1. Aiko sued Gie for non-payment of the latter's obligation.

Gie won the case, not on its merits, but on

mere technicality. Nevertheless, when Aiko asked again Gie to pay, the latter paid the former. Now, Gie
demands the return of what she has paid Aiko on the ground that she should not paid Aiko since she ha
no more obligation under the law. Is the contention of Gie valid?

No. Gie shouldn't demand a return from Aiko because that is Gie's obligation as a debtor. Debtor should
pay a certain amount to creditor. Even Gie won the case on technicality, it doesn't mean that she has
the right to demand a return.

2 . Peter orally agreed to sell his cellphone to Jomar on May 28, 2021 for Php 8,000.00 wherein Jomar
gave Peter the amount of Php 2,000.00 as down payment. After a few days, Peter denied that such sale
existed between the two. Can Jomar enforce the sale despite the fact that the contract was oral and the
price was more than Php 500.00?

No. Jomar cannot enforce the sale because the contract must be in writing despite of the price was
more than 500 pesos. It will be only valid if the contract is a written document and it's price exceeds the
amount of 500 pesos.

3. Bruce Banner and Tony Stark made it appear that Bruce Banner is selling and transferring the
ownership of his land to Tony Stark when their real intention is merely to mortgage the said land. Bruce,
who is a known hot head thus gaining the notorious name "the Hulk", came to a disagreement with
Tony Stark. Out of anger, Bruce Banner stated that the agreement between him and Tony is of no effect
or void. Is the contention of Bruce Banner correct?

No. Because Bruce Banner has this attitude of being low tempered at the same time they have no clear
agreement or there's no meeting of the minds. It's not clear if Bruce will sell and transfer land to Tony or
they will mortgage it.

4. Matanda and Bata, a minor, came to an agreement that the former will buy the latter's land. Bata
upon reaching the age of majority, came to Matanda to ratify the said contract on his perceived belief
that the contract is voidable. Matanda, after buying the said land, found out that the land is not suited
for agriculture thus refused the ratification of the sale. Is the refusal of Matanda allowed by law?

Yes. Matanda can refuse the ratification of sale because the contract was voidable.