Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 - The Concept of Strategy
2 - The Concept of Strategy
AGENDA
Value for whom: the shareholder approach vs. the stakeholder approach
Strategic fit
26
REVIEW:VALUE FOR WHOM?
A firm achieves a competitive advantage when it creates more economic value than competitors by engaging in
a strategy that is difficult or impossible for others to duplicate.
27
Source: Ireland, R. D., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. 2013. The Management of Strategy: Concepts and Cases. 10th Edition. Cengage Learning.
A BRIEF SUMMARY: WHY EMPHASIZING SHAREHOLDER INTERESTS?
• The shareholders initiate the firm. Without shareholders, the firm cannot exist in a legal sense.
• Shareholders’ interests could be harmed by managers who have more information and whose
interests are not aligned with the shareholders. Hence, firms (especially powerful managers who want
to demonstrate their stewardship commitment) emphasize the maximization of shareholder value.
28
THE STAKEHOLDER APPROACH
Capital market stakeholders:
The definition of stakeholders: Shareholders
Major suppliers of capital (e.g., banks)
Stakeholders are people who are affected by a
firm’s performance and who have claims on its Product market stakeholders:
performance. Customers
Suppliers
Host communities
Unions
Organizational stakeholders:
Employees
29
Managers
Source: Ireland, R. D., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. 2013. The Management of Strategy: Concepts and Cases. 10th Edition. Cengage Learning.
EXAMPLE: GOOGLE
30
EXAMPLE: GOOGLE
...
31
The stakeholder approach: Firms should balance different and often conflicting interests of stakeholders.
32
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
EXAMPLE: BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
Since 1978, Business Roundtable has periodically issued Principles of Corporate Governance that include
language on the purpose of a corporation. Each version of that document issued since 1997 has
stated that corporations exist principally to serve their shareholders. It has become clear that
this language on corporate purpose does not accurately describe the ways in which we and our fellow
CEOs endeavor every day to create value for all our stakeholders, whose long-term interests are
inseparable.
33
Source: https://opportunity.businessroundtable.org/ourcommitment/
EXAMPLE: BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
Delivering value to our customers. We will further the tradition of American companies leading the
way in meeting or exceeding customer expectations.
Investing in our employees. This starts with compensating them fairly and providing important
benefits. It also includes supporting them through training and education that help develop new skills for
a rapidly changing world. We foster diversity and inclusion, dignity and respect.
Dealing fairly and ethically with our suppliers. We are dedicated to serving as good partners to the
other companies, large and small, that help us meet our missions.
Supporting the communities in which we work. We respect the people in our communities and
protect the environment by embracing sustainable practices across our businesses.
Generating long-term value for shareholders, who provide the capital that allows companies to
invest, grow and innovate. We are committed to transparency and effective engagement with
34
shareholders.
Source: https://opportunity.businessroundtable.org/ourcommitment/
WHICH APPROACH IS BETTER?
35
PROBLEMS OF THE SHAREHOLDER APPROACH
Short-termism
Harm other stakeholders’ legitimate interests
36
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
EXAMPLE: ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND
When Royal Bank of Scotland was preparing to sell a package of US subprime mortgages in October 2007,
staff were keen to reassure investors about the quality of the loans and the thoroughness of its due diligence.
However, inside the bank, people were worried…
• The US chief credit officer: “[it were] like quasi organized crime” and the loans were “total f***ing garbage”
• Transcripts of internal discussions showed staff joking about “destroying” the US housing market, and the
“redistribut[ing] of wealth to Wall Street”.
• When executives asked for better due diligence, one senior banker said “Oh, God. Does anyone want to
make money around here any more?”
In 2018, the US Department of Justice and RBS reached an agreement on a $4.9 billion fine for the bank’s
behavior between 2005 and 2008.
RBS’s shareholders were angry about the settlement. One of them said it was galling that the US was
demanding almost $5 billion from a bank that was still controlled by the UK government after being bailed
out in 2008. 37
Source: http://www.ftchinese.com/story/001079013?full=y&ccode=2G172001&archive
PROBLEMS OF THE STAKEHOLDER APPROACH
While the concept of the firm operating in the interest of all their stakeholders is inherently appealing,
in practice the stakeholder approach encounters at least two serious difficulties:
Managers may still take advantage of other stakeholders. With principals who are even more
diffused, managers would have more opportunities to play politics and substitute their own
interests for those of stakeholders.
38
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
EXAMPLE: GM AND UAW
The longest auto workers’ strike in 50 years in the US from September to October in 2019:
Who lost:
- GM’s loss up to $4 billion for 2019
- Widespread layoffs at auto suppliers and GM’s
operations in Canada and Mexico
39
Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/29/uaw-strike-cost-gm-about-3point8-billion-for-2019-substantially-higher-than-estimated.html
EXAMPLE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON
40
Source: https://www.jnj.com/credo/
EXAMPLE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Our Credo
We believe our first responsibility is to the patients, doctors and nurses, to mothers and
fathers and all others who use our products and services. In meeting their needs everything we do
must be of high quality. We must constantly strive to provide value, reduce our costs and maintain
reasonable prices. Customers' orders must be serviced promptly and accurately. Our business partners
must have an opportunity to make a fair profit.
41
Source: https://www.jnj.com/credo/
EXAMPLE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON
We are responsible to our employees who work with us throughout the world. We must provide
an inclusive work environment where each person must be considered as an individual. We must respect
their diversity and dignity and recognize their merit. They must have a sense of security, fulfillment and
purpose in their jobs. Compensation must be fair and adequate and working conditions clean, orderly and
safe. We must support the health and well-being of our employees and help them fulfill their family and
other personal responsibilities. Employees must feel free to make suggestions and complaints. There must
be equal opportunity for employment, development and advancement for those qualified. We must provide
highly capable leaders and their actions must be just and ethical.
42
Source: https://www.jnj.com/credo/
EXAMPLE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON
We are responsible to the communities in which we live and work and to the world
community as well. We must help people be healthier by supporting better access and care in more
places around the world. We must be good citizens — support good works and charities, better health and
education, and bear our fair share of taxes. We must maintain in good order the property we are privileged
to use, protecting the environment and natural resources.
43
Source: https://www.jnj.com/credo/
EXAMPLE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Our final responsibility is to our stockholders. Business must make a sound profit. We must
experiment with new ideas. Research must be carried on, innovative programs developed, investments
made for the future and mistakes paid for. New equipment must be purchased, new facilities provided and
new products launched. Reserves must be created to provide for adverse times. When we operate
according to these principles, the stockholders should realize a fair return.
44
Source: https://www.jnj.com/credo/
EXAMPLE: ALIBABA GROUP
45
Source: https://www.alibabagroup.com/en/about/culture
THE TREND SEEMS INEVITABLE, BUT WHY?
Why do more and more firms make claims that are consistent with the stakeholder approach?
46
THE TREND SEEMS INEVITABLE, BUT WHY?
47
THEN HOW DO FIRMS TACKLE THE DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED
BY THE STAKEHOLDER APPROACH?
Give priority
Develop a feasible value allocation mechanism
48
EXAMPLE: HUAWEI
Employees (including managers) are the essential driver of the firm’s sustainable development. Hence,
value distribution should prioritize employees over shareholders. The firm should prevent shareholders
from greed and short-termism.
49
Source: 田涛。2018。我花了20年研究华为。虎嗅网。
RECONCILE THE TWO: MAXIMIZING PROFITS OVER THE LONG
TERM
We need to set a primary goal for our strategy analysis:
Maximize the value of the enterprise through seeking to maximize long-term profits
2. Long-term profits facilitate long-term survival of the firm, which is welcome by all stakeholders, who
would appropriate value from the firm. Long-term profits requires loyalty from employees, trusting
relationships with suppliers and customers, and support from governments and communities.
50
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: HOW TO PROTECT SHAREHOLDERS’
LEGITIMATE INTERESTS?
The board of directors:
a group of individuals elected by the shareholders whose primary responsibility is to act in the
shareholders’ interests by formally monitoring and controlling the firm’s top-level managers.
Insiders
The firm’s CEO and other top-level managers
Related outsiders
Individuals not involved with the firm’s day-to-day operations, but who have a relationship with
the company
Outsiders
Individuals who are independent of the firm in terms of day-to-day operations and other
51
relationships
Source: Hitt et al. 2017. Strategic Management: Competitiveness & Globalization. Concepts and Cases. 12th Edition. Cengage Learning.
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
52
Source: Grant, R. M. 2022. Contemporary Strategy Analysis. 11th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
EXAMPLE: UNILEVER’S SUSTAINABLE LIVING PLAN
53
Source: Grant, R. M. 2022. Contemporary Strategy Analysis. 11th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Source: https://www.unilever.com/news/press-and-media/press-releases/2020/unilever-celebrates-10-years-of-the-sustainable-living-plan/
EXAMPLE: UNILEVER’S SUSTAINABLE LIVING PLAN
According to Paul Polman, the former CEO of Unilever, the benefits of this
CSR program for Unilever include:
• Improved access to raw materials
• Greater employee commitment
• A stronger drive toward innovation throughout the company
• Greatly increased numbers of applications for jobs at Unilever
• Improvement in efficiency in Unilever plants and throughout its supply
chain
However, the program has done little to boost Unilever’s commercial and financial performance. Its leading
shareholders wondered whether senior executives’ commitment to combatting climate change and world
poverty was distracting them from the more mundane tasks of selling margarine and laundry detergent.
54
Source: Grant, R. M. 2022. Contemporary Strategy Analysis. 11th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Source: https://www.unilever.com/news/press-and-media/press-releases/2020/unilever-celebrates-10-years-of-the-sustainable-living-plan/
AGENDA
Value for whom: the shareholder approach vs. the stakeholder approach
Strategic fit
55
REVIEW: THE DEFINITION OF STRATEGY
A strategy is an integrated series of commitments and actions that provide a roadmap by which an
organization maximizes its internal resources and external positioning to gain competitive advantage.
56
CONSISTENCY (ALSO KNOWN AS STRATEGIC FIT)
57
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
58
Source: Grant, R. M. 2022. Contemporary Strategy Analysis. 11th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
59
Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/photos-queen-elizabeth-ii-meeting-with-every-us-president-since-she-began-her-reign/article/2614071
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
61
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
2. How do you describe the external environment of Queen Elizabeth II and her royal family?
62
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
3. What internal resources did they have?
63
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
4. What do you think was their overall strategy?
64
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
Overall goal:
Overall strategy:
66
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
Public service
strategy
International
relation strategy
Political strategy
Family strategy 67
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
Public relation strategy
68
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
Public service strategy
69
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/voluntary-sector-network/2012/jun/11/queen-charitable-support
Source: https://www.royal.uk/charities-and-patronages-1
Source: https://qef.org.uk/
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
International relation strategy
She has made multiple visits to each of the 54 Commonwealth nations, including 26 to Canada and 16 to Australia.
70
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Source: Wikipedia
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
Political strategy
Political neutrality
Positioning herself above the political fray
71
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/royalty/8507797/Long-to-reign-over-us-Queen-Elizabeth-II-in-pictures.html?image=24
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
Family strategy
?
72
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
The Queen’s strategy is risky!
73
CASE: QUEEN ELIZABETH II AND THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
The Queen’s paradox: Conformity and Distinctiveness
74
SWOT ANALYSIS
External analysis
Strategy Strategy
formulation implementation
Internal
analysis
Strength Weakness
Internal
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
SWOT ANALYSIS
Strength Weakness
Internal
76
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
STRATEGY TOOLS AND FRAMEWORKS
Source: Puranam, P., Vanneste, B. Corporate strategy: Tools for analysis and decision-making.
WHAT STRATEGY ANALYSIS CAN AND CANNOT DO
Cannot do Can do
Generate solution to Help us understand the
problems issues: allow us to identify,
classify, and understand the
Offer algorithms or principal factors relevant to
formulae that tell us the strategic decisions
optimal strategy to adopt
Improve our flexibility
78
Source: Grant, R. M. 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases. 9th Edition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
WRAP-UP
Strategy is a set of commitments and actions. The key elements in the definition of strategy:
Actions or actions to be taken in the future
Internal resources
External environment
Value (profit)
Competitive
Integrated
The competing shareholder approach and stakeholder approach might be reconciled by pursuing
long-term profit.The change from shareholder approach to stakeholder approach reflects the
change in what are the most scarce resources.
A key feature of a good strategy: strategic fit (or, consistency)
A firm’s strategy should be consistent with its external environment.
A firm’s strategy should be consistent with its internal resources.
79
A firm’s strategy should achieve internal consistency among its commitments and actions.
ASSIGNMENT
Pre-class reading:
Apple Inc. in 2015. Harvard Business School. 9-715-456. [Read only Page 1 – Page 6 (i.e., before
“The Macintosh and Apple’s ‘Digital Hub’ Strategy”]
80