You are on page 1of 5

4562 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 63, NO.

10, OCTOBER 2015

[25] Kyoto Kagaku Co., “Multipurpose Chest Phantom a maximum of 4.9 dBi gain [9]. Considerable increment in match-
N1“LUNGMAN”Catalogue” [Online]. Available: https://www.kyoto ing bandwidth was achieved in [10] using aperture feed in a shorted
kagaku.com/products/detail03/pdf/ph-1_catalog.pdf. Accessed on: Apr. walled rectangular patch indicating 26% operating band with 2.4–
3, 2015.
[26] A. Zamani, S. A. Rezaeieh, and A. M. Abbosh, “Lung cancer detection 4.9 dBi gain. In some contemporary works of the same group, similar
using frequency-domain microwave imaging,” Electron. Lett., vol. 51, air-substrate geometry was examined as dual-band antennas [11]–[14].
no. 10, pp. 740–741, May 2015. In the present investigation, this shorted walled patch has been com-
[27] S. A. Rezaeieh, K. S. Bialkowski, and A. M. Abbosh, “Three-dimensional bined with a conventional microstrip and re-explored with a twofold
open-ended slot antenna for heart failure detection system employing
differential technique,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 13,
objective: 1) to obtain closely spaced dual resonances causing wide
no. 10, pp. 1753–1756, Jan. 2014. operating bandwidth and 2) to achieve high gain. Here, a simple rect-
angular strip, floating above a metal ground plane, has been conceived
in folded configuration. The design principle has been explained with
supportive results indicating its simplicity and low cost features. A
homemade prototype has been experimentally investigated and some
representative results have been provided indicating 5.7–9.6 dBi gain
over 26% achievable bandwidth.
Wideband High Gain Antenna Realized From Simple
Unloaded Single Patch II. D ESIGN C ONCEPT AND A NTENNA G EOMETRY

Debatosh Guha, Chandreyee Sarkar, Sumitra Dey, We have addressed the scope of widening impedance bandwidth
and Chandrakanta Kumar by realizing two radiating elements crafted from a single metal strip.
Direct feeding of both radiators using a single feed, which is not a very
common approach in stacked design, has been employed here. The
basic scheme is shown in Fig. 1, where Fig. 1(a) represents a probe-
Abstract—A wideband antenna has been conceived and realized from fed square patch with length L and resonating at frequency f0 . A half
a single metallic patch with air as the substrate. The patch has been section of the same patch, shorted at one end, should ideally resonate
strategically folded to achieve dual resonances resulting in S11 ≤ 10 dB at the same frequency f0 and this has been adopted in our design as the
over a wide matching bandwidth. Basic design concept has been dis-
cussed and experimentally verified. As much as 26% bandwidth covering secondary radiating element as shown in Fig. 1(b). Unlike [3]–[5], this
almost the full X-band with about 9.6 dBi peak gain has been experi- design deliberately introduces air as the dielectric, which reduces man-
mentally demonstrated from a 20.3 mm × 13 mm patch folded to realize ufacturing cost and also as demonstrated in [1], enhances the fringing
13 mm × 13 mm footprint. area. Larger fringing area indeed increases the electrical aperture of
Index Terms—High gain antenna, microstrip antenna, wideband the radiating patch and produces higher gain.
antenna. This new geometry looks like a folded patch and is very easy to
shape from a single strip. In this design, we have followed h2 ≈
I. I NTRODUCTION h1 /2, with h1 ≈ 0.05λ0 . The choice of the latter one is based on
our knowledge and industry experience of having moderately thick
A conventional single element microstrip patch, etched on a PTFE air substrate for wide impedance bandwidth [15]. This estimation,
substrate, is capable of providing a bandwidth of 2%–3%, while that based on further optimization using [16], has been turned out to be
using air substrate can be increased up to 9%–10% [1]. Broadband the design value. But the spacing h2 between “C” and “A” is critical
or dual-band operation is conventionally achieved by adding parasitic and happens to be h2 ≤ h1 to sustain vertically polarized electric fields
elements or by introducing slots, perturbations, probe-compensation, underneath “C.”
or employing optimizing techniques [2]; however, those in many cases For wideband operation, we conjectured two offset resonances to
impose some degree of design complications, such as multilayered be obtained—one by “A” bearing height h1 and the other by “C”
enlarged volume with critical alignments [3]–[5] and relative deploy- bearing height h2 . An additional current path would inductively load
ment of floating feed-patch combination [6], [7]. Compared to those, “A” resulting in a resonance around f0 + Δf0 , Δf0 being a small
e.g., [3]–[7], we intend to realize simpler, easy to make, and low-height shift in frequency. But in the upper unit “C,” h2 < h1 and it causes
antenna with considerably high bandwidth-to-volume ratio. Shorted a shift toward the left of f0 , i.e., f0 − Δf0 . Its optimum value is
walled patch employing air substrate was introduced in [8] to reduce found to be h2 ≈ 0.5h1 . This concept has been explored in here to
the antenna size. A multielement version was examined as a wide- realize an antenna operating over X-band. Primary patch, marked as
band antenna with more than 10% bandwidth (S11 < −10 dB) and “A” in Fig. 2, has been designed as per the guideline in [12] to oper-
ate around f0 ≈ 9.5 GHz. The upper patch, marked as “C,” is exactly
Manuscript received February 25, 2015; revised June 07, 2015; accepted July
half of “A” in length and they are shorted by a connecting wall “B”
09, 2015. Date of publication July 16, 2015; date of current version October
02, 2015. This work was supported by the Centre of Advanced Study in Radio (= h2 = 0.8 mm). Here, all the units “A,” “B,” and “C” are of equal
Physics and Electronics, University of Calcutta, India. width as depicted in Fig. 2. A 2-mm thick brass plate measuring
D. Guha, C. Sarkar, and S. Dey are with the Institute of Radio Physics and 50 mm × 50 mm has been used as the ground plane. An SMA probe
Electronics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700009, India (e-mail: dguha@ with 1.25-mm diameter and length = h1 + t is used to feed the lower
ieee.org; chandreyee10@rediffmail.com; dey.sumitra76@gmail.com). patch at the optimally matched location ρ = 5 mm.
C. Kumar is with the Department of Space, Communication Systems Group,
ISRO Satellite Centre, Government of India, Bangalore 560017, India (e-mail:
kumarchk@ieee.org). III. A NTENNA C HARACTERISTICS
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this communication are
available online at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. The antenna characteristics have been initially examined using
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TAP.2015.2456942 simulated results [16]. Fig. 3 shows simulated S11 of the proposed

0018-926X © 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.

Authorized licensed use limited to: Heritage Institute of Technology. Downloaded on April 14,2023 at 07:38:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 63, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2015 4563

Fig. 4. Input resistance and reactance versus frequency. Parameters as in Fig. 3.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams: (a) L × L square patch on air substrate and


(b) proposed folded patch with L × L footprint.

Fig. 5. Simulated portrays of electric fields of folded patch surfaces. (a) First
resonance at 9.1 GHz. (b) Second resonance at 10.5 GHz. Strong field: red
(deep black in gray scale); weak field: blue (faded black in gray scale).

the higher resonance of the folded patch. This observation is fur-


ther confirmed by studying the modal fields in the folded patch as
shown in Fig. 5. Near the first resonance, the upper patch “C” shows
expected distribution concentrating the field near its open edge, where
“A” serves as its ground plane [Fig. 5(a)]. For the higher resonance,
patch “A” takes the lead showing the expected field distribution at the
open edges, while that in the upper patch appears insignificant.

Fig. 2. Folded patch geometry: (a) isometric view and (b) cross-sectional view. IV. P ROTOTYPE AND M EASURED R ESULTS
A homemade prototype, as shown in Fig. 6(a), has been used to
validate the design experimentally. It has been shaped from a 0.15-mm
thin copper strip using laboratory scissor and as such we had to accept
some degree of tolerance. Agilent’s N9926A FieldFox Vector Network
Analyzer has been used to measure the input S11 , depicted in Fig. 6(b).
Very close agreement with the simulated values is revealed. Measured
S11 near the second resonance is found to deviate from the predicted
values, which may be attributed to nonuniform h1 values of handmade
prototype [Fig. 6(a)].
The radiation characteristics, measured in an automated anechoic
chamber, are furnished in Figs. 7 and 8. Simulated data are also incor-
porated for comparison. The measurements have been executed near
Fig. 3. Simulated S11 versus frequency of a folded patch compared with
S11 minima occurring at 8.8 and 10.5 GHz. Fig. 7 shows the same
that due to a conventional square patch. Parameters: L = 13, W = 13, t = obtained at 10.5 GHz caused by lower patch “A.” Very close agreement
0.03, h1 = 1.5, h2 = 0.8, e(= 2t + h2 ) = 0.86, and d = 50 (all dimensions between measurements and simulation is revealed. Some degree of
in mm). asymmetry in E-plane is observed, which is caused by the asymmetric
loading of “A” by “B + C.” But as expected, perfect pattern symmetry
is obtained in H-plane, for both copolarized (CoP) and cross-polarized
geometry indicating 23% matching bandwidth. The dotted curve (XP) fields. H-plane XP radiation is considerably high and is unavoid-
shows a resonance occurring near 9.53 GHz when a conventional able in such perturbed patch geometry. Measured E-plane XP level is
patch, such as “A” alone, is used. It is important to note that the folded sufficiently low, although the simulated value is lower than −30 dB
configuration “A + B + C” results in a considerable change indicat- and as such not visible here. Measured peak gain at 10.5 GHz is found
ing two resonances: one in lower side of 9.53 GHz and the other to be 8.6 dBi.
one being in the higher side. This indeed follows our conjecture as The upper element “C” also radiates in broadside, but with a null
discussed earlier. in E-plane around 40◦ . Its measured and simulated patterns are shown
Simulated impedance curves in Fig. 4 help one to surmise that in Fig. 8. Although its bore sight gain is about 6 dBi, the prominent
the nature of resonance caused by “A” alone is closely repeated in null can be explained using a schematic diagram shown in Fig. 9. An

Authorized licensed use limited to: Heritage Institute of Technology. Downloaded on April 14,2023 at 07:38:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
4564 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 63, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2015

Fig. 6. Realized prototype and measured results. (a) Homemade prototype


showing a folded patch fed by a vertical coaxial probe. (b) S11 versus Fig. 8. Measured and simulated radiation patterns at 8.8 GHz. (a) E-plane (xz-
frequency. Parameters: h2 = 1.0 mm and rest as in Fig. 3. plane). (b) H-plane (yz-plane).

Fig. 9. Instantaneous FF and surface current at resonance in the proposed


geometry.

10.5 GHz (where patch “A” predominates) leaving the pattern abso-
lutely smooth. In Fig. 8(b), the H-plane patterns appear symmetric,
but with high XP radiations. This is an obvious phenomenon for “C”
having insufficient ground plane and asymmetric geometry. Here, high
gain (5.7–9.6 dBi) over 26% matching bandwidth is realized at the cost
of high XP values. Asymmetry in pattern with high cross polarization
may be a concern if it is used as a feed to a reflector antenna or for
a point-to-point communication. However, for mobile systems, these
may not be too serious. Radiation null is a feature of this geometry as
explained in Fig. 9 and could be minimized by accurate finishing of
the prototype.
Variation of peak gain using both measured and simulated values
over the matching bandwidth, as depicted in Fig. 10, appears quite
Fig. 7. Measured and simulated radiation patterns at 10.5 GHz. (a) E-plane
interesting. It attains the maximum value of about 7.6–9.6 dBi around
(xz-plane). (b) H-plane (yz-plane).
the band edges and minimum of 5.7 dBi around 9.1 GHz, i.e., between
two specific resonances. As a result, it is sensitive in terms of sharing
instantaneous view of fringing fields (FFs) and associated surface cur- the resonant fields between the two resonators affecting the electrical
rent are shown in Fig. 9. Here, “FF” represents fringing field. FF1-FF2 aperture and hence the antenna gain.
pair represents fringing-fields under patch “A.” Resulting surface cur- Finally, we are now in a position to compare our proposed antenna
rent in the composite configuration “A + B + C” has been indicated with its earlier variants reported in [9] and [10]. Table I provides a
by dotted line. At that instance, FF3 stands for the FFs under “C.” Now comprehensive view. Configuration#1 [9] is compact in size but with
any one can surmise that FF1 would counter play against FF3 result- small operating bandwidth. Configurations #2 [10] and #3 [present]
ing in a null over around 45◦ , which exactly corroborates the results are comparable in terms of size and impedance bandwidth. But the
in Fig. 8(a). It can also be inferred that FF3 becomes insignificant at present design is much superior in terms of gain values. Over 2–4 dB

Authorized licensed use limited to: Heritage Institute of Technology. Downloaded on April 14,2023 at 07:38:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 63, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2015 4565

Fig. 10. Peak gain versus frequency of the prototype. Parameters as in Fig. 6.
Fig. 12. H-plane radiation patterns based on simulated values for varying LC .
Parameters as in Fig. 3.
TABLE I
P ROPOSED D ESIGN C OMPARED W ITH E ARLIER S TUDIES patterns as in Fig. 7, which is caused by “A” for LC = 0.5LA configu-
BASED ON M EASURED R ESULTS ration. Their H-plane characteristics bearing both CoP and XP patterns
are shown as representative results in Fig. 12. Thus, LC = 0.5LA
turns out to be the primary design requirement for this wideband
design.
It would also be relevant to note that the width of “B” essentially
needs to be equal to that of “C” or “A” to achieve dual-band resonances.
Narrower wall fails in establishing TM10 mode underneath “C.”

VI. C ONCLUSION
The proposed concept, which is demonstrated here in X-band, has
also been examined in lower frequencies indicating similar dual res-
onances over wide-matching bandwidth. However, this configuration
is exclusively suitable for a lower patch with square shape. The only
concern is its H-plane XP level. Minimization of XP fields using
defected or shaped ground plane may be addressed in the future with a
view to improve its radiation properties. This simple low-cost antenna
should find potential applications both in microwave and wireless
domains.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank the reviewers and the Associate
Editor for their useful comments in improving this communication.

R EFERENCES
[1] D. Guha, S. Chattopadhyay, and J. Y. Siddiqui, “Estimation of gain
enhancement replacing PTFE by air substrate in a microstrip patch
antenna,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 92–95,
Jun. 2010.
[2] K. L. Wong, Compact and Broadband Microstrip Antennas. Hoboken,
Fig. 11. S11 characteristics with LC as the parameter of the proposed geome-
NJ, USA: Wiley, 2002.
try. Other parameters as in Fig. 3. [3] M. A. Matin, B. S. Sharif, and C. C. Tsimenidis, “Dual layer stacked rect-
angular microstrip patch antenna for ultra wideband applications,” IET
improvement is observed compared to [9] and [10]. Moreover, the Microw. Antennas Propag., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1192–1196, Dec. 2007.
present antenna is easier to fabricate and immune from any backward [4] S. B. Sharma, “Wideband stacked SSFIP patch antenna for SAR applica-
tions,” Electron. Lett., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 936–937, May 2000.
radiation or leakage through the aperture. [5] S. D. Targonski, R. B. Waterhouse, and D. M. Pozar, “Design of wide-
band aperture stacked patch microstrip antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1245–1251, Sep. 1998.
[6] C. L. Mak, K. M. Luk, and K. F. Lee, “Microstrip line-fed L-strip patch
V. C HOOSING THE L ENGTH OF “C” AND W IDTH OF “B” antenna,” IEE Proc. Microw. Antennas Propag., vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 282–
284, Aug. 1999.
Antenna characteristics for varying LC values have been examined
[7] C. L. Mak, K. M. Luk, K. F. Lee, and Y. L. Chow, “Experimental study of
in Figs. 11 and 12. A small change in LC above or below 0.5LA (i.e., microstrip patch antenna with an L-shaped probe,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
LC = 0.6LA or 0.4LA ) results in a drastic change from dual reso- Propag., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 777–783, May 2000.
nances to single resonance, as revealed from Fig. 11. Further increase [8] S. Pinhas and S. Shtrikman, “Comparison between computed and mea-
or decrease in LC (= 0.8LA or 0.2LA ) firmly establishes the same sured bandwidth of quarter-wave microstrip radiators,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1625–1616, Nov. 1988.
and corroborates the case when single resonator “A” is considered. [9] J. Ollikainen, M. Fischer, and P. Vainikainen, “Thin dual-resonant stacked
It is equally important to note that these single resonances occurring shorted patch antenna for mobile communications,” Electron. Lett.,
for LC = 0.8LA , 0.6LA , 0.4LA , and 0.2LA show similar radiation vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 437–438, Mar. 1999.

Authorized licensed use limited to: Heritage Institute of Technology. Downloaded on April 14,2023 at 07:38:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
4566 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 63, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2015

[10] W. H. Hsu and K. L. Wong, “Broadband aperture-coupled shorted patch A Compact Single Radiator CRLH-Inspired Circularly
antenna,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 306–307, Mar. Polarized Leaky-Wave Antenna Based on
2001.
[11] J. S. Kuo and K. L. Wong, “A dual-frequency L shaped patch antenna,” Substrate-Integrated Waveguide
Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 177–179, Nov. 2000.
[12] J. S. Kuo and K. L. Wong, “Dual-frequency operation of a planar inverted Hanseung Lee, Jun H. Choi, Chung-Tse Michael Wu, and Tatsuo Itoh
L antenna with tapered patch width,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. vol. 28,
no. 2, pp. 126–127, Jan. 2001.
[13] K. L. Wong, “Compact microstrip antennas,” in Compact and Broadband
Microstrip Antennas. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2002, pp. 22–44. Abstract—A circularly polarized (CP) CRLH-inspired leaky-wave
[14] K. L. Wong, “Compact broadband microstrip antennas,” in Compact antenna (LWA) based on substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) and
and Broadband Microstrip Antennas. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2002, microstrip delay line is presented. The unit-cell of the proposed periodic
pp. 45–86. antenna consists of two conventional CRLH SIW cells and two quarter-
[15] D. Guha, Y. Antar, P. Beland, and M. Roper, “A small size, high gain wavelength microstrip lines. The interdigital slots on the CRLH SIW are
printed antenna for wireless base station applications,” Microw. J., vol. 53, rotated at +45◦ and −45◦ with respect to the wave propagation direc-
no. 1, pp. 92–95, Jan. 2010. tion and separated by 90◦ to create circular polarization. Utilizing the
[16] High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS), v12, Ansoft. microstrip line instead of the SIW delay section, the total size of the five
[17] C. A. Balanis, “Microstrip antennas,” in Antenna Theory and Analysis. unit-cell antenna is reduced by 24.4% in comparison to the previous sin-
Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2005, pp. 811–882. gle radiator CP LWA. Furthermore, microstrip lines provide improved
matching for broadside radiation as well as better CP purity. The unit-
cell characteristics are investigated in detail through dispersion and Bloch
impedance analysis. In addition, space harmonic analysis is carried out to
explain the radiation mechanism of the proposed antenna. The proposed
CRLH-inspired SIW CP antenna operates from 4.2 to 4.85 GHz and fre-
quency scans from −25◦ to 26◦ along the elevation angle. Axial ratio is
maintained below 3 dB throughout the operating frequency. The measured
results show good agreement with the simulated results.
Index Terms—Circular polarization, composite right/left handed
(CRLH), leaky-wave antenna (LWA), substrate-integrated waveguide
(SIW).

I. I NTRODUCTION
Leaky-wave antennas (LWAs) have attracted researchers for many
years because of their unique frequency beam scanning capability
and broad operational bandwidth [1]–[7]. Recent birth of metamate-
rial transmission line (TL) concept has even further accelerated the
study of LWAs [8]–[12]. Composite right/left handed (CRLH) TL is a
type of metamaterial TL that can be systematically designed to have
both positive and negative phase velocities that allows the antennas
to steer the beam not only toward endfired direction but also toward
backfired directions. Moreover, a CRLH TL even supports broadside
radiation under the balanced condition. With above-mentioned advan-
tages, microstrip line-based single radiator circularly polarized (CP)
CRLH LWAs have been proposed [13]–[15]. The inherent quadrature
phase relation of a series and a shunt radiation component for a CP
radiation is analyzed in [15]. Such CP LWAs are particularly aimed
for wireless application under dynamic motion, requiring high signal
throughput. For example, satellites use CP antennas since it is difficult
to align the antennas polarization in advance [16]. Likewise, devices
receiving information from the satellites such as GPS are also equipped
with CP antennas [17]. Nowadays, personal mobile devices such as
WiFi modems and RFID systems have also started to use CP signal to
enhance the wireless performance [18]. In general, for wireless devices
Manuscript received June 19, 2014; revised June 11, 2015; accepted June 15,
2015. Date of publication July 15, 2015; date of current version October 02,
2015.
The authors are with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University
of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA, and with
the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse
University, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA, and also with the Department of
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Wayne State University,
Detroit, MI 48202 USA (e-mail: hlee0411@ucla.edu; jhcho100@syr.edu;
ctmwu@wayne.edu; itoh@seas.ucla.edu).
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this communication are
available online at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TAP.2015.2456935

0018-926X © 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.

Authorized licensed use limited to: Heritage Institute of Technology. Downloaded on April 14,2023 at 07:38:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like