Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objective: To assess the effect of delivering high-flow nasal can- bronchiolitis, and various forms of noninvasive respiratory
nula flow on end-expiratory lung volume, continuous distending therapy have been used in its treatment (2). Continuous posi-
pressure, and regional ventilation distribution in infants less than tive airways pressure (CPAP) has been used to decrease the
12 months old with bronchiolitis. work of breathing, improve functional residual capacity, and
Design: Prospective observational clinical study. reduce regional atelectasis associated with this disease (3, 4).
Setting: Nineteen bed medical and surgical PICU. CPAP can be delivered via nasopharyngeal tube or face mask
Patients: Thirteen infants with bronchiolitis on high-flow nasal therapy. and generated by a water column (bubble CPAP) or a dedi-
Interventions: The study infants were measured on a flow rate cated CPAP driver (5). Despite the acknowledged clinical use-
applied at 2 and 8 L/min through the high-flow nasal cannula system. fulness of nasal CPAP, uncertainties regarding aspects of its
Measurements and Results: Ventilation distribution was measured application remain. Furthermore, defining the optimal nasal
with regional electrical impedance amplitudes and end-expiratory CPAP system is complicated by the multiplicity of nasal CPAP
lung volume using electrical impedance tomography. Changes in devices and techniques available to the clinician (6).
continuous distending pressure were measured from the esophagus Recently high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has been
via the nasogastric tube. Physiological variables were also recorded. introduced to provide respiratory support in infants (7–9).
High-flow nasal cannula delivered at 8 L/min resulted in signifi- HFNC is considered to be the delivery of gas flow rates exceeding
cant increases in global and anterior end-expiratory lung volume 2 L/min. HFNC therapy has many possible advantages over other
(p < 0.01) and improvements in the physiological variables of respi- forms of oxygen therapy: the inspired gas mixture can be heated
ratory rate, Spo2, and Fio2 when compared with flows of 2 L/min. and humidified to reduce damage to the upper airway mucosa;
Conclusion: In infants with bronchiolitis, high-flow nasal cannula the inspired oxygen concentration can be titrated to the patients
oxygen/air delivered at 8 L/min resulted in increases in end-expi- need; anecdotally, it is better tolerated by the patient; and poten-
ratory lung volume and improved respiratory rate, Fio2, and Spo2. tially, CPAP can be delivered (10–13). Studies in neonates have
(Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014; 15:e214–e219) shown that the amount of CPAP delivered by HFNC depends
Key Words: continuous positive airways pressure; electrical on the flow (relative to the size of the patient) and on the leak
impedance tomography; high-flow nasal cannula; oxygen delivery; around the nasal cannula (14). Most studies of HFNC therapy
ventilation distribution have been performed in neonates, and little clinical experience is
reported in older children (7). A number of studies have investi-
gated the effect of HFNC in treating apnoea of prematurity (15),
B
ronchiolitis is the leading cause of pediatric hospital- on the CPAP effect in neonates (14, 16), pharyngeal pressure
ization in Australia and New Zealand and accounts for (12), and its role in the postextubation period (8, 17, 18). Despite
approximately 8,000 admissions annually (1). Respi- its acceptance, the use of HFNC is still controversial and not rec-
ratory support is fundamental to the treatment of severe ommended by some outside of a research protocol (19–22). Of
primary concern is the paucity of available evidence on the effect
1
Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, of HFNC on CPAP and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV).
Mater Children’s Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of HFNC
2
School of Physiotherapy, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, QLD, Australia. flow on CPAP, EELV, regional ventilation distribution, and other
3
Critical Care of the Newborn Program, Mater Research, South Brisbane, respiratory physiological variables in infants with bronchiolitis.
QLD, Australia.
Dr. Schibler’s institution received grant support from Fisher & Paykel
Healthcare. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have
any potential conflicts of interest. METHODS
For information regarding this article, E-mail: judith.hough@mater.org.au
Copyright © 2014 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Study Design
Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies In a prospective interventional study, infants with bronchiolitis
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000112 were measured on and off HFNC.
be delivered. We estimate that 2 L/kg/min may be an adequate low-flow nasal cannula. The GI index as a measure of venti-
flow rate, a flow rate that normally has been used in the past to lation inhomogeneity improved; however, the differences did
titrate the circuit flow in a continuous bypass neonatal ventila- not reach significance (p = 0.053).
tor. The PRP was only moderately reduced on HFNC, which is
not surprising as the PRP is a composite of pressure amplitude Limitations
and respiratory rate. The pressure amplitude as per Figure 3 The study represents a relatively small number of patients. This
increased due to the positive end-expiratory pressure effect of was due to difficulties encountered with data collection, particu-
HFNC but the respiratory rate dropped. We may speculate that larly with relation to noisy signals obtained from the esophageal
the flow rate used in our study was not sufficient to decrease monitoring and the EIT. Despite that we have selected mea-
the work of breathing significantly. This argument may be sup- surement techniques which do not interfere with the patients
ported by the fact that in premature infants, flow rates between breathing, the investigated infants were disturbed when the
5 and 8 L/min are used to reduce the work of breathing in esophagus probe was adjusted or the electrodes applied. Since
babies with a body weight of 1,000 g, which is equivalent to the use of HFNC is becoming more popular in many pediatric
5–8 L/kg/min. Our results are consistent with measurements hospitals, the understanding of the physiological mechanisms
that have recently been published in infants with bronchiolitis is important. Not all changes that we observed were signifi-
using pharyngeal pressure (33). cant, but they certainly were physiologically plausible. One fur-
Another explanation could be that the higher end-expi- ther limitation of the high-flow use is that the variation of the
ratory pressure might be splinting the airways open, helping applied positive airway pressure is greatly affected by air leaks
to decrease expiratory airflow limitation. There have been a that occur around the nasal cannula and through the mouth.
number of studies investigating the effect of change in air- Although EIT measurements in infants are technically
way pressure with increasing flow rates and results have var- challenging with electrode placement difficulties increasing
ied markedly with no consensus reached and concerns still recorded noise, the midthoracic placement of electrodes has
related to uncontrolled airway pressure (11, 12, 14, 34–36), been confirmed by MRI to produce impedance values reflec-
which includes air escaping when the mouth is open. An tive of the entire lung (40).
increase in airway pressure is only one of the mechanisms
thought to responsible for the positive effects of HFNC. How Can High Flow Be Defined?
The variation in results in the literature could be because Based on our findings, adequate flow rates are achieved when
there are alternative mechanisms involved. Other proposed increased positive expiratory Poe were observed and poten-
mechanisms include washout of nasopharyngeal dead space, tially even positive airway pressures during the inspiratory
reduction of inspiratory airflow resistance, improved lung phase. The measurement of Poe for the titration of high flow
mechanics, reduced metabolic work required for gas warm- is clinically too cumbersome, similarly to the routine use of
ing, and humidification (10, 36–38). In situations in which EIT. Based on our and other recent studies, flow rates of greater
the flow delivered by the oxygen delivery method is lower than 1.7 L/min/kg, probably for ease of use 2 L/kg/min, should
than the maximal inspiratory flow of the patient, then an be discussed. These flow rates, however, should be tested in
air leak around the nasal cannula is needed to entrain air. larger studies and investigated whether any benefit can be
Similarly during the expiratory phase, an air leak, either via observed. We cannot yet provide any suggestions to the upper
mouth or around the nasal cannula, is mandatory. These limits of flow rates, but based on our own experience and a just
leak conditions are absolutely mandatory to be present for recently finished pilot study (41), flow rates of 2 L/kg/min for
the safe use of HFNC. infants with bronchiolitis are well tolerated. Artificial limita-
tions of the flow delivery systems have in the past limited the
Effect of HFNC on EELV investigation of higher flow rates.
To our knowledge, this is the first study describing changes in
EELV in infants with bronchiolitis and on HFNC. The change in REFERENCES
EELV in our study was moderate but consistent for all patients. 1. Alexander J, Tregea S, Slater A: Report of the Australian and New
Interestingly, the anterior (nondependent) lung showed the Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry. Brisbane, Australian and
New Zealand Intensive Care Society, 2008
greatest increase. Bronchiolitis per se is associated with hyper- 2. Frey B, Shann F: Oxygen administration in infants. Arch Dis Child
inflation and air trapping due to small airway disease. Hence, Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88:F84–F88
any further increase of EELV seems surprising. First, any posi- 3. Reid LM: Lung growth in health and disease. Br J Dis Chest 1984;
tive airway pressure may recruit previously collapsed alveoli; 78:113–134
microatelectasis is one of the main features of bronchiolitis. 4. Thorsteinsson A, Werner O, Jonmarker C, et al: Airway closure in
anesthetized infants and children: Influence of inspiratory pressures
The CDP then will splint airway passages helping to mitigate and volumes. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46:529–536
the effect of expiratory airflow limitation. These findings mir- 5. Frey B, McQuillan PJ, Shann F, et al: Nasopharyngeal oxygen therapy
ror those found in a cohort of 20 adults who also demonstrated produces positive end-expiratory pressure in infants. Eur J Pediatr
2001; 160:556–560
an increase in global and ventral end-expiratory lung imped-
6. De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B: Devices and pressure sources for
ance variation when placed on HFNC (39). The global and administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in
regional amplitudes were higher on HFNC compared with preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 1:CD002977
7. McKiernan C, Chua LC, Visintainer PF, et al: High flow nasal cannulae impedance tomography (EIT). Proceedings of 2nd European Medical
therapy in infants with bronchiolitis. J Pediatr 2010; 156:634–638 and Biological Engineering Conference, Vienna, Austria, December
8. Campbell DM, Shah PS, Shah V, et al: Nasal continuous positive air- 4–8, 2002
way pressure from high flow cannula versus infant flow for preterm 26. Frerichs I, Pulletz S, Elke G, et al: Assessment of changes in dis-
infants. J Perinatol 2006; 26:546–549 tribution of lung perfusion by electrical impedance tomography.
9. Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, et al: High flow nasal cannula Respiration 2009; 77:282–291
versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: A retrospective 27. Pulletz S, van Genderingen HR, Schmitz G, et al: Comparison of dif-
study. J Perinatol 2007; 27:85–91 ferent methods to define regions of interest for evaluation of regional
10. Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, et al: Research in high flow therapy: lung ventilation by EIT. Physiol Meas 2006; 27:S115–S127
Mechanisms of action. Respir Med 2009; 103:1400–1405 28. Dunlop S, Hough J, Riedel T, et al: Electrical impedance tomogra-
11. Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, et al: High-flow nasal cannula as a phy in extremely prematurely born infants and during high frequency
device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. J oscillatory ventilation analyzed in the frequency domain. Physiol Meas
Perinatol 2007; 27:772–775 2006; 27:1151–1165
12. Wilkinson DJ, Andersen CC, Smith K, et al: Pharyngeal pressure 29. Frerichs I, Schiffmann H, Oehler R, et al: Distribution of lung ventila-
with high-flow nasal cannulae in premature infants. J Perinatol 2008; tion in spontaneously breathing neonates lying in different body posi-
28:42–47 tions. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:787–794
13. Spentzas T, Minarik M, Patters AB, et al: Children with respiratory 30. Zhao Z, Möller K, Steinmann D, et al: Evaluation of an electrical imped-
distress treated with high-flow nasal cannula. J Intensive Care Med ance tomography-based global inhomogeneity index for pulmonary
2009; 24:323–328 ventilation distribution. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:1900–1906
14. Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA: Heated, humidified high-flow nasal 31. Frey U, Stocks J, Coates A, et al: Specifications for equipment used for
cannula therapy: Yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway infant pulmonary function testing. ERS/ATS Task Force on Standards
pressure? Pediatrics 2008; 121:82–88 for Infant Respiratory Function Testing. European Respiratory
15. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, et al: High-flow nasal can- Society/American Thoracic Society. Eur Respir J 2000; 16:
nulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: A comparison with 731–740
conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics 32. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al; National Institutes of Health,
2001; 107:1081–1083 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Network: Comparison
16. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, et al: Observational study of of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute
humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous lung injury or ARDS. Chest 2007; 132:410–417
positive airway pressure. J Pediatr 2009; 154:177–182 33. Milési C, Baleine J, Matecki S, et al: Is treatment with a high flow nasal
17. Woodhead DD, Lambert DK, Clark JM, et al: Comparing two methods cannula effective in acute viral bronchiolitis? A physiologic study.
of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endo- Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:1088–1094
tracheal extubation: A prospective, randomized, masked, crossover 34. Sivieri EM, Gerdes JS, Abbasi S: Effect of HFNC flow rate, cannula
trial. J Perinatol 2006; 26:481–485 size, and nares diameter on generated airway pressures: An in vitro
18. Holleman-Duray D, Kaupie D, Weiss MG: Heated humidified high- study. Pediatr Pulmonol 2013; 48:506–514
flow nasal cannula: Use and a neonatal early extubation protocol. J 35. Arora B, Mahajan P, Zidan MA, et al: Nasopharyngeal airway pres-
Perinatol 2007; 27:776–781 sures in bronchiolitis patients treated with high-flow nasal cannula
19. Dani C, Pratesi S, Migliori C, et al: High flow nasal cannula therapy oxygen therapy. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28:1179–1184
as respiratory support in the preterm infant. Pediatr Pulmonol 2009; 36. Saslow JG, Aghai ZH, Nakhla TA, et al: Work of breathing using high-
44:629–634 flow nasal cannula in preterm infants. J Perinatol 2006; 26:476–480
20. De Klerk AM, De Klerk RK: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and 37. Frizzola M, Miller TL, Rodriguez ME, et al: High-flow nasal cannula:
outcomes of preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2001; 37:161–167 Impact on oxygenation and ventilation in an acute lung injury model.
21. Locke RG, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH, et al: Inadvertent administra- Pediatr Pulmonol 2011; 46:67–74
tion of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow. 38. de Klerk A: Humidified high-flow nasal cannula: Is it the new and
Pediatrics 1993; 91:135–138 improved CPAP? Adv Neonatal Care 2008; 8:98–106
22. Finer NN: Nasal cannula use in the preterm infant: Oxygen or pres- 39. Riera J, Pérez P, Cortés J, et al: Effect of high flow nasal cannula and
sure? Pediatrics 2005; 116:1216–1217 body position on end-expiratory lung volume: A cohort study using
23. Barber DC, Brown DH: Applied potential tomography. J Phys E: Sci electrical impedance tomography. Respir Care 2013; 58:589–596
Instrum 1984; 17:723–733 40. Yang F, Patterson RP: The contribution of the lungs to thoracic imped-
24. Frerichs I, Dargaville PA, Dudykevych T, et al: Electrical impedance ance measurements: A simulation study based on a high resolution
tomography: A method for monitoring regional lung aeration and tidal finite difference model. Physiol Meas 2007; 28:S153–S161
volume distribution? Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:2312–2316 41. Mayfield S, Bogossian F, O'Malley L, et al: High-flow nasal cannula
25. Dudykevych T, Hahn G, Frerichs I, et al: A concept for evaluation of oxygen therapy for infants with bronchiolitis: Pilot study. J Paediatr
clinically relevant pulmonary parameters by high performance electrical Child Health 2014 Feb 25. [Epub ahead of print]