c8h0vm0000f4lwhr PDF

Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
Consulting Services for the Detailed Design and Tender Assistance

of
The Davao City Bypass Construction Project
(South and Center Sections)
(LA No. PH-P261)
UPDATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
（EIS）
February 2018
Joint Venture of:
In Association with:
Updated Environmental Impact Statement
For Davao Bypass Construction Project (South and Center Sections)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................... 5

1.1 Objective of Updating Environmental Impact Statement ............................................ 5
1.2 Implementation Organization of Environmental Impact Assessment .......................... 5
1.3 Project Outline ............................................................................................................. 5
1.4 Target of Updated EIS ................................................................................................ 20
CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL
FRAMEWORK ............................................................................ 23
2.1 Policy of Environmental and Social Considerations.................................................. 23
2.2 Institutional Framework ............................................................................................. 24
CHAPTER 3: BASELINE NATURAL AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 26
3.1 Physical Natural and Social Enviromental Conditions .............................................. 26
3.2 People ......................................................................................................................... 34
CHAPTER 4: UPDATED ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 37
4.1 Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ............................................ 37
CHAPTER 5: UPDATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........ 41
5.1 Updated Mitigation Measures .................................................................................... 41
5.2 Updated Monitoring Plan ........................................................................................... 48
CHAPTER 6: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN .............................................. 58
6.1 Social Development Plan ........................................................................................... 58
Attachments:
Attachment-1: List of Flora recorded by Preparatory Survey for South Mindanao Economic
Corridor Improvement (Davao City Bypass Construction Project) (JICA
February 2015)
Attachment-2: List of Fauna recorded by Preparatory Survey for South Mindanao Economic
Corridor Improvement (Davao City Bypass Construction Project) (JICA
February 2015)
i
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.3-1 Project Outline Designed in FS 2014 ................................................................... 5

Table 1.3-2 Project Outline Modified in DED ...................................................................... 6
Table 1.3-3 Major Modification of Package I Design ........................................................... 6
Table 1.3-4 Latest Description of the Project ...................................................................... 11
Table 1.3-5 Outline of River Works .................................................................................... 17
Table 1.3-6 Outline of Candidate Disposal Sites................................................................. 18
Table 1.3-7 Outline of Construction Methods of the Project .............................................. 19
Table 1.4-1 Project Area ...................................................................................................... 20
Table 2.1-1 Major Laws and Regulations on Environmental Conservation related to
the Project ......................................................................................................... 23
Table 2.2-1 Responsibilities of the Relevant Parties at Each Stage .................................... 24
Table 3.1-1 Summary of Land Use in the Project Area ....................................................... 26
Table 3.1-2 Summary of Air Quality Conditions in the Project Area ................................. 33
Table 3.1-3 Summary of Noise Conditions in the Project Area .......................................... 33
Table 3.1-4 Summary of Water Quality in the Project Area ................................................ 33
Table 3.1-5 Freshwater Fish in the Project Area ................................................................. 34
Table 3.2-1 Population Distribution in Davao City ............................................................. 35
Table 3.2-2 Educational Attainment in Davao City in 2010 ............................................... 35
Table 3.2-3 Water Supply System in the Project Area ........................................................ 36
Table 4.1-1 Planned Project Activities at Each Project Stage ............................................. 37
Table 4.1-2 Updated Summary of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ............. 37
Table 5.1-1 Summary of Identified Potential Negative Impact and Mitigation
Measures at the Pre-Construction Stage........................................................... 42
Measures at the Construction Stage ................................................................. 43
Table 5.1-3 Summary of Identified Potential Impact and Mitigation Measures at the
Demobilization/ Decommissioning Stage .エラー! ブックマークが定義され
ていません。
Measures at the Operation Stage ...................................................................... 46
Table 5.2-1 Frequency and Locations of Environmental Monitoring at Pre-
Construction Stage ........................................................................................... 48
Table 5.2-2 Frequency and Locations of Environmental Monitoring at Construction
Stage ................................................................................................................. 49
Table 5.2-3 Frequency and Locations of Environmental Monitoring at Operation
Stage ................................................................................................................. 56
Table 6.1-1 Social Development Plan ................................................................................. 59
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.3-1 Sections of Shifting Alignment .......................................................................... 10

Figure 1.3-2 Typical Cross Section of Embankment and Cut............................................... 14
Figure 1.3-3 Typical Cross Section of Divided Road Section .............................................. 14
Figure 1.3-4 Typical Cross Section of MSE Section ............................................................ 15
Figure 1.3-5 Typical Cross Section of Toll Plaza.................................................................. 15
Figure 1.3-6 Typical Cross Section of 2 Lane Bridge ........................................................... 15
Figure 1.3-7 Typical Cross Section of 4 Lane Bridge ........................................................... 16
ii
Figure 1.3-8 Typical Cross Section of Overpass Bridge ....................................................... 16

Figure 1.3-9 Typical Cross Section of Ramp Bridge ............................................................ 16
Figure 1.3-10 Typical Cross Section of Tunnel ...................................................................... 16
Figure 1.3-11 Typical Cross Section of Cut & Cover Tunnel-1 ............................................. 17
Figure 1.3-12 Typical Cross Section of Cut & Cover Tunnel-2 ............................................. 17
Figure 1.4-1 Target Area of Updated EIS.............................................................................. 22
Figure 2.2-1 Organizational Structure to Impelemnt Environmental Management for
the Project ......................................................................................................... 25
Figure 3.1-1 Land Use Map of Davao City (2013-2022) ...................................................... 27
Figure 3.1-2 Topographical and Geological Condition in the Projec Area ........................... 28
Figure 3.1-3 Watersheds in the Projec Area .......................................................................... 29
Figure 3.1-4 Flora and Fauna Survey Sites at the Original EIS ............................................ 30
Figure 3.1-5 Site Measurment Points at the Original EIS Time............................................ 32
iii
ACRONYMS
BC Before Construction Stage

CDA Cooperative Development Authority
CENRO City Environment and Natural Resources Office
CS Construction Stage
ECC Environmental Compliance Certificate
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EMP Environmental Management Plan
ESSD Environmental and Social Safeguard Division of DWPH
DAO Department of Agrarian Reform
DCWD Davao City Water District
DED Detailed Engineering Design
DENR Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Environmental
DENR-EMB
Management Bureau
DEO District Engineering Office, DPWH
DLPC Davao Light and Power Company
DPWH Department of Public Works and Highways
DS Demobilization/Decommission Stage
DTI Department of Trade Industry
DSWD Department of Social Welfare Development
ECA Environmentally Critical Areas
EMP Environmental Management Plan
FS Feasibility Study
GOP Government of the Philippines
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
LGUs Local Government Units
MMT Multi-Partite Monitoring Team
NATM New Australian Tunneling Method
NHA National Housing Authority
NK-JV Nippon Koei-Joint Venture
OCPDC Office of the City Planning and Development Coordinator
OS Operation Stage
PD Presidential Decree
PO People’s Organization
RA Republic Act
RAP Resettlement Action Plan
PNP Philippine National Police
ROW Right of Way
SAFDZ Strategic Agriculture and Fisheries Development Zone
TESDA Technical Education and Development Agency
UMPO-RMC1 Road Management Cluster 1, Unified Project Management Office of DPWH
iv
CHAPTER 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1 Objective of Updating Environmental Impact Statement

Davao Bypass Construction Project travers approximately 45 km in total, and is composed of the 2
packages. Package I is composed of 2 sections (i.e. South and Center sections) and Package II is
composed of 1 section (i.e. North sections).
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the entire alignment of Davao Bypass Construction Project
(the Original EIS) was prepared as a part of the Preparatory Survey for South Mindanao Economic
Corridor Improvement conducted by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in 2014 to 2015
(JICA FS). Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) to the entire stretch was issued by Department
of Environmental and Natural Resources (DENR) on 22 September 2015 (ref. no. ECC-CO-1503-007).
Detailed Engineering Design (DED) was conducted for Package I (the Project) since February 2017,
and alignment at some sections in the Project was reviewed and shifted based on the results of technical
survey and consultation with stakeholders and surrounding communities. Accordingly, evaluation of
possible environmental and social impact to be caused by implementing the Project was updated based
on the latest project description.
1.2 Implementation Organization of Environmental Impact Assessment

EIS report to the entire alignment was prepared by ECOSYSCORP, INC. during JICA FS, and update
works for the Project portion was conducted by Nippon Koei-Joint Venture (NK-JV), Katahira and
Engineers International, Nippon Engineering Consultants Co., Ltd. in association with Philkoei
International, Inc.(PKII).
1.3 Project Outline

(1) Project Outline
Davao Bypass Construction Project for the whole alignment planned in JICA FS was shown in Table
1.3-1.
Table 1.3-1 Project Outline Designed in FS 2014

Package I Package II Total
Section 1 (South) Section 2 (Center) Section 3 (North)
Length (km) 11.7 17.1 15.8 44.6
Finance To be financed by To be financed by To be financed by
JICA Loan JICA Loan Government of the
Philippines (GOP)
Source: NK-JV
5
Package I was modified in this DED as shown in Table 1.3-2.
Table 1.3-2 Project Outline Modified in DED

Package I (South and Center) Package II (North) Total
I-1 I-2 I-3 Section 3
Length (km) 10.7 12.8 6.1 15.8* 45.4*
Finance Under To be financed Under To be financed by
examination by JICA Loan examination GOP
Note: DED for Package II is not yet commenced. Thus, length of Package II is tentatively set as same as the one in JICA FS.
Source: NK-JV
(2) Modification of Project Description from JICA FS
Table 1.3-3 and Figure 1.3-1 show major modification from JICA FS.
Table 1.3-3 Major Modification of Package I Design

Structure Design Item JICA FS (2014) Detailed Design (2017/2018)
Highway Width of
3.5 m 3.35 m
Carriageway
Maximum Gradient Flat, Rolling/Mountainous
Taking 30-35% of the truck and trailer
6% traffic on the Project road into
consideration, the maximum grade of
5% be applied.
Main Road Required Portland Cement Concrete
Type of Pavement PCCP Pavements with Dowel Bars at Contract
T=300mm Joints
Base T=300mm Crushed Aggregate Base Course
Right of Way (ROW) Vary approximately 40-100m
Main Road depending on cross section design.
100m ROW is required at high
60m
embankment sections.
Existing ROW except improvement
sections.
Bridges Structural Design Design Guidelines, Criteria and Design Guidelines, Criteria and
Standards Standards of the Department of Public Standards of the Department of Public
Works and Highways (1984) Works and Highways (2015)
Left Shoulder 0.16 m 0.31 m
Right Shoulder 0.16 m 0.31 m
Preliminary Design Section-1: 6-Bridges & 3-Overpass
of Bridge Structure Section-1: 10-Bridges & 2-Overpasses
Section-2: 6-Bridges & 3-Overpass, 2-
Section-2: 14-Bridges & 4-Overpass
Ramp bridges
Preliminary Design Section-1: 16-Culverts for river Section-1: 22-Culverts for river
of Culvert Structure
Section-2: 16-Culvert for river & 3- Section-2: 25-Culvert for river & 3-
Culvers for crossing road Culvers for crossing road
Vertical Clearance 5.0 m 5.03 m
Tunnel Traffic and One main tunnel of two-way traffic + Two tube tunnels with same section area
Evacuation Evacuation tunnel. are applied.
Tunnel Alignment The alignment is planned mainly for one - The realignment plan has been
main tunnel. conducted for the applied two tube
tunnel plan.
6
Tunnel profile The long and high bridge is applied to - The tunnel elevation is planned lower
approach the tunnel. than PS.
Typical Cross The typical cross section for 2-way - The typical cross section for one way
Section traffic tunnel for main tunnel is applied. traffic is applied for two main tube
tunnel.
Interval of Crossing The interval, 350m, for two-way traffic - The interval, 750m, for one way traffic
passage is applied. is applied.
Interval of The interval, 350m, for two-way traffic - The interval, 750m, for one way traffic
Emergency parking is applied. is applied.
lane
Source: NK-JV
7
Total 5 Sections of Alighment Shifting (General)
Alighnemnt at 5 sections in total was shifted from the one proposed during JICA FS due to technical
and social viewpoints.
1. Station 8+400
The proposed alignment at JICA FS passed through the two (2) sub-division development areas. The
aligment was shifted to the border of both sub-division development.
8
2. Station 9+200 to 10+000
The proposed alignment at JICA FS run adjacent to the new structure (30m x 40m) belong to Welfare
Department of Region XI. Accordingly, it was shifted 20 meters to the right to avoid the structure.
3. Station 12+100
LEGEND:
Original Route in JICA FS
Proposed Route of Land

Owner (Original)
Area of Garden
requested to avoid
Pylon
Shift of
Pylon Alignment by
Cemetery
100-110m
Mini-Hydro Power Plant
Mini-Hydro Power Plant
The proposed alignment atRealignment Proposal of Land Owner (Dakudau-Locsin Property)

JICA FS around Station 12+100 (Davao-Bukidnon Road Intersection) was
shifted considering plea for reservation of the Davao Ancestral Heritage Property.
9
4. Station 24+000
The proposed alignment at JICA FS was passed inside the new subdivision development, and it was
shifted to northern side to avoid new subdivision development.
5. Station 28+400
The proposed alignment at JICA FS was shifted to the right side to avoid new subdivision
development.
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-1 Sections of Shifting Alignment
10
(3) Latest Project Description
The latest Project description incorporating modification from JICA FS is shown in Table 1.3-4.
Table 1.3-4 Latest Description of the Project

No. Item Package 1-2 Package 1-1 Package 1-3
STA 0+000, General Santos STA 12+800.0, Mintal Road STA 23+500.0, Mandug
1 Starting Point
Road Road
STA 12+800.0, Mintal Road STA 23+500.0, Mandug STA 29+600.0, Malagamot
2 Ending Point
Road Road
3 Length 12.8 km 10.7 km 6.1 km
4 Road Class National Road: Primary National Road: Primary National Road: Primary
5 Design Speed 60 km/hr 60 km/hr 60 km/hr
Four (4) lanes: Main Four (4) lanes: Main Four (4) lanes: Main
6 Nos. of Lanes
Carriageway Carriageway Carriageway
Main Road: 21.4m Main Road: 21.4m
Main Road: 21.4m
7 Road Width Bridge: 7.32m@2 Bridge: 7.32m@2
Bridge: 7.32m@2
Tunnel: 7.70m@2 BOX: 7.70m@2
Main Road: Main Road:
Main Road: 2.5+2@3.35+0.5+2.0+0.5+2 2.5+2@3.35+0.5+2.0+0.5+2
2.5+2@3.35+0.5+2.0+0.5+2 @3.35+2.5 @3.35+2.5
8 Cross Section @3.35+2.5 Bridge: Bridge:
Bridge: (0.31+2@3.35+0.31)@2 (0.31+2@3.35+0.31)@2
(0.31+2@3.35+0.31)@2 Tunnel: Cut & Cover Tunnel:
(0.50+2@3.35+0.50)@2 (0.50+2@3.35+0.50)@2
- Carriageway : 4@3.35 m
Elements - 4@3.35 m = 13.4 m - 4@3.35 m = 13.4 m
= 13.4 m
- Shoulder (out) :
2@2.5 m = 5.0 m - 2@2.5 m = 5.0 m - 2@2.5 m = 5.0 m
- Shoulder (in) : - 2@0.5 m = 1.0 m - 2@0.5 m = 1.0 m
2@0.5 m = 1.0 m
- Median : 1@2.0 m
- 1@2.0 m = 2.0 m - 1@2.0 m = 2.0 m
= 2.0 m
- Barrier : 2@2.0 m
- 2@2.0 m = 4.0 m - 2@2.0 m = 4.0 m
= 4.0 m
Interchange, One (1) interchange & Three (3) intersections & Three (3) intersections & One
Intersections, Sixteen (16) Two (2) overpasses & (1) overpasses
Ramp Bridge, intersections & Three Two (2) box culvert &
Overpasses, (3) overpasses & One Toll gate
9 Box culvert, (1) box culvert
Tunnel
Operation
Control center
and Toll Gate
Intersection-1: STA 0+000
Intersection-17: STA 12+825 Intersection-20: STA 23+500
11

- Signal with 4 directions - Signal with 4 directions - Signal with 4 directions
Overpass-1: STA 3+814 Overpass-4: STA 17+385 Overpass-6: STA 27+859
- Bridge type: PC flat slab - Bridge type: PC flat slab - Bridge type: PC flat slab
- L = 50 m, W = 9.54 m - L = 50 m, W = 9.54 m - L = 60 m, W = 9.54 m
Overpass-2: STA 5+668 Overpass-5: STA 18+890 -
- Bridge type: PC flat slab - Bridge type: PC flat slab

-
- L = 60 m, W = 9.54 m - L = 60 m, W = 9.54 m
Overpass-3: STA 9+049 Box culvert-2: STA 22+370

- Bridge type: PC flat slab
L = 32.5 m, W=9.7m
- L = 50 m, W = 9.54 m
Tunnel Operation Control
Box culvert-1: STA 2+034
Center: STA 21+600
L = 34 m, W=6.0m - Operation Control Center
- Maintenance Building
- Emergency Car Building
- Substation-3
- Fire Pump, tank
- Intake chamber
- Parking space
Interchange: STA 12+120 Toll Gate: STA 22+700
- Ramp-A
- 6 lanes with 7 booths,
- Bridge type: PSCG
management office building
- L = 110m,, W = 7.67m
- Ramp-B
- Bridge type: PSCG
- L = 110m,, W = 7.67m
10 Bridges Total Length: 1,065 m Total Length: 870 m
Matina River Bridge 1
Creek 5 Bridge (STA 1+850)
(Southbound) (STA 18+427)
- 5 spans PSCG - 7 spans PSCG
- L=165m, W=9.54m - L=260m, W=8.84m
- Single column pier - Single column pier
- Sinso Caisson foundation - Sinso Caisson foundation
Bayabass Creek Bridge 1
- Bored Pile foundation
(STA 2+490)
- 4 spans PSCG
(Northbound) (STA 18+427)
- L=140m, W=9.54m - 7 spans PSCG
- Single column pier - L=270m, W=8.84m
- Sinso Caisson foundation - Single column pier
- Bored Pile foundation - Sinso Caisson foundation
Bayabass Creek Bridge 2
(STA 2+730)
- 3 spans PSCG
- L=120m, W=9.54m - 2 spans PSCG
- Single column pier - L=70m, W=8.84m
- Bored Pile foundation - Bored Pile foundation
Lubogan River Bridge (STA Matina River Bridge 2
4+955) (Northbound) (STA 18+915)
- 4 spans PSCG - 2 spans PSCG
12
- L=150m, W=9.54m - L=70m, W=8.84m

- Single column pier - Bored Pile foundation
Davao River Bridge (STA
- Sinso Caisson foundation
22+925)
- Bored Pile foundation - 5 spans PSCG
Lipadas River Bridge (STA
- L=200m, W=9.54m
6+139)
- 3 spans PSCG - Bored Pile foundation
- L=87.5m, W=9.54m
- Single column pier
Talomo River Bridge 1
- 3 spans PSCG
- L=87.5m, W=8.84m
Talomo River Bridge 1
(Northbound) (STA 11+601)
- 3 spans PSCG
- L=87.5m, W=8.84m
Davao Bukidnon Flyover
(STA 12+080)
- 3 spans PSCG
- L=87.5m, W=9.54m
- Wall type pier
Talomo River Bridge 2 (STA
12+271)
- 4 spans PSCG
- L=140m, W=9.54m
Cut & Cover Tunnel – 1

NATM
Structure: Twin Box
Southbound: 19+172 -
25+320 - 25+530, L=210m
11 Tunnel 21+421, L=2,249m
Cut & Cover Tunnel – 2
Northbound: 19+160 –
Structure: Twin Box
21+400, L=2,240m
25+820 - 25+950, L=130m
12 Pavement Bridge Deck Tunnel Main Road
Structure PSCG - Subbase 300 mm - Subbase 200 mm
- Concrete Pavement 330 - Concrete Pavement 300
- Coarse 50mm
mm mm
Toll Gate
- Subbase 250 mm + Base
-
100 mm
- Concrete Pavement 30
mm
drainage system, power supply system, road lighting system, obstruction lights,
communication system, firefighting system, ventilation system, water supply system,
Auxiliary
13 wastewater treatment system, bridge bearings, expansion joints, navigation signs, road signs,
works
road markings, inspection access, monitoring system, supports for water pipes & telecom
fibers, signals, etc.
Source: NK-JV
13
Embankment Section
Cut Section
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-2 Typical Cross Section of Embankment and Cut
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-3 Typical Cross Section of Divided Road Section
14
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-4 Typical Cross Section of MSE Section
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-5 Typical Cross Section of Toll Plaza
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-6 Typical Cross Section of 2 Lane Bridge
15
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-7 Typical Cross Section of 4 Lane Bridge
Source: NK-JV
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-8 Typical Cross Section of Figure 1.3-9 Typical Cross Section of
Overpass Bridge Ramp Bridge
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-10 Typical Cross Section of Tunnel
16
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-11 Typical Cross Section of Cut & Cover Tunnel-1
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.3-12 Typical Cross Section of Cut & Cover Tunnel-2
In addition to description in Table 1.3-4, there are related works outlined below.
1） River Works
Table 1.3-5 Outline of River Works

Location Description
Station 2+800 Slightly shift river flow within the creek
Station 5+000 Widen river width due to installing bridge foundations
17
Location Description
Station 6+000 6+200 Linearize the current flexuous river flow for approx. 200 m
Station 14+300 Protect the one side of river bank by concrete
Station 15+200 Ditto
Station 22+300 Arrange current river flow by installing drainage with gabion
Source: NK-JV
2） Disposal Sites
There are 5 candidate disposal sites as shown in Table 1.3-6 though the Contractor will decide the sites
before construction works are commenced.
Table 1.3-6 Outline of Candidate Disposal Sites

1. Approx. 800 m east from Station 15+200
This is private plain land, and approx. 30,000 m3
of soil disposable is considered as possible.
* The area delineated in white line is the candidate site.

This is private land of valley, and approx. 600,000 m3 of soil disposable is considered as possible
3. Approx. 200 m west from Station 18+900
This is private land of valley, and approx.
100,000 m3 of soil disposable is considered as
possible.
* The area delineated in pink line is the candidate site.
18
4. Approx. 800 m east from Station 23+000, and 5. Approx. 1.5 km east from Station 23+000
Photo of Location No. 4 Photo of Location No. 5

This is private plain land, and approx. 200,000 m3 of This is private plain land, and approx. 200,000 m3 of
soil disposable is considered as possible. soil disposable is considered as possible.
Source: NK-JV
3） Arrangement of Relocation Site for Informal Settlers

There are numbers of Informal Setters (IFSs) who are requested to relocate due to implementing the
Project though National Housing Authority (NHA) will officially determine who will be IFSs for the
Project based on NHA database. A relocation site will be arranged for them, and a candidate site is
located approx. 1.3 km west from Station 17+000. The candidate site is approx. 3.7 ha, and necessary
development to be used as a relocation site will be done by NHA.
(4) Construction Method
The planning construction methods are summarized in Table 1.3-7.
Table 1.3-7 Outline of Construction Methods of the Project

Structure Construction Method
Road Works Cut ➢ Bench cut method
➢ Total excavation volume is 4,142,395.21 m3
Embankment ➢ Using the general earth work and Mechanically Stabilized Earth
(MSE) wall
➢ Using excavated materials after filtering unsuitable materials
➢ Total embankment volume is 3,140,908.19 m3
Drainage Side ditch, seam ditch, pipe culvert and box culvert
19
Structure Construction Method

Slop Protection [Non-Structural Method]
➢ Fill slope areas: Spraying seed
➢ Cut slope of general soil areas: Coconut mat soil protection
[Structural Method]
➢ Fill slope areas: Stone pitching with mortar
➢ Cut slop in soft rock areas: Spraying concrete
[Combined Method (vegetation and structure)]
➢ Spraying crib-works with anchor and seed packet works
River Works ➢ River diversion and revetment
➢ Bank protection by gabions and gabion mattresses at the proposed
all bridge and ramp bridge locations
Bridge Works Substructure ➢ Benoto Method for the areas with sufficient space
➢ Shinso Method for the narrower areas
Superstructure ➢ Electing girders by a crane
➢ Electing girders by launching girder for the areas where a crane
cannot be installed
Tunnel Works Main Tunnel ➢ New Australian Tunneling Method (NATM) Bench Cut Method
Cut & Cover Tunnel ➢ Cut & Cover Method
Source: NK-JV
(5) Construction Schedule（最新スケジュールを確認後に記載）
1.4 Target of Updated EIS

Table 1.4-1 and Figure 1.4-1 show the target area for updating EIS.
The Project plans to traverse 18 Barangays in total as shown in Table 1.4-1, and these Barangays were
the target area of environmental study at the time of JICA FS for preparing the original EIS. Barangay
Bago Oshiro was newly added in the project area in DED due to slightly shifting the center line at Station
9+762.55 to 9+773.11 to the east side. As a result, only a small part of the edge in ROW was located in
Barangay Bago Oshiro.
Table 1.4-1 Project Area

Station (km)
Package Barangay Sub-District District
From To
Package I-2 0 0+976.5 1. Sirawan Toril Third
0+976.5 3+130.78 2. Marapangi
3+130.78 4+984.05 3. Bato
4+984.05 5+383.39 4. Lubogan Tugbok
5+383.39 6+190 5. Alambre Toril
6+190 6+962.19 6. Bankas Heights
6+962.19 9+737.12 7. Mulig
9+762.55 9+773.11 8. Bago Oshir Tugbok
9+737.12 11+573.42 9-1. Mintal
9-2. Mintal
11+573.42 12+800
10-1. Tugbok
20
Station (km)
Package Barangay Sub-District District
From To
Package I-1 11+800 12+842.53 10-2. Tugbok
12+842.53 17+789.26 11. Tacunan
17+789.26 19+821.39 12. Matina Biao
19+821.39 21+664.42 13. Magtuod Talmo First
21+664.42 22+991.18 14. Waan Buhangin Second
22+991.18 23+500 15-1. Tigatto
Package I-3 23+600 25+390.41 15-2. Tigatto
25+390.41 27+355.49 16. Cabantian
27+355.49 28+015.73 17. Communal
28+015.73 29+600 18. Indangan
Source: NK-JV
21
Source: NK-JV
Figure 1.4-1 Target Area of Updated EIS
22
CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF POLICY, LEGAL AND

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Policy of Environmental and Social Considerations

Major legislations on environmental and social conservation related to the Project are listed in Table
2.1-1.
Table 2.1-1 Major Laws and Regulations on Environmental Conservation related to the
Project
Title of Regulations Outline
1. Environmental Policy
Presidential Decree No. 1151 Stipulating environmental policy
Presidential Code No. 1152 Environmental regulations
2. Environmental Conservation
Stipulating to establish the national committee on air and
Public Law No. 3931
water pollution management
Regulation on penalty for illegal dump of disposal, dirt
Presidential Decree (PD) No. 825 (1975)
and other wastes
Regulation on responsibility for treatment of solid and
Presidential Decree (PD) No. 826 (1975)
liquid wastes by local government
Presidential Decree (PD) No.1152 (1977) Regulation on method and management of wastes
Republic Act No. 8749 Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999
Republic Act No. 9275 Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004
DENR Administrative Order No. 2000-81 Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRRs) for RA8749
The guideline of water quality and genal effluent
DENR Administrative Order No. 2016-08
standards of 2016
DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-30 IRRS for EIS System in the Philippines
DENR Administrative Order No. 36 Series of Procedural manual of DAO 92-29 stipulating legal and
2004 (DAO 04-36) technical requirements of hazardous waste management
DENR Administrative Order No. 49 Series of The technical guidelines for municipal solid waste
1998 (DAO 98-49) management
Republic Act No. 9003 Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000
DENR Administrative Order No. 34 Series of
Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRRs) of RA 9003
1990 (DAO 01-34)
3. Land Acquisition
Republic Act 7279 or the Urban Development and Stipulating procedures for eviction and demolition for
Housing Act of 1992 informal settlers’ families
Stipulating to prepare Land Acquisition Plan and
DPWH Department Order No. 5 Series of 2003 Resettlement Action Plan (LAPRAP) in case land
acquisition is needed
Stipulating the necessary guidelines for the preparation
DPWH Department Order No. 327 Series of 2003 of land acquisition and resettlement action plan for
infrastructure projects
Stipulating the scope and delegation of the ROW
DPWH Department Order No. 65 Series of 2017 functions and creation and composition of ROW task
forces
Source: Compiled by NK-JV based on Preparatory Survey for South Mindanao Economic Corridor Improvement (Davao City
Bypass Construction Project) (JICA, February 2015)
23
2.2 Institutional Framework
2.2.1 Institutional Framework for Environmental Management
Relevant parties and their responsibilities to implement environmental management for the Project were
defined in the Original EIS as summarized in Table 2.2-1. Responsibility of each party defined in the
table is still same though alignment is slightly shifted.
Table 2.2-1 Responsibilities of the Relevant Parties at Each Stage

Project Stage Organization Responsibility
Pre-Construction ESSD of DPWH ➢ Overseeing the implementation of the EMP by the Contractor;
and Construction ➢ Overseeing the updating of the Resettlement Action Plan
(RAP) after the DED;
➢ Assisting in the conduct of IEC Meetings as enumerated in the
IEC Framework of this EIS
➢ Monitoring actual payments of compensation to affected
landowners, structure owners, and crops/trees owners;
➢ In coordination with the Davao City District Engineering
Office prepare periodic supervision and monitoring reports on
RAP implementation; and
Construction ➢ Inspection of mitigation measures and environmental
Supervision monitoring conducted by the contractor based on the approved
Consultant EIS
➢ Report the monitoring result to DPWH by monthly report
UPMO-RMC1 of ➢ Ensure that compliance to all conditions stipulated in the ECC
DPWH are included as provisions in the Bid Documents to be issued
to prospective Contractors;
➢ Execution of MOA with DENR-EMB Region XI, Davao City
and Panabo City LGUs regarding formation and
operationalization of the Multi-Partite Monitoring Team
(MMT) for implementing the Environmental Monitoring Plan
Multi-Partite ➢ Validate project compliance with the conditions stipulated in
the ECC and the EMP;
Monitoring Team ➢ Validate DPWH’s conduct of self-monitoring;
(MMT) ➢ Receive complaints, gather relevant information to facilitate
determination of validity of complaints or concerns about the
project and timely transmit to the Proponent and EMB
recommended measures to address the complaint;
➢ Prepare, integrate and disseminate simplified validation
reports to community stakeholders; and
➢ Make regular and timely submission of MMT Reports based
on the EMB-prescribed format
➢ Observe/participate as applicable during conduct of
monitoring activities;
➢ Coordinate with the Pollution Control Officer (PCO) of
Contractors assigned to the Project, to ensure that conditions
stipulated in the ECCs are properly complied with, including
the gathering of baseline data on
➢ air and water quality, and subsequent monitoring of such;
➢ Notify DPWH ESSD about any act or activity by the
Contractors that are deemed as violations to the stipulations in
the ECCs and amendments issued, and recommend immediate
courses of action to avoid or mitigate any violation to said
stipulations; and
24
Project Stage Organization Responsibility

➢ Compile monitoring data gathered by the Contractors and
supervise preparation of semi-annual monitoring reports to be
submitted to the DENR
Construction Contractor ➢ Implanting mitigation measures and monitoring based on the
approved EMP on EIS and RAP
Operation Region XI and DEO ➢ Regular inspection and maintenance of the Bypass Road,
of DPWH including all appurtenant structures
➢ Conducting monitoring for 2 years after construction of the
bypass
Source: Preparatory Survey for South Mindanao Economic Corridor Improvement (Davao City Bypass Construction Project)
(JICA, February 2015)
Figure 2.2-1 shows the organizational structure to implement environmental management for the Project.
Since Panabo City is the area for Package II (to be financed by GOP), DPWH Panabo City DEO will
participate into this structure when the construction works of Package II is commenced.
CONTRACTOR
ESSD UPMO-RMC1 (Bi-Lateral) DPWH

(Environmental and Davao City 2nd DEO
Social Safeguards
(Unified Project Management
Office Road Management & Panabo City DEO
Division)
Cluster 1)
MULTI-PARTITE MONITORING TEAM (MMT)

Representatives from:
DPWH Davao City 2 nd DEO; DPWH DEO Panabo City; DENR-
EMB Region XI; DENR-FMB Region XI; PCA Region XI; Bureau
of Plant Industry (BPI) Region XI; DCWD; CENRO Davao City &
Panabo City; TMG of Davao City and Panabo City; ESHO/PCO
of Contractor; Chairpersons of Affected Barangays; Farmers’
Associations
Source: Compiled by NK-JV based on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Davao City Bypass
Construction Project (October 2014)
Figure 2.2-1 Organizational Structure to Impelemnt Environmental Management for the
Project
25
CHAPTER 3: BASELINE NATURAL AND SOCIAL

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
3.1 Physical Natural and Social Enviromental Conditions

The project area is still within the same area from the Original EIS, and physical natural and social
environmental conditions in and around the project area is considered as not changed based on
observation from site reconnaissance conducted in this DED. Physical natural and social environmental
conditions confirmed by the Original EIS are summarized below.
(1) Land Use
According to the Original EIS, the proposed alignment would traverse three (3) major zones which are
composed of six (6) sub-zones as shown in Table 3.1-1. The major land use of the project area is
agricultural area such as palm tree and secondary woodland and residential area.
Table 3.1-1 Summary of Land Use in the Project Area

Major Zones Sub-Zones Description
Major Urban Medium Density Residential Housing/dwelling area
Zone Sub-Zone
Minor Commercial Sub-Zone Central Business sub-zone (CBD), principally for
trade, services and business activities
Medium Industrial Sub-Zone Area for pollutive/non-hazardous and pollutive/
hazardous manufacturing and processing
establishments
General Institutional Sub-zone Areas with an established organization or
foundation especially one dedicated to education,
public service or culture
Agricultural Prime Agricultural Land All types of agricultural activities identified and
Land Zone delineated in the Watershed Code and areas
declared as Strategic Agriculture and Fisheries
Development Zone (SAFDZ) per Republic Act No.
8435
Agri-Non-Tillage Land Consisting of 12,240 identified and declared as
Environmentally Critical Areas (ECA) in the
Watershed Code of Davao City
Agro-Industrial Area for integrated farm operations and
Zone processing activities for farm products
Source: Compiled by NK-JV based on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Davao City Bypass Construction Project
(October 2014)
26
Source: Compiled by NK-JV based on Compiled by NK-JV based on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Davao City
Bypass Construction Project (October 2014)
Figure 3.1-1 Land Use Map of Davao City (2013-2022)
(2) Topography and Geology
The proposed alignment is planned to be passed through a mountainous area traversing some rivers as
shown topographical and geological conditions in Figure 3.1-2 which was confirmed by JICA FS.
27
Figure 3.1-2 Topographical and Geological Condition in the Projec Area
(3) Hydrology
The project area is located at the 7 different watersheds such as Lipadas, Talomo, Matina, Davao,
Panacan, Bunawan and Lasang as shown in Figure 3.1-3, and most of production wells are located at
the downstream of Talomo watershed area. The project area has 5 major river systems; Davao, Lasang,
Talomo, Lipadas and Matina Rivers, and a number of smaller river systems will also be traversed by the
project area.
Flooding is a common occurrence in specific locations in Davao City. Generally, floods can be classified
into riverine floods along the river system, localized floods in urban area due to combination of
cloudburst, saturated soil, poor infiltration rates and inadequate or poorly built/maintained drainage lines,
flooding due to typhoon and storm surge in the coastal areas, subsiding coastline; and flood flow
impedance by high tide.
28
Source: Preparatory Survey for South Mindanao Economic Corridor Improvement (Davao City Bypass
Construction Project (JICA, February 2015)
Figure 3.1-3 Watersheds in the Projec Area
(4) Flora and Fauna
Field survey for terrestrial flora and fauna was conducted at 20 survey sites (19 points for plant survey
and 20 sites for bird survey) during FS for preparing the original EIS. Figure 3.1-4 shows the survey
sites, and S1 to S14 is the project area.
29
*S20 is located at Matina River, Brgy. Matina Biao (Tunnel Site).

Figure 3.1-4 Flora and Fauna Survey Sites at the Original EIS
30
1) Flora
The Original EIS explained that 19 vegetation transects counting 5,487 plants in total were
confirmed at the entire project area. The 5,487 species were resolved into 64 families and 185
species (i.e. 1 zingiber species, 2 aroids, 2 fern allies, 2 pandan species, 2 sedges, 5 palms, 15
grasses, 17 ferns, 18 shrubs, 26 herbs, 27 vines and 62 trees). These are the characteristics of
recorded 185 species, and details are shown in Attachment-1.
- Out of 185 species, 10 are the endemic species,
- There are 3 species classified as endangered, 2 species classified as critically endangered,
1 species classified as endangered/vulnerable, and 1 species classified as vulnerable
species in DAO 2007-01, and
- There are 16 species classified as least concern and 6 species classified as vulnerable
species in IUCN Redlist (2013)
2) Fauna
a) Birds
The first survey was conducted at the beginning of April 2014 for the entire alignment, and the
second survey was additionally conducted at the beginning of February 2015 for the Matinao-Biao
and Magtuod section.
In the first survey, total 336 individuals resolved into 29 species and 22 families were identified.
There were 4 dominant species, Corvus macrorhynchos, Egretta garzetta, Batrachostomus
septimus and Saxicola caprata, and the first three (3) species are widely distributed in the country.
In the second survey, total of 68 birds resolved into 21 species were found. The most abundant
species of bird at the time of sampling was represented by the ubiquitous yellow-vented bulbul
(Pycnonotus goaivier).
Highest diversity of birds was observed along the riparian habitats of Matina River in Barangay
Langub and Barangay Matina Biao due to the presence of remnant stands of trees, relatively dense
forest cover and low population density.
Among bird species identified during the field survey, 28 species are categorized as Least Concern
in IUCN Redlist, and 1 species is categorized as Vulerable in DAO 2004-15 and IUCN Redlist.
Details are attached in Attachment-2.
b) Herpetofauna
Total 74 frog individuals resolved into 5 species and 4 families (i.e. Bufonidae, Dicroglossidae,
Microhylidae, and Raniidae) were found in the four sampling sites along the entire alignment. The
cane toad (Bufo marinus) was the dominated species in the entire survey area. These 5 species are
categorized as Least Concern in IUCN Redlist (2014) though they are not endemic species.
c) Bats
31
Total 50 individual bats resolved into 4 species were found at the 3 sampling sites. Lesser dog-
faced fruit bat (Cynopterus brachyotis) was the dominant species found in the field survey. These
4 species are categorized as Least Concern in IUCN Redlist (2014). One of them is endemic species
though the remaining 3 species are widely distributed in Southeast Asia.
(5) Pollutant
Site measurement for air quality, water quality and noise was conducted during JICA FS at the following
measurement points.
Figure 3.1-5 Site Measurment Points at the Original EIS Time
1) Air Quality
Measurement results of air quality at JICA FS are summarized in Table 3.1-2. It was observed from
32
the measurement results that air quality in the project area was below the Philippines standard
values.
Table 3.1-2 Summary of Air Quality Conditions in the Project Area
Location A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 Philippines
Connected Connected Connected Connected Connected Residential Near Standard
road road road road and road area school
near (ambient) (ambient)
university
TSP 298.5 158.3 128.1 275.9 221.1 57.7 82.0 300
NO2 6.1 3.7 2.4 3.7 4.3 1.7 0.9 260
SO2 7.8 1.8 4.6 13.9 5.1 0.8 1.1 340
CO 1.0 <1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 30
2) Noise
Measurement results of noise level at JICA FS are summarized in Table 3.1-3. It was observed from
the measurement results that noise level at most of measurement points was exceeded the
Philippines standard values.
Table 3.1-3 Summary of Noise Conditions in the Project Area

N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7 Philippines
Standard
Connected Connected Connected Connected Connected Residential Near N1-5 N6-7
Location
road road road road and road area school
near (ambient) (ambient)
university
Morning - - - - - 64 62 60 65
Daytime 72 72 74 80 73 64 64 65 50
Evening - - - - - 57 69 60 45
Night - - - - - 53 62 55 40
Time
3) Water Quality
Measurement results of water quality at JICA FS are summarized in Table 3.1-4. It was observed
that water quality parameters generally conform to the prescribed limits for Class C (primarily used
for the propagation and growth of fish and other aquatic resources) waters, except total coliform
and fecal coliform counts.
Table 3.1-4 Summary of Water Quality in the Project Area

DAO 34
Parameters W1 W2 W3 W4 W5
CLASS C
DO, mg/L 5.0 7.3 7.6 7.3 7.5 7.1
pH, @26.2°C 6.5-8.5 7.87 7.75 7.73 7.71 7.97
TSS, mg/L (a) ND 82.0 2.0 4.0 1.0
BOD, mg/L 7 1.1 0.5 2.0 3.9 2.7
33
DAO 34
Parameters W1 W2 W3 W4 W5
CLASS C
COD, mg O2/L 100 9.7 6.7 8.7 14.5 9.7
Oil and Grease, mg/L 2 ND 0.67 ND ND ND
Total Coliforms, 1000 5.4 x 103 9.2 x 103 9.2 x 103 1.6 x 104 9.2 x 103
MPN/100 mL
Fecal Coliforms, 1000 3.5 x 103 9.2 x 103 1.3 x 103 1.6 x 104 5.4 x 103
MPN/100 mL
(a) Not more than 30 mg/L increase; the prescribed criterion entails that increase of measured TSS should not exceed 30 mg/L
of the receiving water body
Source: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (October 2014)
(6) Freshwater Ecology
Total 31 individuals of freshwater fish and 1 freshwater shell were recorded at the 5 river sampling
stations along the proposed Davao City Bypass alignment at JICA FS. Fish captures were dominated by
mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis), followed by tilapia (Oreochromis nilotica) and spotted barb (Puntius
binotatus). All freshwater fish recorded in the survey were classified as Least Concern in IUCL Redlist
as shown in Table 3.1-5. The Original EIS study confirmed that Cichlidae, Channidae and Poecillidae
are introduced and the remaining are the natives.
Table 3.1-5 Freshwater Fish in the Project Area

Relative
Family Common Name Species Name IUCL RedList Abundance Abundance
(%)
Poecillidae Mosquito Fish Gambusia affinis Least Concern 12 37.50
Cichlidae Tilapia Oreochromis Least Concern 8 25.00
nilotica
Cyprinidae Spotted Barb Puntius binotatus Least Concern 7 21.88
Channidae Striped Channa striata Least Concern 2 6.25
snakehead
Gobiidae Celebes Goby Glossogobius Least Concern 2 6.25
celebius
Thiaridae Suso Melania sp. Least Concern 1 3.13
Total 32 100.00
3.2 People
According to the Original EIS, total number of households in Davao City is estimated as 1,443,890
households based on the 2010 Census. This is 32.43% of the total population in the Southern Mindanao
Region, 5.71% of the total population in Mindanao, and 1.57% of the total Philippine population.
Sex distribution was an almost equal number of males and females counting 49.9% and 50.1%
respectively. As for dependent, 31.4% of the total population was the young (0-14 years old) and 3.6%
is the old group (65 and over). The working age (15 and over) population accounted for 64.9% of the
total population with an almost equal share between males and females.
34
Table 3.2-1 Population Distribution in Davao City

Age Group Both Sexes Male Female Sex Ratio
No. % No. % No. %

School Going Population
Pre-school (3-6) 125,712 22.05 65,212 22.83 60,500 21.27 1.07
Elementary (7-12) 173,647 30.46 89,483 31.34 84,164 29.59 1.06
Secondary (13-16) 115,067 20.19 56,587 19.82 58,480 20.56 1.04
Tertiary (17-21) 155,572 27.29 74,277 26.01 81,295 28.58 1.10
Total 569,998 100.00 285,559 100.00 284,439 100.00 1.00
Labor Force 990,204 68.58 487,584 49.52 502,620 50.48 1.03
(15 and over)
Working Age 937,212 64.91 464,077 32.14 473,135 32.77 1.02
(15-64)
Dependent population
Young (0-14) 453,686 31.42 233,769 51.53 219,917 48.47 1.06

Old (65 and over) 52,992 3.67 23,507 44.36 29,485 55.64 1.25
Total 1,443,890 100.00 721,353 100.00 722,537 100.00
(1) Literacy Rate, Profile of Educational Attainment
The Original EIS studied educational attainment in Davao City, and found that 97.09% reached various
levels of educational attainment as shown in Table 3.2-2.
Table 3.2-2 Educational Attainment in Davao City in 2010

Highest Educational Male Female Both Sexes
Attainment No. % No. % No. %
No Grade Completed 19,033 52.72 17,068 47.28 36,101 2.81
Pre – School 23,448 52.42 21,282 47.58 44,730 3.49
Elementary 195,273 53.35 170,724 46.65 365,997 28.52
High School 220,434 48.42 234,845 51.58 455,279 35.48
Post – Secondary 20,313 55.36 16,382 44.64 36,695 2.86
College 76,879 48.12 82,895 51.88 159,774 12.45
Undergraduate
Academic Degree 80,222 44.72 99,181 55.28 179,403 13.98
Holder
Post Baccalaureate 1,769 44.60 2,197 55.40 3,966 0.31
Not Stated 562 49.60 571 50.40 1,113 0.09
Total 637,933 49.72 645,145 50.28 1,283,078 100.00
(2) Water Supply
According to the Original EIS, 106 barangays (58.24%) out of 182 barangays are served Level III water
supply system operated by the Davao City Water District (DCWD). The remaining 76 barangays are
served by Level I and II water supply systems as shown in Table 3.2-3.
35
Table 3.2-3 Water Supply System in the Project Area

District/Sub- Total No. of Level I % Level II %
District HH
District 1
Talomo 88,903 1,477 1.7 1,099 1.2
District 2
Buhangin 58,848 - - - -
Bunawan 29,871 214 0.7 3,032 10.1
District 3
Toril 30,623 7,126 23.3 7,997 26.1
Tugbok 20,888 690 3.3 1,344 6.4
Total 229,133 9,507 4.1 12,472 5.4
(3) Power Supply
The Davao Light and Power Company (DLPC) largely distributes the power supply of Davao City.
According to the study by the Original EIS, it distributes 66.79% of total households in the urban area
and 33.21% in the rural areas, and the project area is covered.
36
CHAPTER 4: UPDATED ENVIRONMENTAL AND

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
4.1 Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

This chapter updates impacts to be caused by implementing the Project based on the latest project
description shown in Table 1.3-4, project activities at each project stage shown in Table 4.1-1 and
physical environmental conditions explained in Chapter 3.
Table 4.1-1 Planned Project Activities at Each Project Stage

Project Stage Planned Activities of the Project
Before Construction Stage (BC) Acquiring land for securing land/space for roads, bridges, tunnels and related facilities
Cutting trees in the Project area
Procurement of construction materials, equipment, plants, etc.
Engineering works such as earthmoving

Construction Stage (CS)
Operation of construction machines, vehicles, plants, etc.
Installation of construction work offices, worker's camps, storage sites, etc.
Construction of roads, bridges, tunnels and related facilities

Demobilization/Decommission Clearing equipment, temporary facilities (i.e. construction office, construction yards and
Stage (DS) worker’s camp) from the project area
Operation of roads, bridges, tunnel and related facilities
Spatial occupancy of bridge, roads, flyover, on-ramp and related facilities

Operation Stage (OS)
Movement of people (inflow, outflow, migration, etc.)
Movement of goods (inflow, outflow, etc.)

Source: Compiled by NK-JV
Table 4.1-2 shows updated assessment of natural and social environmental impact to be caused due to
implementation of the Project.
Table 4.1-2 Updated Summary of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

Category Scoping Item Reason for Scoping Evaluation
Pollution Air Quality BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
CS: Impact on air quality (i.e. increasing level of TSP, NO2, SO2, and CO) due to earth work,
operation of construction machineries and traveling of construction vehicles is anticipated.
OS: Although positive impact to decrease level of CO2 is anticipated due to faster and smoother
traffic flow, increase of air pollutant is also anticipate due to increase of traffic volume.
Water Quality BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
CS: There is a possibility of turbidity due to earth works such as excavation for bridge
foundation and tunnel and increase in pH level and organic pollution due to domestic
wastewater from the contractor’s office and worker’s camp. However, extent of impact is
assumed as small since wastewater from construction works and contractor’s
office/worker’s camp will be treated by treatment facility/equipment.
DS: Possible contamination of waterways crossed by the bypass alignment may occur if residual
domestic and solid wastes are abandoned at the construction sites adjacent the rivers and
creeks.
OS: There is a possibility of water degradation due to soil erosion from the slope and
embankment areas if they will not be properly maintained.
37

Waste BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
CS: Waste such as soil and trees from construction works and domestic waste from worker’s
camp will be generated.
OS: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
Soil BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
Contamination CS: Soil contamination was not observed in the project area. Thus, diffusion of soil
contamination due to excavation work is not anticipated.
Sediment BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
CS: Contaminated soil is not existed in the project area. Thus, possibility of soil contamination
is considered as low.
Noise BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
CS: Increase of noise levels due to operation of construction machineries and traveling of
construction vehicle may temporarily occur.
OS: Noise level may increase in the area traversed by the bypass alignment at some extent.
Ground BC: Activities to be caused ground subsidence is not planned in the Project.
Subsidence CS: Excavation for tunnels may cause seepage of groundwater, which may cause ground
subsidence. Excavation work for tunnel is planned to be implemented by monitoring
volume of groundwater seepage, and it will be stopped once large volume of groundwater
seepage is observed. Thus, possibility of ground subsidence related to excavation for tunnel
is considered as low.
OS: It was found from the geological survey result that the soil condition in the project area was
quite hard. Thus, possibility to cause ground subsidence at the fill/embankment sections
after operation due to heavy traffic is low.
Offensive Odor BC/CS/OS: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
Natural Protected Areas BC/CS/OS: There is neither protected nor environmentally sensitive area in and around the
Environment project area.
Terrestrial Flora BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
and Fauna CS: Trees listed in IUCN Redlist or DAO in the Philippines were recorded in the project area, but
they are located in the riparian habitats. Thus, these trees due to implementation of the project
is not necessarily impacted. As for habitats of birds and/or others in the area, it may be
changed due to cutting tree though its impact is considered as small degree.
Aquatic Flora BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
and Fauna CS: A possibility to hamper movement of aquatic organism along the waterways may be small
since sufficient space between piers is planned to be secured. However, river diversion and
river bank protection works may temporarily affect habitation of aquatic flora and fauna. In
addition, turbidity due to earth work may temporarily affect aquatic flora and fauna.
DS: There is a possibility that residual construction spoils particularly earth materials may be
eroded during high precipitation periods and cause increased siltation rate of adjacent
waterways.
Hydrology BC: Significant negative impact is not anticipated.
CS: Groundwater regime above the proposed tunnel area will not materially changes since the
overlying rocks do not hold much groundwater. In addition, volume of seepage due to
excavation of tunnel will be small based on the groundwater condition. Thus, significant
impact to hydrology is not considered.
Topography and BC: There will not be any activities which will cause negative impact to topography and
geology geology.
CS: Slope failure, soil erosion and rock fall may potentially occur along high cut slope sections
widely underlain by unconsolidated soil layers of sand and gravel due to cut (tress release),
weathering, erosion, and water infiltration. Since conceivable potential risk is already
avoided in the design and construction methods to be applied, possibility to cause impact to
topography and geology is considered as small.
Social Involuntary BC: Land acquisition and resettlement is inevitable though effort to minimize land resettlement
environment Resettlement impact was made. Total 308 families will be necessary to be relocated for implementing the
Project. RAP was prepared separately by holding consultation meeting with LGUs and
project affected persons in timely manner.
CS: No negative impact is anticipated.
OS: No negative impact is anticipated.
38

Livelihood and BC: There is a possibility that household of land-based income sources including running shops
Local Economy will be affected their income source due to land acquisition.
CS: Beneficial impacts such as creation of employment opportunity for construction works are
expected.
OS: Through the Project, road network in the area may be improved. It will contribute for
enhancement of the local economy.
Cultural BC/CS/OS: The proposed alignment will not traverse any area covered by Certificates of
Heritage Ancestral Domain Title (CAD). Thus, there will not be any negative impact on cultural
heritage.
Vulnerable BC: Among project affected families, 58 families are headed by the elderly, 1 household is
Groups headed by the young, 279 families are regarded as the poor and 72 families are headed by
female. These families are defined as vulnerable families according to the criteria set by
RAP for the Project though one family can fall into 2 or 3 vulnerable categories. Special
assistance is considered in RAP to mitigate their impact to be cause by land acquisition for
the Project.
CS: Job opportunity as construction workers will be increased for vulnerable groups living near
the Project area.
OS: Job opportunity as workers of maintenance of road and bridge will be increased for
vulnerable groups living near the Project area.
Land Use BC: There will not be any activities which will change land use.
CS: Current land use (i.e. residential land, agricultural land and green area) will be changed due
to construction works.
OS: Due to bypass road, the surrounding area will be developed and urbanized. Accordingly,
land use at the roadside of bypass will be changed from agricultural land to residential or
industrial land.
Water Use BC: There will not be any activities which will change water use.
CS: River surface water in the project area is generally used for domestic use such as bathing
and washing. Thus, there is a possibility that turbid water due to earth works during
construction may affect domestic water use. As for usage of groundwater, as explained in
“Hydrology”, impact to groundwater regime is considered as small. Therefore, impact to
groundwater use is considered as small.
OS: There will not be any activities which will change usage of river surface water or
groundwater.
Existing Social BC: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Infrastructures CS: Relocation of approx. 50 power posts, 2 locations of high voltage electrical lines and 7
and Services locations of water pipes and protection of water pipes at 4 locations are necessary. These
works will cause temporary access limitation. In addition, traffic congestion due to increase
of construction vehicles is anticipated.
OS: The current traffic situation will be improved by implementing the project. In addition, the
bypass tunnel will improve connectivity between the west and east side areas which are
currently separated by a mountain.
Misdistribution BC: Misdistribution of benefit and damage would be occurred since there are PAPs who need to
of Benefit and relocate, while there are people who would get job opportunity as workers related to the
Damage Project.
CS/OS: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Local Conflict BC: Local conflict of interests would be happened if job opportunity increased by the Project is
of Interests mis-distributed to PAPs and the surrounding community.
CS/OS: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Health and Risks for BC: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Safety Infectious CS: There is possibility to increase the risks of infectious disease due to influx of construction
Disease such as workers into the Project area.
AIDS/HIV OS: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Occupational BC: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Health and CS: Accidents related to construction works may be occurred if construction and equipment
Safety maintenance are not properly implemented or workers are not properly educated.
OS: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Community BC: Significant impact is not anticipated
Health and CS/OS: Impacts on community health and safety are anticipated due to influx of construction
Safety workers, increase of vehicle traffic and operation of construction machineries during the
construction stage as well as increase of traffic volume after the operation stage.
Emergency Flood Risk BC: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Risk CS: Although the Project includes embankment and cut, earth works will not alter the
hydrological condition in the area. Thus, it is assumed that the Project related works will
39

not cause flood. However, there is a risk of flood at construction sites near the river after
heavy rain.
DS: There is a possibility of aggravation of the existing flood conditions along the identified flood
risk area in case construction spoils and debris impede flow of waterways.
OS: There is a possibility of aggravation of the existing flood conditions along the identified flood
risk area in case drainage facilities to be installed are not properly maintained.
Risk of Fire BC: Significant impact is not anticipated.
CS: There is a possibility to increase the risk of fire related to construction work.
OS: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Other Global BC: Significant impact is not anticipated.
Warming CS: Small scale and temporary generation of greenhouse gases like CO2 are expected due to
construction vehicles and machines. However, impact on transboundary and climate
change is negligible
OS: Increase in greenhouse gases like CO2 is expected in a small scale due to increase of traffic
volume. However, impact on transboundary and climate change is negligible.
Notes: Works on tree cut and relocation of public utilities are regarded as the works in the construction stage although they
were included in the pre-construction phase in the original EIS.
Source: Compiled by NK-JV referring to Compiled by NK-JV based on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Davao City
Bypass Construction Project (October 2014) and Preparatory Survey for South Mindanao Economic Corridor
Improvement (Davao City Bypass Construction Project) (JICA, February 2015)
40
CHAPTER 5: UPDATED ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT PLAN
5.1 Updated Mitigation Measures

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) consists of a set of mitigation and monitoring measures
to be taken into consideration to eliminate or to reduce adverse environmental and social impacts
identified at each project stage (i.e. pre-construction, construction, Demobilization/Decommission and
operation stages) through impact assessment until they become acceptable levels. The categories
evaluated as negative impact regardless of impact extent in the environmental impact assessment were
examined mitigation measures. In addition, responsibility and organization structure to implement
mitigation measures is clarified. Mitigation measures and implementing organization at each project
stage were examined in the Original EIS, which were updated as shown in the tables below based on
the updated impact assessment.
41
Table 5.1-1 Summary of Identified Potential Negative Impact and Mitigation Measures at the Pre-Construction Stage
Category Items Identified Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Concerned Implementing Responsible Items of Expenditure
Package Organization Organization
Social Involuntary - Loss or change livelihood - Preparation of appropriate All package UPMO-RMC1 UPMO-RMC1 Expense for
Environment Resettlement* of relocated families RAP and holding (DPWH) (DPWH) compensation and
consultation with affected assistance
people in timely manner
Vulnerable - Loss or change of - Preparation of appropriate All package UPMO-RMC1 UPMO-RMC1 Expense for
Groups* livelihood RAP and holding (DPWH) (DPWH) compensation and
consultation with affected assistance
people in timely manner
Livelihood and - Lose or decrease land- - Provide appropriate All package UPMO-RMC1 UPMO-RMC1 Expense for
local economy based income source assistance in accordance (DPWH) (DPWH) compensation and
with RAP assistance
Misdistribution of - Possibility of conflict - Consult with project All package UPMO-RMC1 UPMO-RMC1 Miscellaneous
Benefit and between people in and affected persons timely, (DPWH) (DPWH) expense
Damage around the project area due - Assign a staff in cage of
to inequality complain, and
- Examine appropriate
measures by holding
consultation among
concerned parties
Local Conflict of - Possibility of conflict - Consult with project All package UPMO-RMC1 UPMO-RMC1 Miscellaneous
Interests between people in and affected persons timely, (DPWH) (DPWH) expense
around the project area due - Assign a staff in cage of
to inequality complain, and
- Examine appropriate
measures by holding
consultation among
concerned parties
Source: NK-JV
42
Table 5.1-2 Summary of Identified Potential Negative Impact and Mitigation Measures at the Construction Stage
Pollution Air Quality - Temporary increase of air - Use construction machines All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 - Expense for car
pollutants (i.e. increasing and vehicles with good (DPWH) maintenance
level of TSP, NO2, SO2, conditions, - Expense for
CO) from construction - Limit speed for sprinkle water
vehicle and machines and construction machines at
civil works construction sites adjacent
to residential areas
- Sprinkle water timely
Water Quality - Deterioration of water - Proper treatment of water All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Expense for
quality especially siltation pollutants generated from (DPWH) installation of
due to excavation and construction works in equipment/facilities
earth working, oil and accordance with the
grease contamination, regulations in the
coliform contamination Philippines,
and organic pollution from - Arrange silt traps or
worker’s camps and sedimentation pond as
increase in pH level due to necessary not to discharge
concrete spillage wastewater from
construction sites to public
water cannels directly,
- Shelter scattered river mud
from dredging works by
using silt fence as
necessary
- Install portable toilet for
workers
Waste - Soil waste from - Dispose waste at the All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Expense for education
construction works designated places after (DPWH) on waste management
- Human-related waste from considering a possibility of for workers
daily life at the worker’s reuse
camp and construction - Provide education on
offices waste management to
construction workers
43
Noise - Increase noise level due to - Avoiding works of heavy All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 - Maintenance of
construction work equipment during the night (DPWH) equipment
time around the sensitive - Installation of
area such as residential equipment
area
- Install soundproof
walls/acoustic enclosures
as necessary
- Inform the construction
schedule to surrounding
communities to obtain
their consensus
Natural Terrestrial Flora - Decrease green area - Cut trees only at the All package DENR and other DENR and other Expense for
Environment and Fauna designated area according concerned tree owner concerned tree relocation/replanting
owner
to permission from authorities trees
authorities
concerned authorities
- Plant trees at sites
designated by DENR
Aquatic Flora and - Impact to aquatic fauna - Same as mitigation All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Same as Water
Fauna due to deterioration of measures explained in (DPWH) Quality
water quality by Water Quality
degradation of water
quality due to excavation
works and wastewater
from construction yards
and worker’s camp
Social Land Use - Change the current use - Cut trees only at the All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Expense for tree cut
Environment (i.e. residential land, designated area according (DPWH)
agricultural land and green to permission from
area) due to construction
works. concerned authorities
Water Use - Impact to domestic water - Inform construction All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Miscellaneous
use of river surface water schedule and contents to (DPWH) expense
due to turbidity by earth the downstream
works and excavation
communities in advance
44
- Impact to groundwater use - Provide alternative water
though such impact is sources in case ground
considered as small water is affected due to
construction work
Existing Social - Temporary disturbance or - Preparation of appropriate All package Each authority Each authority Miscellaneous
Infrastructures limitation of road traffic relocation plan maintaining public maintaining expense
and Services due to relocation of public - Informing relocation utility public utility
utilities above ground and works in the communities
underground in timely manner.
- Temporary traffic - Control traffic volume All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Miscellaneous
congestion due to (DPWH) expense
temporary closure, detour
or access limitation for
construction work
Health and Infectious - Increase risk of infectious - Prepare and implement All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Expense for
Safety Disease such as disease due to influx of HIV/AIDS prevention plan (DPWH) implementing plan
HIV/AIDS construction workers in the
construction site
Occupational - Increase risk of safety for - Prepare and implement a All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Expense for education
Health and Safety construction workers due safety plan (DPWH) to workers
to mishandling of - Provide education to
equipment or accidents of construction workers on
construction vehicles safety at the construction
site
Community - Increase risk of safety at - Prepare and implement All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Expense for education
Health and Safety surrounding communities safety plan (DPWH) to surrounding
due to increase of communities
construction vehicles and
machines
Emergency Flood - Impact of flood at the - Prepare and implement All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Miscellaneous
Risk construction sites near the safety plan (DPWH) expense
rivers after heavy rain
Fire - Increasing fire risk at the - Prepare and implement All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Expense for education
construction yards safety plan (DPWH) to workers
Source: NK-JV
45
Table 5.1-3 Summary of Identified Potential Impact and Mitigation Measures at the Demobilization/ Decommissioning Stage
Category Items Identified Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Relevant Implementing Responsible Items of
Package Organization Organization Expenditure
Pollution Water Quality - Possibility of - Dismantle all temporary All package Contractor UPMO-RMC1 Miscellaneous
contamination of equipment/facilities (DPWH) expense
waterways crossed by the - Inspect the site condition
bypass alignment if with all concerned parties
residual domestic and solid
wastes are abandoned at
the construction sites
adjacent the rivers and
creeks
Source: NK-JV
Table 5.1-4 Summary of Identified Potential Negative Impact and Mitigation Measures at the Operation Stage
Pollution Air quality - Increase air pollutants (i.e. - Sufficient control of traffic All package Region XI of DPWH Region XI of Expense for
increasing level of TSP, volume and flow by proper DPWH maintaining road,
NO2, SO2) due to increase maintenance of road and bridge and other
vehicle transportation bridge and other equipment
equipment such as traffic
signal
Noise - Possibility of increase - Sufficient control of traffic All package Region XI of DPWH Region XI of Expense for
level of noise due to volume and flow by proper DPWH maintaining road,
increase of traffic volume maintenance of road and bridge and other
bridge and other equipment
equipment such as traffic
signal
Health and Community - Possibility of increase - Provide education on All package Region XI Region XI of Miscellaneous
Safety Health and Safety traffic accidents due to traffic safety at the DPWH expense
increase of traffic volume surrounding communities
Emergency Flood Risk - Possibility of aggravation - Monitor drainage All package Region XI Region XI of Miscellaneous
Risk of the existing flood conditions regularly DPWH expense
conditions along the
identified flood risk area in
46
case drainage facilities to
be installed by the Project
are not properly
maintained
Source: NK-JV
47
5.2 Updated Monitoring Plan

The environmental monitoring plans including monitoring items, location, frequency and responsibility
at each project phase are shown in Table 5.2-1 to Table 5.1-4. Organization responsible for monitoring
at each stage needs to review the monitoring results and takes necessary actions in case monitoring
results do not satisfy the standard values. The monitoring results will be submitted to DENR and JICA
in accordance with the institutional framework described in Section 2.2.
Table 5.2-1 Frequency and Locations of Environmental Monitoring at Pre-Construction Stage

Monitoring Responsib
Item Monitoring Item Monitoring Method Frequency Package
Site ility
1. Social Environment
Progress of relocation and
Involuntary Check relocation and All UPMO-
payment in accordance with Project sites Monthly
Resettlement* payment records package RMC1
RAP
Vulnerable Groups* Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto
Livelihood and
Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto
Local Economy
Misdistribution of Ditto Ditto Ditto As necessary Ditto Ditto
Benefit and Damage
Local Conflict of Ditto Ditto Ditto As necessary Ditto Ditto
Interests
* Monitoring for Involuntary Resettlement, Vulnerable Groups and Livelihood and Local Economy is to be done by Internal and External
Monitoring defined in RAP.
Source: JK-JV
48
Table 5.2-2 Frequency and Locations of Environmental Monitoring at Construction Stage

Monitoring Environmental Requirement
Implementing Responsible
Item Monitoring Item Package Concerned
Method Site Frequency Level Organization Organization
Regulation
1. Pollution
Air Quality i) Level of TSP, Site At 2 measurement Quarterly Package I-1 TSP ➢ Clean Air Contractor UPMO-RMC1
NO2, SO2, CO2 measurement points: 1 hr – 300 μ/Ncm Act (RA of DPWH
and CO using the ➢ Beginning 24 hr – 230 μ/Ncm 8749)
following point of SO2 ➢ DENR AO
methods: Package I-1, 1 hr – 340 μ/Ncm #14, S. 1993
➢ TSP - ➢ Ending point of 24 hr – 180 μ/Ncm
Gravimetric Package I-1 NO2
Method; 1 hr – 260 μ/Ncm
➢ SO2 - 24 hr – 150 μ/Ncm
Pararosanili CO
ne Method; 1 hr – 30 ppm
➢ NO2 - 24 hr – (Every 8
Griess hrs) 9 ppm
Saltzman
Reaction;
➢ CO - Direct
Reading
(Gas
Analyzer)
Ditto Ditto At 2 measurement Ditto Package I-2 Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto
points:
➢ In front of
Univ. of
Southern
Philippines
(USeP) along
Davo-
Bukidnon
National
49

Regulation
Highway,
Brgy. Mintal
➢ Beginning of
the Project
along the
Davao Digos
National
Highway,
500m south of
Lipadas
Bridge, Brgy.
Sirawan
point:
➢ Residential
area around
Station 23+900
➢ Residential
area around
Station 27+900
Water Quality Level of pH, DO, Oil Site At 9 measurement Quarterly Package I-1 pH: 6.5 to 8.5 DENR AO No. Contractor UPMO-RMC1
(Surface Water) & Grease, BOD, Fecal measurement points: DO: 5.0 mg/L 34 of DPWH
Coliform/ Total in accordance [Davao River] Oil & Grease: 2.0 (Water Quality
Coliform, and TSS with the ➢ 1 location at mg/L Criteria for
methodologies 100 m BOD: 7.0 mg/L Inland
described in upstream from TSS: not more than Waters Class C)
DAO 34- 1990 the proposing 30 g/L increase
and EMB- bridge location
DENR, Manual ➢ 2 locations at
for Ambient 100 m
Water Quality downstream
Monitoring from the
Volume I
50

Regulation
proposing
bridge location
[Matina River-1]
➢ 1 point at
100m upstream
from the
proposing
bridge location
➢ 1 point at
100m
downstream
from the
proposing
bridge location
[Matina River-2]
➢ 1 point at
100m upstream
from the
proposing
bridge location
➢ 1 point at
100m
downstream
from the
proposing
bridge location
[Tunnel
Construction
Section]
➢ 1 point at
upstream of
tunnel section
51

Regulation
➢ 1 point at
Station 22+200
points at Talomo
River:
➢ 1 point at
100m upstream
from proposing
bridge location
➢ 1 point at
100m
downstream
from proposing
bridge location
point at Lasang
River:
➢ 1 point at
100m upstream
from the
proposing
bridge location
➢ 1 point at
100m
downstream
from the
proposing
bridge location
Water Quality Volume and water Site At 2 measurement Quarterly Package I-1 pH: 6.5 to 8.5 DENR AO No. Contractor UPMO-RMC1
(Groundwater)1 level measurement points around DO: 5.0 mg/L 34 of DPWH
in accordance ➢ 1 point at the BOD: 7.0 mg/L (Water Quality
with the existing well TSS: not more than Criteria for
methodologies for observation 30 g/L increase Inland
described in of groundwater Waters Class C)
52

Regulation
DAO 34- 1990 level at Station
and EMB- 20+350
DENR, Manual ➢ 1 point at the
for Ambient existing water
Water Quality tank at Station
Monitoring 20+350 for
Volume I local residents
Waste Volume and type of Check records Cutting land As per All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
waste, cutting tree and of amount and section, tunnel disposal of of DPWH
domestic garbage type of waste, section, tutting waste
and disposal tree section and
method worker’s camp
Noise Ambient and road side LAeq, 10min during Same as Air Quarterly Package I-1 For “AA” Contractor UPMO-RMC1
noise (dB(A)LAeq) morning, Quality categorized of DPWH
daytime, areas (an area
evening and requires quietness,
night time such as an area
within 100 m from
school sites, nursery
schools, hospitals,
places of worships,
and special homes
for the aged)
Morning: 45 db
Daytime: 50 db
Evening: 45 db
Night Time: 40 db
For “A” categorized
areas (general areas)
Morning: 50 db
Daytime: 55 db
Evening: 50 db
Night Time: 45 db
areas (directly
53

Regulation
facing/fronting a 4-
lane road)
Morning: 50 db
Daytime: 60 db
Evening: 50 db
Night Time: 45 db
For “B” categorized
areas (general
commercial areas)
Morning: 60 db
Daytime: 65 db
Evening: 60 db
Night Time: 55 db
Ditto Ditto Same as Air Ditto Package I-2 Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto
Quality
Quality
Ground Volume of Record the Tunnel section Daily Package I-1 - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
Subsidence2 groundwater seepage seepage volume of DPWH
2. Natural Environment
Terrestrial Flora Condition of Visual check of Project site Daily All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
and Fauna vegetation vegetation of DPWH
condition
Aquatic Flora Checking the Same as water Same as water Same as water Same as water Same as water Same as water Contractor UPMO-RMC1
and Fauna conditions of water quality quality quality quality quality quality of DPWH
quality
3. Social Environment
Land Use Condition of tree cut Check site Project sites As necessary All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
condition of DPWH
Water Use - Complaint from - Check Project sites As necessary All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
downstream area complaint of DPWH
- Complaint from records
groundwater users
54

Regulation
Existing Social Complaint from - Check Project sites As necessary All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
Infrastructure surrounding complaint of DPWH
and Service communities records
4. Health and Safety
Infectious - Awareness of - Check Project site As necessary All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
Disease infectious disease records of of DPWH
awareness
activities on
infectious
disease
Occupational - Record of - Check record Project site As necessary All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
Health accidents in the of accidents of DPWH
construction site in the
construction
site
Community - Records of traffic - Check Project site As necessary All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
Health and accidents in the records of of DPWH
Safety surrounding traffic
communities accidents in
the
surrounding
communities
5. Emergency Risk
Flood Condition of flood Check the site One point at Quarterly Package I-1 - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
conditions Davao River of DPWH
Fire Condition of fire Check the site Construction sites As necessary All package - - Contractor UPMO-RMC1
conditions and worker’s camp of DPWH
Notes:
1. Although impact to groundwater is considered as small, monitoring for groundwater shall be done during the construction phase based on a discussion result with a local community.
2. Although impact to ground subsidence due to tunnel construction work is not anticipated, regular monitoring on groundwater seepage will be done as a precaution measure.
Source: NK-JV
55
Table 5.2-3 Frequency and Locations of Environmental Monitoring at Operation Stage

Regulation
1. Pollution
Air Quality Level of TSP, NO2, Site Same as Air Semi-annual (up Package I-1 TSP ➢ Clean Air Region XI of Region XI of
SO2, CO measurement Quality at to 3 years after 1 hr – 300 μ/Ncm Act (RA DPWH DPWH
using the Construction starting 24 hr – 230 μ/Ncm 8749)
following Phase operation) SO2 ➢ DENR AO
methods: 1 hr – 340 μ/Ncm #14, S. 1993
➢ TSP - 24 hr – 180 μ/Ncm
Gravimetri NO2
c Method; 1 hr – 260 μ/Ncm
➢ SO2 - 24 hr – 150 μ/Ncm
Pararosanil
ine
Method;
➢ NO2 -
Griess
Saltzman
Reaction;
➢ CO -
Direct
Reading
(Gas
Analyzer)
Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Package I-2 Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto
Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Package I-3 Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto
Noise Ambient and road side LAeq, 10min Same as Air Semi-annual (up Package I-1 For “AA” Region XI of Region XI of
noise (dB(A)LAeq) during Quality to 3 years after categorized DPWH DPWH
morning, starting
Morning: 45 db
daytime, operation) Daytime: 50 db
evening and Evening: 45 db
night time Night Time: 40 db
56

Regulation
Morning: 50 db
Daytime: 55 db
Evening: 50 db
Night Time: 45 db
areas (directly
facing/fronting a 4-
lane road)
Morning: 50 db
Daytime: 60 db
Evening: 50 db
Night Time: 45 db
For “B” categorized
areas (general
commercial areas)
Morning: 60 db
Daytime: 65 db
Evening: 60 db
Night Time: 55 db
Quality
Quality
2. Health and Safety
Community Project site As necessary All package - - Region XI of Region XI of
Check accident
Health and Accident records DPWH DPWH
records
Safety
3. Emergency Risk
Flood Risk Check drainage Project site As necessary All package - - Region XI of Region XI of
Drainage condition
condition DPWH DPWH
Source: NK-JV
57
CHAPTER 6: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
6.1 Social Development Plan

Social Development Plan (SDP) was developed in the Original EIS as shown in Table 6.1-1, and ECC
stipulated to implement comprehensive SDP. Although alignment was slightly shifted from the one
studied in the Original EIS, overall contents of SDP developed in the Original EIS is not changed since
the concerns are still same at the time of studying the Original EIS. Thus, all concerned parties shall
implement SDP according to description in Table 6.1-1.
58
Table 6.1-1 Social Development Plan

Government Agency/ Non-
Responsible Community
Concern Government Agency and Proponent Indicative Timeline Source of Fund
Member/ Beneficiary
Services
1 Formation of the City ➢ Barangay Chairpersons of ➢ ESSD of DPWH DPWH After updating of RAP Part of Project Cost
Resettlement Implementation affected barangays ➢ DPWH Region XI and
Committee (CRIC) ➢ Presidents of concerned District
Homeowners Association Engineering Offices
➢ Davao City Planning
and Development
Office
3 Relocation of informal settlers (If ➢ Barangay Chairpersons ➢ Davao City Housing NHA Pre-Construction Stage NHA for site
there are any) ➢ Presidents of Office under the development and DPWH
Homeowners Association OCPDC for infrastructure
➢ DSWD development
➢ DPWH
➢ Lingap Para sa Mahirap
Office
➢ Partner Housing POs,
NGOs of Davao City
4 Gender Responsive Livelihood ➢ Barangay Chairpersons ➢ City Cooperative ESSD of DPWH After ECC Issuance LGU Livelihood Office
Training Program ➢ Barangay Kagawad for Development Office
Skills training for construction Livelihood ➢ DSWD
work
Skills training for handicraft ➢ Presidents of ➢ TESDA
making Homeowners Association
Skills training for food preparation ➢ Officers of Women’s
➢ organizations
5 Formation of/Support to Farmers ➢ Barangay Chairman ➢ DPWH ESSD of DPWH Prior to RAP LGU Livelihood
Cooperatives ➢ Presidents of City and ➢ DTI Implementation Office
Barangay farmers ➢ Cooperative
associations or Development Authority
organizations (CDA)
59
Government Agency/ Non-

Responsible Community
Concern Government Agency and Proponent Indicative Timeline Source of Fund
Member/ Beneficiary
Services
6 Health and Safety ➢ Barangay Chairman ➢ City Health Office ➢ DEO of DPWH Pre-Construction, LGU Health Office
➢ Barangay Kagawad for ➢ DSWD ➢ ESSD of DPWH Construction, Operation
Health and Safety ➢ Barangay Health Stage
Centers
7 Environment and Sanitation ➢ Barangay Chairman ➢ LGU ➢ DEO of DPWH Pre-Construction, LGU CENRO
➢ Barangay Kagawad for ➢ CENRO ➢ ESSD of DPWH Construction, Operation
Environment and ➢ DENR Region XI Stage
Sanitation
8 Peace and Order ➢ Barangay Chairman ➢ LGU ➢ ESSD of DPWH Pre-Construction, LGU & PNP
➢ Barangay Kagawad for ➢ PNP ➢ DEO of DPWH Construction, Operation
Peace and Order; and Stage
➢ Homeowners Association
Sargent-at- Arms
9 Spiritual ➢ Barangay Chairman; ➢ Parish Priests ➢ DEO of DPWH Pre-Construction, LGU

➢ Parish Pastoral Council; ➢ LGU ➢ ESSD of DPWH Construction, Operation
➢ Leaders of other Stage
religious groups
Source: Compiled by NK-JV based on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Davao City Bypass Construction Project (October 2014)
60
Attachment-1 List of Flora recorded by JICA FS
Family Official Common Scientific Name Habit DAO 2007- IUCN Endemicity
Name 01 Redlist
2013
Acanthaceae Acanthus Acanthus hirsutus Herbs – – Not Endemic
Acanthaceae Bunlaw Justicia gendarussa Shrub – – Not Endemic
Acanthaceae Sanchezia Sanchezia speciosa Shrub – – Not Endemic
Acanthaceae White Funnel Ruellia metziae Herbs – – Not Endemic
Acaranthus
Amaranthaceae Kulitis Amaranthus viridus L. Herbs – Least Not Endemic
Concern
Anarcadiaceae Mangga Mangifera indica Tree – – Not Endemic
Annonaceae Basikong Alphonsea arborea Tree – – Not Endemic
Kalawang
Annonaceae Ilang-Ilang Cananga odorata Tree – – Endemic
Apocynaceae Calumpang Catharanthus pusillus Tree – – Not Endemic
Apocynaceae Hingiw Ichnocarpus volubilis Vines – – Not Endemic
Apocynaceae Pandakaki Tabernaemontana Shrub – – Not Endemic
Tsina divaricata (Linn.) E. Br.
Apocynaceae Tubli Derris tubli Linn. Vines – – Not Endemic
Araceae Aglaonema Aglaonema spp. Herbs – Least Not Endemic
Concern
Araceae Alupayi Homalomena pygmaea Aroids – – Not Endemic
Araceae Kamay Kastila Syngonium podophyllum Aroids – – Not Endemic
Schott.
Araceae Pihau Schimatoglottis spp. Herbs – – Not Endemic
Araliaceae Malapapaya Polyscias nodosa Tree – Least Not Endemic
(Blume) Seem. Concern
Arecaceae African Oil Elaeis guineensis Palms – – Not Endemic
Palm
Arecaceae Ditaan Daemonorops mollis Vines – – Not Endemic
(Blanco) Merr.
Arecaceae Fishtail Palm Caryota mitis Palms – – Not Endemic
Arecaceae Niyog Cocos nucifera L. Palms – – Not Endemic
Arecaceae Palasan Calamus maximus L. Vines – – Not Endemic
AT 1-1
Name 01 Redlist
2013
Arecaceae Pugahan Caryota cumingii L. Palms – – Not Endemic
Asclepiadaceae Milkweed Ascelpias syriaca Herbs – – Not Endemic
Asclepiadaceae Tayom- Marsdenia tinctoria R. Shrub – – Not Endemic
Tayom Br.
Asparagaceae Pony Tail Beaucarnea recurvata Palms – – Not Endemic
Palm
Asparagaceae Song of India Dracaena reflexa L. Herbs – – Not Endemic
Aspleniaceae Asplenium Asplenium azoricum Ferns – – Not Endemic
Aspleniaceae Bird's Nest Aspleniu australasicum Ferns – – Not Endemic
Fern
Aspleniaceae Maidenhair Asplenium tenerum Ferns – – Not Endemic
Fern Forst.
Dwarf Helianthus gracilentus Herbs – – Not Endemic
Asteraceae Sunflower
Hagonoy Chromolaena odorata Vines – – Not Endemic
Asteraceae (L.) R.M.
Asteraceae Sambong Blumea balsamifera (L.) Herbs – – Not Endemic
DC
Asteraceae Wedelia Wedelia chinensis Herbs – – Not Endemic
Athyriaceae Pako Diplazium esculentum Ferns – Least Not Endemic
(Retz.) Sw. Concern
Bignoniaceae African Tulip Spathodea campanulata Tree – – Not Endemic
Blechnaceae Diliman/Hagn Stenochlaena melnei Ferns – – Not Endemic
aya Underw.
Burseraceae Bogo Garuga floribunda Tree – – Not Endemic
Canabaceae Anabiong Trema orientalis (L.) Tree – Least Not Endemic
Blume Concern
Caricaceae Wild Papaya Carica papaya Tree – – Not Endemic
Clusiaceae Guyong- Cratoxylum blancoi Tree – – Not Endemic
guyong
Combretaceae Kalamansanai Terminalia Tree – – Endemic
calamansanai
Convolvulaceae Bulakan Merremia peltata L. Vines – – Not Endemic
AT 1-2
Name 01 Redlist
2013
Convolvulaceae Kamkamote Ipomoea triloba L. Vines – – Not Endemic
Convolvulaceae Kupit-Kupit Merrremia emarginata Herbs – – Not Endemic
Convolvulaceae Malakamote Ipomoea obscura L. Vines – – Not Endemic
Convolvulaceae Spanish Flag Ipomoea lobata Vines – – Not Endemic
Costaceae Step Ladder Herbs – – Not Endemic
Plant Costus malortieanus
Cyperacaea Arat Scleria scrobiculata Sedges – – Not Endemic
Nees
Davalliaceae Solida Davallia solida (Forst.) Ferns – – Not Endemic
Sw.
Dioscoreaceae Nami Dioscorea hispida L. Vines – – Not Endemic
Ebenaceae Bolong Eta Diospyros pilosanthera Tree EN – Indigenous
Euphorbiaceae Alim Melanolepis Tree – – Not Endemic
multiglandulosa
Euphorbiaceae Balitahan Bridelia glauca Tree – – Not Endemic
Euphorbiaceae Cassava Manihot esculenta Shrub – – Not Endemic
Euphorbiaceae Hamindang Macaranga bicolor Tree – – Not Endemic
Muell.-Arg.
Euphorbiaceae Kamot Pusa Caesalpinia latisiliqua Herbs – – Not Endemic
Euphorbiaceae Malabagang Glochidian album Shrub – – Not Endemic
(Blanco) Boerl.
Euphorbiaceae Matang Hipon Breynia rhamnoides Shrub – – Not Endemic
(Retz.) Muell.-Arg.
Euphorbiaceae Poinsettia Euphorbia pulcherrima Shrub – – Not Endemic
Euphorbiaceae Soro- Herbs – – Not Endemic
sampalok Euphorbia neriiflora
Euphorbiaceae Tawa-Tawa Euphorbia hirta Herbs – – Not Endemic
Euphorbiaceae Tuba-Tuba Jatropha curcas Shrub – – Not Endemic
Euphorbiaceae Takip Asin Macaranga grandifolia Tree – – Not Endemic
(Blanco) Merr.
Euphorbiaceae Teramycin Glochidion pubicarpum Herbs – –
Plant Elm.
Fabaceae Acapulco Cassia alata Shrub – – Not Endemic
AT 1-3
Name 01 Redlist
2013
Fabaceae Agpoi Phanera integrifolia Vines – Least Not Endemic
subsp. cumingiana Concern
Fabaceae Ascova Cytisus scoparius Shrub – – Not Endemic
Fabaceae Tindalo Afzelia rhomboidea Tree EN Vulnerable Indigenous
Fabaceae Centrosema Centrosema plumeiri Vines – – Not Endemic
Fabaceae Hairy-leafed Centrosema pubescens Vines – – Not Endemic
centrosema L.
Fabaceae Ipil-Ipil Leucaena leucocephala Tree – – Not Endemic
Fabaceae Kawati Gliricidia sepium Tree – – Not Endemic
Fabaceae Makahiya Mimosa pudica L. Herbs – Least Not Endemic
Concern
Fabaceae Mani-Manihan Desmodium capitatum Shrub – – Not Endemic
Fabaceae Payang- Desmodium pulchellum Shrub – – Not Endemic
Payang (L.) Desv.
abaceae Prickly Narra Pterocarpus indicus Tree Critically Vulnerable Indigenous
echinus Endangered
Fabaceae Smooth Narra Pterocarpus indicus Tree Critically Vulnerable Indigenous
indicus Endangered
Fabaceae Tayom Indigofera suffruticosa Shrub – – Not Endemic
Mill.
Fabaceae Yellow Arachis duranensis Vines – – Not Endemic
Creeper
Flagellariaceae Balingwai Flgellaria indica L. Vines – – Not Endemic
Gleicheniaceae Kilob Dicranopteris linearis Ferns – – Not Endemic
Gleicheniaceae Sticherous Sticherous truncatus Ferns – – Not Endemic
Fern (Willd.) Nakaii
Gnetaceae Kuliat Gnetum gnemon Vines – Least Not Endemic
Concern
Guttiferae Paguringan Cratoxylon arboreum Tree – – Not Endemic
Icacinaceae Anilaw Gonocaryum Tree
calleryanum/ Colona – –
serratifolia
Lamiaceae Dilang Baka Hypyis capitata Jacq. Herbs – – Not Endemic
AT 1-4
Name 01 Redlist
2013
Lamiaceae Gmelina Gmelina arborea Tree – – Not Endemic
Lamiaceae Molaveng Aso Vitex cofassus Tree – – Not Endemic
Lamiaceae Turukan Hyptis capitata Jacq. Herbs – – Not Endemic
Lauraceae Marang Litsea perrottettii Tree – – Not Endemic
Leguminosae Brazilian Fire Schizolobium parahyba Tree – – Not Endemic
Tree
Loganiaceae Strychnos Strychnos multiflora L. Vines – – Not Endemic
vine
Lycopodiaceae Lycopodium **Lycopodium spp. Fern (En/Vul) – Not Endemic
Allies
Lygodiaceae Nito Lygodium flexuosum (L.) Vines – – Endemic
Sm.
Lygodiaceae Nitong Hapon Lygodium japonicum Vines – – Not Endemic
Lythraceae Luktob Duabanga moluccana Tree – – Not Endemic
Malvaceae Balobo Diplodiscus paniculatus Tree – Vulnerable Endemic
Malvaceae Banalo Thespesia populnea Tree – – Not Endemic
Malvaceae Biknong Kleinhovia hospita Tree – – Not Endemic
Malvaceae Cacao Theobroma cacao Tree – Least Not Endemic
Concern
Malvaceae Malubago HIbiscus tiliaceus Tree – – Not Endemic
Malvaceae Tan-ag Kleinhovia hospita Tree – – Not Endemic
Malvaceae Walis-walisan Sida acuta Burm. f. Herbs – – Not Endemic
Marantaceae Bamban Donax cannaeformis Herbs – – Not Endemic
Marattiaceae Giant Fern Marattia sylvatica Bl. Ferns – – Not Endemic
Meliaceae Igyu Dysoxylum daeandrum Tree – – Not Endemic
Menispermace ae Ligtang Anamirta cocculus Vines – –
Menispermace ae Cyclea Cyclea merrilli Sedges – – Not Endemic
Moraceae Alangas Ficus heteropoda Miq. Tree – – Not Endemic
Moraceae Antipolo Artocarpus blancoi Tree – Least Endemic
(Elmer) Merr. Concern
Moraceae Basikong Ficus botryocarpa Miq. Tree – – Not Endemic
AT 1-5
Name 01 Redlist
2013
Moraceae Ficus variegate Blume Tree – – Not Endemic
Dulalug var. sycomoroides
(Miq.)
Moraceae Ficus spp. Ficus lanceolata Tree – – Not Endemic
Moraceae Hagimit Ficus minahassae Tree – – Not Endemic
Moraceae Hawili Ficus septica Burma f. Shrub – – Not Endemic
var. septica
Moraceae Isis Ficus ulmifolia Tree – Vulnerable Endemic
Moraceae Malagumihan Artocarpus elasticus Tree – – Not Endemic
Moraceae Malatibig Ficus congesta var. Tree – – Not Endemic
congesta
Moraceae Niyug-niyugan Ficus pseudopalma Tree – Least Endemic
Blanco Concern
Moraceae Tangisang Ficus variegata Blume Tree – – Not Endemic
Bayawak var. variegata
Moraceae Tangisang Tree – – Not Endemic
Layugan Ficus latsonii
Moraceae Tibig Ficus nota (Blanco) Tree – – Endemic
Merr.
Moraceae Kalokoy Ficus callosa Tree – –
Myrtaceae Bayabas Psidium guajava Tree – – Not Endemic
Myrtaceae Binunga Tristaniopsis dicorticata Tree – – Not Endemic
Nephrolepidaceae Alulukdo Nephrolepis hirsutula Ferns – Least Not Endemic
Concern
Nephrolepidaceae Christella Christella parasitica Ferns – – Not Endemic
(Lindl.) Lev.
Oleandraceae Pakong- Nephrolepis biserrta Ferns – – Not Endemic
kalabaw (Sw.) Schott.
Osmundaceae Osmunda/Roy Osmunda banksiifolia Ferns – – Not Endemic
al Fern (C. Prosl.) Kuhn.
Pandanaceae Bariu Pandanus copelandii Pandans – – Not Endemic
Merr.
Pandanaceae Pandan- Pandanus exaltatus Pandans – – Not Endemic
AT 1-6
Name 01 Redlist
2013
layugan Blanco
Passifloraceae Pasiflora Pasiflora spp. Vines – – Not Endemic
Piperaceae Palo Verde Piper arborescens Tree – – Not Endemic
Piperaceae Pamintang- Piper interruptum Opiz. Vines – – Not Endemic
aso
Piperaceae Piper Piper spp. Vines – – Not Endemic
Poaceae Amorseco Andropogon aciculatos Grasses – – Not Endemic
Poaceae Bikal Dinochlea acutiflora Grasses – – Not Endemic
(Munro) S. Dransf.
Poaceae Carabao Paspalum conjugatum Grasses – Least Not Endemic
Grass Berg. Concern
Poaceae Carpet Grass Axonopus fissifolius Grasses – – Not Endemic
Poaceae Cat's Tail Typha orientalis Grasses – Least Not Endemic
Concern
Poaceae Cogon Imperata cylindrica var. Grasses – – Not Endemic
koenigii
Poaceae Crab Grass Digitaria sanguinalis Grasses – – Not Endemic
Poaceae Fishing Rod Schizostachyum lima Grasses – – Not Endemic
Bamboo (Blanco) Merr.
Poaceae Johnson Sorghum halapense Grasses – – Not Endemic
Grass
Poaceae Nut Grass Cyperus rotundus Grasses – – Not Endemic
Poaceae Paragis Eleusine indica (L.) Grasses – Least Not Endemic
Gaertn. Concern
Poaceae Pusher Schizostachyum fennixii Grasses – – Not Endemic
Bamboo
Poaceae Talahib Saacharum spontaneum Grasses – – Not Endemic
L.
Poaceae Tambo Thysonolaena latifolia Grasses – – Not Endemic
(Roxb. Ex Hornem.)
Honda
Poaceae Whipping Grasses – – Not Endemic
Grass Sporobolus indicus L.
AT 1-7
Name 01 Redlist
2013
Polypodaceae Kabkab/Oak- Drynaria quercifolia (L.) Ferns VUL – Not Endemic
Leaf Fern Sm.
Polypodaceae Thai Fern Microsorum Ferns – – Not Endemic
thailandicum
Rhamnaceae Salapao Ventilago dichotoma Vines – – Not Endemic
Rubiaceae Bangkal Nauclea orientalis Tree – – Not Endemic
Rubiaceae Dilang Butiki Dentella repens Herbs – – Not Endemic
Rubiaceae Kahoy Dalaga Mussaenda philippica Tree – – Not Endemic
A.Rich
Rutaceae Kalamansi Citrofortunella Tree – – Not Endemic
microcarpa
Salicaceae Aninguai Scolopia luzoniensis Vines – –
(Presl.) Merr.
Sapindaceae Kapulasan Nephelium mutabile Tree – – Not Endemic
Sapindaceae Large Leaf Pometia pinnata Tree – – Not Endemic
Malugay
Sapotaceae Kaimito Chrysophyllum cainito Tree – – Not Endemic
Selaginellaceae Kamariang Selaganella planna Fern – – Not Endemic
Gubat Hieron Allies
Selaginellaceae Selaginella Selaginella involvens Ferns – – Not Endemic
(Sw.) Spreng
olanaceae Malatalong Solanum verbascifolim Shrub – – Not Endemic
Linn.
Sterculiaceae Bayok Pterospermum Tree – – Not Endemic
diversifolium
Sterculiaceae Labayo Commersonia Shrub – – Not Endemic
platyphylla
Sterculiaceae Taloto Pterocymbium Tree – – Not Endemic
tinctorium
Sterculiaceae U-us Sterculia glabrifolia Tree – – Not Endemic
Thelypteridaceae Cristella Fern Christella dentata Ferns – – Not Endemic
Tiliaceae Kulot-kulotan Triumfetta rhomboidea Herbs – – Not Endemic
Jacq.
AT 1-8
Name 01 Redlist
2013
Urticaceae Alagasi Leucosyke capitellata Shrub – Least Endemic
Concern
Urticaceae Rami Boehmeria nivea Herbs – – Not Endemic
Verbenaceae Coronitas Lantana camara Herbs – – Not Endemic
Verbenaceae Kandikandilaa Stachytarpheta Herbs – – Not Endemic
n jamaicacensis
Verbenaceae Magilik Premna cumingiana Tree – – Not Endemic
Verbenaceae Molave Vitex parviflora Tree EN Vulnerable Indigenous
Verbenaceae White Kandi- Stachytarpheta Herbs – – Not Endemic
kandilaan jamaicensis Linn.
Vitaceae Alangingi Cayratia guineensis Vines – – Not Endemic
G.Don
Vitaceae Ayo Terrastigma harmandii Vines – –
Vitaceae Kaliantan Leea philippinensis Tree – – Endemic
Zingiberaceae Tagbak Alpinia elegans L. Zingibers – – Not Endemic
Bataran Grass
Kulot-Kulot
Lupog-Lupog
Source: Source: Compiled by NK-JV based on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Davao City Bypass
AT 1-9
Attachment-2: List of Fauna
1. Birds recorded by the 1st Site Survey (April 2014) for the Original EIS
Relative Abundance
Common Name Scientific Name Abundance
(%)
Glossy Swiftlet Collocalia esculenta 76 22.26
Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus 40 11.90
Yellow-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus goiavier 38 11.31
Red-keeled Flowerpecker Dicaeum australe 30 8.93
White-eared Brown-dove Phapitreron leucotis 21 6.25
Olive-backed Sunbird Nectarinia jugularis 17 5.06
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis 15 4.46
White-collared Kingfisher Halcyon chloris 15 4.46
Chestnut Munia Lonchura malacca 13 3.87
Pied Fantail Rhipidura javanica 12 3.57
Philippine Coucal Centropus viridis 9 2.68
Pygmy Swiftlet Collocalia troglodytes 6 1.79
Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus 4 1.19
White-breasted Wood-swallow Artamus leucorynchus 5 1.49
Brahminy Kite Haliastur indus 4 1.19
Coppersmith Barbet Megalaima haemacephala 4 1.19
Striated Grassbird Megalurus palustris 4 1.19
Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava 4 1.19
Asian Glossy Starling Aplonis panayensis 3 0.89
Grey-tailed Tattler Heteroscelus brevipes 2 0.60
Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus 2 0.60
Silvery Kingfisher Alcedo argentata 2 0.60
Temminck's Stint Calidris temminckii 2 0.60
White-bellied Munia Lonchura leucogastra 2 0.60
Zebra Dove Geopelia striata 2 0.60
Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos 1 0.30
Little Egret Egretta garzetta 1 0.30
Philipine Frogmouth Batrachostomus septimus 1 0.30
Pied Buschat Saxicola caprata 1 0.30
Total 336 100.00

AT 2-1
2. List of Birds recorded by the 2nd Survey (February 2015) for the Original EIS
Relative Abundance
Common Name Scientific Name Abundance
(%)
Glossy Swiftlet Collocalia esculenta 6 8.82
Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus 4 5.88
Yellow-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus goiavier 12 17.65
Red-keeled Flowerpecker Dicaeum australe 1 1.47
White-eared Brown-dove Phapitreron leucotis 1 1.47
Olive-backed Sunbird Nectarinia jugularis 2 2.94
White-collared Kingfisher Halcyon chloris 1 1.47
Chestnut Munia Lonchura malacca 5 7.35
Pied Fantail Rhipidura javanica 2 2.94
Philippine Coucal Centropus viridis 1 1.47
Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus 2 2.94
White-breasted Wood-swallow Artamus leucorynchus 4 5.88
Coppersmith Barbet Megalaima haemacephala 6 8.82
Striated Grassbird Megalurus palustris 4 5.88
Asian Glossy Starling Aplonis panayensis 4 5.88
Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus 1 1.47
Silvery Kingfisher Alcedo argentata 2 2.94
Zebra Dove Geopelia striata 4 5.88
Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos 3 4.41
Pied Buschat Saxicola caprata 1 1.47
Pied Triller Lalage nigra 2 2.94
Total 68 100.00
AT 2-2
3. List of Amphibians recorded by the Field Survey for the Original EIS
Site Rel.
Family Common Name Scientific Name Total Abundance
1 2 3 4 (%)
Bufonidae Cane Toad Bufo marinus 15 15 15 8 53 71.62
Dicroglossidae Crab-eating Frog Rana cancrivora 12 3 3 18 24.32
Microhylidae Black- Kalophrynus 1 1 1.35

spotted pleurostigma
sticky frog
Raniidae Variable- Rana signata 1 1 1.35

backed Frog
Microhylidae Slender- Kaloula picta 1 1 1.35

digit Chorus
Frog
Total 28 19 18 9 74 100.00
Note: Lasang River, Brgy. Communal; 2 – Lipadas River, Bangkas Heights; 3 – Matina River, Brgy. Langub; 4 –
Tunnel Site, Brgy. Matina Biao
Source: Compiled by NK-JV based on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Davao City Bypass Construction
Project (October 2014)
4. List of Bats recorded by the Field Survey for the Original EIS
Site Relative
Family Common Name Scientific Name Total
1 2 3 Abundance (%)
Geoffroy’s Rousettus 6 12.00

Pteropodidae 6
Rousette amplexicaudatus
Lesser Dog- Cynopterus 32 64.00

Pteropodidae 22 5 5
faced Fruit Bat brachyotis
Greater Musky Ptenochyrus 10 20.00

Pteropodidae 5 5
Fruit Bat jagori
Pteropodidae Dagger-toothed Macroglossus 1 1 2 4.00
Long-nosed Fruit minimus
Bat
Total 34 5 11 50 100.00
Note: Lasang River, Brgy. Communal; 2 – Lipadas River, Bangkas Heights; 3 – Matina River, Brgy. Langub; 4 –
Tunnel Site, Brgy. Matina Biao
AT 2-3
5. Conservation Status of Fauna recorded by the Field Survey for the Original EIS
IUCN Redlist
Family Name Species Name Common Name Residency Status
(2014)
Birds
Ardeidae Egretta garzetta Little Egret Migrant Least Concern
Ardeidae Cattle Egret Resident/ Least Concern
Bubulcus ibis Migrant
Accipitridae Haliastur indus Brahminy Kite Resident Least Concern
Phasianidae Gallus gallus Red Junglefowl Resident Least Concern
Scolopacidae Heteroscelus brevipes Grey-tailed Tattler Migrant Least Concern
Scolopacidae Calidris temminckii Temminck’s Stint Migrant-Rare Least Concern
Columbidae Phapitreron leucotis White-eared Brown-dove Endemic Least Concern
Columbidae Geopelia striata Zebra Dove Resident Least Concern

Cuculidae Centropus viridis Philippine Coucal Endemic Least Concern
Podargidae Batrachostomus septimus Philippine Frogmouth Endemic Least Concern
Apodidae Collocalia esculenta Glossy Swiftlet Resident Least Concern
Apodidae Collocalia Pygmy Swiftlet Endemic Least Concern

troglodytes
Alcedinidae Alcedo argentata Silvery Kingfisher Endemic Vulnerable
Alcedinidae Halcyon chloris White-collared Kingfisher Endemic Least Concern

Capitonidae Megalaima Coppersmith Barbet Resident Least Concern
haemacephala
Pycnonotidae Pycnonotus goiavier Yellow-vented Bulbul Resident Least Concern
Corvidae Corvus macrorhynchos Large-billed Crow Resident Least Concern
Turdidae Saxicola caprata Pied Buschat Resident Least Concern

Meropidae Merops philippinus Blue-tailed Bee-eater Resident Least Concern
Sylviidae Megalurus palustris Striated Grassbird Resident Least Concern
Muscicapidae Rhipidura javanica Pied Fantail Resident Least Concern
Motacillidae Yellow Wagtail Migrant Least Concern

Motacilla flava
Artamidae Artamus White-breasted Wood- Resident Least Concern
leucorynchus swallow
Sturnidae Aplonis panayensis Asian Glossy Starling Resident Least Concern
Nectariniidae Nectarina jugularis Olive-backed Sunbird Resident Least Concern
Dicaeidae Dicaeum australe Red-keeled Flowerpecker Endemic Least Concern
AT 2-4
IUCN Redlist
Family Name Species Name Common Name Residency Status
(2014)
Ploceidae Passer montanus Eurasian Tree Sparrow Resident Least Concern
Estrildidae Lonchura White-bellied Munia Resident Least Concern

leucogastra
Estrildidae Lonchura Malacca Chestnut Munia Resident Least Concern
Amphibians
Bufonidae Bufo marinus American Bullfrog Introduced Least
Concern
Dicroglossida e Rana cancrivora Crab-eating Frog Resident Least
Concern
Microhylidae Kalophrynus Black-spotted sticky frog Least
pleurostigma Concern
Raniidae Rana signata Variable-backed Frog Resident Least
Concern
Microhylidae Kaloula picta Slender-digit Chorus Resident Least
Frog Concern
Bats
Pteropodidae Rousettus amplexicaudatus Geoffroy’s Rousette Resident Least
Concern
Pteropodidae Cynopterus brachyotis Lesser Dog-faced Resident Least
Fruit Bat Concern
Pteropodidae Ptenochyrus jagori Greater Musky Fruit Bat Endemic Least
Concern
Pteropodidae Macroglossus minimus Dagger-toothed Resident Least
Long- nosed Fruit Concern
Bat
Source: Compiled by NK-JV based on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Davao City Bypass Construction
Project (October 2014)
AT 2-5

c8h0vm0000f4lwhr PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

c8h0vm0000f4lwhr PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS

Consulting Services for the Detailed Design and Tender Assistance

Joint Venture of:

CHAPTER 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................... 5

Table 1.3-1 Project Outline Designed in FS 2014 ................................................................... 5

Figure 1.3-1 Sections of Shifting Alignment .......................................................................... 10

Figure 1.3-8 Typical Cross Section of Overpass Bridge ....................................................... 16

BC Before Construction Stage

CHAPTER 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1.1 Objective of Updating Environmental Impact Statement

1.2 Implementation Organization of Environmental Impact Assessment

1.3 Project Outline

Table 1.3-1 Project Outline Designed in FS 2014

Package I was modified in this DED as shown in Table 1.3-2.

Table 1.3-2 Project Outline Modified in DED

(2) Modification of Project Description from JICA FS

Table 1.3-3 Major Modification of Package I Design

Total 5 Sections of Alighment Shifting (General)

2. Station 9+200 to 10+000

Proposed Route of Land

Mini-Hydro Power Plant

The proposed alignment atRealignment Proposal of Land Owner (Dakudau-Locsin Property)

(3) Latest Project Description

Table 1.3-4 Latest Description of the Project

Intersection-15: STA 11+055

Overpass-1: STA 3+814 Overpass-4: STA 17+385 Overpass-6: STA 27+859

Overpass-2: STA 5+668 Overpass-5: STA 18+890 -

- Bridge type: PC flat slab - Bridge type: PC flat slab

Overpass-3: STA 9+049 Box culvert-2: STA 22+370

Interchange: STA 12+120 Toll Gate: STA 22+700

- L=150m, W=9.54m - L=70m, W=8.84m

Cut & Cover Tunnel – 1

Table 1.3-5 Outline of River Works

Table 1.3-6 Outline of Candidate Disposal Sites

* The area delineated in white line is the candidate site.

* The area delineated in white line is the candidate site.

* The area delineated in pink line is the candidate site.

* The area delineated in white line is the candidate site.

Photo of Location No. 4 Photo of Location No. 5

3） Arrangement of Relocation Site for Informal Settlers

(4) Construction Method

The planning construction methods are summarized in Table 1.3-7.

Table 1.3-7 Outline of Construction Methods of the Project

Structure Construction Method

(5) Construction Schedule（最新スケジュールを確認後に記載）

1.4 Target of Updated EIS

Table 1.4-1 Project Area

CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF POLICY, LEGAL AND

2.1 Policy of Environmental and Social Considerations

2.2 Institutional Framework

2.2.1 Institutional Framework for Environmental Management

Table 2.2-1 Responsibilities of the Relevant Parties at Each Stage

Project Stage Organization Responsibility

ESSD UPMO-RMC1 (Bi-Lateral) DPWH

MULTI-PARTITE MONITORING TEAM (MMT)

CHAPTER 3: BASELINE NATURAL AND SOCIAL

3.1 Physical Natural and Social Enviromental Conditions

(1) Land Use

Table 3.1-1 Summary of Land Use in the Project Area

(2) Topography and Geology

(4) Flora and Fauna

*S20 is located at Matina River, Brgy. Matina Biao (Tunnel Site).