Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Austral) Cementation of Gold From Bromide Solutions
(Austral) Cementation of Gold From Bromide Solutions
Author:
Armoo, Kwesi Buah-Mensah
Publication Date:
1994
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/5912
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/
Link to license to see what you are allowed to do with this resource.
SCHOOL OF MINES
A Thesis by
Submitted in fulfilment
of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
October, 1994
ii
CANDIDATE'S CERTIFICATE
I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by
another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for
the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of
higher learning, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text.
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN
ALITY
(Signed)
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am highly indebted to my supervisor, Dr. Tam Tran, the Director of the Centre
for Minerals Engineering, U.N.S.W., for suggesting this thesis topic and his
invaluable guidance throughout this study.
My sincere thanks are also due to Dr. P. Wong, Ms Viera Piegerova, Fred Scott,
John Buddon and John Sharp, all of the School of Materials Science and
Engineering, U.N.S.W., for their help at various stages of this research study.
Mr. Steve Rayner (Metcon Pty Ltd.), Ms. 1k Ling Lau, Mr. J.K. Song, and the
staff of the Centre for Minerals Engineering also deserve many thanks for their
encouragement and assistance in diverse ways. My sincere acknowledgements
are also due to Hong Dy Hsu, Javad Koleini, Basil Marasinghe, Raghvendra
Desai and Glen Noble (postgraduate students) of the Centre for Minerals
Engineering for their support and assistance while completing this thesis.
I am also grateful to the following: Mrs Kate Davis, Paul and Dorcas Appiah,
Napoleon and Gina Obi1i-Asare, Joseph and Felicia Boateng, Louis and Gladys
Owusu-Mensah, Edmund and Winifred Aikins, Joseph and Catherine Afful,
Judy Burgess and all friends for their concern, encouragement and prayerful
support throughout this study and my stay in Sydney. My thanks also to my
parents, brothers and sisters for their moral supp01t.
Finally I would like to thank the Almighty God for seeing me through my stay
and study in Australia.
iv
ABSTRACT
Evans diagrams constructed from the current-potential curves of the two half-
cells showed that the cementation process is controlled by the diffusion of the
V
Au(ill) bromide ions to the zinc surface. The Au(ill) bromide/Zn (rotating-disc)
cementation reaction was found to follow two-stage first-order kinetics for most
conditions as observed for most cementation reactions. The initial reaction rate
constants corresponded to expected (or predicted) magnitude of the limiting
mass-transfer coefficients (from electrochemical measurements). The
experimental activation energies were 2.50 kcal/mol (10.50 kJ/mol) and 3.13
kcal/mol (13.12 kJ/mol) for the initial and enhanced periods respectively. The
kinetics of the Au(ill) bromide cementation using suspended zinc particles
supported the analysis of the reaction kinetics under zinc rotating-disc geometry
and from polarization measurements at the different conditions. The reaction
velocity constants also exhibited strong dependence on the inverse of particle
diameter and the square-root of stirring speed.
A change in the surface roughness of the reacting zinc surface and hence in the
effective deposition smface area as a result of modification to the deposit
morphology for the different experimental conditions was found to be the major
reason for variations in the reaction rate/velocity. For most conditions, the
deposits were bulbous/botryoidal crystal masses (for low initial gold
concentrations) and dendritic structures (for high initial gold concentrations) of
different degrees of texture and size.
vi
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
1. Armoo, K., Oo, M.T. and Tran, T., Application of cementation for precious
metal recovery, DITAC Workshop on New Developments in electrodes,
University of Wollongong, (Feb.1990).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT 111
ABSTRACT IV
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS VI
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER TWO
GENERAL & THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF
BROMINE, ZINC AND GOLD.
2-1 Bromine 4
2.1.1 General Chemistry/Properties 4
2-1-2 Thermodynamics 5
2-1-2-1 Speciation/aqueous solution 7
2-1-2-2 Eh (potential) - pH relationship 11
2-1-2-2-1 Bromine - water system 11
2-1-3 Toxicity 14
2-2 Zinc 14
2-2-1 General Chemistry/Properties 14
2-2-2 Thermodynamics 16
2-2-2-1 Speciation/aqueous solutions 16
2-2-2-2 Bromide species of zinc 20
2-2-2-3 Eh (potential) - pH relationship 21
2-2-2-3-1 Zinc - water system 21
2-3 Gold 22
2-3-1 General Chemistry/Properties 22
2-3-2 Thermodynamics 23
viii
CHAPTER THREE
HYDROMETALLURGY OF GOLD
CHAPTER FOUR
ELECTROCHEMISTRY 88
CHAPTER FIVE
CEMENTATION
CHAPTER SIX
SUMMARY OF LITERA TORE REVIEW AND
RESTATEMENT OF AIMS 137
CHAPTER SEVEN
THERMODYNAMIC STUDY
CHAPTER EIGHT
ELECTROCHEMICAL STUDY
CHAPTER NINE
CEMENTATION STUDIES
CHAPTER TEN
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
REFERENCES 287
APPENDICES 316
xiv
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter Two
Chapter Three
Chapter Four
Chapter Five
Chapter Seven
Chapter Eight
Chapter Nine
Figure (9-3.12) Zinc dissolution rate versus time for (i) 10 mg/1
(ii) 20 mg/1 (iii)50 mg/1 (iv) 100 mg/1 Au(l11)
bromide solution containing 0.10 M NaBr at
20°C, pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm. 225
Figures (9-3 .17 a-e) Scanning electron micrographs showing the effect of
NaBr concentration on Au(l11) bromide/Zn cementation
(10 mg/1 Au(III), 9.8 mg/1 Br2 (aq), 20°C, pH:5.00,
1000 rpm); (a) 0.001 M (b) 0.010 M (c) 0.050 M
(d) 0.100 M (e) 0.500 M. 242
Figures (9-3 .18a-d) Scanning electron micro graphs showing the effect of
NaBr concentration on Au(l11) bromide/Zn cementation
(100 mg/1 Au(III), 98 mg/1 Br2 (aq), 20°C, pH:5.00,
1000 rpm); (a) 0.01 M (b) 0.05 M (c) 0.10 M
(d) 0.50 M. 245
Figure (9-4.22b) Plots of l -(r/r0 ) 3 versus time for 100 mg/I Au(l11)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr (98 mg/I Br2 (aq)), at 20°C, pH:5.00,
500 rpm and (i) 38x45 µm (ii) 45x63 µm
(iii) 63x 106 µm zinc particle size ranges. 276
xxxii
Figure (9-4.23b) Plots of l -(2/3)a-(l-a) 213 versus time for 100 mg/I
Au(III) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation
in 0.10 M NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I) at 20°C, pH:5.00,
500 rpm and (i) 38x45 µm (ii) 45x63 µm
(iii) 63x 106 µm zinc particle size range. 277
xxxiii
LIST OF TABLES
Chapter Two
Chapter Three
Chapter Four
Chapter Five
Chapter Eight
Chapter Nine
LIST OFAPPENDICES
Appendix (8-4.3) Evans diagram for the reduction for (a) 10 mg/I
Au(III) bromide ions and (b) 100 mg/I bromide
ions and Zinc dissolution in 0.10 M NaBr
at 20°c, pH:5.00, and 1000 rpm. 334
INTRODUCTION
Cyanidation using cyanide and air has been widely used to extract gold from its
ores and concentrates for over one hundred years, and still remains the
overwhelming option. This has been reflected in simplicity of its application,
high pH, well defined complexation chemistry and small reagent addition,
making it generally effective in treating a wide range of ores at relatively low
cost.
In addition, it is not a suitable technique for ores and concentrates that are
considered refractory. Host minerals like pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite,
pyrrhotite, galena and other lead minerals which are ubiquitous in primary ores
tend to react and consume excessive cyanide during leaching or exhibit poor
dissolution rates. Carbonaceous gold ores generally contain naturally active
carbon which adsorbs dissolved gold during cyanidation. In some other ores of
this type, the gold is chemically combined with the organic matter and requires
pre-oxidation before leaching. A few ores containing gold telluride minerals are
also resistant to cyanidation. Also, leaching rates with alkaline cyanide solutions
are generally low (with contact times of more than 24 hours) especially with
gold concentrates. For these applications, a faster leaching system is required.
The halides in particular offer special properties for the processing of gold ores
and concentrates and recent significant advances claim a lot of potential benefits
for the halogens/halides couple over cyanide/air. Chlorine, bromine, iodine and
the respective salts have all been suggested their applications in various niche
processes and form both Au(I) and Au(ill) complexes with gold depending on
the solution chemistry conditions. In aqueous solutions, the stability of the gold-
halide complexes increases in the order Cl-< Br- < 1- which shows a preference
for gold to bond with large polarizable ligands. The bromine-bromide system
has evolved to be the most reactive and extract gold significantly faster than
cyanide-air. Its adaptability to a wide range of pH values, low toxicity and the
reasonably known bromine chemistry represent a competitive technique for gold
extraction. The development of several and improved bromine-bromide systems
has therefore been topical among many researchers. These advances have also
identified the different recovery techniques (zinc and aluminium precipitation,
carbon adsorption/electrowinning, ion-exchange, solvent extraction) for
recovering gold from the pregnant bromide-leach liquors.
In gold metallurgy, the two most popular techniques for recovering gold from
the solutions obtained after extraction have been by zinc cementation and
carbon adsorption/electrowinning. Zinc cementation grew out of the same
fashion as the development of cyanidation and in its common form, the Merrill-
Crowe process, by far the oldest method for recovering gold from cyanide
solutions. The process has therefore been widely used in the industry. The
remarkable versatility of the zinc cementation as a recovery technique seems to
be outstripped with the advent of the carbon adsorption/electrowinning for gold
extraction and recovery. However, it still accounts for a significant portion of
gold recovery in South Africa, Canada, United States of Ame1ica and some parts
of South America and is applied widely around the world as an alternative to
electrowinning. It is particularly advantageous for gold plants employing non-
agitation leaching methods in the treatment of low-grade ores. In milling
systems, it is prefen-ed to carbon adsorption for treating leach solutions
containing significant amount of silver and for small operations in which gold
recoveries cannot justify the relatively high cost of carbon elution and
reactivation equipment.
In the case of the bromine-bromide system, the only recovery techniques that
have been considered in parallel with its fundamental study are the carbon
adsorption and the ion-exchange methods. Typically, these are likely to be
3
unsuitable for the entire gold recovery. The gold precipitated on activated
carbon or resin is, however, in a metallic form hence abrasion can cause
significant losses. Competitive adsorption of bromine species may limit carbon
or resins loadings. Nevertheless, electrowinning or electrolysis might not also be
suitable as the presence of bro~ine will offset the current efficiency of the
operation and cause cell hardware problems such as anode corrosion and cell
distortion.
Invariably, zinc cementation has been identified to be highly efficient with gold
recoveries up to 99.5 percent. Hence, it is highly imperative that a fundamental
study of the zinc cementation process is carried out to reveal the kinetics and
mechanism of the process to enable a complete assessment of the bromine-
bromide system as an alternative to cyanidation. The precursor to the zinc
cementation technique is its electrochemical nature which allows for its
application, understanding and determination of the characteristics of the
reaction. Accurate data on the kinetics and mechanism of the reaction can be
obtained from electrochemical measurements.
(2) Determine the factors controlling the zinc cementation process with the aim
to optimise the conditions for gold recovery.
(3) Determine the kinetics (reaction rates) of the gold reduction and the zinc
oxidation.
(4) Determine the mechanism of the reaction and the factors controlling the rate
determining steps.
(5) Identify the predominant species m the reaction to reveal the various
equilibria governing the recovery process.
CHAPTER TWO
2-1 BROMINE
The element bromine belongs to the group of halogens (meaning "salt former")
comprising of fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine and the very rare radioactive
element, Astatine, and which collectively constitute the fluorine family (Group
VII) of the periodic table.
In nature, it appears in the form of bromide salts. Aqueous salts are found in the
sea, rivers, lakes, wells and springs. The concentrations can vary from a few
parts per billion to a few parts per thousand. The greater part of bromine is
5
found as a trace level in the rocks which comprise the earth crust. (Neufeld,
1936; Jolles, 1966). Bromine is generally manufactured from bromide in sea
water, with chlorine as the oxidizing agent. The sea water is first acidified to
pH:3.5 with hydrochloric and sulphuric acid to prevent disproportionation of the
bromine to be formed, and then a slight stoichiometric excess of chlorine is
passed through the solution to oxidise the bromide ions to bromine. The
bromine formed is swept out with a current of air and led into a basic solution
(NaOH), where it disproportionates into bromide and bromate ions. When the
concentration of bromine in this solution is sufficiently high, the solution is
acidified to recover the elemental bromine.
2-1-2 Thermodynamics
The most common oxidation state of bromine is -1. In addition, there are known
in the presence of strong electrophilic anions (eg. oxygen), many de1ivatives in
which positive oxidation states of + 1, +3, +5 or +7 are associated with the
bromine atom. Some common compounds and ions of the various oxidation
states are: -1, hydrobromic acid (HBr) and its salts, the bromides (Br-); +l,
hypobromous acid (HBrO) and its salts, the hypobromites, (Bro-); +5, bromic
acid (HBrO 3) and its salts, the bromates (BrO3-); +7, perbromic acid (HBrO4)
6
and its salts, the perbromates (Br04-). There is also evidence for the existence
of the oxides, Br20, BrO, Br02 with oxidation numbers for bromine of+ 1, +2,
and +4 respectively (Mussini and Faita, 1973). Bromous acid (+3) forms as an
intermediate step in several reactions (Mussini and Faita, 1973; Moeller et al,
1989). The values of the fundamental thermodynamics for the more significant
bromine species at different oxidation states at 25°C are listed in table (2-1. l ).
The reaction chemistry is characterised by the ease with which its atoms acquire
an electron to form either the uninegative ion Br or a single covalent bond -Br.
The potential of the reversible bromine/bromide couple can be expressed in
terms of either the electrode reaction:
(2-1.1)
or
(2-1.2)
for which the standard potential E0 for equation (2-1.1) is 1.0652 V and the
standard potential E 0 for equation (2-1.2) is 1.0874 V (Mussini and Faita, 1973)
and these establish the strong oxidizing power of bromine. For this reason,
redox couples with E0 values less than that of the 1t2Br2/Br couple are usually
subject to oxidation by bromine. In particular, the oxidation strength of bromine
relative to that of the other halogens (ie. F- >Cl-> Br > I-) makes it possible for
bromine to oxidize iodide ions.
(2-1.3)
(2-1.4)
and in the presence of excess chlorine, bromide ion can be oxidised to bromate
I On.
(2-1.5)
(2-1.6)
8
(2-1.7)
so that oxidation of water is the overall result. The reaction (2-1.8) is greatly
accelerated by sunlight (or photolysis) and by catalysts such as platinum and
metallic oxides.
with a free energy LiG~98 = -49.79 kJ/mol. The reactions of HBr in aqueous
solutions may be classified, according to the outcome, as either addition or
substitution. Addition reaction may be further sub-divided into those wherein
the HBr bond remains intact and those wherein the bond is broken. Substitution
reactions are exemplified by protonation, halogenation, oxidation or reduction.
9
1e.
HBr --) H+ Br
I I
Protonating Halogenating
agent agent
Reducing Oxidizing
agent agent
(eg. metal)
1/2Ri 1/2Bri
Thus, solutions of hydrobromic acid or bromides, even when very acidic, exert
only a very small partial pressure of gaseous hydrogen bromide (Pourbaix,
1966). HBr is a strong acid with pKa value of approximately -9.00. Agents with
the capacity to oxidize HBr to bromine include atomic nitrogen, oxygen,
fluorine, hypochlorite, permanganate, hot concentrated sulphuric acid and
chlorine. The thermodynamics of the reaction of oxygen with HBr:
(2-1.12)
for example, is favourable but does not proceed at room temperature. The
reaction (2-1.12) is accelerated by photolytic action.
(2-1.13)
(2-1.14)
10
(2-1.16)
In aqueous solutions, bromide ions become hydrated and thus break down the
water structure in the immediate neighbourhood. This effect tends to increase
the mobility of adjacent molecules. Bromine reacts with bromide to form the
tribromide ion, according to the reaction:
(2-1.17)
(2-1.18)
11
These reactions allow for the high solubility of bromine in aqueous solution of
bromide ions. Thus in common with chloride and iodide ions, bromide ions
function as ligands to form bromo complexes (eg. with majority of metal ions or
other ligands).
(2-1.19)
OXIDATION
+7 +5 +3 +1 0 -1
STATE
SPECIES/ r---+1.51
EQUILIBRIUM -
+1.76 BrO3
- +1.49 HOBr +1.59 Br 2 +1.07 Br
POTENTIAL (V) Br04
1.0
0.6
--. . __ --. . __ --. . __ - . . __ --. j_ 0. 6
-1~-~-~--~ ~--J_
'
- - --- ---
1 -._ I..__ ..__ --.
j J
2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
pH~
Figure (2-1.1) The potential-pH diagram for the bromine - water system at
2soc (Mussini and Faita, 1973). Equilibria considered are:
(a) H+fH 2(g) (b) O2(g)/H2O (c) HBr03'Br03· (d) Br3'Bi- (e)
Br0 3·/Br(f) Br2(aq)/Br3· (g) Br03·/Br3· (h) HBrOJffir2(aq)
(i) BrO 3·/Br2(aq) (I) Br20)/Br3· (m) HBrOJffir2(1) (n) BrO3·
/Br2 (o) BrO 4·/BrO3· (p) BrO4·/HBrO3
2 3 4 5 6 7 -1 0 3 4 2
5 6 7
2 .---...-~. .---~---- -..--..--- ~~2
1,8 1,8
1,4 1,4
1,2
3 4 5 6 7 -1 0 2 3 4 5
2
1,8
Bro 3 1,6
1,4
1,2 1,2
08
, Br- Q8 8~ Q8
~6 Q6 Q6
0, 4 L,__.___L ..--.L-~'--- -'----'-----'- -----' 0,4 '-----'--'-- -'----'----- -'---'---'-- ---' 0, 4.
-1 o 2 3 '+ 5 iH
7 -1 0 2 3 4 5 iH 7
c. d.
2-1-3 Toxicity
2-2 ZINC
The element zinc belongs to the zinc family (comprising zinc, cadmium and
mercury) or group IIB elements of the period table which follows copper, silver
and gold. The atom of zinc has an electronic structure which ends with 3d 104s 2
and does not form ions with incomplete d shell.
15
Whereas in Cu, Ag and Au, the filled d shells may lose one or two d electrons to
give ions or complexes in the I, II and ill states, there is no evidence for
oxidation states higher than II for zinc. This follows from the fact that the third
ionization potential of zinc is extremely high (ie. 40.0 e V) and the energy of
solvation or lattice formation cannot suffice to render the ill oxidation state
chemically stable. Therefore, the only important oxidation state of Zn is the +2
state. There is little evidence that Zn forms a strongly reducing univalent ion
zn+, but is highly unstable and can be obtained when aqueous solutions of Zn 2+
are irradiated.
2-2-2 Thermodynamics
Zinc is an active metal above hydrogen on the electromotive force (EMF) scale.
The value for the standard potential (calculated from thermodynamic data) is
Zinc hydroxide is nearly insoluble in water (solubility product, ksp = 10- 14),but
it dissolves in acid solutions to give zincic ions, Zn 2+ and in excess alkaline
solutions to give anionic hydroxo species, ie. bizincate, HZnOz-(or Zn(OH)3-)
or zincate ions, Zn022-(or Zn(OH)4 2-). At high hydroxide concentrations,
Zn(OH)4 2- is the only species. In neutral solution, the tendency to form hydroxo
species is small as depicted by the value log k = -8.96 for the equilibrium:
Zinc oxide, ZnO, is formed when the hydroxide is heated (or at temperatures
above 39°C) and is insoluble in water. ZnO is an intrinsic semiconductor with
an energy gap of 316 kJ moI-1 but when heated in zinc vapour the solid becomes
a metal- excess n-type semiconductor with an energy gap of only 5.0 kJ/mol.
The aquo ions of zinc are quite strong acids and aqueous solutions of its salts
are hydrolysed. In solutions, in the presence of a ligand (or a complexant), the
zinc ions form sp3 hybridized orbitals giving tetrahedrally coordinated
complexes. The primary coordination number is four, although others (eg. 6-co-
ordinates) have been shown to exist. Apparently, due to the complete inertness
18
of the d-orbital electrons in Zn and not used in bond formation, no ligand field
stabilization effects occur in zinc complexes. Ligand bonding, thus occurs in
zinc complexes presumably via covalent sigma bond formation of the sp3
hybrids and yields relatively stable tetrahedrally co-ordinated complexes. The
stereochemistry of the zinc complexes is determined by the ligand size, and
electrostatic and covalent bonding forces.
The stability of the various complex ions influences the reactions of the zinc
ions in solution. The stabilities of selected anionic complexes, [ZnX4J2- (where
X = Ligand), as measured by the equilibrium constants of the reaction
Ligand
c1- 1
Br- 10-1
1- 10-2
CN- 1021
However, there is evidence for the attainment of all four stages of complexation
by zinc with most possible ligands (eg. Cl-, Br- and 1-) (Cotton and Wilkinson,
1972). The formation of fluoro complexes is restricted, and none has been
isolated as a solid. Generally, complex formation follows the pattern given
below for a ligand X, of negative charge n.
19
Zn 2+ + xn = ZnX2-n (2-2.6)
(2-2.8)
(2-2.9)
The respective formation constants for several common ligands are also given in
table (2-2.2).
F- 0.92
c1- 0.72 -0.49 -0.19 -0.18
Be 0.22 -0.10 -0.74 -1.00
1- -0.47 -2.00 -0.74 -1.25
CN- 11.07 26.05 35.67
OH- 6.31 11.19 14.31 17.70
SCN- 1.57 1.56 1.51 3.02
so/- 2.08
The zn2+ ion is a hard acid (the term "hard acid" will be used when Zn 2+ tends
to form more stable complexes with fluorine and oxygen donor atoms).
Complex cations with ammonia and amine ligands (eg Zn(NH3)42+) are well
defined and can be obtained as crystalline salts. These are principally tetrahedral
complexes.
20
-z -I 0 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 JO II 12 13 14 15 15
2.2 2.2
E.(v)
2 2
1.8
0 ~ 1.'l
1.6 u::
Zn 02
1.4
,~
0
1.2
---®-- ·2
·O ;, ?
-5
6
-6
'
0.8
--4, ' 0.8
·?
..__ 7
'' 0
0.6 ' 0.6
'' 8
0.4
'
,-
----t
0.4
0.2
- 0.2
0 %_ Zn
+,
zA(oH) 2 0
-0,2 -o_z
-0.4 - C, 4
---'- -0.G
-0,6 ~:_Zn0 2
' ''
'
---,_
'
'
- fnoz- ·';_8
-!
-1 0 -? -4 • 6 ''
-1.2 -1,2
.-1.~ -1, 4
Zn
-1,6 -1,6
0-2-<. -6
-1,8 -1,8
-z -1 0 2 J 4 5 5 7 8 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
pH
2-3 GOLD
Gold is the 79th element in the periodic table, classified with Cu and Ag in
group 1B. It has a single s electron outside a completed d shell (outer electron
configuration being 5d106sl).
In the massive form, gold is a soft, yellow metal with a moderately high melting
point (1063°C) and a high electrical and thermal conductivity exceeded among
the elements by silver and copper. It is the most malleable and ductile of the
metals. It has an atomic weight of 196.97 and a density at 20°C of 19.3 g cm-3.
Like the other group 1B elements, gold crystallises in the face-centred cubic
lattice and the closest inter-nuclear distance is 288.4 pm.
Gold in the native state is the most noble of the metals. It is chemically
unreactive and is not affected by water or most acids (eg. hydrochloric acid) and
is not attacked by oxygen or sulphur. Gold does however react with tellurium at
high temperatures and reacts readily with all the halogens. It also dissolves
readily in aqua regia (HCl/HNO3) and in alkali cyanide solutions in the
presence of air. Also, mercury amalgamates about 0. 70% by weight of gold at
25°C. This amalgamating effect of mercury is essentially the result of
mechanical mixing, wetting, and smface reactions between gold and mercury.
In its compounds, gold as Au(I) and Au(III) has the closed-shell electronic
configuration of d 10-type and d8-type respectively and exhibits mainly a
covalent character because of the high ionisation potentials of the two states of
oxidation.
23
2-3-2 Thermodynamics
Gold is unreactive in pure water. The free aurous ion Au(I) is not stable in water
and the free Au(ID) is a strong oxidant. For this reason, the standard potential
for Au(l)/Au(0) couple cannot be determined directly and probably the best
value that can be obtained for the reaction:
Au++ e- = Au (2-3.1)
E = 1.229 V (2-3.3)
which accounts for the stability of gold in aqueous solutions (Marsden and
House, 1992). The activity of gold is reduced in the presence of certain
complexing ligands by the formation of stable complexes and hence the aqueous
chemistry of gold is essentially that of complex ions.
(2-3.4)
24
(2-3.5)
where Lis the complexing ligand (and may be ions such as CN-, Cl-, SCN-,Br-
or uncharged molecules (eg. NH3, H2O, (NH2) 2CS)). It is also possible, in the
presence of complexing ligands for the oxidation of Au(I) to Au(ID) according
to the reaction:
(2-3.6)
This shows that Au(I) generally has the preference to form a linear complex
with two fold co-ordination and Au(ID) has a marked tendency towards the
formation of a four fold coordination complex.
Representing the standard electrode potential for reaction (2-3.4) as E 0 1,0 and
that of reaction (2-3.5) as E0 3,o, it can be easily shown that:
(2-3.7)
The standard potentials, E0 3,1 for reaction (2-3.6) for oxidation of Au(I) to
Au(ID) in the presence of a complexing ligand can be deduced. The standard
potentials for species which form stable gold complexes are listed in Table (2-
3.1 ). The standard potentials show that these species or ligands form water-
stable complexes with gold. In the case of CN- the lowering of the reduction
potential (E0 , Au(I)/ Au(0)) is about 2.46 volts relative to the simple Au+ ion in
water.
Such effects are a function of the large stability constants associated with these
gold complexes . A selection of stability constants have been listed in Table (2-
3.2). These stability constants also show that there is a direct relationship
between standard potential and the magnitude of the stability constant and that
some complexing ligands form more stable complexes with Au(I) and others
with Au(ID). A useful generalisation for this preferred oxidation state is related
to the electron configuration of the donor (or complexing ) ligand atom (ie., the
atom in the ligand which is bound directly to the gold).
25
Table (2-3.2) Stability constants for selected Au(I) and Au(ill) complexes
(Adamson, 1972).
Both Au(I) and Au(III) are B-type metal ions which means that the stability of
their complexes tends to decrease as the electronegativity of the ligand donor
atom increases (i.e. as the tendency of the atom to attract electrons increases).
This accounts for the stability order for the halogen complexes, 1- > Br- > Cl- >
26
p-, where the order of electronegativities is F- > Cl- > Br- > 1-. It also accounts
for the stability orders such as Bi> Sb> As> P, Te> Se> S > O and CN- >
NH3 > H2O and explains why gold tellurides, gold bismuthide and aurostibnite
are stable enough to be found in nature. Thus both Au(I) and Au(ID) prefer to
bond to large polarizable ligands. However, Au(I) ion discriminates more than
Au(ID) ion between hard ligands (Ligands, containing hard donor atoms (i.e.
NR3, N=N=N-, NO2-, RCOO-, NO3-, SO/-, F and Cr) preferring metals ions of
high valency, that preferentially form stable complexes of Au(ID) to the gold
will be referred to as "hard (a-bonding) ligands) and soft ligands (the term "soft
(1t-bonding) ligands" will be used when ligands, containing soft donor atoms
(i.e. CN-, PR3, SR2, S=C(NH2)2, SCN-, S2O3 2-, Se=C(NH2h, SeCN- and r)
preferring metals ions of low valency, preferentially form stable complexes of
Au(I) to the gold), and has the greater B-type metal character. Soft electron
donor ligands such as cyanide, thiourea, thiocyanate and thiosulphate, prefer
metal ions of Au(I) whereas hard electron donor ligands (eg., chloride,
bromide.) prefer Au(ID) ions. By and large, the oxidation of gold to Au(I) or
Au(ID) in the presence of a particular ligand will also depend on the strength of
the oxidizing agent or oxidant and on the relative magnitudes of E 0 1,o and E 0 3,0·
Some possible oxidants are also shown in table (2-3.1).
similar. Amie chloride and bromide are soluble in water and excess chloride or
bromide ion yields the complex AuCl4- and AuBq- respectively. In solutions
containing excess cyanide, Au(CN)4-, Au(CN)52- and Au(CN) 63- are formed.
Au(ID) thiocyanates are known, but the most common of these, Au(SCN)4- is
insoluble in water. Au(ID) salts of oxyanions are not particularly stable, but
solutions containing complex auric nitrates, sulphates, and others, (eg.
[Au(N03)4]-, [Au(S04)i]-) can be prepared. Gold selenate, Au2(Se04)), and
gold selenite, Au2(Se03)) are relatively stable. In strongly alkaline solutions,
pH > 13, the soluble hydroaurate species, Au(OH)4- (or H2Auo 3-) and
Au(OH)5 2- (or HAu03 2-) are formed.
Au(I) and Au(ID) species for bromide have been identified (Latimer, 1952;
Schmid and Curley-Fiorino, 1975; Schmid, 1985). The thermodynamic
properties of the gold- bromide species are given in Table (2-3.3).
AuBr can be prepared but the bromide slowly disproportionate in water to yield
metallic gold and auric bromide. Aurous bromide dissolves in alkaline bromide
solutions to form the aurous bromide complex, AuBr2-- Auric bromide is soluble
in water and in excess bromide ion yields the auric bromide complex, AuBq-.
Gold dissolves in a mixture of hydrobromic acid and nitric acid to form
tetrabromoauric(ID) acid, H[AuBq], which can be isolated in the hydrated form
as HAuBr4.5H2O by evaporation of the solution. In aqueous solution AuBq-
ions are hydrolysed to some extent as:
(2-3.9)
(2-3.10)
Au (OH) 5
--.... --~-
...... ......
Eh ID ---- -._
.............................
-- --- ---
0.0
..... _ Au
-...-... ........ ..._ .......
---- ----
--- -- --
--- -- -
- I .O-----L.__ _.____...J.____ _.l._,_--L_--1... _-..J.._-1_
--- ___]
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
pH
The diagram shows that metallic gold covers a very large area of predominance
including the entire domain of water stability and that Au3+ and other oxidized
forms of gold only occur at potentials above the upper stability limit of water.
At these potentials, water will be oxidised to oxygen (according to equation (2-
3.3)) and the various oxidised gold species will be reduced simultaneously to the
metallic state. As a result, Au(ill) is unstable in pure water and will be reduced
to the metallic state by very weak reductants. Au(I) has a higher E0 value than
Au(ill) and makes this ionic species even relatively less stable in water than
Au(ill). Au(I) does not appear on the diagram because it disproportionates
spontaneously according the reaction (2-3 .1 ). The equilibria governing the
Au(I)/Au(0) and Au(ill)/Au(0) couples are therefore represented by (Marsden
and House, 1992):
and
respectively, where Eis the reduction potential. This means that any decrease in
the concentration of free gold ions will decrease the reduction potential, E, and
enhance the stability of the dissolved gold relative to water.
In contrast to the situation existing in pure water, Figure (2-3.1), the presence of
the bromide ligands significantly increases the range of conditions over which
dissolved gold is stable. More importantly, the reduction potential for the
dissolved gold species is now less than that of water over at least some part of
the diagram.
31
Figure (2-3.3a-d) also shows the Eh - pH diagrams for Au-Br-H2O at 25°C for
[Au] = 10-3 M and varying concentrations of bromide. Increasing the bromide
concentration forces the Au/AuBq- boundary to lower potentials. Thus, at a
concentration of [Au] = 10-3 M, varying the concentration of [Br-] from 10-5 to
1.0 M, the AuBq- stability region is expanded and Eh (potential) values for
Au/AuBq- are lowered from 1.20 V to 0.80 V. Also the equilibrium for AuBq-
/Au(OH)) couple moves up from pH:4.00 to pH: 11.00, thus widening the
AuBq- window. This indicates that AuBq- stability increases with increasing
bromide concentration in the solution.
From figures (2-3.2) and (2-3.3) the reaction paths for the dissolution of gold in
bromide solution can be synthesized. Similarly, gold extraction from bromide
solution can also be described.
32
2.0
Au(OH) 3
I. 5
AuBr; HAuo;-
H2Auo;
1.0
Eh ..........
..........
AuBr; ..........
..........
.......... ........_
..........
0.5 ' -.......... ........_
..........
Au ..........
0.0
- 0. 5 . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . J . . . _ _ _ . . h _ _ _ l . . _ _ L _ _ _ J_ __J
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
pH
2.0 2.0
a) (b)
1.2 1.2
0.4 - 0.4
Au(OH) 52 -
Eh
-0.4
-------------- ~ - -
[Au3+] = 1 o-3 M Au
Eh
-04
---------- -
[Au3+] = 10-3 M
Au(OH)s2 -
-2.0 -2.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 00 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
pH pH
C) (d)
1.2
0.4
Au(OH) 5 2 - Au(OH) 5 2 -
Eh -- -----
Eh -0.4 -
-0.4 --~-
Au
[Au 3•j ~ 1o-3 M Au [Au3• 1= 10- 3 M
-1.2 [8,]=10- 1 M -1.2 [Br· ) = i .0 M
Figure (2-3.3) Eh-pH diagram for the Au-Br-H 2O system at 25°C (a) [Au]
= 10-3 M, [Br] = 10-5 M (b) [Au] = [Br-] = 10-3 M (c) [Au] =
10-3 M, [Br] = 0.1 M (d) [Au] = 10-3 M, [Br] = 1.0 M
(Dadgar, 1989).
CHAPTER THREE
HYDROMETALLURGY OF GOLD
Historically, the early metallurgy of gold was almost totally involved with
gravity techniques (due to its high specific gravity), from placer-type deposits,
sometimes aided by amalgamation with mercury (Eisele, 1988). These advances
were unsuitable for the recovery of fine gold and gold associated with sulphide
minerals and consequently became unpopular and prompted the search for an
effective hydrometallurgical process. The first hydrometallurgical approach for
the dissolution of gold from its ores was the chlorination process which was
proposed by Plattner in 1851 (Liddell, 1945). This consisted of passing chlorine
gas over crushed ore to produce a soluble gold chloride which was then leached
out with water and precipitated with ferrous sulphate, hydrogen sulphide or
charcoal. The properties of several other chemicals or reagents for dissolving
gold and silver were known in the late l 800's and early 1900's. These included
bromine/bromide, cyanide, thiosulphate and thiourea solutions (Plaksin and
Kozhukhova, 1941; Preisler and Berger, 1947).
The dissolution of gold by potassium cyanide (in the presence of oxygen) was
discovered in 1846 by Elsner, patented between 1887 and 1889 by McArthur
and Robert and William Forrest and was studied in detail subsequently by
Bodlander in 1896 (Habashi, 1970; Eisele, 1988). This event radically changed
the hydrometallurgical processing of gold although the action of cyanide on
precious metals had been noted years earlier (Clennell, 1915) and rapidly
35
developed into a commercial process. The first commercial use of cyanide for
gold extraction was in New Zealand in 1889 (Shoemaker, 1984; McNulty,
1989). This followed in South Africa in 1890, United States of America in 1891,
Mexico in 1900 and in France in 1904 (Shoemaker, 1984; Marsden and House,
1992). These early operations involved percolation leaching in vats. During the
following decades, the development of agitated tanks/thickeners and classifiers
for leaching and washing allowed development of the countercurrent
decantation cyanide leach plant.
In parallel with the cyanidation process, recovery of gold from the pregnant
cyanide solution was by zinc precipitation (or cementation) using zinc shavings
which was patented by McArthur and the Forrest brothers (McArthur et al,
1889). This process was improved by Merrill and Crowe with the use of zinc
dust (rather than zinc shavings in zinc boxes), the introduction of de-aeration
and the addition of small quantities of soluble lead salts to solutions prior to
precipitation. Cyanidation, thus continued in this fashion with only
improvements in the mechanical and physical handling aspects of the process
until about 1950 when hydrocyclones started to replace mechanical classifiers in
gold mills. Organic flocculants were also developed for the thickening and
washing of cyanide pulps, improving clarification of pregnant solutions for the
zinc cementation step.
Electrolytic recovery processes using lead foil cathodes (Siemens and Halske
process) and carbon sheet cathodes (Tainton process) were used in the late
1800's but did not prove economic. Precipitation by aluminium powder had a
very brief spot those early days. The use of carbon (wood charcoal) for
recovering gold from cyanide solutions was patented in 1894 and was
commercially used at Youanmi Mine, Western Australia in 1916 as an
alternative to zinc cementation. Various investigators experimented with
activated carbon over the years (Crabtree et al, 1950). However, the only known
means to recover gold from carbon at that time was to burn it. This was difficult
to accomplish and sometimes the loaded carbon was sold to a smelter. Hence,
the process became uncompetitive and was usually only resorted to when zinc
precipitation could not be used.
At this time, an all important research began at the United States Bureau of
Mines (USBM) for methods to strip gold (or silver) from loaded carbon which
would then allow the carbon to be re-used to make the entire carbon process
36
very economical for the recovery of gold. Initially, an alkaline Na2S stripping
method (that eluted the gold but not the silver from carbon) was described
(Zadra, 1950). This method was not satisfactory because most ores contain some
silver and the carbon would eventually be loaded with unstrippable silver. In
1952, this process was modified by the USBM researchers to use hot caustic and
cyanide which could desorb both gold and silver from loaded carbon (Zadra et
al, 1952). Concurrently with stripping, the leach solution was passed through an
electrolytic cell (known as Zadra's cell) where the gold and silver were
recovered on a steel wool cathode. An important feature, was that, the hot
NaOH-NaCN solution desorbed more than 90% of the gold and silver in 4-6
hours, and the carbon could be re-used a number of times ( <10 times) without
thermal reactivation and significant activity losses. The carbon adsorption
permitted gold and silver recovery from slimy ores by eliminating the
requirement of a clarified solution and was invariably an efficient means for
collecting gold from dilute solutions. This was therefore a precursor for two
important developments in gold and silver ore processing; carbon-in-pulp, CIP (
including carbon-in-leach, CIL) cyanidation and heap leaching.
In 1969, Heinen, and other researchers at the USBM developed heap leaching as
a low-cost method for recovering gold values from low-grade materials
37
containing micron-size particles of gold which otherwise would not have been
exploitable economically by conventional agitation cyanidation (Heinen and
Potter, 1969; Potter, 1969). This permitted the recovery of gold and silver from
crushed ores and wastes heaped on an impermeable pads or membrane and had
the advantage of very low capital and operating costs. However, ores that
contained high clay content were untreatable by heap leaching. These ores
swelled on contact with the leaching solution and affected heap permeability.
Similarly, crushing the ore to the liberation size for gold-silver extraction
generated large amounts of fines that were washed into the voids by the
percolating leaching solution, caused channelling, and resulted in partial
leaching of gold and silver from the heap material. For these reasons, in the late
1970's, an agglomeration process was developed also at USBM, that
successfully overcame these problems (Heinen et al, 1979; McClelland and
Eisele, 1982). Agglomeration was achieved by mixing the ore with lime and/or
cement and water in an agglomeration drum, or by conveyor handling in the
crusher plant ore stacking system. This simple pretreatment increased the flow
of solution through some ores several thousand-fold and decreased the leaching
cycle very significantly. Heap leaching took advantage of the concurrent
development of carbon adsorption processes by using carbon-in-columns for
gold recovery from solution followed by electrowinning. Zinc precipitation is
preferred in the case of high silver concentrations or when the cost of a carbon
stripping/reactivation circuit cannot be justified.
During the 1970's and 1980's, major efforts were directed at the treatment of
ores (refractory ores) which could not be effectively treated by simple
cyanidation. These ores contain minerals (sulphide minerals, carbonaceous
materials, tellurium minerals) which are present at much greater concentrations
than the gold, often cause problems because they dissolve in solution and hence
consume cyanide and oxygen (cyanicide) (Finkelstein, 1972). Historically,
severely refractory ores and concentrates, have been roasted to completely
oxidize the refractory portion of the ore and render the contained gold leachable.
In 1971, carbonaceous ore was treated by chlorination, followed by cyanidation
and zinc precipitation (later replaced by CIP). In 1977, the process was altered
to a double oxidation circuit by incorporating a pre-aeration stage ahead of
chlorination. Pressure oxidation was established for the treatment of gold-
bearing sulphides. A bio-oxidation process to partially oxidize flotation
concentrates was developed and practised. The motivation for the continued
development of bio-oxidation process is the potential cost savings over pressure
38
Metallurgical research and development work have been prolific in the 1980's.
These have been towards the need to treat lower grade ores with more complex
mineralogy coupled with the increasing environmental requirements placed on
mining operations. The continued development of refractory ore projects has
encouraged renewed interest in lixiviants for gold that could be used in acidic
media to avoid the high neutralisation costs required by alkaline cyanidation of
oxidized products. Thiourea and ammonium thiosulphate have received
significant attention. Several studies have shown promising results for these
leachants (Chen et al, 1980; Tozawa et al, 1981; Hiskey, 1984; Charley, 1984;
Filmer et al, 1984; Gabra, 1984; Block-Bolten et al, 1985; Block-Bolten and
Torma, 1986; Loveday, 1986; Sandberg and Huiatt, 1986). The use of
halide/halogen systems for extracting gold has been tested lately. Various
iodine/iodide systems have been evaluated by Davis, Tran and Young (Davis,
1991; Davis and Tran, 1991; Davis et al, 1993). Hiskey and Qi also reported on
similar systems (Hiskey and Qi, 1991). Several bromine/bromide systems have
also been evaluated (Sehic, 1988; Dadgar, 1989; Pesic and Sergent, 1990; Pesic
and Sergent, 1991; Pesic, 1992; Dadgar and Howarth, 1992). The Great Lakes
Chemical Corporation (USA) and Kaljas Limited. (Australia) (Sehic, 1988),
have developed a series of reagents which can provide bromine for gold
dissolution (Pesic and Sergent, 1990; Pesic and Sergent, 1991).
Gold is inert at ambient temperatures and pressures and consequently there are
very few naturally occun-ing compounds of the metal. The average
concentration of gold in the earth's crust is 0.005 git, which is much lower than
most other metals, for example, silver (0.07 g/t) and copper (50 git). In nature,
gold occurs predominantly as native metal or as ~ major constituent of various
alloys, primarily, silver, copper, or platinoid metals. Its other main occun-ence is
as gold-silver tellurides. However, it occurs in small amounts in a number of
silver minerals (tetrahedrite, tennanite, argentite, hessite etc.) and as a common
constituent of copper (an average of 0.3-0.9 git) and base-metal ores (an average
of 0.4-0.9 mg/1). Gold also occurs in lead-zinc-silver ores. Gold does not f01m a
separate sulphide mineral but is found in various types of ore deposits (primary,
39
Placer ores are alluvial, eluvial or colluvial deposits for which diagenetic
processes have occurred to a limited extent. Gold normally occurs as free
(particulate or loosely consolidated) gold alloyed with silver. These require no
milling (crushing and grinding) and are treated by washing, gravity
concentration and amalgamation. The amalgamation process is however, almost
obsolete now. Cyanide leaching, in fact, is not at all necessary for the treatment
of such ores.
Free milling ores are palaeo-placers (lithified conglomerates) or quartz vein gold
ores. The gold is unliberated and the ore is consolidated. The essential feature is
that the gold is relatively coarse and does not contain an excess of interfering
elements. Crushing and grinding is therefore required to liberate the gold to an
extent which allows efficient gold extraction. Cyanidation, in particular, can
extract approximately 95% of the gold when the ore is ground to a size of 80%
passing 75 µm, without incmTing prohibitively high reagent consumption.
Frequently, some of the gold is recovered by gravity concentration and
amalgamation and gangue mineral composition does not significantly affect the
processing requirements.
Oxidized ores are weathered (or oxidized) primary ore/deposit for which some
processing steps may be employed. Generally, the degree of gold liberation is
increased by oxidation resulting in increased permeability which often allows
40
Refractory ores almost always come from primary and secondary zones and
contain complex minerals in which the gold is principally unliberated and
occluded in their matrices. They interfere with amalgamation and leaching
processes in terms of process selection or operating conditions and require
pretreatment. In particular, they are not amenable to direct cyanidation without a
pretreatment (Seymour et al, 1989; Foo et al, 1989; Dry and Coatzee, 1986;
Beattie et al, 1988). These are classified as sulphidic, carbonaceous or telluride
ores. The important sulphide minerals are pyrite, marcasite, pyrrhotite,
arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, chalcocite, stibnite, galena and sphalerite. In the
sulphidic ores, the gold may be free milling but the sulphides tend to decompose
cyanide. Pyrrhotite and marcasite consume cyanide (cyanicide) and oxygen in
cyanidation. Pyrite is usually only a problem in processing if it reduces gold
liberation and rarely a significant cyanicide. Fine gold occlusions in pyrite
require more extreme conditions to be liberated. Gold/stibnite associations are
rare, though stibnite can occur at sufficiently high concentrations in gold ores to
cause problems as a cyanicide.
Gold tellurides usually contain some native gold, together with gold and other
metal tellurides, often with complex intergrowths. They occur as calaverite
(AuTe2), krennerite ((Au,Ag)Te2), petzite (Ag3AuTe2), muthmannite
((Ag,Au)Te), sylvanite ((Au,Ag)Te4), nagyagite ((Pb5Au(Te,Sb)4S 5_g),
kostovite (AuCuTe4) and montbrayite ((Au,Sb)Te3) and are the only gold
minerals other than metallic gold and Au-Ag which are of economic significance
(Boyle, 1979). Ores containing gold tellurides have unique, and generally poorly
optimised, processing requirements. Gold tellurides, with or without silver,
dissolve extremely slowly in cyanide solutions and usually require an oxidation
stage to obtain commercially viable extractions. The presence of clay minerals
such as pyrophyllite in gold ores also produce refractory properties (Marsden
and House, 1992). They are capable of absorbing gold complexes.
Another group of gold ores which are of metallurgical importance are those with
high silver content. Although, gold is almost always associated with silver,
when the silver grade is high (> 10 git) and/or the gold is present as electrum
(silver-rich ores) the processing may need to be modified. The greater reactivity
of silver particularly influences the behaviour of gold in flotation, leaching
and/or recovery processes. Gravity and cyanide methods do not generally
remove all of the silver from such ores (Boyle, 1979; Marsden and House,
1992).
Gold metallurgy covers many facets including leaching and recovery. In the
context of gold extraction, leaching is the dissolution of the metal or mineral in
aqueous solution which requires both a complexant and an oxidant to achieve
acceptable leaching rates. Only a limited number of ligands form complexes of
sufficient stability for use in gold extraction processes, some of which are
shown in table (2-3.1 ). Figure (3-3.1) is a schematic gold extraction/recovery
process flowsheet showing in essence the important metallurgical units of gold
processing.
42
gold cone.
Flotation
- roasting
Pre-treannent - chemical oxidation
,....__----.-_ __. - bio-oxidation
- Cyanidation
- Non-cyanidation
~=;;;;;;;;;;;;.==.;:;;,I
Solid/Liquid
Separation
- carbon adsorption/electrowinning
- zinc precipitation-Merril Crowe
Gold
3-3-1 Cyanidation
Cyanidation since its invention about 100 years ago, has been the standard
method for gold and silver extraction. It involves the dissolution of gold by
alkaline cyanide solution in the presence of oxygen (as an oxidant). The cyanide
most commonly used is sodium cyanide due to its greater dissolving power and
lower cost. Oxygen is introduced as air. In the conventional mode of cyanide
leaching, the gold ore is first crushed and finely ground. It is subsequently
subjected to long hours (for up to 24 hours) of leaching with the alkali cyanide
solution. This is effected in a number of ways which are all variations of
percolation or agitation leaching (Stewart, 1984; Marsden and House, 1992).
Percolation leaching takes place in vats, heaps and dumps, in which the
comminuted ore is placed in vats or on an impervious base such as clay or
polyurethane ( eg. heap leaching) and cyanide solution is percolated upwards or
downwards through the bed until the effluent reaches an economically high
enough value. It is essential that the charge is sufficiently permeable for the
solution to percolate evenly and must not be too fine or contain clay.
43
CN-
Anodic: Au + CN- =[AuCNlacts---Au(CNh-+e- (3-3.1)
Au+OH
- ow
= [AuOHlacts---Au(OHh+3e- (3-3.2)
or
Cathodic: (3-3.3)
(3-3.4)
(3-3.5)
and
(3-3.6)
According to Christy (Chiisty, 1900), at least 0.001 % CN- is required for any
gold dissolution to occur. Habashi (Habashi, 1970) reported that the rate of gold
dissolution increases linearly with increasing cyanide concentration until a
maximum is reached, beyond which a further increase in cyanide concentration
does not increase the amount dissolved, but, on the contrary, has a slight
retarding effect. The decrease in rate at high cyanide concentration is due to the
increase in the pH of the solution via hydrolysis of the cyanide ion:
(3-3.7)
Kudryk and Kellogg (Kudryk and Kellogg, 1954) also reported (or proposed)
that, the dissolution of gold is controlled by the diffusion of dissolved oxygen
and the cyanide ion species through a diffusion boundary layer. At low cyanide
concentration (0.01 % or 0.004M CN-), the dissolution rate is dependent on the
cyanide concentration (increasing linearly with cyanide concentration). At a
mole ratio of cyanide to oxygen greater than 10, the dissolution of gold is
dependent on the diffusion rate of oxygen and not that of cyanide ions. In
addition, the solubility of oxygen decreases as cyanide concentration increases,
meaning less available oxygen for the leaching reaction (Law, 1982). Thus, in
the presence of excess free cyanide, increasing dissolved oxygen concentration
increases the rate of dissolution. However, higher dissolved oxygen
concentrations (>20 mg/litre), may cause passivation of the gold surface due to
oxide layer formation (Cathro and Walkley, 1961; Cathro, 1963).
(3-3.8)
HCN has a relatively high vapour pressure of 100 kPa at 26°C (Huiatt et al,
1983). When the pH is reduced to below pH:9.40, the equilibrium between CN-
and HCN favours the formation of gaseous HCN. This (pH> 9.40) is achieved
by the addition of lime or caustic soda to the slurry during leaching to maintain
a protective alkalinity of pH:10.00 to 11.00. A too high pH value is also
detrimental because the rate of dissolution falls sharply due to increase in the
rate of interfering reactions such as the dissolution of sulphides, antimony and
arsenic-bearing materials.
(3-3.9)
and
(3-3. 10)
(3-3.11)
and therefore consume both cyanide and oxygen. Thiocyanate has been recorded
variously as being inert towards, an inhibitor and an accelerator of the
cyanidation of gold (Kameda, 1949; Habashi, 1967). Pyrite usually causes
relatively a less significant effect but catalyses the oxygen reduction step and
may cause gold passivation (Muir, 1989; Marsden and House, 1992). The
copper minerals (eg., chalcocite and chalcopyrite) generally represent more of a
problem in cyanidation than do the corresponding iron minerals. Contents as
little as 0.10% Cu in the ore form a variety of extremely stable soluble Cu(I)
complexes in cyanide solution and in turn have adverse effect on the dissolution
and precipitation. The quantities of cyanide and oxygen consumed are
correspondingly high (Finkelstein, 1972). However, chalcopyrite is the least
objectionable of the copper minerals. Under the conditions applied for gold
leaching in cyanide solutions, the arsenic sulphides (eg., arsenopyrite) and the
antimony sulphides (eg., stibnite), also contribute to excess consumption of
leach solution. They form vanous arsenites/arsenates and
antimonites/antimonates in alkaline cyanide solution, which consume oxygen
47
from solution. Sulphide, thioamonite and thioarsenite ions are frequently formed
as intermediate products and inhibit cyanidation due to their action at the gold
surface (Finkelstein, 1972). Sulphide ions adsorb strongly at the surface of gold
and the adsorption density increases, the gold surface is rendered passive which
significantly retards the gold dissolution rate. Sulphide ion concentrations of
about 0.05 mg/litre have been shown to produce an observable decrease in the
rate of gold dissolution (Fink and Putnam, 1950).
Many metal oxides, carbonates, sulphates and other compounds are also soluble
in alkaline cyanide solutions, with the solubility dependent on specific solution
conditions. These minerals generally consume smaller quantities of cyanide and
oxygen than sulphides but the species formed may affect precipitation reactions
and overall process efficiency. In some cases, metal oxide minerals such as iron
oxides form protective coatings on gold which are virtually insoluble in alkaline
cyanide solutions and inhibit gold cyanidation (Marsden and House, 1992).
Tellurium does not form stable complexes with cyanide and therefore gold-
tellurium minerals (Aux Tey) dissolve slowly in alkaline cyanide solution.
Leaching rates vary for the different minerals, with leaching time requirements
in excess of 14 days in some cases (depending on particle size) (Cornwall and
Hisshion, 1976; Jackman and Sarbutt, I 990).
48
Flotation reagents and other surface reagents also inhibit cyanidation. Thiol
collectors (eg. xanthates and dithiophosphates) are poisons of the cyanidation
reaction and are as powerful as the sulphide ions. Xanthates adsorb at gold
surfaces and render the surface passive to cyanidation (Plaksin and Bessonov,
1948; Kameda, 1949; Barbin, 1963; Ashurst and Finkelstein, 1970). At high
concentrations (order of 10- 2 M), ketones, ethers and alcohols compete with
oxygen for sites at the gold surface in cyanide solutions and retard the
dissolution rate (Barbin, 1963).
Neve1theless, the cyanidation process has been widely pract.iced and its long
acceptance as the overwhelming option for gold processing is in view of its
relative economy and technological simplicity. However, a major concern is the
slow kinetics of the dissolution of gold.
49
toxic. Hydrogen cyanide and simple salts such as sodium, calcium, and
ammonium cyanide dissociate readily to release CN- ion. This group of cyanide
compounds are among the most rapidly acting poisons known. Thus, slightly
elevated changes (increases) in atmospheric concentrations or amounts of
exposure dermally or orally may cause or contribute to instantaneous collapse,
cessation of respiration and/or death. Also, cyanide readily interacts with a
number of biologically active metal ions such as Fe3+ which results in the
inhibition of the enzymatic activity of cytochrome oxidase. Cytochrome oxidase
is the key enzyme in a cell's ability to utilize molecular oxygen. Inhibition of
this proces rapidly leads to loss of cellular functions and then cell death. If the
concentration of cyanide ion is not great enough to cause death, thiocyanate ions
(SCN-) are formed later and at chronically high enough levels in the blood can
inhibit the uptake of iodine by the thyroid gland (Hartung, 1982). The
cyanidation process therefore lends itself to severe environmental restrictions on
the use of cyanide in most places. Stringent environmental guidelines must be
observed requiring careful monitoring and control of process purge streams.
Spent cyanide effluent must be degraded before being discharged to the
environment.
3-3-2-1 Thiourea
The use of acidified thiourea to leach gold and silver was initially reported by
Plaksin and Kozhukhova in 1941 (Plaksin and Kozhukhova, 1941) and by
Preisler and Berger in 1947 (Preisler and Berger, 1947) and has received
51
(3-3.12)
The reduction potential for this reaction is E0 = 0.38 V and the gold exists as the
bis(thiourea) gold(I) complex cation. The process generally requires an
oxidizing agent such as fen-ic ion, hydrogen peroxide, manganese dioxide,
ozone or potassium permanganate (Woodcock, 1987). Among these oxidants,
fen-ic ion is the most effective and produces the fastest initial rate (Groenwald,
1976; Chen et al, 1980; Gabra, 1984). In the presence of ferric ion as an
oxidant, the overall equation for the dissolution reaction is:
The leach rate depends on pH, and thiourea and oxidant concentrations. In use
thiourea decomposes to formamidine disulphide as follows (Hiskey, 1984 ):
(3-3.14)
(3-3.18)
Bilston, La Brooy and Woodcock (Bilston et al, 1984) also observed higher
thiourea consumption at lower pH (<l) and attributed this to the fact that the
hydrolysis of thiourea to urea is catalysed by the hydrogen ion. The reaction
may be represented as:
(3-3.20)
The dissolution rate of gold in thiourea is generally very rapid (much faster than
in cyanide) and extractions of about 95% to 99% can be achieved in two hours
(Finkelstein, 1972). The rate is usually controlled by diffusion of reactants to
the gold surface and is consequently related to the concentrations of Fe(ill),
formamidine disulphide and thiourea species. Optimum kinetics are achieved
when approximately half the thiourea present in the solution is converted to
formamidine disulphide (Marsden and House, 1992).
At the present time, the major drawback of the method appears to be the high
cost of reagents, stemming principally from the instability of thiourea under the
conditions of leaching (Finkelstein, 1972). Thiourea is more expensive than
cyanide. Advantages in the rate of gold dissolution in thiourea solutions must be
weighed against possible high reagent consumption. Nevertheless, interest in the
thiourea system has remained high and it is likely, the technique will remain
restricted to very few situations and to ores/concentrates with sufficient value to
justify the costs of the reagent. The gold thiourea complex is cationic and as
such is more susceptible than anionic species to adsorption on clays. The
adsorption is minimised by operating under acidic conditions but for some
orebodies can substantially reduce the dissolution of gold (Filmer et al, 1984 ).
Eisele (Eisele, 1989) compared gold and silver extractions from fourteen
different ore samples, some containing sulphides, with thiourea and cyanide
leaching, and concluded that if most ores cannot be treated with cyanide they
will not be leached better with thiourea. The lixiviant therefore is applicable to
special cases as reported by Hisshion and Waller (Hisshion and Waller, 1984)
for an antimony ore, and by Zegan-a, Huyhua and Gundiler (Zegan-a et al, 1989)
for manganiferous ores. In these cases the ores are not amenable to cyanidation.
Several studies have also reported that activated carbon, solvent extraction, ion
exchange, hydrogen reduction and electrolysis can be used to recover gold from
thiourea solutions (Zegan-a et al, 1989; Deschenes et al, 1989; Dupius and
Ghali, 1989). Competitive adsorption of other cationic species may limit the
54
resin loadings and activated carbon adsorbs both thiourea and soluble gold
(Filmer et al, 1984). Gold could also be recovered by precipitation with S02 or
by cementation onto aluminium, lead, iron powders or steel wool (Hiskey, 1984;
La Brooy, 1989). Invariably, the downstream recovery of gold from cyanide
solutions appears to be much better characterised and probably simpler than that
for thiourea.
3-3-2-2 Halides
The use of halide/halogen systems for extracting gold has been explored over
the past 100 years as an alternative to cyanidation. The complexation of gold by
halide has long been recognised where Au(I) complex exists for iodide and
Au(ill) complexes exist for bromide and chloride. These systems are strongly
oxidizing and dissolution rates are typically several orders of magnitude faster
than those achieved with cyanide and oxygen under ambient conditions (Hiskey
and Atluri, 1988).
This is commonly known as the Plattner or theis process (Habashi, 1970), and
was applied extensively in the 1800's, prior to the introduction of cyanidation,
for the treatment of ores containing fine gold and occurring with sulphides,
which were not amenable to gravity concentration and amalgamation. Chloride
media have also been applied in electro-plating processes since the early 19th
century and for the oxidative pre-treatment of some carbonaceous refractory
ores. Although, chlorine/chloride is no longer used for leaching of primary ores,
and only limited to refining processes, several processes have been proposed for
the treatment of refractory or semi-refractory ores as an alternative to cyanide
(Marsden and House, 1992). More recently, chloride/chlorine (or hypochlorite)
system has been suggested by Fagan (Fagan, 1992), in an in-situ leaching
system for recovering gold from oxide gold ores as an answer to the major
operational difficulties faced with cyanide for such a hydrometallurgical
extraction process.
Gold will dissolve in the presence of chloride ion and a strong oxidant when the
solution is highly acidic (< pH:4.00). Dissolved chlorine, hypochlorous acid and
55
hypochlorite ion are all capable of oxidizing gold in chloride media (Hiskey and
Atluri, 1988). Nitric acid is also a sufficiently strong oxidant to dissolve gold in
chloride media, and this is applied as aqua regia (a mixture of 33% HNO 3 and
66% HCI) in a well-established technique for gold analysis. Fundamental
studies have shown that although the gold-chloro complex is more stable as
AuCl4-, gold can also exist as AuCl2-, especially at high chloride concentrations
( > 0.10 M Cl-). Thus:
(3-3.21)
The use of bromine/bromide for leaching gold from ores was first documented
by Shaeffer in a 1882 patent (Shaeffer, 1882). It was demonstrated that, ores
which contained gold, silver and copper can be successfully treated with
brominated aqueous solutions, after pre-treatment by roasting. Subsequent
patents by Hinman (Hinman, 1895) and Cassel (Cassel, 1903) described
processes for the application and regeneration of bromine which improved
Shaeffer's process. The next important development occurred in the 1940's when
Fink and Putnam (Fink and Putnam, 1942) in a patent, re-evaluated the effect of
various background solutions on the dissolution of gold using bromine. Bahl and
Leach in two patents (Bahl and Leach, 1980; Bahl and Leach, 1983 ), used a
mixture of bromide ions and elemental bromine to recover gold from gold-plated
materials.
The most suitable oxidants for bromide leaching are bromine, chlorine and
hypochlorite. In the presence of bromine, the reaction can be represented as
(Marsden and House, 1992):
E0=0.95 V (3-3.25)
(3-3.26)
Other reactions have also been described for the dissolution of gold m
bromine/bromide solutions, based on the reaction chemistry of bromine with
gold and aqueous bromide (Dadgar, 1989; Pesic and Sergent, 1991 ). For
example:
In practice, bromide leaches gold at acid, neutral or slightly alkaline pH. Gold
dissolution rate decreases linearly with pH increase in the range 7.00-9.50, and
there is no good dissolution above pH:10.0. Below pH:6.0, the gold dissolution
is insensitive to pH (Pesic and Sergent, 1990; Pesic and Sergent, 1991). The
gold dissolution in the bromine/bromide solution is also a function of
bromine/bromide concentration and temperature. Increasing bromine/bromide
concentration generally increased the rate of gold dissolution. For fixed bromine
reagent (eg., Geobrom 3400) concentration, gold dissolution improved as the
bromide concentration increased up to a value (between 5-20 gn, depending on
the type of ore) above which, bromide did not appear to be beneficial (Sergent et
al, 1988; Pesic et al, 1992). Temperature is not a critically important parameter
for dissolution of gold in bromine/bromide solutions. However, increasing
temperature increased gold dissolution under acidic conditions and certain
potential commercial applications would be favourable at high temperatures
(40°C - 50°C) (Pesic and Sergent, 1991; Pesic et al, 1992).
sulphur (12-15% )) and black sand concentrates (an "alluvial" gravel consisting
predominantly of magnetite and haematite and small amounts of nickel,
manganese, chromium and titanium) using bromine reagents have been reported
(Dadgar, 1989; Dadgar et al, 1990). In each case gold extractions ranged from
94-96%.
The various studies have also demonstrated that the recovery of gold from the
bromine/bromide leach solutions can be achieved readily by the different
conventional methods such as carbon adsorption, solvent extraction, ion
exchange, cementation or chemical precipitation. Reid and Mensah-Biney (Reid
and Mensah-Biney, 1988) evaluated several absorbents for gold bromide
leaching. Several ion-exchange resins and activated carbon were examined by
Reid, Bereuter, Mensah-Biney and Sergent (Reid et al, 1988). Dadgar (Dadgar,
1989) reported that any one of the conventional methods is a viable option for
gold recovery from Geobrom pregnant solutions with recoveries in excess of
99%. Several studies evaluated the loading characte1istics and adsorption
kinetics of gold-tetrabromide species onto ion-exchange resins and activated
carbon (Dadgar and Sanders, 1990; Mensah-Biney et al, 1991; Pesic and
Storhok, 1991; Dadgar and Howarth, 1992). Dadgar, Sanders, McKeown,
Sergent and Jacobson (Dadgar et al, 1990) also described the gold loadings and
recoveries with Geobrom 3400 from black sand concentrates using both ion-
exchange and solvent extraction methods. The commercial ion-exchange resins
PAZ-4, Dowex-21K, Amberlite XAD-7 and Great Lakes Chemical experimental
GLR-30 were evaluated in this work. Diethylene glycol dibutyl ether was used
for the solvent extraction studies. Most of these studies focused on the process
61
Activated carbon has also demonstrated its applicability for direct recovery of
gold from bromine/bromide solutions too. Gold adsorption is fast and follows
the first reaction order. Also, Cu, Fe, Mg and bromide ions which are most
probable to be present in the leach solutions do not interfere with the gold
recovery (Pesic and Storhok, 1991). However, recovery of gold from
bromine/bromide solutions by carbon in pulp is likely to be unsuitable (Filmer et
al, 1984) There is evidence that, the gold precipitated onto the activated carbon
is in the elemental form similar to that on ion-exchange resins and consequently
susceptible to significant gold losses through abrasion. Activated carbon is also
a well known scavenger for bromine gases. Another major drawback associated
with the use of activated carbon is the presence of residual bromine in the
solution, which suppresses the gold adsorption rate because of its competitive
62
The iodine/iodide system was suggested for extracting gold from vanous
sources. McGrew and Murphy in 1985 (McGrew and Murphy, 1985) claimed
for In-situ Corporation a patent which covered a process using iodine/iodide for
recovering gold by solution (in-situ) mining. Other patents were granted on
various iodine/iodide techniques for dissolving gold from electronic scraps
(Hormick, 1973; Wilson, 1973; Wilson, 1974; Falanga and MacDonald, 1982).
Several fundamental studies on gold extraction in iodide systems were also
reported (Davis, 1991; Davis and Tran, 1991; Hiskey and Qi, 1991; Davis et al,
1993).
(3-3.31)
with E0 = 0.578 V. The Eh-pH behaviour of Au-I-H2o system for 10- 2 M 1- and
[Au] = 10-5 M, reported by Hiskey and Atluri (Hiskey and Atluri, 1988),
illustrates the stability of the AuI2- complex with a solubility field up to about
pH=12. It also shows that above 0.69 V Au4- complex becomes stable with a
stability region greater than that of either AuCl4- or AuBq-. Nevertheless, the
gold iodide complexes are the most stable complexes of all the halogens m
aqueous environments.
Suitable oxidants for iodide leaching are iodine and hypochlorite. According to
Davis and Tran (Davis and Tran,1991), iodine performs better than hypochlorite
on a molar basis because higher gold dissolution rates can be achieved over a
wider pH range. In the presence of dissolved iodine of about 1o- 3 M, I3- ions
form according to the reaction (Hiskey and Atluri, 1988):
63
(3-3.32)
In this case, the tri-iodide ions serve as the oxidant for gold dissolution
according to the reaction:
2Au + l3- +I-= 2AuI2- (3-3.33)
The advantages claimed for the iodine/iodide leaching system are faster kinetics
(compared with cyanidation) (Davis and Tran, 1991), high solution stability
over a wide pH range, low oxidation potential, its effectiveness even at low
concentrations in leaching gold and which makes it selective in leaching other
minerals and low reactivity between iodine and sulphides (Hiskey and Atluri,
1988). However, the high cost of iodine (about $15.5/kg.) demands its efficient
recovery and recycling in a leaching process. It has been demonstrated that
iodine can readily be regenerated electrolytically from iodide ions in a
diaphragm cell and also with the potential for simultaneous recovery of gold
(McGrew and Murphy, 1985; Hiskey and Qi, 1990).
The recovery of gold from the iodine/iodide solutions, so far, has been by
electrolytic method and by precipitation especially with concentrated solutions,
by alkali solutions (or pH adjustment) (McGrew and Murphy, 1985; Falanga
64
and MacDonald, 1982; Murphy and Wyo, 1988; Hirako and Kikinzoku Kogyo,
1990).
3-3-2-3 Thiosulphate
(3-3.34)
Au + 4S2O3 2- + Cu(NH3)4 2+
= Au(S2O3)z 3- + 4NH3 + Cu(S2O3)z 3- (3-3.36)
(3-3.37)
65
(3-3.38)
A process for the treatment of sulphidic gold ores has been proposed whereby
thiosulphate ions are generated in-situ under alkaline oxidation conditions.
Nevertheless, there are no commercial scale ore treatments using the reagent at
present.
3-3-2-4 Thiocyanate
The rate of gold dissolution increases with increasing thiocyanate. The stability
of thiocyanate is strongly potential dependent, with stability achieved below
approximately 0.64 V. On the other hand, a potential greater than 0.64 V is
required to achieve satisfactory gold leaching rates at practical thiocyanate
concentrations. A compromise between these two requirements is necessary in
any leaching system. Increasing temperature increases the rate of thiocyanate
consumption and, in view of the high reagent consumption even at ambient
temperatures, elevating slurry temperature is not a viable option. A drop in gold
extraction has been reported at temperatures above 40°C. (Marsden and House,
1992). Thiocyanate forms complexes with cations (eg. Fe(SCN) 2+) and such
reactions could lead to high reagent consumptiom especially in acidic solutions
where the metal ion concentrations may be high.
66
3-3-2-5 Others
Recovery processes remove gold and other metal values from solutions into a
concentrated form. The high grade solid product may then either be sold directly
or treated further by refining to improve the grade. Recovery may be achieved
from a wide range of solutions, varying dramatically in gold concentration and
purity.
For this reaction, the operation is generally carried out under strongly reducing
conditions and at pH of about 10.5 - 11.5 so that zinc cyanide ions are the stable
species in solution. At a too high pH, zinc hydroxide and zincate ions may be
formed. Under optimum conditions the process, however, is extremely efficient
in precipitating gold from cyanide solutions to 0.01 mg/I level (Jha, 1984). The
generalised flowsheet for Merrill-Crowe process is represented in figure (3-4.1)
(Muhtadi, 1988; Avraamides, 1989).
The first step in this process is a solid/liquid separation to remove the bulk of
the leached solids. This is conducted initially in counter current thickeners
and/or in drum or belt vacuum filters. The pregnant solution produced by these
methods is then further clarified using sand clarifiers, leaf, candle (eg. stellar) or
plate-and-frame filters. The leach liquor or filtrate is then de-aerated in vacuum
towers, the cyanide strength raised, alkalinity adjusted to optimal level and lead
salt is added, followed by zinc dust. The gold is precipitated immediately as a
68
finely divided metal (together with excess zinc) and is separated from the barren
solution in pressure filters. The banen solution is returned to the mill for re-use.
Adamson (Adamson, 1972) reported that cla.1ification is required to remove the
slimy and colloidal constituents from the solution as those materials will inhibit
the precipitation of gold. De-aeration is necessary to minimize prima.1·ily the zinc
consumption and the re-dissolution of precipitated gold (Finkelstein, 1972;
Avraamides, 1989). Gold dissolves in the presence of oxygen and is most
effectively re-precipitated in its absence.
Leached Pulp
t
cco Solids to Tailings
Liquor
T
Filtration
l
l"Polisheci" Liquor
r
Deaeration
( Crowe To•,.,,er)
I
ILiquor
r
Barren Liquor --(-Zinc (po'wder, dust}
. ---< Gold Prec1r:l!tation
Return ro Mill --<-Pb(t10 3 ) 2 (ophonal}
BULL\Oi~
and
Therefore, the resulting potential for the reaction is 0.59 V with .1.G0 = -113.87
kJ/mole (Jackson, 1986). This value, (.1.G 0 ), indicates that the process is
thermodynamically feasible. In practice, the reaction rate depends on many
factors such as concentration of gold in solution, pH of solution, temperature,
concentration of free cyanide, rate of stirring and the presence of other metal
ions in the solution.
(3-4.4)
In dilute solutions, the gold concentration has a direct influence on the rate of
cementation. This is essentially a first-order effect controlled by the mass
transport with film diffusion of Au(CN)i- ions to the zinc surface under
conditions typical of those applied industrially (Nicol et al, 1979; Barin et al,
1980). Thus, the rate has a small positive temperature coefficient and the overall
activation energy is about 13 kJ/mol (Finkelstein, 1972). Other work has
indicated a deviation from this behaviour but this is most prevalent in high grade
70
These reactions, equations (3-4.5) and (3-4.6), markedly consume zinc. The
reaction (3-4.5) also consumes cyanide and might cause the passivation of the
zinc surface. Also, in the presence of dissolved oxygen, there is the tendency for
the re-dissolution of precipitated gold by the standard cyanide leaching
mechanism according to equation (3-3.5). However, if the precipitated gold
remains in electrical contact with the zinc, as is usually the case, it will form the
cathodic member of a local electrochemical cell, and zinc will preferentially
corrode. Nevertheless, the severity of the effect of dissolved oxygen depends on
the dissolved oxygen concentration and other precipitation conditions,
principally the temperature and gold concentration. In dilute gold cyanide
solutions at ambient temperatures, the effect becomes significant at dissolved
oxygen concentrations above 0.50-1.00 mg/I (Marsden and House, 1992). There
is some evidence that low concentrations of dissolved oxygen (<1.0 mg/I)
enhance gold precipitation from dilute gold cyanide solutions (Plaksin and
Budnikova, 1951 ). This is attributed to the depolarizing action of oxygen at
cathodic areas of the zinc surface by reaction with hydrogen that is evolved
(according to reactions (3-4.7) and (3-4.8)) (Finkelstein, 1972; Marsden and
House, 1992):
The beneficial effect of lead ions on gold precipitation from dilute gold cyanide
solutions at low temperatures has been evaluated in several studies (Leblanc,
1942; Nicol et al, 1979; Paul and Howarth, 1986; Nicol et al, 1987; Miller et al,
1990; Oo and Tran, 1991). Most studies agreed that lead affects the cementation
process in many ways. In the presence of lead the passivation of zinc due to the
formation of zinc hydroxide is reduced. However, the lead addition rate is
critical and is most effective at a Pb:Zn weight ratio of between 1:7 and 1:10.
Pb 2+ concentrations between 0.001 and 0.01 g/1 are optimal for the process from
solutions containing 1.0-10.0 git Au (Marsden and House, 1992). Nicol,
Schaich, Balestra and Hedegus (Nicol et al, 1979) showed that an increase in the
rate of cementation by 30 % was observed when 5 mg/I lead as nitrate was
added to the solution containing 5 mg/I gold. Oo and Tran (Oo and Tran, 1991)
also showed that the addition of 3 mg/I Pb to a 5 mg/I gold solution maintains
the cementation reaction in the diffusion-controlled zone and makes it more
effective. At a temperature of 40°C or higher the addition of lead (at 3 mg/I Pb)
decreases the zinc consumption as the hydrogen evolution reaction is
suppressed. Excess additions are detrimental and can completely stop the
precipitation, probably due to complete coating of the zinc surface by a lead
film. Other divalent metal cations, such as Hg, Th, Bi, and Cd at very low
concentrations have also been shown to enhance the cementation rate (McIntyre
and Peck, 1976). Although, Nicol, Schaich, Balestra and Hedegus (Nicol et al,
1979) and Oo (Oo, 1990) also reported that Cu, Ni, and Co have no effect on
the cementation rate, it can be expected that the presence of these metals will
result in higher zinc consumption as well as in poorer grade of gold product.
According to Leblanc (Leblanc, 1942) and Plaksin, Suvorovskaya and Bunikova
(Plaksin et al, 1948), the presence of copper cyanide at a concentration of
6.0x 10-3 M adversely affects the cementation process. Paul (Paul, 1986) also
reported that the presence of common impurities such as cyanide complexes of
iron, nickel and copper increased the consumption of zinc but did not affect the
efficiency. Many of the common constituents of gold cyanidation solutions also
influence the cementation reaction. According to Finkelstein (Finkelstein, 1972),
73
(2) For high-grade solutions above approximately 10-15 git gold equivalent.
(3) For small operations recovering less than 25 ounces per day of total precious
metal which cannot justify the relatively-high cost of carbon elution and
reactivation equipment.
The alternate scheme of adsorption of gold and silver on activated charcoal from
pregnant solutions has found a worldwide acceptance in the last decade. This
preference over the Merrill-Crowe zinc dust precipitation system is primaiily
due to more effective recovery of precious metals from lower grade leach
solutions emanating from lower grade ores and lower capital and operating
costs. A majority of the new plants designed in the last ten yeai·s in the United
States, Australia and South Africa incorporate one or the other modifications of
the carbon based gold recovery. These modifications include Carbon-in-Leach
(CIL), Carbon-in-Pulp (CIP) and Cai·bon-in-Column (CIC).
The CIP process has been used commercially and is applied to slimes or ground
ores and calcines cyanided in agitated tanks. The biggest advantage of this
75
The normal ranges of carbon size from 1.2 x 2.4 to 1.7 x 3.4 mm have proved to
be effective in practice depending on CIL, CIP or CIC system used. While fine
particles give faster kinetics, they are more likely to cause high pressure drops in
loading and elution columns. The finer particles can also increase gold loss in
tailings in CIP operations. The normal loading varies from 600 to 10,000g
gold/silver per ton of carbon. The loaded carbon can then be stripped readily
using hot caustic-cyanide (1 % NaOH, 0.1 to 0.2% NaCN) at about 95-98°C at
atmospheric pressure. The kinetics of stripping is slow under these conditions
and may require 48 hours for completing a stripping cycle (Zadra et al, 1952).
The slow kinetics necessitates large size stripping plants and represents a
significant lock-up of gold values in the plant. The elution rate may be
accelerated by refluxing and recycling hot methanol at temperatures around 60
to 80°C with a stripping time of 4 to 6 hours. The elution of loaded carbon may
also be enhanced by using pressure elution (50 to 70 psig) at about 120 to 130°C
in 6 to 8 hours. An interesting variation of this method involves the pretreatment
of the loaded carbon with a strong cyanide solution (10% NaCN stabilized with
1% NaOH) followed by elution with water at high temperature (110°C) in a
pressure vessel. It is claimed that elution can be completed in a few hours. The
Anglo elution process virtually uses all the South African plants and many
Australian plants since the mid-1970' s.
The gold/silver values from the rich stripping solutions (5.0 oz per ton) can be
recovered by electrowinning on steel cathodes using 2.50 to 3.50 V per cell and
amperage consistent with 30 to 40 percent current efficiency (Bhappu, 1986).
Electrowinning is the most common recovery method used. However, there are
a few plants which have adopted zinc dust cementation in preference to
electrowinning (Jha, 1984). It is claimed that this process reduces the high gold
inventory normally associated with electrolytic gold deposition. Carbon is
usually acid washed (3% v/v HCl at ambient temperature) to remove lime and/or
certain metal complexes prior to elution in non-oxidizing atmosphere for about
half-hour, generally in an indirectly heated rotary kiln (Jha, 1984 ).
Studies pe1formed at United States Bureau of Mines (Hussey et al, 1982) and at
Anglo American Research Laboratories (Davidson et al, 1982) have confirmed
that the equilibrium capacity of carbon to load gold is related to pH, gold
concentration, and free cyanide concentration. Typical isotherms are almost
linear between equilibrium concentrations of 10.0 and 0.10 mg/I gold in
77
3-4-3 Electrowinning
Electrowinning for recovery of gold from cyanide solutions was practised in the
early days of the development of the cyanidation process. It was then abandoned
due to extremely low current efficiencies experienced with conventional cells.
During the past ten years, as the carbon adsorption process proliferated through
the gold mining industry, interest in electrolysis/electrowinning has been
renewed for the treatment of the high-grade strip solutions (carbon eluates). The
popularity of the process stems from the advantage of a greater selectivity for
gold and silver from copper in comparison to zinc-dust cement.at.ion and hence
the product is generally of higher purity which simplifies the melting and
fluxing operation to produce dore bullion. Also, electrons are used to reduce
gold directly and as such no new chemicals or metals are introduced into the
process (Jha, 1984; Marsden and House, 1992).
The Zadra type cell (designed by the United States Bureau of Mines and
developed by Homestake Mine) consists of three concentric containers, the
cathodic compartment, the overflow container, and the outside container which
are placed in cascade and connected in series. The inside container is perforated
and contains steel wool to serve as the cathode. The anode is made of stainless
steel screen placed in the overflow compartment. The cyanide solution is
allowed to enter and flow at right angles to the flow of current, upwards and
through the steel wool into the anode compartment. The possibility of the
electrolyte by-passing the cathode bed is minimized by introducing it inside the
bed by means of a delivery tube provided with orifices along its length (Jha,
1984). The Anglo-American cell (devised by the Anglo American Research
Laboratory of South Africa) is a modified version of cylindrical cell. A strong
alkaline solution circulates through the anode compartment and the pregnant
electrolyte circulates through the cathode compartment. In the second type of
cell design developed by the National Institute for Metallurgy, South Africa, the
cell is of rectangular shape and the solution flows parallel to the passage of
current. The Mintek cell consists of a stainless steel rectangular tank enclosing a
number of removable anodes (stainless steel 316) and cathodes (filled with steel
wool) positioned alternately within the tank so that each cathode is effectively
'sandwiched' between two anodes. The fronts and backs of the cathodes are
perforated so that the electrolyte can flow down the length of the cell through
each alternate anode and cathode (Paul et al, 1983). The design features of the
cell, materials of construction and operating results have been reported in detail
(Paul et al, 1983). Other cell designs have also been tested on pilot plant scale.
The Chemelec cell originally designed for recovering metal from electroplating
rinse water (Paul, 1986) was also tested with CIP eluates. The cell consists of a
tank containing stainless steel cathodes, platinized titanium anodes and a
fluidized glass bead bed between the electrodes. This design claims to yield a
high purity gold deposit which can be easily stripped from the cathode sheets.
Another development being pursued in Australia involves the use of the Siltech,
an Australian-designed electrolytic cell for recovering silver from spent
photographic solutions but no Siltech has been put into practice.
Typically, gold is electrowon on knitted or woven steel wool. Like any other
electrowinning process, gold is electrolytically displaced from the aqueous
alkaline cyanide solution. Oxidation reactions taking place at the anode generate
electrons which are consumed at the cathode to deposit gold. In alkaline cyanide
solution, the major reaction at the anode is the oxidation of water to oxygen
represented as:
Side reactions involve the deposition of other metals (ie. Ag, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Fe,
Zn) as well as evolution of Hz (according to reaction 3-4.11) and the reduction
of 02 (according to reaction 3-4.12) at the cathode:
The anodic reactions may include the kinetically slower oxidation of cyanide
ions to cyanate according to (Kirk and Foulkes, 1984; Muir, 1982; Brandon et
al, 1987; Marsden and House, 1992):
The variables affecting these reactions are the cell voltages, current density,
solution flow rate (electrolyte hydrodynamics) and solution composition. The
voltage and current that must be applied to a cell for most efficient gold
recovery depends on the cell design and the solution conditions, including
conductivity, pH, temperature and concentration of all ionic species (or
impurities) present. In industrial cells voltages of the order 2-4 V are applied to
allow for solution losses and side reactions (Raub, 1984).
The operating solution flow rate is a balance between single-pass efficiency and
the total volume that must be treated to recover a fixed amount of gold. The
single pass efficiency decreases with increasing solution flowrate. Beyond some
velocity, the physical abrasion of gold may also become significant. Usually
solution flowrates of 38-150 l/min in the range 250-500 l/m 2 cathode are
employed. The efficiency of electrowinning will depend on whether using
constant current or constant voltage electrolysis. This basically determines the
size of the electrowinning cells for a given production rate (Paul et al, 1983; Jha,
1984).
The eluates from CIP plants are relatively low gold (and silver) cyanide
solutions (ie. 100-500 mg/1) containing some free cyanide ions and sodium
82
hydroxide (Jha, 1984; Avraamides and Haynes, 1988). Paul, Filmer and Nicol
(Paul et al, 1983) showed that deposition efficiency remained practically
constant at about 75% when the gold concentration was in the range 10 to 200
mg/I. However, this efficiency decreased at both lower and higher
concentrations. Below 10 ppm, the deposition potential for gold shifts
cathodically (-0.12 V per 10-fold decrease in gold concentration) and an
increasing fraction of the cathode bed becomes electrochemically inactive
towards the reduction of the aurocyanide ions. For concentrations above 154
mg/I, they showed that the electrochemical reactions such as reduction of
oxygen and silver compete for the limited amount of available current thereby
decreasing the deposition efficiency, but it is still not clear why oxygen and
silver will compete at high gold concentrations. The presence of sodium
hydroxide (NaOH) increases the conductivity of the solution and thereby the
single-pass extraction efficiency. The solution conductivity determines the
ohmic drop across the cell, and therefore the potential distribution throughout
the cathode (ie. electroactive cathode volume) (Paul et al, 1983; Brandon et al,
1987). The higher the conductivity, the lower the electrical loss (or electrical by-
passing) in the solution. Gold recovery (or single-pass extraction efficiency)
also decreases with increasing free cyanide concentration (Brandon et al, 1987).
Harrison and Thompson (Harrison and Thompson, 1973) showed that an
increase in cyanide concentration (ie. from 5 g/1 to 50 g/1 NaCN) shifts the
potential for deposition cathodically by approximately 0.2 V. Thus, a higher
voltage must be applied at higher concentration to ensure that the system is
operated at, or slightly above, the limiting current (Marsden and House, 1992).
are typically achieved (Marsden and House, 1992). The gold-to-steel wool mass
ratio is therefore another important variable affecting the single-pass deposition
efficiency. In addition, pH is also important for electrode stability. Below a pH
of approximately 12.5, the electrodes (eg. stainless steel) corrode in solution.
Elevated electrolyte temperature will also increase the deposition rate and
improve the cell current efficiency. This is due to an increase in solution
conductivity, higher diffusion coefficient of gold(I) cyanide ions and a lower
solubility of oxygen in the solution at higher temperature (Paul et al, 1983 ).
Therefore a minimal cooling of eluate solution should be allowed before
electrowinning (Jha, 1984; Marsden and House, 1992). However, these effects
are quite small, particularly when compared with effects of gold concentration,
the degree of mixing of the electrolyte and the cathode surface area (Marsden
and House, 1992).
precipitation circuits (Paul et al, 1983; Brandon et al, 1987; Marsden and
House, 1992).
(1) The elution and regeneration processes for the resins may be simpler than for
activated carbon, making RIP the favourite for smaller plants (Fleming and
Nicol, 1981; Fleming, 1982).
(2) The RIP process may maintain its efficiency when organic matter (flotation
reagents, ash char, etc.) are present in the pulp (Fleming, 1982; Gupta and
O'Neil, 1982).
Either strong or weak base resins may be used as presented in the loading and
stripping equations, respectively:
and
R Au(CN)i + NH4SCN i RSCN + NH4 Au(CN)i (3-4.15)
The strong-base resins contain quartennary amine functional groups and are
ionized over the full pH scale. They extract aurocyanide ions by an exchange
mechanism. Typical resins have total capacities of 0. 7 gram gold per gram dry
resin. Gold complexes tend to be displaced by copper cyanide complexes,
Cu(CN)42- and by iron complexes, Fe(CN)6 2- so that the loading will be
affected by the presence of these complexes. The weak-base anion exchange
resins exist with several different functional groups consisting of primary,
secondary, and tertiary amine groups. In their free-base form these resins are
uncharged. It is therefore necessary for the resin to be protonated prior to the
extraction of aurocyanide ions. Generally the protonation to a pH value between
7.0 and 9.0 is adequate to achieve maximum gold extraction.
(3-4.16)
In general, the stripping of the loaded gold/silver values from the resins has
proved to be somewhat difficult. Weak base resins may be eluted by dilute
caustic solution at ambient temperature. On the other hand, the strong base
resins require a concentrated NH4SCN or Zn(CN)4 2- solutions as reported by
MINTEK, South Africa (Fleming and Nicol, 1981 ). In this case, the resin needs
to be regenerated using acid which breaks down the zinc cyanide complex
producing HCN gas which must be then collected and re-adsorbed into caustic
soda for recycling.
86
(3-4.17)
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
4-1 GENERAL/fHEORY
Mathematically, the flux (mass transport) to the electrode is described (in one
dimension) by the Nernst-Planck equation:
J( x,t) -__ D -
bC(x,t)
- - _ ~DC( x,t ) -
b<j)(x,t)
-- + C( x,t )vx (x,t ) (4-1.1)
bx RT bx
where J is the flux (mol cm-2 s- 1); Dis the diffusion coefficient (cm 2 s- 1), C is
the concentration (mol cm-3 ), <j> is the electrostatic potential, and v x is the
hydrodynamic velocity. In simple terms, this partial differential equation states
that the flux of material toward the electrode is proportional either to the slope
of the C or <j> profiles or the v x profile (Maloy, 1983 ).
reduced form is stable and the oxidized form tends to be reduced. Actually, in a
zone about 100 mV wide centred on E 0 , statistical equilibrium of electrons on
the electrode and on the species in the solution permits mixtures of oxidized and
reduced forms with appreciable amounts of both species (Faulkner, 1983). As an
oxidation or reduction predominates at the electrode, a flow of electrons or ions
(either to or from the electrode) gives rise to a cmTent which is related to the
rate of the electrochemical reaction.
(4-1.2)
~G = µ.J -µ.:::::: µ -µ a
I - C
(4-1.3)
where µc and µa are the cathodic and anodic chemical potentials for the total
process. At equilibrium the chemical potentials are equal and ~ G = 0, resulting
in zero net current density.
Figure (4-1.1) depicts the flow of electrons and ions between the electrode and
electrolyte. The net current density / is the sum of the partial current densities / +
90
and/- (Vetter, 1959). If II-1 > I+' I is negative, and the net process is cathodic.
If II-I < I+' I is positive, and the net process is anodic. It follows that for a net
cathodic process the potential of the electrode E is less than £ 0 and for a net
anodic process E > E 0 , where Eis the voltage when there is a net current density
and £ 0 is the voltage when the net current density is zero (equilibrium value).
By definition, the deviation (difference) of the electrode potential E from the
equilibrium value £ 0 is the overvoltage 'Tl:
11= E - Eo (4-1.4)
and is positive for anodic cmTents and negative for cathodic currents. Thus, the
overvoltage is a function of the net current density. At the equilibrium condition
where the partial current densities are equal, E = E0 and 'Tl = 0. The magnitude
of these mutually compensating current densities at equilibrium is called the
exchange-current density, / 0 . The overvoltage may result from any one of then
steps in the overall process.
(+)
electrons
{-)
I.+ I_ - I < 0
E < E0
I On$
I+)
electron,
.
I+l-I>O
-
E > E
•
I On I
Figure (4-1.1) Flow of electrons and ions between electrode and electrolyte
for net cathodic and net anodic processes (Wadsworth,
1969).
92
If the anodic and cathodic areas are separate and distinguishable but electrically
in contact, the system represents a galvanic couple. If the anodic and cathodic
areas are part of the same surface, so that A = Aa + Ac, the system represents a
corrosion couple. Under steady-state conditions:
(4-1.7)
If/ is the electron current resulting from the transfer of a metal cation of charge
z, the rate process for an oxidation/reduction reaction can be formulated in
terms of the anodic (or anodic partial current density) and cathodic (or cathodic
partial current density) directions of the reaction. The anodic partial current
density t, and the cathodic partial current density /_ are given by:
--i- kT
I = zF'A,C+ - K (4-1.8)
+ h
and
I= -zFAC+
f-+ -kTK (4-1.9)
- h
~ 7-
where C+ and C+ are the concentrations of the activated complex for the
cathodic and anodic directions respectively, A is the distance between the
minima on either side of the transition (activated) state, K is the transmission
coefficient, k is the Boltzman constant, h is the Planck constant, and T is the
absolute temperature. Assuming the transmission coefficient to be unity. the net
cmTent density I for the reaction is given by:
7-
I= -zFA ( C+-C+
f-+) -kT (4-1.10)
h
7- ~ 7- ~
If C + > C + the electrode reaction is a net anodic process and if C + < C + the
electrode reaction is a net cathodic process. Considering the equilibrium
established with the activated complex for both the cathodic and anodic
directions of the reaction, the equilibrium constants are given by:
94
f+ f-+
~+ C+ ( ~G+)
K+ =-=exp - - - (4-1.11)
Cc RT
and
-t.. ~+
~+ C+ ( ~G+)
K+ =-=exp - - - (4-1.12)
Ca RT
where Cc is the concentration of the metal ion at the Outer Helmholtz plane and
Ca is the effective surface concentration of the metal sites capable of reacting in
~+ +-+
the anodic direction. If ~G 0 + and ~G 0 + are the activation free energies for the
reactions in the anodic and cathodic directions when E is zero, then the specific
rate constants for the anodic and cathodic reactions, k: and k~ are given by the
following expressions from transition state theory (Rieger, 1987):
(4-1.13)
-t..
K! = C+
C
=k'(ex [azFE])(~)
a p RT kT
(4-1.14)
a
and
(4-1.15)
(4-1.17)
(4-1.18)
azF ] [ (1-a)zF ])
1=10 ( exp [ -11 -exp ----11 (4-1.19)
RT RT
RT RT
11 = - ln 10 + - ln I (4-1.20)
aF aF
11 = RT In I + RT In / (4-1.21)
(1-a)F O (1-a)F
such that:
where b = -(a/In lo)= RT/zF and a'= a for anodic currents and a' =(1-a) for
cathodic currents (Wadsworth, 1969). For smaller currents both terms of
96
(1-a)zF
l=-10 exp [ - - - 1 1 ] ( I-exp [ -~G J) (4-1.24)
RT RT
where ~G is the free energy change for the total cathodic process. At ~G = 0,
equilibrium is attained and I = 0. It is possible to estimate the importance of
back reactions for the total process using equation (4-1. 23). For practical
application to metallurgical systems back reactions would be negligible for
values of ~G such that exp(~G/RT) < 0.01 which corresponds approximately
to ~ G values where ~ G < 1OT, or ~ G < -3 kcal/mole at room temperature. For
sufficiently small overvoltages as 11-----tO, zF11-----t ~G and equation (4-1.23)
becomes:
1=10 zF
-n
-I ~G (4-1.25)
RT 01
- 0 RT
a F (2-a )F
21 0 M(exp[ ____M_11]-exp[ - M 11])
I= ' RT RT (4-1.27)
Io,M
1 + --exp (1 + ae - aM)F ]
[ - -----=------==------11
l 0 ,M RT
97
aF (2-a)
21 0 M(exp[-11]-exp[ ---11])
I= ' RT RT (4-1.28)
loM F
1+-·-exp[--]
Ioe RT
aF ] (4-1.29)
I = 21 0 ,M exp[ RT 11
I= -21 (1-a)F ,, ]
exp [ ____
o,e RT 'I (4-1.30)
If the exchange current density l 0 ,efor electron transfer is very smaller than the
exchange current density l 0 ,M for the ion transfer reaction equation (4-1.28)
becomes for cathodic current densities and small anodic current densities:
In p1inciple, all electrode reactions occur to some degree at all potentials, but in
some cases the rate is too slow to be interesting. The electron transfer rate
increases exponentially with the applied potential. This is a very powerful tool
and a unique feature of experimental electrochemistry. The electrochemical cell,
consisting of two or more conducting electrodes, is an extremely versatile
device, the basic properties of which give rise to experimental observables.
98
4-2-1 Voltammetry
Studies in this field began in 1897 with the work by Salomen (Salomen, 1897;
Salomen, 1898) who obtained current-voltage curves for the electrolysis of
silver ion and indicated the existence of limiting currents. Caspari (Caspari,
1899) examined the anodic oxidation of bromide and iodide at platinum
electrodes. Technical interest in the electrolytic reduction of organic compounds
had already developed at this time. Haber (Haber, 1900), and Russ (Russ, 1903)
examined the electrochemical properties of gold, platinum and other less noble
metal electrodes with respect to organic reductions and oxidations. The effect of
pretreatment techniques were noted qualitatively by these workers. Theoretical
studies of rotated electrodes and stirred solutions developed with the work of
Nernst and MeITiam (Nernst and MeITiam, 1905) and Brunner (Brunner, 1906),
among others.
affect the behaviour of the electrode of interest and may be any desired inert
electrode (ie. does not produce substances by electrolysis that will reach the
working-electrode smface and cause interfering reactions there). It is frequently
placed in a compartment separated from the working-electrode compartment by
a sintered-glass disk or other separator (Bard and Faulkner, 1980). The counter
electrode merely serves to complete the electrochemical cell. The potential of
the working electrode is measured relative to a separate reference electrode, the
third electrode of this system, positioned with its tip near the working electrode.
The internationally accepted primary reference is the standard hydrogen
electrode (SHE) or normal hydrogen electrode (NHE), which has all
components at unit activity:
Its potential is 0.242 V(versus NHE). For certain purposes the silver-silver
chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrode is useful. Mercury-mercurous sulphate and lead
amalgam-lead sulphate half-cells have been used (Adams, 1969). The
anangement of the reference electrode is such that it does not pass cuITent and
hence its potential remains constant and equal to its open-circuit value. This
provides an invariant reference point against which working electrodes can be
measured. Also, the three-electrode configuration avoids the problem of
reference electrode polarization and somewhat reduces the iR contribution to the
measured potential (Bard and Faulkner, 1980; Rieger. 1987). However, iR drop
often remains a problem and most commercial electrochemical instruments
contain a circuit which partially compensates for iR drop by electrically
subtracting an adjustable voltage, proportional to the cuITent, from the measured
cell potential (Rieger, 1987).
101
The rotating disc electrode (RDE) is the most practical f01m of electrode for
which a completely rigorous hydrodynamic treatment can be given. The theory
of a rotating disc electrode applies to thin plane surface, so large in diameter
that the edges may be neglected with respect to the total surface. This plane is
rotated with constant angular velocity about an axis perpendicular to the plane
such that the experiment is done under steady-state (ie., time independent)
conditions. The rotational motion stirs the solution so that diffusion problem is
reduced to transport across a stagnant layer at the electrode surface. This
electrode is easy to construct and consists of a disc of the electrode material
imbedded in a rod of an insulating material. A commonly used form involves a
platinum wire sealed in glass tubing with the sealed end ground smooth and
perpendicular to the rod axis. More frequently the metal is imbedded into teflon,
epoxy resin, or another plastic. Although the literature suggests that the shape of
the insulating mantle is critical and that the exact alignment of the disc is
important (Riddiford, 1966), in practice what is more imp01tant is that there is
no leakage of the solution between the electrode material and the insulator (Bard
and Faulkner, 1980). The rod is attached to a motor directly by a chuck or by a
flexible rotating shaft or pulley arrangement and rotated at a certain frequency, f
(revolution per second). The electrical connection is made to the electrode by
means of a brush contact usually of carbon-silver (Graphalloy) materials. The
full details of the construction and application of RDEs have been given m
excellent reviews by Riddiford (Riddiford, 1966) and Adams (Adams, 1969).
pump which moves solution up from below and then away from the electrode.
Near the surface of the rotating disc:
(4-3.3)
where ro is the angular velocity of the disc given by: ro = 2rcf radians/sec, v is
the kinematic viscosity of the solution in cm 2/sec, 80 is hydrodynamic (or
momentum or Prandtl) boundary layer thickness and roughly represents the
thickness of the layer of liquid dragged by the rotating disc (Bard and Faulkner,
1980).
The region close to the surface of the rotating disc electrode can be considered
as two regions in order to describe qualitatively the mass transport of species to
the rotating surface. For a certain fluid having a finite viscosity, the solution
contacting the rotating disc adheres to its surface and has the same velocity
vectors as the rotating disc. In this adherent layer diffusion is responsible for the
mass transport of reactant species. The thickness of diffusion layer, measured
perpendicular from the rotating disc surface is inversely proportional to the
square root of rotational speed. Levich (Levich, 1942) showed that for a rotating
disc, under laminar flow conditions:
(4-3.4)
For a reaction controlled by only mass transfer (reversible), the limiting cmTent
is also given by Levich (Levich, 1942):
2 I I
iL = 0.62nFACbD 3 v- 0 w~ (4-3.5)
(4-3.6)
where r is the disc radius in cm and is the total radius of working plus non
working area.
(4-3.7)
RT (iLc -i)
E = E 112 + - I n . '. (4-3.8)
nF (1-1L.J
where iL,c is the limiting cmTent for a cathodic reaction and it,a is the limiting
cunent for an anodic reaction and:
E o RT DR½3
½- = E --ln(-)
nF D
(4-3.9)
0
Thus, the shape of the wave for a totally reversible reaction is independent of m.
However, since iL varies as w½, i at any potential should vary as w½. A
deviation of a plot of i versus w½ from a straight line that intersects the origin
suggests some kinetic step involved in the electron transfer reaction.
104
The most valuable applications of the RDE have been to investigations of the
rates and mechanisms of electrode processes. For a first-order electrode reaction
which is controlled both by mass transport and charge transfer, Levich equation
gives:
(4-3.10)
where k is the heterogeneous rate constant at the given potential. This relation
can be written as:
. nFADCb
I=--- (4-3.11)
8+(0/k)
where 8 is as defined in equation (4-3.4). The other symbols have been defined
in equation (4-3 .5) and have their usual significance. The equation (4-3 .10) or
(4-3 .11) is useful in defining the conditions for kinetic or mass transfer control
at the RDE depending on the relative magnitudes of 8 and the ratio D/k. If
8=10-3 cm, then for values of k > 10- 1 cm/sec, the term D/k can dropped to give
the familiar relation for the limiting current of a diffusion-controlled process at
the RDE, ie., equation (4-3.5). On the other hand, if under the same
experimental conditions, k < 1o-4 cm/sec, then 8 is negligible with respect to
D/k and equation (4-3.11) becomes:
i = nFAkCb (4-3.12)
and the observed cmTent in this case is independent of the mass transfer. ie., the
cmTent is entirely controlled by charge transfer or under kinetic (or activation)
control. The rate constant can be evaluated from equations (4-3 .11) and (4-
3. l 2). Thus if the RDE is to be used for kinetic measurements D/k should be
small. Under mass transfer conditions k can be calculated from:
(4-3.13)
105
(4-3.14)
where m is the order of reaction, o is the thickness of the diffusion layer defined
in equation (4-3 .4 ), and j is the flux expressed as:
(4-3.15)
From equation (4-3.5), the limiting current density (mA/cm 2), is given by:
2 _.1 .1 b
iL,j = 0.62nFD/v 6 co 2 Cj (4-3.16)
This equation (4-3.16) expresses a relation between the six quantities iL,j, n, Dj,
v, co, C/, any one of which could be determined experimentally by means of
the RDE. However, v and co are better determined directly. The evaluation of
the bulk concentration of the species j offers obvious analytical applications.
The electrode could be used for amperometric titrations to determine species
concentrations. The possibility of computing iL,j from a knowledge of the
remaining quantities has two advantages. First, such a computation avoids the
necessity for polarizing the electrode to the point where iL,j could be determined
experimentally. This may be undesirable in practice since the polarization may
result in changes in the activity of the electrode or in the case of
electrodeposition, in too heavy a deposit for satisfactory kinetic study. Second,
it may not be possible to determine the limiting current by direct measurement,
either because of the onset of a second electrode process or because the limiting
106
(4-4.1)
(4-4.2)
107
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E..,• I
T/2
'\
T) Eh(volt~)
.. Z I
M +ze--+-M
""i 2 (E)
I 2~·+2e _.._ H2
I
I
I
For a symmetrical energy barrier, the transfer coefficient equals 0.5. Setting,
IM 1 = -IM 2 equations (4-4.1) and (4-4.2) can be solved to give:
(4-4.3)
and the complex nature of the mixed potential is revealed. The expression can
be greatly simplified if the back reaction is considered negligible, that is large
overvoltages exist. In this case the expression becomes:
(4-4.4)
The hydrogen atoms then migrate on the surface and form hydrogen molecules:
2M-H ~ M· H2 (4-4.7a)
M • H2 ~ M + H2 (g) (4-4.8)
If step (4-4.7a) is the rate limiting, in the absence of double-layer effects, the
anodic and cathodic transfer coefficients should be near ½. The data given in
table (4-4.1) are consistent with step (4-4.7a) being rate limiting for Pb, Hg, Zn,
Sn, Cd, Cu, Fe, and Ni. If step (4-4.7b) is rate limiting, the cathodic transfer
coefficient should be approximately ½ and the anodic transfer coefficient
should be about½- Step (4-4.7b) is probably rate limiting for Pt, Au, Mo, and
W. A strong M-H bond is expected to make step (4-4.6) more favourable but
hinder step (4-4.7a) or (4-4.7b). Conversely, a weak M-H bond would make step
(4-4.6) slow and (4-4.7a) or (4-4.7b) fast.
anodic
-c.n
w I
0 +r
cathod ic M-M
C
-Q)
0
Q_
diffusi on
log
Figure (4-5.1) Typica l polariz ation curves for an arbitra ry metal showin g
cathod ic and anodic reactio n (Powe r, 1975).
112
11 = a±blogi (4-5.1)
where a and b are constants and 11 is the overpotential. Alternatively, the Tafel
equation can be written from the Butler-Volmer equation (4-1.14) in terms of
the exchange-current density as defined in equation (4-1.20). The polarization
curves can be determined experimentally or calculated, provided the exchange-
current density and transfer coefficient are known.
~ = b[loo(iL) + loo(iL) a]
0 b. C b.
(4-5.2)
lo lo
Eo .c
--
V)
---w>
-0
c
-d)
0
a_
0 6
log ilia
Figur e (4-5.2) Idealized Evan s diagr am show ing the transi tion from
mass trans fer contr ol to electr ochem ical reacti on
contr ol (Pow er, 1975)
CHAPTER FIVE
CEMENTATION
5-1 INTRODUCTION/DEFINITION
According to Power and Ritchie (Power and Ritchie, 1975), the word
"cementation" used widely in literature for metal displacement reaction is
believed to be originated from the Spanish word "cementacion" which means
precipitation. Cementation has been known for centuries and is still an
important operation in hydrometallurgical processing. It is used extensively as a
means of primary metal recovery in the case of cadmium, copper, gold, and
silver, and as an electrolyte purification technique in electrolytic recovery
systems. Undoubtedly copper cementation from dump leach liquors represents
the greatest production of industrial cementation system. An important example
of its purification application process can be found during the electrolytic
production of zinc and nickel. In such cases a number of metallic impurities,
particularly Cu and Cd, are removed either by zinc dust for electrolytic zinc
production or by metallic nickel for electrolytic nickel production. Other
examples for this type of reaction include recovery of Bi, Ge, TI and Re from
their respective solutions, and recovery of Zr, Ti and Be from their respective
melts. Fe, Al, Zn, Mg and Na amalgam are used as common precipitants.
115
5-2 THEORYffHERMODYNAMICS
Thus a condition for the displacement reaction is that the electrode (reduction)
potential of pure N° in the solution of N°+ ions is more negative than that of
pure M0 in the solution of Mm+ ions, ie.,:
(5-2.3)
or
(5-2.4)
where E0 (MID+fMO) and E0 (N°+fN°) are the standard electrode potentials, and
a(MID+) and a(N°+) are the activities of the cations in solution. If the reaction is
between metals of equal valence and goes to completion at room temperature
[say a(N°+)/a(MID+) = 1010 at equilibrium]:
(5-2.5)
The anodic and cathodic reactions are shown in figure (5-2.la), in which it has
been assumed for simplicity that no redeposition of metal N° has taken place.
116
The reaction, at least in a formal sense, can be considered as occurring via five
steps as shown in figure (5-2.1 b ):
In principle, any one of these steps may be rate controlling. If the first or the last
step governs the reaction, it is said to be under diffusion control. If any of the
other steps is rate determining, the reaction is said to be under surface or
chemical control. Mixed control occurs when a diffusion step and a surface step
have comparable rates.
l
calrod,c : , \
s i \ .z
A Bn+ A
- - - - - -
Q
B
_____,.
anodic SI\ Q
It can also be seen that the anode and cathode are virtually shorted, and are
therefore at practically the same potential. This is a mixed potential, which
means that the cathodic process is taking place at a more negative potential than
the equilibrium potential of metal M0 in a solution of its ions, and so is
essentially one of electrodeposition. Correspondingly, the anodic process is
essentially one of dissolution. The complexity of the metal displacement
reaction is partly due to the fact that the metal surface is simultaneously subject
to deposition and dissolution (Power and Ritchie, 1975).
118
5-3 ELECTROCHEMISTRY
The rotating disc system is unique for kinetic studies of cementation reaction
with laminar flow being maintained up to quite high Reynolds numbers (of
order of 105 for a smooth disc). Furthermore, the hydrodynamic flow in this
system is well defined and can be calculated from first principles as done by
Levich (Levich, 1942). As a result of this, the rate constant for a reaction which
is controlled by ion transport to the surface of a rotating disc is given by
equation (4-3.13). This provides additional insight into distinguishing the rate-
limiting step for cementation reaction.
Unlike the rotating disc system, the flow regune of the rotating cylinder
becomes turbulent at very low Reynolds numbers,
For a given system the actual coefficient is dependent on reactor design and
stirrer speed, or power input, and the effects of particle size, diffusivity, and
similar variables on the actual coefficient can be predicted from their effects on
121
the minimum coefficient or from figure (5-3. l). Haniott et al (Harriott et al,
1983) described a method for prediction of mass transfer coefficients in stined
reactors which has been reviewed (Wadsworth and Miller, 1979). This
procedure gives the HaiTiott coffelation which involves reactor design, stiITing
speed, and power input, and is expressed by the agitation intensity, I:
(5-3.4)
u
.,a,
'E
u
.x
ca., density ( P8 ), '-/cm3
u
,._
,._
a,
0
u 001
,._
~-A ! 1
a.,
~=2+06(9W) (~) 2------.
,._
Vl
C -5 2
0,._
D= 10 cm/sec
I- -2
µ= K) Q/Cm5€C
Vl
"'0 P=
I
1.0 Q/cm 3
~
Figure (5-3.1) Plot of mass transfer coefficient vs. particle diameter for free-
falling spheres; minimum mass transfer coefficient, k*
(Wadsworth and Miller, 1979)
122
5-3-3 Kinetics/Mechanism
The cementation reaction is, in principle, very similar to corrosion process and
polarization studies of the individual half-cells therefore yield invaluable
information to explain the mechanistic features of the process. The data from the
cmTent-potential curves can be reprocessed to yield Evans diagrams as shown in
figure (4-5.2). From this the mechanism, the reaction cmTent density and the
reaction rate of the cementation process can be derived from the intersection of
the two curves. In general most cementation reactions are controlled by a
diffusion step although in some cases an electrochemical or a mixed step
controls the reaction kinetics. Under diffusion-control step the rate constant can
be evaluated from equations (4-3.12) and (4-3.13).
The potential difference (~E 0 ) of the two half-cell reactions involved in the
cementation process can also yield mechanistic details. Power and Ritchie
123
(Power and Ritchie, 1976) formalized the mixed potential model using Evans
diagrams and outlined conditions to predict the control mechanism. In most
cases where the cementation process is controlled by mass transfer (diffusion)
step, ~E 0 is generally greater than 360 mV, while for d£ 0 <60 mV the reaction
should be controlled by an electrochemical (electron transfer) step. Mixed
kinetics may be expected for voltages in between, depending upon the
exchange-current density. In reviewing the data of Strickland and Lawson
(Strickland and Lawson, 1971) for 18 systems, 15 had d£ 0 values greater than
360mV.
Power and Ritchie (Power and Ritchie, 1976) have also shown the important
role of the ratio of cathodic to anodic area in the electrochemical analysis of
cementation kinetics. In order for a certain cementation reaction to take place,
the total cathodic current must be equal to the total anodic current in which case,
(5-3.5)
where Ac & Aa are the cathodic and anodic areas respectively and ic & ia are the
cathodic and anodic current densities respectively. However, the cathodic and
anodic areas may differ from one another at the time of reaction initiation and
the fraction of the surface acting cathodically or anodically may change during
the reaction progress. In a cementation process, a tight, coherent surface
(cathodic) deposit may reduce the anodic area (ie., Aa < Ac). For a diffusion-
controlled reaction the total cathodic current is fixed and the effect of having a
decreased anodic area is to necessitate a higher anodic current density with a
subsequent increase in the mixed potential. When the anodic area is greatly
reduced the mixed potential shifts to a more positive position (into the Tafel
region) resulting in the change of the reaction mechanism to a chemically
controlled step. Chemical control results when the mixed potential is raised by
an amount~' given by:
where b is the Tafel slope for the anodic polarization curve, ia' is the anodic
current density (for Ac > Aa) and ic is the cathodic current density (Miller,
1981). Another possibility is that as the anodic area decreases, the limiting
anodic current density is reached before reaching the point of chemical reaction
control. Under these circumstances the anodic metal salt crystallizes at the
124
surface and the anodic cmTent density will be fixed by the concentration
gradient between the saturated solution surrounding the salt at the surface and
the bulk solution. Further decrease in the anodic area and the increase in mixed
potential will result in a transition to chemical reaction rate control. It is
therefore evident that as a cementation reaction proceeds, the cathodic/anodic
area changes and a variation in the mixed potential as a function of time can be
expected. In this regard, measurement of the mixed potential in cementation
reactions can be useful in the determination of the intrinsic reaction kinetics.
dC -kAC
=--- (5-3.7)
dt V
where C is the concentration of the reactant solution (mol/cm 3), V is the volume
of the reactant solution (cm3), A is the surface area of the active metal (cm 2)
and t is the reaction time (sec). For a reactant solution of initial concentration
C0 , the integrated form of equation (5-3.7) is:
(5-3.8)
125
Hence:
log( C/C 0 ) = -kA t (5-3.9)
2.303V
where Cr is the concentration of the reactant solution at time t. Thus, the plot of
log(Cr/C0 ) against t should be a straight line (for a first-order kinetics) from
which slope the rate constant k can be calculated. Hence, measuring the rate of
disappearance of the noble metal is usually a convenient method of following
the reaction kinetics. This commonly involves the periodic withdrawal of
samples from the solution and subsequent analysis for the noble metal by an
appropriate analytical method. In practice, the reactant volume decreases during
the reaction as samples are drawn from it, and a small correction is therefore
necessary to compensate for this change in volume. The form of the corrected
first-order equation, to which most cementation reactions conform
approximately, is:
(5-3.10)
(5-3.11)
v is the sample volume, and ~t is the (constant) time between samples. The
value of Sn is the same for reactions of any order, and the equation assumes a
slightly more complicated form if ~t is not constant.
Beckstead (Miller and Beckstead, 1973) on the basis of variable reduced metal
growth kinetics and its influence on the effective interfacial area.
Invariably, many investigators agree that the kinetics are controlled by rates of
diffusion at the interface and are dependent on sample diameter, solution
viscosity and stirring speed. Schaich and Nicol (Schaich and Nicol, 1978)
measured rates of cementation of copper on iron using a rotating disc of iron
plated on platinum and demonstrated diffusional kinetics based upon the effects
of stirring speed, copper concentration and temperature. For most systems that
have been studied using a rotating disc, a good agreement with the Levich
equation has also been obtained indicating diffusion control. The data of
Schaich and Nicol (Schaich and Nicol, 1978) illustrate the excellent correlation
of measured rates with the expected half-power dependence on (I) (stirring
speed). The measured rate constants for the various systems studied by
Strickland and Lawson (Strickland and Lawson, 1973) also show good
correlation with the rate constants calculated using the Levich equation.
Conformance to the Levich equation has also been demonstrated for
copper/cobalt (Ho, 1973), silver/iron (Episkoposyan and Kakovskii, 1966),
copper/iron and silver/iron in brine (Episkoposyan and Kakovskii, 1965) and
silver/zinc and gold/zinc in cyanide solutions (Shcherbakov and Kakovskii,
1967; Oo and Tran, 1991).
k = Ae-E.IRT (5-3.12)
(5-3.13)
Thus, a plot of In k versus 1/T frequently results in a straight line, with -E/R as
the slope, from which the numerical value of Ea can be determined. In
differential form equation (5-3.13) becomes:
127
dE
d In k=--a dT (5-3.14)
RT 2
If the specific rate constant is known for two temperatures, dEa may be
calculated directly by equation (5-3.15). The apparent activation energy has
frequently been used as evidence for or against chemical control. For a process
controlled by a chemical step Ea exceeds 6 kcal/mol (25 kJ moI- 1), whereas for
reactions controlled by diffusion in a liquid phase, Ea is generally between 2 and
6 kcal/mol. The activation energies of most cementation systems reported in the
literature support a diffusion-controlled model (Wads worth, 1969; Power and
Ritchie, 1975; Miller, 1981). A few systems, however, exhibit rather large
activation energies and have been described as being chemically controlled. The
deposition of palladium onto copper in 0.1 M perchloric acid below 45°C is
described in this way, having an Ea of 40 kJ moI- 1 (Von Hahn and Ingraham,
1966). Similarly, the low temperature reaction of copper ions with nickel metal
is ce1tainly chemically controlled, since it has an Ea of about 270 kJ mol- 1
(MacKinnon et al, 1971 ). A non-diffusional process (ie chemical control) has
also been observed for the cementation of gold by iron from cyanide solution
between 25°C and 84°C (Ea= 50±5 kJ mol- 1) (Kenna et al, 1990). However, Ea
values of diffusion-controlled reactions are somewhat sensitive to hydrodynamic
conditions. In particular, they are generally higher when the flow is turbulent
(Riddiford, 1952). Therefore the apparent activation energies for rotating disc
studies (in a laminar flow regime) are usually lower (3-4 kcal/mol) than the
apparent activation energies for rotating cylinder (turbulent flow) studies (5-6
kcal/mol) (Strickland and Lawson, 1973 ). This is largely borne out in the
apparent activation energies for various cementation reactions limited by mass
transfer in the aqueous phase, as shown in table (5-3.1). On the other hand, high
activation energy may be obtained for a diffusion-controlled reaction if the form
of the deposit is temperature sensitive. Miller and Beckstead (Miller and
Beckstead, 1973) found that for the Cu++ /Fe system, the deposit roughness
increased with temperature between O and 35°C with an activation energy in this
temperature range being 42 kJ mol- 1. Above 35°C, a value of about 17 kJ mol- 1
128
was obtained, which was thought to be the true value for the diffusion process,
the deposit profile being invariant at the higher temperatures.
For an ideal first-order reaction, the rate constant should be independent of the
concentration of reactant in solution. However, in many systems a characteristic
effect of the noble metal ion concentration on cementation reaction kinetics has
been observed. Strickland and Lawson (Strickland and Lawson, 1973) showed
that the kinetics on deposit roughened, rotating disc depends very strongly on
the initial concentration. The same is presumably true for many rotating cylinder
studies which are carried out under turbulent flow conditions. Consequently, the
observed dependence of rate constant on initial concentration of noble metal ion
is related to the structural and mass density of the smface deposit. Alternatively,
the concentration dependence of the mass transfer coefficient can be
rationalized in terms of the concentration dependence of diffusion coefficient
and activity of diffusing species (Miller, 1979).
Common impurities in reactant solutions (eg., Fe 2+) tend to lower the hydrogen
overvoltage on metals resulting in their loss by dissolution. Redissolution is a
problem in the extraction of copper with iron (Nadkarni and Wadsworth, 1968).
The most important impurity in reactant solutions is dissolved oxygen which
must be removed by extensive bubbling of the solution with nitrogen.
130
Anions and surfactants may affect the rate of cementation reaction in several
ways. Complex formation changes the effective concentration of the diffusing
ion, and may also modify the deposit structure (Von Hahn and Ingraham, 1967).
Species that adsorb to the surface can reduce the active surface, affect the
deposit morphology, or react with the surface. Strickland (Strickland, 1972)
showed that the second (enhanced) stage of the copper/zinc reaction has larger
rate constant in chloride than in sulphate solutions, due to changes in the deposit
structure.
The presence of the hydrated proton may also influence the cementation
reaction. A variation of deposition rate with pH has been observed in a number
of cementation systems. In general, this is attributed to a change in the reacting
species with pH. Gladyshev, Enikeev, Zakharchuk and Petrova (Gladyshev et al,
1970) studied the pH dependence of the thallium/zinc amalgam reaction over a
wide range of pH, and found large variations in rate depending upon the stable
zinc species at a given pH. The deposition rate decreased at pH = 9.0, due to the
formation of insoluble Zn(OH)i on the surface, but increased at pH = 11.0 as
[Zn(OH)J]- formed. The rate of the gold/zinc reaction decreased as the pH
increased (above pH: 13.0) at a constant cyanide concentration. Nicol, Schaich,
Balestra and Hegedus (Nicol et al, 1979) and Oo and Tran (Oo and Tran, 1991)
found this to be due to the formation of hydroxide ions in the zinc oxidation
process.
5-4.1 Deposit
5-4.2 Morphology
Invariably, the structure and morphology of the reaction product can have a
significant effect on the reaction kinetics, either enhancing the rate in some
cases or passivating the surface in other cases. During the past several years the
importance of the surface deposit in the interpretation of cementation rate data
has therefore been clearly demonstrated in quantitative manner. The cathodic
part of a cementation reaction is an electrodeposition reaction. Surface deposits
formed in cementations systems are therefore quite similar to electrolytic
deposits and may be influenced by the activity (or concentration) of depositing
ion, temperature, agitation (hydrodynamics), pH, nature of the anions present
(eg., ligand), presence of addition agents (eg., organic colloid), and the
condition of the substrate metal (Drozdov, 1958; Miller, 1981 ). Under special
circumstances the cementation reaction may be inhibited presumably because of
product ion diffusion resistance (Miller, 1981 ). A further complication is
introduced by the fact that simultaneous dissolution of the underlying metal is
taking place.
Agitation (or solution flow) also affects the morphology of the deposit.
Generally, the surface deposit is either dendritic (treelike) or botryoidal
(bulbous) and the reaction kinetics are enhanced significantly due to the
132
presence of the deposit. However, it has been shown in the case of zinc
deposition from cyanide solution that, as the flow rate (and hence the Reynolds
number) of solution over the cathode increases at constant current density, the
nature of the deposit changes from a dendritic, to a botryoidal, to a smooth
deposit (Naybour, 1969). In stagnant or slowly flowing solutions, dendritic
growths have been reported in cementation reactions (Strickland and Lawson,
1970; Barth et al, 1973). In rotating-disc system the deposit has also been shown
to vary with respect to radial position on the disc surface (Calara, 1970). For
laminar flow, at all positions on the disc's surface there is a gradual change from
a coarse deposit at the disc centre to a finer textured deposit at the edge of the
disc. For the case in which the flow changes from laminar to turbulent at some
radial position of the disc, there is an abrupt rather than a gradual change in
surface-deposit character, and the influence of the transition to the turbulent
flow regime on the surface deposit is most pronounced. Fluid flow also
dete1mines at a microscopic level the basic character, namely nucleation, of the
surface deposit.
Consequently, the first-stage reaction kinetics may not be seen as the critical
deposit mass density is reached almost immediately. According to MacKinnon
and Ingraham (MacKinnon and Ingraham, 1970), the structure of the copper
deposited on aluminium at 70°C became coarse and granular at copper
concentrations in excess of 5X 10-3 M, although at intermediate concentrations
the deposit was a coherent film.
In heterogeneous systems, the rates of reaction are often related to both the total
surface and the number of reactive sites per unit area available for reaction
(Wadsworth, 1979). In considering the cementation of metals using suspended
particles, the fluid-particle is three dimensional and the reacting area is
subjected to great change (eg,. shrinks) dming the course of the reaction. It is
therefore possible to treat the kinetics using the shrinking-core model applied to
the leaching of mineral particles. The shrinking-core model visualized the
particle-fluid reaction as occurring primarily at the outer smface of the particle
and the net result is an unreacted shrinking core with a reacted diffusion (or
product) layer surrounding it. Considering monosized spherical particles the
reaction kinetics will therefore be controlled by diffusion at the boundary of
fluid-particle initially, diffusion through the reacted (or product) layer or surface
reaction at the inte1face.
134
where NA is the number of moles, b is the boundary layer and r0 is the radius of
the original particle (sphere). From stoichiometry, the number of moles of
unreacted B with time is:
_ dN 8 I _dV_
___ = -4m· 2 dr (5-5.4)
dt V dt V dt
where V is the molar volume and is equal to M/p, where M is the molecular
weight and p the density and r is the radius of the unreacted B. If ex is the
fraction of B reacted, it may be shown that:
(5-5.5)
da 3r 2 dr
-=--- (5-5.6)
dt r/ dt
(5-5.8)
Equation (5-5.8) indicates that for a film diffusion controlled process, a plot of
a versus t should yield a straight line. The mass transfer coefficient can be
determined from the slope of the plot.
The same calculational procedure as above can be used to determine the rate
equation for a product layer diffusion controlled process. The integrated rate
expression in terms of the fraction of solid reacted is shown by the following
equation:
2
1--a-(l-a) 213
= (2V)
- 2 (b)
- D[A]bulk t (5-5.9)
3 ~ a
where D is the effective diffusivity of species A into product layer. Equation (5-
5.9) will yield a straight line by plotting 1- 2 a -(1- a)213 versus t and the
3
effective diffusivity of species A can be determined from the slope. Another
unique feature for a product layer diffusion controlled reaction is that the
modified rate constant kp (i.e. kp = ( 2 ~) ( b) D[A]bulk) or rate of reaction is
ro a
sensitive to the particle size, ie., the rate decreases with an increase in particle
size.
Similarly, for a kinetic (or surface) reaction controlled process, the rate equation
can be calculated to be shown by the following equation:
where n is the order for reactant A. In this case, a plot of 1-(1- a) 113 versus t
will yield a straight line from which the specific rate constant, k, can be
136
determined from the slope. The rate equation (5-5.10) also indicates that the rate
is inversely proportional to the particle size.
When a fluid-particle reaction does not generate any solid product (eg., aA(f) +
bB(s) ---, cC(t)), the reacting particle shrinks during the reaction and finally
disappears. The reaction can be controlled by either a film diffusion process or a
surface (or kinetic/chemical) reaction. When surface reaction controls, the
behaviour is identical to that of fluid-particle reaction forming a solid product,
ie., equation (5-5.10). The integrated rate expression for a film diffusion process
for a shrinking spherical particle is shown by:
2V b
1-(1- a) 213 = ( -
2 ) (-) km[Ahutk t (5-5.11)
ro a
where km is the mass transfer coefficient. Thus, a plot of 1-(1- a) 213 versus t
will yield a straight line and km can be determined from the slope.
CHAPTER SIX
The following points have been deduced from the literature review:
(1) Cyanide has been a powerful lixiviant in extracting gold from a wide range
of ores at a relatively low cost, especially when used in the carbon-in-pulp (CIP)
process and in the heap leaching process.
(3) Cyanide and its complexes are very toxic and present health and
environmental problems with cyanidation. Growing public paranoia imposes
severe government regulations on the use of cyanide in most places. Care must
be exercised to maintain cyanide solutions alkaline in order to prevent the
release of hydrogen cyanide gas and spent cyanide liquors must be degraded
before being discharged to the environment. Also gold dissolution rates with
alkaline cyanide solutions are generally low with contact times of about 24 to 72
hours.
(5) The halides in particular form both Au(I) and Au(ill) stable complexes
with gold and dissolution rates are typically several orders of magnitude faster
than those of cyanide/air and other lixiviants under ambient conditions. Among
these, the bromine-bromide system claims other natural advantages of
simplicity, easily controlled leach chemistry, high extraction efficiency,
adaptability to a wide range of pH values, and low toxicity. In addition, bromine
can easily be regenerated electrochemically from solution with the potential for
simultaneous recovery of gold.
(2) Determine the factors controlling the zinc cementation process with the
aim to optimise the conditions for gold recovery.
(3) Determine the kinetics (reaction rates) of the gold reduction and the zinc
oxidation.
(4) Determine the mechanism of the reaction and the factors controlling the
rate determining steps.
(5) Identify the predominant species m the reaction to reveal the vanous
equilibria governing the recovery process.
CHAPTER SEVEN
THERMODYNAMIC STUDY
7-1 INTRODUCTION
equilibrium compositions in the system with thermodynamic data taken from the
literature (Pourbaix, 1966; Tyurin, 1966; Naumov et al, 1974; Wagman et al,
1982). All possible compounds which are known to exist in the system and for
which thermodynamic data could be found were considered.
7-2-1-1 Chemix
The program allows a set of possible chemical species and phases present in a
chemical system to be easily defined using standard chemical nomenclature. The
initial state of the system may also be defined in terms of selected elements or
species and their amounts. The basic thermodynamic data for the set of species
are retrieved from the data bank or entered directly. For non-ideal solution
phases, the activity coefficients of the component species must then be defined
as functions of temperature and composition. A number of well-known methods,
including the extended Debye-Huckel and Pitzer methods, are provided for this
purpose.
143
The program calculates the particular species and phases and their quantities
which give the minimum total Gibbs energy for system at given temperature and
pressure by the Eriksson minimization method (Eriksson, 1975). In this method,
the quantity:
G go
-RT = I,n-[(-)-+ln
I RT I
a-]I (7-2.1)
Following this, enthalpy balances between initial and equilibrium states, the
distributions of the elements among the equilibrium products and the
thermodynamic properties of the total system may be calculated. To explore the
effects of system variables, there are further options for various repetitive or
step-wise calculations. There are also options to fix, maximize or mm1m1ze
chosen properties of the system by systematically varying others.
- SYSTEM defines all the possible phases and component species which may be
present in the system at equilibrium. The three reserved phasenames are GAS,
AQUEOUS and SINGLE.
- GIBBS enters Gibbs free energy for component species defined by the system.
- FILE searches data files for thermodynamic data sets. The first three
characters, CPD, identify the file type in use as thermodynamic data for
144
species and the second group of three characters define the source of the data
in the file.
- TRY enters trial equilibrium moles of species. This directive allows the setting
of estimates of the equilibrium moles of all possible species in the system. It
provides a starting point for the iterative calculation of equilibrium.
7-2-1-2 System
The program system provides for the automatic calculation and plotting of
equilibrium stability and associations of chemical species in defined chemical
system to be compactly represented on various predominance area diagrams,
such as Pourbaix, Ellingham or partial pressure diagrams (Turnbull, I 977;
Turnbull and Wadsley, 1984 ).
The program allows the system for the diagram to be defined by entering the set
of species to be involved in the axes, areas and overlay lines. Chemical reactions
145
involving all valid combinations of these species are then set up and balanced
automatically. The basic thermodynamic data for the species are retrieved from
the data bank or are entered directly and the Gibbs energy changes of the
reactions calculated, including the effects of set activities and molar volumes.
The computed diagram, with axes scaled, marked and labelled and areas
identified, may then be plotted on single or multi-pen plotters. A typical system
input is as shown in appendix (7-2.2). The directives for the program:
- DIAGRAM enters the species used in diagram under axes, ligands, areas and
lines specifying the state and charge (for charged species).
- GIBBS enters coefficients for Gibbs free energy data for species.
1 Data Entry: Data input can be created by any editor or word processor
which supports ASCII files. Two blocks of information define a valid input:
and
- N enters name of the output file to store the stability diagram in.
Under these conditions, the equilibria governing the Br--Br2-H2O system are
notably dependent on the bromide concentration and pH. Bromine is most stable
in acidic conditions and higher bromide concentrations. However, at 0.10 M Br-
concentration and above, the tribromide ion, Bq- emerges as the dominant
species as a result of the reaction of Br- with Br2 according to equation (2-1.17).
The initial concentration of bromide is thus reduced by this reaction. In effect,
the stability window of the Br2/Br- equilibrium is governed judiciary under such
conditions by the relative predominance of Br3- in the system.
In the neutral pH range, HBrO (aq) is the predominant species while above pH
of 9.00, Bro- is the predominant species. This indicates that in general Br2
disproportionates into the soluble oxy-bromo species in the neutral and basic
conditions causing the Br2/Br- equilibrium to destabilise. The positions of the
HBrO (aq)/Br- and BrO-/Br- equilibria shift to higher pH values as bromide
concentration increases. At 0.10 M Be HBrO (aq) ceases as the predominant
species in the neutral pH range, thus extending the BriBr- stability window
over pH's 1.00 to 9.00.
149
At low pH and especially low Br- concentration, it can be inferred that, bromine
undergoes less disproportionation and its high activity will influence or
jeopardise any system operating under such conditions. It can also lead to
potential corrosion (oxidation) problems.
-+- Br3-
-¼- BrO-
-8
-a- HBrO (AQ)
-*- Br03-
-+ Br5-
-12
-16
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
-+- Br3-
~ BrO-
--a- HBrO (AQ)
-8
-x- Br03-
~ Br5-
-14
-20 '---*-----,~_._*-'*-~!---'H-~f---H-----'-----a,...___'--____..::::al--'
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
-+- Br3-
-4 ~ BrO-
--a- HBrO (AQ)
-x- Br03-
-8
~ Br5-
-12
-16
-20 L--'k---------;j(__J_~,j(_~'-----'lll==--'--#--H-----A'---'fl---..::W--------'
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
-5 ""*- BrO-
-a- HBrO (AQ)
""*- Br03-
-+-- Br5-
-10
-15
-20 L---¾-~,--*-""*"----';*-*-~~E-...J.._-Bi!l---l!l-..:::::aa-flf-----J
0 1 2 3 4- 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
The stability of the various zinc complex ions influences the reactions of the
zinc ions in solution. A knowledge of the stability of the zinc complexes is
therefore vital in the control of the solution chemistry of zinc cementation
reactions.
Eh
2.0 r-------.-----,-----,--------.--..-----,---~~~
A Zn
B Zn E-2(AQ)
1.5
C Zn(OH)2(AQ)
D Zn(O H) 4E2 (AQ)
1.0 C
1 - - - - -
0.5 B
0.0 D
- - - -2.
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5 A
p[Zn++)[Br]
0 .-----+----+---+---+-----ll- --+---+----+---+---+-----ll- ----1----1--~
I Zn++
1 ZnOII+
3 Zn (Oil) 2 (AQ)
2 4 ZnO112 (S)
5 ZnBr+
3
6 ZnBr2 (AQ)
4 7 ZnBr3-
8 Br-
5 9 IIBr (AQ)
pll2O:0/0/0
6
pH: o IOI .2
7 pZn++: O I .25 I o
3 Br: O / .25 I 0
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Figure (7-3.3) The solubility diagram for the Zn-Br-H 2 O system at 25°C
[Zn] = [Br-] = 1.0 M (constructed using the DIASTAB
program).
7c..!-BR--r-i20
T· 298. 15
--+- - - +--- - - -+--- - +--
', 00 ... +- +- ---- --3 t- - ~ '. .'.r~--.-_,.
----------=-------- 1 2 :~:--~QH-"
3 :~N {OH) 2 (..:.G
90 l .i. 4 zr·JBR-+-
5 Zt-!8n2 (t~O}
, 5 ::NBR3--
GO
l 7 a.=.--
.! B YBR (,:.Q)
. oH20 Q. 0
l;:,H· 0/ .2
\ , o2'.-i· 2/0
60 1 1 oaR· 010
:,O i I
4C 'El
I
-~ \
5 / \
------ \2',
% Zn ions
90
Zn l+
80
70 ZnBr 3
60
50
40
30
20
10
ZnBr +
o L--1=====1::===:c:===:::::i::==--=±::::::::::::==-===r::::::::::__----1..__ ____1:::::::::;~
-3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
log(Br-]
Figure (7-3.5) The distribution - log [Br·] diagram for the Zn-Br-H 2 O
system at 25°C [Zn] = SX 10-5 M and [Br] = 10-3 M to 30.0
Mand pH= 3.50 (constructed using the CHEMIX program).
Concentration (M)
0.012 , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
ZnBr3-
--+ ZnBr+
--e-- Zn++
0.008
-*- Zno (s)
~ Zn02--
0.006 -A- 02 (AQ)
---H-- Br2 (AQ)
0.004-
0.002
0 1 2 3 4- 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Concentration {M)
0.012 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
ZnBr3-
0.010 X
-+- ZnBr2 (AQ)
--+ ZnBr+
--e-- Zn++
-*- zno (s)
~ Zn02--
---H-- Br2 (AQ)
0 1 2 3 4- 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
The distribution between the species, Zn 2+, ZnBr+, ZnBr2 (aq) and ZnBq- in
this pH range is also dependent on the concentration of zinc. The Zn-bromo
complexes are more predominant at higher concentrations of zinc. Similarly, the
soluble species, ZnOi2- (or Zn(OH)4 2-) is more predominant in alkali conditions
(pH> 10.0) at higher concentrations of zinc. However, ZnOi2- is only stable in
solutions of low zinc concentrations (ie., < 1o-4 M) above pH: 12.60. Also, the
Br2 (aq) equilibrium concentration can be seen to be greatly reduced in the
presence of excess zinc addition. The oxidizing properties of the Br2 (aq)/Br
equilibria are therefore highly impaired at zinc concentrations greater than 0.01
M, and contributes in part to the lower stability of the soluble species under
such conditions.
-8
-9
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
-8
-9
-10'--~~9------'--~9---'e>---l!I---H--Bi&--l!P---E----IF=---!IHIIIII---'
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
-6
-8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
-4
-*- ZnO {S)
~ Zn02--
--¾- Br2 {AQ)
-6
-8
0 2 4 6 B 10 12 14
pH
-B
-10 L--------'---------l----19-ilFlllll--&I_____ _J
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
log [Br-]
Figure (7-3.Sa) The distribution - log [Br] diagram for the Au-Br-H 20
system at 25°C, [Au] = 1000 mg/I, [Br2] = 0.1875 M, [Br·] =
10-3 M to 10.0 M and pH = 2.00 (constructed using the
CHEMIX program).
-4-
-5 '------B----l-----111---1. . . . . . . . . ._ _ _ _ _ __J
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
log(Br-]
Figure (7-3.Sb) The distribution - log [Br·] diagram for the Au-Br-H20
system at 25°C, [Au] = 1000 mg/I, [Br2] = 1.875X 10- 3 M, [Br·
] = 10-3 M to 10.0 M and pH = 2.00 (constructed using the
CHEMIX program).
160
p[Au(m)][Br-]
0
1 Au+++
2 Au (OIi) 3
3 Au (OH) 4-
1
4 Au (OH) 5--
5 Au (OU) 6---
2 6 Au (OIi) 3 (S)
10 7 Br-
8 HBr
3 9 llAuBr4
10 AuBr4-
6 pll20: 0 / 0 / 0
4 pH: o / o / .l
pAu(lll): .507 I .25 I 0
pBr-: 0 / .25 I 0
5
3
2
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
pH
Figure (7-3.9) The solubility diagram for the Au-Br-H 2O system at 25°C
(constructed using the DIASTAB program).
160
161
Thus, the reaction path for the dissolution of gold in bromide solution yields
predominantly AuBq- complex. AuBr2- is unstable in aqueous bromide solution
and tends to disproportionate into AuBq- and Au(0) according to the
equilibrium reaction (2-4.10).
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
pH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14- 15
pH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
pH
The stability of Au(ill) bromide at different concentrations (10 and 100 mg/I)
with respect to changes in solution conditions (pH, [Br-]) are also shown in
figures (7-3.lla-c) and (7-3.12a-c). In figures (7-3.lla-c), the stability of 10
mg/I Au(ill) bromide solution can be seen to be strongly dependent on the
solution pH and the free bromide in the solution.
Concentration (lE-6 M)
60~---------------------,
02 (AQ)
50
-+- Br2 (AQ)
-¾- AuBr-4.-
-e- AuBr2-
4-0
--*- Au
~ HAu03--
30 -A- H2Au03-
-¾- Au03---
20
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Concentration (1E-5 M)
!Or-----------------------,
02 (AQ)
-+- Br2 (AQ)
8 -¾- AuBr4-
-e- AuBr2-
6
-*- Au
-+- HAu03--
-A- H2Au03-
4 --H- Au03---
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Concentration ( 1E-6 M)
60~-----------------------,
02 (AQ)
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
At 104 M free Br and Br2 (aq) concentration of 6.07X 10-5 M (figure (7-
3.lla)), AuBq- (10 mg/1) complex is only stable below pH 2.00. At pH> 2.00,
Au (s) precipitates. At a higher concentration of free Br- (1.0 M), AuBq- is
more stable over a wider pH range (pH: 1.00-6.00) as shown in figure (7-3. llc).
Also, at [Br-J = 0.10 M, [Br2 (aq)] = 6.07X 10-5 M and pH > 4.00 (figure (7-
3.1 lb)), AuBq- decomposes to AuBr2- (on the basis of mass balance) where the
latter predominates in the solution between pH:5.00 and 6.00 and Au (s) forms
above pH:6.00. At higher Br concentrations (ie., [Br] > 0.10 M), AuBr2-
becomes more stable in the neutral pH range, and Au (s) can only be formed at a
higher pH as shown in figure (7-3.1 lc).
Similarly, as shown in figures (7-3. l 2a-c ), for a 100 mg/I Au(III) bromide
solution, the stability of AuBq- is enhanced as free Br concentration in the
solution increases from 10-4 M to 1.0 M ([Br2 (aq)] = 6.07X 10-4 M). However,
AuBr2- is only dominant in the Au(III) bromide solution of 1.00 M free Br-
concentration within a small pH range of 6.20 to 7 .00 and will predominate over
wider pH range at much higher Br- concentration.
Concentration ( 1E-5M)
60.-------------------------,
02 (AQ)
10
o L_.,.....t:::::11&::::a~-----~--------1--------:111~
o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7a 9 10 11 12 13 14-
pH
Concentration (1E-5M)
60~---------------------
02 (AQ)
20
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Concentration (E-4 M)
6.....-------------------~
- Br2 (AQ)
5
-+- AuEr4.-
""* AuEr2-
-e- HAu03--
-*- H2Au03-
-4- Au03---
3 ---A- Au
--*- 02 (AQ)
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
In the presence of 10-4 M Zinc, only 02 (aq) Br2 (aq) and Br3- equilibrium
concentrations decreased in the pH regions where they are stable, comparing
figures (7-3.13a) and 7-3.12b). The equilibrium concentration of AuBq- is
specifically not affected by this zinc addition in the gold-bromide solution. At
higher zinc concentration of 10-3 M, as shown in figure (7-3.13b), AuBq-
decomposes into Au and AuBr2- (by mass balance) below pH:5.00 and
predominantly Au between pH:5.00 and pH:7.00. Br2 (aq)/Br3- and 02 (aq) are
completely reduced in this pH range. Above pH:7 .00, the equilibrium
concentrations of the species Au and ZnO (s) are of the same equilibrium values
as those of Au and ZnO (s) for the thermodynamic conditions shown in figures
(7-3.12b) and (7-3.7b) respectively.
168
Concentration ( lE-4-M)
6,--------------------------~
02 (AQ)
o L-__.--,__-1..:~----------.1...ji~HilllF::::::.lat-•--1-••~
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Concentration (1E-4M)
12.------------------------,
02 (AQ)
10 -+- AuBr4-
~ AuBr2-
-a- Zn++
8
~ Au
--+- ZnO (S)
6 -A- Br2 (AQ)
-H- Br3-
4
0 1 2 3 4- 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Concentration ( 1E-4M)
25r-------------------~
AuBr2-
--t- Zn++
20 ~ Au
-a- ZnO (S)
15
-*- 02 (AQ)
~ Br2 (AQ)
-A- Br3-
10 -H-- AuBr4-
00 '------.l!l-----------l-------'----1----~--------.--------__J
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
However, for the zinc condition of 2.3x 10-4 M (figure (7-3.13c), it can be seen
that, in addition to Br2 (aq)/Br3·, 02 (aq), AuBq· and AuBr2· are completely
reduced to Au over the pH range of 1.00-7 .00 where they are stable in the
Au(III) bromide solution for the stated conditions, in comparison with figure (7-
3.l 2b ). Similarly, as shown in figures (7-3. l 4a-b ), 10 mg/litre Au(III) bromide
in a solution of 0.10 M Br-, 6.07X 10-5 M Br2 (aq), is also completely reduced
to Au in the presence of zinc amount of 2.3x 10-4 M.
These results show that, the reduction of the Au(III) bromide, AuBq·, to Au(0)
by zinc (ie., zinc cementation of Au from bromine-bromide solution) will be
more cost effective at pH's 5.00-7.00 and high gold concentrations. Below
pH:5.00, reduction of Au(III) bromide can only be effective at zinc amounts
more than the stoichiometric requirements. This simulation also indicates that
between pH's 1.0-4.0 and especially at high zinc amounts, zinc will be
conoded/oxidized (ie., reacts with hydrogen ions) first, before it reacts with
Au(III) bromide, Br2 (aq)/Br3· and 02 (aq).
170
Concentration (1E-4M)
1.2 , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
02 (AQ)
0.2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Concentration (1E-5M)
25~---------------------~
AuBr2-
-+- Zn++
20 -¼- Au
-a- Zn0 (S)
-x-- 02 (AQ)
15
--4--- Br2 (AQ)
-A- AuBr4-
10 -¾f.- Br3-
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
At low zinc additions and low gold inventories, as the results also indicate, the
reduction of AuBr4- yields AuBr2-/Au(0). This means that, the reduction of
AuBq- to Au(0) involves the AuBr4-/AuBr2- and AuBr2-/Au(0) steps. As
depicted by figures (7-3.12a-c), this observation will be more pronounced at
higher Br- concentrations.
CHAPTER EIGHT
ELECTROCHEMICAL STUDY
8-1 INTRODUCTION
The anodic and cathodic reactions involved in the zinc cementation of gold from
gold-bromide solutions/liquors were studied separately as half-cell reactions by
electrochemical technique.
(2) the effects of bromide concentration, pH, temperature and other solution
conditions on the current-potential relationships of the reaction with the
aim of optimising the best conditions for recovery.
8-2 EXPERIMENTAL
I_
--:J
'
k.,,~-J
.
Digitized data were also acquired with a 386-PC using Quick.log PC Data
Acquisition package through a TLC 548/9 LinCMOS 8-bit Analog-to-Digital
Converter, placed in parallel with the YEW 3086 X-Y recorder, as shown in
figure (8-2.2).
Figure (8-2.2) Front view of data acquisition unit showing: 386-PC and
TLC 548/9 Analog-to-Digital Converter.
The TLC 548/9 provides low error conversion of ±0.5 least significant bit
(LSB) in less than 17 microseconds.
The Quicklog PC software offers data logging and monitoring to disk in a text
format that is compatible with spreadsheets, data bases, and other analysis
programs. Multiple channels may be logged into one file including optional time
and date sampling. Multiple files may log data simultaneously.
8-2-3 Electrodes
All experiments were carried out using spectrographically high purity gold and
zinc rotating-disc electrodes with surface areas of 0.385 cm 2 and 0.0314 cm 2
respectively and fitted in teflon sleeves/shroud that could be rotated at various
speeds. Figure (8-2.3) shows these electrodes.
Prior to use, these electrodes (WE) were cleaned, polished with fine gram
(12µm) alumina powder and washed thoroughly with distilled water.
176
Figure (8-2.3) Gold (left) and Zinc (right) rotating-ruse electrodes for
electrochemical half-cell studies.
8-2---1- Apparatus/Othe rs
The electrochemical cell consisted of 125 ml round bottom pyrex glass cell
(Pine Instrument model # PRF696 l 6--1-) with ports/compartme nt s for elec trodes,
thermometer and gas dispersion.
The cell was imme rsed in a water hath (dimensions: 8x 8x 10 cm) with a
thermostat to control the tempe rature to t0. 5°C. /\n Orion model S/\ 520 pi I
meter was used to meas ure the pi I or the so lutio ns.
177
All solutions were prepared from analytical grade chemical reagents and
distilled water.
A synthetic gold bromide stock solution (1000 mg Aull) was prepared from lg
of 99.99 % gold foil dissolved in 10 g/1 NaBr solution containing 10 ml of liquid
bromine and stined for about 12 to 24 hours. The solution was stripped off
excess bromine by bubbling air through for about 2 to 3 hours (ie., until bromine
vapour ceased to evolve).
The total bromine (BrtotaI) in the stock solution was estimated against a 0.25 %
sodium thiosulphate (Na2S2O3) in the presence of 50% H2SO4 and 10% Kl
with combined platinum/saturated calomel electrode. The amount of bromine
was calculated according to the equation:
EPl x 1.265
Brtotal (g /1) = - - - - (8-2.1)
z
where Z is the volume (ml) of sample aliquot and EPl is the volume (ml) of
0.25% Na2S2O3 solution at equivalence point.
The bromide ions in the stock solution was also estimated against 0.03 M
AgNO3 solution with silver/KNO3 electrode. The bromide concentration was
calculated according to:
where Z is the volume (ml) of sample aliquot and EPl is the volume (ml) of
0.03 M AgNO3 solution at equivalence point.
The scanning voltammetry technique was used to study both the anodic
dissolution/oxidation of zinc in sodium bromide solutions and the cathodic
179
The zinc and gold working electrodes were used for their respective half-cell
study. The working electrode was securely mounted on the metal shaft of the
electrode rotator and was submerged approximately 5 mm below the surface of
the solution in the cell to foster a well controlled rotating-disc electrode
hydrodynamics.
At the start of each experimental run, 120 ml of the test solution was adjusted to
the required pH (2.00-7 .50) by the addition of sulphuric acid or sodium
hydroxide and was allowed to obtain the required temperature in the water bath.
The solution was de-oxygenated (where necessary) with high purity (oxygen-
free) nitrogen for 30 minutes and then maintained under that atmosphere for the
duration of the experimental measurement.
For each experiment, the RDE 4 Potentiostat was set to the required potential
range, scan rate and cunent conversion factor and the X and Y axes of the X-Y
recorder adjusted to the appropriate sensitivities. Cunent-potential curves were
recorded using a 386-PC using Quick.log PC Data Acquisition package through a
TCL 548/9 LinCMOS 8-bit Analog-to Digital converter. All potential scans
were started at the conesponding rest potential.
For the anodic studies, the test solutions were sodium bromide solutions with no
bromine. It was difficult maintaining the same concentrations of bromine as the
res idual bro mine in the solutions for the cathodic studies in the sodium bromide
solutio ns for these studies.
181
The anodic experimental measurements were carried out in the potential range
of -1.20 V to -0.50 V (vs SCE), at a scan rate of 20 mV/s and electrode rotation
speed from 200 to 2500 rpm. The electrodes were polished between scans to
minimize variation in electrode area before each testing.
The test solutions were gold bromide solutions of the required concentrations of
Au (ID) bromide ions in the respective concentrations of NaBr solution (free Br-
ians of the same concentrations as in the equivalent anodic study) and residual
bromine (present from the stock solution).
The cathodic studies were carried out in the potential range of -1.80 to +0.80 V
(vs SCE) at a scan rate of 20 mv/s and electrode rotation speed between 200 and
2000rpm.
Current {mA)
1.2 , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.0
0.8
0.2
RDE area = 0.0314 aq.cm.
0.0 L----'-------'-"""""--.L_----L--____IL-_ _...J___ ___J
-1.5 -1.3 -1.1 -0.9 -0.7 -0.5 -0.3 -0.1
E vs SCE {V)
Current (mA)
5.0 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
pH= 5.00 1 0.01 M NaBr
3.0
2.0
3
1.0
o.o L_--1---=;;;;;;;;;~;;:;;;;~===.::ic=:::=::::1::==~==---__L__ _J
-1.2 -1.1 -1.0 -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4
E vs SCE {V)
It is also apparent from figure (8-3.2) that the anodic dissolution of zinc will not
occur at an appreciable rate in low bromide solutions (ie., < 0.01 M). At high
bromide concentrations ( > 0.10 M) there will be accelerated corrosion
(oxidation) of zinc.
Figure (8-3.3) also shows the current-potential curves for the anodic dissolution
of zinc in 0.05 M bromide solution at various pH's, at 20°C and 1000 rpm.
Increasing the pH value at constant Br- concentration resulted in a cathodic shift
of the anodic curves. This indicates the influence of H+ ions in the rate-
determining step. At pH values less than 5.00, the participation of H+ ions leads
to high zinc corrosion as depicted by the observed high current values. At a pH
value of 2.00, increasing the pH value at constant B{ concentration resulted in a
significant cathodic shift of the anodic dissolution curves. This is due to the
participation of hydrogen ions in the rate-determining step of the dissolution
reaction. Much lower currents are obtained at pH values between 5.00 and 7.00.
Current (mA)
1.0 , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
1 pH= 2.00 4 pH= 6.00
0.2
o.o L _ ~~:::::___--1.._ _
______J........ __.L__ __L__ __L__ _J
-1.2 -1.1 -1.0 -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5
E VS SCE (V)
Current (mA)
o.o~--~--~--~--~---~-~
1 100 rpm 8 1000 rp., e 1000 rpm
1 eoo rpm 4 1100 rpm e HOO rpm
B A
C
-0.2
2
8 pH• 8.00
-0.4 4 Temp.• 10 C
e
e
[AuBr-4-) • 100 mg/I
-o.e [NaBr[ • 0.01 M
-o.a~--~--~--~--~---~-~
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Eva SCE (V)
It is apparent that the first cmrent rise (region A) in figure (8-3.4) (at potentials
cathodic to 0.60 V) results from the reduction of bromine (or aquo-bromide
species) to bromide ions according to:
185
-0.2
-0.4
pH • 15.00
-o.e a -02; -Br2(aq); -Au
Temp.• 10 C
for which the reduction potential can be expressed by the Nernst equation as:
E O RT _ RT
(B _) = E(B _) - -ln[Br ]+-ln[Bri(aq)] (8-3.2)
r r F 2F
The second wave (region B) at about -0.25 V corresponds to the reduction of the
gold (Ill) bromide ions to metallic gold (ie., Au (0)) according to:
(8-3.4)
(8-3.5)
The current increases with decreasing potential until it becomes limited (limiting
current) at potentials cathodic to about -0.70 V (vs SCE). The third current rise
(region C) at -1.30 V also results from the evolution of hydrogen from the
reduction of H2O1H+ according to:
(8-3.6)
or
(8-3.7)
Furthermore, figure (8-3.6) shows the variation between the magnitude of the
limiting current densities and the square root of the rotational speeds of the disc
for the reduction of gold(ill) under the conditions in figure (8-3.4). The square-
root dependence of the limiting current densities follows the Levich's equation
(equation (4-3.5)), which describes the rate of mass-transport to a rotating disc
under laminar conditions. Thus, the cmTent-potential curves show a clear mass-
transp011 controlled (independent of potential) zone at potentials lower than -
0.70 V (vs SCE).
Figure (8-3.7) shows the typical current-potential scans at 1000 rpm for the
reduction of 100 mg/1 Au(III) bromide ions in 0.05 M NaBr solution (containing
90 mg/1 Br 2 (aq)), 20°C and various pH's from 3.00 to 7 .00.
187
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
o.o-----~~----~-----~-----~
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
sq. root of rotation (rad/sec)-1/2
Current (mA)
0.0 , - - - - - - - - , - - - - , - - - - - - - , - - - . - - - - - - r : 7 " " - - - - ,
l pH • 7.00 8 pH • Ii.DO Ii pB • 8.00
2 pH =Cl.00 4 pH =4.00
-0.6
[AuBr<i-] = 100 111&/l
[NaBr] = O.OCi M
a _ __
-0.9
Temp.= 293 K
RPM.= 1000
-1.2 RDE area = 0.385 aq.cm
-1.5 ~ - - - - ' - - - - ~ - - ~ - - - ~ - - ~ ~ - - ~
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
E VB SCE (V)
It can be seen that at pH's 4.00, and 3.00, the third steady-state current wave
(region C) in figure (8-3.4) at -1.30 V (vs SCE) is shifted negatively.
Figures (8-3.8a-c) also show the difference in E/1 profiles between the
background electrolyte (ie., 0.05 M NaBr) and those obtained in 100 mg/I
Au(ill) bromide solution containing 0.05 M NaBr at pH's 5.00, 4.00 and 3.00
respectively. In the potential range -0.25 V and -1.30 V (vs SCE), where the
reaction is believed to be limited by the mass-transport of Au(ill) bromide ions
to the electrode surface, the scans at pH 4.00 and 3.00 yield an additional
current rise. This effect is particularly more significant at much lower pH's
leading to higher limiting currents as pH decreases. Another feature of the
cathodic polarisation curves is that they demonstrate rather a progressive anodic
shift in the potential at which the additional current rise commences as pH
decreases.
pH• 15.00
[NaBrl • 0.015 M
Temp.• 293 K
-1.2 RPM.• 1000
-1.4
ROE area • 0.3815 aq.om
-1.8
-1.8 L . . __ _ _ ___.___ _ _ ____,____ _ _ _____.___ _ _ __ _ .
pH• 4.00
(NaBrl • 0.015 M
Temp.• 283 K
RPM.• 1000
-1.4
ADE area • 0.388 1q.cm
-1.e
-1.8 .____ _ _ _ _ _ _ L_ _ _ _ __ _ , _ __ _ _ _ __ . __ _ _ __ _ _ ,
E vs SCE (V)
o.o~---------------------~
-0.2 --e-- [AuBr4-I • 0 mg/I
-A- (AuBr4-) • 100 mg/I
-0.4
-o.e
pH• 3.00
-0.8
-1.0 (NaBrl • O.OCI M
-1.2 Temp.• 293 K
RPM.• 1000
-1.4
-1.e ROE area • 0.385 1q.cm
-1.8
-2.0 '------------'---------'-------_.__ _ _ _ ~
The change in the shapes of the polarisation curves for gold(ill) bromide
reduction at pH's 4.00, 3.00, is likely to be due to the preferential reduction of
H+ ions/protons on the surface of the electrode at these conditions and which
becomes more pronounced as pH decreases (ie., H+ increases as pH decreases).
This is in close agreement with the mechanism of the reduction of H+ to give
hydrogen atoms proposed by Rieger (Rieger, 1987) given in section (4-4.1 ).
The reduction of H+ ion may be catalysed on the surface of the gold electrode,
thereby lowering the reduction over-potential for the H+ ions on the gold surface
much further.
1 pH• 3.00
-0.05
2 pH• 4.00
-0.10 3 pH • 11.00
2
-0.15
Temp.• 293 K
-0.20 RPM.• 1000
-0.25
ADE area • 0.386 sq.cm
-o.so
-0.35 L . __ _
.1....__ _..1--_ _ _.__ _ __.___ _ _~ - - ~
The reduction of the Au(ill) bromide ions from bromine-bromide solutions and
the zinc dissolution in bromide solutions were further evaluated in terms of
Evans diagrams constructed from the current-potential curves (polarisation
curves) of the two half-cell reactions. Figure (8-4.1) shows a typical Evans
diagram constructed for a 100 mg/1 Au(ID) bromide ions/Zinc dissolution in
0.05 M NaBr solution at pH:5.00, 20°C and 1000 rpm. The polarisation curves
for the two half-cell reactions are also represented in a similar diagram as shown
in figure (8-4.2).
It can be seen from figure (8-4.1) that, the intersection of the anodic and
cathodic polarisation curves lie in the diffusion-control region of the cathodic
branch. Figures (8-4.1) and (8-4.2) reveal a large potential separation (L1E 0 >
0.36 V) of the equilibrium lines for gold(ill) bromide reduction and zinc
dissolution and the existence of a unique mixed (or corrosion) potential (-1.00
V) at which the rate of the anodic reaction is equal but opposite to that of the
cathodic reaction. These establish that under this condition, the Au(ill)
bromide/Zinc cementation reaction is mass-transport diffusion controlled and
there will be no thermodynamic restriction to the completion of the reaction.
Inefficient deposition of gold onto zinc cannot be attributed to the lack of
driving force. Consequently, the rate at which Au(III) bromide ions are reduced
in the displacement reaction is determined by the rate at which Au(III) ions
diffuse onto the zinc surface, provided the anodic and cathodic reactions
proceed independently on the zinc surface.
It is also clear from figure (8-4.1) that excess zinc has to be used to react with
the residual bromine and dissolved oxygen besides the Au(III) bromide ion
reduction reaction. At about -1.00 V (vs SCE) (ie., the mixed potential), the
COITesponding current density (0.935 mA/cm 2) involved in the reduction
process, is equal to the sum of the various current densities for the reduction of
the residual bromine (or aquo-bromide) species (A), gold(IIl) bromide ions (B)
and dissolved oxygen (C). In effect the reaction kinetics is strongly dependent
on the gold concentration, bromide concentration, bromine concentration, pH,
dissolved oxygen and temperature of the solution. The inter-related effect
between these factors as found from the study is discussed.
192
E vs SCE (V)
1.0
[AuBr4-I • 100 mg/I
Aelluollon
0.5 [NaBrl • 0.06 M
pH• 6.00
0.0
Temp.• 293 K
RPM.• 1000
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
log current density (mA/sq.cm)
Figure (8-4.1) Evans diagram for the reduction of 100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide
ions/Zinc dissolution in 0.05 M NaBr solution at 20°C,
pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm. A: reduction of bromine species; B:
reduction of Au(III) bromide ions; C: reduction of dissolved
oxygen.
pH• 6.00
2.0 Temp.• 293 K
O.Ol-------''-----'--+e=•'-----'------'-------''-: :,,------;
t,•• - - - - -·
-1.0
Aelluctlon
-2.0 ' - - - - ~ - - - ~ - - - ~ - - - ~ - - - ~ - - ~
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Eva SCE (V)
The reduction of residual bromine as can be seen in figure (8-4.1) precedes the
reduction of the Au(ill) bromide species and is mass-transport controlled under
almost all conditions. In the bromide system depending on the bromide
concentration and the pH value, the bromine species predominant are Br 2 (aq),
Br3- (which forms as a direct reaction between Br2 and Br-), Bro- and HBrO
(aq).
Primarily, Br2 (aq) (or aquo-bromide) species reduction increases the Br-
concentration in the solution. Increasing Br2 (aq) (or aquo-bromide species)
concentration will undoubtedly aggravate its behaviour in the system. This will
lead to a shift in the mixed potential, change the rate step controlling the
reduction of Au(ill) bromide ions and jeopardise the gross efficiency of the
cementation reaction. In particular, its inherent oxidizing properties will
increase the dissolution of zinc in the bromide solution, causing an anodic shift
of the polarisation curve. This will result in a decrease in the magnitude of the
driving force necessary for the cementation reaction.
-1.6
Figure (8-4.3) Evans diagram for the reduction of 100 mg/I Au(l11) bromide
ions/Zinc dissolution in 0.01 M NaBr solution in (a) presence
of o 2 , (b) absence of 0 2 ; at 20°C, pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm.
195
The presence of dissolved oxygen also consumes zinc and causes a significant
shift in the reaction kinetics. Figure (8-4.3) shows the Evans diagram for the
reduction of 100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide ions and zinc dissolution in 0.01 M NaBr
solution in the presence of oxygen and without oxygen (purged with nitrogen for
30 minutes) at 20°C, pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm. The presence of oxygen caused the
anodic curve to shift to a more anodic direction and can be seen to change the
kinetics from a diffusion-control mechanism to a charge-transfer step. This will
lead to a less efficient cementation and the reaction might cease.
Figure (8-4.4) shows the Evans diagram for 100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide/zinc
dissolution in different bromide solutions, pH:5.00, 20°C and 1000 rpm. It can
be seen that both the Au(ill) bromide ions reduction and zinc dissolution half-
cell reactions shifted in the cathodic direction as bromide increased from 0.01 M
to 0.10 M. However at 0.50 M bromide concentration the Au(III) bromide
reduction curve moved relatively in the anodic direction.
-1.6
-2.0
-1.5 -1.0 -0.6 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
log current denalty (mA/aq.cm)
Figure (8-4.4) Evans diagram for the reduction of 100 mg/I Au(lll)
bromide/Zinc dissolution (oxidation) in (a) 0.01 M Nallr (b)
0.05 M NaBr (c) 0.10 M NaBr (d) 0.50 M Nallr; at 20°C,
pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm.
196
In addition, the respective potential for the evolution of hydrogen (due to the
reduction of water) shifted to less negative values as bromide concentrated
increased from 0.01 M to 0.50 M. The mixed potentials (where the anodic and
cathodic curves intersect) for 0.01 M NaBr, 0.05 M NaBr, 0.10 M NaBr, and
0.50 M NaBr are -0.98 V, -1.00 V, -1.07 V, -1.01 V (vs SCE) respectively and
the corresponding current densities are 0.89, 0.93, 1.05, 0.83 mA/cm2
respectively. As shown in figure (8-4.4 ), diffusion-control kinetics are
demonstrated by these concentrations of bromide solutions. It can be seen that
the effect due to the changes in bromide concentration (0.01-0.50 M) is only
marginal. However, at 0.50 M NaBr, a relatively lower current density (ie., rate
of reduction) is observed. Also, the intersections of the anodic and cathodic
curves at 0.10 M NaBr and 0.50 M NaBr are just at/closer to the respective
potentials for evolution of hydrogen. These imply that, at high NaBr
concentration(> 0.10 M) Au(ill) bromide ions will be reduced at a decreasing
rate, and accelerated corrosion of zinc. The decreasing rate of reaction at high
bromide concentration is probably caused by a decrease in the diffusivity of
Au(ill) bromide ions as NaBr solution becomes more concentrated, leading to a
shift in potential in the cathodic curve. This effect can be expected to be more
pronounced at lower gold concentrations.
On the other hand, the anodic behaviour of the zmc dissolution curve with
decreasing bromide concentration shows that, at lower NaBr concentration (ie.,
<0.0lM), the polarisation curves will intersect in the Tafel region of the Au(III)
bromide reduction branch and the reaction will proceed under an
electrochemical or charge transfer control step. Any changes in the reaction
(such as influence of bromine) under such conditions may lead to the complete
cessation of the reaction.
It is therefore obvious that the addition of free bromide solution (0.01 M to 0.10
M) during zinc cementation of gold from bromide leach liquors is essential.
Certainly, from the points of intersection of the polarisation curves in figure (8-
4.4 ), it follows that, best kinetics are obtainable at 0.01 M NaBr. However, for
practical applications, the concentration of bromide in this range (0.01 M to
0.10 M) can be rationalised in terms of thermodynamics to be dependent on the
bromide concentration necessary to stabilize the Au(III) bromide ions in
solution. Higher concentrations of bromide are required for more concentrated
Au(III) bromide solutions to be stable.
197
8-4-4 Effect of pH
Figures (8-4.5) and (8-4.6a-d) also show the Evans diagrams for the cathodic
reduction of 100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide ions and the anodic dissolution of zinc in
0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, 1000 rpm and different pH values (2.00 to 5.00).
Also, as shown in figures (8-4.6b-d), the addition of 100 mg/I Au (III) bromide
ions in 0.10 M bromide solutions at pH's 4.00, 3.00 and 2.00 has no noticeable
effect on the cathodic polarisation curves for a blank 0.10 M NaBr solution.
-1.5
Figure (8-4.5) Evans diagram for the reduction of 100 mg/I Au(Ill)
bromide/Zinc dissolution in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, 1000 rpm
and (a) pH 2.00 (b) pH:3.00 (c) pH:4.00 (d) pH:5.00.
198
(NaBrl • 0.10 M
pH• 6.00
-1.0
Tamp.• 2g3 K
RPM.• 1000
-1.6
Figure (8-4.6a) Evans diagram for the reduction of (a) 0 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide (b) 100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide; and Zinc dissolution
in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:5.00, 1000 rpm.
[NaBrl • 0.1 M
pH• 4.00
-1.0
Temp.• 293 K
RPM.• 1000
-1.5
Figure (8-4.6b) Evans diagram for the reduction of (a) 0 mg/I Au(l11)
bromide (b) 100 mg/I Au(III) bromide; and Zinc dissolution
in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:4.00, 1000 rpm.
199
(NaBrl • 0.1 M
pH• 3.00
-1.0 Temp.• 293 K
RPM.• 1000
-1.5
Figure (8-4.6c) Evans diagram for the reduction of (a) 0 mg/I Au(l11)
bromide (b) 100 mg/I Au(ID) bromide; and Zinc dissolution
in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:3.00, 1000 rpm.
(NaBrl • 0.1 M
pH• 2.00
-1.0 Temp.• 293 K
RPM.• 1000
-1.5
Figure (8-4.6d) Evans diagram for the reduction of (a) 0 mg/I Au(III)
bromide (b) 100 mg/I Au(Ill) bromide; and Zinc dissolution
in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:2.00, 1000 rpm.
200
These results are strong indication that the mechanistic features of the cathodic
reduction of Au(ill) bromide ions at low pH's (< 4.00) are compatible with the
existence and the cathodic nature of protons (H+) on the surface of the gold
smface. Thus, at low pH's the rate of reduction of Au(ill) bromide ion is
controlled by the reduction of hydrogen ions.
Figure (8-4.7) also shows the Evans diagram for the reduction of Au(ID)
bromide ions/zinc dissolution in 0.05 M NaBr at 20°C, 1000 rpm and pH values
of 5.00, 6.00 and 7.00.
-1.5
-2.0
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
log current denalty (mA/aq.cm)
Figure (8-4. 7) Evans diagram for the reduction of 100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide
ions/Zinc dissolution in 0.05 M NaBr at 20°C, 1000 rpm and
(a) pH:5.00 (b) pH:6.00 (c) pH:7.00.
(NaBr) • 0.10 M
0.0
pH• 6.00
-0.5 Tamp.• 2g3
RPM.• 1000
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0~-~-~-~-~-~-~~-~-~-~---'
-2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
log currant danalty (mA/aq.cm)
Figure (8-4.8) Evans diagram for the reduction of (a) 10 mg/I Au(III)
bromide ions (b) 100 mg/I Au(ID) bromide ions and Zinc
dissolution in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:5.00, and 1000 rpm.
It can also be seen m figure (8-4.8) that the potential for the discharge of
hydrogen on gold due to the reduction of water shifts anodically at 10 mg/I Au
concentration. This results in the cathodic branch intersecting the zinc
dissolution curve in the hydrogen evolution region. Consequently, zinc will be
dissolving not only as a result of its reaction with Au(III) bromide ions, but also
as a result of its reaction with protons which are discharging on the smface of
the gold deposited during the displacement reaction. Thus, at low gold
concentration and under these conditions, the reaction would be inhibited by the
simultaneous hydrogen evolution.
203
8-5 RA TE MEASUREMENTS/KINETICS
Under ideal conditions, the rate of reduction of Au(ID) bromide ion by metallic
zinc is controlled by diffusion of the aurobromide ion to the zinc surface. In
essence, the rate constant can be predicted from the reduction half-cell reaction
via the Levich's equation (equation (4-3.5)).
8-5-1 Diffusivity
The variation of limiting current densities for gold reduction (obtained at a gold
RDE in a solution containing 100 mg/I Au, 0.05 M NaBr, 90 mg/I Br2 (aq), at
20°C) with square root of rotational speed at pH's 5.00, 6.00, 7.00 is shown in
figure (8-5.1).
At each pH, the linear relationship of limiting current density versus square root
of rotational speed, yields a slope from which the diffusion coefficient of
Au(ID) bromide species was calculated using the Levich's equation (refer to
appendix (8-5.1)). The kinematic viscosity value of 0.01002 cm 2/s for 0.05 M
NaBr (Weast, 1974) was used for the calculations.
__._ pH = 5.00
0.06
0.04.-
0.02
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
sq.root of rotation (rad/sec)-0.5
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
Figure (8-5.2) shows the plot of the diffusion coefficient values with pH. As
shown, the diffusion coefficient decreases significantly with pH in the pH range
5.00 to 7 .00. Thus, the diffusion coefficient of Au(III) bromide is represented
reasonably by 0.17x 1o-6 cm 2/s at 20°c, pH:5.00.
The resulted diffusion coefficient values were used to predict the reaction rate
constant, kp, at the respective pH using equation (4-3.13). This yielded a
representative kp value of 4.2X 10-4 emfs for the reduction of Au(III) bromide
ions in 0.05 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm.
CEMENTATION STUDIES
9-1 INTRODUCTION
The reaction rate was measured by following both the rate of disappearance of
gold and the rate of appearance/dissolution of zinc. The rate of cementation was
then compared with the predicted rate (from electrochemical studies) under the
same experimental conditions.
9-2 EXPERIMENTAL
9-2-1 Materials
The chemical reagents as described in section (8-2-1) were also used for these
studies.
2()(,
Figure (9-2. 1) Rotatin g disc system for the A u(l ll) bromide/Zinc
cementation experiment (zinc rotating-d isc geometry); from
left to right: zinc disc; brass rod; teflon/plexiglass holder.
9-2-1 -2 Zinc
High purity (99.9%) zinc rotating zinc discs of area 7.069 cm 2 (diameter J.0 cm
by 2 mm thick) as shown in figure (9-2. 1) were used as wo rking
electrode/precipitant in the rotating-d isc geometry. The zinc disc s were
mach ined from cast zinc.
Also. of same purity (ie .. 99_9c1c ) zinc dust/particles or size ranges +38 ---1-:i pm:
+45-63 pm: +63- 106 µ m and surface areas 0.0906 m 2/g; 0.0547 111 2/g; 0.03--1-0
m2/g respectivel y were used in the suspended particles experiments.
Figures (9-2.2) and t_9-2.3) show the sc hemati c diagr::ims or the experimental
apparatus used for the zinc rotating-disc geometry and the suspe nded 1111 (
p::irticles experiments respectivel y.
207
5
1 Zinc disc
2 Reference electrode
3 Thermometer
4 Rotating shaft
5 Motor
4 6 DC/Speed controller
7 Multimeter
8 Water bath
2 9 Reactor/Cell
10 pH Meter
11 pH electrode
12 Thermostat
3
As shown in figure (9-2.2) the apparatus for the rotating-disc study consisted
essentially of a rotating-disc assembly, rotator/rotating shaft, a motor, a speed
controller, a reactor vessel, a water bath and a multimeter. The rotating-disc
assembly consisted of the zinc disc screwed into a brass rod and placed in a
bell-shaped teflon/plexiglass holder (shown in figure (9-2.1) mounted on a
stainless-steel shaft which could be rotated at various speeds. The rotating shaft
was in turn coupled to a DC motor and the speed was controlled by a DC
supplier. Similarly, the experimental apparatus for the suspended zinc particles
study, consisted of a stirrer, a combined stirrer motor and speed controller, a
reactor vessel, a water bath and a multimeter. The stirrer was a 30 cm long
PVC/Teflon rod with a 2-blade polyethylene impeller (dimensions: 2 cm x 4
cm).
In these studies, the rotating speed of the rotating shaft/stirrer was measured and
monitored by a TM-2011 Optical tachometer (RS Components Ltd). A high
impedance multimeter, model P7080B (Parameters Pty Ltd) with a maximum
sensitivity of 0.10 mV was used to measure the mixed potential of the test
solution during the course of the experiment. An Orion model SA 520 pH meter
was used to monitor the pH of the solution.
208
5
1 Stirrer impelers
2 Reference electrode
3 Thermometer
4 Stirrer rod
5 Motor/Speed controller
4
6 Pt electrode
7 Multimeter
12 8 Water bath
2 9 Reactor/Cell
10 pH Meter
11 pH electrode
12 Thermostat
7
All the batch experiments were canied out in a I-litre glass reactor vessel
(diameter: 10 cm , height: 15 .5 cm ) supported in a constant temperature water
bath controlled with a thermostat (of range: 0 - 100°C) and a constant speed
impeller. The lid of the reactor was a PVC stub (10-cm diameter and 2-cm
thick) with baffles/ports for the zinc electrode assembly/stiner, thermometer,
electrodes, nitrogen-dispersion tube (gas ingress) and sampling.
The chemical analyses of the solution samples from the different cementation
experiments for gold and zinc concentrations were carried out with a Varian
(Spectra A20) atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Bromine and bromide
contents were also determined by potentiometric titration using the Automatic
titrator unit shown in figure (8-2.4) following the procedure described in
sections (8-2-5-1-1) and (8-2-5-1-2).
the secondary electron emission mode. Prior to this study, each specimen was
coated with approximately 200 A (angstrom unit) of Au (in the case of the zinc
particles) and C (in the case of the zinc discs) in a JEOL vacuum coating unit
operated at a residual pressure of about 3X 10-5 Torr. Further examination of the
chemical nature of deposit on the zinc discs (beyond the limitations of the SEM)
was done using a PHILIPS X-ray diffractometer installed on PW 1140 X-ray
generator. The gold deposited on the zinc particles were also further examined,
in a cold setting resin polished to 1 µm, under a ZEISS optical microscope.
9-2-3 Preparations
A synthetic gold bromide stock solution (1000 mg/1) was prepared following the
same procedure and analysis as described previously in section (8-2-5-1) for
electrochemical study. The reaction mixtures (or test solutions) of gold bromide
containing the required concentrations of Au(III) ions and Br- ions were
prepared by dilution of the stock solution using the desired amount of acidified
NaBr solution.
Prior to use, the zinc disc surface was initially roughly ground on 300, 600,
through 1200 grit wet emery papers followed by polishing with 4000 grit wet
emery paper to mirror appearance on a BUEHLER G1inder Ecomet V polisher.
The disc smface was then thoroughly washed with tap water rinsed with
distilled water and immediately dried with pressurised air. The prepared discs
were used immediately as soon as possible after cleaning to prevent
contamination.
Zinc dust/particles (-75 µm) was separated into the various size fractions (-45
+38 µm; -63 +45 µm; -106 +63 µm) by dry sieve analysis using Endecotts
210
laboratory test sieves (38, 45, 63, 106 µm) arranged m a stack or nest and
shaken on an Endecotts EVS I shaker for 30 minutes.
The surface areas of the different size fractions of zmc particles were
determined by a multipoint BET method at 77 K with nitrogen as the analysis
gas. The BET smface area reports and plots of the different size fractions are
shown in appendix (9-2.1).
The batch reactor cementation experiments were can-ied out with an initial
reaction mixture/test solution of volume of 500 ml. Prior to any measurement,
the reactor vessel and the reaction mixture/test solution were allowed to attain
thermal equilibiium (at the required temperature) in the water bath. The test
solution/reaction mixture was adjusted to the desired pH (with H2S04/NaOH)
and de-oxygenated with high-purity (oxygen-free) nitrogen for 45 minutes. The
reactor was subsequently operated throughout the experiment with a continuous
purge of oxygen-free nitrogen over the surface of the solution.
In all experiments, solution samples of 5.0 ml were withdrawn from the reactor
vessel at regular intervals (using a 5 ml pipette) for gold and zinc analyses and
where required bromine/bromide contents. The mixed potential and pH of the
solution were also measured/monitored at each sampling time.
These experiments were performed in the system shown in figure (9-2.1). The
principal and reference electrodes for the potential measurements were the zinc
rotating-disc and saturated calomel electrode respectively.
The zinc rotating-disc assembly was lowered into the Au(III) bromide solution-
filled reactor vessel and rotated at a desired rotational speed (measured by an
optical tachometer) to commence the cementation reaction. After two hours of
211
experimental run, the rotating-disc assembly was dismounted and the zinc disc
was detached from the teflon/plexiglass holder, washed with distilled water and
then dried in a vacuum desiccator prior to morphological study.
The reaction product after 30 minutes run, in this case, was filtered, washed
with distilled water and dried in a vacuum desiccator for 24 hours.
Figure (9-3.1) shows the various behaviour of the first-order plots for 10 mg/1
AuBq-/Zn cementation in 0.10 M NaBr solution (containing 9.8 mg/1 Br2 (aq))
at 20°c, pH: 5.00 and stiITing speeds of 200, 500, 1000, 1500 rpm.
212
-0.1
[Ne.Br] = 0.1 M
pH= 5.00
-0.2
Temp. = 20 C
-0.3
Stlrri eed
-0.4 RPM= 200 Initial solution vol. = 600 ml.
-+- RPM= 500 RDE. area = 7.069 aq. cm
-0.5 -A- RPM = 1000
-a- RPM= 1500
-0.6 ~ - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - ~ - - - '
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time, (mins)
8.0
-+- Enhanced rate, kc(2)
8.0
[AuBr-'-] = 10 q/L
6.0 (NaBr] = 0.10 M 6.0
pH= 6.00
Temp.= 20 C
4.0 4.0
0.0 ~ - - ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - ~ 0.0
0 3 6 9 12 15
w-1\2 ((rad/s)-1/2)
Figure (9-3.2) Variation of reaction rate constants with the square root of
rotation speed for 10 mg/I Au(Ill) bromide/Zn cementation
in 0.10 M NaBr solution (containing 9.8 mg/I Br2 (aq)); at
20°C and pH:5.00.
213
The rate constants, kc(l), calculated for the initial period (0 to 20 minutes) and
kc(2) for the enhanced period (20 to 120 minutes) (from the geometric slope of
the first-order plots) are plotted in figure (9-3.2) for the various stirring speeds.
As shown, the initial rate curve followed the Levich's equation (equation (4-
3.13)) based on hydrodynamic theory for laminar flow conditions, which, for
diffusional processes predicts that the rate will increase with square-root of the
rotation/stirring speed. The kc(l) values for rotational speeds of 200 and 1000
rpm are in reasonable agreement with the kp values (as shown in table (9-3 .1)
for the same conditions calculated from polarization measurements. Also, the
enhanced rates kc(2) are in strong dependence on the rotational speed and in
general confirms a mass transfer limited/controlled process for the Au(III)
bromide/Zn cementation reaction under these conditions.
The enhancement of the reaction rate constant at higher rotation speeds can also
be attributed to the changes in properties of the reacting surface with rotation
speed resulting in changes in deposit morphology.
The results are presented in log( concentration ratio) against time plots in figure
(9-3.3). These plots also show that the Au(III) bromide/Zn cementation reaction
follows a two-stage first-order kinetics.
214
-0.1
[Naik] = 0.1 M
pH= 5.00
-0.2
RPM. = 1000
-0.3
-0.4 10 C
-+- 20 C Initial aolution vol. = 500 ml.
-0.5 -A- 30 C RDE. area= 7.069 sq. cm
-a- 40 C
-0.6
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time, (mins)
Figure (9-3.3) Variation of log (concentration ratio) with time for 10 mg/I
Au(ill) bromide/Zn cementation in 0.10 M NaBr solution
(containing 9.8 mg.I Br2 (aq)); at pH:5.00; 1000 rpm and (i)
10°c (ii) 20°c (iii) 30°C (iv) 40°C.
ln kc(l) or kc(2)
-2 [AuBr4-] = 10 mg/1
--
-+-
Initial rate
Enhanced rate
[NaBr] = 0.10 M
pH= 5.00
-4- RPM. =
1000
-
-6 I-
-
-8 ~
I
-10
3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8
1000/T ( 1/K)
It can also be seen that the rate of reaction improves with increasing temperature
from 10°C to 40°C and the enhanced rate occurs sooner at higher temperatures.
The differences in the dual kinetic regimes at high and low temperatures can be
explained on the basis of variable reduced metal growth kinetics and its
influence on the effective interfacial area. The plots of the natural logarithm of
the initial rate/enhanced rate against the inverse of temperature (Arrhenius plots)
are shown in figure (9-3.4). The slopes of these plots yield activation energies of
2.50 kcal/mol (10.50 kJ/mol) for the initial rate period and 3.13 kcal/mol (13.12
kJ/mol) for the enhanced rate period, confirming that the Au(ill) bromide/Zn
reaction is controlled by a diffusion mechanism as predicted by the Evans
diagrams (section 8-4).
The observed dependence of rate constant (especially with the enhanced rate
period) on the initial gold concentration is quite attributable to marked physical
changes in the deposit structure due to differences in the nucleation and form of
the crystal growth. At higher concentrations of initial gold, the deposits are
coarser and more porous as the deposition occurs on dendrites causing a greater
disturbance in the diffusion flux at a constant disc rotation speed.
216
[NaBr] = 0.1 M
pH= 5.00
Temp.= 20 C
RPM. = 1000
-1.0
lniUal [AuBr4-]
10 ppm AuBr4-
-1.5 -1- 20 ppm AuBr4-
-A- ISO ppm AuBr4- Initial aolution vol. = 500 ml.
-a- 100 ppm AuBr4- RDE. area = 7.069 aq. cm.
-2.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time, (mins)
Figure (9-3.5) Variation of log (concentration ratio) with time for (i) 10
mg/I (ii) 20 mg/I (iii) 50 mg/I (iv) 100 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zn cementation in 0.10 M NaBr solution at 20°C,
pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm.
4 20
The role of free bromide in the Au(ill) bromide/Zn cementation reaction was
also studied at different sodium bromide concentrations for two different initial
gold concentrations. Figures (9-3.7 a-b) present the first-order plots for (a) 10
mg/I Au(III) bromide/Zn reaction in (i) 0.001 M; (ii) 0.010 M; (iii) 0.050 M; (iv)
0.100 M; (v) 0.500 M NaBr solution (each containing 9.8 mg/I Br2 (aq)) and (b)
100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide/Zn reaction in (i) 0.010 M; (ii) 0.050 M (iii) 0.100 M
(iv) 0.500 M NaBr (each containing 98 mg/I Br2 (aq)) respectively at 20°C,
pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm. Figures (9-3.8) and (9-3.9) also show the variation in the
reaction rate constants for (a) 10 mg/I Au(ill) bromide/Zn (b) 100 mg/I Au(ill)
bromide/Zn respectively.
It can be seen under the different initial gold concentrations that well-behaved
first-order kinetics were observed for free bromide concentrations between
0.010 Mand 0.500 M. However, at low concentrations of bromide as shown in
figures (9-3.7a) and (9-3.8), while the initial rate constant is highest at 0.001 M
Br-, an inhibiting effect on the reaction rate is observed at 0.001 M NaBr after
80 minutes of cementation leading to a deviation from first-order kinetics. This
phenomenon is attributed to the build-up of gold on the zinc surface increasing
the diffusion path length thereby restricting the diffusion to take place within the
open pores of the deposit. Thus, under these conditions, the gold cementation
will be associated with the dissolution of zinc under conditions which the rate is
controlled by the diffusion of free bromide to the zinc surface. In effect, while
the initial rate decreased with increase in free bromide from 0.001 M to 0.500
M, the enhanced rate slightly increased with free bromide from 0.001 M to
0.100 Mand decreased at 0.500 M.
On the other hand, for 100 mg/I Au(III) bromide/Zn cementation reaction, as
shown in figures (9-3. 7b) and (9-3. 9), the initial rate of cementation increased
with increase in free bromide from 0.01 M to 0.10 Mand decreased at 0.50 M
as predicted by the Evans diagrams in figure (8-4.4) obtained from polarization
measurements. These initial rate constants (kc(l)) agree well in most cases with
the predicted rate constants (kp) as measured from the cunent-potential data
following Levich's equation under these conditions as shown in table (9-3 .1 ).
218
0.00lU NaBr
-t- 0.010 U NaBr
-0.3 -A- 0.050 U NaBr Initial •olulion vol. = 500 ml.
-6- 0.100 U NaBr RDE area= 7.069 sq.cm
--*- 0.500 U NaBr
-0.4~-~--~-~--~--~-~--~-~-~
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time, (mins)
pH= 5.00
Temp.= 20 C
RPM. = 1000
-1.0
Initial [NaBr]
0.0lM NaBr
-1.5 -t- 0.05M NaBr
-A- 0.10M NaBr
Initial aolulion vol. = 500 ml.
-a- 0.50M NaBr RDE. area = 7.069 sq. cm.
-2.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time, (mins)
Figure (9-3.7b) Variation of log([Au] 1/[Au] 0 ) with time for 100 mg/I Au(III)
bromide/Zn cementation in (i) 0.01 M (ii) 0.05 M (iii) 0.10 M
(iv) 0.50 M NaBr ([Br2 (aq)]: 98 mg/I); 20°C; pH:5.00; 1000
rpm.
219
8.0
--+- Enhanced rate, kc(2)
8.0
pH= 5.00
Temp. 20 C
4.0 4.0
2.0 2 •0
lnJUal aoluUon vol. = 500 ml.
RDE area = 7.069 1q. cm
0.0 .___ ___.__ __.__ _---'-_ _.....___ _..___ ____._ ___,__ __, 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
[NaBr], Mole/litre
8.0
--+- Enhanced rate, kc(2) 50.0
pH= 5.00
Temp. 20 C
40.0
RPM.= 1000
6.0
30.0
4.0
20.0
2.0
IniUal aolution vol. = 500 ml. 10.0
RDE area = 7 .069 aq. cm
0.0 .___ ___.__ __.__ _---'-_ _ ~ _ _.___ ___.__ ____,__ __, 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
(NaBr], Mole/litre
Figure (9-3.9) Variation of reaction rate constants for 100 mg/I Au(III)
bromide/Zn cementation with NaBr concentration ([Br2
(aq)]: 98 mg/I) at 20°C; pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm.
220
The enhanced rates in this case, however, decreased as free bromide increased
from 0.01 M to 0.50 M. This behaviour is probably caused by a decrease in the
diffusion coefficients (or mean activity coefficients) of gold-bromide ions due to
increase in the stability (or ionic strength) of the Au(ID) bromide solution as
bromide concentration increases. Nevertheless, the change in structural
characteristics of the deposit during the course of the reaction, over this
concentration range may be in the right direction to explain this variation in
enhanced rates.
The variation in initial rates with bromide concentration for 100 mg/1 Au(III)
can also be attributed to the influence of morphological changes with NaBr
concentration on the kinetics of Au(III) bromide/Zn cementation. Invariably, the
addition of free bromide ( > 0.01 M) is essential in the Au(III) bromide/Zn
cementation circuit and may be said to activate or influence the initial
dissolution of zinc substrate. However, at 0.50 M, as indicated by both
thermodynamics and electrochemical studies, there is an increased corrosion of
zinc.
Figure (9-3.10) presents first-order plots of rate data obtained for various pH
values (2.00-7 .00) for 10 mg/1 Au(III) bromide/Zn cementation reaction in 0.10
M NaBr solution (containing 9.8 mg/1 Br2 (aq)) at 20°C and 1000 rpm. The
influence of pH on the specific rate constants kcO ); kc(2) and zinc dissolution
rate is also presented in figure (9-3.11).
(AuBr4-) = 10 mr/L
-0.1
[NllBr) = 0.1 M
Temp.= 20 C
-0.2
RPM. = 1000
Initial pH
Figure (9-3.10) Variation of log (concentration ratio) with time for 10 mg/I
Au(III) bromide/Zn cementation in 0.10 M NaBr solution
([Br2 (aq)]: 9.8 mg/I at 20°C, 1000 rpm and (i) pH:2.00 (ii)
pH:3.00 (iii) pH:4.00 (iv) pH:5.00 (v) pH:7.00.
222
60 10
Q
4-0
Initial solution vol. = 500 ml. 5
20 D RDE area = 7.0611 aq. cm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
pH
It can be seen from figure (9-3 .11 ), that the initial rates of cementation increased
slightly with decrease in pH from 7 .00 to 4.00 and then increased sharply for
further decrease in pH from 4.00 to 2.00. Clearly, hydrogen ion concentration is
of significance in the kinetics of Au(III) bromide/Zn cementation. The variation
in reaction rates between pH's 2.00 and 4.00 is probably connected with a
change in the nature and morphology of the deposit which may conceivably be
influenced by increased corrosion of the zinc substrate as H+ increased
according to:
Zn + 2H+ = Zn 2+ + H2 (9-3.1)
The effect would be to increase the number of anodic and active cathodic sites
for deposition thereby increasing the rate of nucleation and growth of the
deposit. Based on the information given by AAS measurements of zinc
concentration, the rates of zinc dissolution in the solution are determined in
figure (9-3.11) and table (9-3.2). At lower pH's (2.00 - 3.00), zinc dissolved in
the solution by several times the stoichiometric value. Also, as shown in table
(9-3.2), there was an appreciable change in the initial pH value at the end of
223
each experiment under this study which suggests the precipitation of hydrogen
during the reaction via equation (9-3.1).
Table (9-3.2) The influence of pH on the kinetics of Au(ID) bromide/Zinc
cementation.(initial Au(ill): 10 mg/L; 0.10 M NaBr
(containing 9.8 mg/L Br2 (aq)); 20°C, 1000 rpm).
2 hours of cementation
It could be inferred from these results that, although faster kinetics are
obtainable at low pH values (ie., pH:2.00 - 4.00), the corresponding high zinc
dissolution rates do not warrant a cost effective practical cementation process
under these conditions.
As depicted by table (9-3-3), the zinc dissolution factors were higher at low
initial gold concentration (10 mg/1), low pH values (< pH:4.00) and higher
bromide concentration (0.500 M). At initial gold concentrations greater than 20
mg/1, dissolution factors close to 1.00 were obtained. The relatively higher
dissolution factor at low initial gold concentration (10 mg/1) is due to an
increased effect of H+ reduction in the solution. Thus, under this condition, zinc
dissolves along the reaction path of hydrogen evolution. It can also be seen that,
the dissolution factors increased greatly at low pH values, due to an increase in
the rate of hydrogen evolution. The dissolution factors also increased marginally
with increasing temperature as expected of a diffusion controlled reaction.
Figure (9-3.12) also shows the variation in the zinc dissolution rates with time
for (i) 10 mg/1 Au(l11) (ii) 20 mg/1 Au(III) (iii) 50 mg/1 Au(III) and (iv) 100 mg/1
Au(III) in 0.10 M NaBr solution at 20°C, pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm. These results
show that zinc dissolution rates in general increased with increase in initial gold
concentration. This phenomenon suppo11s the variation in kinetic behaviour
225
(increasing reaction rates) with increase in initial gold concentration and further
suggests that the deposited metallic gold on the zinc smface enhances the
dissolution of the substrate.
Figure (9-3.12) Zinc dissolution rate versus time for (i) 10 mg/I (ii) 20 mg/I
(iii)S0 mg/I (iv) 100 mg/I Au(ID) bromide solution containing
0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm.
226
The effect of the gold deposit on the rate of the cementation reaction is quite
significant. Further examination of the cementation reaction product by
scanning electron microscopes showed that the gold deposit layer on the zinc
surface accounts for the observed boundary layer diffusion-controlled first-order
reaction kinetics. The structure of the surface deposit was found to be
characteristic of a two-stage growth phenomena as evident in many other
cementation reactions. An initial smooth deposit (corresponding to the initial
period/stage of reaction) over which a secondary coarser
particulate/botryoidal/dendritic deposit (corresponding to the enhanced
period/stage of reaction) formed. Once the amount of gold deposited was
massive enough (specific mass deposit) to cause disturbances in the diffusional
process, the secondary particulate/dendritic formation occurred which enhanced
the cementation rate by several times that of the initial period. The change in
smface character is vividly illustrated by comparison of the SEM
photomicrographs under different conditions.
The effect of disc rotational speed on the cementation deposit structure and
morphology is shown in figures (9-3.13a-d) corresponding to 200, 500, 1000
228
Figure (9-3.13a) shows that the gold deposit obtained at 200 rpm consisted of
scattered thin crystallites on entirely smooth matrix/surface. The nature of this
deposit possibly created minimum turbulence in the boundary layer due to its
regular surface and smaller cathodic area and contributed to the lower reaction
rate constants associated with it. This deposit also revealed the initial smooth
deposit corresponding to the initial period of reaction.
An increase in the rotational speed from 200 to 500 rpm resulted in a change in
the nature of the deposit to a thicker growth, with the deposit growing outwards
from the disc (figure (9-3.13b)). The deposit also provided a more roughened
surface area and cathodic sites to facilitate further deposition as observed in
higher reaction rate than at 200 rpm. As the rotational speed was further
increased the deposit changed to a botryoidal structure at 1000 rpm and a
botryoidal-type of fine textured dendiitic growth at 1500 rpm. The physical
nature of these deposits at 1000 and 1500 rpm's contributed to increasing
turbulence in the boundary layer as well as higher surface areas which resulted
in progressively higher reaction rate.
The structural changes of the gold deposits on zinc discs at (a) 10°C (b) 20°C
(c) 30°C (d) 40°C for 10 mg/I Au(ill) bromide/Zn cementation in 0.10 M NaBr
solution (containing 9.8 mg/I Br2 (aq)) at pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm are shown in
figures (9-3.14a-d) respectively.
9-3-3-3 Effect of pH
The scanning electron micrographs at initial pH values of (a) 2.00 (b) 3.00 (c)
4.00 (d) 7.00 for 10 mg/I Au(III) bromide/Zn cementation reaction in 0.10 M
NaBr (containing 9.8 mg/I Br2 (aq)) at 20°C and 1000 rpm are presented in
figures (9-3.15a-d).
Figure (9-3.15a), however, shows that the deposit formed at pH:2.00 appeared
to lack the characteristic fine textured dendritic secondary structure common at
pH:3.00 and pH:4.00 and it is possible that this could have contributed to a pore
diffusion process which limits cementation rates. The enhanced cementation rate
at pH:2.00 (kc(l) = 67.72X 10-4 emfs) was lower than at pH:3.00 (kc(2) =
72.69X 10-4 cm/s).
234
Figures (9-3.16a-d) also show the scanning electron micrographs for (a) 10 mg/1
(b) 20 mg/1 (c) 50 mg/1 (d) 100 mg/1 Au(III) bromide/Zn cementation reactions
respectively in 0.10 M NaBr solution at 20°C, 1000 rpm and pH:5.00.
These show that increasing the initial gold concentration from 10 to 100 mg/1
significantly changed the nature and morphology of the deposit from
particulate/thin botryoidal type of deposit to a coarser and more porous bulbous
growth and then to the formation of dendrites, contributing both surface
roughness and higher surface area towards increasing rates of reaction.
At 20 mg/1 Au(III) shown in figure (9-3 .16b ), the small botryoidal type of
structure seen in figure (9-3.16a) for 10 mg/1 Au(lll) became coarser and more
porous supporting a higher rate of reaction than at 10 mg/1. At higher Au(III)
concentrations (ie., 50 and 100 mg/I) shown in figures (9-3.16c-d), an initial
bulbous deposition was followed by a good growth of long bulbous-type of
dendritic deposits which invariably enhanced further the diffusional process. At
100 mg/I Au(lll) (figure (9-3.16d), these dendritic structures became more
prominent contributing a much higher rate of cementation than at 50 mg/1
Au(III).
237
. ~,.
.-.;,:\:.
... . . w/.
-~ •
.
-.. >!°" . . n·
. : , _ -~
.
~
. ;,
. ~
-
~
•
, . ..
..,. . .
-
.4 - . .
• -
. .
---- •
.~
't(· ... ..._.. .• ·
·.
·- -
)
' . ·C,·
.-~ ·.,- :-_
-....
-~Iii.
~
·
-""
• ;.
r,·
.:
. .1
. . _
.,_
" "'
.·_. .;\;-.'; .•
, : 9 .
•
,;.
~
~ -. ~ ... ,. .~. ,
·-
~
~ . • • ·
._ ,· -i·
f.... . ' . . _. . .·. :.-:. ...
~- •
,
-A
r~·A°'·. -~- -:"~
..a-..;;,.
• '"7 6. ._ .
.
:- . .
{
;
t • -~
'
-
.
I .; --,. . -. .,~- -_,.-.,.. .
'
..
'.
.
-
.
.
·.
-
T '
.. .
. -' - .~ , . ~ .
•
- •·r-
• .•
~')_-,~,
•
~
~
_- . •-,
•°"
•
~~. - i,;.•
. . .,·• , --··' ,.
'
., . .
~
.-.
#-
.-. ~. ,..
4• ...
. C,
,ii
•
.,. •
i. :-< ..4_ -
"'L;..
':-.°"
'
. ·..
..... • ·r-
.f
~
...
,I
....'·
) . ··.
, ""~-- ... -
•
;.
• -
";.
-
""!
' • _., • •
~A.. , - ·
.
-~
.,,
,..
.tJ:
- ·a.
•
.
-...
•
! ,
. -
. . .,.
I '
_.... ;
• • '
- · ...· •
-
~ • -
..•
:··~ ~~\.
, •._, . : d__,. .. ·•. • -
4
••..... I..•· •
_;
..
•
..
.:.
.•.
.,.
~
Figures (9-3.16a -d) Scannin g electron microgr aphs (shown after 120 min
reaction time) showing the effect of initial gold concen tration
on Au(ffi) bromid e/Zn cement ation (0.10 M Na13r (20°C,
pH:5.00 , 1000 rpm); (a) 10 mg/I (b) 20 mg/I (c) 50 mg/1 (d)
100 mg/I Au(III).
239
Figures (9-3.16a-d) therefore demonstrate very clearly that the nature and
morphology of the deposit control the rates of the Au(ill) bromide/Zn
cementation reaction. Both the initial and enhanced rates of reaction increased
with increase in Au(III) concentration.
At 0.001 M NaBr as shown in figure (9-3. l 7a), the gold deposit seems to
nucleate and grow only at isolated locations (ie, well localised) on the substrate
surface around the perimeters of large zinc dissolution pits; with
coherent/compact dendritic stmcture. This orientation (ie., restricted growth
area) on one hand prevails for rapid nucleation and growth for optimum initial
kinetic conditions. On the other hand, the resultant dense/compact deposit
possibly reduced the available surface area and inhibited the diffusion process
and perhaps zinc dissolution rate which caused the retarded cementation rate.
Similarly, at 0.010 M NaBr as shown in figure (9-3.17b), the relatively less
coherent, intertwined dend1itic structure was also localised, thus supporting a
lower initial reaction rate and higher enhanced rate than at 0.001 M NaBr.
At a higher NaBr concentration as shown in figure (9-3. l 7c) for 0.050 M NaBr
solution, the deposit was non-dendritic but coarser crystalline/botryoidal type
and occmTed over a wider area on the zinc substrate than at 0.001 M and 0.010
M NaBr which could support a lower initial reaction rate and a higher enhanced
reaction rate than at 0.010 M NaBr. The changes in reaction artes are apparent:
At low NaBr concentration, the increased rate of reaction is due to the
development of a structured surface deposit which acts as though the surface
240
area available for reaction has been increased. For high initial concentration of
NaBr concentrations, the enhanced rate may not be seen because the critical
deposit mass density is reached almost immediately.
However, for a solution containing 100 mg/I Au(III) ions , increasing the NaBr
concentration from 0.01 to 0.50 M exhibited a reverse kinetic behaviour to that
observed for a solution containing 10 mg/1 Au(III) ions at 20°C, pH:5.00 and
1000 rpm. Thus, the initi al reaction rate increased w ith increasing NaBr from
243
0.01 M to 0.10 M and decreased at 0.50 M, while the enhanced reaction rate
decreased with increasing NaBr concentration from 0.01 M to 0.50 M.
Figures (9-3.18a-d) shows the scanning electron micrographs for 100 mg/1
Au(ID) bromide/Zn cementation in (a) 0.01 M, (b) 0.05 M (c) 0.10 M (d) 0.50
M NaBr solution (containing 98 mg/1 Br2 (aq)) at 20°C, pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm.
Figures (9-3 .18a-c) show that the changes/differences in the nature of the
dendritic deposits obtained as free NaBr concentration increased from 0.01 to
0.10 Mare such that the deposits became more dense/compact and thicker with
decreasing deposit smface area and explains the various kinetic changes.
At 0.01 M NaBr (figure (9-3 .18a), a secondary finely textured dendritic deposit
with well dispersed branches fo1med over the substrate smface which was
responsible for the high enhanced period reaction rate. At 0.05 M NaBr (figure
(9-3.18b), the secondary dendrites formed were longer and more closely
intertwined in nature than those evident in figure (9-3.18a) for 0.01 M NaBr
solution, which supported a relatively lower enhanced period reaction rate. Also
at a higher NaBr solution as in figure (9-3.18c) for 0.10 M NaBr, the secondary
dendrites formed were more dense and had longer bulbous branches than the
dendrites formed at 0.05 M NaBr. This structure supposedly contributed a
relatively more pronounced effect on the diffusional process governing the
cementation reaction, thereby leading to a much lower rate of reaction than at
0.05 M NaBr.
Figure (9-3.1 8d) also shows that the deposit morphology had a distinct change
at 0.50 M NaBr solution where an initial scattered fine bulbous deposition took
place with secondary cluster-like thick bulbous-type dendrites. Certainly. this
deposition contributed immensely to the low initial and enhanced reaction rates
associated with the cement.at.ion at 0.50 M TaBr.
246
The Au(ill) bromide/Zn cementation reaction kinetics were further followed and
characterised at various kinetic variables using zinc suspended particles. The
cementation studies were conducted with large excess of zinc particles to ensure
that the surface area remained constant during reactions. The kinetics (reaction
velocity) were evaluated according to the first-order equation.
Figures (9-4. la-b) show the plots of log ([Au]tf[Au] 0 ) against time for (a) 10
mg/I (b) 100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation
respectively in 0.10 M NaBr solution at 20°C, pH: 5.00, 500 rpm using (i)
38X45 µm (ii) 45X63 µm (iii) 63X 106 µm zinc particles.
(AuBr4-I • 10 mg/I
[NaBr) • 0.1 M
~0.6
pH • 6.00
Temp.· 20 C
RPM. - 600
-1.0
-B- 83•108 um
-2.0 1 - - - - 1 - - - - + - - t - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - t - - + - - - - + - - ~
0 6 10 15 20 26 30 35 40
Time, (mlna)
Log([Au)t/[Aulo)
-1 [NaBr] • 0.1 M
pH • 6.00
Temp.• 20 C
RPM.• 600
-2
-3 - - 38••5 um
lnltlel solution vol. • 600 ml.
-t- •5•83 um
-a- 83•108 um
-~~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time, (mine)
Figure (9-4.lb) Variation of Iog([Au]tf[Au] 0 ) with time for 100 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M
NaBr (containing 98 mg/I Br2 (aq)) at 20°C, 500 rpm,
pH:5.00, (i) 38X45 µm (ii) 45X63 µm (iii) 63Xl06 µm.
Table (9-4.1) The reaction velocity/rate constants for different zinc particle
sizes in the Au(ID) bromide/Zn system (0.10 M NaBr; pH:
5.00; 20°C; 500 rpm; Au(III): (i) 10 mg/I (ii) 100 mg/I).
k(1);k(2)(E-03) (cm/s)
20~--------------------~
15
pH= 5.00
Temp.= 20 C
RPM.= 500
10
o~---~---~----~---~---~
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
1/do, um--1
k(1);k(2)(E-03) (cm/s)
60.-------------------------,
(AuBr4-] = 100 me/I
--- InlUal rate, k(l)
(NaBr] = 0.10 K
50 -+- Enhanced rate, k(2)
40 pH= 11.00
Temp.= 20 C
30 RPII. = 1100
20
10
IniUal aoluUon vol. = 1100 ml.
o~---~---~---~----~---~
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
1/do, um--1
The results are presented in first-order plots in figure (9-4.3). As expected, these
plots follow a two-stage reaction kinetics and reflect a dependence of the
reaction velocity/rate on the amount of particulate zinc. The first-order reaction
rates/velocities are dependent on surface area which is directly proportional to
the amount of zinc precipitant. At a fixed initial particle size, the rate expression
in equation (5-3.8) reflects the surface area effect through the zinc value (g).
Accordingly, the rate/velocity should be a linear function of amount of zinc.
However, as shown in figure (9-4.4), both the initial and enhanced reaction
rate/velocity constants decreased with increased amount of particulate zinc. This
means that the presence of excess amounts of zinc particles caused some sort of
diffusional resistance in the solution. Addition of a large number of suspended
particles significantly increase the reaction kinetics (Miller, 1981 ). The rate
250
Log([Au)t/(Aulo)
o.
(AuBr4-I • 100 mg/I
-1.0
[NaBr] • 0.1 M
pH• 5.00
-2.0 Temp.· 20 C
RPM.• 600
- o.oeo4g zn
Zinc particle size • 38"46 um.
-t- 0.1250g Zn
-4.0 lnl tlal solution vol. • 500 ml.
-A- 0.2600g Zn
-B- 0.6000g Zn
-s.o~--~--~---~--~--~------'~-~
0 6 10 15 20 26 30 36
Time (mlna)
Figure (9-4.3) Variation of log (concentration ratio) with time for 100 mg/I
Au{ill) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr (containing 98 mg/I Br2 (aq)); 20°C; pH:5.00;
500 rpm at different zinc amounts.
k(1);k(2)(E-03) )cm/s)
50~----------------------~
[AuBr4-] = 100 me/I
IniUal rate, k( 1)
[NaBr] = 0.10 I{
40
-+- Enhanced rate, k(2)
pH= 5.00
Temp.= 20 C
30
RPM.= 500
10
Figure (9-4.5) represents the first-order plots for a series of experiments carried
out for 100 mg/I Au(III) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) in 0.10 M NaBr
solution (containing 98 mg/I Br2 (aq)) at different stirring speeds of 100, 300,
500, 700 rpm (20°C; pH: 5.00).
Clearly, these first-order plots followed two-stage kinetics as observed using the
rotating-disc geometry. The reaction velocity constants (calculated from the
geometric slopes of the plots) are also plotted in figure (9-4.6) for the different
stiffing speeds. Both the initial and enhanced reaction rates/velocities are in
strong dependence on the square-root of the stiffing speeds which supports a
mass-transfer controlled process for the Au(Ill) bromide/Zn (suspended
particles) cementation reaction.
252
Log([Au)t/[Aulo)
[NaBr] • 0.1 M
-1
pH• o.00
Temp.· 20 C
-2
Stirring epHd
- 100 RPM.
-3 -+- 300 RPM.
Zinc particle ela • 88•46 um.
-A- 1500 RPM.
lnltlal eolutlon vol. • 600 ml.
-a- 700 RPM.
-4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time, (mlna)
Figure (9-4.5) Variation of log (concentration ratio) with time for 100 mg/I
Au(ill) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr (98 mg/I Br2 (aq)); 20°C; pH:5.00; at (i) 100 (ii)
300 (iii) 500 (iv) 700 rpm.
k(1)/k(2)(E-03) (cm/s)
50...--------------------------,
[A.uBr.(-] = 100 ma:/l
Initial rate, k(l)
[NaBr] = 0.10 M
40
-+- Enhanced rate, k(2)
pH= 5.00
Temp. = 20 C
30
10
0 2 4 6 8 10
w-1/2, {rad/s)-1/2)
Figure (9-4.6) Variation of reaction velocity constants with the square root
of stirring speed for 100 mg/I Au(III) bromide/Zn (suspended
particles) in 0.10 M NaBr solution (containing 98 mg/I Br2
(aq)); at 20°C and pH:5.00.
253
However, at lower strrnng speed (ie., 100 rpm), an inhibiting effect was
observed after 10 minutes of cementation resulting in a lower second-stage
reaction rate/velocity (0.569X 10-3 emfs) than the first-stage reaction
rate/velocity (1.155X 10-3 emfs). This may be attributed to the nature of the
deposit morphology under this condition.
Nevertheless, the reaction velocity constants can be seen to correlate well with
the reaction rate constants for 200, 500, 1000, and 1500 rpm observed using the
rotating-disc geometry as shown in table (9-3.1). The variation of the reaction
velocity with stirring speed can also be related to an increase in slip velocity (or
mass-transfer coefficient) resulting from the deposit growth as stirring speed
increased.
The reaction velocity/rate constants for the cementation reaction at the various
temperatures and 500 rpm are plotted on an Arrhenius plot as shown in figures
(9-4.8a-b ). The activation energies calculated from the slopes of these plots for
both initial and enhanced rate periods are also shown in table (9-4.2). These ~E
(activation energy) values are consistent with that expected for film diffusion as
the rate-limiting step. The ~E (activation energy) values also compare well with
the ~E (activation energy) values of 2.50 kcal/mol (10.50 k.J/mol) for initial rate
pe1iod and 3.13 kcal/mol (13.12 kJ/mol) for the enhanced rate period obtained
from the Au(III) bromide/Zn (rotating-disc) cementation reaction.
254
Log((Au)t/(Au)o)
0,0A...,.....----------------------,
(AuBr4-I • 10 mg/I
-0.5
(NaBr] • 0.1 M
pH • 6.00
-1.6
- 10C
-+- 20 C
-2.0
~ 30C Zinc particle size • 38'46 um
-A- 40 C lnltlal solutlon vol. • 600 ml
-2.5
0 5 10 15 20 26 30 35 40 46
Time, (mlns)
Log((Au)t/(Au]o)
[NaBr] • 0.1 M
-2
pH • 6.00
RPM. • 600
-4
- 10C
-6 -+- 20 C
-A- SO C Zinc particle size • 38'46 um.
-a- 40 C Initial solution vol. • 600 ml.
-6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time, (mlna)
Figure (9-4. 7b) Variation of log{[Au]tf[Au] 0 ) with time for 100 mg/I Au(III)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M
NaBr (containing 98 mg/I Brz (aq)); at pH: 5.00; 500 rpm
and (i) 10°c (ii) 20°c (iii) 30°C (iv) 40°C.
255
In k{l) or k(2)
-3.5 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
(AuBr4-] = 10 mc/1
lnltlal rate, k( 1)
[NaBr) = 0.10 M
-4.0 -+- Enhanced rate, k(2)
pH= 5.00
RPM. = 500
-4.5
~.o
-6.0 ~ - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - ~
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
1000/T, (1/K)
In k(l) or k(2)
o~-------------------------,
[AuBr4-] = 100 m1t/l
lnlUal rate, k( 1)
[NaBr) = 0.10 ),(
-1 -+- Enhanced rate, k(2)
pH= 5.00
-2
RPM.= 500
-3
- 4 'Zinc
_5 1
=particle
== ~--=========d
llize = 38"45 um.
lniUal aoluUon vol. = 500 ml.
-6 .___ ____,___ _ _.___ ____,___ _ _..___ ____,___ _ _.....___ ___,
3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7
1000/T, (l/K)
Figure (9-4.Sb) Arrhenius plots for 100 mg/I Au(Ill) bromide/Zn (suspended
particles) cementation in 0.10 M NaBr (containing 98 mg/I
Br2 (aq)) at pH:5.00 and 500 rpm.
256
Table (9-4.2) The experimental activation energies (~E) for the Au(ill)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) system (0.10 M NaBr; pH:
5.00; 20°c; 500 rpm; Au(III): (i) 10 mg/I (ii) 100 mg/I)
Log([Au)t/(Aulo)
[NaBr] • 0.1 M
-1
pH • 5.00
Temp.• 20 C
-2
RPM. • 600
-3
lnltlal [AuBr4·)
--4 - 10 ppm
+ 20 ppm
-6 -A- 150 ppm Zinc particle size • 39•45 um
--a-- 100 ppm Initial solution vol. • 600 ml
-6
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time, (mlna)
Figure (9-4.9) Variation of log([Ault/[Au] 0 ) with time for (i) 10 mg/I (ii) 20
mg/I (iii) 50 mg/I (iv) 100 mg/I Au(lll) bromide/Zn
(suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M NaBr solution
at 20°C, pH:5.00 and 500 rpm.
257
These plots also show a significant change in the reaction velocity as the initial
gold concentration changed from 10 mg/I to 100 mg/I, as observed under zinc
rotating-disc geometry. The two-stage kinetic reactions are also apparent in
these plots. Table (9-4.3) lists the reaction velocity/rate constants calculated
from figure (9-4.9) for the different initial concentrations of gold. The increased
rate/velocity of reaction was due to the development of a coarser, more porous
botryoidal/bulbous to dendritic deposits as initial gold concentration increased.
10 6.009 6.342
20 7.770 8.124
50 10.074 13.395
Figures (9-4.l0a-b) also show the effect of free bromide concentration on the
first-order plots for (a) 10 mg/I Au(III) bromide cementation in 0.001 M; 0.010
M; 0.050 M; 0.100 M; 0.500 M NaBr (b) 100 mg/1 Au(III) bromide cementation
in 0.01 M; 0.05 M; 0.10 M; 0.50 M NaBr respectively on suspended zinc
particles (38X45 µm) at 20°c, pH: 5.00 and 500 rpm.
258
[AuBr4-] = 10 me/I
-0.4
pH= 5.00
-0.8 Temp.= 20 C
RPM.= 500
Initial [NaBr]
-2.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time, (mins)
Log([Aultt[Aulo)
pH• 6.00
-2
Temp. • 20 C
RPM. - 600
-3 lnltlal [NaBr]
- 0.01 M NaBr
-4 -t- 0.011 M NaBr
-A- 0.10 M NaBr
-5 --e- 0.20 M NaBr Zinc particle size • 38"45 um.
~ 0.60 M NaBr Initial solution vol. • 600 ml.
-6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time, (mlna)
Figure (9-4.l0b) Variation of log([AuJt/[Au] 0 ) with time for 100 mg/I Au(III)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in (i) 0.01 M
(ii) 0.05 M (iii) 0.10 M (iv) 0.50 M NaBr (Br2 (aq): 9.8 mg/I);
20°C; pH:5.00; 500 rpm.
259
The variation in the reaction velocity/rate constants for (a) 10 mg/I (b) 100 mg/I
Au(ill) bromide /Zn (suspended particles) at the different free sodium bromide
concentrations investigated are also presented in figures (9-4.11) and (9-4.12).
These results also attest to the various kinetic behaviour of the first-order plots
observed for Au(ill) bromide cementation on zinc rotating-disc geometry. The
relative merits/importance of the addition of free bromide (>0.01 M )especially
at low initial gold concentrations are evident from these results. Figure (9-4.11)
indicate an optimum bromide concentration of 0.05 M to sustain a well-behaved
first-order kinetics. At lower bromide concentrations (<0.01 M) and at low gold
concentration, a deviation from the first-order kinetics was observed after 10
minutes of cementation. This was probably due to an inhibiting effect of the
deposit growth on the diffusional flux and presumably the dissolution of zinc
which tends to control the process. An initial growth of the deposit on dendrites
became dense and less distributed around the zinc particles as cementation
progressed.
k(1);k(2)(E-03) (cm/s)
12..--------------------------,
[AuBr4-] = 10 me/I
- - InlU&l rate, k(l)
-+- Enhanced rate, k(2)
pH= 5.00
Temp.= 20 C
6
RPM.= 1500
o~---'---~-~--~--~-~--~----'
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6
[NaBr], mole/litre
This behaviour also corresponds to a big anodic shift in the solution potential
(from -0.636 V at 1 minute of cementation to -0.184 V at 10 minutes of
cementation for 0.001 M NaBr and from -0.727 Vat 1 minute cementation to -
0.532 V at 10 minutes of cementation for 0.010 M NaBr) (refer appendix (9-
4.1)), indicating a change in the controlling mechanism of the process from
mass-transport diffusion controlled to electrochemical (or charge transfer)
controlled. At higher NaBr concentration (0.050 M and 0.100 M), the gold
deposits formed on the zinc particles were sufficiently porous to maintain
structural integrity for a mass-transport boundary-layer diffusion-control
mechanism throughout the cementation reaction. Thus for extended times
associated with greater gold recovery from the Au(ill) bromide/zinc suspended
particles cementation circuits, under these conditions, higher concentration of
bromide (ie 0.05 M- 0.10 M) is essential.
However, for 100 mg/I Au(ill) bromide as shown in figures (9-4.l0b) and (9-
4.12), well-behaved first-order kinetics were followed at each NaBr
concentration considered but the enhanced reaction rate/velocity constant
decreased as bromide concentration increased.
k(l);k(2)(E-03) (cm/s)
50..----------------------,
(AuBr4-] = 100 mi/1
- Initial rate, k(l)
40
-+- Enhanced rate, k(2)
pH= 5.00
Temp.= 20 C
RPM.= 500
30
10
0 L-----'----'----~----'------'-----~-~-___.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
[NaBr], mole/litre
Figure (9-4.12) Variation of reaction velocity constants for 100 mg/I Au(III)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation with NaBr
concentration (containing 98 mg/I Br2 (aq)) at 20°C; pH:5.00
and 500 rpm.
261
The rate of the cementation reaction with respect to the concentration of pH ions
on the Au(IlI) bromide cementation reaction on suspended zinc particles (38X45
µm) is first order and shows in figure (9-4.13) for 100 mg/1 Au(IIl); 0.10 M
NaBr (containing 98 mg/1 Br2 (aq)); 20°C; 500 rpm and pH values from 2.00 to
7.00. Figure (9-4.14) shows the variation of the reaction velocity constants with
pH. Table (9-4.4) also lists the calculated initial and enhanced reaction
velocities/rates.
Log([Au)t/(Au)o)
-1 [NaBr) • 0.1 M
Temp.• 20 C
RPM. • 600
-2 lnltlal sol. pH
- - pH• 2.00
-+- pH• 3.00
-3 -A- pH • 4.00
Zinc particle size • 38"46 um.
-B- pH • 15.00
Initial solution vol. • 600 ml.
-•.____ __
--V-- pH•7.00
_._ ___,_ ____,____,_____._____.____,
0 6 10 16 20 26 30 35
Time, (mine)
Figure (9-4.13) Variation of log (concentration ratio) with time for 100 mg/I
Au(ID) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr solution (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I) at 20°C, 500 rpm
and (i) pH:2.00 (ii) pH:3.00 (iii) pH:4.00 (iv) pH:5.00 (v)
pH:7.00.
k(1);k(2){E-03) (cm/s)
60,--------------------------,
[AuBr4-] = 100 me/I
InlUal rate, k(l)
[NaBr] = 0.10 M
50 -+- Enhanced rate, k(2)
Temp.= 20 C
40 RPM.= liOO
20
10
Figure (9-4.14) Variation of reaction velocity constants with pH for 100 mg/I
/
The variation in reaction rates/velocities between pH: 5.00 and pH: 7.00 is
likely to be due to the relative reduction in diffusion coefficient and activity of
diffusing species at pH:7.00 which is directly related to the rate of mass transfer
to the zinc surface.
20 minutes of cementation
This can be reconciled with the variation of the solution potential (refer
appendix (9-4.3)) to be explained by a change in the diffusion controlled
mechanism to a smface reaction mechanism or pore diffusion process.
Nevertheless, the variations in the reaction rate/velocity under this study, can be
explained in terms of changes in the deposit morphology. The deposits were
seen to be botryoidal/bulbous types of dendritic structmes of different degrees
of texture and size (similar in structure to those obtained/observed for Au(III)
bromide cementation on zinc rotating-disc).
Figure (9-4.15) reveals the nature of the gold deposit on the reacted zmc
particles as observed under the optical microscope.
J\t 10 rn g/1 /\u(III) brom ide conce ntration (ri g ure (9---l . 17a), an initial srnm)th
dcp1J-;1\11J11 ,tnlund the 1i11c particles \\J.S lollo\,ed hy J thin /sma ll -;cull'1cd
p11llrt1-,I\Hhl~r,rnth 1lf hotryoidal/crystalline type ()r " tru c turc. The i11l'Il',hl' 111
-.,url-tcL' ,lll'.t (d uL' to mughncs-,) in this ca-;c. had a 111ar~inal -.,ig11ificant cikL·t ,i11
thL' Il',tL'tHln r,11d,elnc 1t \.
266
These results also indicate that surface roughness was of major importance in
the Au(ID) bromide cementation on zinc suspended particles unlike the
Au(CN)i-/Zn (suspended particles) system reported by Miller, Wan and Parga
(Miller et al, 1990). Thus, the surface velocity (or slip velocity) was significant
in distorting the boundary layer or microstreaming at the surface of the particles.
Consequently, the nature of the smface deposit had great impact on the reaction
velocity constant. Similar results were observed for the Au(III) bromide
cementation on zinc rotating-disc.
Figures (9-4.18a-b) show the effect of zinc particle size on the deposit stmcture
for 10 mg/I Au(ID) bromide/Zn cementation in 0.10 M NaBr solution
(containing 9.8 mg/I Br2 (aq)) at 20°C, pH: 5.00 and 500 rpm. At zinc particle
size range of 45X53 µm, (figure (9-4.18a), compared with figure (9-4.17a) for
zinc particle size range, 38X45 µm, the deposit was much smoother with less
significant secondary crystalline growths. At higher zinc particle size range,
63X 106 µm, shown in figure (9-4.18b), the deposit lacked entirely any
secondary growth.
This effect is further illustrated in figure (9-4.19a-b) for 100 mg/I Au(III)
bromide/Zn cementation in 0.10 M NaBr solution (containing 98 mg/I Br2 (aq))
at 20°C, pH:5.00 and 500 rpm.
269
Figure (9-4.19a- b) Scanning electron microgra phs showing the effect of zinc
particle size on Au(III) bromide/ Zn (suspend ed particles )
cementat ion ( 100 mg/I Au(ID) in 0.10 M Nailr (contain ing
98 mg/I Ilr2 (aq)), 20°C, pH: 5.00, 500 rpm); (a) 45X 53 µm
and (b) 63X 106 µm .
271
Figu re (9-4. 20a- c) Scan ning elect ron micr ogra phs show ing the effec
t of stirr ing
spee d on Au(I II) brom ide/Z n (susp ende
d parti cles)
ceme ntati on (100 mg/I Au(I II), 0.10 M NaB r (con
taini ng 98
mg/I Br2 (aq)) , 20°C , pH: 5.00) ;(a) 100 rpm (b)
300 rpm , (c)
700 rpm.
273
Although, the slope of the first-order curve under this condition was higher than
that at 0.0604 g Zn, it is possible that, this deposit reduced the available surface
area (roughness) on the individual particles to sustain the diffusional process
and hence resulted in the lower reaction rate character.
Invariably, for the experimental conditions employed in this study under the
effect of free bromide, pH and temperature, the deposits on the zinc suspended
particles were bulbous/bot:ryoidal crystal masses (for low initial gold
concentrations) and dendritic structures (for high initial gold concentrations) of
different degrees of texture and size. Almost without exception, these deposits
under the various kinetic conditions were comparable to the deposits obtained
on zinc rotating-discs as discussed in section (9-3-2). The structure and
morphology of the deposits modified themselves according to changes in the
experimental parameters. A change in the smface roughness (ie., effective
deposition surface area) of the reacted zinc particles as a result of such
modification to the deposit morphology resulted in the observed variations in the
reaction rate/velocity.
275
For a film diffusion controlled reaction, the relationship between the fraction of
zinc suspended particles reacted (a= {l -(rli"a) 3 }) and time (t) is well established
and is given by equation (5-5.7), such that:
(9-4.2)
where km is reaction rate constant (emfs), Mzn is the molecular weight of zinc
(g/mol), Pzn is the density of zinc (g/cm3).
The plots of a= {l-(r/r0 )3} against tare shown in figures (9-4.22a-b) for (a) 10
mg/I (b) 100 mg/I Au(ID) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation
respectively in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:5.00, 500 rpm and (i) 38x45 µm (ii)
45x63 µm (iii) 63x 106 µm zinc particle sizes
These results illustrate that, in the initial stages of reaction (0-7 minutes), the
reaction displays linear relationships/kinetics for the inverse of particle diameter
(l/d 0 ), which supports the assumption of film diffusion control mechanism. This
can be seen to be followed by diffusion-through-the-product-layer control
mechanism. Thus, in accordance with equations (9-4.2) and (5-5.9):
276
1-(r/ro)·s
0.10 . - - - - - - . - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - ~
0.08
(Au8r4-J • 10 mg/I
(NaBrl • 0.10 M
0.06 pH• 8.00
Temp.• 20 C
D
RPM.• 600
0.04
D
--- 38•45 um
0 5 10 15 20 25 so 35 40 45 50
Time, (mlna)
Figure (9-4.22a) Plots of l -(r/r0 ) 3 versus time for 10 mg/I Au(ID) bromide/Zn
(suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M NaBr ( 9.8 mg/I
Br2 (aq)), at 20°C, pH:5.00, 500 rpm and (i) 38X45 µm (ii)
45X63 µm (iii) 63X106 µm zinc particle size ranges.
1-(r/roJ-3
0.8 ,-------r--------r--------y------,
+ pH• 6.00
0.4 * Temp.• 20 C
RPM.• 500
0 5 10 15 20 25 so 35 40 45
Time, (mlna)
Figure (9-4.22b) Plots of I -(r/r0 ) 3 versus time for 100 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M
NaBr (98 mg/I Br2 (aq)), at 20°C, pH:5.00, SOO rpm and (i)
38X45 µm (ii) 45X63 µm (iii) 63Xl06 µm zinc particle size
ranges.
277
1-(2/3)x-(1-x>-2l3 (E-04)
10.-----------------~-------,
IAuBr4-I • 10 mg/I pH• &.00
- 38•46 um INaBrl • 0.10 M T•mp. • 20 C
8
+ 4&•83 um
RPM.• 1500
D 83•108 um
Figure (9-4.23a) Plots of 1-(2/3)a-(1-a) 213 versus time for 10 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M
NaBr (Br2 (aq): 9.8 mg/I) at 20°C, pH:5.00, 500 rpm and (i)
38X45 µm (ii) 45X63 µm (iii) 63X106 µm zinc particle size
range.
1-(2/3)x-(1-xr213
0.08 . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , ,
(AuBr4-I • 100 mg/I
• 38•46 um
(NaBrl • 0.10 M
+ 4&•88 um
0.06 0 83•108 um
0.04
Temp.• 20 C
RPM.• SOO
0.02
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time, (mlns)
Figure (9-4.23b) Plots of 1-(2/3)a -(1- a) 213 versus time for 100 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M
NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I) at 20°C, pH:5.00, 500 rpm and (i)
38x45 µm (ii) 45X63 µm (iii) 63Xl06 µm zinc particle size
range.
278
(9-4.3)
where kr = JPM~n
Zn 0
km and t is time between O and 7 minutes, and
(9-4.4)
Further, from the slopes of the curves in figures (9-4.22a-b), the mass transfer
coefficients (or the reaction rate/velocity constants) calculated using equation
(9-4.3) are shown in table (9-4.5). These rate data are in reasonable agreement
with the calculated rate/velocity constants listed in table (9-4.1) for the different
zinc particle size ranges.
10 38X45 7.120
45X63 3.509
63X 106 2.136
From the slopes of the (38x45 µm) curves in figures (9-4.23a-b), the deviation
in the plots at longer times might be mass-transfer limitations. This should be
279
expected because the supply of reactants and the removal of products through
the layer becomes limiting.
280
CHAPTER TEN
10-1 CONCLUSION
The polarization (1-E) curves from this study showed evidence of three reactions
involved in the reduction process corresponding to the reduction of residual
bromine species at 0.60 V (vs SCE), gold-bromide ions at -0.25 V (vs SCE) and
dissolved oxygen in the same potential region for the reduction of Au(III)
bromide ions. In addition, at potentials cathodic to -1.30 V (vs SCE), hydrogen
will evolve from the reduction of H20/J-{+ ions and the cunent becomes limited
at potential cathodic to about -0.70 V (vs SCE). The magnitude of the limiting
cun-ent densities for the reduction of AuBr4 - also showed a linear dependence
on the square root of the rotational speed of the disc, indicating a mass-transfer
controlled mechanism governing the reaction.
The Evans diagrams constructed from the polarisation curves of the oxidation
and reduction half-cell reactions confirmed that the Au(III) bromide/Zn system
is controlled by a diffusion step. The potential separation of the equilibrium
lines of the two half-cell reactions involved in the process is greater than the
typical value of 360 m V for a diffusion control system and there exists a unique
mixed (or con-osion) potential (around - 1.00 V (vs SCE)) at which the rate of
the anodic reaction is equal but opposite to that of the cathodic reaction. Under
ideal conditions, there will be no thermodynamic restriction to the completion of
the reaction. The kinetics controlling the cementation reaction will be
determined by the rate at which Au(III) ions diffuse onto the zinc surface. The
Evans diagrams also indicated that, excess zinc has to be used to react with the
residual bromine and dissolved oxygen besides the Au(III) bromide ion
reduction. In effect, the reaction kinetics are strongly dependent on the gold
concentration, bromine concentration, bromide concentration, pH, dissolved
oxygen and temperature of the solution.
For practical applications, Br 2 (aq) should be as low as possible and the solution
should be de-oxygenated. The addition of free bromide solution (0.01- 0.10 M)
during zinc cementation of gold from bromide leach liquors is essential. At
lower bromide concentrations ( < 0.01 M), the reaction will proceed under an
electrochemical or charge transfer control step and may lead to the complete
cessation of the reaction. Inordinate bromide concentrations (> 0.10 M) will
lead to accelerated con-osion of zinc and Au(lll) bromide ions will be reduced at
2X2
M NaBr. In this case, both the initial and enhanced rates decreased at 0.50 M.
Invariably, the initial rates of cementation increased slightly with decrease in pH
from 7 .00 and then increased sharply for further decrease in pH from 4.00 to
2.00. This kinetic behaviour was associated with high zinc dissolution rates at
low pH values. In addition, at pl-1:2.00. the second stage reaction rate was lower
than the initial rate. Thus, for cost effective cementation process, the reaction
should be conducted at close to neutral conditions (ie., between pH:5.00 to
7.00).
rate period at I 0 mg/I Au(III) and 2.89 kcal/rnol ( 12.07 kJ/mol) for initial rate
period and 6.76 kcal/mol (28.27 kJ/mol) at I 00 mg/I Au(III) and 38x45 ~Lm
which are also consistent with the expected values for diffusion mechanism. The
reaction velocity constants also exhibited strong dependence on the inverse of
particle diameter and the square-root of stirring speed.
The nature of the gold deposit on the reacted zinc particles, under optical and
scanning electron microscopes showed that the gold formed a layer around the
zinc particles with sufficient porosity to sustain the first-order kinetics. The gold
deposits indicated that surface roughness was of major significance in the
Au(III) bromide cementation on zinc suspended particles unlike the Au(CNh-
/Zn (suspended particles) cementation process. An increase in particulate zinc
amount from 0.0604 g Zn (2.43 times the stoichiometric requirement) to 0.5000
g Zn (20.10 times the stoichiometric requirement) reduced the available surface
roughness on the individual particles to sustain the diffusional process and
hence resulted in lower reaction rate character. For the experimental conditions
tested in this study the deposits on the zinc suspended particles were
bulbous/botryoidal crystal masses (for low initial gold concentrations) and
dendritic structures (for high initial gold concentrations) of different degrees of
texture and sizes (similar in structure to those observed for the Au(III) bromide
cementation on zinc rotating-disc). The change in the nature and morphology of
the deposits corresponded to the observed kinetic behaviour.
This study was conducted to provide fundamental kinetic data on gold recovery
by zinc cementation from bromine-bromide solutions as a recovery option for
the bromide/bromine leaching system for gold extraction. Zinc cementation was
claimed to be highly efficient method for gold recovery from bromine-bromide
solutions (Dadgar, 1989; Dadgar et al, 1990), but no detailed evaluation or
reported literature was extended beyond this claim.
Gold ores contain a number of impurity minerals which could be trapped in the
bromide leach liquors/solutions.
(1) To cope with the increasing complexity of these gold ores (due to these
impurities) further work is recommended/suggested to test the optimum kinetic
conditions against bromide leach solutions from gold ores of different
mineralisations. Electrochemical measurements should also be extended to
evaluate the effect of arsenic, antimony and sulphide ions on the rate of
cementation of gold from bromine/bromide solutions.
(2) In view of the significant role of lead in improving the kinetics and
extending the zinc cementation of gold and silver in cyanide systems (Oo and
Tran, 1991 ), the effect of lead on the reaction rate constants and the deposit
286
(3) Results of the work carried out in this study showed a marked deleterious
effect of H+ ions on the kinetics of the cementation of gold from the bromine-
bromide system, especially at low pH values. Although, faster kinetics are
obtainable under these conditions, excessive amounts of zinc dissolve under the
influence of a corrosion process. Hydrogen evolution becomes more
predominant as the pH of the solution is decreased. At low initial gold
concentration, the zinc cementation reaction is also inhibited by copious
evolution of hydrogen accompanying the reaction.
Since Au(III) bromide ions are more stable in acidic conditions, a comparative
study towards raising the hydrogen overpotential on both zinc and gold smfaces
for better kinetics is recommended.
(4) The study also indicated that, the presence of Br 2 (aq) or the aqua-bromide
species in the cementation circuit inte1fere with the Au(III) bromide ions
reduction reaction. However, bromine is an essential component of the gold
dissolution/oxidation in bromide liquors and its total removal in the system
cannot be waITanted. The existence and relative predominance of AuBr 4 -ions in
bromine-bromide solutions also depend on the strength of Br 2 . A more detailed
work on the effect of Br 2 may be worthwhile for the purpose of process design.
287
REFERENCES
Adamson, R.J., Gold metallurgy in South Africa, (Cape and Transvaal Printers
Limited, Cape Town, 1972).
Ashurst, K.G. and Finkelstein, N.P., The influence of sulphydryl and cationic
flotation reagents on the flotation of native gold, J.S. Afr. Inst. Min.
Metall., Vol. 70, (1970), pp. 243-258.
Avraamides, J., Prospective for alternative leaching systems for gold, In: Proc.
C.I.P. Technology for the Extraction of Gold Symposia, Series No 32,
(Aus IMM, Melbourne, 1982), pp. 369-382.
Avraamides, J., Changing trends in gold ore treatment in Western Australia; the
problem of refractory ores, In: Gold Forum on Technology and Practices
- World Gold '89, Eds: Bhappu, R.B. and Harden, R.J., Proc. 1st Joint
Int. Meeting between SME and Aus IMM, Reno, Nevada, USA,
(SME/AIME, Littleton), (1989), pp. 333-336.
Avraamides, J., CIP carbons - selection, testing and pilot plant monitoring, Proc.
World Gold '89 Symp. AIME, (1989), pp. 288-292
Bahl, S.K. and Leach, G.L., Gold etchant composition and method, U.S. Patent
No. 4,190,489 (1980); and 4,375,984, (1983).
Barbin, M.B., The influence of flotation agents on the dissolution of gold and
silver by a cyanide treatment, Sb. Nauchn. Tr. Uralsk. Politekhn. Inst.,
No. 134, (1963), pp. 101-102.
Bard, A.J. and Faulkner, L.R., Electrochemical methods, (Wiley, New York,
1980).
Barin, I., Barth, H. and Yaman, A., Electrochemical investigation of the kinetics
of gold cementation by zinc from cyanide solutions, Erzmetall, Vol. 33,
No. 7/8, (1980), pp. 379-403.
Beattie, M.J., Balderson, G. and Foo, K., Application of the Arseno process
technology for refractory ores and concentrates, Randol Perth lnt. Gold
Conference, Oct. 28 - Nov. I, (1988), (Randol International, Colorado),
p. 123.
Berg, E.W. and Downey, D.M., Ion flotation studies of the chlorocomplexes of
some platinum group metals, Analytica Chimica Acta, 120 (1980), pp.
237-248.
Beyers, E., Some of the factors which influence the dissolution of gold and
silver in cyanide solutions, J. Chem. Metall., Min. Soc., South Africa, 37,
(1936), pp. 37-89.
Bilston, D.W., LaBrooy, S.R. and Woodcock, J.T., Gold and silver leaching
from an oxidized gold ore with thiourea under controlled conditions, In:
Extractive Metallurgy Symposium, (Aus IMM, Melbourne), (1984), pp.
51-60.
Bloch, M., Das Buch der Grossen Chemiker, Vol. 2, Ed: Bugge, G., Verlag
Chemie, Weinheim, (1929), p. 99.
Block-Bolten, A., Daita, M.S., T01ma, A.E. and Steensma, R., Thiosulphate
leaching of gold from sulphide wastes, In: Complex sulphides, processing
of ores, concentrates and by-products, Eds: Zunkel, A.D., Boorman, R.S.,
Morris, A.E. and Wesley, R.J., (TMS, 1985).
Boyle, R.W., The geochemistry of gold and its deposits, (Canadian Gov't.
Publishing Centre, Quebec, Canada, 1979).
Brandon, N.P., Mahmood, M.N., Page, P.W. and Roberts, C.A., The direct
electrowinning of gold from dilute cyanide leach liquors,
Hydrometallurgy, 18 (1987), pp. 305-319.
Bratt, G.C. and Gordon, A.R., Research in Chemical and Extraction Metallurgy,
Aus IMM, (1967), p. 197.
Brood, R.J. and Leger, V.E., Zinc, In: Encyclopaedia of Electrochemistry of the
elements, Ed: Bard, A.J., Vol. V, (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1976),
Chapter V-1, pp. 1-67.
Butler, J.A.V., Trans. Faraday Soc., (1924), Vol. 19, pp. 729-733.
Butler, J.A.V., The electrical double layer and electrocapillarity, In: Electrical
Phenomena at Interfaces, Ed: Butler, J.A.V., (MacMillan Co., New York,
1951), pp. 30-74.
Caruso, S.G., The chemistry of cyanide compounds and their behaviour in the
aquatic environment, Carnegie Mellon Inst. of Research, USA., (1975).
Cassel, H.R., U.S. Patent No. 732,706 (1903); and 732,709 (1903).
291
Cathro, K.J., Effects of oxygen in the cyanide process for gold recovery, Aus
IMM Proceedings, 207, (1963), pp. 181-205.
Cathro, K.J. and Walkley, A., The cyanidation of gold, (CSIRO Publication,
Melbourne, Australia, 1961).
Cathro K.J. and Koch, D.F.A., The dissolution of gold in cyanide solutions-An
electrochemical study, Aus IMM, Proceedings, 210, (1964), pp. 111-126.
Chen, C.K., Lung, T.N. and Wan, C.C., A study of the leaching of gold and
silver by acid thioureation, Hydrometallurgy, 5 (1980), pp. 207-212.
Clennell, J.E., The Cyanide Handbook, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1915), 2nd
edition, pp. 10-24.
Cornet, I., Lewis, W.N. and Kappesser, R., Cathodic protection of a rotating
cylinder, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 47 (1969), p. T222.
292
Cornwall, W.G. and Hisshion, R.J., Leaching of telluride concentrates for gold,
silver and tellurium - Emperor process, Trans. Soc. AIME, 260 (1976),
pp. 108-112.
Cotton, F.A. and Wilkinson, G., Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd editiion,
(lnterscience, New York, 1972), p. 1396.
Dadgar, A. and Sanders, B .M., Recovery of gold from Geobrom 3400 leach
solution with ion-exchange resins, EPD Congress '90, Ed: Gaskell, D.R.,
(Anaheim, CA, TMS, 1990), pp. 355-391.
Dadgar, A., Sanders, B.M., McKeown, J.A., Sergent, R.H. and Jacobson, R.H.,
Leaching and recovery of gold from black sand concentrate and
electrochemical regeneration of bromine, In: Advances in Gold and Silver
processing, Proc. Gold Tech. 4, Eds: Fuerstenau, M.C. and Hendrix, J.L.,
Reno, Nevada, Sept. 10-12, 1990, (SME-AIME), pp. 75-89.
Davidson, R.J., Douglas, W.D. and Tumilty, J., Aspects of laboratory and pilot
plant evaluation of CIP with relations to gold recovery, Presented at XIV
Int. Mineral Processing Congress, Toronto, Canada, (Oct. 17-23, 1982),
pp. II.6.1-11.6.9.
293
Davidson, R.J., and Veronese, J. and Nkosi, M.V., The use of activated carbon
for the recovery of gold and silver from gold plant solutions, J. South
African Inst. Min. Met., (May 1979), pp. 281-297.
Davis, A., Kinetic studies on gold extraction in iodide systems, Ph.D thesis,
School of Mines, University of New South Wales, (1991).
Davis, A. and Tran, T., Fundamental aspects of gold on the leaching of gold in
halide media, In: Proc. EDP '92 Congress, Ed: Hager, J. (TMS-AIME,
1992), pp. 99-114.
Davis, A., Tran, T. and Young, D., Solution chemistry of iodide leaching of
gold, Hydrometallurgy, 32, (1993), pp. 143-159.
Deschenes, C., Ritchy, G.M. and Ghali, E., Reduction of gold and silver by
hydrogen from sulphuric thiourea solutions, ibid, (1989), p. 341.
Drozdov, B.V., Conditions for the contact reduction of a metal from solution,
Zh. Prikl. Khim. 31 (1958), p. 211.
Dry, M.J. and Coetzee, C.F.B., The recovery of gold from refractory ores, Gold
100, Proc. Inter. Conf. on Gold, Eds: King, R.P., Fivas, C.E., (SAIMM,
1986), p. 259.
Dupius, C. and Ghali, E., Gold recovery from thiourea solutions by direct
electrowinning, In: Precious Metals '89, Eds: Jha, M.C., Hill, S.D. and El
Guindi, M., TMS-AIME (1989), pp. 359-376.
294
Eisele, J.A., Comparative leaching of gold and silver with cyanide and thiourea
solutions, Precious Metals '89, Ed: Jha, M.C., Hill, S.D. and El Guindi,
M., (TMS-AIME, 1989), p. 253-260.
Eisenberg, M., Tobias, C.W. and Wilke, C.R., Ionic mass transfer and
concentration polarization at rotating electrodes, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
101 (1964), pp. 306-319.
Elsner, L., Uber das Verhalten vers Chiedner metalle in einer wassrigen losung
von zyankalum, Journal fuer Praktische chemie, 37, (1846), pp. 441-446.
Engel, M.D., Leahy, G.J., Moxon, N.T. and Nicol, S.K., Selective ion flotation
of gold from alkaline cyanide solutions, In: World Gold '91, (Aus IMM,
Melbourne), (1991), pp. 121-131.
Erdey-Gruz, T. and Volmer, M., Z Physik. Chem, (1930), Vol. A 150, pp. 203-
213.
Eyring, H. and Eyring, E.M., Modern chemical kinetics, (Reinhold, New York,
1963).
Fagan, R.K., Chlorine based flooded pit leaching of oxide ores, In: Proc. Int.
Conf. Extractive Metallurgy of Gold and Base Metals, Eds: Misra, V.N.,
Halbe, D. and Spottiswood, D.J., Kalgoorlie, Western Australia, Oct 26-
28, 1992, (Aus. IMM).
Falanga, B.J. and MacDonald, D.I., Recovery of gold and/or palladium from an
iodide-iodine etching solution, US. Patent No. 4,319,923 (1982).
Fink, C.G. and Putnam, G.L., Bromine process for Gold Ores, U.S. Patent No.
2,283,198 (1942).
Fink, C.G. and Putnam, G.L., The action of sulphide ion and of metal salts on
the dissolution of gold in cyanide solutions, Trans. Soc. Min. Engrs.,
AIME, Vol. 187, (1950), pp. 952-955.
Finkelstein, N.P., The Chemistry of the Extraction of Gold from its ores, In:
Gold Metallurgy in South Africa, Ed: Adamson, R.J., (Cape & Transvaal
Printers Limited, Cape Town, 1972), pp. 284-351.
Foo, J.R., Bath, M.D., Ismay, A. and Canterford, J.H., New gold processing
technologies: An Engineer's perspective, World Gold '89, Proc. of Joint
Symp. AIME-Aus IMM, Reno, Nevada, (September, 1989), p. 233.
Froning, M.H., Shanley, M.E. and Verink, E.D. Jr., An Improved Method for
Calculation of Potential-pH Diagrams of Metal-Ion-Water Systems by
Computer, Corrosion Science, 16, (1976), pp. 371-377.
Frumkin, A.N. and Tedoradse, G., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 118, 530 (1958); Z.
Electrochem. 62, (1958), p. 251.
Gabe, D.R. and Robinson, DJ., Mass transfer in a rotating cylinder cell - 1,
Electrochim. Acta. 17 (1972), pp. 1121-1129.
Gabra, G., A kinetic study of the leaching of gold from pyrite concentrate using
acidified thiourea, In: PRECIOUS METALS: Mining, Extraction and
Processing, Eds: Kudryk, V., CoITigan, D.A., Liang, W.W. Proc. TMS-
AIME Int. Symp., Los Angeles, California, February, 27-29, 1984, pp.
145-170.
Gilmore, A.J., A proposed use for ion exchange in gold cyanidation, Can. Min.
J., 88 (1967), pp. 63-65.
Gladyshev, P., Enikeev, R.S., Zakharchuk, N.F. and Petrova, L.P., Zh. Prikl.
Khim. 43 (1970), p. 994.
Green, B.R., Schwellnus, A.H. and Kotze, M.H., Recent developments in resins
for the extraction of gold, GOLD 100, Proc. Int. Conf. on Gold, Vol. 2,
S. Afr. Inst. Min. & Metall.(1986), pp. 321-334.
Habashi, F., The theory of cyanidation, Trans. Soc. Engrs, AIME, 235 (1966),
pp. 236-239.
Habashi, F., Kinetics and mechanism of gold and silver dissolution in cyanide
solution, Mont. Bureau. Mines, Geol. Bull. No. 59, (1967).
Halbe, D., Electrowinning cell efficiency, Custom Equipment Corp., Salt Lake
City, Utah, USA. (1984).
Hamdo1f, C.J., Precipitation of lead and silver from brine solutions by metallic
iron, Proc. Aust. Int. Min and Met., 199 (1961), p. 19.
Hartung, R. Cyanide and Nitriles, Patty's Industtial Hygiene and Toxicity, Eds:
Clayton, G.D. and Clayton, F.E., (John Wiley and Son, New York, 1982)
Vol 2C, pp. 4845-4900.
298
Heinen, H.J. and Potter, B., Experimental leaching of gold from mine waste,
Bureau Mines, RI 7250, (1969), p. 5.
Heinen, H.J., Peterson, D.G. and Lindstrom, R.E., Silver extraction from
., Metall. Soc. AIME, New
marginal resources, 104th Annual Meeting,
York, (February 16-20, 1975), p. 14.
Heinen, H.J., Peterson, A.G. and Lindstrom, R.E., Gold desorption from
activated carbon with alkaline alcohol solutions, World Mining and
Metals Technology, Vol. 1, (AIME, New York, 1976), pp. 551-564.
Heinen, H.J., Peterson, D.G. and Lindstrom, R.E., Processing of gold ores using
heap leach-carbon adsorption methods, Bureau Mines RI 8770, (1978), p.
21.
Hirako, M. and Kikinzoku Kogyo, T., The new gold purification process,
Precious Metals News and Review, 14:(7), (1990), pp. 217-223.
Hiskey, J.B., and Atluri, V.P., Dissolution Chemistry of Gold and Silver in
different Lixiviants, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy
Review, Vol. 4, (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers Inc., U.K.,
1988), pp. 95-134.
299
Hiskey, J.B. and Qi, P.H., Leaching and electrochemical behaviour of gold in
iodide solutions, Part I: Dissolution kinetics, AIME Preprint No. 90-112,
Presented at SME Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, USA, (1990).
Hiskey, J.B. and Qi, P.H., Leaching behaviour of gold in iodide solutions,
World Gold '91, (Aus IMM, Melbourne, 1991), pp. 115-120.
Hisshion, R.J. and Waller, C.G., Recovering gold with thiourea, Min Mag.,
(Sept. 1984), pp. 237-243.
Hope, G.A., Ritchie, I.M. and Wajon, J.E., The effect of oxide films on
cementation reactions, Trends in electrochemistry, (Plenum Press),
(1976), p. 341.
Hormick, R.P., Gold reclamation process, US. Patent No. 3,778,252 (1973).
Howarth, J., Dadgar, A., McKeown, J.A., Sanders, B.M. and Sergent, R.H.,
Electrochemical regeneration of bromine in a gold ore leach/recovery
circuit, EPD Congress '91, Ed: Gaskell, D.R., (TMS, New Orleans, LA.,
1991), pp. 709-718.
Hughes, J., Ritchie, I.M. and Singh, P., The silver(l)/copper reaction m
acetonitrile - water mixtures, Aust. J. Chem., 37, (1984), pp. 903-910.
Huiatt, J.L., Kerrigan, J.E., Olson, F.A. and Potter, G.L., Cyanide from mineral
processing, Proc. of Workshop Sponsored by Nat. Sci. Foundation,
USBM & Industry, Salt Lake City, USA, (1983).
Hussey, S.J., Salisburry, H.B. and Potter, G.M., Carbon-in-pulp gold adsorption
from cyanide leach slurries, RI 8368, US. Bureau of Mines, (1979).
Jackman, I. and Sarbutt, K., The recovery of gold from a telluride concentrate,
Proc. Randol Gold Forum Squaw Valley'90, (Randol Int. Ltd., Golden,
CO, USA, 1990), pp. 55-58.
Jha, M.C. and Kramer, M.J., Recovery of gold from arsenical ores, Precious
Metals: Mining, Extraction, and Processing, AIME, New York, (1984),
pp. 337-365.
Jha, M.C., Recovery of gold and silver from cyanide solutions: A comparative
study of various processes, Proc. 1st. Int. Symp. on Precious Metals
Recovery, Reno, Nevada, (1984).
Jolles, Z.E. (Ed.), Bromine and its compounds, (E. Benn, London, 1966), p.
940.
Julian, H.F. and Smart, E., Cyaniding gold and silver ores, 2nd edition, (Charles
Griffin, London, 1921).
Kappesser, R., Comet, I. and Greif, R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 118 (1971), p.
1957.
Kenna, C.C., Ritchie, I.M. and Singh, P., The cementation of gold by iron from
cyanide solutions, Hydrometallurgy, 23 (1990), pp. 263-279.
Kerley, B.J., Recovery of precious metals from difficult ores, US. Patent No.
4,269,622 (May 26, 1981).
Kerley, B.J., Recovery of precious metals from difficult ores. US. Patent No.
4,369,061 (1983).
301
Kolthoff, I.M. and Lingane, J.J., Polarography, 2nd edition, (Interscience, New
York, 1952), Vol. 2.
Latimer, W.M., The Oxidation States of the Elements and their potentials in
Aqueous Solutions, 2nd edition, (Prentice Hall, New York, 1952).
Law, H.H., A new process for making potassium gold cyanide from gold
particles, In: Precious metals '82, Ed: El Guindy, M.I., (Pergamon, 1982)
pp. 169-184.
Leblanc, R., Precipitation of gold from cyanide solution by zinc dust, Can. Min.
J. 63, Parts I, II, III, April, May, June, (1942).
Lee, E.C., Lawson, F. and Han, K.N., Precipitation of cadmium with zinc from
dilute aqueous solutions: I - Under inert atmosphere, Trans. IMM. Vol.
84, (1975), C87-91; II - Under oxygen-containing atmospheres, Trans.
IMM. 84 (1975), pp. Cl49-153.
MacKinnon, D.J. and Ingraham, T.R., Can. Met. Quart. 9 (1970), p. 443.
MacKinnon, D.J., Ingraham, T.R. and Kerby, R., Can. Metall. Quart., 110,
(1971), p. 165.
Marsden, J. and House, I., The Chemistry of Gold Extraction, (Ellis Horwood
Limited, West Sussex, England, 1992).
McArthur, J.S., Forrest, R.W. and Forrest, W., Process of obtaining Gold and
Silver from Ores, British patent No.14, 174 (1887), U.S. Patent No. 403,
202 418, 137 (1889).
McGrew, K.J. and Murphy, J.W., Iodine leach for the dissolution of gold, US.
Patent No. 4,557, 759 (1985).
Miller, J.D. and Beckstead, W., Surface deposit effects in the kinetics of copper
cementation by iron, Trans. TMS/AIME, 4, (1973), p. 1967.
Miller, J.D., Wan, R.Y. and Parga, J.R., Characterization and electrochemical
analysis of gold cementation from alkaline cyanide solution by suspended
zinc particles, Hydrometallurgy, 24 (1990), pp. 373-392.
Moeller, T., Bailer, J.C. (Jnr), Kleinberg, J., Guss, C.O., Castellion, M.E. and
Metz, C., Chemistry with Inorganic Qualitative Analysis, 3rd edition,
(Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, Orlando, Florida, 1989).
Mooiman, M.B. and Miller, J.D., The solvent extraction of gold from
aurocyanide solutions, Proceedings of ISEC '83, Denver, Colorado,
(1983).
Muir, D.M., Recovery of gold from cyanide solutions using activated carbon - a
review, Proc. C.I.P. Technology for the Extraction of Gold Symposia,
No. 32, (Aus IMM, Melbourne), (1982), pp. 7-22
Muir, D.M., Principles of leaching gold with cyanide and alternative reagents,
In: Carbon -In-Pulp and Gold Processing Technology-AMF Workshop
Course 613/89, Eds: Avraamides, J., La Brooy, S.R. and Muir, D.M.,
(Feb. 13-17, 1989).
Muir, D., La Brooy, S. and Cao, C., Recovery of gold from copper-bearing ores,
In: World Gold'89, Proceedings of Joint Symposium AIME-Aus IMM,
Reno, Nevada, (Sept., 1989), p. 365.
305
Murphy, J.W. and Wyo, L., Electrolytic process for the simultaneous deposition
of gold and replenishment of elemental iodine, US. Patent No. 4,734,171
(1988).
Nadkarni, R.M. and Wadsworth, M.E., Kinetic study of copper with iron,
Advances in Extractive Metallurgy, IMM, (1968), pp. 918-941.
Nelson, J.H., MacDougall, J.J., Eaglin, F.G., Freeman, D.W., Nadler, M. and
Hendrix, J.L., Characterization of Carlin-type gold ore by Photoacoustic,
Raman, and EPR Spectroscopy, Applied Spectr., 36, (1982), pp. 574-576.
Nicol, M.J., Schaich, E., Balestrn, P. and Hedegus, H., A modern study of the
kinetics and mechanism of the cementation of gold, J. S. Afri. Inst. Min
& Metall. (Feb. 1979), pp. 191-198.
Nicol, M.J., The anodic behaviour of gold, Gold Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 2, (Part
I) (1980), pp. 46-55; Part IT: Oxidation in alkaline solutions, Vol. 13, No.
7 (1980), pp. 105-111.
Nicol, M.J ., The anodic dissolution of gold, Part I: Oxidation in acidic solutions,
Gold Bulletin 13, (1980), pp. 46-55.
306
Nicol, M.J., Fleming, C.A. and Paul, R.L., The chemistry of gold extraction, In:
The Extractive Metallurgy of Gold, Ed: Stanley, G.G., S. Afr. Inst. Min
& Metall, (1987), pp. 831-905.
Oo, M.T., Study on the recovery of gold from cyanide solutions, MSc. Thesis,
U.N.S.W., School of Mines, Kensington, Australia, (1990).
Oo, M.T. and Tran, T., The effect of lead on the cementation of gold by zinc,
Hydrometallurgy, 26 (1991), pp. 61-74.
Parga, J.R., Wan, R.Y. and Miller, J.D., Zinc dust cementation of gold from
alkaline cyanide solutions - analysis of Merrill-Crowe plant data, Min. &
Met. Proc. 5, (1988), pp. 170-176.
Paul, R.L. and Howarth, D., Cementation of gold onto zinc from concentrated
aurocyanide electrolytes, Proc. of Int. Conf. on Gold, GOLD 100, Ed:
Fivaz, C.E., S. Afr. Inst. Min & Metall., Johannesburg, (1986), Vol. 2,
pp. 157-172.
Paul, R.L., Filmer, A.O. and Nicol, M.J., The recovery of gold from
concentrated aurocyanide solutions, In: Hydrometallurgy, Research,
Development and Plant Practice, Proc. 3rd. Int, Symp. Hydromet. 112th
AIME Meeting, Eds: Osseo-Asare, K. and Miller, J.D., TMS-AIME,
New York, (1983), pp. 689-704.
Pesic, B. and Sergent, R.H., The rotating disc study of gold dissolution with
Geobrom™ 3400, Refractory Gold, Silver and Precious Metals
Processing, TMS-AIME, Anaheim, California, (February 18-22, 1990),
pp.355-391.
Pesic, B. and Sergent, R.H., The rotating disc study of gold dissolution with
bromine, EPD Congress '91, Ed: Gaskell, D.R., Proc. of TMS-AIME
Conference, New Orleans, (February, 18-21, 1991), pp. 613-636.
Pesic, B., The rotating disc study of gold dissolution with sodium bromate, EPD
Congress '92, Ed: Hager, J.P. Proc. of TMS-AIME Conference, (1992), p.
355.
Pesic, B., Smith, B.D. and Sergent, R.H., Dissolution of gold with bromine from
refractory ores preoxidized by pressure oxidation, In: Proc. EPD '92
Congress, Ed: Hager, J., (TMS-AIME, 1992), pp. 223-238.
Pizarro, R.S. and Antonio, The carbon-in-pulp plant of the Mesbate Gold
Operations, Phillippines, Proceedings of Asian Mining '81 Conference,
(1981), pp. 213-220.
Plaksin, I.N. and Kozhukhova, M.A., The solubility of gold and silver m
thiourea, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 31, (1941), pp. 671-674.
308
Plaksin, I.N. and Kozhukhova, M.A., Dissolution of gold and silver in solutions
of thiourea, Sb. Nauchn. Tr. Inst. Tsvetn. Metal 33, (1960), pp. 107-119.
Potter, G.M., Recovery of gold from stripping waste and ore by percolation
cyanide leaching, Bureau Mines, TPR 20, (1969), p. 5.
Power, G.P. and Ritchie, I.M., Metal displacements reactions, Modem aspects
of Electrochemistry, Plenum Press, London, Vol. II, (1975), pp. 119-250.
Puvvada, G. and Tran, T., The cementation of Ag(I) ions from sodium chloride
solutions onto rotating copper and zinc discs, Proc. Int. Conf. Ext.
Metallurgy of Gold and Base Metals, Eds: Misra, V.N., Halbe, D. and
Spottiswood, D.J., Kalgoorlie, WA, Oct. 26-28, (1992), (Aus IMM,
Parkville, Victoria, Australia), pp. 361-367.
Pyper, R.A. and Hendrix, J.L., Extraction of gold from finely disseminated gold
ores by use of acid thiourea solution, Extraction Metallurgy '81, IMM
Symposium, London, Sept. 21-23, (1981), pp. 57-75.
Ranz, W. and Marshall, W., Evaporation from drops, Chem. Eng. Prog., 48
(1952), p. 141.
Reid, K.J., Bereuter, L.W., Mensah-Biney, R.K. and Sergent, R.H., Gold
recovery from bromine solutions using ion exchange resins, In: Precious
and Rare Metals, Eds: Torma, A.E. and Gundiler, I.H., April 6-8, (1988),
Albuquerque, New Mexico, (Elsevier, New York, 1989), pp. 307-316.
Rich, R.L. and Taube, H.J., The Induced exchange of er and Auc4- evidence
for Au(II), J. Phys. Chem., 58, (1954), pp. 6-11.
Robins, R.G. and Stillman, R.W., DIASTAB, Version 4.02 User's Manual,
(1989).
Rose, T.K. and Newman, W.A.C., The Metallurgy of Gold, 7th edition (Charles
Griffin, London, 1937), p. 573.
Ross, J.R., Salisbury, H.B. and Potter, G.M., Pressure stripping of gold from
activated carbon, Annual Conference Soc. Min. Eng. AIME, Chicago,
IL., February 26 -March I, (1973), p. 14.
Sandberg, R.G. and Huiatt, J.L., Recovery of silver, gold and lead from a
complex ore using ferric chloride, thiourea and brine leach solutions, US
Bureau of Mines, RI 9022, (1986).
Schmid, G .M., Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solutions, In: Gold, Eds: Bard,
A.J., Parsons, R., Jordan, K., (Marcel Dekker, 1985), pp. 313-320.
Sehic, 0., An update on the K-Process, Proc. of Randol Perth, Int. Gold
Conference, (October, 1988), pp. 184-186.
Sergent, R.H., The use of brominated hydantoins for gold leaching, Randol
Gold Forum '88, Scottsdale, AZ, (January 23-24, 1988), pp. 167-169.
Sergent, R.H., Dadgar, A., Shin, C.C. and Reid, K.J., A comparison of bromine
and cyanide leaching for refractory gold concentrate, In: Precious and
Rare Metals, Eds: Torma, A.E. and Gundiler, I.H., (April 6-8, 1988),
Albuquerque, New Mexico, (Elsevier, New York, 1989), pp. 149-156.
312
Seymour, D., Ramadorai, G., Traczyk, F. and Hill, D., Rapid oxidation of
refractory gold-bearing ores by intense flash chlorination at Newmont
Gold Co., In: Precious metals '89, Ed: Jha, M.C., Hill, S.D., El Guindi,
M., (TMS-AIME, 1989), p. 165.
Shaeffer, C.A., Process of Extracting Gold and Silver from their Ores, U.S.
Patent No 267, 723 (1882).
Straumanis, M.E. and Fang, C.C., The structure of metal deposits obtained by
electrochemical displacement upon zinc, J. Electrochem. Soc., 98,
(1951), pp. 9-13.
Strickland, P.H. and Lawson, F., Cementation of copper and zinc from dilute
aqueous solutions, Proc. Aus IMM, No. 236, (Dec. 1970), pp. 25-34.
Stiickland, P.H. and Lawson, F., The cementation of metals from dilute aqueous
solution, Proc. Aus IMM, No. 237, (1971), pp. 71-78.
Tarta.ru, S., Dissolution of gold in thiourea solution, Rev. Roum. Chim., 13 (7),
(1968), pp. 891-897.
313
Tran, T., Davis, A. and Song, J. K., Extraction of gold in halide media, In: Proc.
Int. Conf. Extractive Metallurgy of Gold and Base Metals, Eds: Misra,
V.N., Halbe, D. and Spottiswood, D.J., Kalgoorlie, Western Australia,
Oct. 26-28, (1992), (Aus. IMM), pp. 323-327.
Tsa, C.S. and Iofa, Z.A., Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, 131, (1960), p. 137.
Turnbull, A.G., A general computer program for the calculation and plotting of
thermodynamic stability diagrams, Joint AusIMM/UNSW Extractive
Metall. Symp., Sydney, (1977), p. 10.
Urban, M.R., Urban, J. and Lloyd, P.J.D., The adsorption of gold from cyanide
solutions onto constituents of the reef and its role in reducing the
efficiency of the process, Chamber of Mines, South Africa, Project No.
503/67, Research Report No. 32/73, (1973).
Van Leeuwen and Sangster, B., The toxicology of bromide ion, Vol. 18, Issue 3
(1987).
Von Hahn, E.A. and Ingraham, T.R., Kinetics of Pd(II) cementation on copper
sheet in perchlorate solutions, Trans. TMS/AIME, 236, (1966), pp. 1098-
1103.
Von Hahn, E.A. and Ingraham, T .R., Kinetics of silver cementation on copper in
perchloric acid and alkaline cyanide solutions, Trans. TMS/AIME, 239,
(1967),pp. 1895-1905.
Von Hahn, E.A. and Ingraham, T.R., Kinetics of silver cementation on zinc in
alkaline cyanide and perchloride acid solutions, Can. Met. Quart., 7,
(1968), pp. 15-26.
Von Michaelis, H., The prospects for alternative leach reagents, Eng. Min. J.,
(June, 1987), pp. 42-46.
Wagman, D.D., Evans, W.H., Parker, V.B., Schumm, R.H., Halow, I., Bailey,
S.M., Chumey, K.L. and Nuttal, R.L., The NBS tables of Chemical
thermodynamic properties, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference
data Vol. 11, (1982) Supplement No. 2, (Published by the American
Chemical Society and the American Institute of Physics for the National
Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC 20234).
Weast, R.C. (Ed), Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 66th edition, (CRC
Press Inc., 1986).
315
Wilson, H.W., Process for separation and recovery of gold, US. Patent No.
3,778,252, (1973).
Wilson, H.W., Noble metals solvation agents - hydroxyketones and iodine and
iodide, US. Patent No. 3,826,750, (1974).
Woodcock, J.T., Innovations and options in gold metallurgy, Proc. XVI lnt.
Min. Proc. Congress, Ed: Forssberg, E.K.S., (Elsevier, 1988), pp. 115-
131.
Zadra, J.B., A process for the recovery of gold from activated carbon by
leaching and electrolysis, US Bureau Mines RI 4672, (1950), p. 47.
Zadra, J.B., Engel, A.L. and Heinen, H.J., A process for the recovery of gold
and silver from activated carbon by leaching and electrolysis, US Bureau
Mines RI 4843, (1952), p. 32.
Zumberge, J.E. and Sigleo, A.C., Molecular and elemental analysis of the
carbonaceous matter in the gold and uranium-bearing vaal reef carbon
seams, Witwatersrand Sequence, Mineral Sci. Engng., 10 (10), (1978),
pp. 223-245.
APP END ICE S
317
TITLE
CHEMIX CALCULATION OF GOLD BROMIDE CEMENTA TION
IN THE SODIUM BROMIDE-BROMINE SYSTEM
AT VARIABLE ACID CONCENTRATION
SYSTEM
GAS
02 (G)
N2(G)
Br (G)
Br2 (G)
H2 (G)
H Br (G)
Br O (G)
H2 0 (G)
AQUEOUS
H20
Br2
02 (AQ)
0 H <-> (AQ)
H <+> (AQ)
Br <-> (AQ)
Br2 (AQ)
Br3 <-> (AQ)
Br 0 <-> (AQ)
H Br 0 (AQ)
Br 03 <-> (AQ)
H Br 03 (AI)
Br 04 <-> (AQ)
Br5 <-> (AQ))
H Br (AI)
H Br 04 (AI)
Au 03 H3 (AQ))
Au Br2 <-> (AQ)
318
SINGLE
Au [0 H]3
ZnO
Zn [0 H]2
Zn Br2
NaBr
Na OH
AuBr
Au
Zn
UNITS
JOULE
GIBBS
02(G)
0.0
N2(G)
319
0.0
Br(G)
82396.
Br2 (G)
3110.
H2(G)
0.0
H Br (G)
-53450.
Br O (G)
108220.
H2 0 (G)
-228572.
H20
-237129.
Br2
0.0
02 (AQ)
16400.
0 H <-> (AQ)
-157244.
H <+> (AQ)
0.0
Br <-> (AQ)
-103960.
Br2 (AQ)
3930.
Br3 <-> (AQ)
-107050.
Br O <-> (AQ)
-33400.
H Br O (AQ)
-82400.
Br 03 <-> (AQ)
18600.
H Br 03 (AI)
18600.
Br 04 <-> (AQ)
320
118100.
Br5 <-> (AQ)
-103700.
H Br (Al)
-103960.
H Br 04 (Al)
118100.
Au 03 H3 (AQ)
-283370.
Au Br2 <-> (AQ)
-115000.
Au Br4 <-> (AQ)
-167300.
Au 03 <3-> (AQ)
-51800.
H Au 03 <2-> (AQ)
-142200.
H2 Au 03 <-> (AQ)
-218300.
Zn <2+> (AQ)
-147060.
Zn 02 <2-> (AQ)
-384240.
Zn OH <+> (AQ)
-330100.
Zn 03 H3 <-> (AQ)
-694220.
Zn 04 H4 <2-> (AQ)
-858520.
Zn Br <+> (AQ)
-247700.
Zn Br2 (AQ)
-349400.
Zn Br3 <-> (AQ)
-448900
H Zn 02 <-> (AQ)
-457080.
Zn S 04 (AI)
321
-891590.
Na<+> (aq)
-261905.
S 04 <2-> (AQ)
-744530.
H S 04 <-> (AQ)
-755910.
H2 S 04 (aq)
-744530.
Au [0 H]3
-316920.
ZnO
-318300.
Zn [0 H]2
-553810.
ZnBr2
-312130.
NaBr
-348983.
Na OH
-379494.
AuBr
-6669.3
Au
0.0
Zn
0.0
FILE
CPDNBSDAT
CPDNPLDAT
CPDMRLDAT
INSPECIES
GAS
N2(G)
322
AQUEOUS
H20
Br2 (AQ)
Au Br4 <-> (AQ)
H2 S 04 (aq)
SINGLE
Zn
NaBr
Na OH
TEMPERATURE
298.15
PRESSURE
1.
INMOLE
.8
55.52
.0000607
.0000508
.0000005
.0001
1.
.1
try
.3E-81 .8 .6E-46 .lE-64 .99E-01 .74E-23 .55E-91 .29E-01
55.52 .35E-63 .93E-84 .991E-01 .IE-12 .1003 .6E-64 .12E-63 .lE-53 .441E-58
.78E-92 .7E-90 .69E-90 .25E-92. lE-13 .69E-90 .2E-73 .16E-30 .85E-85 .75E-75
.51E-72 .llE-71 .35E-16 .99E-06 .llE-12 .57E-06 .95E-06 .94E-17 .38E-18 .6E-21
.5E-04 .17E-20 .2 .5E-07 .49E-17 .5E-32
0.0 .687E-3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .508E-4 .lE-90
EQUILIBRATE
323
STEP
OUTMOLE
AQUEOUS
02 (AQ)
Br <-> (AQ)
Br2 (AQ)
Au Br4 <-> (AQ)
Au Br2 <-> (AQ)
Br3 <-> (AQ)
H Br (AI)
H BrO (AQ)
Zn <2+> (AQ)
Zn Br <+> (AQ)
VARY
INMOLE STEPSIZE .049968 .00000048 .049992
AQUEOUS
H2 S 04 (AQ)
EQUILIBRATE
step
activity
aqueous
H <+> (AQ)
VARY
INMOLE STEPSIZE .049968 .00000048 .049992
AQUEOUS
H2 S 04 (AQ)
equilibrate
step
outmole
single
Au
Au Br
324
ZnO
Zn
VARY
INMOLE STEPSIZE .049968 .00000048 .049992
AQUEOUS
H2 S 04 (AQ)
equilibrate
325
TITLE
Eh vs pH diagram for Zinc-Bromine-water system
DIAGRAM
AXES
E(AQ)
H E-1 (AQ)
H20
LIGANDS
Br2 (G)
H Br (G)
Br2
Br E (AQ)
Br2 (AQ)
Br3 E (AQ)
Br OE (AQ)
H Br (AQ)
H Br0 (AQ)
Br 03 E (AQ)
Br 04 E (AQ)
Br5 E (AQ)
AREAS
Zn
Zn0
Zn Br2
Zn E-2 (AQ)
Zn Br2 (AQ)
Zn Br E-1 (AQ)
Zn Br3 E (AQ)
Zn [0 H]3 E (AQ)
Zn [0 H]2 (AQ)
Zn [0 H]4 E2 (AQ)
326
LINES
02 (G)
H2(G)
UNITS
JOULES
GIBBSDATA
Br2 (G)
3110.0
H Br (G)
-53450.0
Br2
0.0
Br E (AQ)
-103960.0
Br2 (AQ)
3930.0
Br3 E (AQ)
-107050.0
Br OE (AQ)
-33400.0
H Br (AQ)
-103960.0
H BrO (AQ)
-82400.0
Br 03 E (AQ)
18600.0
Br 04 E (AQ)
118100.0
Br5 E (AQ)
-103700.0
Zn
0.0
ZnO
-318300.0
Zn Br2
-312130.0
327
Zn E-2 (AQ)
-147060.0
Zn Br2 (AQ)
-349400.0
Zn Br E-1 (AQ)
-247700.0
Zn Br3 E (AQ)
-448900.0
Zn [0 H]3 E (AQ)
-694220.0
Zn [0 H]2 (AQ)
-553810.0
Zn [0 H]4 E2 (AQ)
-858520.0
FILE
CPDNBSDAT
CPDNPLDAT
CPDMRLDAT
COMPONENTS
1,1
AXES
ORD INA TES EH
E(AQ)
ABSCISSA PH
H E-1 (AQ)
LIMITS
ORDINATE -2.0 2.0
ABSCISSA 0.0 14.0
TEMPERATURE
298.15
PRESSURE
328
1.
ACTIVITY
1. 1. 1.
1.0 1.0 1.0
10. 10. 10. 10. 10.
10.0E-00 10.0E-00 10.0E-00 10.0E-00 10.0E-00
1.0E-04 1.0E-04 1.0E-04
1.0E-04 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 1.04E-04
1. 1.
AREAS
COORDINATES
OVERLAY
H2O = 0.5 02 (G) + 2 H E-1 (AQ) + 2 E (AQ)
1. 0.21 1. 1.
OVERLAY
0.5 H2 (G) = H E-1 (AQ) + E (AQ)
1. 1. 1.
PLOT
HEWZNB7
PEN 1
MARK LOWER ABSCISSA 6
2. 4. 6. 8. 10. 12.
MARK LOWER ORDINATE 7
-1.5 - 1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
LABEL LOWER ABSCISSA 8
0.0
2. 2
4.4
6. 6
8. 8
10. 10
12. 12
14. 14
329
".P"
"XO 14 .2"
"YO 10 .25"
"T 298.15"
"R 1.98717"
"N ZN-BR-H2O(A)L"
"H ZN-BR-H2O"
"GL"
"M 20 2 .65"
"O ZNBR.PLT"
"Q 1"
II II
".D"
".00"
"H2O -56.675 H2 O"
II II
".HX"
"HOH"
II II
".ZNAY"
"ZN++ -35.15 ZN"
"ZN++ -35.15 ZN"
"ZNOH+ -78.9 ZN OH"
"ZN(OH)2(AQ) -124.94 ZN 02 H2"
"ZNOH2(S) -132.294 ZN 02 H2 (S)"
"ZNBR+ -59.20 ZN BR"
"ZNBR2(AQ) -83.51 ZN BR2"
"ZNBR3- -107.29 ZN BR3"
".BRAY"
"BR -24.85 BR"
"BR- -24.85 BR"
"HBR(AQ) -24.85 BR H"
331
iJA = 0.62nFD2t3y-116ro112cb
where
IL = limiting current, mA
A = cathodic surface area, cm 2
n = number of electrons
F = Faraday's constant, 96,486, coulomb/mole
Cb = concentration of reducing ions, mole
V = kinematic viscosity, cm2/s
0) = rotation speed, (rad/s)l/2
(i)
n = 1,. At pH:2.00, and 1000 rpm, using a diffusion coefficient, D = 81.7x 10-6
cm2/s and kinematic viscosity, v = 0.01 cm 2/s:
Appendix (8-4.2a) Evans diagram for the reduction of 100 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zinc dissolution in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, 1000 rpm
and (a) pH:2.00 (b) pH:3.00.
pH:2.00 pH:3.00
Appendix (8-4.2b) Evans diagram for the reduction of 100 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zinc dissolution in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, 1000 rpm
and (a) pH:4.00 (b) pH:5.00.
pH:4.00 pH:5.00
Appendix (8-4.3) Evans diagram for the reduction for (a) 10 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide ions and (b) 100 mg/I bromide ions and Zinc
dissolution in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:5.00, and 1000 rpm.
The diffusion coefficient of Au(III) bromo complex was calculated using the
Levich's equation (4-3.5):
idA = 0.62nFD213y-116ro112cb
The slope obtained in figure (8-5.1) for pH:5.00, was 6.036xlo-3. The slope is
given by:
and
Thus, using v = 0.01002 crn 2/s for 0.05 M NaBr (Weast, 1986), n = 3, Cb = 100
mg/I= 5.08x 10-4 M:
The cementation reaction rate constant was predicted using equation (4-3.13):
kp = 0.62D2t3y-1t6ro112
where
For the reduction of 100 mg/I Au(III) bromide ions in 0.05 M NaBr solution at
20°C, pH:5.00 and 1000 rpm, the diffusion coefficient calculated (refer
appendix (8-5.1)) is D = 0.l 7x 10-6 cm2/s (ie., D 213 = 3.07x 10-5 cm2/s). Using
kinematic viscosity of 0.01002 cm 2/s for 0.05 M NaBr (Weast, 1986), v- 116 =
2.15372 cm2/s. Hence,
BET Surface Area Report: BET surface area: 0.0340 ± 0.0011 m2/g
Slope: 127.8299 ± 4.151472
Y-Intercept: 0.21704 ± 0.632756
Corr. coefficient: 9.98422E-0l
BET Surface Area Report: BET surface area: 0.0547 ±0.0018 m2/g
Slope: 78.73225 ± 2.62963
Y-Intercept: 0.801644 ± 0.383844
Corr. coefficient 9.98331E-0l
339
BET Surface Area Report: BET surface area: 0.0906 ± 0.0025 m2/g
Slope: 47.50563 ± 1.31887
Y-Intercept: 0.54359 ± 0.198766
Corr. coefficient: 9.98846E-01
340
(1) -106+63 µm
I"\
.. .J ... 1'4, 124 f,(i,(i 14. 1 0. li.ti 1.1 / 1. 2-2 (}. i). ::(! l:I. O!I 57. f,l~lr!P
1:=== ==== ==== ==== ==== '==== ==== =~1·ft ___ 1!~
.~ource = :jaipte Beam lenqth = 2.2 ~~\MGGEl indp
.. Residual- = 3.(,35 'f.l H D[.,.,(,.5JP.
ftFoca; lu,ott, = :/1(1 n Obscurat1or, = 0.04S0 Volu1~ Cone. = ,)J!::,S5'f.!i i1(dilu5I\
ffPr;;sentation = stnd Volume distrib11t ion ISo.S.A •).(17::,,) 5i/cc., · F.
ij I l '
i0Br- --,---
iii
1 1B 100 1888
Particle size (un).
341
(2) -63+45 µm
~
..__.,
I :· 1,
3. ~ \:; ;_ ' ' t:J.
81. 3 ! ":. j, .:.& ;), ; "____ P,
P. ! ' 83.3
l (,i J...i,
1'3.
8.:3. 3 S7. 7! ·3.48
£8. 3 48.61 1.78
o.
;).
7. 78
t,,.:,S
o.on 0[4,.~J ~
(i,(,ft 77,8':i~I~
~ G. 0~--- -"
ll J S8.3 i '3. 56. 1 ''3 '.' i 6..B 0. 5. 24
~ ot)O t). 3'3.'3i SS. ' lS. 4S. ,:; 1~: :? I 5. 24 0. 4. 30 (i. 0H D(3, 2j "
~ 4'32 0. 39. '3 I 4S.O" 7. 37.8 ::i,c:I 4. 30 ,), 3. 5.:. 0. (i~ b'+, E,4~111~
o. 332 '3'3.81 37.8 3!. 0 1.61 3.53 J. 2.50 0.0~- ---ff
It 404 "· -,;::: C
0. 71 2.50 (1, 2.38 o.o~ D[v,0.'3J"
0. 272 '3'3. 7! 31.0 1.
ff
~
332
272 (J, 224 '3'3. 31 25.5 0.
.:....;. J
20. 3• 0.31 2.38 1.35 o.o, 121:22u1!
,. u. .,.1 1
i. '35
0.21 (l,
l:~~ ~:~.~; D[!,9~1]
~
01 : l i !l I I I Ii I I Q
.1 1 10 108 1008
Particl e size (m:1).
342
(3) -45 +3 8 µm
n1:~0d~i in,:w ,.
Sou rce = :Saroie Beam len gth == 1.2.2 SSS ,:! ft LJ[ '.J, (J. 5j ff
Resid1ial ~);.p32 0,:g 40; S4uer.
ff
= ~00 n Qb? cur atio n = ~t.fl623 !~oiut~ Coi:u.,c:17tlo 1.:/cc. H I!p
"fo cal lepgth stnd S.r-1
ij1-·resentat1on = vo1u11e d1striou.1on l~o. !
11
i
i
i: 58~
f
!n
l I ! I I I II I t)
0' I I I I I 111
108 1808
i 10
.1
Particle size (un).
343
Cementation log([Au]t/[Au]o)
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0
Cementation log([Au1t/[Au] 0 )
time, (ruins)
0 0 0 0 0
Appendix (9-3.3) Variation of log([Au]tf[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for (i) 10 mg/I
(ii) 20 mg/I (iii) 50 mg/I (iv) 100 mg/I Au(ID) bromide/Zn
cementation in 0.10 M NaBr at 20°C, pH:5.00; and 1000
rpm.
Cementation log([Au1t/[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0
Cementation log([Au]tf[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
Appendix (9-3.4b) Variation of log([Au]t/[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for 100 mg/I
Au(ID) bromide/Zn cementation in (i) 0.01 M (ii) 0.05 M (iii)
0.10 M (iv) 0.50 M NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); at 20°C;
pH:5.00; and 1000 rpm.
Cementation log([Au]tf[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0
Cementatio log([Au]tf[Au] 0 )
n time,
(ruins)
0 0 0 0 0 0
L__ l •.•
..::,,
- ·=· .- . . -. ,- ·.. ,:.,,;,(~.
_-
'
I •
~
,,
.;
,,
i\
''
!• 1;
,, l[
I 1(
,,r II
i-l
'I
;-I
"!'-
I "ji Li ' :I·!\ (i
I I
Il
!i fa
' II ,.
1 I I } ;
I! ,1
I,-; I
; ill
I
I
i; ._...._,~-
'~'------
..-. ,-.I_;
.-,--::-11}
---~----. _, __ _
-=-~ '· ..
--, - . - ! : • .::
: !,,~·r,i 1 .. 1::0:,-,c:-,
11 ,...._1 I,
1 .~ Cul<a1+2
C HJ .000 x: 2theta y :
4-0831 • Zn Zinc s~n
4 ~/:.J~ 1 ::1.., {.';, ;:·
350
0 0 0 0
Appendix (9-4.lb) Variation of log([Au1t/[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for 100 mg/I
Au(ill) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); at 20°C; pH:5.00; 500 rpm.
and (i) 38X45 µm (ii) 45X63 µm (iii) 63Xl06 µm zinc
particle size ranges.
0 0 0 0
Appendix (9-4.2) Variation of log([Au]i/[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for 100 mg/I
Au(ID) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); 20°C; pH:5.00; and SOO
rpm at different zinc amounts.
Cementation log([Au]tf[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0
20 -1.222 -2.301 - -
353
Appendix (9-4.3) Variation of log([Au]tf[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for 100 mg/I
Au(ID) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); 20°C; pH:5.00; at (i) 100
(ii) 300 (iii) 500 (iv) 700 rpm.
Cementation log([Au]tl[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0
Cementation log{(Au]tf[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0
Appendix (9-4.4b) Variation of log([Au]tf[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for 100 mg/I
Au(ID) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); at pH:S.00; SOO rpm and
(i) 10°c (ii) 20°c (iii) 30°c (iv) 40°c.
Cementation log([Au]tf[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0
Appendix (9-4.5) Variation of log([Au]tf[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for (i) 10 mg/I
(ii) 20 mg/I (iii) 50 mg/I (iii) 100 mg/I Au(ID) bromide/Zn
(suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M NaBr at
pH:5.00;and 500 rpm.
Cementation log([Au]1/[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0
Cementation log([Au]tf[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
Appendix (9-4.6b) Variation of log([Ault/[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for 100 mg/I
Au(III) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in (i)
0.01 M (ii) 0.05 M (iii) 0.10 M (iv) 0.20 M (v) 0.50 M NaBr
(Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); at 20°C; pH:S.00; and SOO rpm.
Cementation log([Ault/[Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
Appendix (9-4.9) Variation of log([Au]tf[Au] 0 ) ratio with time for 100 mg/I
Au(ID) bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in
0.10 M NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); at 20°C, 500 rpm and (i)
pH:2.00 (ii) pH:3.00 (iii) 4.00 (iv) pH:5.00 (v) pH:7.00
Cementation log([Au]i/(Au] 0 )
time, (mins)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Appendix (9-4.l0b) Variation of 1-(r/r0 ) 3 with time for 100 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M
NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); at 20°C; pH:5.00; 500 rpm. and (i)
38X45 µm (ii) 45X63 µm (iii) 63X106 µm zinc particle size
ranges.
0 0 0 0
20 - 3.06 1.34
365
Appendix (9-4.llb) Variation of 1-(2/3)a-(1-a)213 with time for 100 mg/I Au(ID)
bromide/Zn (suspended particles) cementation in 0.10 M
NaBr (Br2 (aq): 98 mg/I); at 20°C; pH:5.00; 500 rpm. and (i)
38X45 µm (ii) 45X63 µm (iii) 63x106 µm zinc particle size
ranges.
0 0 0 0