Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A. Introduction
The BLGF was established on January 30, 1987 by virtue of Section 43, Executive
Order (EO) No. 127, wherein the Department of Finance (DOF) was reorganized
and the Office of the Local Government was elevated to a Bureau. It is the DOF’s
arm principally responsible for the enhancement and supervision of Local
Government Unit (LGU) financial operations for local economic growth leading the
way towards national development.
The Bureau has an authorized total personnel complement of 425 with 217 filled up
permanent positions and 45 co-terminous incumbents that assist in the different
responsibility centers comprising of five major services with 15 ROs nationwide as
of December 31, 2016.
B. Financial Highlights
The financial position, financial performance and the sources and utilization of
funds for CY 2016, with corresponding figures for CY 2015, are summarized
below:
i
Particulars 2016 2015
Financial Performance
Revenue P231,845,805.65 P225,469,580.66
Expenses 218,334,142.18 209,063,592.68
Surplus/(Deficit) 13,511,663.47 16,405,987.98
C. Operational Highlights
For the past year, BLGF’s strategies were focused on continuing good governance
reforms through resource mobilization programs, good governance and
transparency initiatives, implementation of special projects, enhancement of
existing systems, networking and linking with international partners and capacity
development programs for BLGF and LGUs. The following are the reported
accomplishments of the BLGF:
ii
c. Special Projects
Under the European Union funded LGU PFM 2 Project, the DOF thru the
BLGF joined the DILG, DBM and NEDA in signing the Joint Memorandum
Circular No. 1-2016 setting the framework and policy for a more
coordinated approach towards improving local government units’ public
financial management in ensuring harmonized and synchronized policies,
systems and procedures in planning, budgeting, investment programming,
and resource mobilization coordination in fiscal oversight pursuant to the
mandated functions under the Local Government Code (LGC) of 1991.
The Secretary, thru the BLGF, issued Department Order No. 49-2016 dated
September 5, 2016 for the inclusion of Environment and Natural Resources
Data in the Electronic Statement of Receipts and Expenditures System for
Local Treasurers in the commitment to promote transparency and good
governance in managing the country’s natural resources.
d. Capacity Development
The BLGF in coordination with the Department of Finance (DOF) and Civil
Service Commission (CSC) submitted to the Secretary the results of the
Basic Competency of Local Treasury Examination (BCLTE) conducted in
December of 2015. The BCLTE was mandatory for all permanent and
designated treasurers and assistant treasurers including the BLGF Central
and Regional employees assigned with local treasury supervision functions.
iii
The BLGF, in cooperation with the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
conducted three Cluster Trainings for the Provincial Roll-out of LGU
Integrated Financial Tools (LIFT) to Regions II, III, V, VII, VIII and IX in
November 2016 at the Baywiew Park Hotel, Manila.
In 2016, there were a total of 342 appointments and 113 designations for
Treasurers and Assistant Treasurer issued from 16 BLGF Regions.
As part of networking with local and international partners, the Bureau has
been sharing the efforts of the government on local governance. Recently,
the impact of business tax administration at the National LGU Information
and Communication Technology (ICT) forum has been shared with other
national government agencies and offered expertise at the ARMM LGU
Forum to capacitate local treasurers on local fiscal management.
iv
D. Scope of Audit
The audit covered the financial transactions and operations of the BLGF for CY
2016 to determine the reliability of the accounting data; propriety of the financial
transactions; fairness of the presentation of financial statements; and ascertain
compliance with laws, rules and regulations. The audit was made through the
conduct of selective tests and, accordingly, included other audit techniques and
procedures deemed necessary under the circumstances.
1. In CO and RO V, the Due from NGAs account was overstated due to the
unrecorded deliveries from Procurement Service (PS) and unliquidated funds
transferred to the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) totaling
P1,910,000.00 and P15,000,000.00, respectively, thereby, understating the
Computer Software and Construction in Progress – Buildings and Other
Structures accounts by the same amounts.
2. The reported balance of the PPE accounts could not be relied upon due to the
following deficiencies: (a) the conduct of annual physical count of PPE was not
undertaken or delayed, thus reconciliation between Accounting and Property
records was not done; (b) inclusion of PPEs below the capitalization threshold
of P15,000.00 totaling P7,594,688.86; (c) properties donated to various entities
with a net book value of P572,194.85 were still not derecognized; (d) properties
received from various entities could not be recognized in the books for lack of
pertinent documents; (e) Land and Office Building recognized without proof of
ownership; (f) non-maintenance of PPE Ledger Cards (PPELC) and Property
Cards (PC); (g) inclusion of unserviceable properties in the amount of
P547,227.44; and (h) misclassified Other Machineries and Equipment and
Other PPE accounts to Communication Equipment account totaling P83,789.00.
v
We recommended that the concerned BLGF Managements to:
d. Request from the donor agencies copy of the documents transferring the
subject PPEs as basis in the recognition;
3. In ROs IV-A and VIII, the Office Supplies Inventory account amounting to
P141,923.13 and P145,571.64, respectively, could not be relied upon due to the
following deficiencies: (a) non-maintenance of Supplies Ledger Cards (SLCs)
and Stock Cards (SCs) to monitor the acquisitions and issuances of supplies; (b)
the non-preparation of the Report on Supplies and Materials Issued (RSMI) for
the issuances; and (c) the conduct of actual physical inventory was not done,
hence difficulty in the reconciliation of accounting and property records.
vi
a. Require the Accountant and the Supply Officer to prepare and fully update
the SLCs and SCs, respectively, and reconcile these with the RPCI;
b. Require the Supply Officer to prepare the RSMI to record the issuances; and
6. In CO and RO VII, properties reclassified under the Other Assets account such
as three vehicles which were already transferred to the regional offices; and
various unserviceable properties with a net book value of P111,541.92 and
P28,141.76, respectively, remained recorded in the books, thereby overstating
the Other Assets and the Accumulated Surplus accounts.
vii
F. Other Significant Observations and Recommendations
1. In CO and RO IX, the excess training fees and the dormant account amounting
to P495,251.21 and P16,030.41, respectively, remained unremitted to the
Bureau of the Treasury (BTr) contrary to Section 13 of the General Provisions
of the GAA for FY 2016 and COA Circular No. 97-001.
3. In CO and ROs III and VI, the required consolidated and year-end financial
reports, respectively, were not submitted to the Office of the Auditor within the
prescribed period pursuant to Section 60 (c), Chapter 19 of the Government
Accounting Manual (GAM), Volume I, thus causing delay in the examination
and audit of transactions and communicating the results thereof.
viii
implemented, and three were not implemented. Details are discussed in Part III of
this report.
ix