Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter # 3 Past Papers Solutions
Chapter # 3 Past Papers Solutions
Capacity of Parties
1 Aliya’s brother is justified in refusing the delivery to Salma, if at the time of making the agreement,
Aliya was:
- not capable of understanding it; and
- not capable of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon her interests.
If Aliya is usually of unsound mind but occasionally of sound mind then she may enter into a contract
when she is of sound mind. However, if she was of unsound mind, then the agreement would be void.
2 Disqualified Persons
Following persons are disqualified from entering into the contract though they are major and of
sound mind:
(iii) Convicts
A convict while under imprisonment is incapable of contracting.
1 Agreement
Every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other, is an agreement.
An agreement not enforceable by law is said to be void.
Consideration
Completed gift:
In case of a gift it needs to be completed. The rule ‘No consideration no contract’ does not apply to
completed gifts.
However, in the given scenario, Furqan Butt only made a promise to pay Rs. 2 million by way of a gift
and did not actually pay the amount. Similarly, the promise was not made in writing and was not
registered, therefore, the promise cannot be enforced in both of the above circumstances and Muneer
cannot recover anything from his uncle Furqan Butt.
(i) Gift
(ii) love and affection
Completed gift:
In case of a gift it needs to be completed. The rule ‘No consideration no contract’ does not apply to
completed gifts.
However, in the given scenario, Nadeem only made a promise to pay Rs. 1.0 million by way of a gift
and did not actually pay the amount. Similarly, the promise was not made in writing and was not
registered, therefore, the promise cannot be enforced in both of the above circumstances and Mrs.
Ikram cannot recover anything from her grandfather Nadeem.
B.Law (CAF - 3) Page | 121 ICAP Recommended Answers
4 Tahir’s suit will not be admitted by the Court because if the performance of a promise is contingent
upon the mere will and pleasure of the promisor, there is no contract. The rule of law is that
“agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or capable of being made certain, are void.”
5 A is liable to B for damages as A had agreed to sell the motorcycle willingly; hence the contract is not
void merely because the consideration is inadequate.