1

Intellectual Property Theft

Introduction: Introducing Intellectual Property Theft

Intellectual property theft is defined as the illegal and unauthorized use of someone else’s
intellectual property. This is a crime that involves the unauthorized use, distribution, or
reproduction of someone else’s intellectual property, inter alia patents, trademarks,
copyrights, and trade secrets.

Intellectual property includes inventions, literary works, artistic creations, trademarks, and
other forms of creative expression that are protected by law. With the rise of technology, IP
theft has become more prevalent and easier to commit. In this essay, we will discuss how
technology has impacted IP theft, what we know about the offenders, victims, and the harm
caused by the crime of Intellectual Property Theft. We will further discuss some of the
challenges common to the regulation and prevention of Intellectual Property Theft and the
ways in which it can be prevented. Lastly, we will discuss some of the ways in which we can
best respond to crimes of Intellectual Property Theft.

a. How has technology impacted on this crime?

The advancement of technology has had a great impact on intellectual property theft. It has
made it simpler for persons and organizations to steal and copy intellectual property. With the
advent of digital technology, it is now possible to make exact copies of copyrighted material
without any loss of quality. For instance, digital piracy of music, movies, and software has
become a widespread phenomenon. In the past, the copying of physical media like cassette
tapes and CDs could only be done with a loss in quality. However, with digital media, piracy
is now more efficient and widespread. Moreover, the internet has made it easier for people to
share copyrighted material without the need for physical exchange.

Another way technology has impacted IP theft is through the creation of counterfeit products.
Counterfeit products are defined as fake products that are designed to look like the real thing.
Nigischer et al. posit that with the availability of high-quality 3D printers, it is now possible
to create counterfeit products that are almost identical to the real thing. This has led to an
increase in counterfeit goods, especially in the fashion industry.

In addition, technology has made it easier for hackers to steal trade secrets and other
confidential information from companies. With the use of malware, hackers can gain access
 2

to a company's network and steal valuable information. This can have severe consequences
for the company, including loss of revenue, theft of trade secrets, reputational damage, and
legal action.

Generally, it is important to note that the impact of technology on IP theft has been
significant. Digital technology has made it simpler for persons and organizations to steal and
copy intellectual property, and this has led to an increase in piracy and counterfeit products.
However, there are ways to prevent IP theft, including the use of DRM technology, legal
protections like patents and copyrights, education and awareness, and robust security
measures. By taking these steps, we can protect the interests of creators and owners of
intellectual property and ensure that their creations are not stolen or misused.

b. What do we know about offenders, victims and the harm caused by such
crimes?

This crime can have a significant impact on both the offenders and the victims. The victims
of this offense also suffer immense harm.

Offenders

Offenders of Intellectual Property Theft can be individuals, groups, or even organizations.

They can be anyone who intentionally or unintentionally uses, distributes, or reproduces
someone else’s intellectual property without the proper authorization. Offenders can be
motivated by financial gain, personal satisfaction, or even ignorance of the law.

Individuals who commit Intellectual Property Theft are often seen as opportunistic and
lacking moral values. They are often motivated by the desire to make money or to gain an
advantage over their competitors. They may also be motivated by a sense of entitlement,
believing that the intellectual property they are stealing is not valuable or that they have a
right to use it.

Groups that engage in Intellectual Property Theft are often organized and may have a specific
agenda or purpose. They may be engaged in the production and dissemination of counterfeit
goods or in the sharing of copyrighted materials. These groups can be difficult to identify and
prosecute, as they may operate across multiple jurisdictions and use sophisticated methods to
avoid detection.
 3

According to Brian, organizations can also be offenders of Intellectual Property Theft. 1 He

contends that such organizations may engage in the theft of trade secrets or engage in patent
infringement. For instance, a report by a UK-based IP rights consortium stated that:

“In December 2002, a piece of investigative journalism by The People newspaper

uncovered a Triad operation whereby well-known criminal gangs were flooding
Britain with pirate DVDs of the latest Harry Potter and James Bond blockbusters,
months before their legitimate release for home viewing. The paper’s investigators
found copies of the DVDs as far afield as London, the West Midlands, Manchester,
and Nottingham. They reported that the recruits selling the DVDs included Chinese
illegal immigrants smuggled in by the Snakeheads Triad group, which traffics people
from mainland China.”

In some cases, organizations may have a culture that condones or even encourages
Intellectual Property Theft.

Victims of Intellectual Property Theft

The victims of Intellectual Property Theft can be individuals, small businesses, or large
corporations. They are often the creators and owners of the intellectual property that has been
stolen. The harm caused to victims can be significant, both financially and emotionally.
Individuals who are victims of Intellectual Property Theft may see their creative works used
or distributed without their permission, leading to a loss of income and reputation. Small
businesses may be particularly vulnerable to Intellectual Property Theft, as they may not have
the resources to protect their intellectual property or to pursue legal action against offenders.

Large corporations can also be victims of Intellectual Property Theft. The theft of trade
secrets or patent infringement can lead to significant financial losses and damage to their
reputation. In addition, Intellectual Property Theft can have a broader impact on society, as it
can lead to a reduction in innovation and the creation of new products and services.

Harm caused by Intellectual Property Theft

The injury caused by Intellectual Property Theft can be significant and far-reaching. It can
affect individuals, businesses, and even society as a whole. The following are some of the
ways in which Intellectual Property Theft can cause harm:
1
Yeh, Brian T. Protection of trade secrets: Overview of current law and legislation. Vol. 5. Congressional
Research Service, 2014.
 4

Financial harm

Intellectual Property Theft can cause significant financial harm to victims. It can result in a
loss of revenue, as well as increased costs necessary for the protection and enforcement of
intellectual property rights.

Reputational harm

Intellectual Property Theft can also cause reputational harm to victims. It can damage the
reputation of individuals, small businesses, and large corporations, leading to a loss of trust
among consumers and other stakeholders.

Loss of innovation

Intellectual Property Theft can have a broader impact on society by reducing innovation and
the creation of new products and services. It can discourage individuals and businesses from
investing in research and development, leading to a reduction in the availability of new and
innovative products and services.

Health and safety risks

Intellectual Property Theft can also pose health and safety risks to consumers. For example,
the production and distribution of counterfeit goods can lead to the production and sale of
products that are dangerous or ineffective.

Intellectual Property Theft is a crime that can have significant impacts on offenders, victims,
and society as a whole. Offenders can be individuals, groups, or organizations that engage in
the unauthorized use, distribution, or reproduction of someone else's intellectual property.
Victims of Intellectual Property Theft can be individuals, small businesses, or large
corporations, and the harm caused can be financial, reputational, and even impact innovation
and health and safety risks. It is of great importance for persons and business entities to take
steps to safeguard their intellectual property and for society in entirety to be cognizant of the
import of respecting intellectual property rights. By doing so, we can promote innovation,
creativity, and a fair and just society.

c. What are the challenges for the regulation and prevention of such crimes?

The regulation and prevention of Intellectual Property Theft are complex and challenging
issues that require a multi-faceted approach. While technological advancements have
 5

provided new tools for identifying and prosecuting Intellectual Property Theft, they have also
created new challenges for regulation and prevention. This section will discuss some of the
challenges associated with the regulation and prevention of Intellectual Property Theft.

Globalization and the Internet

One of the main challenges related to the regulation and prevention of Intellectual Property
Theft is the global nature of the internet and the ease with which digital content can be shared
across borders. Intellectual Property Theft is not limited to any particular geographic location,
and offenders can operate from anywhere in the world. This means that any regulatory
measures put in place by individual countries may have limited effectiveness, and
international cooperation is necessary.

Furthermore, the internet has provided new ways for offenders to distribute and profit from
stolen intellectual property. They can use digital platforms and marketplaces to sell
counterfeit goods, share copyrighted material, and distribute pirated software. The anonymity
provided by the internet also makes it difficult to identify offenders and bring them to justice.

Difficulty in Detecting and Proving Intellectual Property Theft

Another challenge in the regulation and prevention of Intellectual Property Theft is the
difficulty in detecting and proving such crimes. In many cases, Intellectual Property Theft
can be difficult to detect, especially in cases of trade secret theft, where the victim may not be
aware of the theft until significant damage has been done. Furthermore, proving Intellectual
Property Theft can also be challenging, especially in cases where the evidence is
circumstantial or where the offender has taken steps to cover their tracks.

Resource Constraints

Another challenge in the regulation and prevention of Intellectual Property Theft is resource
constraints. Enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies may be deficient of resources and
expertise necessary for effective investigation and prosecution of Intellectual Property Theft.

This is especially true for smaller businesses and individuals who may not have the resources
to effectively protect their intellectual property or pursue legal action against offenders.

Lack of International Consensus on Intellectual Property Rights

 6

Another challenge in the regulation and prevention of Intellectual Property Theft is the lack
of international consensus on intellectual property rights. Different countries have different
laws and regulations regarding intellectual property, which can make it difficult to prosecute
offenders who operate across borders. Additionally, some countries may have weaker or non-
existent intellectual property laws, making them more attractive to offenders looking to profit
from stolen intellectual property.

Changing Nature of Intellectual Property

Finally, the changing nature of intellectual property is another challenge in the regulation and
prevention of Intellectual Property Theft. Advances in technology have created new forms of
intellectual property, such as digital content, which can be easily replicated and distributed.
This has led to new forms of Intellectual Property Theft, such as piracy and counterfeiting,
which can be difficult to detect and prevent.

d. How do we best respond to such crimes?

The best response to crimes of Intellectual Property Theft is to have a comprehensive

approach that addresses the root causes of the crime while balancing the interests of both the
creators of the intellectual property and the wider society. Here are some ways in which we
can best respond to crimes of Intellectual Property Theft:

Education and Awareness

One of the most important ways to prevent Intellectual Property Theft is through education
and awareness. It is essential to educate the public concerning the value of intellectual
property and the harms caused by theft. This can include educating people about the legal and
ethical implications of Intellectual Property Theft and the consequences it can have on
businesses, individuals, and society as a whole.

Alternative Business Models

One of the root causes of Intellectual Property Theft is the high cost of access to certain
intellectual property. To address this, alternative business models, such as open-source
software and creative commons licensing, can be used to promote the distribution and sharing
of intellectual property while still protecting the rights of the creators.

International Cooperation and consensus

 7

Intellectual Property Theft is a global problem, and it requires international cooperation to

effectively address it. This can involve the sharing of information and best practices among
countries, as well as the development of international standards and regulations to protect
intellectual property rights. Further, this will require countries to work together to develop
and enforce intellectual property laws and regulations that are consistent across borders. This
could involve creating international treaties and agreements, such as the WIPO Copyright
Treaty, to provide a framework for international cooperation.

Restitution and Compensation

Victims of Intellectual Property Theft should be entitled to restitution and compensation for
the harm caused by the crime. This could involve the recovery of stolen property or monetary
compensation for lost revenue or damages. The legal system should provide an efficient and
fair way for victims to seek restitution and compensation.

Balancing of Interests

The response to Intellectual Property Theft should balance the interests of the creators of the
intellectual property and the wider society. While it is crucial to safeguard the rights of the
creators, it is also essential to ensure that intellectual property laws do not unduly restrict
access to information or hinder innovation.

Proportionate Punishment

Offenders of Intellectual Property Theft should face proportionate punishment. This could
involve a variety of penalties, from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the
crime. Punishment should be designed to deter future offenders and protect the rights of the
creators of intellectual property.

Strengthened Enforcement

Strengthened enforcement mechanisms are necessary to effectively prosecute Intellectual

Property Theft. This could involve increasing the resources and expertise available to law
enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies, as well as increasing penalties for offenders. For
example, governments could provide more funding for law enforcement agencies and
regulatory bodies to investigate and prosecute Intellectual Property Theft cases. They could
also establish specialized units or task forces to focus specifically on Intellectual Property
Theft.
 8

Support for Innovation

Finally, the response to Intellectual Property Theft should include support for innovation.
This could involve investing in research and development, as well as policies and incentives
that promote the creation of new intellectual property. By supporting innovation, we can
ensure that intellectual property continues to drive economic growth and development.

Conclusion

In conclusion, responding to crimes of Intellectual Property Theft requires a multi-faceted

approach that addresses the root causes of the crime, protects the rights of creators, and
balances the interests of the wider society. Through education and awareness, alternative
business models, international cooperation, restitution and compensation, balancing of
interests, proportionate punishment, and support for innovation, we can effectively respond to
Intellectual Property Theft and create a fair and just society.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Yeh, Brian T. Protection of trade secrets: Overview of current law and legislation. Vol. 5.
Congressional Research Service, 2014.
 9

JOURNALS

Ajayi, Emmanuel Femi Gbenga, ‘Challenges to enforcement of cyber-crimes laws and

policy’ (Journal of Internet and Information Systems 6, no. 1, 2016) 1-12

ALLIANCE against Counterfeiting and Piracy, ‘Proving the connection: Links between
intellectual property theft and organised crime’ (2002)14

Broadhurst, Roderic, ‘Developments in the global law enforcement of cyber‐crime’ (Policing:

An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 29, no. 3, 2006) 408-433

Conor Roach, ‘What is Intellectual Property Theft & How Do I Prevent It?’ (April 20, 2022)

Chang, Lennon YC, Lena Y. Zhong, and Peter N. Grabosky, ‘Citizen co‐production of cyber
security: Self‐help, vigilantes, and cybercrime’ (Regulation & Governance 12, no. 1, 2018)
110

Deora, Raj Singh, and Dhaval Chudasama, ‘Brief study of cybercrime on an

internet’ (Journal of Communication Engineering & Systems 11, no. 1, 2021) 1-6

Dutfield, Graham, ‘TK unlimited: The emerging but incoherent international law of
traditional knowledge protection’ (The Journal of World Intellectual Property 20, no. 5-6,
2017) 144-159

Grabosky, Peter, Russell G. Smith, Russell Gordon Smith, and Gillian Dempsey. Electronic
theft: Unlawful acquisition in cyberspace. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Halbert, Debora, ‘Intellectual property theft and national security: Agendas and assumptions’
( The Information Society 32, no. 4, 2016) 256-268

Hinduja, Sameer, ‘Neutralization theory and online software piracy: An empirical

analysis’ (Ethics and Information Technology 9, no. 3, 2007) 187

Holland, Martin, Josip Stjepandić, and Christopher Nigischer, ‘Intellectual property

protection of 3D print supply chain with blockchain technology’ (In 2018 IEEE International
conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, 2018) 1-8

Lide, E. Casey, ‘ADR and cyberspace: the role of alternative dispute resolution in online
commerce, intellectual property and defamation’ Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 12 (1996) 193.
 10

McCorkle, Denny, James Reardon, Douglas Dalenberg, Andrew Pryor, and John Wicks,
‘Purchase or pirate: a model of consumer intellectual property theft’ (Journal of Marketing
Theory and Practice 20, no. 1, 2012) 73

Mclllwain, Jeffrey Scott, ‘Intellectual property theft and organized crime: The case of film
piracy’ (Trends in Organized Crime 8, no. 4, 2005) 15

Meltzer, Joshua Paul, ‘The I nternet, Cross‐Border Data Flows and International Trade’ (Asia
& the Pacific Policy Studies 2, no. 1, 2015) 90-102

Minagawa Jr, Tetsuya, Paul Trott, and Andreas Hoecht, ‘Counterfeit, imitation, reverse
engineering and learning: reflections from Chinese manufacturing firms’ (R&d
Management 37, no. 5, 2007) 455-467

Wall‐Parker, April, ‘Measuring white collar crime’ (The Handbook of White‐Collar Crime,
2019) 32-44

Shinder, Debra Littlejohn, and Michael Cross. Scene of the Cybercrime. Elsevier (2008)

Shultz II, Clifford J., and Bill Saporito, ‘Protecting intellectual property: Strategies and
recommendations to deter counterfeiting and brand piracy in global markets’ (The Columbia
Journal of World Business 31, no. 1, 1996) 18-28

Tao, Hai, Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan, Md Arafatur Rahman, Guojun Wang, Tian Wang, Md
Manjur Ahmed, and Jing Li., ‘Economic perspective analysis of protecting big data security
and privacy’ (Future Generation Computer Systems 98, 2019) 660-671

ONLINE SOURCES

Upcounsel, ‘Intellectual Theft: Everything You Need to Know’ (October 27, 2020) <
https://www.upcounsel.com/intellectual-theft >Accessed 12 April 2023