Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Freedom of Press in Democratic State
Freedom of Press in Democratic State
Summary
The backbone of any democracy is an independent and responsible media. Media has a solemn
responsibility or obligation to present the true state of affairs. It is like a mirror, which shows us
the bare truth and harsh realities of life. Access to media is access to public opinion, so essential to
protect democratic institutions.
INTRODUCTION
In society, millions are exposed to a variety of messages each
day. Every community consists of groups with diverse backgrounds of social
class, economic status and potential or religious affiliations. Society needs
some communication system so its various organisations may perform their
designated functions. Communication is a process of sharing or exchange of
ideas, information, knowledge, attitude or feeling among two or more persons
through certain signs and symbols.
Media came into existence in 1780 with the introduction of
a newspaper namely The Bengal Gazette and since then it has matured leaps
and bounds. Media has a solemn responsibility or obligation to present the
true situation. It has been playing a significant role in shaping human minds.
MASS MEDIA
‘Mass’ means ‘enormous numbers of people’. ‘Media’ (plural of
‘medium’) means ‘that by something is done’. ‘Mass media’ means as the
name suggests, media which reach the mass spread over a vast area
simultaneously. Any media that multiplies messages and takes it to many
people simultaneously is called ‘mass media’.
FREEDOM OF PRESS
“Freedom of Press” means absence of interference by the
state except as far as it is authorised by the constitution and by law.
Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948
provides that “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek,
receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of
frontiers”.
Lord Mansfield says, “The liberty of the press consists in printing
without any license subject to the consequences of law”. The liberty of press
means liberty to print and publish what one pleases, without earlier
permission.
In 1950, the Supreme Court in Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras
observed that freedom of the press lay at the foundation of all democratic
organisations.
Presently, the fundamental right to look for and disseminate
information through an independent press is under attack, and part of the
assault has come from an unexpected source. According to Freedom House’s in
the World data “media freedom has been deteriorating around the world over
the past decade, with few norms of repression taking hold in open societies
and, authoritarian states alike”.
FUTURE OF TRUTH
As above said, media has a solemn responsibility or
obligation to present the truth. But unexpectedly, the news media and the
government are entwined in a malicious circle of mutual manipulation,
mythmaking, and self- interest. Too often, the crises are not really crises but
not joint fabrications. The two institutions have become so ensnared in a
symbiotic wed of lies that the news media are unable to tell the public what
is true and the government is unable to govern effectively.
News media is no longer seen as an arbitrator of the ‘real
news’. Media is alleged to be echo-chamber of the dominant political class.
Thus, News Media have lost creditability due to complicit and motivated
reporting, which has become a source of fake news.
By and large, the media strive to tell the truth, but what if
the ‘truth’ as they know it consist of distorted facts? The unavoidable result
is that they repeat lies. Elected leaders in many democracies, who should
be press freedoms staunchest defenders, have made explicit attempts to
silence critical media voices and strengthen outlets that serve up favourable
coverage.
In some of the most influential democracies in the world, large
segments of the population are no longer receiving unbiased news and
information. This is not because journalists are being kept in jail, as may
occur in authoritarian settings. As a result, truth is going into dark. Some of
the main reasons for falsification are- regulatory and financial pressure,
common methods include government- backed ownership changes, and
public denunciations of honest journalists.
Some of the incidents where we can observe falsification are,
one of the articles published by Times Now is, after periodic skirmishes
between Indian and Chinese troops at the Galwan valley in Ladakh since
May, tensions between the two nations reached an all-time high in June
when clashes turned fatal with the loss of 20 Indian soldiers and an
unknown number of Chinese soldiers. Following this incident, media was
flooded with fake news around the conflict. At the height of the conflict, we
witnessed two occasions when the Indian media pit out misinformation on
China. And another example is THE EXPRESS TRIBUNE on November 13,
2022 published an article that “Indian media exposed for spreading fake
news about Pakistani’s role in IIOJK”.
Incidents of circulation of “false/fake news, a crime under the
Indian Penal Code, saw nearly a three- fold rise in 2020 over 2019,
according to the latest National Crime Records Bureau. Fake news affects
free speech and informed choices of the subjects of the country, leading to
the hijacking of democracy.
Usually, fake news is created to either influence people’s
views, push a political agenda or cause confusion. In the recent Karnataka
Assembly elections (2018) fake news about rival parties and candidates
flooded the media.
Presently, there is interference of political parties into
the legitimate activities of the media. Pressure and influence of media of
political leaders are widely used, as a result truth is being suppressed. Due
to undue influence media is not presenting clear picture of what is
happening really in this world? Therefore, people are misguided by the
coloured picture. The government must bring some measures to stop this
falsification, but government is also the part of it. So, we can’t do anything.
There is one way to regulate falsification, as if all the people in society must
get awareness about it and they must start a revolt or question the
government. Then we can put an end for this.
CONCLUSION
As we can conclude from the earlier statements, the press
has a huge responsibility on their shoulders. They need to be vigilant and
honest. And a press can easily manipulate the public’s opinion. This is why
we need responsible journalism to refrain the media from reporting false
facts which may harm the harmony and peace of a country.
REFERENCES
Media Law by Dr. S.R. MYNENI
Constitutional Law of India by Dr. J.N. PANDEY
Drishti IAS website
The Hindu News Paper
Times Now News Article
The Express Tribune News Article