Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: A superior arsenite [As (III)] oxidizing strain was isolated by enrichment technique from a shallow aquifer of
Arsenic Bhojpur district, Bihar, India. Along with high As (III) and arsenate [As (V)] resistance [up to 70 mM of As (III)
Arsenite oxidizing bacteria and 1000 mM of As (V), respectively], it showed high resistance to multi-metals and a superior ability to utilize a
Groundwater wide range of carbon sources. The gram-negative rod-shaped strain of Delftia spp. BAs29 was characterized
Bioremediation
thoroughly for its As (III) oxidation ability. The strain showed mixed growth associated, facultative chemo-
Bio-sorbents
Bio-transformation
lithotrophic As (III) oxidation process, releasing-67 kJ/reaction of free energy in an exergonic reaction. Testing
of cost-effective and natural bio-sorbents showed efficient As (V) removal from the contaminated water. Moringa
oleifera showed the maximum As (V) removal capacity of 57.89% among the tested bio-sorbents. This study
revealed a two-step approach for arsenic removal with 98.77% efficiency from groundwater using an indigenous
As (III) oxidizing strain combined with a natural bio-sorbent.
1. Introduction (III) from contaminated water is difficult due to its high magnitude of
solubility, while As (V) can be easily removed by some conventional
Increased level of arsenic (As) is a threat to mankind, affecting physicochemical methods like filtration, adsorption, reverse osmosis,
millions of people every year worldwide (Paul et al., 2015). The middle membrane filtration, and coagulation etc. (Bahar et al., 2012). A two-
Gangetic plain, including several districts of Bihar and West Bengal, step approach can be adapted to remove total As, wherein the first step
seem to be the worst affected areas, affecting around 40 million people. involved is the oxidation of more toxic As (III) to As (V) and the next
In this region, total As concentration is much greater than the pre- step is associated with the use of adsorbents for the removal of oxidized
scribed limit (0.01 mg/l) by WHO (Chakraborti et al., 2003). Long-term As (V). The oxidation step requires toxic chemical oxidants like ozone,
exposure to toxic levels of As leads to skin cancer, loss of appetite, skin chlorine or hydrogen peroxide which either produce hazardous by-
itching and cardiac problems (Banerjee et al., 2011). Geochemical products or are expensive. Alternatively, microbes in their metabolic
weathering of rocks, anthropogenic activities and volcanic emissions processes use As (III) as an efficient energy source, aiding the process of
are the primary causes of groundwater As contamination. Geo-micro- reducing the groundwater toxicity (Kamaluddin et al., 2003). Many
bial ecotoxicology is gaining prime importance in the field of en- potential As (III) oxidizing bacteria including Bacillus cereus, Alcaligenes
vironmental science and research (Gu et al., 2013). Microbial bior- faecalis, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Rhizobium spp., Pseudomonas spp.,
emediation of As is quite effective and depends on the intrinsic action of Agrobacterium tumifaciens, Escherichia coli, Clostridium spp., Rumino-
microbial activity to transform, volatize, reduce, immobilize or mobi- coccaceae spp., Klebsiella oxytoca and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus have
lize As through redox reactions, sorption, complexation, and bio- been reported to withstand high concentrations of As and can sub-
methylation (Dai et al., 2016; Gu, 2018). stantially aid in the bioremediation of As from groundwater (Sarkar
As mainly exists in four different valences in the natural environ- et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2015; Tripti and Shardendu, 2017; Liu et al.,
ment; elemental arsenic (0), arsenine (-III), arsenite (III) and arsenate 2018; Dai et al., 2016). Arsenite oxidizers may be either heterotrophic
(V). Among these, As (III) and As (V) are the two most abundant forms i.e. they oxidize As (III) only as a mode of detoxification while the
in the environment; with As (III) being the more toxic and more mobile chemolithotrophic As (III) oxidizers gain energy during this process
form than its counterpart (Aitio and Becking, 2001). The removal of As (Oremland and Stolz, 2005). In prokaryotes, As (III) oxidation is
∗
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: rimi.biswas12@gmail.com (R. Biswas), vk7maurya@gmail.com (V. Vivekanand), animasaha.179@gmail.com (A. Saha),
ghosh51@hotmail.com (A. Ghosh), sarkara@nitrkl.ac.in, sarkar.angana@gmail.com (A. Sarkar).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.10.006
Received 31 May 2018; Received in revised form 12 October 2018; Accepted 12 October 2018
0964-8305/ © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
R. Biswas et al. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 136 (2019) 55–62
controlled by a periplasmic As (III) oxidase enzyme (Andreoni et al., of 7.1. For each sample, two different sterile polypropylene bottles were
2012). With respect to highly expensive and conventional As removal used. In one sample, nitric acid was added to avert the metal from
technologies which are ineffective for the removal of low As con- microbial degradation, adsorption and precipitation while the second
centration, extensive technological developments that are highly se- sample was kept at 4 °C on ice for further microbial analysis.
lective and economically competitive are strongly in demand. Since
natural microorganisms have intrinsic abilities to detoxify toxic As
species, it is of immense importance to identify and characterize such 2.2. Enrichment and isolation of As resistant bacteria
organisms and their As detoxification mechanisms.
Solid adsorbents are more popular in As (V) adsorption due to the Isolation of As resistant bacteria was done directly from the As
economic and technical limitations for the use of standard flocculation contaminated water as well as enriching it with As (III) (10 mM) and As
and precipitation methods. Activated -carbon, -alumina and -bauxite (V) (1 mM) for 7 days, 120 rpm at 30 °C (Sarkar et al., 2013). The initial
are some of the adsorbents used for the study of As removal from growth and enrichment of the strain was done in Reasoner's 2A (R2A)
aqueous solutions (Lim et al., 2014). Usage of natural adsorbents such agar medium under aerobic conditions at 30 °C. Throughout the in-
as leaves, sand, red mud etc., are gaining momentum, aiding the As cubation period, counting of the number of bacterial colony forming
removal process. They are highly impactful as they do not produce any units (CFU's) was done at definite time intervals. A morphologically
hazardous by-products and are cost effective. distinct isolate was selected based on its highest As resistance for fur-
Although a thorough geochemical characterization has been carried ther characterization. The isolate was purified by sub-culturing re-
out in the middle Gangetic plains of Bihar (Particularly, Bhojpur dis- peatedly in a suitable medium and stored at 80 °C a glycerol stock.
trict), the reports on the characterization of As transforming bacteria is
limited. As per our knowledge, this is the first time a thorough research
is elucidating a two-step approach of As removal, where a test strain is 2.3. Arsenic transformation screening assay
exploited to transform more mobile and toxic As (III) to its less toxic
and mobile form As (V), following its adsorption on eco-friendly and Determination of As (III) oxidation was done on a chemically de-
inexpensive natural bio-sorbents. This approach could be highly effi- fined agar media (CDM) amended with 10 mM sodium arsenite was
cient in the bioremediation of As, aiding significant contribution in the used as an electron donor while 5 mM sodium arsenate in the same
process of total As removal from any As contaminated groundwater. medium was used as an electron acceptor, along with 0.5% dextrose,
acting as a carbon source to determine the As (V) reduction ability of
2. Materials and methods the isolate. The plate was incubated aerobically for 72 h at 30 °C re-
spectively. Flooding the plate with 0.1M silver nitrate (AgNO3) fol-
2.1. Collection of samples and storage lowing bacterial growth resulted in the formation of colored precipitate
due to its reaction with As (III) and As (V). A brownish colored pre-
The water samples were collected in the early winter season from cipitate revealed the presence of silver arsenate (Ag3AsO4) due to the
two different As contaminated sites of Dubechaapra (25.6462670N, result of oxidation of As (III) to As (V) (Simeonova et al., 2004). Ar-
84.6742670E) and Gajiapur villages (25.6869780N, 84.6366080E) of senate concentration was measured using ammonium molybdate
Bhojpur district in Bihar lying in the middle Gangetic plains (Fig. 1). method (Dhar et al., 2004).
The inherent temperature of the groundwater samples was 25 °C at a pH
Fig. 1. Arsenic contaminated groundwater sample collection sites from Bhojpur district, Bihar, India.
56
R. Biswas et al. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 136 (2019) 55–62
2.4. Maximum tolerance concentration (MTC) assay for As and other blasted in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) da-
heavy metals tabase for getting the homology sequences. CLUSTALW multiple
alignments were done to align the retrieved sequences from the NCBI
The maximum tolerance concentration (MTC) was tested for the database along with the sequence of the test strain. Using neighbor-
isolate, using the agar dilution method for arsenic as well as for other joining method, the phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA-7
heavy metals (Sarkar et al., 2013). Graded concentrations of As salts, As (Kumar et al., 2008).
(III) (NaAsO2) or As (V) (Na2HAsO4.7H2O) were amended to the R2A
agar medium for MTC assay. They were further cultured in R2A media 2.8. Arsenate adsorption using natural bio-sorbents
amended with As [15–70 mM As (III) and 100–1000 mM As (V)].
Moreover, the highly As resistant strain was tested for diverse heavy Different bio-sorbents such as red mud, construction site sand,
metal resistance [ZnCl2, Cu(NO3).23H2O, NiCl2.6H2O, Cd(NO3).24H2O, Moringa oliefera (Drumstick leaves), Psidium guajava (Guava leaves),
HgCl2, and Cr(NO3)3], with varying concentrations of 2.5 mM–30 mM; Cocos nucifera coir (Coconut coir), Bambusoideae leaves (Bamboo
[Merck, Germany]. The strain was grown up to log phase and streaked leaves), sawdust and Sapindus mukorossi (Soap fruit) were used in order
on each metal amended plate followed by its incubation for 24 h - to develop a cost-effective and a natural adsorbent. The samples were
36 h at 30 °C. sun-dried and converted to powder form to increase the surface area for
adsorption. A test As (V) solution of 100 mM was prepared and 2 g each
2.5. Biochemical and physiological characterization of the collected natural adsorbents were added to the 10 ml of prepared
As (V) stock solution. The As (V) solutions with added adsorbents were
Gram staining was done using the standard Gram staining kit left undisturbed for a period of 15 days. After the incubation period, the
(Himedia, India). The cellular structure of the isolate was examined As (V) concentration in the adsorbents was measured using the mo-
under a bright field microscope. Morphological properties of the se- lybdenum blue complex formation. The experiment was conducted in
lected strain were characterized using Environmental Scanning Electron triplicates and the final As (V) concentrations were measured spectro-
Microscopy (ESEM, Quanta FEC 250, Pfeiffer, Netherland) in terms of scopically. Scanning electron microscopes coupled with energy-dis-
its appearance, colony size, surface texture, margin elevation and persive X-ray (SEM-EDX) was performed for the two adsorbents,
general surface structure. Following bacterial growth on R2A media, showing their maximum As (V) adsorption capacities.
temperature and pH sensitivity was monitored at different incubation
temperatures (4 °C - 42 °C) and varying pH (6–10). Standard carbohy- 2.9. Designing of a two-step approach for total As removal
drate discs (25 μg sugar/disk) and antibiotic discs (Himedia, India)
were used to test the capability of the bacterial strain to metabolize A two-step experiment was performed in batch condition involving
different carbon sources and to see the diverse antibiotic sensitivity of As (III) oxidizing Delftia spp. BAs29 as oxidizing agent and Moringa
the isolate in phenol red agar plates. The oxidative ability of the strain oliefera as bio-sorbent. In the first step, the strain was incubated over-
was tested using standard oxidase discs. Characterization of general night at 30 °C in 100 ml of groundwater containing 100 μM As (III) for
biochemical properties such as indole test, methyl red test, citrate uti- evaluating its oxidation ability. In second step, following As (III) oxi-
lization and Voges-Proskauer's test was done using manufacturer's dation, 2 g of Moringa oliefera was added to the same flask for studying
protocol (Himedia, India). Biofilm formation study was carried out by its adsorption efficiency. Arsenate concentration was finally measured
spectrophotometric method using dimethyl methylene blue (Pui et al., before and after each step using ammonium molybdate method in the
2017). effluent (Dhar et al., 2004). Bio-adsorption was further confirmed by
SEM-EDX analysis.
2.6. Stoichiometry of As (III) oxidation
2.10. Statistical analysis
Arsenite oxidation by the selected strain was observed during
growth of the strain in R2A medium. For studying the growth, the se- All the biological studies have been conducted using triplicate
lected strain was grown on R2A medium and incubated at 37 °C for sampling. The graphs have been represented only after statistical ana-
24 h. The samples were collected in triplicates for every 1 h and optical lysis. Two-way ANOVA analysis in OriginPro 8.5 has been performed
density was measured at 600 nm spectroscopically. Standard spectro- for data representation.
scopic assay of molybdenum blue complex formation was used to de-
termine the concentration of As (V) species in the supernatant (Dhar 3. Results and discussion
et al., 2004). The CFU count for bacterial growth and dry cell biomass
weight were also observed at specific time intervals, followed by stoi- 3.1. Isolation and screening of As (III) oxidizing bacteria
chiometry and mass balance estimations.
Initially, sixty-eight morphologically distinct bacterial strains were
2.7. DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis isolated from the As contaminated groundwater samples (Data not
shown). Finally, a highly superior As resistant strain BAs29 was chosen
Isolation of genomic DNA was done using the manufacturer's pro- for further characterization. Bacteria develop some detoxification me-
tocol (Himedia, India). Amplification of 16S rRNA gene was done using chanisms to overcome the growth restriction when under selective
the genomic DNA of the test strain as a template and 27F (5′-AGAGT stress such as high concentration of As for a prolonged period of time
TTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGA- (Huang et al., 2010). Members of Proteobacteria, such as Hydro-
CTT-3′) as universal primers. PCR was performed with an initial step of genophaga and Acidovorax have been identified previously in the con-
denaturation for 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at taminated groundwater of the region, revealing the high As tolerance
the same temperature, annealing at 52 °C for 50 s and elongation at nature of these bacteria (Ghosh et al., 2014).
72 °C for 1.5 min, respectively with a concluding extension step of
10 min at 72 °C. PCR amplified products were purified using Genetix 3.2. Arsenic and other heavy metal tolerance by the selected strain
Gel Extraction Kit (Genetix Biotech Asia Pvt. Ltd., India) followed by
sequencing of 16S rRNA gene from Eurofins sequencing service Silver nitrate screening assay revealed As (III) oxidizing nature of
(Eurofins Genomics India Pvt Ltd., Bangalore, India). After sequencing, the strain BAs29. The strain also showed high resistance to As (III) and
the sequences were processed using BioEdit tool (BioEdit v7.0.5) and As (V) up to 70 mM and 1000 mM. It was further studied for its multi-
57
R. Biswas et al. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 136 (2019) 55–62
58
R. Biswas et al. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 136 (2019) 55–62
Fig. 2. As (III) oxidation potential of the strain BAs29 (a), Lineweaver Burke plot for estimation of kinetic parameters Km and Vmax (b), Luedeking-Piret model for
product formation kinetics (c). Data points are the average of three independent experiments.
59
R. Biswas et al. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 136 (2019) 55–62
60
R. Biswas et al. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 136 (2019) 55–62
Fig. 4. Percentage (%) As (V) removal by different adsorbents (a); SEM images of Moringa oleifera before and after As (V) adsorption (b & c); EDX images of Moringa
oleifera before and after As (V) adsorption (d & e).
which indicated an effective As removal efficiency of 98.77% from the Conflicts of interest
groundwater system (Fig. 5).
All the authors of this manuscript declare that there is no conflict of
interest regarding the manuscript submission in the journal of”
4. Conclusion
International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation”.
The current study reveals the first detailed characterization of As
(III) oxidation by Delftia spp. BAs29 in the middle Gangetic plains of
Acknowledgment
Bihar. This strain showed mixed growth associated, facultative che-
molithotrophic nature of As (III) oxidation wherein As (III) and glucose
The authors would like to thank the Department of Science and
were used as the sole electron donor and carbon source respectively, in
Technology, Government of India for providing financial support to the
an exergonic reaction. Besides oxidizing As (III) into less toxic As (V), it
research work (Sanction Order: YSS/2015/001911). We would also like
also showed high multi-metal resistance along with diverse carbon
to express our appreciation to National Institute of Technology,
source utilization, indicating its potential application in various metal
Rourkela for providing conducing laboratory facilities to proceed with
contaminated sites. Maximum As (V) adsorption by Moringa oleifera
the work. The generous help of Prof. Ashok Ghosh during the collection
revealed its suitable utilization in designing of a two-step approach for
of arsenic contaminated water sample from Bhojpur, Bihar is highly
the removal of total As. Hence, Delftia spp. BAs29 along with Moringa
acknowledged.
oleifera will contribute significantly in designing an eco-friendly, cost-
effective in situ bioremediation technology for As contaminated en-
vironments.
61
R. Biswas et al. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 136 (2019) 55–62
Huang, A., Teplitski, M., Rathinasabapathi, B., Ma, L., 2010. Characterization of arsenic-
resistant bacteria from the rhizosphere of arsenic hyperaccumulator Pterisvittata. Can.
J. Microbiol. 56, 236–246.
Jorgensen, N.O., Brandt, K.K., Nybroe, O., Hansen, M., 2009. Delftia lacustris sp. nov., a
peptidoglycan-degrading bacterium from fresh water, and emended description of
Delftia tsuruhatensis as a peptidoglycan-degrading bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol.
Microbiol. 59, 2195–2199.
Juárez-Jiménez, B., Manzanera, M., Rodelas, B., Martínez-Toledo, M.V., Gonzalez-López,
J., Crognale, S., Pesciaroli, C., Fenice, M., 2010. Metabolic characterization of a strain
(BM90) of Delftia tsuruhatensis showing highly diversified capacity to degrade low
molecular weight phenols. Biodegradation 21, 475–489.
Kamaluddin, S.P., Arunkumar, S., Ramasamy, K., 2003. Bioremediation of chromium
contaminated environments. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 41, 972–985.
Kinegam, S., Yingprasertchai, T., Tanasupawat, S., Leepipatpiboon, N., Akaracharanya,
A., Kim, K.W., 2008. Isolation and characterization of arsenite-oxidizing bacteria
from arsenic-contaminated soils in Thailand. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24,
3091–3096.
Koechler, S., Cleiss-Arnold, J., Proux, C., Sismeiro, O., Dillies, M.A., Goulhen-Chollet, F.,
Hommais, F., Lièvremont, D., Arsène-Ploetze, F., Coppée, J.Y., Bertin, P.N., 2010.
Multiple controls affect arsenite oxidase gene expression in Herminiimonas arseni-
coxydans. BMC Microbiol. 10, 53.
Kumar, S., Dudley, J., Nei, M., Tamura, K., 2008. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for
evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Briefings Bioinf. 9, 299–306.
Lim, K.T., Shukor, M.Y., Wasoh, H., 2014. Physical, chemical, and biological methods for
the removal of arsenic compounds. BioMed Res. Int. 9–16.
Liu, F., Guoping, Z., Shirong, L., Zhiping, F., Jingjing, C., Chao, M., 2018. Bioremoval of
Fig. 5. Two-step approach of As (V) removal using Strain BAs29 and Moringa
arsenic and antimony from wastewater by a mixed culture of sulfate-reducing bac-
oleifera. teria using lactate and ethanol as carbon sources. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 126,
152–159.
Marchal, M., Briandet, R., Koechler, S., Kammerer, B., Bertin, P.N., 2010. Effect of ar-
Appendix A. Supplementary data senite on swimming motility delays surface colonization in Herminiimona sarseni-
coxydans. Microbiology 156, 2336–2342.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https:// Marchal, M., Briandet, R., Halter, D., Koechler, S., DuBow, M.S., Lett, M.C., Bertin, P.N.,
2011. Subinhibitory arsenite concentrations lead to population dispersal in
doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.10.006. Thiomonas sp. PLoS One 6, 23181.
Martin, A.J., Pedersen, R.F., 2004. Alteration to lake trophic status as a means to control
References arsenic mobility in a mine-impacted lake. Water Res. 381, 4415–4423.
Mohan, D., Pittman, C.U.J., 2007. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using ad-
sorbents – a critical review. J. Hazard Mater. 142, 1–53.
Aitio, A., Becking, G., 2001. Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds. Environmental Health Oremland, R.S., Stolz, J.F., 2003. The ecology of arsenic. Science 300, 939–944.
Criteria, vol. 224 World Health Organization, Geneva. Oremland, R.S., Stolz, J.F., 2005. Arsenic, microbes and contaminated aquifers. Trends
Andreoni, V., Zanchi, R., Cavalca, L., Romagnoli, C., Canzi, E., 2012. Arsenite oxidation in Microbiol. 13, 45–49.
ancylobacter dichloromehanicus As31-1b strain: detection of genes involved in arsenite Paul, D., Kazy, S.K., Banerjee, T.D., Gupta, A.K., Pal, T., Sar, P., 2015. Arsenic bio-
oxidation and CO2 fixation. Curr. Microbiol. 65, 212–218. transformation and release by bacteria indigenous to arsenic contaminated ground-
Anwanyu, C.U., Ugwul, C.E., 2010. Incidence of arsenic resistant bacteria isolated from a water. Bioresour. Technol. 188, 14–23.
sewage treatment plant. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 10, 64–78. Prakash, D., Pandey, J., Tiwary, B.N., Jain, R., 2010. Physiological adaptations and tol-
Asif, Z., Chen, Z., 2017. Removal of arsenic from drinking water using rice husk. Appl. erance towards higher concentration of selenite (Se+4) in Enterobacter sp. AR-4,
Water Sci. 7, 1449–1458. Bacillus sp. AR-6 and Delftia tsuruhatensis Ar-7. Extremophiles 14, 261–272.
Bahar, M.M., Megharaj, M., Naidu, R., 2012. Arsenic bioremediation potential of a new- Pui, C.F., Apun, K., Jalan, J., Bilung, L.M., Suut, L., Hashim, H.F., 2017. Microtitre plate
arsenite oxidizing bacterium Stenotrophomonas sp. MM-7 isolated from soil. Assay for the quantification of biofilm formation by pathogenic leptospira.
Biodegradation 23, 803–812. Microbiology 12, 146–153.
Baig, S.A., Sheng, T., Hu, Y., Xu, J., Xu, X., 2015. Arsenic removal from natural water Salim, R., Al-Subu, M., Abu-Shqair, I., Braik, H., 2003. Removal of zinc from aqueous
using low cost granulated adsorbents: a review. Clean. - Soil, Air, Water 43, 13–26. solutions by dry plant leaves. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 81, 236–242.
Banerjee, S., Datta, S., Chattyopadhyay, D., Sarkar, P., 2011. Arsenic accumulating and Santini, J.M., Sly, L.I., Schnagl, R.D., Macy, J.M., 2000. A new chemolithoautotrophic
transforming bacteria isolated from contaminated soil for potential use in bior- arsenite-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a gold mine: phylogenetic, physiological,
emediation. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 46, 1736–1747. and preliminary biochemical studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 92–97.
Butt, A.S., Rehman, A., 2011. Isolation of arsenite-oxidizing bacteria from industrial ef- Sanyal, S.K., Mou, T.J., Chakrabarty, R.P., Hoque, S., Hossain, M.A., Sultana, M., 2016.
fluents and their potential use in wastewater treatment. World J. Microbiol. Diversity of arsenite oxidase gene and arsenotrophic bacteria in arsenic affected
Biotechnol. 27, 2435–2441. Bangladesh soils. Amb. Express 6, 21.
Cai, L., Liu, G.H., Rensing, C., Wang, G., 2009. Genes involved in arsenic transformation Sarkar, A., Kazy, S.K., Sar, P., 2013. Characterization of arsenic resistant bacteria from
and resistance associated with different levels of arsenic-contaminated soils. BMC arsenic rich groundwater of West Bengal, India. Ecotoxicology 22, 363–376.
Microbiol. 9, 4. Sarkar, A., Kazy, S.K., Sar, P., 2014. Studies on arsenic transforming groundwater bacteria
Chakraborti, D., Mukherjee, S.C., Pati, S., Sengupta, M.K., Rahman, M.M., Chowdhury, and their role in arsenic release from subsurface sediment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
U.K., Lodh, D., Chanda, C.R., Chakraborti, A.K., Basu, G.K., 2003. Arsenic ground- Int. 14, 8645–8662.
water contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger? Environ. Simeonova, D.D., Lievremont, D., Lagarde, F., Muller, D.A.E., Groudeva, V.I., Lett, M.C.,
Health Perspect. 111, 1194–1201. 2004. Microplate screening assay for the detection of arsenite-oxidizing and arsenate-
Dai, X., Ping, L., Jin, T., Rui, Z., Dazhuni, W., Bing, L., Yanhong, W., Zhou, J., 2016. reducing bacteria. FEMS (Fed. Eur. Microbiol. Soc.) Microbiol. Lett. 237, 249–253.
Evidence of arsenic mobilization mediated by an indigenous iron reducing bacterium Sinha, S., Amy, G., Yoon, Y., Her, N., 2011. Arsenic removal from water using various
from high arsenic groundwater aquifer in Hetao Basin of Inner Mongolia, China. Int. adsorbents: magnetic ion exchange resins, hydrous ion oxide particles, granular ferric
Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 128, 22–27. hydroxide, activated alumina, sulfur modified iron, and iron oxide-coated microsand.
Dhar, R.K., Zheing, Y., Rubenstone, J., Geen, A.V., 2004. A rapid colorimetric method for Environ. Eng. Res. 16, 165–173.
measuring arsenic concentrations in groundwater. Anal. Chim. Acta 526, 203–209. Sultana, M., Vogler, S., Zargar, K., Schmidt, A.C., Saltikov, C., Seifert, J., Schlömann, M.,
Eguez, H.E., Cho, E.H., 1987. Adsorption of arsenic on activated charcoal. JOM (J. Occup. 2012. New clusters of arsenite oxidase and unusual bacterial groups in enrichments
Med.) 39, 38–41. from arsenic-contaminated soil. Archiev. Microbiol. 194, 623–635.
Ghosh, D., Bhadury, P., Routh, J., 2014. Diversity of arsenite oxidizing bacterial com- Tripti, K., Shardendu, 2017. Arsenic removing soil indigenous bacteria of hyper arsenic
munities in arsenic-rich deltaic aquifers in West Bengal, India. Front. Microbiol. 5, contaminated region in Bihar. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India B Biol. Sci. 1–9.
602. Ubalde, M.C., Braña, V., Sueiro, F., Morel, M.A., Martínez-Rosales, C., Marquez, C.,
Gu, J.D., 2018. Mining, pollution and site remediation. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. Castro-Sowinski, S., 2012. The versatility of Delftia sp. isolates as tools for bior-
128, 1–2. emediation and biofertilization technologies. Curr. Microbiol. 64, 597–603.
Gu, J.D., Wang, Y., 2013. A new era for geomicrobial ecotoxicology in environmental Wu, W., Huang, H., Ling, Z., Yu, Z., Jiang, Y., Liu, P., Li, X., 2016. Genome sequencing
science research. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 76, 1–2. reveals mechanisms for heavy metal resistance and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
Hoeft, S.E., Switzer Blum, J.I., Stolz, J.F., Tabita, F.R., Witte, B., King, G.M., Santini, J.M., degradation in Delftia lacustris strain LZ-C. Ecotoxicology 25, 234–247.
Oremland, R.S., 2007. Alkalilimnicola ehrlichii sp. nov., a novel, arsenite-oxidizing Xiong, C., Jia, Q., Chen, X., Wang, G., Yao, C., 2013. Optimization of polyacrylonitrile-2-
haloalkaliphilic gammaproteobacterium capable of hemoautotrophic or hetero- aminothiazole resin synthesis, characterization, and its adsorption performance and
trophic growth with nitrate or oxygen as the electron acceptor. Int. J. Syst. Evol. mechanism for removal of Hg (II) from aqueous solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52,
Microbiol. 57, 504–512. 4978–4986.
62