Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MIM02 Structures - Revposttamb
MIM02 Structures - Revposttamb
1
1. Finance and the economy
1200
400
200
0
1980 1990 2000 2010 2015
Source: Byrne-Davis (2003) and elaborations on OECD
2
2. Financial structure by sector
3
Net financial account by sector as % of GDP, G7 average
-50
• After the GFC,
- re-accumulation of
-100 households
- stagnation of firms
-150
Hou Corp Govt. Fin.
4
3. Financial structure by instruments
100%
8.7 • Developed countries
90% 16.2
display a rather
12.9 18.0
80% balanced structure by
instruments.
70% 11.8 23.0
18.6 • Financial development
60%
has determined a shift
50% 14.0 from monetary and
31.5
19.8 bank instruments to
40%
20.8 market instruments
30% (less liquidity, more
18.7
20%
risk)
32.8
10% 24.2
17.2
0%
1980 2000 2015
5
6
◼ Instruments/sectors: Firms' liabilities (capital structure)
7
Classification of liabilities of firms, G7 average
Bank loans Bonds Equities Other
100%
13.7 16.6 13.5 • Firms diversify their capital
90%
structure across debt/equity,
80% bank/market instruments
70%
44.3 • Financial development has
60% 53.6
shifted capital structures from
50.1
debt to equity, and from bank to
50%
market instruments.
7.7
40%
20% 43.5
25.5 24.9
10%
0%
1980 2010 2015
8
4. International comparisons
"Bank systems" vs. "Market systems"
"Banks" and "Markets" denote two different ways of organizing financial transactions and
creating financial instruments. Do financial systems in different countries differ
along this dimension?
Since the beginning of the XX century, disaggregation of data by countries has shown two
distinct groups according to the relative incidence of "Banks" and "Markets":
−US, UK, Canada, with smaller role of the bank sector and larger share of market
instruments "market systems" ("Anglo-Saxon model")
−Japan, Germany, France, Italy have larger share of the banks sector and bank
instruments "bank systems" ("Continental model")
Is this pattern still relevant today?
− BS vs. MS difference much less marked, only to some extent still present.
− Both types of systems have moved towards market instruments (direct and/or
intermediated) ("Transnational model"),
− This pattern is common to all developed countries. However there are differences of
intensity
9
◼ What determines the bank vs. market structure?
10
◼ How large is the bank sector?
20
10
0
1980 2010 2015
11
◼ Are bank instruments important?
90%
Bank instruments more
80% important in BS than in
70% MS, but general
tendency towards
60% predominant use of
market instruments
50%
("securitization")
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UK-US-CAN JAP-GER-FRA-ITA UK-US-CAN JAP-GER-FRA-ITA
1980 2015
Source: Byrne-Davis (2003) and elaborations on OECD
12
◼ Are bank instruments important for households?
100%
90%
• Households in classic
80% BS hold larger shares
70% of bank instruments
(exp. Japan and
60% Germany)
50% • But growing
similarities (e.g. role of
40% market intermediaries)
30%
20%
10%
0%
UK US CAN JAP GER FRA ITA
13
◼ Are bank instruments important for firms?
0
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Market
14