Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indefinite pronouns by definition reference nonspecific things or people. Most of these pronouns
take a singular verb, some are always plural, and a few may be either singular or plural. Take a
look at the lists below, and you'll notice that most indefinite pronouns are singular.
Singular: another, anybody, anyone, anything, each, either, everybody, everyone, everything,
many a, neither, no one, nobody, nothing, one, other, somebody, someone
Plural: both, few, many, others, several
Singular or Plural: all, any, none, some, such
A good rule of thumb is to treat most indefinite pronouns as singular and try to remember the
few exceptions.
Another very important thing is to think of these pronouns as not one, and that will quickly
resolve the issue.
Example 1: Neither of the attorneys (was/were) available for comment.
Think: Not one of the attorneys was available for comment. (singular subject/singular verb)
Example 2: None of the documents (is/are) identified in the brief.
Think: Not one of the documents is identified in the brief. (singular subject/singular verb)
Example 3: Some of the arguments (was/were) weak.
Think: More than one of the arguments were weak. (plural subject/plural verb)
4. AMONG VS BETWEEN
The simple rule will rarely fail you: use between for two things, among for more than two.
'Between' is used to promote feeling of separation whereas 'among' is used to treat a group
collectively.
There was sand between her fingers.
My house lies between the forest, the river, and the mountain.
My house lies among other houses in the street.
5. IT'S VS ITS
There's no handy short cut; all you can do is memorize the rule. It's with an apostrophe means it
is; its without an apostrophe means belonging to it.
6. LESS VS FEWER
Less means "not as much"; fewer means "not as many." You earn less money by selling fewer
products; you use less oil but eat fewer fries. If you can count them, use fewer.
Another explanation
Use fewer with objects that can be counted one-by-one.
Use less with qualities or quantities that cannot be individually counted.
Incorrect: There were less days below freezing last winter.
Correct: There were fewer days below freezing last winter.
(Days can be counted.)
Correct: I drank less water than she did.
(Water cannot be counted individually here.)
When referring to time or money, less is normally used even with numbers. Specific units of
time or money use fewer only in cases where individual items are referred to.
Examples: I have less than an hour to do this work.
I have less time to this work.
I have less money than I need.
I have less than twenty dollars.
He worked fewer hours than I did.
The only occasion in which you might say, "I have fewer than twenty dollars," would be when
you were talking about specific dollar bills or coins, such as "I have fewer than twenty silver
dollars in my collection."
7. WHICH THAT AND WHO (This is tricky one so pay attention)
Use which for parenthetical remarks and asides (nonrestrictive clauses). Such remarks are not
essential to the meaning of the sentence and can be omitted without losing the sense of the
sentence. Nonrestrictive clauses are set off by commas.
Use that for clauses that limit or define (restrictive clauses). These clauses are necessary to the
meaning of the sentence. You can omit that in a sentence, but don't leave it out if there's any
possibility of confusion.
When referring to a person, use who rather than which or that.
Which, that, and who are not interchangeable. Which usually refers to things, that to either
things or people, and who to people. When you can replace that with who, do so. Other life
forms take that. But how should you refer to a dog with a personality? There are always
exceptions.
Examples
Let's look at some examples:
The wagon, which [incidentally] is now broken, was purchased at a home improvement store.
The clause which is now broken can be omitted without disrupting the meaning of the sentence.
It is not essential to the sentence (nonrestrictive). It's simply additional information.
The wagon that is broken was purchased at a home improvement store.
This one particular wagon is broken; others are not broken. The clause that is broken restricts the
meaning of wagon to the one that is in disrepair (restrictive).
The brochure, which was designed by our marketing department, won high praise at the meeting.
The nonrestrictive clause which was designed by our marketing department provides
parenthetical information and can be omitted without destroying the meaning of the sentence.
The brochure that was designed by our marketing department won high praise at the meeting.
Notice how in the thrust of the sentence changes for 'brochure' to 'marketing department'
as 'which' is changed to 'that'
The marketing department brochure was a winner; the brochures designed by other departments
did not win kudos.
The attorney, who graduated from Yale, filed the motion with the court yesterday.
The clause adds parenthetical information (nonrestrictive).
The attorney who graduated from Yale filed the motion with the court yesterday.
It was specifically the Yale graduate who took action rather than the Harvard graduate
(restrictive).
The teachers, who have educated my son, deserve an award for patience.
This nonrestrictive clause refers to all of the teachers your son has had in his school career.
The teachers who have educated my son deserve an award for patience.
You are now referring to only the more effective of your son's teachers; other teachers may not
have had an impact (and were probably not as patient with your son).
8. COMPARED TO VS COMPARED WITH
To show comparison between unlike things, "compare to" is used. To show comparison between
like things, "compare with" is used.
Example
He compared her to a summer day.
Scientists compare the human brain to a computer. (Unlike thing)
The police compared the forged signature with the original. (Like things)
There are two rules which you should consider. First read the usage notes from dictionary.com:
Compare usually takes the preposition to when it refers to the activity of describing the
resemblances between unlike things:
He compared her to a summer day.
"Scientists sometimes compare the human brain to a computer.
Compare takes with when it refers to the act of examining two like things in order to discern
their similarities or differences:
" The police compared the forged signature with the original.
" The committee will have to compare the Senate's version of the bill with the version that was
passed by the House.
When compare is used to mean "to liken" (one) with another, with is traditionally held to be
the correct preposition:
That little bauble is not to be compared with (not to) this enormous jewel. But "to" is
frequently used in this context and is not incorrect.
Rule 1: Compare to compares unlike things, whereas compare with compares like things.
Rule 2: Compare to is used to stress the resemblance. Compare with can be used to show
either similarity or difference but is usually used to stress the difference.
There is a difference between compare to and compare with;
the first is to liken one thing to another;
the second is to note the resemblances and differences between two things.
9. IF VS WHETHER
Use if for a conditional idea, whether for an alternative or possibility.
Thus, Let me know if you'll be coming means that I want to hear from you only if you're coming.
But Let me know whether you'll be coming means that I want to hear from you about your plans
one way or the other.
ASLO
1. Whether is correct when you're discussing two options (whether to get chocolate or
strawberry ice cream) and if is correct for more than two options (if she should get ice cream,
frozen yogurt, or a cookie).
On the GMAT, whether will (almost) always beat if
Incorrect: Her client didn't tell her if he had sent his payment yet.
Correct: Her client didn't tell her whether he had sent his payment yet.
10. AMOUNT VS NUMBER
Amount should be used to refer to quantities that cannot be counted or cannot be expressed in
terms of a single number.
Example: "Repairing the Edsel took a great amount of work."
Number is used for quantities that can be counted.
Example: "A large number of deer ate the corn."
11. LIKE VS AS
As and like are used in a number of different ways and can be different parts of speech.
'as' and 'like' - prepositions
As refers to something or someone's appearance or function.
Example:
'Before I became a teacher I worked as a waiter.'
'I'm going to the fancy dress party as Superman.'
'The sea can be used as a source of energy.'
The expression 'I've been working as a dog' sounds unusual because it suggests that you were
doing the work of a dog!
Like has the meaning 'similar to' and is used when comparing things. Look at these examples:
'I've been working like a dog.'
'She looks a bit like her brother.'
'Just like you, I'm always a bit wary of large dogs.'
The expression 'I've been working like a dog' is idiomatic and means that you have been working
very hard. Note that we can use adverbs of degree, such as just, very, quite, not much, not at
all, a bit, etc, to modify like:
'He's very serious " not at all like his father, perhaps more like his mother at times.
'as' and 'like' - conjunctions
As and like can also be used as conjunctions:
As means 'in the same way that'. Consider the following:
'I always drink tea without milk, just as they do on the continent.'
'Try to keep your balance on the tightrope, as I do, by spreading out your fingers like this.'
'The first ten days of July were very wet this year, as they were last year and the year before.'
In informal English, like is used in the same way. This is particularly common in American
English. Consider the following:
'Nobody else would look after you like I do, baby!'
'She needs the money, like I do, so she works in a bar in the evenings.'
'I hope you're not going to be sick again, like you were when we went to Brighton.
12. BECAUSE VS IN THAT
One should also be aware of the difference between because and in that. First, using pure
strategy, when a question has both because and in that, the answer is most likely in that.
Second, because is used to express a simple causal relationship whereas in that qualifies the
previous statement.