The question of the avant-garde today was largely ignored until its recent revival. When philosophy asks its questions, one naturally assumes that the obvious answers will be unacceptable. The philosophical question thus contains, beneath its shell of social disinterest, a provocative core. It addresses a situation of normative helplessness, the need for differentiation and decision.
The question of the avant-garde today was largely ignored until its recent revival. When philosophy asks its questions, one naturally assumes that the obvious answers will be unacceptable. The philosophical question thus contains, beneath its shell of social disinterest, a provocative core. It addresses a situation of normative helplessness, the need for differentiation and decision.
The question of the avant-garde today was largely ignored until its recent revival. When philosophy asks its questions, one naturally assumes that the obvious answers will be unacceptable. The philosophical question thus contains, beneath its shell of social disinterest, a provocative core. It addresses a situation of normative helplessness, the need for differentiation and decision.