Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • SPM Scores

    Uploaded by

    HARSHA JHA 2235071
    8 views4 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views4 pages

    SPM Scores

    Uploaded by

    HARSHA JHA 2235071

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4
    MARKING, EVALUATING AND a distributed symmetri on pales a For practical purposes, itis convenient to consider oe Population and to group people's scores 5 le to classify a person accordi - adele ing to the score obtained as GRADE! — “intellectually superior”, if a score lies at or above th percentile for people of the same age group. ae GRADE!“ Ell “Definitely above the averoge in intellectual capacity’ f a score lies at or above the 75th percentile. (It may be designated It ifit ies at or above the 90th percentile) GRADE Ill “intellectually average”, ifa score lies between the 25th and 75th percentiles, (It may be designated as I+, fit is above the 50th percentile, and Ill, if is below it) GRADE IV. “Definitely below average in intellectual capac’, if 2 score lies at or below the 25th percentile. (It may be designated IV- if it lies at or below the |0th percentile) GRADE V__ “intellectually impaired’, if a score lies at or below the Sth percentile for that age group: The total score obtained, the consistency of an estimate, and the grade reached are conveniently summarised as in he following example Total Score 46 Discrepancies 0,+1,-2. 42-1 Grade All Time 38 minutes In order to avoid the test becoming too long or unwieldy ~ and thus to retain a test of maximum usefulness — certain compromises had to * made in 1g those — to differentiate clearly amon ment, Asa result, its ability scores was necessarily its develop yw scores an especially children - with lo. restricted. The second prob een explained, the SPM's ability to discrimi any loss in its ability to discriminate am through the development of Spm Plus. | he CPM or APM (respecte less reliable) assessment is r9 attempts to ove! ‘ome the limitations ©! d adults with high em became serious as scores increased. As has mg higher scores, without ate amor cong the les able, has been restored ‘more differentiation is required a the Jy) should be used: fa ired, APM Set | may be lower or upper end, t! f the SPM by shorter (but necessarily used on its own. Other rc

    You might also like