Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
As an important means of adjusting the upper part of the blast furnace, the charging system is an important operation system
for blast furnace production. It directly affects the distribution of burden in the blast furnace, determines the distribution of
gas flow in the blast furnace and the smooth operation of burden, thus directly affecting the "high efficiency, low
consumption, energy saving" production of the blast furnace and the longevity of the blast furnace. But how to know the
distribution of gas flow and the profile of the burden surface in the blast furnace? Blast furnace is a closed reaction vessel
with high temperature and high pressure. In the past, blast furnace operators could only explore the rules through the values
of temperature, pressure, flow and other detection instruments, thus inferring the production and equipment operation
conditions in the blast furnace. With the development of visualization technology of blast furnace in recent years[1], the
application of technologies such as CCD camera, thermal imager and on-line laser burden level detection system on the top
of blast furnace enables blast furnace operators to intuitively monitor the distribution of gas flow in the blast furnace in real
time and obtain the profile of burden level in production in real time, thus guiding the burden distribution operation of blast
furnace and providing an important detection means for upper adjustment.
After years of development, the on-line laser burden surface detection system has been applied to more than a dozen blast
furnaces such as Hanggang, Jigang, Shougang Qiangang, Jingtang, Shagang, Baotou Steel, Handan Steel and Maanshan Steel
[2 - 5]
. Through continuous improvement, great progress has been made and good results have been achieved.
Ansteel Group Chaoyang Steel&Iron Co., Ltd. has only one blast furnace which effective volume is 2600m3. According to
the needs of blast furnace production, a new designed on-line laser detector of burden surface profile was installed on its
No.1 blast furnace on 20th June 2018.
Two laser scanning devices are installed at the relative position of Chaoyang No.1 blast furnace shell in the diameter
direction of the blast furnace, and a special camera is drilled and installed at the position perpendicular to the diameter of the
scanning device. See figure 2 for field installation.
On 8th August, the blast furnace was in stoppage. It was found that the chute angles of the old chute with the same ring were
more than one degree different from the set value, and the chute liner was seriously worn and replaced with a new charging
chute. After replacing the new chute, a maximum chute angle test was carried out and the chute angles of the new chute were
measured and corrected. According to the test results and in combination with the previous blast furnace operation, the new
charging parameters were determined. On 10th August, the charging parameters were as follows: ore stock line 1.6m, coke
stock line 1.3m, ore batch 61 tons, coke batch 13.16 tons, charge matrix C 41.73 402 382 35.72 332 302 123.3, O 41.71.5 403 383 35.72 332 302,
central coke 3.3 cycles, the outer three rings of ore increased charging cycles. At this time, the burden surface profile change
is more obvious than before, W-shaped with edge platform width 1.1 to 1.2m, funnel depth approximately 0.75m, the blast
furnace worked smoothly, average gas utilization rate increased to 44.06%. The scanning results of coke and ore burden
surface profiles are shown in figure 6 and figure 7. Since then, the blast furnace has basically determined to carry out the
charging operation according to the charging parameters and the profile of the burden surface.
C 41.73 39.92 37.82 35.32 32.62 29.72 123 O 41.71.5 403 383 35.72 332 302
(After the chute was replaced) (After the chute was replaced)
Figure 6. Coke burden surface profile Figure 7. Ore burden surface profile
According to the difference of chute angles before and after the chute replacement, the simulation results using burden
distributing simulation program are as shown in figure 8. From the simulation results, the trend of burden surface profile is
basically the same as the scanning results. Thus, it can be seen that after a period of blast furnace production, the chute angles
may change to a certain extent with the actual set value, which will affect the distribution of blast furnace burden surface, and
then affect the distribution of gas flow and blast furnace production. By using the on-line laser burden detector, the problem
of top equipment and the changing of burden distribution can be found in time.
Charging operation during the period of the chute angle encoder failure
At 8: 00 a.m. on 20th August, the blast furnace operators found the abnormal profile of the burden surface in time through the
scanning results of the on-line laser burden surface detector, see figure 9. After that, the inspection found that the chute angle
encoder failed, the actual chute angle was inconsistent with the set angle, and the angle of the outermost ring was smaller by
more than 1.5 degree, and the more the angle toward the furnace center was, the greater the difference. Since only a single
blast furnace in Ansteel Chaoyang Plant produces molten iron for steelmaking, if the blast furnace is shut down, the
production of the whole plant will be affected and certain economic losses will be caused. In order to avoid the influence of
the shutdown, the factory decided to operate the blast furnace by adjusting the charging system and re-exploring the charging
rules. During this process, the blast furnace operator uses the on-line laser detector to scan the burden surface after charging
parameters adjustment. According to the previous experience, the operator obtained the appropriate profile of the burden
surface soon, and by 4th September, the charge matrix was adjusted as follows: C 433 41.52 39.72 37.72 35.42 32.92 123.4,O 431.5 41.53 39.83
37.7 35.4 32.9
2 2 2. The setting value of chute inclination angle increases by 1.3 to 2.9 from the outer ring to the inner than the
original angle, and changes greatly. The obtained burden surface profile is shown in figure 10.
C 41.33 39.62 37.62 35.42 32.72 29.72 123.2 C 433 41.52 39.72 37.72 35.42 32.92 123.4
(Before the encoder failure) (After the encoder failure) (After the charging parameter adjustment)
Figure 9. Coke burden surface profile Figure 10. Coke burden surface profile
CONCLUSIONS
Under the condition of no fixed cross temperature measurement, Chaoyang No.1 blast furnace uses an on-line laser burden
surface detector to obtain the profile in time for guiding the operation of the blast furnace. By adjusting the charging
operation, the profile of the burden surface and the distribution of gas flow have been improved and good production results
have been achieved. The blast furnace is stable, the output is increased, the central coke is reduced, the top temperature is
lowered, the amount of spout water is obviously decreased, the fuel rate and the coke rate are reduced, thus achieving the
purposes of energy conservation, emission reduction, cost reduction and efficiency improvement.
Due to the production of a single blast furnace in the whole process, the operation of Chaoyang No.1 blast furnace is based
on a long-term stable and compliant behavior policy, and unplanned stoppage is avoided as much as possible. In the event of
the failure of the chute angle encoder, the on-line laser detector plays a vital role in guiding the blast furnace burden
adjustment operation.
REFERENCES
1. Zhengkai GAO, Tai GAO, Chinese Metallurgy, The Chinese Society for Metals, Beijing, China, 2013, pp 8.
2. Zhengkai GAO, Tai GAO, Proceedings of 2014 National Ironmaking Production Technology Conference and
Ironmaking Academic Annual Conference (Part I ), The Chinese Society for Metals, Beijing, China, 2014, pp 815.
3. Chuanhui LI, Dianzhi ZHANG, et al., Proceedings of the 16th National Annual Conference on Blast Furnace
Ironmaking, The Chinese Society for Metals, Beijing, China, 2015, pp 896.
4. Xiansen GUO, Fengyu ZHANG, Proceedings of Annual Meeting of Hebei Ironmaking Technology and Academic
Conference, Metallurgy Society of Hebei Province, Hebei, China, 2013, pp 512.
5. Zhengkai GAO, Jianhua DAI, et al., The 8th International Congress on the Science and Technology of Ironmaking-
ICSTI 2018, ICSTI, Vienna, Austria, 2018, Paper ID 214.