Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Content Downloaded From 84.69.150.117 On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:33:51 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 84.69.150.117 On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:33:51 UTC
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/798932?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Oxford University Press and Society for the Study of Social Problems are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Problems
DAVID SUDNOW
Washington University
"revisionist" position,
county fromhas yielded
which the following mate-
several fruitful products, the
rial is drawn, over latter
80 per cent of all
stance (commonlycases identified with
"never go to trial." To describe
what is rather loosely
the methodknown
of obtainingas theplea
a guilty
"labelling" perspective),
disposition, has
essentialbeen on
for the discussion
the whole more promissory
to follow, I mustthan
distinguishpro-between
ductive, more programmatic than
what shall be termed "necessarily-in-
cluded-lesser-offenses"
empirical. The present report will and "situation-
ex-
amine the operations of a Public De-
ally-included-lesser-offenses." Of two
fender system in an effort
offenses toin assess
designated the penal code,
the warrant for the continued theoret- the lesser is considered to be that for
ical and empirical development of which the length of required incarcera-
the position argued by Kitsuse and tion is the shorter period of time. In-
Cicourel. It will address the question: clusion refers to the relation between
what of import for the sociological two or more offenses. The "necessarily-
analysis of legal administration can be included-lesser-offense" is a strictly
learned by describing the actual way legal notion:
the penal code is employed in the Whether a lesser offense is included in
daily activities of legal representation ? the crime charged is a question of law to
First, I shall consider the "guilty plea" be determined solely from the definition
as a way of handling criminal cases, and corpus delicti of the offense charged
focusing on some features of the penal and of the lesser offense. ... If all the
elements of the corpus delicti of a lesser
code as a description of a population crime can be found in a list of all the
of defendants. Then I shall describe elements of the offense charged, then
the Public Defender operation with
only is the lesser included in the greater.4
special attention to the way defendants
Stated alternatively:
are represented. The place of the
The test in this state of necessarily in-
guilty plea and penal code in this
cluded offenses is simply that where an
representation will be examined.offense cannot be committed without
necessarily committing another offense,
Lastly, I shall briefly analyze the fash-
the latter is a necessarily included of-
ion in which the Public Defender pre-
fense.5
pares and conducts a "'defense." The
The implied negative is put: could
latter section will attempt to indicate
Smith have committed A and not B?
the connection between certain prom-
inent organizational features of If the answer is yes, then B is not
the
necessarily included in A. If the an-
Public Defender system and the penal
code's place in the routine operation
swer is no, B is necessarily included.
of that system. While in a given case a battery might
be committed in the course of a rob-
GUILTY PLEAS, INCLUSION, ANDbery, battery is not necessarily inclu-
NORMAL CRIMES
ded in robbery. Petty theft is neces-
It is a commonly noted fact about sarily included in robbery but not in
the criminal court system generally, burglary. Burglary primarily involves
that the greatest proportion of cases the "intent" to acquire another's goods
are "settled" by a guilty plea.s In the P.S. Also, M. Schwartz, Cases and Ma-
terials on Professional Responsibility and
Harold Garfinkel, can be found in the the Administration of Criminal Justice, San
recent critical article by J. I. Kitsuse and
Francisco: Matthew Bender and Co., 1961,
A. V. Cicourel, "A Note on the Official esp. pp. 79-105.
Use of Statistics," Social Problems, Vol. 4 C. W. Fricke, California Criminal
11, No. 2 (Fall, 1963) pp. 131-139. Law, Los Angeles: The Legal Book Store,
3 See D. J. Newman, "Pleading Guilty 1961, p. 41.
for Considerations," 46 J. Crim. L. C. and 5 People v. Greer, 30 Cal. 2d, 589.
wouldif
suitable reduction, describe
the the transformation
instantbe- case
involves a "burglary,"
tween the burglaryreference
cases statutorily de- is
scribed and the reductions
not made to the statutory definition routinely of
"burglary." To decide what
made (i.e., to "petty theft"). the
The rule sit-
mustoffenses
uationally included be sought elsewhere, areinin the the
instant case, the instant
character case defined
of the non-statutorily is not
class of "burglaries,"referable
analyzed as a statutorily which I shall
course of action; term
rather, reference is
normal burglaries.
made to a non-statutorily conceived
NORMAL CRIMES
class "burglary" and offenses that are
In the course
typically situationally of routinely
included inen-it,
taken as a class of behavioral events. countering persons charged with
Stated again: in searching an instant "petty theft," "burglary," "assault
case to decide what to reduce it to,with a deadly weapon," "rape," "pos-
there is no analysis of the statutorilysession of marijuana," etc., the P.D.
referable elements of the instant case;gains knowledge of the typical manner
instead, its membership in a class of in which offenses of given classes are
events, the features of which cannot committed, the social characteristics of
be described by the penal code, must the persons who regularly commit
be decided. An example will be use-them, the features of the settings in
ful. If a defendant is charged with which they occur, the types of victims
burglary and the P.D. is concerned tooften involved, and the like. He learns
to speak knowledgeably of "burglars,"
propose a reduction to a lesser offense,
"petty thieves," "drunks," "rapists,"
he might search the elements of the
burglary at hand to decide what other "narcos," etc., and to attribute to them
offenses were committed. The other personal biographies, modes of usual
offenses he might "discover" would be criminal activity, criminal histories,
of two sorts: those necessarily and psychological characteristics, and so-
those situationally included. In attemp- cial backgrounds. The following char-
ting to decide those other offenses acterizations are illustrative:
situationally included in the instant Most ADWs (assault with deadly wea-
event, the instant event might be pon) start with fights over some girl.
analyzed as a statutorily referable These sex fiends (child molestation
course of action. Or, as is the case cases) usually hang around parks or
schoolyards. But we often get fathers
with the P.D., the instant case might charged with these crimes. Usually the
be analyzed to decide if it is a "bur- old man is out of work and stays at
glary" in common with other "bur- home when the wife goes to work and
glaries" conceived of in terms other he plays around with his little daughter
or something. A lot of these cases start
than those provided by the statute. when there is some marital trouble and
Burglaries are routinely reduced to the woman gets mad.
petty theft. If we were to analyze the I don't know why most of them don't
way burglaries typically occur, petty rob the big stores. They usually break
theft is neither situationally or neces- into some cheap department store and
steal some crummy item like a $9.95
sarily included; when a burglary is record player you know.
committed, money or other goods are
seldom illegally removed from some Kids who start taking this stuff (nar-
cotics) usually start out when some
person's body. If we therefore ana- buddy gives them a cigarette and they
lyzed burglaries, employing the penal smoke it for kicks. For some reason they
code as our reference, and then always get caught in their cars, for
searched the P.D.'s records to see how speeding or something.
actual offenses could thus be nonethe- urban places, a public defender occu-
less reduced to "loitering" if, as kinds pying a place alongside judge and
of social activity, "loitering," con- prosecutor as a regular court employee.
ceived of as typifying a way of life, In the county studied, the P.D. mans a
pattern of daily activity, social psy- daily station, like the public prose-
chological circumstances, etc., charac- cutor, and "defends" all who come
terized the conduct of the defendant. before him. He appears in court when
The young P.D. who would object court begins and his "clientele," com-
"You can't reduce it to 'loitering'-he posed without regard for his prefer-
didn't really 'loiter,' " would be repri- ences, consists of that residual category
manded: "Fella, you don't know how of persons who cannot afford to bring
to use that term; he might as well have their own spokesmen to court. In this
'loitered'-it's the same kind of case county, the "residual" category ap-
as the others." proximates 65 per cent of the total
Having outlined the formal me- number of criminal cases. In a given
chanics of the guilty plea disposition, year, the twelve attorneys who com-
I shall now turn to depict the routine prise the P.D. Office "represent" about
of representation that the categories 3,000 defendants in the municipal and
of crime, imbued with elaborate superior courts of the county.
knowledge of the delinquent social While the courtroom encounters of
structure, provide for. This will entail private attorneys are brief, businesslike
a brief examination of pertinent organ- and circumscribed, interactionally and
izational features of the P.D. system. temporally, by the particular cases that
bring them there, the P.D. attends to
PUBLIC "DEFENSE"
the courtroom as his regular work
Recently, in many communities, the
place and conveys in his demeanor his
burden of securing counsel hasplace beenas a member of its core personnel.
taken from the defendant.6 As the While private attorneys come and
accused is, by law, entitled to the aid leave court with their clients (who
of counsel, and as his pocketbook isare generally "on bail"), the P.D.
often empty, numerous cities have feltarrives in court each morning at nine,
obliged to establish a public defender takes his station at the defense table,
system. There has been little resistanceand deposits there the batch of files
to this development by private attorneysthat he will refer to during the day.
among whom it is widely felt that theWhen, during morning "calendar,"8 a
less time they need spend in the crimi-private attorney's case is called, the
nal courts, where practice is least P.D. steps back from the defense table,
prestigeful and lucrative, the better.7leaving his belongings in place there,
Whatever the reasons for its de- and temporarily relinquishes his station.
velopment, we now find, in many No private attorney has enough de-
6 For general histories of indigent de- fendants in a given court on a given
fender systems in the United States, see day to claim a right to make a desk
The Association of the Bar of the City of of the defense table. If the P.D. needs
New York, Equal Justice for the Accused, some information from his central of-
Garden City, New York: 1959; and E. A.
Brownell, Legal Aid in the United States, fice, he uses the clerk's telephone, a
Rochester, New York: The Lawyers Co- privilege that few private lawyers feel
operative Publishing Company, 1951. at home enough to take. In the course
7 The experience of the Public Defender
system is distinctly different in this regard 8 "Calendar part" consists of that
from that of the Legal Aid Societies, which, portion of the court day, typically in the
I am told, have continually met very strong mornings, when all matters other than trials
opposition to their establishment by local are heard, e.g., arraignments, motions, con-
bar associations. tinuances, sentencing, probation reports, etc.
rooma
of calendar work, to courtroom
lawyer throughout
willtheoften
course
have occasion to of their proceedings
request (both
a delay o
"continuance" offrom
several days
municipal to superior until th
courtrooms
for client's
next stage of his felony cases, and proceedings
from one muni-
The private attorney
cipal courtroom toaddresses
another when there th
prosecutor via isthe judge
a specialization to
of courts, e.g., reques
jury,
such an alteration;
non-jury,the P.D.
arraignment, etc.), talks
the P.D. di
rectly over to the D.A.:
sees defendants only at those places
Private attorney: in
"Iftheir paths prosecutor
the when they appear infinds
the courtHonor,
it convenient your he is manning.myA givenclient
de-
would prefer tofendant
have mayhis preliminary
be "represented" by one
hearing on Monday, the 24th."
P.D. at arraignment, another at pre-
Judge: "Is that date suitable to the dis-
trict attorney?" liminary hearing, a third at trial and a
Prosecutor: "Yes, fourth
your whenhonor."
sentenced.
At "Thank
Private attorney: the first interviewyou,
with a clientyour
Honor."
(initial interviews occur in the jail
Public Defender: "Bob (D.A.), how where attorneys go, en masse, to "pick
about moving Smith's prelim up toup new defendants" in the afternoons)
the 16th ?"
a file is prepared on the defendant.
Prosecutor: "Well, Jim, we've got Jones
on that afternoon." In each file is recorded the charge
Public Defender: "Let's see, how's the brought against the defendant and,
22nd?"
among other things, his next court
Prosecutor: "That's fine, Jim, the 22nd."
date. Each evening attorneys return
new files to the central office where
If, during the course of a proceeding,
secretaries prepare court books for
the P.D. has some minor matter to
each courtroom that list the defendants
tend to with the D.A., he uses the
time when a private attorney is due
ad- to appear in a given court on a
dressing the bench to walk overgiven
to day. In the mornings, attorneys
the prosecutor's table and whisper take
his the court books from the office
and remove from the central file the
requests, suggestions or questions. The
files of those defendants due to ap-
P.D. uses the prosecutor's master calen-
dar to check on an upcoming court pear in "their court" that day.
date; so does the D.A. with the P.D.'s.There is little communication be-
The D.A. and P.D. are on a first name tween P.D. and client. After the first
basis and throughout the course ofinterview,
a the defendant's encounters
with the P.D. are primarily in court.
routine day interact as a team of co-
workers. Only under special circumstances (to
While the central focus of the pri- be discussed below) are there contacts
vate attorney's attention is his client, between lawyers and defendants in the
the courtroom and affairs of court jail before and after appearances in
constitute the locus of involvements court. The bulk of "preparation for
for the P.D. The public defender and court" (either trials or non-trial
public prosecutor, each representativesmatters) occurs at the first interview.
of their respective offices, jointlyThe attorney on station, the "attending
handle the greatest bulk of the court'sattorney," is thus a stranger to "his
daily activity. client," and vice versa. Over the course
The P.D. office, rather than assign of his proceedings, a defendant will
its attorneys to clients, employs the have several attorneys (in one instance
arrangement of stationing attorneys in a man was "represented" by eight
different courts to "represent" all those P.D.'s on a charge of simple assault).
who come before that station. As de- Defendants who come to court find a
fendants are moved about from court- lawyer they don't know conducting
was a plain clothes man. They (or with a view toward undermining
told us to get out of the car and
then they searched me and then
the assignment of a designation in an
my friend. Then this guy without anticipated trial). In the 288 instance,
the uniform he looked over into the P.D. interrupted when he had
the car and picked up this thing
enough information to confirm his
from the back floor and said some-
thing to the other one. Then he sense of the case's typicality and con-
struct a typifying portrayal of the
asked me if I had any more of the
present defendant. The character of
stuff and I said I didn't know
what he was talking about.the
So he
information supplied by the de-
wrote something down on a piece
fendant was such that it was specifi-
of paper and made me sign it.
Then he told my friend to go cally lacking detail about the particular
home and they took me down here occurrences, e.g., the time, place, what
to the station and booked me on
was said to the girl, what precisely
possession of marijuana. I swear I the defendant do or not do, his
did
didn't have no marijuana.
P.D.: You told me you were convicted "state of mind," etc. The defendant's
of possession in 1959. appearance and prior record (in this
Def.: Yeah, but I haven't touched any case
of the defendant was a fifty-five year
the stuff since then. I don't know
what it was doing in my car, butold white, unemployed, unskilled
I haven't touched the stuff since laborer, with about ten prior drunk
that last time. arrests, seven convictions, and two
P.D.: You ought to know it doesn't prior sex offense violations) was relied
make any difference whether or
not they catch you using, just soupon to provide the sense of the
as they find it on your possessionpresent occasion. The P.D. straight-
or in a car, or your house, or forwardly approached the D.A. and
something. arranged for a "contributing to the
Def.: Man, I swear I don't know how it
got there. Somebody must have delinquency of a minor" reduction. In
planted it there. the burglary case, the question, "Had
P.D.: Look, you know as well as I do you ever been there before ?", was
that with your prior conviction intended to elicit what was received,
and this charge now that you
could go away from here for five e.g., that the place was a familiar one
years or so. So just calm down a to the defendant. Knowing that the
minute and let's look at this thing place was in the defendant's neigh-
reasonably. If you go to trial and borhood establishes its character as a
lose the trial, you're stuck. You'll
be in the joint until you're 28
skid row area business; that the First
years old. If you plead to this oneFederal Bank was not entered has been
charge without the priors then weconfirmed. "What were you going
can get you into jail maybe, or aafter ?", also irrelevant to the 459 sec-
year or two at the most in the
joint. If you wait until the pre- tion of the penal code, provides him
liminary hearing and then they with information that there was no
charge the priors, boy you've had special motive for entering this estab-
it, its too late.
lishment. The question, Was anyone
Def.: Well how about a trial?
with you ?", when answered negatively,
(After ten minutes, the defendant
decided to plead guilty to one placed the event in the typical class of
charge of possession, before the "burglaries" as solitary, non-coordi-
date of the preliminary hearing) nated activities. The remaining ques-
Let us consider, in light of thetions were directed as well to confirm-
previous discussion, some of the fea- ing the typical character of the event,
tures of these interviews. and the adequacy of the defendant's
1. In each case the information account is not decided by whether or
not
sought is not "data" for organizing the P.D. can now decide whether
the
particular facts of the case forthe
de-
statutory definition of the contem-
plated reduction or the original charge
ciding proper penal code designations
and allowabletransported
by tothe D.A.
the state and county The
are normal crimes committed
penal institutions. To confront a
"stubborn" defendants. "criminal" is, for D.A. and P.D., no
So-called "stubborn" defendants will special experience, nothing to tell their
be distinguished from a second class wives about, nothing to record as out-
of offenders, those who commit crimes standing in the happenings of the day.
which are atypical in their character Before "their court" scores of "crimi-
(for this community, at this time, etc.) nals" pass each day.
or who commit crimes which while
The morality of the courts is taken
typical (recurrent for this community,
for granted. The P.D. assumes that the
this time, etc.) are committed atypi-
D.A., the police, judge, the narcotics
cally. The manner in which the P.D.
agents and others all conduct their
and D.A. must conduct the representa-
business as it must be conducted and
tion and prosecution of these de- in a proper fashion. That the police
fendants is radically different. To
may hide out to deceive petty violators;
characterize the special problems thethat narcotics agents may regularly em-
P.D. has with each class of defendants,
ploy illicit entrapment procedures to
it is first necessary to point outfind
a suspects; that investigators may
general feature of the P.D.'s orienta-
routinely arrest suspects before they
tion to the work of the courts that has
have sufficient grounds and only later
hitherto not been made explicit. This
uncover warrantable evidence for a
orientation will be merely sketched
formal booking; that the police may
here.
beat suspects; that judges may be
As we noticed, the defendant's guilt "tough" because they are looking to
is not attended to. That is to say, the support for higher office elections; that
presupposition of guilt, as a presup- some laws may be specifically preju-
position, does not say "You are guilty" dicial against certain classes of persons
with a pointing accusatory finger, but -whatever may be the actual course
"You are guilty, you know it, I know of charging and convicting defendants
it, so let's get down to the business of -all of this is taken, as one P.D. put
deciding what to do with you." When it, "as part of the system and the way
a defendant agrees to plead guilty, he it has to be." And the P.D. is part of
is not admitting his guilt; when asked the team.
to plead guilty, he is not being asked, While it is common to overhear
"Come on, admit it, you know you private attorneys call judges "bastards,"
were wrong," but rather, "Why don't policemen "hoodlums" and prosecutors
you be sensible about this thing ?" "sadists," the P.D., in the presence of
What is sought is not a confession, but such talk, remains silent. When the
reasonableness. P.D. "loses" a case-and we shall see
The presupposition of guilt as a that losing is an adequate description
way of attending to the treatment of only for some circumstances-he is
defendants has its counterpart in the likely to say "I knew he couldn't win."
way the P.D. attends to the entire Private attorneys, on the other hand,
court process, prosecuting machinery, will not hesitate to remark, as one did
law enforcement techniques, and the in a recent case, "You haven't got a
community. fucking chance in front of that son-of-
For P.D. and D.A. it is a routinely a-bitch dictator." In the P.D. office,
there is a total absence of such con-
encountered phenomenon that persons
demnation.
in the community regularly commit
criminal offenses, are regularly brought The P.D. takes it for granted and
before the courts, and are regularly attends to the courts in accord with
for so long." One P.D. feels that wire- Possibly the DA in Sup/Ct could be
persuaded into cutting her loose if she
tapping would be a useful adjunct totook the 211 and one of the narco counts.
police procedure. It is generally said, If not, the Def, who is somewhat recal-
citrant and stubborn, will probably de-
by everyone in the office, that ".. mand a JT (jury trial).
is one of the best cities in the state
when it comes to police." The routine trial, generated as it is
In the P.D.'s interviews, the de- by the defendant's refusal to make a
fendant's guilt only becomes a topiclesser plea, is the "defendant's fault":
when the defendant himself attempts
to direct attention to his innocence. What the hell are we supposed to do
with them. If they can't listen to good
Such attempts are never taken seriously reason and take a bargain, then it's their
by the P.D. but are seen as "innocent tough luck. If they go to prison, well,
they're the ones who are losing the trials,
pitches," as "being wise," as "not not us.
knowing what is good for him." De-
fendants who make "innocent pitches" When the P.D. enters the courtroom,
often find themselves able to convince he takes it that he is going to lose,
the P.D. to have trials. The P.D. is in e.g., the defendant is going to prison.
a professional and organizational bind When he "prepares" for trial, he
in that he requires that his "clients" doesn't prepare to "win." There is no
agree with whatever action he takesattention given to "how am I going
"on their behalf": to construct a defense in order that I
Can you imagine what might happen if can get this defendant free of the
we went straight to the D.A. with a deal changes against him." In fact, he
to which the client later refused to doesn't "prepare for trial" in any
agree? Can you see him in court scream-
"ordinary" sense (I use the term ordi-
ing how the P.D. sold him out? As it is,
we get plenty of letters purportingnary
to with hesitation; what preparation
show why we don't do our job. Judges for trial might in fact involve with
are swamped with letters condemning other
the than P.D. lawyers has not, to
P.D. Plenty of appeals get started this
my knowledge, been investigated.)
way.
For the P.D., "preparation for trial"
Some defendants don't buy the offer involves, essentially, learning what
"burglary cases" are like, what "rape
of less time as constituting sufficient
cases" are like, what "assaults" are
grounds for avoiding a trial. To others,
it appears that "copping out" is worselike. The P.D.'s main concern is to
than having a trial regardless of conduct
the his part of the proceedings
in accord with complete respect for
consequences for the length of sentence.
The following remarks, taken from
proper legal procedure. He raises ob-
the Negro in . of
. the instant case are "discovered"
. maybe you would
have cases like this in
over the your
course courts.
of hearing them in
(after sentencecourt.
was pronounced)
In this regard, the "information" Yo
honor, I just would like
that "comes to
out" is say
often as new one
to thi
-that I've never heard or seen such a
him
display of injustice as I've seen here inas to the jury.
Employing a common sense con-
this court today. It's a sad commentary
on the state of our community if people
ception of what criminal lawyers
like yourself pay more attention to the like in cross examination and
behave
local political machines than to the lives
argument, and the popular portrayal
of our defendants. I think you are guilty
of that, your Honor. of their demeanor and style of ad-
dressing adversary witnesses, the on-
(At this last statement, one of the
P.D.s who was in the courtroom
looker comes away with the sense of
having witnessed not a trial at all,
turned to me and said, "He sure is
but a set of motions, a perfunctorily
looking for a contempt charge").
carried off event. A sociological analy-
The P.D. knows how to conduct his
sis of this sense would require a
trials because he knows how to con-
systematic attempt to describe the
duct "assault with deadly weapons"
features of adversary trial conduct.
trials, "burglary" trials, "rape" trials,
and the rest. The corpus delicti here A NOTE ON SPECIAL CASES
provides him with a basis for asking To conduct trials with "stubborn"
"proper questions," making thedefendants, so-called, is no special
"proper" cross examinations, and
trouble. Here trials are viewed as a
pointing out the "proper" things to
"waste of time." Murders, embezzle-
jurors about "reasonable doubt." He
ments, multiple rape cases (several de-
need not extensively gather infor-fendants with one victim), large scale
mation about the specific facts of the
robberies, dope ring operations, those
instant case. Whatever is needed in the
cases that arouse public attention and
way of "facts of the case" arise in receive special notice in the papers-
the course of the D.A.'s presentation. these are cases whose normal features
He employs the "strategy" of directing are not constructed and for which,
the same questions to the witness as even were a guilty plea available, both
were put by the D.A. with added em- parties feel uncomfortably obliged to
phasis on the question mark, or an bring issues of moral character into
inserted "Did you really see .. .?" the courtroom. The privacy of the
His "defense" consists of attempting P.D.-D.A. conviction machinery
to "bring out" slightly variant aspects through the use of the guilty plea
of the D.A.'s story by questioning his can no longer be preserved. Only
own witnesses (whom he seldom inter- "normal defendants" are accorded this
views before beginning trial but who privacy. The pressure for a public
are interviewed by the Office's two hearing, in the sense of "bringing the
"investigators") and the defendant. public in to see and monitor the char-
With little variation the same ques- acter of the proceedings," must be
tions are put to all defendants charged allowed to culminate in a full blown
with the same crimes. The P.D. learns jury trial. There is a general preference
with experience what to expect as the in the P.D. office to handle routine cases
"facts of the case." These facts, in without a jury, if it must go to trial
their general structure, portray social at all. In the special case the jury must
circumstances that he can anticipatebe employed and with them a large
by virtue of his knowledge of the audience of onlookers, newspaper men,
normal features of offense categories and daily paper coverage must be
and types of offenders. The "details" tolerated.
of providing "defense" to
chosen as an example only.indigent
It may well
persons describedbe above
that, in certain forms of
is not legal
repre-
sentative of criminal defense work work, the penal code as a statutory
generally. How the penal code is em-document is accorded a much different
and more "rigorous" scrutiny. The
ployed, i.e., how behaviors are scru-
tinized under its jurisdiction and dis-legalistic character of some criminal
pensations made via operations per- prosecutions leads one to suspect that
the "letter of the law" might constitute
formed on its categories, in other kinds
of legal establishments, has not beena key reference point in preparing for a
investigated here. The present case, criminal defense, aiming for acquittal,
albeit apparently specialized, was or changing a statutory regulation.