and services, therefore,
in order to curb that competition, the firms merge together to attain a higher amount of profits
collectively.
Types of Collusion
They are two ways of collusion; one is implicit and the other is explicit collusion. An explicit
collusion agreement occurs when the members of the cartel actually meet to decide upon how
to control the market. Such collusion is considered illegal in the jurisdiction of India by the
competition act. While on the other hand, Implicit collusion which is also termed as “tacit
collusion” essentially occurs when the members of the collusion show willingness through
their actions to engage in an agreement collectively.
2
Limiting the control of production, investment and sales services.
The act also involves cases with a criminal offence in the following cases namely: -
Paying penalty upto three times of total collective profits or ten percent of the
turnover.
3
4. Jeetendra Gupta v. Competition Commission of India4
4
Civil Appeal No. 30/2014
4
1.2. Statement of Problem
The issue of cartels and their legality under Indian competition law has been a subject of
debate and concern for policymakers, legal practitioners, and scholars. Despite the legal
prohibition against cartels, there have been instances of cartelization in various sectors of the
Indian economy, leading to adverse effects on consumer welfare and economic efficiency.
The problem is that the existing legal framework and enforcement mechanisms for detecting
and penalizing cartels may not be adequate to address the challenges posed by cartel
behavior. Therefore, there is a need for a critical analysis of the legality of cartels under
competition law in India, with a focus on identifying the gaps and limitations in the current
legal and regulatory framework and proposing appropriate reforms to strengthen the
competition law regime.
1.3. Objectives
To examine the legal framework for detecting and penalizing cartels under Indian
competition law, with a focus on the Competition Act, 2002 and its enforcement
mechanisms.
To critically analyze the economic, legal, and social implications of cartelization in
various sectors of the Indian economy, and assess the impact of cartels on consumer
welfare and economic efficiency.
To identify the challenges and limitations in the existing legal and regulatory
framework for detecting and penalizing cartels, and propose appropriate reforms to
strengthen the competition law regime.
To explore the international best practices and experiences in regulating cartels, and
assess their relevance and applicability to the Indian context.
To examine the role of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in regulating
cartels and promoting competition in the Indian market, and evaluate its effectiveness
in addressing the challenges posed by cartel behavior.
1.4. Hypothesis
Following Hypothesis has been nullified in the research project:
The existing legal and regulatory framework for detecting and penalizing cartels
under Indian competition law is effective in deterring cartel behavior and promoting a
competitive market structure in India.
5
The role of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in regulating cartels and
promoting competition in the Indian market is effective in deterring cartel behavior
and ensuring a competitive and efficient market structure in India.
1.5. Research Methodology
The method adopted here is “Doctrinal method” of acquiring information. Doctrinal method
allows the researcher to carry out a detailed historical research (history of law, for e.g.),
whereby the information has been gathered with the use of secondary sources with
established facts and figures, thus aiding in acquiring a better conceptual clarity.
6
References
Books
Basu, K. (2019). Antitrust and Cartelization in India: Policies and Practice. Springer.
Chowdhury, S. K. (2018). Competition Law in India: Policy, Issues, and
Developments. Routledge.
Dwivedi, A., & Mishra, M. K. (2019). Competition Law in India: Policy, Issues, and
Challenges. Springer.
Articles
Aiyar, A. S. (2017). Competition Law and Cartels in India. Economic and Political
Weekly, 52(2), 50-57.
Jain, S., & Suri, A. (2018). Cartel Enforcement in India: Lessons for Emerging
Economies. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 6(2), 236-255.
Mehta, A. (2018). An Analysis of Cartel Regulation in India: Current State and Future
Prospects. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 14(1), 87-110.
Patra, D. P. (2019). Cartelization and Competition Law in India: A Study of Major
Legal Developments. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24(4), 202-211.
Reports
Competition Commission of India. (2020). Annual Report 2019-20. Government of
India.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs. (2019). National Competition Policy. Government of
India.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). Competition Law
and Policy in India. OECD Publishing.