You are on page 1of 13
| oh hidenba for MBA progam SANDHYA-K PES]202202420 i Forccas Aulonailted to Prop. Rama | Tithoducion to tha ave Faswonan pean a) the au | mace Business’ noo ual is Ln that 3 admibled’ fhe Al | au ahident “to Hic Mose © Bina Administration (MBAD Te awu about that could tbe aged tp "dank Wo wee ideal “eee sry 4 peta: Bie nb ; 2 'eadipns As cele : | Vv Hhe dren fee ‘wind A bos TD ay eee: adn role cing fell untied ay Pepam an HH Tre saegin 1 aed cine | ne Hie ‘tage si is 7 Arn | ago wi oe andl deudec} drive en prous - | Thee alin a Les “a. placate re bly is ins aus bes sis ohn t ee joe aba qclity ef admitted Aef- —— | > Dodta Analysis dund Tater prutadion . ”) | Data + Niuncber % Dbsomadtong = 2492 wt Votable (XY) = Ruvenhage 5) MBA | Dipenderd Wortdbley = Vy = Marks ti i n= Marks of Projechuwk. ya2 Mats a] Boca. th: Pmt fod ect a0 vnion | find aut al ee son | cebuan Woridbla ond auganlen | wauoken ds Ruilt . | BF Case 3 - Distribution Distributions Percent MI 80 70 sh BA 6s 90 70 Ci) 55 so! Quantiles 100.0% maximum 7789, 995% 7713205 975% 7345025 900% 63.691 750% — quariie 6603 500% median 61.135 250% quartile 573175 100% 54.109 25% s2ai325 05% 51.3961 00% minimum 51.24 ‘Summary Statistics Mean 61700103 Std Dev 5.691823 Std Mean 03317638 Upper 95% Mean 62353064 Lower 95% Mean 61.047142 N 292 N Missing ° Marks Communication 50 Quantiles 1000% maximum 995% 97.5% 90.0% 750% 50.0% 250% 100% 25% 05% quartile median quartile 00% minimum ‘Summary Statistics Mean ‘std Dev Std Err Me 85 84535 81.675 Ssssugaa 0092466 18.6946093, ‘osose13s Upper 95% Mean 61.093887 Lower 959% Mean 59.091045, N NN Missing 292 0 Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 BF Case 3 - Distribution Distributions Marks Projectwork ‘Marks. BOCA %0 100 Ed 2 acs aaa | to 0 | I 1% > = ry so J 50 Quantiles Quantiles 100.0% maximum 87 100.0% maximum 96 995% 95535 995% 9042 975% oI 975% 8 90.0% 7 900% % 750% quartile 7375 750% — quartile B 500% — median ° 500% median 625 250% quartile 6 250% quartile 56 100% 9 100% st 25% 52325 25% 50 osx 50 osx 30 0.0% minimum 50 0.0% riimum 50 ‘Summary Statistics Summary Statistics Mean 68523973 Mean 4.465178 std Dev 710532662 Std Dev 99225043, Std Er Mean 04127612 Std Er Mean 05806706 Upper 95% Mean 69336348 Upper 95% Mean 65.612025 Lower 95% Mean 67711557 Lower 95% Mean 63326331 N 292 N 292 N Missing 0 N Missing 0 BF Case 3 - Fit Least Squares Response Percent MBA Whole Model ‘Actual by Predicted Plot 5 a Percent MBA Actual Ba so 55 6S] Percent. MBA Predicted RMSE=3.4329 RSq=0.64 PValue= <.0001 Effect Summary Source Logworth ‘Marks Communication 37.825 ‘0.00000 Marks BOCA 19584 SeEaeeny ‘0.00000 Marks, Projectwork 3096 |) 0.00080 Lack Of Fit Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Ratio LackOrFit 282 33260265 11.7944 1.0401 PureEror 6 «680373 -—«11.3396.Prob> F Total Eror 288 33940643 05483, Max RSq 09927 Residual by Predicted Plot 10 Percent MBA Residual 50 55 6 6 70 6 Percent MBA Predicted Page 1 of 4 | che Mawiffcane deol de than 0:05, 60 this wodel as a techs Healy Boprtpiuant - | D lack of EA Table The Aum 4 voccount to 33 26.026 | wach a Nae nation pom athe mean. | “The won Agpore vuole 2 \49 44 which | xe the cudtemehe muan Of sajora ay Let Mum bers - BF Case 3 - Fit Least Squares Page 2 of 4 Response Percent MBA Whole Model ‘Summary of Fit Rsquare ‘0637101 Rquare Adj 0.63332 Root Mean Square Eror 3.432921 Mean of Response 61.7001 Observations (orSum Wats) 292 Analysis of Variance Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Ratio. Model 3 59585676 1986.19 1685361 Error 28833940643 1178 Prob > F Total — 291 93526319 <.0001* Parameter Estimates Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t{ Intercept 10619943 2258599 824 «-0001* Marks Communication 03725524 0.024583 15.15 < 0001" Marks Projectwork —0.1035174 0.030551 339, Marks. BOCA. 02103403 0021155 997 Effect Tests Sum of Source Nparm DF — Squares F Ratio Prob > F Marks Communication 1. 1-—27066913 2296736 <.0001 Marks Projectwork 111353015 11.4809 0.0008" Marks BOCA 11 MI77176 994250. < 0001" Residual Normal Quantile Plot 10 Percent MBA Residual Normal Quantile | DAumnwany of Te op, thew weit b3.31/: K4 ON ‘oehueen 3 ee ae whith us Rerce iable MBA vith the pendent oe tats 4 Commuenteaton Prsjecrrork, comd Boca: DR kguore Alin sheet one ae | a addih.o' Voalable, “ute ae Ce sxplanatoy baboon dhe dipenden and independ “iy lt ate eS meamred | one ak hance . aes os ma, pudictons . | age ou vai Lt gui, elaine a oh 40 fom Andapendont eisai Vandboles , 2) _Glsmuahons - 942. Fhoalysis of Variance. DT dipeer of prudent a sets rene ne Vastahed ay D Mann square - eS Aours the thirwehe mean O) Square; which ds 1786-19. Y= Pot Bix + Bo he 4 Bs % Y= 18-6199 +0.34ax)+D- as 0: 210% Xa. =? Revidlua) Nowmal Quandie pat | The Vara se behuin the | idenee ‘Utero. thoretore | idan [ee aa Medd dh BF Case 3 - Fit Least Squares Page 3 of 4 Response Percent MBA ‘Marks._Communication Leverage Plot a Percent MBA Leverage Residuals 3 8 8 & so © 7m 0 Marks, Communication Leverage, P«.0001 Marks Projectwork Leverage Plot Percent MBA Leverage Residuals BB 50 © 70 0 Marks, Projectwork Leverage, P=0.0008 BF Case 3 - Fit Least Squares Page 4 of 4 Response Percent MBA. Marks BOCA Leverage Plot so 6) 7800 ‘Marks BOCA Leverage, P<.0001 Durbin-Watson Durbin- Number Watson of Obs. AutoCorralation Prob

You might also like