SITUATIONAL THEORY OF LEADERSHIP
Leadership is Situational
According to the situational approach, the effectiveness of a leader depends
upon the situation in which leadership is exercised. Leadership is a function
of the leader, the led or followers and the situation. There is an interaction
between the leader and the
group. People tend to follow the
leader when they perceive him
to be capable of fulfilling their
aspirations. Thus, a leader is a
means of achieving the goals of
the group and of its members.
The main situational variables
are the type of the organisation,
the nature of the task or job and
the working environment.
According to the situational
theory, leadership is
Situational, i.e., effectiveness
of leadership is affected by the
Situation from which a leader
emerges and in which he works.
In other words, the situation—
the group, the problem and its
International
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
Economic
ORGANISATION
[Objectives, People,
Structure and Technology}
Leader —— Followers,
Socio-cultural
Situational model of leadership.environment will affect the type of leadership. An important aspect of this
theory is the interaction between the group and its leader within the parameters
of the organisation and the situational factors as shown in Fig.
The leader recognises his followers’ needs and adopts such methods
(depending on the situation) which satisfy them. The main thrust of the
situational theory is that the leadership style may be effective under one situation
and ineffective under the other. In other words, situational theory emphasises
that there is no one best style of leadership universally applicable to
all situations and that the leader has to change his style of leadership from
situation to situation. If the leader adopts the same style under all situations, he
may not be successful. For example, Winston Churchill was the most effective
and successful Prime Minister of Britain during the period of the Second World
War, but he was a flop afterwards when the situation changed.
Though this theory states leadership ability of an individual in a given
situation and measures his leadership potentialities, it is silent on the point
whether this individual will fit in another situation. The situational theory
suffers from the following weaknesses :
(i) It gives much emphasis on situation aspect and overlooks the qualities
needed in a successful leader.
(ii) Leadership is a subjective consideration in which qualities of head and
heart of a leader play their part. But this theory overlooks this aspect.Fiedler’s Contingency TI
Fred Fiedler developed a contingency theory which described successful
leadership as a direct result of matching manager's styles with situational
variables, Fiedler grouped situational variables into three areas of concern :
the degree to which the followers,
ccept their leader, -~
‘The task structure or the degree to whi i elled out
——— eee
routinised.
iiiy/Position power of the leader, That is, the degree of formal authority’
attributed to the leader's position.
Grese three variables getermine Qhether a given situatioh is favourable
Dunfavoural le to the leader.)The favourabieness of situation may be defined |
as “the degree to which the $ttuation enables the leader to exert his influence |
over his group.”
iedler perceived ei
it possible combinations of the three situational
As a leadership lon varies from high to
on these va as, it falls‘nto one of the eight combinations or situations(The
s one in which the leader-follo tions are
vel od, the leader enjoys great position power and the task st
rained, On the other hand, the most_unfavourable situation signifies that
the Te: is_di the_leader has little position power an the task is
unstructured. ed
——SaooFiedler’s Situational Combinations
Situational Lea Te Position Situational
Combination fone: stctio pawer favour-
relations, =—— ae. ableness
1. Good f High) Strong yj HIGH
2. Good righ| Weak |
3. Good Low Strong )
4. Good Low Weak ,
5. Poor High Strong ,
6. Poor High’ Weak
q. Poor Low Strong y
8. Poor |“ Lowi“ Weak Low
Fidler attempted to determine the most effective leadership style for each
the above eight situations. He came to the conclusion that
task oriented leaders. t@fd to be most effective in situations) that
gither very favourab| €Or) very. unfavourable to them. u
ders tend to-be-most effective in : in situations
favoura urdbleness.
that are intermediate i
—
—
a Relationship-oriented
Task-oriented style | contidereia style | Task-oriented style
Favourable leadership _Siituation intermediate in Untavourable leadership
situation favourableness for Leader
situation
Leadership styles appropriate tor Various Group Situations