Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ari Marshall
Soenke Biermann
For far too long, humans have exploited the ocean's resources as if they were infinite,
disregarding the fact that the ocean's fish populations are being rapidly depleted faster than they
can repopulate. The expanding scope of fishing has led to the decimation of fish stocks, with the
United Nations (UN) estimating in 2015 that a staggering 85% of global fish stocks have already
been either "fully fished" or "overfished" (Carolin, 2015, p.133). This trend has accelerated since
the 1950s, when only around 60% of the world's oceans were being fished, to 2020, when over
90% of the ocean is being actively exploited (Crowell, & Turvold, 2020, p. 210). The driver
behind exploitation of the world's fish stocks is the increased global demand and consumption of
seafood. Vince et al. (2021) reported that seafood consumption has already surpassed that of
terrestrially produced meat (p. 519). In addition, Keel and Wolf (2020) noted that the cost of
seafood has nearly doubled in the past 11 years and is projected to quadruple within the next 15
years (p. 1746). As seafood demand and consumption continue to rise, and fish stocks continue
to decline, countries and private entities have economic incentive to harvest even more seafood
to out-compete competitors, all of whom are fighting for a valuable diminishing resource
inland water, coastal waters, and on the high seas. In 2016 alone, approximately 35% of the
world's fish that were harvested were exported for a sum profit of US $143 billion (Macfadyen
et. al., 2019, p. 8). The immense profits of the fishing industry and the difficulty in establishing
efficient ways to monitor it leaves enormous gaps for citizens to unlawfully fish and for
Globally, more than 3 billion people rely on fish for nutrition and an additional 40 million
people are employed by the fishing industry (Coit & Spinrad, 2021, p.9; Macfadyen et. al., 2019,
p. 8). Illegal fishing is a direct threat to the 40 million people legally employed to fish as well as
the more than 3 billion people who need fish for nutrition, and is a monumental threat to global
food security as the world’s fish stocks are on the brink of collapse (Coit & Spinrad, 2021, p.9;
Macfadyen et. al., 2019, p. 8; Desai & Shambaugh, 2021, p. 2). The issue of illegal fishing also
has significant human rights implications, as it often involves the exploitation of modern-day
slave labor and contributes to other illegal activities such as drug and weapons trafficking,
wildlife trade, and human smuggling (Poling & Cronin, 2017, p.16). Addressing illegal,
underreported, and unregulated fishing is a multifaceted issue that requires the identification of
both individuals and vessels involved in such activities, effective enforcement of marine
regulations, and heightened awareness regarding the detrimental impact of these practices
unregulated (IUU) fishing, along with the various forms it takes (p. 939). The challenges of
surveillance and recording illegal fishing make it difficult to assess the extent of IUU fishing.
However, the most frequently cited statistic on IUU fishing is from 2003, which estimated that
between 10 and 26 million tons of fish with a value ranging from US $10 billion to US $23
billion were illegally harvested (Macfadyen et al., 2019, p. 8; Telesetsky, 2014, p. 944).
Illegal fishing involves a vessel fishing in waters without the permission of the state that has the
economic rights to that body of water or in contravention of its laws and regulations (Food and
Agriculture Organization, n.d., para. 2).Illegal fishing can also occur when a vessel, registered
under a state that is part of a regional fisheries management organization, violates the
4
Agriculture Organization, n.d., para. 3). The third type of illegal fishing is when a vessel
disregards national laws or international obligations, even if the state is cooperating with a
relevant regional fisheries management organization (Food and Agriculture Organization, n.d.,
para. 4)
Under-reported fishing is another form of IUU fishing. This refers to the practice of
engaging in fishing activities but deliberately choosing not to report them or providing false
information to authorities, which is a clear violation of national laws, regulations, and reporting
Unregulated fishing is the final form of IUU fishing. It often occurs in international
a specific geographic area or to set rules for certain highly migratory species, such as tuna, in
lieu of coastal states (Poling & Cronin, 2017, p. 3). However, membership in RFMOs is
voluntary, and fishing vessels are motivated to operate beyond the jurisdiction of coastal states to
catch commercially valuable fish without complying with regulations intended to promote
sustainable harvesting practices and revenue sharing with coastal states (Poling & Cronin, 2017,
p. 3,7).
5
Although there are many proposed solutions, legal documents and strategies to end illegal
fishing, such as The United Nations 1982 Convention of the Law of the Sea, and the Agreement
on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated
marine conservation (Karcher et al., 2020, p. 5). The power of Marine Protected Areas is well
recognized and was most recently addressed this year in a historic United Nations Treaty that is
the first marine treaty to protect areas of the ocean that lie outside of national borders and has
four main objectives (Kim & Treisman, 2023, para. 13; Stallard. 2023, para. 13).These
objectives include protecting 30% of the world's ocean by 2030, requiring adequate knowledge
of negative environmental impact before any new exploitation of marine resources occurs in
technologies and benefits from marine resources, and controlling which countries and companies
are allowed to access and profit from the commercialization of "marine genetic resources."
(Parkes, 2023, para. 10-11; Kim & Treisman, 2023, para. 13,14,17) The new High Seas Treaty
will establish new Marine Protected Areas in the ocean to conserve marine life and
biodiversity.The new High Seas treaty has not yet been ratified and implemented by United
Nations members, but when it is, it will essentially establish new Marine Protected Areas in the
ocean. Marine Protected Areas are policy instruments to conserve marine life and biodiversity.
geographical place with the goal of long-term preservation of ecosystems (Wenzel et al., 2020, p.
1). MPAs exist along a spectrum of protection. Kirsten Grorud-Colvert and her colleagues (cited
in Cooney et al., 2019, p. 2) classify marine protected areas into four categories. Minimally
6
marine protected areas allow for extensive extraction or effective lack of enforcement,
implementation, and active management (Cooney, 2019, p. 2) Lightly protected MPAs, similar to
general fisheries management areas, prohibit some extractive activities but still permit
commercial fishing to some extent (Cooney, 2019, p. 2) Highly protected MPAs allow for light
extractive activities, such as subsistence and recreational fishing (Cooney, 2019, p. 3) Finally,
fully protected MPAs prohibit all extractive activity, providing the highest level of protection for
The success of a marine protected area is dependent upon factors such as governance and
socio-economic characteristics, as opposed to design attributes like the size of the marine
protected area (MPA), which play a more significant role (Giakoumi et al., 2018, p. 2). In a study
conducted by Giakoumi et al. (2019) it was determined crucial aspects for success in Marine
Protected Areas included surveillance, leadership, political will, and the existence of sanctioning
and conflict resolution mechanisms (p. 2). Unfortunately, there exists a great disparity between
economically wealthy countries that have the adequate personnel and resources to monitor and
enforce marine regulations and developing countries that often lack the latter to enforce
Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been successful in conserving marine biodiversity
and managing fisheries, regardless of their location, by actively involving individuals, groups, or
organizations that have a vested interest in or are impacted by the creation of the MPA
(Giakoumi et al., 2018, p. 1). For example, Indonesia's fisheries ministry has announced plans to
expand MPA coverage to 325,000 square kilometers, which is equivalent to 10% of the country's
territorial waters, in line with the global "30 by 30" conservation goal to protect 30% of the
world's seas and lands by 2030. (Gokkon, 2022, para. 1,6). However, Arisetiarso Soemodinoto,
7
the leader of an ocean conservation NGO called Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara has stated
that despite Indonesia’s network of existing MPAs, only 25% of them have been effective in
conserving fish stocks and biodiversity while ensuring equitable benefits for ocean-dependent
To investigate how effective MPA management can be achieved, I have chosen to focus
on Pemuteran in Indonesia. The Pemuteran Bay Coral Protection Foundation was established in
response to the collapse of the local fishing industry due to unsustainable fishing practices,
sedimentation, and rising water temperatures (United Nations Development Programme, 2013, p.
3) Over 70 artificial 'biorock' coral reefs have been established by the foundation to revive
marine biodiversity and fish stocks. The connection of these reefs has led to the rejuvenation of
local subsistence fishing livelihoods (United Nations Development Programme, 2013, p. 3) The
community has also been trained in artificial reef building and has created a de facto locally
managed MPA with community-enforced regulations that prohibit destructive fishing practices
scuba divers from around the world and providing another source of income. The revenue from
ecotourism has been channeled towards environmental education, shoreline restoration projects
to control erosion, and reinvested in local schools (United Nations Development Programme,
2013, p. 3). Thus, since my research focuses on IUU fishing, the question of my study is: How
has the community-led management of a local marine protected area in Pemuteran, Indonesia
Introduction
Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing is a multifaceted and pervasive issue
that poses a direct threat to the entire marine ecosystem, the livelihoods of coastal communities,
and food and environmental security. This literature review aims to examine the various drivers
behind illegal fishing, the far-reaching implications of such activities on food and environmental
security as well as geopolitical stability, and potential solutions to combat this issue. The main
themes explored throughout this review include seafood demand, ocean management, and other
Seafood demand
Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing (IUU) is primarily driven by the increasing
global demand for seafood, which is expected to significantly rise in the coming years (Barner et
al., 2015; Carolin, 2015; Chen et al., 2023; Crowell & Turvold, 2020; Hongzhou, 2012; Keel &
Wolf, 2020; Zhou et al., 2015). Keel and Wolf (2020) conducted a study on the major threats to
marine life and found that seafood prices have continuously increased throughout recent years
and consumption is projected to rise in the future due to the increasing global population.
Hongzhou (2012) examined the reasons behind China's involvement in IUU fishing and
concluded that the country's growing population and domestic demand for seafood, as well as the
international demand from countries like the United States, were contributing factors. In a case
study about China's distant water fishing fleet, Carolin (2015) also alluded to the domestic
demand for seafood from China's population as an explanation for why China has increasingly
Barner et al. (2015) and Crowell and Turvold (2020) both noted that billions of people
rely on fish for animal protein, particularly those living in developing countries, and that seafood
consumption is steadily increasing. Barner et al. (2015) highlighted that fisheries cannot meet
this demand as the amount of fish caught has remained constant since the 1990s. Additionally,
Vince et al. (2021) points out that wild capture fish landings have plateaued since the 1980s
despite rising demand. Zhou et al. (2015) also notes that global fish catches are declining as well
In recent years, the issue of inadequate ocean management in combating illegal fishing
has become pressing, prompting the need to examine existing strategies and propose potential
solutions to enhance their effectiveness. Karcher et al. (2020) explain that the ocean is governed
by legally binding instruments, which are well-defined and enforceable policies regarding a
specific region or fish stock, and non-binding strategies that often present statistics and suggested
actions regarding a region or fish stock (p. 5). However, IUU fishing is rampant on the high seas,
where there is no governing body or policy management, as well as in marine disputed areas
Laffoley et al. (2020) suggest that the highest priority to curbing IUU fishing should be
focusing on creating a thorough and full-scale high seas treaty which should protect 30% of the
world's oceans from various forms of human activities such as deep-sea mining and fishing (p.
2). Similarly, Sumaila and Tai (2020) strongly agree that a global management system is
necessary to protect highly migratory and valuable fish stocks, such as tuna, specifically one that
addresses the high seas as protection for the high seas is not included in the current main
document governing the seas; the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (p. 6).
10
Chen et al. (2023) argue that marine disputed areas are a top priority for solving IUU
fishing. The authors conclude that the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea provides explicit
roles for nations involved in fishing, and these roles still apply even in disputed areas. Therefore,
governments and large-scale marine conservation efforts should focus on addressing these
disputes and assigning clear boundaries to countries, allowing them to resume their proper roles
Furthermore, Hongzhou (2012) describes how marine disputed areas were initially
caused by the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea mandating areas that were once the high
seas to become economic exclusive zones, leaving China with the difficulty of meeting its
domestic demand for seafood while losing hundreds of miles of sea to fish in
Desecuritizing fisheries
Zhang and Bateman (2017) argue that illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing
in disputed marine areas has been securitized through a narrative that labels Chinese fishing
vessels as agents of the Chinese government attempting to control the area. They assert that
while securitizing fisheries raises public and political awareness of IUU fishing, it limits policy
options and cooperation among governments when viewed as a military threat. Similarly, Luo
and Chi (2023) found that coupling fisheries with national security creates barriers to sustainable
fisheries governance cooperation, hindering marine conservation efforts. To address this, both
Zhang and Bateman (2017) and Luo and Chi (2023) suggest desecuritizing fisheries
management, prioritizing a return to a simple issue of marine management that benefits all
countries. However, Carolin (2015) offers a contrasting view, showing how China's distant water
geopolitical tensions in the South China Sea. Crowell and Turvold (2020) support this sentiment,
11
validating the fishing militia narrative and confirming China's militarization of its fishing fleet to
As seafood demand continues to rise, along with IUU fishing, it is clear that ineffective
ocean management strategies, including a lack of an enforcement governing body on the high
seas and marine disputed areas, as well as the polarization of fisheries management between the
securitization of fisheries and the under-securitization of fisheries, are contributing factors to the
inefficacy of stopping IUU fishing. Thus, Poling and Cronin (2017), Laffoley et al. (2020),
Collins et al. (2021), Crowell and Turvold (2020), Desai and Shambaugh (2021), Klein et al.
(2022), and Sumaila and Tai (2020) propose the overarching solution of stronger government
regulation and policies for ocean management, specifically comprehensive and specific
management plans targeting specific species, parts of the ocean, and migratory fish stocks.
In their theoretical overview, Poling and Cronin (2017) conclude that a major step
towards curbing IUU fishing is addressing the lack of a governing body for the high seas and
implementing a stronger legal framework. Laffoley et al. (2020) also conclude that a pertinent
step to restoring ocean health is implementing a comprehensive high seas Treaty, including
marine protected areas that outlaw deep-sea mining and destructive fishing practices. Crowell
and Turvold (2020) discuss how developing and strictly enforcing a global migratory fish policy
and ensuring nations are well-informed in marine policy are priorities in curbing IUU fishing.
Desai and Shambaugh (2021) conclude that a strong central government that can effectively
control its own economic exclusive zones is the best deterrent to IUU fishing. Klein et al. (2022)
describe how strong governments with effective enforcement are critical to eliminate IUU
fishing. Thus, creating a specific management plan to address certain countries that are
12
economically better off than the countries they are targeting to fish is a pertinent step in reducing
IUU fishing.
Sumaila and Tai (2020) mention the fact that many valuable fish stocks are highly
migratory, and regional and global marine management should be a priority to increase fish stock
numbers. Collins et al. (2021) recommend developing integrated management approaches that
A recurring theme in the literature emphasizes the importance of preventing IUU fishing
by developing strategies and identifying indicators that can detect and prevent illegal activities
before they occur. Collins et al. (2021) conducted a case study on the social, environmental, and
policy drivers that lead Sri Lankan fishermen to engage in illegal, unreported, and unregulated
(IUU) fishing in foreign economic exclusive zones. The authors concluded that given the variety
of incentives for Sri Lankan fishermen to engage in IUU fishing, there is a need for detailed and
Davis and Harasti (2020) also suggest that identifying social and environmental factors
can help predict when IUU fishing is likely to occur, which reduces the cost of law enforcement
as they can target specific conditions and locations to strictly enforce fisheries regulations. In
their study of Seal Rocks and Broughton Island, they found that the highest instances of illegal
fishing occurred during non-work days with no rain and calm wind and seas. They also found
that the location closest to a boat ramp, fishing huts, and a camping facility had more frequent
IUU fishing. Renggong et al., (2022) found similar evidence that location is a key determinant of
IUU fishing, as the majority of perpetrators in their study in the Spermonde Archipelago,
Ford and Wilcox (2022) took a different approach to predict IUU fishing. They developed
a list of key indicators, numerically expressed, using previous literature and marine experts. The
authors concluded that knowing the owner and crew of the vessel, vessel history, and vessel
validity in terms of being licensed and easily trackable were the top determinants to indicate if a
Telesetsky (2014), Renggong et al., (2022), Crowell, and Turvold (2020) have all
suggested that increasing legal punishments and enforcement resources is an effective approach
to curb illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. According to Telesetsky, stringent
punishments equivalent to those for drug and migrant trafficking are needed to deter criminals
from engaging in IUU fishing. Similarly, Renggong et al. (2022) emphasized the need for stricter
legal punishments and enhanced enforcement capacity and resources to prevent destructive
illegal fishing. Crowell and Turvold (2020) argued that IUU commercial fishing is often
associated with modern-day slavery and the drug trade and should be considered a serious
offense that warrants proportional punishment in terms of fines and jail time. However, Wilcox
and Bergseth (2021) found that societal shame and displacement from traditional fishing grounds
Stakeholder engagement
Barner et al. (2015), Chen et al. (2023), Ford and Wilcox (2022), Giakoumi et al. (2018),
Haas et al. (2021), Afflerbach (2014), and Sumaila and Tai (2020) all emphasize the critical role
of stakeholder engagement in the success of marine management initiatives. Barner et al. (2015)
note that Marine Reserves and Rights-Based Fisheries Management can be effective marine
tools, but only when designed in collaboration with fishers. Similarly, Chen et al. (2023) and
14
Ford and Wilcox (2022) conclude that collaboration among states is essential in identifying and
monitoring important fishery resources, jointly creating regulations to curb illegal fishing, and
recognizing the value of provisional arrangements that can be subject to change. Sumaila and Tai
(2020) also highlight the importance of community involvement in designing policies and
actions to end overfishing. Giakoumi et al. (2018) found that stakeholder engagement was
consistently the most important factor affecting MPA success, and its absence was most often
linked to failure.
Conclusion
The issue of illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing (IUU) has global implications
that jeopardize the marine ecosystem, the well-being of coastal communities, and food and
environmental security. This literature review explores the underlying factors behind IUU
fishing, the consequences it has on food and environmental security and geopolitical stability,
and potential solutions to address this issue. The review sheds light on the surge in demand for
seafood worldwide, which is a significant driving force behind IUU fishing. It also emphasizes
the importance of implementing legally binding ocean management measures to tackle IUU
fishing and wide stakeholder engagement to ensure effective policies. Furthermore, the review
cooperation and promote sustainable fisheries governance. It also emphasizes the need for
effective policies and partnerships among nations to combat IUU fishing and safeguard the
world's oceans. Lastly, while the literature regarding marine protected areas is plentiful, my
specific research question will address the gap in the literature by studying the specific marine
protected area in Pemeteran, Indonesia, where there has been no in-depth study of the
Methodology
For my senior thesis I will be interning at a marine organization called Biorock where I will be
conducting a qualitative case study in order to gain a deeper understanding of the complex issue
questions that cannot be adequately addressed with statistical data by exploring the various
manifestations of the issue and its contextual factors (Busetto et al., 2020, p. 1). In addition to
qualitative research, I will utilize a case study approach which is a research methodology that
focuses on in-depth exploration of a specific manifestation of a complex issue within its real-life
To further enhance the depth of my research, I also plan to conduct participatory action
research which is a theoretical approach that emphasizes active involvement of the individuals
being researched (Baum et al., 2006, p. 854). As applied to my research, this means involving
and collaborating with local stakeholders, such as fishermen and members of Biorock. This
approach will allow for the co-creation and sharing of knowledge and the integration of diverse
perspectives and experiences into the research findings. By working collaboratively with the
economic factors that influence illegal fishing, and the effectiveness of the marine protected area
reported in a United Nations case study titled "Pemuteran Bay Coral Protection Foundation"
16
(2013), my research will address the gap in the literature regarding the particular interventions
and policies created to curb illegal fishing in the region (p.8) Specifically, I will explore the
processes of the establishment and management of the locally controlled marine protected area
that promotes marine conservation and ecotourism. To achieve this, I will utilize a qualitative
Indonesia. A qualitative study is particularly suitable for this research because it allows for a
transdisciplinary exploration of the complex social, cultural, and economic factors that contribute
to illegal fishing and how these factors intersect to create the problem (Busetto et. al., 2020, p.
1).
To further inform and structure my research on illegal fishing, I will apply the
socioecological framework, which examines the intersection of various factors that influence
health-related behavioral change. The framework identifies five levels of influence on health:
individual factors, social relationships, institutions and workplaces, physical surroundings and
community characteristics, and laws and regulations (Scarneo et. al., 2019, p. 356). I will use this
framework to understand the various factors that influence illegal fishing, including individual
attitudes towards fishing, social norms, interventions and enforcement measures, the marine
For my research, I will be utilizing various methods to collect data, but my primary
approach will be participant observation due to my active involvement in supporting the coral
and McCarty (2017), participant observation is a research method that involves acquiring
136). Therefore, throughout my internship and related experiences for my research, I will
17
maintain a field research journal, documenting observations of sights, sounds, smells, and other
that aims to explore the thoughts, opinions, beliefs, experiences, and motivations of individuals
thoughts, and perspectives on the locally managed marine protected area and their views on its
effectiveness and ease of management. During a previous visit to Biorock, I and my fellow
classmates listened to Biorock presenter Pak Made and learned that after the creation of the
marine protected area, fishermen were trained and employed in the marine eco-tourism sector.
Therefore, it would be excellent to secure semi-structured interviews with local fishermen who
have knowledge or experience related to illegal fishing in Pemuteran, Indonesia, as they can
provide valuable insights into the social, economic, and cultural factors that contribute to illegal
To complement the active engagement data collection methods I’ll be employing, I also
plan to conduct frequent archival research which could come in the form of governmental
reports, academic studies, news articles, census data, and any other materials that pertain to the
culture and socio-economic status of Pemuteran locals and could give statistical data about
illegal fishing or records of the types of illegal fishing that was prominent in the area (Das et. al.,
2018, p. 139). Unfortunately, I do not speak the local language in Bali and may not be able to
read reports but it’s possible that the websites I utilize might have a built in translation
component.
18
Finally, the creation of a marine protected area can have significant impacts on the local
community, as it involves restricting human activity and may positively or negatively affect
various groups of people who utilize that ocean in some way. To explore these impacts, I plan to
conduct surveys that will ask specific close-ended questions, such as whether participants find
value in the marine protected area and whether they think it is beneficial for the community.
While the answers to the survey questions will not provide a comprehensive picture,
Darian-Smith and McCarty (2017) suggest that surveys can provide important background
knowledge about the local community, potentially leading to new opportunities for interviews or
Ethics
is conducted ethically and in accordance with the principles outlined in the 1979 Belmont
Report, which provides ethical considerations regarding research with human participants
(Robinson, 2018, para. 4). The Belmont Report includes three important principles: respect for
persons, beneficence, and justice (Robinson, 2018, para. 4). In the following paragraphs section,
I will explain how my research will adhere to these principles of respect for persons,
Respect for persons refers to recognizing the autonomy of individuals and protecting
those with diminished autonomy (Robinson, 2018, para. 9). In my research, I will fully explain
all potential risks and benefits to research participants before they consent to participating in the
research. I will obtain informed consent using an English document written at an 8th-grade
reading level, as it is a suitable benchmark for subjects who do not speak English (Chadwick &
Morris, 2018, para. 10). In addition to obtaining informed consent from research participants, I
will also secure organizational consent from Biorock for my research either through verbal
communication with its members or written permission. Since my internship will facilitate my
research, it is important to inform Biorock and ensure they approve of my research activities.
A potential risk I have already identified and have the steps to mitigate is the danger of
using public Wi-Fi networks that are susceptible to storing and selling personal data to vendors.
To mitigate this risk, I have installed and will be using NordVPN, a top-rated security VPN app,
primary protection I have touch ID passcode protection on my computer and will lock all
confidential documents with an additional encryption passcode, either on Google Docs or the app
Additionally, due to the language barrier a possible risk of my research is that I do not
fully comprehend interviewees answers or written survey answers. This could lead to
will be informed that their participation is voluntary, and they can withdraw from the interview at
any time or revoke their survey answers. Additionally, they will be able to review all quotes or
ideas they presented in the research before anything is finalized or read by anyone else but me as
the researcher.
The principle of beneficence from the Belmont report states that research should do no
harm to participants and maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms to research
participants (Robinson, 2018, para. 28). The principle of beneficence will be applied to my
qualitative case study through my methodology of participatory action research. By utilizing the
participatory action research approach which emphasizes the active involvement of those being
researched in the research process, I will ensure that the voices of local stakeholders are heard
and that they have an equal say in the research process, including equal voices from competing
stakeholders such as marine conservationists and fishermen (Baum et al., 2006, p. 854).
This approach will allow for the creation and sharing of knowledge and the integration of
local perspectives and experiences into the research findings, which will maximize the benefits
of the research to the community. Through collaboration with the local community, I can make
sure that the research is relevant and useful to the people who are most affected by the issues of
21
harmful procedures
Justice refers to the equitable distribution of research benefits and burdens (Robinson,
2018, para. 42). Throughout the process of my qualitative case study and at the close of my
project I will also ensure that the benefits of the research are shared equally among all
stakeholders included in my research (Robinson, 2018, para. 42). Although my research may not
be published, I can give back to the community through presentations, workshops, and or other
means that the community finds beneficial which I will learn once I am on the ground in Bali,
Indonesia.
existing biases and how they could potentially impact my research. Firstly, I am a non-native
speaker of Bahasa, the local language spoken in Bali, which could create barriers to building
trust in the local community. Some people may fear that I will misrepresent their ideas or
perspectives as an outsider. Although I have mentioned above how informed consent would
mitigate this risk for participants, the lack of previously established trust with the community
traditionally and currently a male-dominated field, I may unfortunately face challenges in being
taken seriously. Lastly, I have a background in marine conservation and have never had to fish
out of necessity for food or economic income, which means I have an inherent underlying bias
towards marine conservation over fishing rights. Throughout my research, I will have to remain
keenly aware of these potential biases and ensure that my research is minimally affected.
22
Bibliography
Afflerbach, J. C., Lester, S. E., Dougherty, D. T., & Poon, S. E. (2014). A global survey of
“TURF-reserves”, Territorial Use Rights for Fisheries coupled with marine reserves.
Barner, A. K., Lubchenco, J., Costello, C., Gaines, S. D., Leland, A., Jenks, B., Murawski, S.,
Schwaab, E., & Spring, M. (2015). Solutions for Recovering and Sustaining the Bounty
Baum, F., MacDougall, C., Smith, D. (2006). Participatory action research. Journal of
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662
Carolin, C. (2015). The Dragon as a Fisherman: China’s Distant Water Fishing Fleet and the
133–144. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27000982
Chadwick, G. L., & Morris, L. (2018) Consent with Subjects Who Do Not Speak English-SBE.
Chen, X., Xu, Q., & Li, L. (2023). Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing Governance in
Coit, J., & Spinrad, R. W. (2021). Improving International Fisheries Management. NOAA
Collins, C., Nuno, A., Benaragama, A., Broderick, A., Wijesundara, I., Wijetunge, D., &
Social‐ecological drivers of fleet behavior and evidence of illegal fishing. People &
Cooney, M., Goldstein, M., & Shapiro, E. (2019, June 3). How marine protected areas help
https://www.americanprogress.org/article/marine-protected-areas-help-fisheries-ocean-ec
osystems/
Crowell, B., & Turvold, W. (2020). Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing And The
Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific (pp. 209–216). Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific
Darian-Smith, E. & McCarty, P. C. (2017c). Global Methods and Methodologies. In The global
turn: Theories, research designs, and methods for global studies (pp. 129-177).
Das, R. Jain, K.K. & Mishra, S.K. (2016). Archival research: A neglected method in organization
10.1108/BIJ-08-2016-0123.
24
Desai, R. M., & Shambaugh, G. E. (2021). Measuring the global impact of destructive and illegal
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246835
Food and Agriculture Organization. (n.d.). What is IUU fishing? Retrieved from
https://www.fao.org/iuu-fishing/background/what-is-iuu-fishing/en/
Ford, J. H., & Wilcox, C. (2022). Quantifying risk assessments for monitoring control and
Giakoumi, S., McGowan, J., Mills, M., Beger, M., Bustamante, R. H., Charles, A., Christie, P.,
Fox, M., Garcia-Borboroglu, P., Gelcich, S., Guidetti, P., Mackelworth, P., Maina, J. M.,
McCook, L., Micheli, F., Morgan, L. E., Mumby, P. J., Reyes, L. M., White, A.,
https:// 10.3389/fmars.2018.00223
Gokkon, B. (2022, August 26). Indonesia announces plan to protect 10% of its seas by 2030, and
https://news.mongabay.com/2022/08/indonesia-announces-plan-to-protect-10-of-its-seas-
by-2030-and-30-by-2045/
Haas, B., Haward, M., McGee, J., & Fleming, A. (2021). Explicit targets and cooperation:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09491-7
25
Hongzhou, Z. (2012). China’s Evolving Fishing Industry: Implications for Regional and Global
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep17188
Karcher, D. B., Fache, E., Breckwoldt, A., Govan, H., Elías Ilosvay, X. E., Kam King, J. K.,
Riera, L., & Sabinot, C. (2020). Trends in South Pacific fisheries management. Marine
Keel, A. L., & Wolf, M. (2020). Towards a classification of marine wildlife crime: Marketing
strategies to curtail illegal fishing, malicious acts, and waterway pollution. Psychology &
Kim, J., & Treisman, R. (2023, March 7). What to know about the new U.N. high seas treaty —
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/07/1161196476/un-high-seas-treaty-international-waters
Klein, C. J., Kuempel, C. D., Watson, R. A., Teneva, L., Coll, M., & Mora, C. (2022, October
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac97abRenggong
Laffoley, Dan & Baxter, John & Day, Jon & Wenzel, Lauren & Bueno, Paula & Zischka, Kathy.
Luo, G., & Chi, Z. (2023). Conflicts and Challenges of Sustainable Fisheries Governance
Cooperation under the Securitization of the Maritime Commons. Fishes (MDPI AG),
8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8010001
26
Macfadyen, G., Hosch, G., Kaysser, N. and Tagziria, L., 2019. The IUU Fishing Index, 2019.
Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management limited and the Global Initiative Against
https://globalinitiative.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/IUU-Fishing-Index-Report-web-v
ersion.pdf
Parkes, G. (2023, March 10). Why the high seas treaty is a breakthrough for the ocean and the
https://climatechampions.unfccc.int/why-the-high-seas-treaty-is-a-breakthrough-for-the-o
cean-and-the-planet/
Poling, G. B., & Cronin, C. (2017). Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing as a National
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep23297
Renggong, R., Hamid, A. H., & Yulia, Y. (2022). Investigating law enforcement for coral reef
https://www.citiprogram.org.
Scarneo, S. E., Kerr, Z. Y., Kroshus, E., Register-Mihalik, J. K., Hosokawa, Y., Stearns, R. L.,
Sumaila, U., & Tai, T. (2020, March 15). End overfishing and increase the resilience of the
Telesetsky, A. (2014). Laundering Fish in the Global Undercurrents: Illegal, Unreported, and
Unregulated Fishing and Transnational Organized Crime. Ecology Law Quarterly, 41(4),
939–997. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44320331
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/insight/understanding-illegal-unreported-and-unregulate
d-fishing
United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Pemuteran Bay Coral Protection Foundation,
https://www.globalcoral.org/_oldgcra/karang_lestari_equator_award.pdf
Vince, J., Hardesty, B. D., & Wilcox, C. (2021). Progress and challenges in eliminating illegal
Wilcox, C., & Bergseth, B. J. (2021). Effectiveness of interventions to shift drivers of roving
banditry and reduce illegal fishing by Vietnamese blue boats. Conservation Letters,
Yarr, K. (2021, December 21). Fisheries and oceans Canada worries tuna quota set too high.
CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-tuna-quota-1.5850005
28
Zhang, H., & Bateman, S. (2017). Fishing Militia, the Securitization of Fishery and the South
http://www.jstor.org/stable/44683771
Zhou, S., Smith, A. D., & Knudsen, E. E. (2015). Ending overfishing while catching more fish.
100684589
Student ID
Enrolment
(to verify enrolment, please attach screenshot of your enrolled classes in MyLIU)
Biorock internshi
TOTAL CREDITS 15
31
Proof of enrollment
32
How do you best keep your if stopped by police and asked for money.
belongings safe from theft in Be aware of scams for local vendors
your IRIS location? pressuring you to buy something. Carry a
backpack or side bag securely (hand on
bag, in front) so motorcyclists can’t
swipe it. Lock all belongings.
Earthquakes and floods. Drop, cover, and https://www.remoteyear
NATURAL DISASTERS hold for earthquakes and find study .com/blog/is-bali-safe-ev
structures. For floods, get to higher erything-you-need-to-kn
Are there any natural disasters
ground and listen to authorities. Bali is ow-by-remote-year#
that are particularly common in quite mountainous and just being aware
your IRIS location? If so, how of predicted emergencies and knowing https://www.escape.com
can you best prepare for such the nearest escape paths/ safe places. .au/destinations/asia/ba
events? For up to date information in English its li/what-to-do-if-theres-a
recommended to join facebook groups n-earthquake-in-bali/ne
like Bali Expats. ws-story/8d7168a92a67
944f3167f65c8d698067
#
Quick dry and light clothes. Shorts, tank https://theworldpursuit.
CLOTHING tops, also tee shirts to cover the com/what-to-wear-in-ba
shoulders for temples and when sun li/#:~:text=Bali%20is%
What kinds of clothes are
exposure is strong. A sarong for visiting 20a%20super%20casual
recommended to keep you temples or ceremonies. Tennis shoes for ,light%20jacket%20and
comfortable in the climate you walking on the concrete and close toed %20long%20pants.
will be living in? What kinds of shoes for professionalism for visiting an
clothes are recommended in institution. Cover up near and when in
general in order to respect temples.
cultural norms of the country
you are visiting?
35