Professional Documents
Culture Documents
General Linguistics
General Linguistics
2021
Preface
Ahmad Hassan
2
Table of Contents
Topic/page
Introduction 4
General linguistics 7
Linguistic Morphology 28
Pronunciation Issues 40
Linguistics Glossary 58
References 140
3
Introduction
Linguistics is the scientific study of natural language.
Someone who engages in this study is called a linguist.
In general, Linguistics studies language and it is
concerned with human language as a universal and
recognizable part of human behavior and of the human
abilities. Language in general and language in
particular can be studied from different points of view.
The field of linguistics as a whole can be divided into
several subfields according to the point of view that is
adopted as follows:
1. GENERAL LINGUISTICS
2. DESCRIPTIVE LINGUISTICS
4
3. Diachronic (Historical) Linguistics
5. Theoretical Linguistics
6. Applied Linguistics
5
language teaching. It is concerned with both the
general and descriptive branches of the subject.
7. Micro linguistics
8. MACROLINGUISTICS
6
General linguistics
7
patterns that shape each and every language, both in
their current structure (synchrony) and in their
historical developments (diachrony). In other words,
General Linguistics is a discipline that seeks to
formulate general principles of language, whereas
language-specific programs seek to understand an
individual language or language family in and by
themselves. The kinds of principle that are studied in
General Linguistics cover the nature of the language
faculty and the architecture of grammar, the evolution
and history of languages, general patterns in the
acquisition of languages by children and adults, and the
relationship of languages with social and cultural
structures on the one hand, and with patterns in
cognition and the brain on the other hand. However,
the empirical foundation of General Linguistics is
ultimately individual languages and their histories.
Therefore, a general linguist is typically also concerned
with detailed research on individual languages.
Because the large languages of Europe and elsewhere
8
linguists usually study less well-known languages
when they seek to expand their database. An important
part of a general linguist’s research activities should
involve fieldwork on under-researched, and often
endangered, languages world-wide.
9
processes. General linguistics also studies the
relationship between linguistics and semiotics, as well
as the connection between linguistics and physiology
and acoustics.
Language description
10
From the standpoint of sociolinguistics, general
linguistics studies the social functions of language, the
relationship between language and social processes
(the dependence of the form of a language at any given
period on social processes), and the reflection of these
social processes in the social and territorial
differentiation of language and in its structural and
stylistic variation. The relation between language and
society is particularly apparent in the intermediation
between the types of social relationships and the
different forms of language at different stages of social
development (for example, the formation of national
languages during the historical emergence of ethnic
identity).
11
category in its widest sense the linguistician combines
a minute analysis of a language which may be
commands like his native tongue with a detailed study
of comparative linguistics. General linguistics therefore,
while establishing and studying as its chief object all
that is systematic in speech and language, must of
necessity extend the scope of its investigations to the
diachronic phenomena as well.
12
families of languages and reconstructing as far as
possible the mother language of each family, b) to
determine the forces that are permanently and
universally at work in all languages, and to deduce the
general laws to which all specific historical phenomena
can be reduced; and c) to delimit and define itself.
13
similar questions; later I shall treat them at greater
length. The ties between linguistics and the physiology
of sounds are less difficult to untangle. The relation is
unilateral in the sense that the study of languages
exacts clarifications from the science of the physiology
of sounds but furnishes none in return. In any event,
the two disciplines cannot be confused.
14
the task of the linguist is to condemn them and to
dispel them as far as possible. What is both the integral
and concrete object of linguistics? In fact, language is
something acquired and conventional, language should
not take first place but should be subordinated to the
natural instinct. That objection is easily refuted. First,
no one has proved that speech, as it manifests itself
when we speak, is entirely natural, i.e. that our vocal
apparatus was designed for speaking just as our legs
were designed for walking. Linguists are far from
agreement on this point. For instance Whitney, to
whom language is one of several social institutions,
thinks that we use the vocal apparatus as the instrument
of language purely through luck, for the sake of
convenience: men might just as well have chosen
gestures and used visual symbols instead of acoustical
symbols. Doubtless his thesis is too dogmatic;
language is not similar in all respects to other social
institutions. Moreover, Whitney goes too far in saying
that our choice happened to fall on the vocal organs;
the choice was more or less imposed by nature. But on
the essential point the American linguist is right:
language is a convention, and the nature of the sign
15
that is agreed upon does not matter. The question of the
vocal apparatus obviously takes a secondary place in
the problem of speech. One definition of articulated
speech might confirm that conclusion. On the other
hand, Broca discovered that the faculty of speech is
localized in the third left frontal convolution; his
discovery has been used to substantiate the attribution
of a natural quality to speech. But we know that the
same part of the brain is the center of everything that
has to do with speech, including writing. The preceding
statements, together with observations that have been
made in different cases of aphasia resulting from lesion
of the centers of localization, seem to indicate: (1) that
the various disorders of oral speech are bound up in a
hundred ways with those of written speech; and (2) that
what is lost in all cases of aphasia or agraphia is less
the faculty of producing a given sound or writing a
given sign than the ability to evoke by means of an
instrument, regardless of what it is, the signs of a
regular system of speech. The obvious implication is
that beyond the functioning of the various organs there
exists a more general faculty which governs signs and
which would be the linguistic faculty proper. And this
16
brings us to the same conclusion as above. To give
language first place in the study of speech, we can
advance a final argument: the faculty of articulating
words-whether it is natural or not-is exercised only
with the help of the instrument created by collectivity
and provided for its use; therefore, to say that language
gives unity to speech is not fanciful.
Characteristics of language
17
of the use of speaking retains it provided that he
understands the vocal signs that he hears.
18
it would be impossible to provide detailed photographs
of acts of speaking [actes de parole]; the pronunciation
of even the smallest word represents an infinite number
of muscular movements that could be identified and
put into graphic form only with great difficulty. In
language, on the contrary, there is only the sound-
image, and the latter can be translated into a fixed
visual image. For if we disregard the vast number of
movements necessary for the realization of sound-
images in speaking, we see that each sound-image is
nothing more than the sum of a limited number of
elements or phonemes that can in turn be called up by a
corresponding number of written symbols. The very
possibility of putting the things that relate to language
into graphic form allows dictionaries and grammars to
represent it accurately, for language is a storehouse of
sound images, and writing is the tangible form of those
images.
19
Branches and domains:
Like other linguists, a general linguist does not have an
interest in teaching how to speak “correctly” or how to
best express one’ thoughts and feelings. Linguists see
language as an object of scientific study, not as
something they wish to actively change and shape
because of what they happen to like or not like.
General Linguistics is not merely the study of
languages by people who love to learn as many
languages as possible (although a strong interest in and
passion for languages of course helps!). General
linguistics requires a comparative, generalist view.
Each of the 7000 languages found on the planet is of
equal interest to the general linguist, and general
linguists aim to build databases with information on as
many languages as possible. General Linguistics is not
limited to qualitative and interpretative methods but
also makes heavy use of statistics, logic and
mathematics.
21
Descriptive linguistic describes or gives the data to
confirm or refute the theory of particular language
explained generally.
22
(phraseology), and how these combine to form the
meanings of sentences
23
communication. The study of style has traditionally
been the preserve of literary criticism, but since the rise
of linguistics there has been a more systematic attempt
to provide a 'linguistic' foundation for literary effects,
as well as a concern to broaden the scope of enquiry to
include non-literary texts: recipes, car manuals,
sermons, and so forth.
Historical linguistics
25
Linguistics as a science began at the beginning of the
19th century and was diachronic in its orientation. The
essential theoretical assumption of linguists at this time
was that of the sound law which maintains that
(phonological) change is without exception unless this
is prevented by phonotactic environment. Later
analogical change can mask an earlier change and
make it appear irregular by increasing its scope beyond
environments in which it originally applied.
27
Linguistic morphology
Morphology is the study of the structure and form of
words in language or a language, including inflection,
derivation, and the formation of compounds. At the
basic level, words are made of "morphemes." These are
the smallest units of meaning: roots and affixes
(prefixes and suffixes). In fact, native speakers
recognize the morphemes as grammatically significant
or meaningful. For example, "schoolyard" is made of
"school" + "yard", "makes" is made of "make" + a
grammatical suffix "-s", and "unhappiness" is made of
"happy" with a prefix "un-" and a suffix "-ness".
FREE MORPHEME:
BOUND MORPHEME:
29
BASE:
ROOT:
30
left. It cannot be divided further into meaningful parts.
It is the root of the word.
AFFIX:
INFLECTION:
DERIVATION:
31
as using existing words to make new words. The
inflection/derivation difference is increasingly viewed
as shades of gray rather than an absolute boundary.
Derivation is much less regular, and therefore much
less predictable, than inflectional morphology. For
example, we can predict that most English words will
form their plural by adding the affix <-s> or <-es>. But
how we derive nouns from verbs, for example, is less
predictable. Why do we add <-al> to 'refuse', making
'refusal', but '-ment' to 'pay' to make 'payment'? 'Payal'
and 'refusement' are not possible English words. We
have to do more memorizing in learning derivational
morphology than in learning inflectional morphology.
CONTENT MORPHEME:
32
FUNCTION MORPHEME:
SIMPLE WORD:
a word consisting of a single morpheme; a word that
cannot be analyzed into smaller meaningful parts, e.g.
'item', 'five', 'chunk', 'the'.
COMPLEX WORD:
It is a word consisting of a root plus one or more
affixes (e.g. 'items', 'walked', 'dirty').
COMPOUND WORD:
It is a word that is formed from two or more simple or
complex words (e.g. landlord, red-hot, window
cleaner).
33
Ways inflection can be irregular:
Suppletion:
Syntactic marking:
Future of verbs:
34
English derivational morphology
Class(es)
of word
Nature of change
Affix to which Examples
in meaning
affix
applies
Suffix electric/electricity
Adjective Changes to noun
'-ity' obese/obesity
tie/untie,
Prefix Verb Reverses action fasten/unfasten
'un-' Adjective opposite quality clear/unclear,
safe/unsafe
35
're-' write/rewrite
Changes to
adjective;
Suffix print/printable,
Verb means 'can
'-able' drink/drinkable
undergo action of
verb'
37
voiceless consonants other than /t/; and /@d/ occurs
after the alveolar stops /t/ and /d/.
/t/ after other /d/ after other
/@d/ after /t/
voiceless voiced Cs and
and /d/
consonants vowels
Examples:
38
('life', 'shelf', 'leaf') and one final in /v/, which occurs
only when the plural suffix is added: 'live-', 'shelv-',
'leav-'. Notice that not all words that end in /f/ undergo
this change: the plural of the noun 'proof' is not
'prooves'. Dialects differ in how they pluralize words
such as 'roof', 'hoof'; some people say 'roofs' while
others say 'rooves'; some say 'hoofs' and others 'hooves'.
The plural of 'loaf' is 'loaves', but the plural of 'oaf' is
not 'oaves' but 'oafs'. A learner of English has to
memorize which words change from /f/ to /v/ and
which don't.
39
Pronunciation Issues and Phonetics
Elision
40
Gemination
Silent Letters
"Some words in English have silent letters. How can
we know which letters in which words are silent?"
Unfortunately, the best answer to this question is
"Become a professional etymologist!" Etymology is
the study of the origins of words, and the truth is that
this is more a question of etymology than of grammar.
To give an idea of how big an area we are considering
here, according to Kent Jones, Education Committee,
Esperanto Society of Chicago, "More than 60% of
(English) words have silent letters."
41
James Chandler observes "Many people are perhaps
not aware of the astonishing fact that nearly every
letter of the English alphabet is silent in some word."
Here are three reasons why English has so many silent
letters:
Old English was 90% phonemic (words sound the
same as they look). But from the beginning of the 15th
century, we began to borrow words from other
languages. Because grammar and usage rules are
different in other languages, adopted words did not
follow the rules of English pronunciation.
The English language 'borrowed' the Latin alphabet,
and so we have only got 26 letters to represent around
41 different significant sounds. This means that we
must attempt to use combinations of letters to represent
sounds.
In the Middle English Period William Caxton brought
the printing press to England. As time passed,
pronunciation continued to change, but the printing
press preserved the old spelling. That's why today we
have words that end in a silent 'e', or have other silent
letters in the middle, like 'might'. In fact, modern day
English is only 40% phonemic.
42
So are there any rules and can they help us? Axel Wijk
(Regularized English, 1959, Stockholm: Almqvist &
Wiksells) came up with over 100 rules for English
spelling. It is claimed that by using these rules, you can
spell up to 85% of the words in English with 90%
accuracy. But is this really helpful? Basically, no! It
gets so complicated that a much easier approach is to
memorize sight words.
So you can see that unfortunately there is no clear way
to know about all the silent letters in English. But is it a
hopeless case? Well, the best we can do is to offer the
following list of some silent letters:
• Mb at the end of a word (silent b), e.g. comb,
lamb, climb.
• Sc at the beginning of a word followed by 'e' or 'i',
(silent c), e.g. scene, scent, science, scissors
(except for the word 'sceptic' and its derivations!).
• Kn (silent k), e.g. knife, knock, know.
• Mn at the end of a word (silent n), e.g. damn,
autumn, column
• Ps at the beginning of a word (silent p), e.g.
psalm, psychiatry, psychology
• Ght (silent gh), e.g. night, ought, taught
43
• Gn at the beginning of a word (silent g), e.g.
gnome, gnaw, gnu
• Bt (silent b), e.g. debt, doubtful, subtle (but not in
some words, e.g. 'obtain', 'unobtrusive'!)
The letter H is silent in the following situations:
• At the end of word preceded by a vowel, e.g.
cheetah, Sarah, messiah;
• Between two vowels, e.g. annihilate, vehement,
vehicle
• After the letter 'r', e.g. rhyme, rhubarb, rhythm
• After the letters 'ex', e.g. exhausting, exhibition,
exhort.
Homonyms
Homonyms are words which are spelled the same, but
which have different meanings. The word is made up
of two words from Greek. Homo = 'the same' + onymia
= 'name'.
Examples
bear an animal bore a tedious person
bear to carry bore to drill a hole
down at a lower part draft preliminary sketch
down bird's feathers draft a money order
44
Use
The apparent similarities in these words sometimes
causes confusion – particularly to non-native speakers.
Such words may or may not have the same origins.
Strictly speaking, homonyms may be broken down into
two different categories - homographs and
homophones.
Homographs are words which have the same spelling,
but which are pronounced differently:
lead a heavy metal
lead to walk in front
wind air movement
Jargon
Jargon is 'the technical vocabulary of a profession or
group'. The word is used as a form of criticism when
such terms are used unnecessarily for communication
outside a group.
Examples
legal probate, conveyance, intestate
computers download, Megabyte, serial port
engineering sprocket, crankshaft, centrifuge
gardening mulch, perennial, phlox
45
Use
Jargon can be a useful form of communication between
members of the same group. It acts as a 'shorthand'
which eliminates the need for lengthy explanations.
The most important thing about jargon is that it should
only be used when communicating with people in the
same group.
Some items of jargon eventually pass into common use
because they seem to fill a need. Terms such as own-
goal [from football] or repression [from psycho-
analysis] were once jargon.
There is nothing wrong when jargon is used amongst
members of the same group. It often acts as a sort of
'shorthand', which eliminates the need for lengthy
explanations.
For instance, the foreman in a garage does not need to
write on a mechanic's worksheet:
'Please regulate the device which provides a constant
supply of petrol to the inlet manifold of the engine.'
He writes 'Adjust the carbuettor' (carburetor) – or even
'Fix the carb'.
46
However, when you are communicating with people
outside a group, you should use jargon as little as
possible.
The term jargon in its most negative sense describes
the use of technical or obscure terms when addressing
a general audience.
For instance, what follows is a sentence in a letter from
the Inland Revenue. It is addressed to ordinary
members of the public.
• The basis of assessment for Schedule D Case I
and II, other than commencement and cessation, is
what is termed a previous year basis.
This is an example of bad manners and poor
communication. [Would you know what a 'previous
year basis' means?]
Academic study has its own jargon too, depending
upon the subject in question. Terms such as hegemony
(political philosophy) discourse analysis (linguistics)
and objective correlative (literary studies) would not be
recognizable by an everyday reader, though they might
be understood by someone studying the same subject.
47
Whatever the jargon of your own discipline, it should
be used with precision, accuracy, and above all
restraint.
Eric Partridge quotes the following example to
illustrate the difference between a statement in
technical and non-technical form:
• 'Chlorophyll makes food by photosynthesis.'
• 'Green leaves build up food with the aid of light.'
Only use the specialized terms of your subject if you
are quite sure of their meaning. Never use jargon to
show off or 'impress' your reader. It is likely to create
the opposite effect. We should not use a jargon term
where perfectly ordinary terms will be just as effective.
There is not much virtue in using terms such as aerated
beverages instead of fizzy drinks. These simply cause
disruptions in tone and create a weak style.
Here is an example recently spotted:
"Enjoy your free sample of our moisturizing cleansing
bar"
...in other words - our soap.
48
Cliché
Examples
Use
49
That's a fantastic dress! [very nice]
We're in a war situation. [at war]
It's a brilliant novel. [interesting]
She'll get paranoid about it. [become worried]
What a fabulous car! [remarkable]
Stress
50
low pitch except one, then that higher pitch syllable
will be deemed to carry the stress of the word.
Pitch also plays a central role in intonation.
Length
Length seems to play a role in stress. Generally, if one
syllable has a longer length than the others in the word
then it is deemed to be the one carrying stress. Length
is one of the more important determiners of stress.
51
To feel the distinction between voiced and voiceless
sounds is very easy. Place your finger and thumb
lightly on your throat. Say ssssssss to yourself. Then
say zzzzzzz. Repeat these a few times. Then substitute
fffffff and vvvvvvv sounds. You should be able to feel
the vibration of the cords when you say zzzzzz and
vvvvvv, but nothing when you say sssssss and fffffff.
52
Glossary
Applied linguistics
Areas of linguistics
Competence
53
errors, etc. These latter phenomena are entirely within
the domain of performance which refers to the process
of applying one's competence in the act of speaking.
Bear in mind that competence also refers to the ability
to judge if a sentence is grammatically well-formed; it
is an unconscious ability.
Context
Contrast
54
English as minimal pairs such as pin /pɪn/ : bin /bɪn/
show.
Convention
Creativity
Descriptive
Diachronic
55
Displacement
Duality of patterning
Economy
56
Extralinguistic
Figurative
Formalist
General linguistics
Generative
Idealization
Language
58
in a regular order to convey a certain meaning. Apart
from these formal characteristics, definitions of
languages tend to highlight other aspects such as the
fact that language is used regularly by humans and that
it has a powerful social function.
Lay speaker
Level
59
Linguistics
Linguistic determinism
Marked
60
Metaphor
Onomastics
Paradigm
Parameter
61
Performance
Productivity
Psychological reality
62
Reflexiveness
Rhetoric
Root
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
Sign language
Structuralism
Synchronic
Taxonomic
64
Theoretical linguistics
Underlying representation
Unproductive
65
Zero
Zoosemiotics
Affricate
Allophone
Alphabet
Alveolar
Alveolo-palatal
67
Ambi-dental
Articulatory phonetics
Auditory phonetics
Bilabial
Any sound produced using both lips, e.g. [p] oder [m].
Cardinal vowels
68
Consonant
Contrastive
Dental
69
Diphthong
Discrete
Ease of articulation
Fricative
70
voiceless. The equivalent term spirant is sometimes
found.
Glide
Glottal
Homophone
Homorganic
71
Intonation
IPA
Labial
Labio-dental
72
Labio-velar
Leveling
Manner of articulation
Minimal pair
73
Monophthong
Nasal
Natural class
Onomatopoeia
Optional
Oral
organs of speech
Palatal
Phone
75
Phoneme
Phonemics
Phonetic
Phonetics
Phonological
plosive
Pronunciation
77
Prosody
Received Pronunciation
Redundancy
Rhotic
78
Rhythm
Segment
Sibilant
Stop
79
Stress
Structure
Suprasegmental
Syllable
80
Syntagmatic
Tongue
Transcription
Voiced
Voiceless
Morphology
Allomorph
82
Bound
Case
closed class
83
Declension
Definite article
Degree
84
Empty morph
Function word
Inflection
Irregular
85
stem vowel change in Modern English, man : men,
tooth : teeth.
Morph
Morpheme
Morphology
86
Noun
Number
Person
Personal pronoun
87
used to avoid repetition of a name which has already
been mentioned.
Plural
Pronoun
Singular
Stem
88
may change it. It is usually used synonymously with
root.
Suffix
Suppletion
Verb
89
Word class
Word
Zero derivation
Lexicology
90
Base
Citation form
Compound
Conversion
91
Conversion is a common feature of analytical
languages such as English.
Lexeme
Lexical 1
Lexicon
92
radically different in organisation from a conventional
dictionary.
Loan-word
Neologism
Opaque
Thesaurus
93
Transparent
Type
Vocabulary
Syntax
Accusative
Active
95
Adjective
Adverb
Attributive
96
Clause
Concord
Conjugation
97
Constituent
Copula
Declarative
Deep structure
Dependent
Determiner
Direct object
Embedding
Empty word
99
Gender
Generative linguistics
Government
Grammar
100
descriptive phenomenon. It can also be used to refer to
speakers' knowledge of how to produce well-formed
sentences in which case it is an ability, it is speakers'
competence in the generative sense.
Grammatical
Indicative
Indirect object
101
This is a semantic definition. Formally the indirect
object may be an accusative as in German Sie lehrte
ihn eine neue Sprache. In English there is only one
pronominal form for both direct and indirect object, the
latter being indicated by its position before the former
or by a directional preposition like to: She wrote a
letter to her cousin; She gave him the book.
Mood
Negation
Nominative
102
Noun phrase
Oblique case
Open
Parataxis
Part of speech
Participle
103
writing a new book, or to show that an action has been
completed, e.g. with the past participle as in He has
written a new book. Participles can also appear in
attributive form as adjectives, e.g. A crying baby, A
written message.
Passive
Past tense
Perfect
104
express relevance of the action to the present, e.g. I
have spoken to the boss (present perfect).
Phrase
Phrase-structure grammar
Pluperfect
Predicative
105
Preposition
Prepositional phrase
Reflexive
106
Relative pronoun
Sentence
simple
Slot
Subject
107
said, e.g. speaker in the sentence The speaker was
nervous.
Subordination
Surface structure
Syntagm
TMA (tense/mood/aspect)
108
Tree diagram
Transformation [applications]
Word order
Connotation
Denotation
Gradable
Homograph
110
Homonym
Idiom
Lexical meaning
111
Meaning, grammatical
Meaning, lexical
Meaning, sentence
Meaning, utterance
112
Pragmatics
Presupposition
Proposition
Quantifier
113
Semantic field
Semantics
Sense relations
Significant
Speech act
Synonym
Theme
Rheme
Unmarked
115
in this conceptual sense tend indeed to be formally less
marked, i.e. the plural usually involves the addition of
an ending, the genitive has more phonetic substance
than the nominative, etc.
Utterance
Sociolinguistics
Accent 1)
116
Bilingualism
Code switching
Correctness
117
Creole
Dialect
118
Ethnography of communication
Honorific
Hypercorrection
Idiolect
Interference
Langue
Linguistic stigma
Linguistic taboo
120
words lose their strength and become part of general
vocabulary.
Parole
Pidgin
Register
121
the postman one would most likely use a different
register than when one is holding a public address.
Sociolect
Sociolinguistics
Speech community
122
Standard
variety
123
Vernacular
Psycholinguistics
Acquisition
Behaviorism
124
Critical period
First language
Innateness hypothesis
Intuition
125
is used frequently when speakers are asked to judge the
grammaticality of sentences.
Language acquisition
Overextension
Psycholinguistics
126
Applied linguistics
Conversation analysis
Corpus
Dictionary
127
(collocations) and status vis à vis the standard of the
language concerned.
Discourse analysis
Error
Interference
Mistake
128
Second language teaching
Textlinguistics
Language change
Borrowing
129
English loanwords in Modern German yielding so-
called 'cultural borrowings'. Borrowing is one of the
chief means of expanding the vocabulary of a language.
Comparative method
Contact
Convergence
130
dialect is taken to derive from both substrate
interference and language-internal developments.
Drift
Etymological fallacy
Etymology
Family tree
131
alternative to this was the wave model of Johannes
Schmidt (1870).
Family
Genetic classification
Grammaticalisation
Historical linguistics
132
Internal reconstruction
Language change
Language contact
Language death
Law
Lexical diffusion
134
afterwards and is a case of normal change which
affects the entire vocabulary. The lexical diffusion type
of change usually ceases before it can cover all
theoretical instances in a language, e.g. the lowering of
short /u/ in the Early Modern English period which
does not apply to instances before [ʃ] and after a labial
stop: bush, push.
Metonymy
Neogrammarian hypothesis
Palatalisation
135
can be seen in the development of Latin camera to
Modern French chambre.
Reconstruction
Substrate
Superstrate
136
Language typology
Cross-linguistic
Isolating language
Linguistic area
137
Linguistic universals
Polysynthetic
Synthetic
Typology
138
result from morphological principles so that this view
of language structure is just as valid as an historical
consideration. Furthermore, languages which occupy a
geographically delimited area, for instance the Balkans,
may come to share structural properties, irrespective of
historical background or genetic affiliation.
Typological classification
Universal
139
References
Millward, Celia (1996). A Biography of the English Language.
Harcourt Brace. ISBN 0-15-501645-8.
Web Sites:
https://www.uni-due.de/ELE/LinguisticGlossary.html
http://www.rotary-munich.de/2005-2006/theo-vennemann.pdf
http://www.yourdictionary.com/general-
linguistics#H1iiUFQQK4VmkIeX.99
http://www.orbilat.com/General_References/Linguistic_Terms.h
tm
140