5/9/23, 6:20 PM Curative Petition Provisions and Leading cases - Law Insider India

()
(https://www.lawinsider.in/)

Add the extension

 (https://www.lawinsider.in) HOME (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/)

BREAKING (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/CATEGORY/TRENDING)
Home (https://www.lawinsider.in) / COLUMNS (https://www.lawinsider.in/category/columns) /
Curative Petition Provisions and Leading cases (https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/curative-petition-provisions-and-leading-cases)
NEWS (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/CATEGORY/NEWS) INTERNATIONAL (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/CATEGORY/INTERNATIONAL)

COLUMNS (https://www.lawinsider.in/category/columns)
COLUMNS (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/CATEGORY/COLUMNS) REPORTS (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/CATEGORY/REPORT)
Curative Petition Provisions and Leading cases
JUDGMENT (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/CATEGORY/JUDGMENT)
7 min read
VIDEOS/WEBINAR (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/CATEGORY/VIDEOS-WEBINAR)
 December 27, 2020
STUDY (HTTPS://WWW.LAWINSIDER.IN/CATEGORY/STUDY)

Vasundhara Singh

Importance of fair trial cannot be overstated because it the only way to prevent miscarriage of justice and is an important part of a just
society. A fair trial means a trial where all the bias against the accused, victim and the witness are eliminated and all the parties are given
equal chance to be heard before a competent authority.


https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/curative-petition-provisions-and-leading-cases 1/6
5/9/23, 6:20 PM Curative Petition Provisions and Leading cases - Law Insider India
Denial of fair trial is as much injustice to the accused as it is to the victim and the society

In a democratic country like India, the right to fair trial is embodied in the constitution under Article 21
(https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1199182/) and even an accused or a convict cannot be denied their right to life and personal liberty.

The chance of impartial hearing protects an innocent person from suffering by the hands of unjust system and follows the principals of
natural justice which disapproves any kind of bias and abuse pf power by the judicial authorities.

A lesser known and rarely put to use judicial instrument called curative petition made its way into headlines recently which serves the
purpose of securing justice and protecting the rights of a convict. Curative petitions are petitions which have are considerably new to the
Indian legal and judicial system.

It works as a last resort for the aggrieved in the hope of justice being served after a review petition is dismissed by the apex court. While
some appreciate it by considering it as the last opportunity to be heard, others criticisms it by calling it an unnecessary creation which
goes against the powers of the Supreme court.

What is Curative petition?

It is the last resort by the aggrieved party to receive justice which is guaranteed under the constitution of India. Curative petition can be
filed after the dismissal of review petition having the same grounds as curative petition and the objective behind allowing such a petition
is to minimize the abuse of law process and ensure smooth functioning of justice system.

[1]
The concept of curative petition evolved from the landmark judgement in Rupa Ashok Hurra V. Ashok Hurra and Anr where the issue
raised was whether an aggrieved person is entitled to relief against the final judgement of Supreme court after the dismissal of the review
petition.

It is based on legal maxim “actus curiae neminem gravabit” which means that the act of court shall prejudice no one and it has to undo the
wrong done to the aggrieved party.

The legal requirements required for this petition are narrow in scope and hence it was decided by the court that it should be availed in
rarest of rare cases. Hearing of curative petition is usually held in judges chamber unless a specific request for an open court hearing is
allowed.

Legal provisions to file a curative petition

The apex court in Supreme Court rules 2013[2] has laid down guidelines regarding the procedure of filing a curative petition which are
mentioned in order XLVIII.

1. Curative Petitions shall be governed by Judgment of the Court dated 10th April, 2002 delivered in the case of ‘Rupa Ashok Hurrah v.
Ashok Hurrah and Ors.’ in Writ Petition (C) No. 509 of 1997.

2. (1) The petitioner, in the curative petition, shall aver specifically that the grounds mentioned therein had been taken in the Review
Petition and that it was dismissed by circulation.

(2) A Curative Petition shall be accompanied by a certificate of the Senior Advocate that the petition meets the requirements delineated in
the above case.

(3) A curative petition shall be accompanied by a certificate of the Advocate on Record to the effect that it is the first curative petition in
the impugned matter.

3. The Curative Petition shall be filed within reasonable time from the date of Judgment or Order passed in the Review Petition.

4. (1) The curative petition shall be first circulated to a Bench of the three senior-most judges and the judges who passed the judgment
complained of, if available.

(2) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a curative petition shall be disposed of by circulation without any oral arguments but the
petitioner may supplement his petition by additional written arguments.

(3) If the Bench before which a curative petition was circulated concludes by a majority that the matter needs hearing then it shall be listed
before the same Bench, as far as possible.

(4) If the Court, at any stage, comes to the conclusion that the petition is without any merit and vexatious, it may impose exemplary costs
on the petitioner.

Landmark Judgement
Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra & Anr (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/123456797/)

This was a case of a matrimonial discord where the question of validity of a decree of divorce reached the SC after the woman withdrew
the consent she had given to divorce by mutual consent.

Issue that arose in front of supreme court pertained to “whether an aggrieved person is entitled to any relief against the final
judgment/order of the Supreme Court, after the dismissal of a review petition?”


https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/curative-petition-provisions-and-leading-cases 2/6
5/9/23, 6:20 PM Curative Petition Provisions and Leading cases - Law Insider India
The case was referred to a constitutional bench of three judges and after closely hearing remarks by counsels and amicus curiae, it was
noted by the court that petitioner is entitled to relief ex debito justitiae if he establishes that there has been violation of natural justice or
where there has been an apprehension of biasness which adversely affected the party or parties and in order to remedy the injustice, the
petition is called curative petition.

It was further noted by the court, “that curative petitions ought to be treated as a rarity rather than regular and the appreciation of the
Court shall have to be upon proper circumspection having regard to the three basic features of our justice delivery system to wit, the order
being in contravention of the doctrine of natural justice or without jurisdiction or in the event of there is even a likelihood of public
confidence being shaken by reason of the association or closeness of a judge with the subject matter in dispute.”[3]

Hence the court devised the mechanism of curative petition.

Leading cases
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State of Maharashtra (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/60103551/)

Decision on curative petition filed by Yakub Memon, lone death row convict of 1993 Mumbai blasts case was repeatedly questioned by
justice Kurian Joseph who was one of the judges of 3-judge bench that dismissed the review petition filed by Yakub Memon.

He was of the opinion that a curative petition should be circulated not only among the three senior-most judges of the Supreme Court but
also among the judges “who passed the judgment complained of, if available.” He pointed out that neither he nor justice Chelameswar
were included in process of hearing curative petition.

Memon’s curative petition was dismissed by a bench of the then Chief Justice of India HL Dattu, Justice TS Thakur and Justice AR Dave.

National Commission for Women v. Bhaskar Lal Sharma & Others (https://www.legitquest.com/case/national-commission-for-women-v-
bhaskar-lal-sharma-others/85E76)

Supreme court in its 2009 judgement held that if a woman kicked her daughter in law or threatened her to divorce, it will not amount to
cruelty under Sec 498A of IPC.
(https://indiankanoon.org/doc/538436/#:~:text=Section%20498A%20in%20The%20Indian%20Penal%20Code&text=
(b)%20harassment%20of%20the%20woman,her%20to%20meet%20such%20demand.%5D)

The respondent/victim filed a review petition against the said order which was dismissed and National Commission of Women moved
court filing curative petition against the order. It was observed by the court that it was dealing with constitutional provision i.e., article 147
(https://indiankanoon.org/doc/242661/) which empowers the court to pass such orders that will ensure justice to the aggrieved and
hence allowed curative petition.

Nirbhaya Case (https://www.lawinsider.in/nairbhaya-gangrape-case-and-hathras-horror/)

Nirbhaya rape case, a horrific crime triggered a storm of protests in the country in December 2012 when Nirbhaya was brutally raped by
six men on the night of 16 December 2012 in a moving bus and was thrown out. The six men were later arrested and one of the persons
committed suicide in prison and the teenager was sent to reformatory.

The remaining accused were sentenced to death by hanging by the sessions court. Both the High Court of Delhi and Supreme Court held
the judgement of death by hanging declared by lower court and later Supreme Court also dismissed their review petitions. The apex court
informed them to file mercy petition before the president within the limitation period.

The president rejected plea mercy and subsequent to that curative petitions were filed before the apex court as the last resort by the
victims to get a stay on the death penalty.

Supreme court stated, “in our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok
Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388. Hence, the Curative Petitions are dismissed.”

It is of utmost importance that judicial authorities endeavour to prevent the abuse of law process, curb miscarriage of justice and ensure
safeguard of fundamental rights of all the citizens guaranteed under the constitution.

Judges are an integral part of justice system and it is on their shoulders the duty to prevent any kind of injustice and deliver judgments
which are impartial and hold the spirit of natural justice.

It cannot be over looked that these judges are also human being and prone to errors at some level or the other. While the decisions of
lower courts can be reviewed, appealed against or revised under various Articles of the Constitution, the supreme court cannot go against
its own judgements in order to make changes. Therefore, the introduction of curative petition was crucial to keep a check on such errors
by the apex court and to review erroneous orders passed by it.

1. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/123456797/ (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/123456797/) ↑

2. http://www.bareactslive.com/ACA/ACT2158.HTM#48 (http://www.bareactslive.com/ACA/ACT2158.HTM#48) ↑

3. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/123456797/ (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/123456797/) ↑

(https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?

u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawinsider.in%2Fcolumns%2Fcurative-
https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/curative-petition-provisions-and-leading-cases 3/6
5/9/23, 6:20 PM Curative Petition Provisions and Leading cases - Law Insider India

petition-provisions-and-leading-cases)
(https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?
text=Curative%20Petition%20Provisions%20and%20Leading%20case
petition-provisions-and-leading-cases)
(http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?
mini=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawinsider.in%2Fcolumns%2Fc
petition-provisions-and-leading-
cases&title=Curative%20Petition%20Provisions%20and%20Leading%
(https://api.whatsapp.com/send?
text=Curative%20Petition%20Provisions%20and%20Leading%20case
https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawinsider.in%2Fcolumns%2Fcurative-
petition-provisions-and-leading-cases)
(https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/curative-petition-
provisions-and-leading-cases)
(https://www.tumblr.com/widgets/share/tool?
posttype=link&canonicalUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawinsider.in%2F
petition-provisions-and-leading-
cases&title=Curative%20Petition%20Provisions%20and%20Leading%
(http://reddit.com/submit?
url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawinsider.in%2Fcolumns%2Fcurative-pet
provisions-and-leading-
cases&title=Curative%20Petition%20Provisions%20and%20Leading%
(https://share.flipboard.com/bookmarklet/popout?
v=2&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawinsider.in%2Fcolumns%2Fcurativ
petition-provisions-and-leading-
cases&title=Curative%20Petition%20Provisions%20and%20Leading%
Tags: Curative Petition (https://www.lawinsider.in/tag/curative-petition) SUPREME COURT (https://www.lawinsider.in/tag/supreme-court)

Previous Next
RERA Landmark Judgements Cornelia Sorabji: Woman of many firsts
(https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/rera-landmark-judgements) (https://www.lawinsider.in/insight/cornelia-sorabji-woman-of-many-firsts)

https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/curative-petition-provisions-and-leading-cases 4/6
5/9/23, 6:20 PM Curative Petition Provisions and Leading cases - Law Insider India

Don’t want to g
Yes, It is possible to study

MORE STORIES

5 min read 9 min read 2 min read

COLUMNS COLUMNS COLUMNS

(https://www.lawinsider.in/category/columns) (https://www.lawinsider.in/category/columns) (https://www.lawinsider.in/category/columns)

Proclaimed Offender: Why Some TRENDING TRENDING

Fugitives Choose to Run (https://www.lawinsider.in/category/trending) (https://www.lawinsider.in/category/trending)
(https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/proclaimed-
Act Most Mercilessly With Most Major Provisions of The Registration
offender-why-some-fugitives- Merciless Terrorists Act, 1908
choose-to-run) (https://www.lawinsider.in/trending/act- (https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/major
 May 6, 2023 most-mercilessly-with-most- provisions-of-the-registration-act-
merciless-terrorists) 1908)
 May 6, 2023  April 14, 2023

Don’t want to g
Yes, It is possible to study

YOU MAY HAVE MISSED

8 min read 5 min read 1 min read 9 min read

NEWS COLUMNS NEWS COLUMNS

(https://www.lawinsider.in/category/news)
(https://www.lawinsider.in/category/columns)
(https://www.lawinsider.in/category/news)
(https://www.lawinsider.in/category

‘Gives Arbitrary Powers To Proclaimed Offender: Why TRENDING TRENDING

Police’: SC Upholds Some Fugitives Choose to (https://www.lawinsider.in/category/trending)
(https://www.lawinsider.in/category
Quashing of TN Decision Run Allahabad HC: Proclaimed Act Most Mercilessly With
To Constitute Anti-Land (https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/proclaimed-
Offender Not Barred From Most Merciless Terrorists
Grabbing Cell offender-why-some- Filing Anticipatory Bail (https://www.lawinsider.in/tren
(https://www.lawinsider.in/news/gives-
fugitives-choose-to-run) (https://www.lawinsider.in/trending/allahabad-
most-mercilessly-with-
arbitrary-powers-to- hc-proclaimed-offender- most-merciless-terrorists)
 May 6, 2023
police-sc-upholds- not-barred-from-filing-
About Law Insider (https://www.lawinsider.in/about-law-insider)
quashing-of-tn-decision-
 May 6, 2023 
anticipatory-bail)
Privacy Policy (https://www.lawinsider.in/privacy-policy-2)
Terms of Use (https://www.lawinsider.in/lawinsider-terms-of-use)

https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/curative-petition-provisions-and-leading-cases 5/6
5/9/23, 6:20 PM Curative Petition Provisions and Leading cases - Law Insider India
to-constitute-anti-land-
DMCA
 May(https://www.lawinsider.in/dmca)
6, 2023
grabbing-cell)
Disclaimer (https://www.lawinsider.in/disclaimer-and-condition-
to-use-law-insider-in)
 May 7, 2023
     
RSS Feed (https://www.lawinsider.in/feed/)
Advertise with Us (https://www.lawinsider.in/advertise-with-us)
Cancellation And Refund (https://www.lawinsider.in/cancellation-
and-refund)
Contact Us (https://www.lawinsider.in/contact-us)

Copyright © 2022 Law Insider Networks All rights reserved

https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/curative-petition-provisions-and-leading-cases 6/6