GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA Office of the Superintending Engineer, TDWSP Circle Warangal From To Sri N Yesuratnam,M.Tech, The Chief Engineer, Superintending Engineer, TDWsP, TDWSP Circle, Hyderabad. Warangal, Lr. No.AEE/MS Pl PUMPING MAIN/LMD-Park: igal/2016, Dt: 17-03-2016 Sir, Sub:- TDWSP (RWS&S) Circle Warangal ~ “Providing drinking water supply to 10 Mandals in Warangal district from LMD- Manakondurexin-Parkal, StnGhanpur, Warangal Segment" in Warangal district of Telangana Drinking Water Supply Project including Operation and Maintenance for 10 years under TDWSP Project. Re-submission of Pumping Mains of MS pipe line from LMD to Mallapur- for approval ~ Regd. Ref:- 1, Agreement No: 03/2015-16 dated 06.11.2015 2. EE/MS PI PUMPING MAIN/LMD-Parkal-Warangal/2016, Dt: 16-03-2016 3. AEE/LS & Plans/MS PI/_LMD-PRKL-WGL/2016, Dt: 10.02.2016 of Superintending Engineer TDWSP Circle, Warangal 4. Memo. No. AEE/DEE (designs) TDWSP/001/2015-16, Dt: 11.01.2016 of ENC, RWS & S Hyderabad. 5. Memo. No. AEE/DEE (designs)/ TD WSP/002/2015-16, Dt: 11.03.2016 of CE, TDWSP Hyderabad. With reference to the above subject, the Executive Engineer TDWSP Division Parkal has submitted the remarks raised in the memo vide reference 3rd cited above, for the Pumping Main MS Pipe of 2000 mm dia 16 mm thick from LMD to Mallapur Hillock of length 12831 Rmt. The above pressure main redesign is submitted as per the guide lines communicated through reference 4" & 5" cited above. The detailed information submitting along with MS Pipeline Hydraulic Calculations, thickness calculations, Surge Analysis Report for Pumping main - MS Pipe 2000 mm dia after dividing the pipeline in to various pressure zones by considering the pressure head and techno-economic aspects in the approved hydraulic statement after conducting re-survey. the thickness of MS Pipeline for various zones are arrived 18mm, Jémm & 14mm. Hence, | request the Chief Engineer, TDWSP. Hyderabad. to verify the correctness and approve the designs, at an earliest. Encl: Above HS, Thickness Calculations Yours faithfylly, & Surge Analysis Report SuperintenYfing Engineer DWSP Circle Warangal. atGOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA Supply and 83 Department of hief Engineer TOWSP, Hyderabat No, AEBDEE.(desians 2018-16, Dated: 1103/2018 Sub: TDWSP Minutes ofthe masting on design paramos and design methedooay {obo adopted fer he design of tis pursing man ppeines conmuneates-Regarng Ret 1. To Memo No AEEIDEE|deslns)TDWSP\G01/2015.18,0t1 1/01/2018 Dies ofthe Mesting on doign muthosaogy of MS Pumping mn, Ot o.0a2086 Furth tothe insructons ined in reference 1" ted, he mines o the mactng ofthe Chit Engineers and Consultants of TDWSP, convened ard ced by the Advso to the Government, Telangana State i erence 2" ced, shar wih communtated el tho Superintending Engineers and Exeeube Engneers of TOMSP wt instucons oadoot the aczepled desgn pormelare and design methoélogy forthe desi of MS pumoing maine re rte oft Mesting slang win dso metodo of MS purong Mn sw ie Enginoer TOWSP-" Hyserabas ‘lie Chit Engineer, OWS? for infomation and necessary actin, ‘Aine Gotan, TDWSP fr notion and necaccry acon, [Al'the Superiening EnpinoorsExecuve. Enginoar, TOMISP for Infomation and reconeay action incraor Wwe, Exqgtve Engler (Desors)Further fo the meeting on 28022016 on dean methodlogy of MS Puning mala, in articular on the design pressure to be adopted, a foow up meeting was arenged ard wes ‘aed by the Advisor tothe Goverment long wit th Cie Engineers and the Constants on ososan: “The followingofcers were stended the meeting 1. Sr Gyaneshwar,Adisor to Govt, Talngana State Si Sorsh Kumar Che Ergncer, OWS Sl. GXtupabar Rey, Chie Engineer, TOWS-2 Sei Magan Mohan Reddy, Chit Engineer, TOWSP-3 5. SiLP Babu Roo Chit Technic Coordinstc, 2 a 4 SILP Manohar Babu Consutan(besins) SV Sass Reddy, Techies Coorinto, 8. se.egan Mohn, Constant, 8. iP. Ram Gopal Reddy, Constant 10. S.Preseona Kumar Eecutve Engines, Designs, TOWSP 11. 51.0 Macho Rody, y,Ercutve Engine, Designs, TOWS? 12, Smt Mil As. Exec Engineer, Designs TOUS The minutes ofthe meeting aes follows: ‘was placed before th commie in te astmeotng on 28.2 2018, wheter edpt be ‘etowing factor forthe iterl desig resin te design oF MS pipe fx punng mane and request to make any suggests for he cesionprssutes mes tobe woking presse {X15 forte pumping min win working eresnur mare than 10 bars. th eal ‘Ses pressure shal be 1.8 ines tothe maxirun working presture fh each or stato pressure pis 20% of resitare surge press’, whichever higher. 4 X61 forte pumping main wth woking pressure between 5010 bas. the 'eemal design pressure shal be 18 times tothe maim woking presse o he ‘ach or ttc pressure lis 20% of suitor supe presaue, whichever is higher5X2, fortepumsng main with woking pressure upto Sbareie. the interal dsign Pressure shal b 2 te othe maximum working presi i reach or atic ‘ressure pls 20% ofresutant surge pressure’ whichever ihe “The osu’ surge reser i the sug stored by th pine sr coniring ie urge proteeton equa 2 During eit mesg tore ofthe commies merbers had exressd tlhe above ‘tector were fed and whateritwascscussed we any Consult, specaed inthe sige ans nd design of MS panes aed aco whether here ie recdenoe of adoption ofthe stove octors whl designing of MS pumping sing | 3 inthis content twas pice before the commits that he stove params were led by discussing wit Dr. 8. Lingreddy of KY PIPE Further Rwas ao care tht Mls Tela Consisting Engineers have adopted a 30% of supe preseue nthe design of MS Pumping ain or ROSAS, or Kishna Phase Il projet ‘4 Thecommiee ra opned io btn he suggetons ot ome oe exper organs, hic reine recs of sign igh pressure mans, since ter no sfion terature ‘273 coal provisions avaiable te evalit the surge alowancs. 5. Tre conmites na acopod to obtain the commenttuggetios fom (1) Mis WARCOS, who en ipene for veting (2), Mls Tala Consiting Engineers, wh are te Constant MWS in preparation of DPR of Kehna War Supply Scheme Phase andi and 0 Pace before he commie wt the stove ree ecenmendatns incu KY PIPE 6. Since he nemo rom ts KY PIPE had areas toon obtained, lees wore addressed {0M WAPCOS end Us Tata Coneuling Engineers 17. The copes ofthe responses fom Mls KY PIPE, Mls Tela Consting Engineer nd Wis WAPCOS wore placoa beer the comme suring the mestng and ther suggestions ae 38 fotows + is ir PIPE has sungeste hatte desig prose for fe pening ma st be then 5X testo the wrtng pressure andthe X ves to be consored at 1502, tate n paragraph above ‘+ Mis Tata Consutng Engineers nas expresos thr unlingness tobe associ wih -RWSES depsrtnet io xan hei series onthe subect mater. 1 ite WAPCOS axing the deberatons requested o prove he surge ans deta ‘be pumping mains on tres condense. wh warn pressure les than bar. 51010 rand more than 10 bar Accorngy wer provided o Mle WAPCOS forthe tweeDamp mais wth above conto. Upon vw oh pe aah resus fr ‘ove pie man win rer presage Mt WAPCOS hve ewe the ‘owing desn press tobe spt or geson of MS eines 1 18tines mean wong ess. it Masnuanstat pessure 30% of masa surge pressure witout preston 5, Maxum sta presi sue protsre when ne fie etal \» sce tle. ‘tar exnaton of rests fo Shove cass is WAPCOS have conse an ‘vagetes adopter eX) 16 ne nwa head dsgn of prog Ms WAPCOS have ao segs adopt he deft for wring hed pris ee Invi ft above suggestions the conte seed adhe maximo he ‘oon design etude of Spun mak + 18tines momen wot pressure + Meum sae presse 08 of masnu page pase wut proteion 4 The come sorter sped foing in et of unig man. 2 Sue dnspatg docs tab proved othe ue restr mn of {W%etwupe west pecinn, 5 The in icine sobs ered tee 85822-1804 setng 15 tnes toe wong ressue at np te sage say. sa set sw. eo. Aevsorte Gov. chef Engineer chet Engineer Chit Engines Tlangana state © Towse rowse2 rows sa sa. (het Technical Coordinator ——_procurment Spit ‘consuitant (Desire) tows tows rows 8a, so. sw Techical Coordinator Procurement Specilet recatve Engineer rowse rows esis TOWSP meraonOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA ural Water Supply and Sanitation Department tice ofthe Engineerin-Chiet, RWSBS, Hydes bad (designs) 2018-16, Dated: 11/01/20: seca abl” Parameters ant dean methodology during the watee meeting for the design of MS ppetines. rt Mina te stn long win design mabdeny sal Engineer-n-Chie, RW SSS, Hycerabed To ‘Aine Go Gnas, TOMS? for intormaton and necessary avon Aline Sonsliants, TOWSP for ivormaton and necosec cla rerBon Exec he Ergiral Sogn fie Sevnutes of Mect sign Methodology of MS Pipeline Held at office ofthe ragineer-in- Chief, RWS8S, Hyderabad on DiDg Ot tee (meting was aranged by the Egineenin- Chief, RWSAS chaired by the Advisor wo the setamnment long wilh the Coneeraed CES, SEs, EES, DEES, AES ie Cres Sameera sie representative from M/S WAPCOS and Dr. P Raghweet Rag, Sean aces crass erartent of Civil Enginerng, Indian Insite of Sslenee Bargions ee on design methodology of MS pipeline The following officers attended the meeting Sti. Gyaneshwar, Advisor to Government, Telangana Site Sti. ¥. Suresh Kumar, Chief Engineer, TDWSP Si. G. Krupakar Reddy, Chief Engineer, TDWSP ‘Sti M. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Chiet Engineer, TDWSP vi. M. Narsing Rao, Consultant Si P. Babu Rao Chief Technical Coordinator Sti. P, Manohar Babu, Consultant (Designs) Si V. Srinivasa Reddy, Technical Coordinator si Jagan Mohan, Consultant, 10. Dr. PRaghuveer Rao, Senior Scientific Officer, IS, Bangalore 11.Sti, DS. Rami Reddy, Mis WAPCOS Consultan, 12 Si. ML. Prasanna Kumar Executive Engineet, Designs, TDWSP. 13. Sn. K. Ravinder Reddy, Dy. Executive Engnecr, Planning, TDWSP |4. Si. D. Madhava Reddy, Dy. Exocutive Engineer Designs TDWSP 15.5, D Ganesh, Dy, Executive Engineer, Designs, TDWe? 16: Si. Te Narayana Srinivas, Dy. Executive Engineer, TDWSP 17. Sri. D, Malleswara Reo, Dy. Exeoutive Engineer, [DWSP {8 Sti Chalama Reddy, Dy. Executive Engineer, TBWSP, Mahsboobnager 19. Sn. Ravi Keishna, Dy. Executive Enginer, TDWSP, Mahaboobnagac 20. Se. B. Kumar Swamy, Asst. Executive Engineer, Designs TDWoe 21, Smt. M. Mythil, Ass. Executive Engineer, Desins TOWSP ‘The gist ofthe meeting is as follows re Mair trunk mains envisaged in Mission Bagiratha are MS pipe ins. The contrasting eznsies have submited the design of MS pipe considering provisions in [WWA goblicadcs Ro. MI Design of large diameter ste! pipes, owing to which the required pipe thknese heg Rena! ormously, in a paniculer case, It was instructed by the Engineern-ohiel RWSAS, fo review the design and parameters requzed for the design Sf MS pe a review meeting of the Chief Engineers, Consultants, Departmental Engineess sel Det Ticer, IISc, Bangalore as 3" party reviewer was convened tnd chaired by the Advisor co the Government, Telangana State For design of MS pipeline design parameters such as Overburden, Bedding constants of ‘ipeline, Soil Modulus, Design pressure, Equivalent thicknes/stffness, Partial vacuum, Soll density and applicable design checks have been discussed in detail and the pasometts ix respect of designs are discussed and concluded as below,ens of sturated fl Be Outer ciamete of pipe Busta of wench =(86¥0 3908) Soil over burden ontop of pipe Tota on pipe wiWy2+ Wy, ‘Step. Check for Deflection for part vacuum 1 The deflection for partial vacuum conditions with Dit(O"Ko"W RISEN 2P. Ke" R49 08 "Ry Winer DeTine ag factaes ide support mie ssorcance with IS 6822-1964, Ciuse £2 Nr class 8 bessing oe per sgroement conditions chapter 4S poe, cause 24 sy ‘shen 260089, WeAW/2+ Wi, Total ead on pipe RePipe intemal radius ees Perpaal vecwum pressure, Le 1 vacuumed 33kglom* ‘Combined Moment tinea "Sol modulus based on below tbls per WW manu Mand a pr egreement i [asst | Unianpea ~ 70 (le Raping (SO HPT 0 [Gass [Compact asic we = Case — | Campacea to a0 HE 70 [ev — | Canmacas SB i ‘The value of 0 modus of pala sha be Wake a8 er agreameA COMTIGRT TN ‘esign flow presaure MS pipeline, fr whi be intuece of som ‘al be cel separately on caso by case base. 2 The detection for pipe full and under pressure conditions wit side supper ts Dx2e(O1°Ke" RSE PrKSHRAS+O.O83"e R99) here OTe lag factors t dus prevaling, he e-BeddingCoateent er erica deecton, depending on angle of support, or ntermyy sre oad with fad spread of 120i taken a8 0.088, Weta" W%, Total oad on pipe RePipe imeral radius Peinternlaesign pressure, -Combined Mement of inertia Soll modulus based on table 3 2 of MANA manual Mt and as per agreement. Peimissibte detection a per AVWWA Manual M11 shal be a belowmane Be Ed -— Troweewormmans > mov sos ae. a ‘meres 23 Sees ‘te shee! pectin ines : 20 Wer? (ea a ca ag ‘08, heh po al cen wth wig Pare Taper? rer deprcom nnsarom > pte gecesi ares S300 20 Nem ‘Neaoncany ater BTS Sa eo ecisexattay00n250080+198)) ‘isbacametetomeneeatamse se men Defer? Erie cn aranre Wem sain sileetconyotrepncusvicws2 = ae (22a xcgrzg nto +22) 1), Tres of pl or Fact contin ees ‘ape2 eeaeanereooxaiontn-22) agus These sig Coenen Alowanee 400 pees es eee Site 9 her brng Sar AM > Noni tig (omen 5 ) ‘ert Bere Fc 0 Osh, ons SS ee Fieicpaweceenersretm | Maze SEalmacartentaranas 85 yaad « one EIMNST Paes aammnensiin sont re SSR ay sean woot tan none ssn nay rraitener en atte ‘sc ig Prin ntact eres el eta Pt rae a ob ‘Ao. roti st ya HED roe sccm races 0 os Seema Sap hen ae Wein SDD aD he 01083 ebm en Dita Pre oan hme HD Sion) hack orto dito coton prenrspr te ouranats oi sce ne sesame 004 Pe sie eon owomactsah aston a‘Sp: neo Detecton wh pra vacua (a vem omer setae! sa ent ssrioent we le erent BHR) owatonna nega ston od See — (wom seu oxo nara) = mas) s+ gay Gomera ¢ BU et 3 ae crate =langana Dreking Wator Sup,ae = -_——4 SO mre en SSeS a remy a2 Seu ‘thon area, oor sets destin net Werucocenrsm oa Sern sont SET on mee oa ‘Sehurcaun tet hovouoe bartonc tase, nenePremee om oe begsorz2 gnaexa.0 x15) Signer Sem, ret tite amt tp se apere Hera etn remus Nm : ao Se ercaies & ee ed tertean 2 xan Tecenaeaeyane eae ae be gvetvayegsazonenzsy SNe(2521721 fx004280500 +235) faites ssn caer ewan eae Sep 2) Check or Handing peri 82 athena 24 200050) 402 4 25 wm ‘80939 Cac orb Spe RIA Manat Sree) Nenepenernrrsoesoateains) 1 i Snmtemenersteeesooeim) ta -Sigaatenteratens neni) om (tote ren asta ‘Ato Suing ene cours TEIN) 3 oa ‘peu uring Pence unten acum yh RoCNDYPoe| ee ent wetted ss ‘Spec suac nore ooo aricept eck om oad Brg Pree nanan hers oat cry Presa a iad tReet oa rg Puce in ed eco 930. Check or bshing cota aire at pth equamen sees sana emt coe St ‘Sep 8) Pipe Stes Caletone Imes aee= 03450539? 7 waame See nie eee mh cee ara Tee Show ‘Sep 9: Check fe Deacon pais acum et 18 th acum) sateen Winton. ks i kee Sie tee ete + game ‘enone aa) Sin cit ae tt sen ee (9D con ee See tern IRN Son 21408 eger< ‘1000 ten? ° o ERS “ \ 0) et, thar ne SH ror” "86 Siefangana Drinking Waterjeu nsing oe Sas Sete 2 eS Sheiom 2 ees = Soir sp actor ct tt Pree : aon ‘o> Weld etfency of he Jat CL 8-15 5822 oo qanaon guage son Fae ae = erence =r gassing gona se, et i ts nae aewe uss2tze pooszs0¥00 +2489) ‘Sp Check fr anag a pr 82-04 Anenire 24 (2000+ 303/400 25 0m ‘ep 38) Char buchng ss per ANWA Mana mr een SS rece Eewcducagennmsegenemmi steer AlwablBasing Ps an vFSXS2REE AIC! 33 tonna ‘Jeu Bang Prat fn veo shea Pgh wee siptemndmercranenns (iets ta ens atop Aetna cots ra ac cer RAN eu bag Precast sete EDD Sep 30) chsh or clings to coon rset egdrment cite ae Shmtpmmartr big Peet SEOF ‘sep Pe sien Coston tenctirncene gan 2 pial‘sip 6: feces near mene meinen laren: on (Ws a6 ar on eee . rev aomate ear BH haha haw ae eer ee, eases ae yyererrwsssae — aa Too sor —errea SE [bO0ear Pokal hese] on oe (4) lay punoip| 79H [ened [er [eM] one | IT | wren [P| aeeay AES “CL ef 2 <)romn masien a caw wen Bruna ep wa G00 BH al“PomH Nee oF GIT WOH IRA BoRtuna pw oaGe Aeau | eS | tig | sumone | stme”|BumvO ‘ontoa [mer | NE] yore || rc secu wees | pmo ona] ting on {Pewee oF OFF wou we Burana op wa aHE SR‘pean pen ae | Suncom “eon den oon wo Bang wp wa BEBE SIs}slsialelatalalals| sjalelalatslels| ww) Pe noone tay we Uw Bion Ip Dae SHaMWan 0 (gy) 95, Bacay Soma Beebe ee RS we S25 HL ng bu : : ae mara ‘paint semua, ms ae Surv ‘uaniea | 124 [epee ane | sinelara [orrese [oe ee Ag Tl of a2 <0 HInGEvEn 8 Ge WOH HEM Bung ep UU 00e SH“Pom eden oF ONT WH EM Bung aR BNE SNfar “paunbou spoon weno | sso Burwon o POH SEEN oF GIF WOH HER BBG pw og ASSE oR -paimbay ‘Pom snes ONT nN Bling ip na one A“Penn ndeyeW ot a¥T oH en Bung pw OSE SMSeer ire (ere rey ors Serer Se are fae baer rr [oes owt foe ese oa Ser fovea foevat—aet — [eo eae oa Saree frei fo atte 0 ne oa steer [a er Sue Sere [aee— pe fare oe bare faess — reer eevee loot tare Serene oe Sever aves — raat au posse —50+ er rane oe reer renter — eer fern oree— [ers frre forsee tea Soree_—ooeey — ire fcre_ooee— ferro sree ia ieesees [aun — frees hassaoewie—feers—teee roe sere fresee fear — Tce fsa toner ary joo Some SE farae fore — [are ferrafostor ferro re fess [oars priser — eres fare fos yer hner— re free fae fevue=— over — fear fea (ueiee_[ery— (non ae outs Seftor — far (aerae—[ury—(0 ue nents ‘ a %o a : ag sg fete soy | ten fee ta | 2, | 0 |evsunoal eens | Sth, | Suman | apne” [oumon| 7H | Leng | roar | TmttT sony | 2M | tg | PD|ecety nt ne mm [OY | rion we oNTeme Tae ors are oT fesse — fron fav at-foordor pore nis farser oar fessor fore oe ar — foo aru fare fore aE afm steer foostse—[urre oo jareet oar fesentfoossoe—[eare ro neve — [mor eset foossse—[are ro faces — foes sonra foonsot— fee erode favesr [ano fsreee ove so {oonsat— [eer se ator Peres [ano [erate —frooee peor foorsat— [oer esses esr furs feveee rosea ere Taras saeeoe—f oso foe oct [oso foe ssoase—foeoune ssoue—forss vena —froota fee acnoe— [eae aca feoeeeEe= isn ise aarp ae fart [oe lsseee ron ls arava ievad —[os fpazee afro ba Eerie [oe ar lvoe [ores levees fron bare rr ae sane [are ee oar ne fares ar hero [osrs freer oon ba eee [pe ar rar —foae w | | "7 jeemsai | uononais . ‘peony waa | sso oa « r orm | ate | aug vow | Kong |“ [emt] one | EIT | pron [POO seg MS |, peoH ones) ofins XEN'#/9|5}5\5/=/5\5\=)elele|slalslalslalslelelalals'slalslalal ww'pan | peau peay | ween Jaren} ieiay| ote | td | cw | ~ SUL cS ae | uy | tomtom | ane |Bemn| 7% | Keng | ros | MM | jon | 92! | ay |T8PIOD sscy ‘ osouns [+ brei opm onevworonotd| w on wap | pup wyoney uss} oa ry wo | fuowom [sare Burm] 7M | Konig | nmos. | OMIA omer | si [°° seu conan | Om Jon] 7 | oag | ROH 0 "Pou IndENE GWT WON GA Buna I wee SH[arr — fora fest —[essare roar lear I rareze— [arse prec Ios I ae erace ear sooser sa loos eat ievace fare sete nos aE besi22—| —oe—[rbs2e— Taos [ar see os aE |r parsve— [oe ae rH rvs |, [nur] ag seer | samsoae | anorea |, O2MOM ‘een | see feos ma em "eon nde oan HO: A Bang wp GONE SHvonsnd yee wren fuerte] oe | 8, | 09, La pra caren om sent ammo te | sieere [epeow neil tins om {Pom ode ot GPT WOH VNR Bouna IP WA ORE ASqn etuose ‘9049 (SHSMY) 22S sso mena se a Fam oewa Sem dena, NL “ened a Ma ae y ore (an Toro T [oes eto oe [aor co Torrie os jane i abe Oe Slaotor—} (aro) oe [a ero) fsrare co (aE iat) ser i [aco sro) oe [ane rer nese os (a rar Tos o82 os (neo + nr eorsse oe (neo faze 0 oor [rr re |oos vor [zz 0 OSE OF : i w A = speumboy [Oazneeed | uoRDNCN | aoa [ur pean |e pean ryan | acon wag | 24 | wy cio) Snort | tO | yt | sumo | sane" sowom| 7% | Kawa | woos” |s=0amt| yor | ter | eum PO) scum re wun {Pou ander tap WOH UNH Buu Ip Ua OBE AKa f ‘ee, Easeati ee Providing Drinking Water Supply In Warangal District Pipeline from LMD to Mallapur Hill ‘A Report on ‘Transient Modeling and Design of Surge Protection System kyr, Dr. Sa eee | aD. PE, Fk DWRE [RYPIFE LLC, Leigion, KY USA, losinTable of Contents: ‘iio [jem No [Description of em Pago Wo +9 Introduction and ta Summary % 20 Transient model runs 05 C 27 | Suge protection easement 7 22 [Adstenal moseing scenes 14 23 | Senstiviy anaes 16 24 [Pump startup eonaions 8 38 Summary 20 40 Recommendations | a2 Se |r 1. Sinn nga, aD, PE, Fe, DWRE | Tani Aa nd Da of Se kyr KYPIPETLC-Lexgin KY USA Protas S a [fama Toes 7S]Min and Max {000 Elevation (meters) Lover tint in Figure 3. Envelope of MAXIMIN transient prossures without any protection 2.1 Surge Protection Equipment After several attempts, a satisfactory protection against both high and low transient pressures was achieved using one bladder vessel and a few surge-suppressing three-stage non-slam air roleaselvacuum vais. Bladder vessel & located immediately downstream fom the pump ‘discharge header. Figure 4 shows location ofthe non-slam air valves, Pressure relief valves (PRV) and bladder vessel. Figure 6 shows the Max/Min pressure envelope for this pipeline system with protection based on non-slam air valves, PRV and bladder vessel, eA a ‘Dr Srniasa Linge, PAD, PE FE, DWRE | —Trasant Arps and Design of Songs KYPIPE KYPIPE LUC, Lexingon, KY USA, ProtetonS aionins. ~Repa=RevsonFigute 4. Pipeline schematic depicting locations of bladder vessels and non-slam air valves Min and Max é Distance (km) "Envelope ——LowertLint. —in Cavitation Max ] Figure 5. Envelope of MAX/MIN transient pressures with surge protection /As evident from Figure &, the proposed surge protection completely relieves the system from ‘cavitation pressures while bringing down the maximum pressures to around 12m. The lowest Pressure in the pipeline system during the 200 seconds transient simulation was 40.7m and the highest pressure was +169m. Figure 6 shows the variation of pressure head at a few representative nodes where the lowest pressure dropped below zero, As noted in Figure 6, Srna Linge, PRD, PE, FE, DWRE | —Transané Aaljs and Design oF Sas KYPIPE KYPIPE LLC, Lexingon, KY USA E Protection System Raison | [OaPiessures that dropped below zero lasted for a short period and hence pose no danger to the Pipetine a l / = y, fia aa Sf : | 2 4 Presure hea below ze eo medaka GO Le — | = sy Figure 6. Variation of pressure head at some representative node where the low pressures below 2er0 Figures 7 and 8 show variation of pressure head at pump discharge manifold without protection and with protection respectively. Figure 9 shows the variation in pump speed following pump tip | event, | TO T Ps - ‘Dr. Srna Linge, PHD. PE. FUE, DWRE | —Transant Aras and Design of Sane KyPPE. IKYPIPE LLC, Lexingon, KY USA, Protection Sytem nani [Ritson1 wre = eg ee i Tete) a Figure 7. Variation of pressure head at pump discharge manifold without protection 180) Lal soy 10) t 1 Cpl po for Hh yr WA A TA «| «| apn Ly 2 ee ore eae 1% m0 Figure 8. Variation of pressure head at pump discharge manifold wit protection Siar TOF I ite OP ‘Dr. Srna Linge, Fi. PE FE. DWRE Transient Anal and Design oT Surge | KYPIPE IKYPIPE LLC, Lexington, KY USA Protection System . Riga Ravson [sh TDG7 a ry | 5 0 In| 7 : oe 8 00 wo iio 10 160 tap a0 “Tine ee) Figure 8, Pump speed run-down curve following pump trip Figure 108 shows the pressure head variation within the bladder vessel. The purple graph Fepresents pressure head variation inside the bladder vessel and red graph represents pressure head variation ouside the bladder vessel (tthe pipe connection on main ine). Figure 10b shows ‘variation in gas volume within the bladder vessel, Pa e 7 7 7 : z | 4 fn Wu Ay 7 7 7 7 ST ee =o a "en Pema a tn cn a rslaton Tasos com | ee = ae eeto io aoe aOR Tine (22) Figure 11. Variation of head at some representative node (AIR-8) with NO protection +20) 100| 10 a4 i New Bess 0% 6 dO 00 keto a00S ae “Tare Anais and Design of Sage Prteton System Roc Retsin [tae Toa)ao} ee ae ee ete “iese) Figure 13. Air volume curve for AIR-8 It is almost impossible forthe bladder vessel to fall and even when it falls it will behave like @ ‘compressor vessel and provides enough time to respond. In any case, a simulation was performed here the one number bladder vessel (out of two working) fall (isolated from the pipeline) but air valves working as protection to the pipeline and Figure 13a shows the pressure head variation at pump discharge for this scenario. For single vessel falure concitions, the maximum surge Pressure isin the pipeline is about 180m and minimum pressure of-0.1m, 0. -20 0 20 40 60 80 100120 140 160 18020022 Time (see) Figure 13a variation of pressure head at pump discharge mano for one Bladder vessel (ut of two recommended) fure condtons Seer _—aea — — ‘Dr Saas Lng FR. PF DRE Tan Ara nd Den oS xvnire 1RYPIPE LC Lexington, KY USA. Pro ‘cm hg [Ripa oars)0. -20 0 20 40 60 80 100120 140 160 180 20022 Time (sec) Figure 1ab variation of pressure head at around 8km for one Bladder vessel (out of two recommended) allure conditions 22 Additional Modeling Scenarios ‘While simultaneous tripping ofall ofthe operating pumps due to power outage is considered to be the worst-case scenario, it is important to verity whether the system is adequately protected against other severe transient conditions such as failure of any one of the operating pumps. Figure 14 shows the pressure envelope corresponding to tripping of any one of the four operating pumps. Figure 15 shows the pressure envelope corresponding to tripping of any two out of four ‘operating pumps, Figure 16 shows the pressure envelope corresponding to tripping of any three ‘ut of four operating pumps. It is evident from this figure that the protection provided against ‘simultaneous tripping ofall pumps will also protect the system when any one, two and thee of the four operating pumps fails, Gar wr I Talia TOI ‘Dr Sens Lingle, PD, PE FTE, DWRE | Transient Analasand Dein of Sure KyPIPE KYPIPE LLC, Lexingon KY USA. Protection System iii Ragu Ravson | [oie [SaMin and Max 500 § soo 3 cb = Bao "0 200! Distance (ken) [—Preeine ‘ener init — in Cavston x | Figure 16. Envelope of MAXIMIN transient pressures with protection fo three pump tip case while our pumps are working 23 Sensitivity analyses Results from transient modeling study are valid only ifthe data used for the model are accurate. “The two important parameters of a pipeline system that have a significant degree of uncertainty ‘and at the same time have potential o adversely affect transient resus are wave speed (or Cceletity) and pump-motor inertia, To account for uncertainties in estimatedlcomputed values for these parameters and fo ensure the adequacy of protection provided tothe system, the folowing sensitivity analysis runs were made: ‘+ Repeat transient simulation by reducing pump and motor inertia by 10%. This increases the rate at which pump speed ramps down which in tu could generate worse transient pressures. + Since wave speed employed in the baseline model is an estimated value based on pipe characteristics, the transient simulation was repeated with 10% higher wave speeds than the estimated values to ensure that potentially higher wave speeds do not result in worse transient pressures, a Eee TDWS ‘Dr. Srna ing, PAD. PE FUE, DWRE | Tvanslent Aaland Dasion of Su KYPIPE [RYPIPE LLG, Lexingon, KY USA Protteton Sytem ii Higa Ravion [04016 —[TaEFigure 17 shows the pressure envelope plots corresponding to the simuitaneous fallure of both of ‘the eperating pumps with @ 10% reduction in the combined pump and motor inertia. As evident, a 410% reduction in pump and motor inertia does not have @ significant influence on the model results, Figure 18 shows the pressure envelope with higher wave speeds. Once again, no undue high or low pressures were noted, Min and Max Figure 17. Envelope of MAXIMIN transient pressures with surge protection (Falluce ofall pumps With 2 10% reduction in combined pump and motor inertia) Min and Max Figure 18. Envelope of MAX/MIN transient pressures with surge protection with a wave speed 10% higher than the original wave speed Gero [alte TNS Dr. Siva Ungiedy Pa, PE FI DWRE YP KYPIPE LLC, Lexigion, KY USA ia‘While all ofthe previous simulations were based on the design flow rates (rougher pipe ~ low Hazen William roughness value), it is also necessary to verify the proposed design for other extreme operating conditions. The transient modeling study was repeated with a higher Hazen Wiliam roughness coefficient of 140 instead of the design value of 130, Figure 19 shows the Pressure envelope for this operating condition, As Figure 19 shows no undue high or low Pressures, the protection provided for design conditions can handle the other critical operating conditions, Min and Max Elevation (meters) [Pirstine ‘Envelope —Lower Figure 19. Envelope of MAX/MIN transient pressures for both pumps fallure (HC of 140 instead of 130) 24 Pump Startup Conditions It is also important to verily if the designed protection (against power failure events) can also Drotect the pipeline system from normal pump start up conditions. It is assumed that the pumps {are started one after the other with discharge control valve of each pump going to fully open Condition in 30 seconds. Pump-1 starts with its discharge contol valve completely closed, Discharge control valve starts opening once the pump reaches is rated speed (or almost rated speed) and opens fully in 30 seconds. During this period, the second pump starts and attains full ‘speed. Discharge control valve ofthe second pump starts opening at 30 seconds and is fully open ‘by 60 seconds. During this period, the third pump starts and attains full speed. Discharge contol valve ofthe third pump starts opening at 60 seconds and is fully open by 90 seconds, During this Period, the fourth pump starts and atains full speed. Discharge control valve ofthe fourth pump starts opening at 90 seconds and is fully open by 120 seconds. Figure 20 shows the pressure CT [Be Santina AD. PE TIE DRE | Tat Aaa Da vere VPPETcexiin KY USA otcion ac | Haein La)1.0 Introduction and Data Summary ‘The report presents results from a transient modeling and design of surge protection system study conducted on the TOWSP water supply pipeline from LMD to Mallapur Hil in Warangal District, ‘The study was conducted using the popular Surge2014 sofware developed at University of Kentucky, USA. Several thousand copies ofthis program are in culation all over the word, wth ‘almost all major pipeline design consultants in the US using this program for transmission main and distribution system protection. Figure 1 shows the schematic of pipeline system, Physical and hydraulic characteristics of the Pipeline system used for transient analysis ae Isted in the following: © Pipe diameter 2000 mm © Pipe material Mid Stee! pipe (M.S) 2 Total Length 12831 m © Pipe thickness 16mm © Pipe roughness(HWC) 130 © Wave speed {969 mvs (calculated, see Figure 1b) © Low water level(intake sump): 252.81m (foot valve level) © Level at discharge chamber: 364.301m ‘© Number of working pumps 4 duty +2 standby ‘© Rated discharge per pump: 3551.75 cummetersinr © Rated pump head 126m fo Rated speed 1440 rpm © Rated combined efficiency: 82% ‘© Pump and Motor ineria(WR*) : 1282 N-m* (calculated, see Figure ta) © Pipeline Design Discharge 14207 cum metresihr (© Check valve (non-return valve): Rapid closure type © Cavitation head 95m aie oF Easier TOW | [| br. Sivas ngrday Pb. PE, FUE, DWRE Transient Anal and Dein of Sarge KYPIPE [KYPIPE LLC, Lexingon, KY USA FeeneairinassemVenting devices (during inital filing of the pipeline) thereby reducing the overall piptine protection cost + Inclusion of surge suppressing air valves forces the study of impact of air valves provided ‘exclusively for air venting purposes as more number of alr valves andlor large orice 2- stage air valves could be detrimental othe safety ofthe pipeline. + Use of air valves as surge protecting devices ensures that the protection devices ‘spread throughout the pipeline thereby minimizing the risk of falure. On the other hand, protection based on surge tanks alone relies on protection concentrate at just one or afew locations along the pipeline. Accidental failure of surge tanks could lead to catastrophic {allure ofarge portions of the pipetine. ‘+ There are no special maintenance requirements for 3-stage air valves other than what's, ‘normally required for venting air valves and therefore does not add addtional burden tothe client 4.0 Recommendations Based on several transient modeling runs, the study recommends the use of: ‘+ 2 nos, of 16m? (260mm vessel connection and associated grld and 18 bars rated) bladder ‘vessel located near the pumping station. + 2nos, of 400mm (18 bars rated) hydraulically operated Pressure rele valves (PRV) ‘+12 0s. of 200mm (16 bars) of three-stage surge suppressing non slam air valves with ‘switch pressure of 3.0kPa. Air Valve locations: | ‘flow | Outflow | Small | Switch ame | *anaee ia | Dia | Orie | Presse (ovny_| tow | tom | (00) ama_| 7a 200 003 ‘ana_| 12001 200 003 ‘ARS | 4590 200, (003 ‘Ans [6120 200 "003 ‘a7 | 8100. 200 (003 NESS ‘ans | 10080 200 ‘002 oy wit-10 | 11040 | 278.17 | 200 003 ‘aan | 12480 | 268.08 | 200 03 | pkepge2_Lsags0 [32003 | 200 03 % 7 Ar. h KYPIPE -KVPIPE LLC, Lei lon i Ba raking Water Sup,