This document contains questions pertaining to competition law for the June/July 2015 examination. It includes questions about:
1) The definition of competition and the struggle for superiority in commerce.
2) Constitutional provisions governing trade and commerce under competition law in India.
3) The illegality of abuse of a dominant position in the market, even if dominance itself is not illegal.
3) The powers of the Federal Trade Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 and offenses/penalties under the Act.
This document contains questions pertaining to competition law for the June/July 2015 examination. It includes questions about:
1) The definition of competition and the struggle for superiority in commerce.
2) Constitutional provisions governing trade and commerce under competition law in India.
3) The illegality of abuse of a dominant position in the market, even if dominance itself is not illegal.
3) The powers of the Federal Trade Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 and offenses/penalties under the Act.
This document contains questions pertaining to competition law for the June/July 2015 examination. It includes questions about:
1) The definition of competition and the struggle for superiority in commerce.
2) Constitutional provisions governing trade and commerce under competition law in India.
3) The illegality of abuse of a dominant position in the market, even if dominance itself is not illegal.
3) The powers of the Federal Trade Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 and offenses/penalties under the Act.
1. “Competition means a struggle or contention for superiority in the
commercial world”. Elucidate. 2. Explain the constitutional provisions governing the trade and commerce under competition law. 3. “Dominance per se is not illegal, but the abuse of the position of dominance is illegal”. Discuss. 4. Mention the powers of Federal Trade Commission (FTC), constituted under the Federal Trade Commission Act, 1914. What are the offences recognized and penalties prescribed under the Act? 5. What are the salient features of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986? How does the Act owe its relevance to the spirit of competition? 6. Discuss the provisions relating to the establishment functions of the Competition Commission of India (CCI). Mention the procedure of conducting inquiries by the CCI. 7. How is Director General (Investigation) appointed? What are the contraventions under the Competition Act, 2002 that he can investigate? 8. Write short note on any two of the following: a. Price Fixing. b. Doctrine of appreciable adverse effect on competition. c. ‘Cease and desist’ order. 9. Solve any two of the following problems: a. In recent years, the state governments in India have launched the programme of issuing Ration Cards for Below Poverty Line (BPL) to a certain category of economically poorer sections of the society. One Barsal Ali of the State of the West Bengal was one of the Beneficiaries to get the BPL Ration Card under the Public Distribution System (PDS). As a consumer, he had purchased edible oil from a fair price depot as his family quota. He and his family members have suffered paralysis strokes on their lower limbs. The Food Laboratory Test revealed that edible oil was adulterated with rapeseed oil, due to which the entire family suffered paralysis strokes. Advise Barsal Ali. Also quote decided case law under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. b. A ‘Cartel’ which was formed on January 20, 2003 within the definition of Section-2 (c) of the Competition Act, 2002, continued to be in existence till May 21, 2009. It entered into Anticompetition Agreement with other entities on January 20, 2003 and caused appreciable adverse effect on competition. Can the Competition Commission of India which was established on October 19, 2003 but came into force w.e.f. May 15, 2009 take action against the Cartel? Decide with reasons vis-à-vis legal issues under the Competition Act, 2002 with amendments thereof. c. Mr. Sonam Sharma has furnished information to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) alleging that APPLE International Corporation has entered into Tie-in-agreement secretly with VODAFONE and AIRTEL for sale of iphone in India in order to get exclusive right. iphones were compulsorily locked so that they could work on their own network to the exclusion of other networks. Mr. Sonam Sharma has also alleged that such an activity resulted in limiting and controlling iphone market by creating entry barriers for other competitors in India. Based on the investigation report of the Director General, CCI has ordered for closure of the matter. Against the orders of CCI, an appeal was preferred before the Supreme Court of India for various violations under the Competition Act, 2002. Decide with reasons and the decided case law. -------