You are on page 1of 3
Question 2 Example Candidate Respons: cris a Laoguay Aficaled bey Wot, yeteroerl oe __| | gicemod _FUchoss. Therap al Oren aed Bod pele oxen 4 CFE Oot SOA | gly tue Like bacpeues | Ce ee i ee Cee ae ea voc ceiion Oa day aoen pecple lcane om _| Sep ato dele t02cos' each aod_odt let | Sacivhy dirtate iudat bye ck a ae Shad be secl Cn S tite Cl tcc inca Beas Lo lepectng Lengvage, AC lecding to tae Gcticle, “90 ch tacas later tay an _| al le hee Scienteie. oucoal do a eid @ to cose." Métomediome isa hype of me dene Llaece some use A sboxls_aad_cacchices, | + “i watts | the langage used ta deccNae oatdsca! | ened ment eon b0 5220 94 euiderce to pein 13 dee to ne CeaRen Abas thee has od been Cec! chenge +0 sing —-tecmicolony dao ciple, Sipheamindd| Bran ner there cet i Cad _ ck of tue chore tnlating Pais cache. UC @ Te candidate shows an effective contol of expression as, they introduce the topic with 2 reference tothe stimulus material @ Tre candidate accurately plies the linguistic terminology. © Tre embedded quote is long and its not clear how i relates to the point being made. ‘The candidate discusses the concept of linguistic prestige in relation to the language used in the ‘medical and scientific fields, but they do not name any theoretical approaches. @ Altrough he candidate does not refer to any specific theorists, thele discussion of inguiste Prescriptivism and descriptivism is generally effective. @ The candidate's discussion now becomes very effecve as itis tied to examples from the stimulus material Rather than embedding such a lot of material from the text provided, ‘the candidate could explain the point made by the article and then evidence it with only the most relevant part of the quote er late Response POC) bdtyy kn rdarshind ow. sclonkists see how i Fe Comemicatio Actorpd ction “theory helps 40 clio uted ou ats ye SUC fe helene on sarc ofa, the CAT teecry explaset low Hue Sciontot' ado atcommdcse to tne laryasye 40 eg __| | and Gt fot foe sorte || land forties tae te cypact a6 it. ta the Cacia | —Lengsage cad 4¥2 OVE lias ony reusens | title Yio cae lao. Adee at power \ANiier ___| end aavlive (potesioc_erenagas to See shat laclsee | staatd_Lateac Hod ete a beak ndehis Jadot: ges" csente boy tre. Bel cocancnitey — SUC CAT may be relevantio the points raised in the ate, but the candidate omits the authorship reference (Giles), The candidate's ‘comment on why the theory is relevant tothe textis unclear. © The candidate's conclusion includes the idea of new medical terms being created as a departure from those being used atthe time the stimulus material was being written. However, this is a key point raised in the text and could be discussed more effectively earlier in the response. provides an effective discussion of some key ideas contained in the stimulus material. Their expression Is effective with some detalled ‘development. They demonstrate knowledge and understanding of linguistic concepts, methods and approaches but do nat always Include enough details when referencing, Total mark awarded = 1B out of 25 How the candidate could have improved their answer ‘The candidate selected some very long quotes as evidence for the points they made. To Improve their answer, the ‘candidate could have selected shorter quotes that were completely relevant to the points being made, ‘The candidate introduced in the conclusion an idea that new and more appropriate medical terms should be ‘created, but they needed to explore this key point much earlier in the response. To improve their answer, the candidate needed to use more quotes from the text to evidence their own ideas, for example the use of metaphor and euphemism, and 3s particular point could have been incorporated more effectively ‘The candidate needed to refer to the relevant theorists when they discussed the linguistic concepts in their response. To improve their answer, they needed to explore concepts, methods and approaches more fully. For ‘example, the candidate could have incorporated Aitchison into their discussion on descriptivism and prescriptivism. Common mistakes candidates made in this question ‘+ The most common mistake made by candidates was to make no reference to linguistic concepts, methods and ‘approaches and some candidates were not awarded marks for AOA, In this question, candidates were asked 10 use examples from their wider study ofthe topic; those who did not were not fully answering the question. ‘Appropriate theories for discussion in this question might have included Aitchison, Philipson or Fodor, for example. ‘Many candidates chose to chronologically paraphrase the text provided, but did not develop the discussion. This approach could, to an extent, demonstrate some understanding of the stimulus material. However, candidates needed to carefully select some of the key points raised and then develop those as fully as possible. ‘This question required a discursive response which discussed the ideas raised in the text. It did not require an analysis ofthe form, language andior structure of the text. Many candidates attempted a linguistic analysis of the \wrter’s language, and even in some cases used ito try to interpret the writer's gender which was not relevant to the question ‘Many candidates used very long quotes from the tex toilustate the points made. The clearer responses were ‘those which used shor, salient and moce frequent quotes, rather than long quotes which took more time for the candidates to write out.

You might also like