You are on page 1of 6

US 2014028.

4037A1
(19) United States
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0284.037 A1
Mokire et al. (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 25, 2014
(54) ALUMINUM TUBE-AND-FINASSEMBLY (52) U.S. Cl.
GEOMETRY CPC ................. F28F I/025 (2013.01); F28F I/105
(2013.01)
(71) Applicant: CATERPILLAR INC. Peoria, IL (US) USPC .......................................................... 165/183
(72) Inventors: Mahesh Kumar Mokire, Dunlap, IL
(US); Neil Alan Terry, Edelstein, IL
(US); Sudhakara Reddy Gopireddy, (57) ABSTRACT
Dunlap, IL (US); Sumeeth Sivangere,
Dunlap, IL (US)
A tube-and-fin assembly comprises a generally elliptical,
(73) Assignee: Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, IL (US) cylindrical, elongated aluminum tube and a plurality of alu
minum fins. Each fin extends outward from a side of the tube
(21) Appl. No.: 13/847,867 body to an apex. The aluminum assembly has a ratio offin
1-1. height to fin density (Mokire ratio) of between about 0.3200
(22) Filed: Mar 20, 2013 and about 0.4125. The fin height is about 6.4 mm to about 6.6
Publication Classification mm and the fin density is about 16 to 20 fins per inch (FPI).
The fins may be part of a corrugated sheet affixed to either
(51) Int. Cl. side of the tube. The aluminum assembly achieves heat trans
(2006.01) fer performance similar to that of copper assemblies while
(2006.01) maintaining a similar space claim.

10

12
ru/
18

16
18 20

28

30

24
Patent Application Publication US 2014/028.4037 A1

10

12

18

28

24
Patent Application Publication Sep. 25, 2014 Sheet 2 of 2 US 2014/028.4037 A1

S. S.
r
r
S.
US 2014/028.4037 A1 Sep. 25, 2014

ALUMNUMITUBE-AND-FINASSEMBLY 0009 FIG. 4 is a partial side view of an alternative


GEOMETRY embodiment of a tube-and-fin assembly.
TECHNICAL FIELD DETAILED DESCRIPTION
0001. This disclosure relates generally to tube-and-fin 0010 While a tube-and fin assembly according to this
style heat exchangers. More particularly, this disclosure disclosure may be embodied in many forms, there is shown in
relates to a tube-and-fin style assembly for use in an alumi the drawings and will herein be described in detail one or
num grommetted tube (AGT) radiator. more embodiments of a tube-and-fin assembly, with the
understanding that this disclosure is to be considered an
BACKGROUND exemplification of the principles of the tube-and-finassembly
0002 Large heavy duty machines such as track-type trac and is not intended to limit the tube-and-fin assembly to the
illustrated embodiments.
tors, loaders, off highway trucks and excavators require large 0011. In the description that follows, the following terms
radiators for engine cooling. One common radiator design is are used:
the tube-and-fin structure, where numerous tube-and-fin 0012 Fin height (H) is the distance from the surface of
assemblies are mounted to coolant manifolds and arranged in the tube side 18 to the fin apex 32.
columns and rows. One example of a tube-and-finassembly is 0013 Fin density (D) is the number of fins 14 per unit
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,357.513 by L&M Radiator, Inc. length of the tube 12 on each side 18 of the tube 12.
(“Support for Heat Exchanger Tubes). The 513 patent dis 0.014 Fin thickness (T) is the thickness of the fin wall,
closes fins fitted to a flattened tube. Copper grommetted tube e.g., the thickness of the corrugated sheet 30 that forms
(CGT) radiators, in which copper tube-and-finassemblies are the fins 14.
secured to a coolant manifold or other radiator component, (0.015 Mokire ratio (MR) is the ratio offin height (H),
are expensive, which has led to the development of aluminum expressed in millimeters, to fin density (D), expressed in
grommetted tube (AGT) radiators. fins per inch of the tube 12 on each side 18 of the tube 12.
0003 Aluminum is less expensive than copper, but copper 0016 Turning to the drawings, there is shown in FIG. 1 a
has betterheat transfer performance. Aluminum is also lighter perspective view of a tube-and-fin assembly 10 of the kind
than copper but not as strong. To compensate for aluminum's used in a radiator for a large heavy duty machine. The assem
relative weakness and reduced heat transfer capability com bly 10 comprises a tube 12 and a plurality of fins 14.
pared to copper, an aluminum grommetted tube radiator (0017. The tube 12 comprises a generally elliptical, cylin
requires different geometry. The present disclosure is drical and elongated body 16 having flattened sides 18 con
directed toward providing an aluminum tube-and-fin assem nected by rounded ends 20 and defining an axis A. The tube 12
bly that delivers the same heat transfer performance as a may further comprise a generally cylindrical top end 22 and a
copper tube-and-fin assembly but maintains a similar space generally cylindrical bottom end 24 for attachment to coolant
claim (and thus fits within the same space) and so can be used manifolds. Each fin 14 extends outward from a side 18 of the
either as original equipment or to replace copper tube-and-fin body 16. A plastic clip 28 enclosing the fins 14 may connect
assemblies in the field. adjacent tube-and-fin assemblies 10 to each other for
improved stability.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
0018. The fins 14 may be an indivisible, unitary part of a
0004. In one aspect of the disclosure, an aluminum tube corrugated sheet 30 affixed to either side 18 of the tube 12.
and-fin assembly is provided having a geometry that delivers The corrugated sheet 30, and thus the fins 14, may be welded,
the same heat transfer performance as copper tube-and-fin brazed or otherwise affixed to the sides 18 of the tube 12.
assemblies but maintains a similar space claim. The alumi 0019. As best shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, each fin 14 extends
numfin-and-tube assembly comprises an aluminum tubehav outward from a side 18 of the tube 12 and terminates in an
ing a tube body and a plurality of aluminum fins disposed on apex 32. In copper grommetted tube (CGT) assemblies the
the body. The Mokire ratio, i.e., the ratio of fin height, tube 12 and the fins 14 are both made of copper. CGT assem
expressed in millimeters, to fin density, expressed in fins per blies typically have a fin density D of 22 fins per inch (FPI)
inch of the tube, is greater than about 0.3200. and a typical fin thickness T of about 0.1 mm. The tube
0005. In another aspect of the disclosure an aluminum thickness in CGT assemblies is also very small.
tube-and-fin assembly for a heat exchanger is provided com 0020. The present disclosure describes an aluminum tube
prising a generally cylindrical, elongated aluminum tubehav and-fin assembly for an aluminum grommetted tube (AGT)
ing a body with flat sides connected by ends and a plurality of radiator having a geometry that allows the aluminum tube
aluminum fins extending outward from one or both sides of and-fin assembly to approximate the heat transfer perfor
the tube, each fin terminating in an apex. The assembly has a mance of a coppertube-and-finassembly while maintaining a
fin density of about 16 to about 20 FPI and a fin height of Substantially similar space claim. This has been accom
about 6.4 to about 6.6 mm. plished by researching and developing an algorithm for deter
mining the fin thickness T, fin density D and fin height H that
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS allows for the aluminum tube-and-fin assembly to have
approximately the same heat transfer performance as a cop
0006 FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tube-and-finassem per tube-and-fin assembly while maintaining a substantially
bly for use in an aluminum grommetted tube radiator, similar space claim, despite the decreased heat transfer effi
0007 FIG. 2 is a partial side view of the tube-and-fin ciency of aluminum as compared to copper.
assembly of FIG. 1; 0021. The relationship between fin height (H) and finden
0008 FIG. 3 is a partial close up view of the tube-and-fin sity (D) was deemed critical to the Success of an aluminum
assembly of FIG. 2; and tube-and-fin assembly, so ratio offin height (H) to fin density
US 2014/028.4037 A1 Sep. 25, 2014

(D) (“Mokire ratio’) was developed from the data that accom also be used an after-market, drop-in, replacement for exist
plished the dual objectives of achieving approximately the ing copper tube-and-fin assemblies.
same heat transfer performance as a copper tube-and-fin 0029. It is understood that the embodiments of the disclo
assembly while maintaining a substantially similar space sure described above are only particular examples which
claim. serve to illustrate the principles of the disclosure. Modifica
0022. The following table summarizes the differences tions and alternative embodiments of the disclosure are con
between geometry in a copper tube-and-fin assembly and the templated which do not depart from the scope of the disclo
aluminum tube-and fin assembly of the present disclosure: Sure as defined by the foregoing teachings and appended
claims. It is intended that the claims cover all Such modifica
tions and alternative embodiments that fall within their scope.
Copper tube-and-fin Aluminum tube-and-fin We claim:
assembly assembly 1. An aluminum tube-and-fin assembly for a heat
Fin Thickness (T), mm O.1 O.2
exchanger, the assembly comprising:
Fin Density (D), fins 22 16-2O an aluminum tube having a body; and
per inch a plurality of aluminum fins disposed on the body;
Fin Height (H), mm 6.15 6.4 to 6.6 wherein the Mokire ratio is greater than about 0.3200.
Mokire 0.2795 O.32OO to 0.4125
Ratio (MR) (HD) 2. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 1
wherein:
the Mokire ratio is about 0.3200 to about 0.4125.
0023 For a typical copper tube-and-fin assembly, fin 3. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 1
thickness T is about 0.1 mm, fin density D is about 22 FPI and wherein:
fin height H is about 6.15 mm. the fin height is about 6.4 mm to about 6.6 mm; and
0024. In an aluminum tube-and-fin assembly according to the fin density is about 16 FPI to about 20 FPI.
the present disclosure, the fin thickness (and tube thickness) is 4. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 1
increased over that used in a typical copper tube-and-fin wherein:
assembly because aluminum is weaker than copper and to the fin thickness is about 0.2 mm.
improve heat transfer performance. Further, to maintain 5. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 1
proper airflow around the aluminum fins, fin density is wherein:
reduced. But since reducing fin density can cause a drop in the aluminum tube is a generally cylindrical, elongated
heat transfer performance, fin height is increased to improve structure having a body with flat sides connected by
performance. ends; and
each aluminum fin extends outward from a side of the tube
0025. After research and development, a suitable fin thick and terminates in an apex.
ness T for an aluminum tube-and-fin assembly was deter 6. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 1
mined to be about 0.2 mm. The fin density D for the aluminum wherein:
tube-and-finassembly was determined to be less than or equal the fins are an indivisible unitary part of a corrugated sheet
to about 20 FPI and as low as about 16 FPI. Fin height H for affixed to either side of the tube.
the aluminum tube-and-fin assembly was determined to be 7. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 1
between about 6.4 and about 6.6 mm. The Mokire ratio (MR) wherein:
was determined to be between about 0.3200 (6.4 mm/20 FPI) the fins are substantially planar and extend outwardly from
and about 0.4125 (6.6 mm/16 FPI). The newly configured the tube.
aluminum tube-and-fin assembly was determined to come
close to matching the heat transfer performance of a copper 8. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 1
tube-and-fin assembly while maintaining a substantially wherein:
similar space claim. the fins are substantially planar and extend outwardly from
0026. For example, in one example a suitable aluminum a fin plate adjacent the tube.
tube-and-fin assembly was developed having a fin thickness 8. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 1
wherein:
(T) of 0.2 mm, a fin density (D) of 20 FPI and a fin height (H) the Mokire ratio is about 0.3275.
of 6.55 mm. The Mokire ration (MR) was 0.3275. 9. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 8
0027 FIG. 4 is a partial side cross-sectional view of an wherein:
alternative embodiment of a tube-and-fin assembly 40 in the fin thickness is about 0.2 mm.
which substantially planar fins 42 extend outwardly from a fin 10. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 9
base plate 44 adjacent the tube 46. A tube-and-fin geometry wherein:
similar to that used in the previous embodiment 10 may be the aluminum tube is a generally cylindrical, elongated
used.
structure having a body with flat sides connected by
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY ends; and
each aluminum fin extends outward from a side of the tube
0028. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly described and terminates in an apex.
herein is less expensive than traditional copper tube-and-fin 11. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 10
assemblies while maintaining similar heat transfer perfor wherein:
mance and space claim. The aluminum tube-and-finassembly the fins are an indivisible unitary part of a corrugated sheet
may be used as a component of large radiators used in heavy affixed to either side of the tube.
duty machines, especially where cost and performance are 12. An aluminum tube-and-fin assembly for a heat
design factors. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly 10 may exchanger, the assembly comprising:
US 2014/028.4037 A1 Sep. 25, 2014

a generally cylindrical, elongated aluminum tube having a


body with flat sides connected by ends; and
a plurality of aluminum fins, each fin extending outward
from a side of the tube to an apex;
wherein the assembly has a fin density of 16 to 20 FPI and
a fin height of 6.4 to 6.6 mm.
13. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 12
wherein:
the fins have a thickness of about 0.2 mm.
14. The aluminum tube-and-fin assembly of claim 12
wherein:
the fins are an indivisible unitary part of a corrugated sheet
affixed to either side of the tube.
k k k k k

You might also like