Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. The papers of SLP have been arranged as per Order XXI, Rule (3) Yes
(1)(f).
10. If the petition is time barred, application for condonation of delay N/A
mentioning the no. of days of delay, with affidavit and court fee
has been filed.
11. The Annexures referred to in the petition are true copies of the Yes
documents before the court(s) below and are filed in
chronological order as per List of Dates.
12. The annexures referred to in the petition are filed and indexed Yes
separately and not marked collectively.
14. In SLP against the order passed in Second Appeal, copies of the N/A
orders passed by the Trial Court and First Appellate Court have
been filed.
15. The complete listing proforma has been filled in, signed and Yes
included in the paper books.
16. In a petition (PIL) filed under clause (d) of Rule 12(1) Order N/A
XXXVIII, the Petitioner has disclosed:
(a) his full name, complete postal address, e-mail address, phone
number, proof regarding personal identification, occupation
and annual income, PAN number and National Unique
Identity Card number, if any;
18. The statement in terms of the Order XIX Rule 3(1) of Supreme Yes
Court Rules 2013 has been given in the Petition of appeal.
20. In case of appeals under Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the N/A
Petitioner / appellant has moved before the Armed Forces
Tribunal for granting certificate for leave to appeal to the
Supreme Court.
21. All the paper-books to be filed after curing the defects shall be in Yes
order.
I hereby declare that I have personally verified the petition and its
contents and it is in conformity with the Supreme Court Rules 2013. I
certify that the above requirements of this Check List have been
complied with. I further certify that all the documents necessary for the
purpose of hearing of the matter have been filed.
Signature
AoR’s Name Prabodh kumar
AoR Code 2406
Contact No. 9540857139
New Delhi
Date:
Diary No.________/2022
DECLARATION
Signature
(b) Similar pending matter with case details: No similar matter pending
7. Criminal Matter: Yes.
(a) Whether accused/convict has surrendered: X Yes √ No
Filed by
[Prabodh kumar]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VERSUS
WITH
I.A.No.______________of 2022
[AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF LEAVE TO APPEAL
BEFORE THE HON’BLE COURT]
AND
I.A.No.______________of 2022
[AN APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER]
AND
I.A.No.______________of 2022
[AN APPLICATION FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE
THE SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION]
PAPER BOOK
(FOR INDEX PLEASE SEE INSIDE)
VERSUS
BRANCH OFFICER
NEW DELHI.
Dated:
SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES
under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 325, 307 & 302 of
IPC.
Brief facts :
the police registered a case bearing FIR No. 275/2020 for the
aforesaid offences.
charge sheet against the accused petitioner and other persons for
bearing no. 24/2021 in the Ld. Trial Court and the same was
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2883/2021 and the same has
(Crl.) No. 3733/2022 before this Hon’ble court against the order
instructed to review his prayer for bail before for this Hon’ble
court after charges have been framed by the trial court and now
since the charges have been framed by the trial court the
Petitioner seeks this Hon’ble court for his prayer for bail.
The trial court framed charges against the Petitioner along with
other co-accused persons for the offences under section 147, 148,
149, 447, 341, 323, 323/149, 325, 325/149, 307, 307/149, 302,
302/34 of I.P.C..
That after framing of charges the Petitioner moved fresh bail
and the same has been dismissed vide order dated 08.09.2022.
to _______.
_____ to _______.
_______.
bail application.
Versus
TO
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND
HIS COMPANION JUSTICES OF THE HON’BLE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE
PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
appeal against the final judgment and order and final order
2. QUESTIONS OF LAW:
SCC 22]?
D. Was the High Court and trial court justified in ignoring the
No.14239/2022.
5. GROUNDS:
just cause the complainant party filed the FIR first getting
concocted charges.
trial has been at the same stage since so long and will take
hearings and delaying the trial since a long time. The trial
Court.
Supreme Court held that bail is the general rule and putting
fact that the witnesses of the complainant party are all their
versions.
NIL
1. PRAYER:
No.14239/2022;
NIL
DRAWN ON:
FILED ON:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VERSUS
CERTIFICATE
“Certified that Special Leave Petition is confined only to the
pleadings before the High Court, whose order is challenged and
the other documents relied upon in these proceedings. No
additional facts, documents or grounds has been taken therein or
relied upon in the Special Leave Petition. It is further certified
that the copies of the documents/Annexures attached to the
Special Leave Petition are necessary to answer the question of
law raised in the Petition or to make out grounds urged in the
Special Leave Petition for consideration of this Hon’ble Court.
This Certificate is given on the basis of the instructions given by
the Petitioner whose Affidavit is filed in support of the Special
Leave Petition.”
(Prabodh Kumar)
APPENDIX