Professional Documents
Culture Documents
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Cable insulation materials (CIM) should perform their safety functions throughout their installed life in
Received 17 September 2013 nuclear power plants (NPP). The CIM will be exposed to gamma irradiation at the installed locations.
Received in revised form 27 March 2014 In order to forecast long-term performance of CIM, the short time accelerated testing was carried out.
Accepted 31 March 2014
Due to its good mechanical strength, ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) is widely used as
CIM. Silicone rubber (SiR) is used in high temperature environments, due to its good di-electric proper-
ties/hydrophobicity. The blending of these two polymers may result in the improvement in their specific
properties. This paper analyses the effects of gamma irradiation on the five different compositions (90-
10; 70-30; 50-50; 30-70; 10-90) of SiR-EPDM blends. The blends were exposed to four different doses
(25 Mrad, 100 Mrad, 200 Mrad and 250 Mrad) of gamma irradiation. The electrical and mechanical param-
eters like volume resistivity (VRY), surface resistivity (SRY), tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (EB),
hardness (H) of the virgin and gamma irradiated blends were determined as per ASTM/IEC standards.
The nature of degradation was investigated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The
simultaneous occurrence of cross-linking and chain scission is found to be the mechanism for ageing in
SiR-EPDM blends. The electrical parameters such as volume resistivity and surface resistivity of all the
blends are found to improve for all doses of gamma irradiation. To validate the influence of cross-linking
reaction of the SiR-EPDM blends under a normal as well as in radiation environment, thermal analysis
has been done using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA). The
morphological changes occurred on the surface of the virgin and gamma irradiated SiR-EPDM blends
were investigated through the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The blend C and the EPDM
rich blends (D and E) are found to have the superior performance when compared with SiR rich blends (A
and B). Hence among the three different compositions of EPDM rich blends, suitable blend can be selected
for a particular NPP application.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.03.037
0029-5493/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
D. R., R. V. / Nuclear Engineering and Design 273 (2014) 602–614 603
4. Results
A and B is found to decrease for higher doses of gamma. But they are
higher than their respective virgin values. The decrease in VRY and
4.1. Effect of gamma irradiation on SiR-EPDM blends
SRY for above 25 Mrad may be due to the simultaneous occurrence
of cross-linking and chain scission reaction in them. The SRY of the
Gamma irradiation of polymeric materials may result in (a)
blend C (50:50 composition of SiR-EPDM) and EPDM rich blends D
cross-linking, (b) chain scission and (c) oxidation reaction. The
and E are found to increase for all doses of gamma. This may be due
cross-linking and chain scission reactions may modify the macro-
to the occurrence of the dominant cross-linking reaction in them
molecular chains of the material. The cross-linking corresponds
(due to higher EPDM content). The dominant reactions responsible
to the formation of a covalent link between two adjacent macro-
for electrical changes need to be ascertained through FTIR.
molecules. This results in the formation of a three dimensional
network. The chain scission leads to the scissoning of macro molec-
ular chains. Oxidation leads to both chain scission and cross-linking 4.1.2. Effects on mechanical parameters
which may result in the embrittlement of the CIM. The loss of Fig. 3(a), (b) and (c) depicts the variations in tensile strength,
mechanical integrity may result in the loss of electrical integrity elongation at break and hardness of five different compositions of
(IAEA-TECDOC-932). SiR-EPDM blends for various doses of gamma irradiation.
From Fig. 3(a), the tensile strength (TS) of SiR rich blends A
4.1.1. Effects on electrical parameters and B is found to reduce for all the doses of gamma irradiation
Figs. 1(a) and 2(a) depict the variations in volume resistivity (25 Mrad, 100 Mrad, 200 Mrad and 250 Mrad). This may be due to
and surface resistivity of SiR rich blends A and B for various doses higher cross-linking density and reduced segmental mobility. In
of gamma irradiation. Figs. 1(b) and 2(b) depict the variations in blends A and B, maximum cross-linking occurred during the blend-
volume resistivity and surface resistivity of EPDM rich blends D and ing process itself. Hence when blends A and B are exposed to gamma
E and blend C (having 50:50 composition of SiR-EPDM) for various irradiation, there is a lesser probability of having a cross-link forma-
doses of gamma irradiation. tion. Hence chain scission reaction predominates in it. Hence when
From Fig. 1(a) and 1(b), the volume resistivity (VRY) of all the a small mechanical force is applied on a highly cross-linked CIM
blends is found to increase for all doses of gamma irradiation. The (due to the lesser cross-linking probability), CIM may become brit-
SiR rich blends A and B have higher VRY compared to the blend tle very quickly. Hence the tensile strength of the SiR rich blends (A
C and EPDM rich blends D and E as expected. Though VRY seem and B) was reduced at 25 Mrad and 100 Mrad dose of gamma irra-
to decrease for dose levels of 100 Mrad and above, their values are diation. But at higher doses of gamma (200 Mrad and 250 Mrad),
higher than their respective virgin ones. From Fig. 2(a) and (b), it is tensile strength of the SiR rich blends (A and B) was reduced to
noted that the surface resistivity (SRY) of both the SiR and EPDM zero. In SiR rich blends A and B, severe discolorations were also
rich blends tend to improve for 25 Mrad. The SRY of SiR rich blends observed at 200 Mrad and 250 Mrad. Also they became very brittle.
D. R., R. V. / Nuclear Engineering and Design 273 (2014) 602–614 605
Fig. 2. (a) Variations in surface resistivity of the blends A and B for various doses of
gamma irradiation. (b) Variations in surface resistivity of the blends C, D and E for
various doses of gamma irradiation.
5. Discussion Table 1d
Functional groups formed at 200 Mrad.
Fig. 4. (a) FTIR Spectra for the blend C for 0 Mrad dose of gamma irradiation. (b) FTIR spectra for the blend C for 25 Mrad dose of gamma irradiation. (c) FTIR spectra for the
blend C for 100 Mrad dose of gamma irradiation. (d) FTIR spectra for the blend C for 200 Mrad dose of gamma irradiation. (e) FTIR spectra for the blend C for 250 Mrad dose
of gamma irradiation.
100 Mrad. This is due to the presence of alcohol ( COOH), stretch; The blend C has its highest VRY and SRY values at 250 Mrad. This
free at wave number 3917 cm−1 and 3785 cm−1 with absorbance may due to the presence of acid ( COOH) at 2554 cm−1 with the
values of 18% and 74% respectively (as from Tables 1a–1c). From 3% absorbance.
Tables 1d and 1e, it can be observed that at 200 Mrad and above, The blend C and EPDM rich blends (D and E) have an increased
there is a decrease in alcohol ( OH) free group in blends A and SRY for all doses. This is due to the presence of acid ( COOH) group
B. Except blend E, VRY of all the blends are slightly reduced at at 2500–3300 along with alcohol ( OH) free group. The blend E has
200 Mrad. This may be due to the reduction in alcohol ( OH), the maximum SRY at 100 Mrad. This is due to the occurrence of alco-
stretch, free group content. The drop in VRY of the blends A and hol ( OH), stretch, free group at wave numbers 3752 cm −1 with
B are evident from Fig. 1(a) and (b). The resistivity decreases (those the maximum absorbance 87%. The blend C has the minimum SRY.
values are greater than their virgin) at higher doses. This may be This may be due to the reduced acid ( COOH) stretch, strong group
due to the reduction in the carrier mobility. This is also because content at 2642–2434 cm−1 . The blend E has the maximum SRY at
of the higher cross-linking density (Roberto Benson et al., 1999). 200 Mrad. This is due to the occurrence of alcohol ( OH), stretch,
608 D. R., R. V. / Nuclear Engineering and Design 273 (2014) 602–614
free group at wave numbers 3772 cm−1 with the absorbance 60%. Table 2
Melting and curing/cross-linking temperature of virgin SiR-EPDM blends.
The blend C has the minimum SRY. This may be due to the reduc-
tion in acid ( COOH) stretch, strong group at 2750–2554 cm−1 . The Blend Tm (◦ C) Tcure (◦ C)
blends C and D have their maximum SRY values at 250 Mrad. The A 227–292 –
blend C has the acid ( COOH) group at wave number 2554 cm−1 B 217–279 379
with the absorbance 3. C 149–167 273
D 180–208 263
The tensile strength of the EPDM rich blend E is improved for
E 166–195 260
all doses of gamma radiation due to the cross-linking (dominant
ageing mechanism) (Gordana Markovic Milena et al., 2009; Emilie
Gautriaud et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2003; Manisara Phiriyawirut The hardness of the blends (A, B, C and D) are decreased at
et al., 2008; Chin-Chiuan Kuo et al., 2012). New groups such as C H 25 Mrad. This is due to the absence of C C (aromatic stretch) group
(alkane, bending, strong), Si O Si at 1455 cm−1 have been noticed. in them. The hardness of the blends (A, B, D and E) is increased with
The complete disappearance of Si O Si at 1000–1160 cm−1 for respect to their virgin counterparts at 100 Mrad. But the hardness
blend A at 25 Mrad, 100 Mrad, 200 Mrad indicate that chain scis- of the blend C has been slightly reduced at 100 Mrad. The hard-
sion has the dominating effect which results in the decrease in TS ness of all the blends is increased at 250 Mrad. The presence of C O
of it. The reappearance of the same group at 250 Mrad indicates (carbonyl, stretch, strong) in blend B and the presence of C C (aro-
that cross-linking has also occurred in blend A. The increased cross- matic, stretch, strong) in blends C, D and E are responsible for the
linking density results in reduced segmental mobility leading to increased hardness. The increase in C H alkane (bending, strong)
brittleness of the blend A. It is inferred that TS of the blends C and E and Si O Si content has been noticed in blends A, C and D. The
are improved at 25 Mrad. This is due to the availability of the new increase in CH3 group content for all doses of gamma irradiation has
groups such as C H (alkane, bending, strong) and Si O Si group resulted in the improvement of hydrophobicity of the all blends.
at wave numbers 1458 cm−1 and 1018 cm−1 with absorbance val-
ues of 22% and 19% respectively in blend C. Also the blend C has
5.4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis
larger C C (alkene, stretch, variable) content at 1629 cm−1 with
32% absorbance. The blend E is found to have the new groups such
Fig. 5A1, B1, C1, D1 and E1 are the SEM micrographs of all the
as C H (alkane, bending, strong) and Si O Si group at wave num-
samples of virgin blends for a magnification of 500. Fig. 5A2, B2,
bers 1458 cm−1 and 1083 cm−1 with absorbance values of 9% and
C2, D2 and E2 are the SEM micrographs of all the five blends for a
17% respectively. It is inferred that blend E is found to have its max-
4000 magnification. Fig. 6A1, B1, C1, D1, E1 and A2, B2, C2, D2, E2
imum TS at 100 Mrad. This is due to the availability of the new
are the SEM micrographs of all the blends exposed to 25 Mrad dose
group C C (alkene, asymmetric stretch, strong) at 1949 cm−1 with
of gamma irradiation for a magnification of 500 and 4000 respec-
the absorbance values of 4%. TS of the blend C has been improved,
tively. Fig. 7A1, B1, C1, D1, E1 and A2, B2, C2, D2, E2 are the SEM
due to the increase in C C (alkene, stretch, variable) content at
micrographs of all the blends exposed to 250 Mrad dose of gamma
1627 cm−1 with 32% absorbance. The TS of the blends C and D is
irradiation for a magnification of 500 and 4000 respectively.
also improved due to the availability of new C C (aromatic stretch)
It is inferred from Fig. 5, that the surface of the SiR rich blends
group at 1459 cm−1 and 1406 cm−1 with absorbance values of 19%
(A and B) had some rough corrugations and they have some ball
and 8% respectively.
like micro structures. This may be due to the less miscibility of the
For the higher doses, the appearance of C C (aromatic stretch)
blends. Whereas the surface roughness of the EPDM rich blends (D
has resulted in increase in TS of the blends C, D and E. It is inferred
and E) are found to be less. The good miscibility of the EPDM rich
that TS of the blends C and E are slightly reduced (even then
blends is indicating.
those values are greater their virgin values) at 200 Mrad. It may
It is inferred from Fig. 6, the surface of SiR rich blends (A and
be due to the absence of C C (alkene, stretch, variable), Si O Si
B) is un-even and has rough portions. The surface of blend A and
group in them. But the blend D has been found to have lesser drop
B has cracks. But the surface of blend C (50% SiR and 50% EPDM) is
in TS value. This is due to the presence of C C (alkene, stretch,
smooth. The surface smoothness of EPDM rich blends (D and E) is
variable) and Si O Si groups at 1638 cm−1 1018 cm−1 with 34%
moderate and some voids are noticed in surface of blend D.
and 24% absorbance. The blend C has the maximum TS at 250 Mrad.
The surface of SiR rich blends (A and B) has highly deeper cracks.
This is due to the appearance of the new functional group C C
Also the erosion of the material is noticed for 4000 magnification.
(aromatic stretch) at 1440 cm−1 with the absorbance 21%. The
The surface of blend C (50% SiR and 50% EPDM) has a little amount
EPDM rich blends (D and E) also have the increased TS. This is due
of erosion. The surface smoothness of EPDM rich blends (D and E)
to the appearance of the C C (aromatic stretch) at wave numbers
is reduced due to the formation of some rough portions for 500
1508 cm−1 , 1599 cm and 1600 cm−1 with the absorbance 50%, 60%
magnifications. At 4000 magnification, erosion has been observed
and 45% respectively. It is also inferred that TS of SiR rich blends
in blend D. The compatibility of the blend E is high.
(A and B) are reduced. This is due to the absence of these groups in
them.
The elongation at break (EB) of all the blends is reduced for all 5.5. Thermal analysis
doses of gamma irradiation. This is due to the dominant cross-
linking reaction. This condition is validated by the formation of 5.5.1. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
new groups such as C H alkane (bending, strong), C C aromatic Fig. 8(a)–(c) shows the DSC thermograph of three different com-
stretch, C C alkene (asymmetric stretch, strong) in the band ranges positions of virgin SiR-EPDM blends (A, C and E). The melting and
of (1350–1480) cm−1 , (1400–1600) cm−1 and (1900–2000) cm−1 curing/cross-linking temperatures of the virgin SiR-EPDM blends
respectively. The elongation values of the SiR rich blends (A and B) are given in Table 2.
are found to be lesser than 50% of their absolute elongation value It is inferred from Table 2, the melting temperature range of
for all doses of gamma irradiation. But the EPDM rich blends (D and un-irradiated (virgin) SiR rich blends (A and B) is (227–292) ◦ C and
E) and blend C are found to have better EB (greater than 50% of their (217–279) ◦ C respectively. The blends C, D and E are found to have
absolute elongation) values at 25 Mrad and 100 Mrad. This may be Tm range at (149–167) ◦ C, (180–208) ◦ C and (166–195) ◦ C respec-
due to the increase in C C alkene (stretch, variable) and Si O Si tively. The low melting point of blends C, D and E is due to the
content in them. higher EPDM content.
D. R., R. V. / Nuclear Engineering and Design 273 (2014) 602–614 609
Fig. 6. SEM micrographs of all the samples of Gamma irradiated (25 Mrad) SiR-EPDM
blends – A1, B1, C1, D1 and E1 – 500 magnification; A2, B2, C2, D2 and E2 – 4000
magnification.
Fig. 5. SEM micrographs of all the samples of virgin blends – A1, B1, C1, D1 and E1 The cross-linking occurs in curing process is an exothermic
– 500 magnification; A2, B2, C2, D2 and E2 – 4000 magnification. which results in a positive peak in DSC. The curing point of blend B
is 379 ◦ C, whereas the curing point of the other blends C, D and E lie
at 273 ◦ C, 263 ◦ C and 260 ◦ C. It is noticed that the Tcure of the blends
The cross-links may play some role in enhancing the melting C, D and E are higher than that of the virgin EPDM whose curing
temperature of the blends. The higher melting point range of the point lie between 130–175 ◦ C. The Tcure is totally absent in blend A.
blends A and B suggest that the melting process is being controlled This is due to the higher bonding energy of Si O bond (452 KJ/mol)
by the occurrence of self cross-linking reaction during the blending in SiR. Hence the cross-linking density of blend A is higher. Also this
process. Hence the tensile strength of the virgin blends A and B are may be due to the occurrence of larger amount of self cross-linking
higher than the remaining blends (C, D and E). reaction in it during the blending process itself. This is reflected in
610 D. R., R. V. / Nuclear Engineering and Design 273 (2014) 602–614
375 ◦ C and 359 ◦ C. The blend C is also found to have higher Tcure of
380 ◦ C. Among the five blends blend C is found to have a highest
tensile strength value at 25 Mrad. The tensile strength of the EPDM
rich blends (D and E) is higher than SiR rich blends (A and B). This
may be due to the higher probability of cross-linking.
It is inferred from Fig. 10, Tm of blend A is increased to 309 ◦ C
(which is greater than 25 Mrad case). The Tm values of EPDM rich
blends (D and E) are increased to 261 ◦ C and 280 ◦ C, respectively.
Tcure of the SiR rich blends (A and B) are reduced slightly which
are less than their un-irradiated case. Hence reduction in tensile
strength is noticed at 250 Mrad. This may be due to the lesser
probability of cross-linking. The blend C is found to have highest
Tcure value. Hence tensile strength of the blend C is highest among
the remaining blends. The Tcure of the EPDM rich blends (D and E)
are reduced slightly when compared with 25 Mrad case. Even then
those are greater than virgin ones.
Fig. 7. SEM micrographs of all the samples of gamma irradiated (250 Mrad) SiR-
EPDM blends – A1, B1, C1, D1 and E1 – 500 magnification; A2, B2, C2, D2 and E2 –
5.5.2. Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA)
4000 magnification.
Fig. 11(a)–(c) shows the TGA curves of three different compo-
sitions of SiR/EPDM blends (blend A, C and E) along with their
the tensile strength of virgin blend A (which is the highest among derivative weight (DW) curves.
the five blends). The high peak of melting temperatures suggest the melting
Fig. 9(a)–(c) shows the DSC thermographs of gamma irradiated process is being kinetically arrested by cross-linking, thereby
(25 Mrad) blends A, C and E. Fig. 10 (a)–(c) shows the DSC thermo- resulting in higher melting temperatures. Fig. 12(a)–(c) shows the
graphs of gamma irradiated (250 Mrad) blends A, C and E. TGA curves of three different compositions of gamma irradiated
It is inferred from Fig. 9, the melting temperature (Tm ) of blend A (25 Mrad) SiR/EPDM blends (blend A, C and E) along with their
is reduced to 234 ◦ C. The blend A has the lesser probability of cross- derivative weight (DW) curves
linking. The Tm of the remaining blends (B, C, D and E) are increased Fig. 13(a)–(c) shows the TGA curves of three different composi-
to 290 ◦ C, 368 ◦ C, 229 ◦ C and 229 ◦ C, respectively. This may be due to tions of gamma irradiated (250 Mrad) SiR/EPDM blends (blend A, C
the higher probability of cross-linking reaction in them. The curing and E) along with their derivative weight (DW) curves.
temperature (Tcure ) of SiR rich blends (A and B) is decreased due to The pyrolysis of elastomers characteristics of the virgin and
lesser probability of cross-linking reaction in them. But the EPDM gamma irradiated SiR-EPDM blends (25 Mrad and 250 Mrad) are
rich blends (D and E) are found to have increased Tcure values of given in Tables 3a–3c, respectively.
D. R., R. V. / Nuclear Engineering and Design 273 (2014) 602–614 611
Table 3c
Fig. 9. DSC thermographs of different compositions of gamma irradiated (25 Mrad) Pyrolysis of elastomers (POE) of gamma irradiated SiR-EPDM blends at 250 Mrad.
SiR/EPDM Blends (a) – Blend A, (b) – Blend C, (c) – Blend E.
Blend Ti (◦ C) Tf (◦ C) POE (%)
Fig. 11. TGA thermographs of different compositions of virgin SiR/EPDM Blends (a)
– Blend A, (b) – Blend C, (c) – Blend E. Fig. 12. TGA thermographs of different compositions of gamma irradiated (25 Mrad)
SiR/EPDM Blends (a) – Blend A, (b) – Blend C, (c) – Blend E.
may be due to the occurrence of lower level of self cross-linking
reaction in them during the blending process. linking reaction in them. The probability of cross-link formation in
The drop in initial temperature (Ti ) and rise in final decomposi- blend C and E are increased. This results in moderate cross-link den-
tion temperature (Tf ) is noticed in blend A at 25 Mrad and 250 Mrad. sity (MCLD) values for blend C and E. The blend D has drop in Ti and
The reason for this effect is the higher cross-linking density (HCLD) rise in Tf at 25 Mrad. At 250 Mrad, rise in Ti and fall in Tf is noticed
of blend A. At 25 Mrad both Ti and Tf decreases in blend B. This in blend D. Hence blend D is found to have LCLD. Table 4 gives the
results in moderate cross-linking density (MCLD) in blend B. But maximum degradation temperature virgin and gamma irradiated
at 250 Mrad, drop in Ti and rise in Tf is noticed in blend B. This SiR-EPDM blends (25 Mrad and 250 Mrad).
contributes the HCLD. The maximum degradation temperature (Tmax ) of the un-
The rise in initial temperature (Ti ) is noticed in blend C at irradiated SiR rich blends (A and B) is lesser than un-irradiated
25 Mrad and 250 Mrad. The final decomposition temperature (Tf ) blend C and EPDM rich blends (D and E). With the gamma
remains constant at 25 Mrad and undergoes a slight reduction at irradiation exposure, Tmax of blend B is decreased at 25 Mrad
250 Mrad. Also the blend E is found to have a drop in Ti and rise in and 250 Mrad. This is due to the lesser probability of cross-link
Tf at 25 Mrad and 250 Mrad. This may be due to the dominant cross- formation in it. At 25 Mrad, Tmax of blend C and E is increased.
D. R., R. V. / Nuclear Engineering and Design 273 (2014) 602–614 613
6. Conclusions
A 383.74 383.74 383.94 The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support
B 386.15 381.33 384.94 extended by SSN College of Engineering for carrying out this
C 478.89 482 51 476.49 research work. The authors are also conveying their sincere grat-
D 478.89 478.89 471.67
itude to the Radiological Safety Division, Indira Gandhi Centre for
E 478.89 481.3 480.1
Atomic Research (IGCAR), Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, India for pro-
viding the gamma irradiation facility.
614 D. R., R. V. / Nuclear Engineering and Design 273 (2014) 602–614
References Hosticka, C., Kingsbury, E.P., Bruhin, A.C., 1980. Qualification of cables to IEEE stan-
dards. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 27 (1), 885–889.
Banford, H.M., Fouracre, R.A., 1999. Nuclear technology and ageing. IEEE Electr. Insul. IAEA-TECDOC-932, 1997. Pilot Study on the Management of Ageing of Instrumen-
Mag. 15 (5), 19–27. tation and Control Cables.
Brown, M., 1994. Compounding of ethylene propylene polymers for electrical appli- Kole, S., Tripathy, K., 1994. Morphology and ageing behaviour of silicone-EPDM
cations. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 13 (1), 16–22. blends. J. Mater. Sci. 29, 2451–2455.
Kuo, C.-C., Liu, C.-C., He, S.-C., Chang, J.-T., He, J.-L., 2012. Effects of additional oxygen Phiriyawirut, M., Saenpong, P., Chalermboon, S., Sooksakoolrut, R., Pochanajit, N.,
flow on the optical and electrical properties of ion beam sputtering deposited Vuttikit, L., Thongchai, A., Supaphot, P., 2008. Isotactic poly(propylene)/wood
molybdenum-doped zinc oxide layer. J. Nano-mater. 22, 1–8. sawdust composite: effect of natural weathering. In: Water Immersion, and
Chipara, M.D., Grecu, V.V., Chipara, M.I., Ponta, C., Reyes Romero, J., 1999. On Gamma-Ray Irradiation on Mechanical Properties Macromolecular Symposium,
the Radiation Induced Degradation of NBR-EPDM Rubbers, Nuclear Instru- pp. 159–166.
ments and Methods in physics Research B (NIMB). Elsevier, Netherlands, Raja Prabu, R., Usa, S., Udhyakumar, K., Abdullah Khan, M., Abdul Majeed, S.S.M.,
pp. 444–448. 2007. Electrical insulation characteristics of silicone and EPDM blends. IEEE
Lee, C., Kim, K.-Y., Ryu, B.-H., Lim, K.-J., 2006. Radiation effects of electrical and Trans. Di-electr. Electr. Insul. 14 (5), 1207–1214.
mechanical properties of ␥-ray irradiated LDPE/EVA blends. In: Conference Rajesh Babu, R., Singh, N.K., Naskar, K., 2010. Effect of mixing sequence on perox-
Record of 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation. ide cured polypropylene (PP)/ethylene octene copolymer (EOC) thermoplastic
Deepalaxmi, R., Balaji, M., Rajini, V., 2013. Particle swarm optimization based selec- vulcanizates (TPVs). Part. I. Morphological, mechanical and thermal properties.
tion of optimal polymeric blend. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 20 (3), J. Polym. Res. 17, 657–671.
922–931. Rajini, V., Udayakumar, K., 2009. Degradation in silicone rubber under AC or DC
Du, B.X., Gao, Y., 2009. Gamma-ray irradiation inhibiting surface charge accumula- voltages in radiation environment. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 16 (3),
tion on polyethylene. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 16 (3), 696–701. 834–841.
Ehsani, M., Borsi, H., Gockenbach, E., G.R. Bakhshandeh, I.R., Morshedian, I.J., Rajini, V., Udayakumar, K., 2006. Discrimination of surface tracking patterns of
Abedi, N., 2004. Study of electrical, dynamic mechanical and surface proper- gamma irradiated polymers using fractals. Indian Acad. Sci. 29 (3), 265–270.
ties of silicone-EPDM blends. In: International Conference on Solid Dielectrics, Roberto Benson, S., Moore, E.A., Martinez-pardo, M.E., Zaragoza, D.L., 1999. Effect of
Toilouse, France, pp. 1–4. Gamma Irradiation on Ethylene-Octene Copolymers Produced by Constrained
Gautriaud, E., Keith, T.S., Jennifer, A., Mark, W.S., Duan Li, O., 2007. Effect of steril- Geometry Catalyst, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in physics Research B
ization on the mechanical properties of silicone rubbers. Saint Gobain Perform. (NIMB). Elsevier, Netherlands, pp. 174–180.
Plast., 1–8. Simmons, S., Shah, M., Mackvich, J., Chang, R.J., 1997. Polymeric outdoor insulating
Gordana Markovic Milena, Marinovic-Cincovic, Vojislav Jovanovic, Suzana materials, Part-III – Silicone elastomer consideration. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 13
Samarzija-Jovanovic, Jaroslava Budinski-Simendic, 2009. The effect of gamma (5), 25–32.
irradiation on the ageing of sulfur cured NR/CSM and NBR/CSM rubber Zhang, L.X., He, S.Y., Wei, Q., 2003. Damage effects and mechanisms of proton
blends reinforced by carbon black. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. Serb. 15 (4), irradiation on methyl silicone rubber. In: Proceedings of the 9th International
291–298. Symposium on Materials in a Space Environment, Netherlands, pp. 715–718.