KPK Annual Report 2007 - Empowering Law Enforcement

“ KORUPSI terjadi tidak
hanya karena PEJABAT

ber-MENTAL BOBROK,
tetapi juga karena SISTEM
yang JELEK
CORRUPTION does not

happen merely, because
we have BAD PEOPLE,
but also because we have
a BAD SYSTEM
“
Visi/Vision
Mewujudkan Indonesia yang Bebas
dari Korupsi
Creating an Indonesia Free from Corruption
Misi/Mission
Penggerak Perubahan untuk
Mewujudkan Bangsa yang Anti Korupsi
To be the Driver of Change in the

Creation of an Anti-Corruption Nation
ii
Asas/Principles
Kepastian Hukum / Legal Certainty
Keterbukaan / Transparency
Akuntabilitas / Accountability
Kepentingan Umum / Public Interest
Proporsionalitas / Proporsionality
Nilai-Nilai/Values
Integritas / Integrity
Profesionalisme / Professionalism
Inovasi / Innovation
Religiusitas / Religiosity
Transparansi / Transparency
Kepemimpinan / Leadhership
Produktifitas / Productivity
iii
Mewujudkan Indonesia
sejahtera adalah cita-cita
luhur pendiri bangsa ini
Creating a prosperous
Indonesia was the noble
goal of this nation’s founders
Pimpinan KPK / Commissioners

TAUFIEQURACHMAN RUKI
AMIEN SUNARYADI
SJAHRUDDIN RASUL
TUMPAK H. PANGGABEAN
ERRY RIYANA HARDJAPAMEKAS
Pengantar Pimpinan KPK
Salam Anti Korupsi,
Mewujudkan Indonesia yang bebas dari korupsi, demikian visi yang dicanangkan oleh KPK. Namun, untuk mencapai
visi itu bukanlah pekerjaan mudah. Mustahil KPK mampu melenyapkan penyakit kronis bernama korupsi dari tanah air
ini sendirian. Peran aktif masyarakat didukung kesungguhan jajaran pemerintah di tingkat pusat maupun daerah
serta perbaikan dan pemberdayaan instansi dan aparat penegak hukum merupakan syarat mutlak untuk mewujudkan
harapan tersebut.
Karena itulah, selain melakukan upaya penindakan dan pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi, Undang-undang No.
30 Tahun 2002 juga mengamamatkan KPK untuk melakukan pemberdayaan instansi dan aparat penegak hukum.
Tugas tersebut tertuang dalam pasal 6 yang di antaranya melalui kegiatan supervisi, monitor, dan koordinasi.
Pada tahun keempat ini, KPK semakin giat melakukan upaya pemberdayaan tersebut. Koordinasi dan supervisi
tentang penanganan kasus-kasus tindak pidana korupsi dengan kejaksaan dan kepolisian semakin ditingkatkan.
Begitu pun upaya KPK dalam memperbaiki sistem birokrasi di instansi-instansi yang ada di negara ini. Rekomendasi
perbaikan sistem di bea cukai, imigrasi, dan pengelolaan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (TKI) merupakan beberapa
contohnya.
Di sisi lain, upaya pencegahan dan penindakan juga terus dilakukan KPK secara simultan dengan kecepatan yang
seimbang. Saat koruptor-koruptor terus ditangkapi, di saat yang sama usaha pembentukan mental antikorupsi
dan pembangunan semangat perlawanan terhadap korupsi di kalangan masyarakat semakin gencar dilakukan.
Pimpinan KPK menyadari bahwa upaya pemberdayaan terhadap birokrasi dan aparat penegak hukum tidak akan
menuai hasil nyata jika tidak ada kemauan dan dukungan dari birokrasi dan penegak hukum itu sendiri.
Akhir kata, kami kembali mengingatkan semua pihak bahwa perang melawan korupsi adalah proses perubahan
jangka panjang yang memerlukan keberanian, kebersamaan, langkah-langkah dan jiwa yang besar, serta ketulusan
nyaris tanpa batas.
Foreword by KPK Commissioners

Anti-corruption greetings!
To realize a corruption-free Indonesia; this is the vision that the KPK strives for. However, all involved have always
known that this would not be an easy job. It is impossible for the KPK to address the chronic illness of corruption all by
itself. The active participation of the general public, as well as the real commitment of public servants from all levels
of central and regional government, combined with the reformation and empowerment of institutions and legal
enforcement public servants are all pre-requisites to any real hope or realizing the KPK’s vision.
It is therefore important that aside from performing prevention and repression efforts in the war on corruption, the
KPK also have regard to a long burning issue: reform of bureaucratic systems. Law No. 30 of 2002 also mandates
the KPK to conduct the empowerment of State institutions and public servants who work in law enforcement. This
reflects the mandate of Law No. 30 of 2002, specifically article 6, which provides for supervision, monitoring, and
coordinating activities.
In its fourth year since it started operations, the KPK had increased the intensity of such empowerment efforts. The
coordination and supervision of corruption cases handled by the Police and the Attorney General’s Office were en-
hanced. The KPK had also enhanced its efforts to reform the bureaucratic systems of our State institutions. Specifically,
the KPK had provided recommendations for reforms for the Customs and Excise, Immigration, and the management
of Indonesian Migrant Labor (TKI) systems.
Simultaneously, the KPK has continued to perform its prevention and repression efforts at a balanced pace. As crimi-
nals guilty of corruption have continued to be detained by the KPK, we have also intensified our efforts to build a
national anti-corruption mental attitude, as well as to build a fighting spirit to fuel our war on corruption at various
strategic locations in the fabric of society.
The KPK Commissioners are aware that in order for the effort of empowering bureaucrats and legal enforcement
public servants to bear fruit, the respective institutions will need to cooperate by contributing their will and support
into the effort.
To conclude, we would like to remind the reader once again that the war on corruption is a process for fundamental
change that requires courage, togetherness, big steps taken, and for men with big hearts to lead, who must also pos-
sess near limitless integrity.
Daftar isi
Contents
i Visi dan Misi / Vision and Mission
ii Asas dan Nilai-nilai / Principles and Values
iii Pengantar Pimpinan KPK / Foreword by KPK Commissioners
iv Daftar isi / Contents
1 1. BAB 1 : Sekilas KPK / Chapter 1 : KPK in Brief

2 Tugas, Wewenang dan Kewajiban / Duties, Authorities and Obligations
2 Koordinasi / Coordination
3 Supervisi / Supervision
3 Penyelidikan, Penyidikan, Penuntutan
Preliminary investigation, investigation and Prosecution
4 Pencegahan / Prevention
4 Monitoring / Monitoring
5 Organisasi / Organization
6 Struktur Organisasi / KPK Structure
7 2. BAB 2: Kondisi dan Strategi / Chapter 2 : Conditions and Strategies

10 Tantangan dan Hambatan / Challenges and Obstracles
13 Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi/ Corruption Eradication Strategy
17 3. BAB 3 : Pembangunan Kelembagaan

Chapter 3 : Institution Building
18 Pengembangan Manajemen SDM / Human Resource Development
21 Komposisi SDM Tahun 2007/ Human Resource Composition 2007
23 Peningkatan Kapasitas SDM / Human Resource Capacity Improvement
27 Pengawasan Internal / Internal Supervision
28 Dukungan Keuangan / Financial Support
33 Infrastruktur Gedung KPK / KPK Building Infrastructure
34 Dukungan Teknologi Informasi / Information Technology Support
35 Penguatan Aspek Yuridis / Strengthening of Juridical Aspect
36 KPK Peduli / The KPK’s Social Responsibility
37 4. BAB 4 : Penindakan / Chapter 4 : Repression

38 Koordinasi dan Supervisi/ Coordination and Supervision
30 Penanganan Perkara / Case Handling
43 Tertangkap Tangan / In Flagrante Delicto Arrests (Caught Red-handed)
54 Uang Negara Diselamatkan / Recovering State Losses
vi
55 5. BAB 5 : Pencegahan / Chapter 5 : Prevention
56 Pendaftaran dan Pemeriksaan LHKPN
Recording and Evaluation of Wealth Report of Public Officials (LHKPN)
60 Penanganan Gratifikasi / Gratuities
65 Pendidikan dan Pelayanan Masyarakat / Education and Public Services
71 Penelitian dan Pengembangan/ Research and Development
77 Monitor / Monitoring
95 Pengembangan Jaringan Kerjasama / Development of Cooperative Networks
109 6. BAB 6 : Penggalangan Dukungan Masyarakat

Chapter 6 : Rallying Public Support
111 Penanganan Pengaduan Masyarakat / The Handling of Public Complaints
116 Sosialisasi Pengaduan Masyarakat / Socialization of Public Complaints
116 Dukungan Media Massa terhadap KPK / Media Support for KPK
120 7. BAB 7 : Program Kerja 2007 / Chapter 7 : 2008 Work Program

121 Program Penegakan Hukum dan HAM
Law Enforcement and Human Rights Program
121 Program Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum dan HAM
Increasing Legal and Human Right Awarness Program
122 Program Peningkatan Kualitas Profesi Hukum
Quality Improvement in Legal Profession Program
123 Program Perencanaan Hukum / Legal Planning Program
124 Program Peningkatan Sarana dan Prasarana
Facilities and Infrastructure Improvement Program
124 Program Kepermerintahan yang Baik
Good Governance Implementation Program
vii
Sekilas KPK
KPK In Brief
Sekilas KPK
KPK in Brief
“
KPK diberi amanat melakukan pemberantasan
korupsi secara profesional, intensif, dan
berkesinambungan
The KPK has been given a mandate to conduct
“
corruption eradication professionally, intensively, and
continuously
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun Law No. 30 of 2002 on the Corruption

2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Eradication Commission (KPK) provides the
Tindak Pidana Korupsi, menjadi dasar legal basis for the formation of the KPK. The
pembentukan Komisi Pemberantasan KPK has been given a mandate to conduct
Korupsi (KPK). KPK diberi amanat corruption eradication professionally,
melakukan pemberantasan korupsi intensively, and continuously in order to
secara profesional, intensif, dan create a just, prosperous and peaceful
berkesinambungan untuk mewujudkan society based on Pancasila and the
masyarakat yang adil, makmur, dan Constitution of 1945.
sejahtera berdasarkan Pancasila dan
UUD Tahun 1945.
Tugas, Wewenang, dan Kewajiban Duties, Authorities and Obligations

(Pasal 6) (Article 6)
t Koordinasi dengan instansi yang t Coordinate with institutions authorized
berwenang melakukan pemberantasan to combat acts of corruption;
tindak pidana korupsi (TPK); t Supervise institutions authorized to
t Super visi terhadap instansi combat acts of corruption;
yang berwenang melakukan t Conduct preliminary investigations,
pemberantasan TPK ; investigations and prosecutions
t Melakukan penyelidikan, penyidikan, against acts of corruption;
dan penuntutan terhadap TPK; t Conduct corruption prevention activities;
t Melakukan tindakan-tindakan and
pencegahan TPK; dan t Conduct monitoring of state governance.
t Melakukan monitor terhadap
penyelenggaraan pemerintahan
negara.
Coordination (Article 7)
Koordinasi (Pasal 7)
t Coordinate preliminary investigations,
t Koordinasi penyelidikan, penyidikan, investigations and prosecutions against
dan penuntutan TPK; corrupt acts;
t Menetapkan sistem pelaporan t Establish a reporting system for corruption
dalam kegiatan pemberantasan eradication activities;
TPK; t Request information on corruption
t Meminta informasi tentang kegiatan eradication activities from related
pemberantasan TPK kepada instansi institutions;
terkait;
2 Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Pemberdayaan Penegakan Hukum / Empowering Law Enforcement
Sekilas KPK
KPK in Brief
t Melaksanakan dengar pendapat atau pertemuan

dengan instansi yang berwenang melakukan
pemberantasan TPK; dan
t Meminta laporan instansi terkait mengenai
pencegahan TPK.
Supervisi (Pasal 8 Ayat 1)

KPK berwenang melakukan pengawasan, penelitian,
atau penelaahan terhadap instansi yang menjalankan
tugas dan wewenangnya di bidang pemberantasan
TPK, serta instansi yang melaksanakan pelayanan publik.
t Conduct discussions and meetings with institutions

Penyelidikan, Penyidikan, dan Penuntutan (Pasal
authorized to eradicate corruption; and
11 dan 12)
t Request reports from related institutions on corruption
KPK berwenang melakukan penyelidikan, penyidikan, prevention.
dan penuntutan TPK yang:
t Melibatkan aparat penegak hukum, penyelenggara Supervision (Article 8 (1))
negara (PN), dan orang lain yang ada kaitannya
The KPK is authorized to conduct supervision research,
dengan TPK yang dilakukan oleh aparat penegak
and/or analysis on institutions tasked with and authorized
hukum atau PN;
to eradicate corruption, as well as public service institutions.
t Mendapat perhatian yang meresahkan masyarakat;
dan/atau
t Menyangkut kerugian negara paling sedikit
Preliminary investigation, Investigation and
Rp1.000.000.000,00 (satu miliar rupiah).
Prosecution (Articles 11 and 12)
The KPK is authorized to conduct preliminary investigation,
Dalam melaksanakan tugas penyelidikan, penyidikan, investigation and prosecution of corrupt acts that:
dan penuntutan ini, KPK berwenang: t Involve legal officials, public officials and any other
t Melakukan penyadapan dan merekam pembicaraan; person related to a corrupt act conducted by a legal or
t Memerintahkan kepada instansi terkait untuk public official;
melarang seseorang bepergian ke luar negeri; t Has aroused public attention, and/or
t Meminta keterangan kepada bank atau lembaga t Involve state losses of at least Rp.1 billion.
keuangan lainnya tentang keadaan keuangan
tersangka atau terdakwa yang sedang diperiksa; In conducting its tasks of preliminary investigation,
t Memerintahkan kepada bank atau lembaga keuangan investigation and prosecution, the KPK is authorized to:
lainnya untuk memblokir rekening yang diduga hasil t Conduct wiretapping and recording of conversations;
dari korupsi milik tersangka, terdakwa, atau pihak t Order authorized institutions to not allow an individual
lain yang terkait; to travel outside the jurisdiction;
t Memerintahkan kepada pimpinan atau atasan t Request information from banks or other financial
tersangka untuk memberhentikan sementara institutions on the financial status of suspects or
tersangka dari jabatannya; convicted individuals being checked by the KPK;
t Meminta data kekayaan dan data perpajakan t Order banks or other financial institutions to block
tersangka atau terdakwa kepada instansi terkait; accounts suspected of holding corruption proceeds of
t Menghentikan sementara suatu transaksi keuangan, a suspect, convicted individual, or other related party;
transaksi perdagangan, dan perjanjian lainnya atau t Order the superior or employer of a suspect to
pencabutan sementara perizinan, lisensi serta konsesi temporarily suspend the suspect from his/her office;
yang dilakukan atau dimiliki oleh tersangka atau t Request data on the wealth and tax information of a
terdakwa yang diduga berdasarkan bukti awal yang suspect or a convicted individual from the relevant
cukup ada hubungannya dengan TPK yang sedang institutions;
diperiksa;
Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007 3

Sekilas KPK
KPK in Brief
t Temporarily freeze a financial transaction, trade transaction

or other agreement; or temporarily revoke a permit,
license or concession conducted by or held by the
suspect or convicted individual which is suspected to
be, based on sufficient preliminary evidence, connected
to a corrupt act that is being processed;
t Request the assistance of Interpol Indonesia or a law
enforcement agency of a foreign country to conduct
searches, arrests, and the confiscation of evidence in
foreign jurisdictions;
t Request the assistance of the Police or other related
agencies to perform arrests, detainments, searches,
t Meminta bantuan Interpol Indonesia atau instansi and confiscations in the course of processing a corrupt
penegak hukum negara lain untuk melakukan act.
pencarian, penangkapan, dan penyitaan barang
bukti di luar negeri; Prevention (Article 13)
t Meminta bantuan kepolisian atau instansi lain The KPK’s authorities in the course of preventing corrupt
yang terkait untuk melakukan penangkapan, acts:
penahanan, penggeledahan, dan penyitaan t Record and cross-check the Wealth Reports of State
dalam perkara TPK yang sedang ditangani. Officials (LHKPN);
t Receive reports on, and determine the status of
Pencegahan (Pasal 13) gratifications;
Wewenang KPK dalam langkah atau upaya t Establish anti-corruption education programs at every
pencegahan TPK: tier of education;
t Melakukan pendaftaran dan pemeriksaan terhadap t Design and implement corruption eradication
laporan harta kekayaan PN (LHKPN); socialization programs;
t Menerima laporan dan menetapkan status t Conduct anti-corruption campaigns among the
gratifikasi; general public;
t Menyelenggarakan program pendidikan antikorupsi t Engage in bilateral or multilateral cooperation in
pada setiap jenjang pendidikan; eradicating corruption.
t Merancang dan mendorong terlaksananya
program sosialisasi pemberantasan TPK; Monitoring (Article 14)
t Melakukan kampanye antikorupsi kepada
masyarakat umum; In the effort to enhance efficiency and effectiveness in
t Melakukan kerja sama bilateral atau multilateral preventing corruption in State and Government agencies,
dalam pemberantasan TPK. the KPK has been given a legal mandate to conduct
monitoring duties based on the following authorities:
Monitor (Pasal 14) t Conduct analyses on the administrative management
systems of all State and Government institutions;
Dalam upaya peningkatan efisiensi dan efektivitas
t Provide guidance and suggestions to the Head of State
serta mencegah terjadinya TPK di lembaga negara
and to Government institutions with a view to
dan pemerintahan, KPK diberi amanat oleh undang-
instigating change if, based on the KPK’s analysis, the
undang untuk melaksanakan tugas monitor, dengan
administrative management system of that institution
kewenangan:
is vulnerable to corruption;
t Melakukan pengkajian terhadap sistem pengelolaan
t Report to the President, the Parliament, and the State
administrasi di semua lembaga negara dan
Audit Board if the KPK’s guidance and suggestions have
pemerintah;
been ignored.

Sekilas KPK
KPK in Brief
t Memberikan saran kepada pimpinan lembaga Organization (Article 21)

negara dan pemerintah untuk melakukan
The KPK Organization is constituted as follows:
perubahan jika berdasarkan hasil pengkajian,
t #PBSEPG$PNNJTTJPOFST composed of one Chairman
sistem pengelolaan administrasi tersebut
and 4 (four) Vice-Chairmen;
berpotensi korupsi;
t "EWJTPSZ5FBN composed of 4 (four) advisors;
t Melaporkan kepada Presiden, Dewan Perwakilan
t 0óDFPGUIF%FQVUZGPS1SFWFOUJPO, composed of the
Rakyat, dan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, jika saran
Directorate of Recording and Examining the Wealth
KPK mengenai usulan perubahan tersebut tidak
Reports of State Officials, the Directorate of Gratuity,
diindahkan.
the Directorate of Education and Public Services, and
the Directorate of Research and Development;
Organisasi (Pasal 21)
t 0óDFPGUIF%FQVUZGPS3FQSFTTJPO, composed of the
Organisasi KPK terdiri atas: Directorate of Preliminary investigations, the Directorate
t Pimpinan yang terdiri dari seorang Ketua of Investigations, and the Directorate of Prosecutions.
merangkap Anggota dan empat orang Wakil t 0óDF PG UIF %FQVUZ GPS *OGPSNBUJPO BOE %BUB,
Ketua merangkap Anggota; composed of the Directorate of Information and Data
t Tim Penasehat yang terdiri dari empat orang; Processing, the Directorate of Network Cultivation
t Deputi Bidang Pencegahan yang terdiri dari between Commissions and Institutions, and the
Direktorat Pendaftaran dan Pemeriksaan Laporan Directorate of Monitoring.
Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara (PP-LHKPN), t 0óDF PG UIF %FQVUZ GPS *OUFSOBM .POJUPSJOH BOE
Direktorat Gratifikasi, Direktorat Pendidikan dan Public Complaints, composed of the Directorate
Pelayanan Masyarakat, dan Direktorat Penelitian of Internal Monitoring and the Directorate of Public
dan Pengembangan; Complaints.
t Deputi Bidang Penindakan yang terdiri dari t 4FDSFUBSJBU (FOFSBM composed of the Bureau of
Direktorat Penyelidikan, Direktorat Penyidikan, Planning and Finance, the Bureau of General Affairs,
dan Direktorat Penuntutan. and the Bureau of Human Resources.
t Deputi Bidang Informasi dan Data yang terdiri
dari Direktorat Pengolahan Informasi dan Data,
Direktorat Pembinaan Jaringan Kerja Antar Komisi
dan Instansi, dan Direktorat Monitor.
t Deputi Bidang Pengawasan Internal dan
Pengaduan Masyarakat yang terdiri dari
Direktorat Pengawasan Internal, dan Direktorat
Pengaduan Masyarakat.
t Sekretariat Jenderal yang terdiri dari Biro
Perencanaan dan Keuangan, Biro Umum, dan
Biro Sumber Daya Manusia.

Sekilas KPK
KPK in Brief
Struktur Organisasi KPK

KPK Structure
Pimpinan
Board of Commissioners
Penasehat
Advisory Team
Deputi Bidang Pengawasan Internal

Deputi Bidang Pencegahan Deputi Bidang Penindakan Deputi Bidang Informasi dan Data dan Pengaduan Masyarakat Sekretariat Jenderal
Office of the Deputy for Prevention Office of the Deputy for Repression Office of the Deputy for Secretary General
Office of the Deputy for
Information and Data Internal Monitoring and Public
Complaints
Sekretariat D i
Sekretariat Deputi Sekretariat Deputi Sekretariat Deputi Sekretariat Deputi
Secretary of Deputy Secretary of Deputy Secretary of Deputy Secretary of Deputy
Biro Perencanaan dan Keuangan
Bureu of Planning and Finance
Direktorat Pendaftaran dan Direktorat Pengolahan Informasi

Pemeriksaan LHKPN Direktorat Penyelidikan Direktorat Pengawasan Internal Biro Umum
dan Data
Directorate of Recording & Examining Directorate of Directorate of Bureu of General Affairs
Preliminary Investivigations Directorate of Internal Monitoring
the Wealth Report of State Officials Information and Data Processing
Direktorat Pembinaan Jaringan Kerja

Direktorat Gratifikasi Direktorat Penyidikan Antar Komisi & Instansi Direktorat Pengaduan Masyarakat Biro Sumber Daya Manusia
Directorate of Gratuity Directorate of Investivigations Directorate of Network Cultivations Directorate of Public Complaints Bureu of Human Resources
between Commissions and
Institutuions
Direktorat Pendidikan dan

Pelayanan Masyarakat Direktorat Penuntutan Direktorat Monitoring
Directorate of Education and Directorate of Prosecutions Directorate of Monitoring
Public Services
Direktorat Penelitian dan

Pengembangan
Directorate of Research and
Development

Kondisi dan Strategi
Conditions and Strategies
“ Pemberantasan korupsi harus disikapi sebagai

sebuah perang bukan pertempuran
Corruption eradication must be fought as a ‘war’,
“
and not a ‘battle’
“Korupsi terjadi tidak hanya karena “Corruption does not happen merely
bad people (pejabat bermental because we have bad people (officials
bobrok ), te ta p i jug a k a re n a with no integrity), but also because we
bad system (sistem pemerintahan have a bad system (an inadequate
yang jelek)” system of governance)”
The war against corruption is never The war against corruption is never ending.
ending. Ungkapan tersebut terasa This phrase is apt in describing Indonesia’s
tepat untuk menggambarkan spirit in combating corruption. Corruption
semangat bangsa Indonesia dalam eradication must be fought as a ‘war’, and
melawan korupsi. Pemberantasan not a ‘battle’, and it is by no means a mere
korupsi harus disikapi sebagai sebuah ‘fight’. The dimensions of this war are very
perang bukan pertempuran (battle), wide. The time required to fight it cannot
apalagi hanya sekadar perkelah i a n be counted in days, months, or even years;
(fight). Dimensi perang pun sangat perhaps it is best to count it in generations.
luas. Waktu yang dibutuhkan bukanlah This is because the eradication of corruption
dalam hitungan hari, bulan atau in a nation that is ranked the 6th most corrupt
tahun tetapi bisa jadi dengan ukuran in the whole world will be a very onerous
generasi. Karena menghilangk an task.
korupsi dari negeri yang tercatat
menempati urutan keenam sebagai To free a nation from the chains of
negara terkorup di dunia itu, adalah corruption that have bound it for so long
pekerjaan maha berat. is an immense task. It is impossible that
the KPK will be able to achieve this on its
Membebaskan bangsa dari kubangan own. The war against corruption requires
korupsi yang membelenggu sejak the public’s participation, and the support
lama adalah pekerjaan maha besar. of the people. If this is achieved, there will
Dan hal itu mustahil dilakukan KPK be a massive effort by the whole of the
sendiri. KPK tidak mungkin soliter Indonesian nation to rid Indonesia of the
dalam membasmi korupsi. K arena cancer of corruption. With this in mind,
itu, b utuh pe ran s e r t a pu bl ik , the KPK will ceaselessly strive to rally the
duk ungan m as y arak at . D e ng an support of the public in combating
begitu ak an timbul upaya masif corruption. Eradicating the plague of
segenap rakyat nusantara melawan corruption and permissive attitudes
kanker korupsi. Dengan pertimbangan towards corruption shall be undertaken
itu, KPK tid ak he nt i- he nt iny a continuously and relentlessly.
menggalang peran serta masyarakat
dalam pemberantasan korupsi.
Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

8 Pemberdayaan Penegakan Hukum / Empowering Law Enforcement
Penebaran wabah antikorupsi sekaligus pereduksian The public’s confidence in law enforcement efforts,
sikap permisif terhadap korupsi dilakukan secara especially in relation to corruption, was at its lowest ebb
terus-menerus dan berkesinambungan. during Suharto’s New Order regime. Now, the people’s
confidence is slowly being restored, as the New Era of
Kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap upaya penegakan Reform is consolidated.
hukum terutama dalam kaitan dengan tindak pidana
korupsi berada pada titik terendah ketika orde baru The people of Indonesia have started to care again about
berkuasa. Kepercayaan rakyat mulai kembali tumbuh, the anti-corruption effort. Among the public, Non-
mesk i seca ra ter tatih, k etik a o rde refo r m as i Governmental Organizations have been formed which
digelora k a n. focus the public’s concern on the fight against corruption.
Since the era of transparency began with the fall of
Masyarak at mulai peduli dengan gerak an Suharto’s government, hundreds or even thousands of
pemberantasan korupsi. Di sana sini muncul NGOs have been formed. The people have enthusiastically
lemba ga swadaya masyarak at yang k o ns e r n responded to the opportunity to participate directly in the
ter h a dap pem berantasan k o rupsi. Te rc at at , war against corruption.
seja k er a k eter bukaan mulai digulirkan seiring
dengan jatuhnya pemerintahan Presiden Soeharto, The formation of the Corruption Eradication Commission
ratusan bahkan mungkin ribuan LSM berdiri yang (KPK) on December 29th, 2003 further amplified the people’s
tersebar sampai ke pelosok-pelosok. Rakyat begitu desire to play an active role in anti-corruption efforts. In
antusias untuk terlibat secara langsung dalam gerakan those early days of the KPK’s operations, this Commission
pemberantasan korupsi. was like an oasis in the midst of a desert for a people thirsty
for legal certainty and equality. The public was greatly
Lahirnya Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) pada encouraged by the KPK’s establishment.
29 Desember 2003 semakin menggelorak an
masyarakat untuk aktif dalam gerakan melawan As the tenures of the first KPK Commissioners near an end,
korupsi. Di awal kelahirannya, KPK bak mata air the people’s attention and hopes in the KPK’s viability as an
di tengah padang pasir bagi pencari keadilan dan anti-corruption agency have risen sharply. One measure
sistem hukum yang tidak pandang bulu. Masyarakat of this rise in expectations has been the number
begitu antusias melihat kehadiran KPK. of complaints received by the KPK, which has exceeded
22,000 to date.
Menjelang berakhirnya masa Pimpinan KPK yang
pertama, perhatian dan harapan masyarakat yang However, as time went on, the KPK found it increasingly
ditunjukan kepada KPK juga semakin tinggi. Salah difficult to satisfy the high expectations of the public. Such
satu tolok ukurnya adalah meningkatnya jumlah was the intensity of the public’s desire to see corruption
pengaduan masyarakat yang kini sudah mencapai eradicated once and for all that the criticisms launched
angka di atas 22 ribu pengaduan. against the KPK were frequently not from the head but
from the heart. There were even calls for the KPK to be
Namun, seiring bertambahnya waktu, kinerja yang disbanded.
dihasilk an KPK tidak memadai dengan harapan
masyarakat yang begitu tinggi kepada lembaga The criticism intensified, and the KPK was accused of
pemberangus koruptor itu. Sebagian perhatian itu cherry-picking in its handling of corruption cases. Judicial
juga muncul dalam bentuk kritik tajam yang terkadang reviews of Law No. 30 of 2002 on the KPK and Law No. 31
disampaikan tidak dengan hati melainkan dengan of 1999 on Corruption Eradication were sought some by
emosi. Bahkan segelintir di antaranya menginginkan KPK suspects.
agar KPK dibubarkan.
It was clear that not all of the criticism was based on a
Kritik pun mulai berdatangan. KPK dianggap tebang desire to develop and improve the KPK’s performance. The
pilih kasus-kasus korupsi. Sederet judicial review criticism was frequently disproportionate, alleging, for
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang example, that the cost of the KPK was far too high compared
KPK dan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 to the level of asset recovery. It was apparent that much

Pemberdayaan Penegakan Hukum / Empowering Law Enforcement 9
tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi of the criticism and condemnation was based on a lack
pun muncul dan di antaranya disampaikan para of comprehensive knowledge of the KPK’s structure and
“alumni” tersangka KPK. work.
Tidak semua k r itik dilandasi tujuan untuk

membangun/ memperbaiki kinerja KPK. Muncul
kritik lain yang tidak proposional dengan
mengatakan bahwa anggaran yang digunakan
KPK tidak sepadan dengan uang negara yang
berhasil diselamatkan. Kritik dan “kecaman” itu tidak
semua dilandasi dengan pengetahuan yang lengkap
tentang sosok KPK.
Tantangan dan Hambatan

Gerak an pemberantasan korupsi semakin
bergemuruh dalam tahun 2007. Aparat penegak
hukum seperti kepolisian dan kejaksaan seperti
Challenges and Obstacles
berlomba dalam menjerat koruptor. Media massa The corruption eradication movement reached its zenith
sebagai cermin keinginan masyarakat juga terlibat in 2007. Law Enforcers, such as the Police and the Attorney
aktif dalam menggelorakan gerakan anti korupsi. General’s Office, became involved in a race to capture
Tiada hari tanpa pemberitaan tentang upaya aparat corruptors. The media, as a reflection of the public’s
penegak hukum dalam memberantas korupsi. desires, also played an active role in the strengthening
anti-corruption movement. Hardly a day passed without
Tahun 2007 tercatat koruptor-koruptor kelas kakap news of more corruption suspects being arrested by the
berhasil ditahan. Baik dari nilai kerugian negaranya law enforcement authorities.
maupun dari ketokohannya. Di antaranya, anggota
Komisi Yudisial, anggota DPR bahkan mantan The year 2007 also saw the arrests of a number of ‘big fish’
Direktur Utama BUMN dengan aset triliunan corruptors, in terms of the amount of money stolen or how
ber ha sil ditangk ap. Di sisi lain, g e rak an famous (or infamous) the perpetrator. Among these were
pember antasan korupsi juga sudah melahirkan members of the Judicial Commission and Parliament,
rasa takut para birokrat dengan munculnya and a former president director of a state- owned
keengganan menjadi pimpinan proyek pengadaan enterprise, who was found to possess assets worth
barang dan jasa pemerintah. Kondisi tersebut sempat trillions of rupiah. On the other hand, the anti-corruption
memunculkan kekhawatiran akan memperlambat movement has also given rise to a sense of fear among
geliat laju perekonomian. bureaucrats, manifested in the form of a reluctance to
become project leaders, especially in the area of government
Di sisi lain, upaya melakukan pencegahan korupsi procurement of goods and services. This situation has
yang dilakuk an KPK masih belum mendapat understandably raised concerns about its impact on the
tanggapan serius dari aparat birokrasi. Reformasi state of the Indonesian economy.
birok r a si sebagai bagian p entin g d al am
pemberantasan korupsi masih dianggap sebelah On the other hand, the KPK’s corruption prevention efforts
mata. have not received any serious response from the bureaucratic
sphere nation-wide. Bureaucracy reform is an integral part
Reformasi birokrasi khususnya perbaikan yang of corruption eradication that is not being taken seriously
berk aitan dengan pelayanan publik tidak by bureaucratic stakeholders.
mengalami kemajuan yang berar ti. Bahk an,
pada tahun 2007 ini, Indeks Persepsi Korupsi (IPK) Bureaucratic reform, especially reform in the provision
sebagai tolok ukur efektifitas pelayanan publik of public services, has not seen any worthwhile progress.

yang dikeluarkan Transparency International justru Transparency International’s 2007 Corruption Perception
turun. Jika pada tahun 2006, IPK Indonesia 2,4 Index, which serves as a benchmark for gauging the
maka pada tahun 2007 ini turun menjadi 2,3. effectiveness of public service provision, showed that
Indonesia’s previous rating of 2.4 weakened to 2.3 in
Sesuai dengan namanya, IPK bukanlah gambaran 2007.
tentang tingk at korupsi yang terjadi, tetapi
merupak an gambaran buruknya pelayanan The Corruption Perception Index does not represent the
publik. Rendahnya IPK Indonesia ini antara lain actual amount of corrupt activities being engaged in, but
disebabkan oleh tidak diterapkannya prinsip- rather reflects the severely inadequate level of public service
prinsip good governance dalam praktik tata kelola provision. The low score rating accorded to Indonesia by
pemerintahan pada umumnya dan khususnya the CPI is due to the national failure to apply the principles
dalam praktik pelayanan publik. of good governance to the practice of governance in
general, and in the public services arena in particular.
IPK ini mengindikasikan relevansi buruknya
pelayanan publik akibat korupsi yang terjadi This latest CPI indicates the low level of public services due
di lingkungan instansi pemerintah, padahal to corruption in public institutions, even though Presidential
Presiden melalui Instruksi Nomor 5 Tahun Decree No. 5 of 2004 on the Accelerated Eradication of
2004 tentang Percepatan Pemberantasan Korupsi Corruption, requires the quality of public services to be
telah mengamanatkan peningkatan kualitas improved, and has established a number of corruption-free
pelayanan publik (butir keempat) dan penetapan zones and pilot projects.
program dan wilayah bebas korupsi.
Further, this 2007 CPI shows that corruption prevention
IPK yang justru turun tersebut, menunjukkan bahwa efforts in Indonesia are not yet optimal. Presidential De-
upaya pencegahan korupsi di Indonesia masih cree No. 5 of 2004 has never been properly implemented,
belum optimal. Instruksi Presiden Nomor 5 Tahun and the benefits have not been felt by the public. Various
2004 selama ini belum dijalankan secara penuh government line units and local goverments have intro-
dan manfaatnya belum dirasakan masyarakat duced internal improvements, but these are still sporadic
banyak. Beberapa unit kerja dan Pemerintah and partial in nature. Accordingly, a progressive reform
Daerah memang telah melakukan perbaikan- movement needs to be promoted by both central and lo-
perbaikan secara internal. Namun gerakan ini cal government.
masih bersifat sporadis dan parsial, karena itu
perlu digerakk an secara progresif oleh para
penyelenggara negara baik di pusat maupun di
daerah.
Selain belum optimalnya upaya mengubah

perilaku birokrat, hambatan dan kendala yang
muncul memasuki tahun keempat KPK di
antaranya yang bisa dicatat adalah:
t Upaya amandemen Undang-Undang Nomor
31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20
Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak
Pidana Korupsi pad tahun 2006, Mahkamah
Aside from the sub-optimal success of the efforts to change
Konstitusi (MK) telah membatalkan Penjelasan
the behavior of the bureaucrats, other notable challenges
Pasal 2 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 tahun
and obstacles faced in the fourth year of the KPK’s operations
1999 yang berarti penegak hukum (termasuk
are as follows:
KPK) tidak lagi diperbolehkan menerapkan
unsur perbuatan melawan hukum secara t Efforts to amend Law No. 31 of 1999 and Law No. 20
materiil untuk membuktikan apakah seseorang of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption in 2006 led to

ber sa lah melak uk an k o rupsi. M K ju g a the Constitutional Court striking down the Commentary
memutuskan bahwa Pasal 53 UU Nomor 30 Tahun on Article 2(1) of Law No. 31 of 1999, which meant that
2002 yang mengatur tentang eksistensi peradilan law enforcement agencies (including the KPK) can no
tipikor bertentangan dengan UUD 1945. Aturan longer act upon the element of “material conduct
pasal 53 tetap mempunyai kekuatan hukum contrary to law” in order to prove culpability. The
mengikat sampai diadakan perubahan paling Constitutional Court also held that Article 53 of Law
lambat 3 (tiga) tahun terhitung sejak putusan No. 30 of 2002, which provides for the existence of the
tersebut dibuat. Lebih dari setahun sejak Anti-corruption Court, is contrary to the 1945
keputusan dikeluarkan MK, proses perubahan Constitution. The Court also held however that
penyusunan UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 maupun Article 53 would remain in effect until it was amended,
UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 masih belum juga with such amendments having to be made within
selesai dibahas. Keputusan MK terhadap uji materi three years from the date of the Court’s decision. More
pasal 53 UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 mengharuskan than a year after the decision was made, the process
perangkat undang-undang tentang of amending Law No. 31 of 1999 and Law No. 30 of
pemberantasan korupsi maupun KPK 2002 appears to have stalled. The Constitutional Court’s
diamandemen. Agar di masa depan KPK dalam decision on article 53 of Law No. 30 of 2002 means that
melaksanakan tugas dan wewenangnya bisa the anti-corruption legislation MUST be amended. This
mengakomodasi kepentingan penyelidikan, is so that in the future the KPK, in the implementation
penyidikan, dan penuntutan secara lebih luas of its duties and authorities, will be able to conduct
dan menyeluruh dan sekaligus menutup peluang proper preliminary investigations, investigations, and
munculnya permohonan uji materi. prosecutions in a wide and holistic manner, with fur-
t Masih minimnya jumlah Sumber Daya Manusia ther opportunities for constitutional challenges being
(SDM) KPK. Saat ini KPK memiliki pegawai closed off.
sebanyak 450 orang, 27 persen di antaranya
berada di Deputi Penindakan. Jumlah ini tentu
jauh dari mencukupi jika dilihat dari sisi jumlah
pengaduan masyarak at, k asus-k asus yang
ditangani dan harapan masyarakat terhadap
KPK. Sampai bulan November 2007, jumlah
pengaduan masyarakat yang masuk sekitar
22.172 pengaduan.
t Masalah sekaligus tantangan yang dihadapi
KPK sepanjang tahun 2007 juga tidak bisa
dilepask an dar i pengaruh gel o m bang
pemberantasan korupsi di negara-negara
lain. Pengesahan Konvensi Perserik atan t Currently, the KPK’s human resources are still minimal.
Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB) Menentang Korupsi The KPK currently employs 450 personnel, 27% of whom
(United Nations Convention Against Corruption, are employed in the Office of the Deputy for Repression.
2003) pada tanggal 9 Desember 2003 di Merida, These numbers are clearly inadequate in terms of the
Meksiko, sedikit banyak mempunyai dampak number of public complaints received, cases handled,
terhadap upaya pemberantasan korupsi di and the public’s expectations of the KPK. As of November
Indonesia. Sedikitnya 137 negara turut ambil 2007, the number of public complaints received by the
bagian menandatangani konvensi tersebut, KPK stood at 22,172.
termasuk Indonesia. Sebagai anggota PBB, t The challenges and obstacles faced by the KPK in 2007
Indonesia telah meratifikasi UNCAC 2003 pada cannot be separated from the influence of a wave of
tanggal 21 Maret 2006, sebulan kemudian anti-corruption efforts in other countries. The UN
lahirlah Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006 Convention Against Corruption, signed on December
tentang Pengesahan UNCAC 2003. Dengan 9th, 2003, in Merida, Mexico, has had a significant
disa hk annya undang-undang te rs e bu t , impact on the anti-corruption effort in Indonesia. At

I n donesia harus menyelarask an undang- least 137 nations took part in signing the convention,
undang tindak pidana korupsi dengan sejumlah including Indonesia. As a member of the UN, Indonesia
ketentuan yang tercantum dalam UNCAC 2003. ratified the UNCAC on March 21st, 2006, and a month
Di antaranya adalah yang tertuang dalam Pasal later, Law No. 7 of 2006 on the Ratification to UNCAC
5 sampai 14 (Bab 2) mengenai ruang lingkup was promulgated. This legislation requires Indonesia
tindakan pencegahan korupsi, disebutkan to harmonize its laws with the provisions of UNCAC as
bahwa pencegahan dan penuntutan praktik regards international cooperation against corruption.
korupsi meliputi sektor swasta dan tindakan- Articles 5 to 14 of Chapter 2 of UNCAC, on the scope
tindakan untuk mencegah kegiatan pencucian of the anti-corruption prevention, for example, provide
uang. Sesuai dengan UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2002, that the prevention and prosecution of corrupt
KPK melakukan upaya hukum (penyelidikan, conduct must extend to the private sector, and include
penyidik an, dan penuntutan) apabil a the legal and other steps that need to be taken
menya ngk ut penyelenggara negara d an to prevent money laundering. Based on its mandate
aparat penegak hukum, sedangkan koru ps i under Law No. 30 of 2002, the KPK is responsible for
di sektor swasta m asih b elum terjam ah various law enforcement activities (preliminary
KPK. Di sisi lain, kehadiran konvensi antikorupsi investigation, investigation, prosecution), only when
tersebut menandai diakuinya korupsi sebagai public officials are involved – private sector corruption
kejahatan luar biasa (extraordinary crime). is beyond the jurisdiction of the KPK. The signing of
Bahkan, dalam konferensi Asosiasi Internasional UNCAC by the state parties also marks the recognition
Otoritas Pemberantasan Korupsi (International of corruption as an extraordinary crime. At a meeting
Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities, of the International Association of Anti-Corruption
IAACA) di Beijing, 25 Oktober 2006, disepakati Authorities in Beijing on October 25th, 2006, it was
bahwa korupsi merupakan kejahatan lintas further agreed that corruption is a grave transnational
negara (transnational crime). crime.
t Kendala yang muncul dalam upaya melakukan t Obstacles that arise in the effort to reform the Indonesian
reformasi birokrasi tercatat beberapa hal antara bureaucracy are as follows: severely inadequate gover-
lain: Sistem pemerintahan dan pelayanan publik nance and public service systems, low levels of public
yang buruk, kompensasi gaji Pegawai Negeri service remuneration, public service oversight mechanisms
Sipil yang masih tergolong rendah, sistem that are not operating well and overlap with one
pengawasan pegawai tidak berjalan baik dan another, low level of leadership, and the permissive
terkesan tumpang tindih, sedikitnya pemimpin attitude of the Indonesian people to corruption.
yang bisa menjadi teladan, dan sikap permisif
masyarakat yang ditunjukkan dengan perilaku
koruptif.
Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi

KPK dalam tugas memberantas korupsi melakukan
dua cara yakni menindak (represif ) dan mencegah
(preventif ). Keduanya dilakukan secara simultan
dengan kecepatan yang seimbang. Hal itu dilandasi
prinsip bahwa berapa pun koruptor yang berhasil
dipenjara tanpa ada upaya pencegahan tindak
pidana korupsi pekerjaan itu akan sia-sia belaka.
Tunas koruptor yang baru akan tumbuh kembali.
Corruption Eradication Strategy
Cara tersebut dilakukan setelah mencermati kondisi The KPK, in the performance of its duty to eradicate
dan situasi pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. corruption, conducts repressive and preventive approaches.
Sejarah telah membuktik an bahwa upaya Both of these types of approach must be applied
pemberantasan korupsi dengan cara represif tanpa simultaneously in a balanced manner. This overall

strategy is based on the principle that the arrest of all

known corruptors by the KPK would be for naught
because without prevention, new corruptors, or undetected
corruptors will always cultivate corrupt behavior.
This two-pronged strategy was adopted after the KPK

analyzed the condition of the anti-corruption terrain in
Indonesia. History informs us that a repressive approach
unaided by a preventive one will never be effective. Various
teams, commissions, and boards tasked with corruption
eradication since the 1950s, such as the OPSTIB in 1977,
only focused on repressive activities – results were achieved
in the early days by all such groups, but their zeal was
ada preventif hasilnya tidak akan efektif. Tercatat
always quickly smothered by corruption in the ranks.
beberapa Tim, Komisi atau Badan yang bertugas
memberantas korupsi sejak tahun 1950-an, seperti
Learning from history, the KPK has placed preventive
OPSTIB (Operasi Penertiban) tahun 1977, yang
efforts on the same level of importance as repressive
hanya fokus pada penindakan tanpa menyentuh
efforts. Preventive efforts include the reform of the
upaya pencegahan. Hasilnya menyala di awal lalu
bureaucratic system in an effective, transparent, and
pelan-pelan redup tanpa bekas bahkan tim/badan
accountable manner. Again, corruption happens not
tersebut tidak steril dengan virus korupsi.
just because of ‘bad people’, it thrives because the system
itself is bad.
Belajar dari sejarah itulah, KPK meletakkan upaya
pencegahan pada posisi yang sama dengan
Law No. 30 of 2002 gives a mandate to the KPK to
penindakan. Upaya pencegahan itu salah satunya
support the reform of the bureaucratic system. Among
adalah dengan melakuk an perbaik an sistem
the KPK’s most important tasks in this regard is analyzing
birokrasi yang efektif, transparan dan akuntable.
the bureaucratic system, providing suggestions for
Karena korupsi terjadi tidak hanya karena bad
improvements, and the conducting of supervision over
people (penyelenggara negara yang bermental
bureaucratic institutions and law enforcers. The final
bobrok) tetapi juga karena adanya bad system
objective of this work is the creation of a bureaucracy and
(sistem pemerintahan yang jelek).
law enforcement institutions that are clean and effective.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 memberi
Reform and improvements to the governance system will
amanat kepada KPK untuk ikut andil dalam
be conducted in respect of both the administrative
menciptakan kondisi tersebut. Di antara tugas
system and legal system. These efforts are intended to
KPK tersebut adalah melakukan pengkajian
bring about the renewal of governance in Indonesia with
sistem birokrasi, memberi saran perbaikan dan
a view to instituting good governance. The creation of a
melakukan supervisi terhadap institusi birokrasi dan
clean, effective, and efficient bureaucracy is the goal of the
aparat penegak hukum. Tujuan akhirnya adalah
entire Indonesian people.
menciptakan birokrat dan aparat penegak hukum
yang bersih dan mumpuni.
Perbaikan/reformasi sistem pemerintahan dilakukan

kepada semua sistem yang meliputi sistem
administrasi dan sistem hukum. Upaya tersebut
antara lain adalah dalam bentuk pembaruan
tata kelola pemerintahan. Terciptanya birokrasi
yang bersih, efektif dan mumpuni merupakan
harapan semua rakyat Indonesia.

Pada tahun 2007, selain melakukan penangkapan In 2007, aside from conducting arrests of corruptors and
koruptor, supervisi terhadap aparat penegak supervizing the work of the law enforcement agencies,
hukum, KPK juga giat melakukan upaya pencegahan the KPK was also active in conducting preventive efforts,
terutama dalam kaitan dengan reformasi birokrasi. especially in relation to bureaucratic reform. Such efforts
Upaya tersebut lebih diarahk an k epada were focused on empowering the law enforcement
pemberdayaan (empowering) aparat hukum dan institutions, and other institutions related to the provision
instansi lain terutama yang berkaitan dengan of public services.
pelayanan publik (public services).
Of the various activities conducted in pursuit of public
Di antara kegiatan yang menonjol dalam upaya service empowerment, perhaps the most prominent was
melakukan pemberdayaan adalah mengkaji an analysis of the systems employed by State and
sistem di lembaga negara dan pemerintahan. Government institutions, including the placement system
Pengkajian itu meliputi sistem penempatan tenaga for Indonesian migrant workers.
kerja Indonesia. Hasilnya, KPK menemukan sebelas
(11) temuan pokok seperti maraknya praktik suap The results of this analysis were 11 (eleven) main findings
dalam pengurusan dokumen, Belum adanya standar demonstrating just how rife bribery is in the document
pelayanan yang baku serta perlindungan terhadap processing area. The lack of established standards of
TKI yang masih lemah. Hasil kajian tersebut diberikan service and the lack of protection for Indonesian migrant
kepada Departemen Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi workers left the door open wide to corruption. These
dan Badan Nasional Penempatan dan Perlindungan findings were delivered to the Department of Labour and
TKI untuk segera ditindaklanjuti. Transmigration and the National Agency for the Placement
and Protection of Migrant Labor for follow-up.
Hal lain yang menonjol adalah pengkajian sistem
administrasi impor di Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Another prominent case was the examination made by
Cukai. Hasil kajian, KPK menemukan masih adanya the KPK on the import administration system employed by
pungutan liar , importir dapat memilih pemeriksaan the Directorate General of Customs and Excise. The results
fisik yang dikehendaki serta prosedur yang membuka of this examination showed that illicit fee-collecting is still
peluang terjadinya korupsi. Kajian ini kemudian common, and importers are able to choose the physical
disampaikan oleh KPK kepada Direktorat Jenderal inspections they prefer. These, along with other questionable
Bea dan Cukai. Kajian lain yang dlakukan KPK adalah procedures, have increased the opportunities for corruption.
dalam sistem pelayanan perijinan di Badan The results of this examination were communicated by
koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM). Beberapa the KPK to the Directorate General of Customs and Excise.
temuan juga sudah disampaikan KPK kepada BKPM. Another examination conducted by the KPK was
on the licensing services provided by the Investment
Dalam kaitan dengan fungsi pemicu (trigger) KPK
Coordinating Agency (Badan Koordinasi Penanaman
melakukan kegiatan mendorong upaya lembaga
Modal – BKPM). The findings of that examination were
pemerintah atau negara untuk melaksanakan
communicated by the KPK to the BKPM.
sebuah sistem yang dinilai memberi dampak yang
besar terhadap pemberantasan korupsi. Hal-hal
In relation to the KPK’s function as a national trigger
yang menonjol dalam tahun 2007 adalah
mechanism in the fight against corruption, it works to
implementasi pelaksanaan E-Announcement dalam
encourage State and Government institutions to establish
pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah.
their own systems that could have significant impacts
on the corruption eradication effort. In this area, one
E -Annoucement yang merupakan tahap awal dari
prominent activity in 2007 was the implementation of
E -procurement adalah langkah perbaikan sistem
e-announcement in the field of public goods and services
pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. KPK telah
procurements.
memberi saran dan mendorong adanya quick-win
untuk meningkatkan transparansi dalam proses
pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah dengan
penerapan e-Announcement pada situs web
Pengadaan Nasional.
Database Nasabah Terpusat (DNT ) juga menjadi E-announcement is the first step towards e-procurement,
sorotan KPK dalam tahun 2007. Implementasi and strives to improve the Government goods and services
sistem DNT sebenarnya sudah dimulai sejak procurement systems. The KPK has provided suggestions
tahun 2006. Data tersebut sangat penting dalam and encouraged the pursuit of quick wins in improving
rangka melacak rekening tersangka korupsi. transparency in the government goods and services
Untuk mendapatkan gambaran atau best practices, procurement process through the implementation of e-
tim gabungan antara KPK dan BI melakukan studi announcement on the National Procurement website.
banding ke Korea Selatan, China, Perancis, dan Jerman.
The establishment of a Central Customer Database
Strategi lain sebagai pelaksanaan tugas dan (Database Nasabah Terpusat - DNT) was also a focus for
wewenang KPK sesuai dengan Undang-undang the KPK in 2007. The implementation of the DNT system
No. 30 Tahun 2002 adalah melakukan koordinasi actually started in 2006. The data contained in the system
dan supervisi. Dua tugas ini bertujuan untuk lebih will be integral to the effort to trace the accounts of
memberdayakan (empowering) instansi penegak corruption suspects. In order to obtain information on
hukum atau yang lain. best practices, a joint team composed of Bank Indonesia
and KPK personnel conducted comparative studies in
Kegiatan koordinasi dilaksanakan dalam bentuk South Korea, China, France and Germany.
rapat koordinasi dengan instansi Kejaksaan dan
Kepolisian untuk membahas penanganan perkara- Other strategies involved in the discharge of the KPK’s duties
perk ara TPK . Sementara k egiatan super visi and authorities in line with Law No. 30 of 2002 are the
dilaksanak an dalam bentuk penelitian dan conducting of coordination and supervision. These strategies
penelaahan, serta gelar perkara hasil penyidikan are aimed at the empowerment of law enforcement and
atau penuntutan perk ara TPK yang sedang other institutions.
dilakukan oleh Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan berdasarkan
Surat Pemberitahuan Dimulainya Penyidikan (SPDP) Coordination activities took the form of coordination
yang dilaporkan kepada KPK. meetings with the Prosecution Service and Police to
discuss the handling of corruption cases. Meanwhile,
Koordinasi dan supervisi dilakukan KPK di antaranya supervisory activities took the form of analyses and studies,
kepada Kejaksaan Tinggi maupun Polisi Daerah. Salah publication of the results of investigations and the
satu hal yang menonjol dalam upaya supervisi dan prosecution of corruption cases being handled by the
koordinasi yang dilakukan KPK adalah munculnya Police or the Attorney General’s Office based on an SPDP
hambatan baik kepolisian maupun kejaksaan (Investigation Commencement Notice) forwarded to the
terhadap turunnya surat ijin Presiden untuk KPK.
memeriksa pejabat negara. Dalam kaitan dengan
hambatan/kendala tersebut KPK membantu The KPK conducted coordination and supervisory activities
memonitor proses permintaan perijinan tersebut. in respect of Provincial Prosecution Offices and Regional
Police Forces. One prominent issue that emerged from
Berbagai upaya yang telah dilakukan dalam these supervisory and coordinating activities were the
perang melawan korupsi ini memang tidak serta- obstacles met by the Police and Prosecution Offices in
merta langsung melenyapkan korupsi di Indonesia. obtaining Presidential consent to question State officials.
Namun, melalui usaha yang terus-menerus dan In relation to these obstacles, the KPK has assisted in the
dengan dukungan dari berbagai pihak, niscaya visi monitoring of the consent process.
menciptakan Indonesia yang bebas dari korupsi
bukanlah hal yang mustahil. The various efforts expended in the war against corruption
are certainly not going to make corruption in Indonesia
disappear overnight. However, through continuous effort
and support from all sections of the community, the KPK is
optimistic that its vision of a corruption-free Indonesia will
eventually come to pass.

Pembangunan Kelembagaan
Institution Building
“
Organisasi yang profesional dan menerapkan
prinsip-prinsip tata kelola pemerintahan yang
baik
The formation of a professional organization that
“
implements good governance principles
Salah satu modal utama agar kinerja One of the main strategies for ensuring an
KPK bisa efisien dan efektif adalah efficient and effective performance on the
melalui organisasi yang profesional dan part of the KPK is through the formation of
menerapkan prinsip-prinsip tata kelola a professional organization that adheres to
pemerintahan yang baik berlandaskan the principles of good governance, based
pada budaya kerja, perilaku organisasi on a solid work ethic, modern organizational
modern, dan nilai-nilai bermartabat. behaviour, and dignified values. This has
Itulah yang menjadi sasaran jangka been the KPK’s short-term target since its
pendek KPK dalam empat tahun pertama formation four years ago, and has been
keberadaannya. Sasaran tersebut tercipta realized through a process of institution-
melalui pembangunan kelembagaan building involving structural development,
dengan cara pengembangan struktur the designing of working procedures and
organisasi, personel, penyusunan metode methodology, and the provision of
dan prosedur kerja, serta penyiapan infrastructure and facilities.
sarana dan prasarana kerja.
Untuk mendukung pembangunan In order to support the process of institu-

kelembagaan, KPK telah melakukan tion-building, the KPK has focused on
pengembangan manajemen sumber the development of human resources
daya manusia (SDM), efisiensi dan management, financial management
efektivitas pengelolaan keuangan, efficiency and effectiveness, infrastructure
peningkatan dukungan infrastuktur, support, procurement of equipment and
peralatan dan teknologi, penguatan technology, strengthening of the legislative
peraturan pendukung kegiatan, dan framework, and the implementation of
penyelenggaraan pengawasan internal. effective internal monitoring.
Pengembangan Manajemen SDM Human Resources Development

Penyempurnaan pengelolaan dan The effort to improving the management
manajemen SDM mengacu kepada of human resources was carried out under
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 63 Government Regulation No. 63 of 2005 on
Tahun 2005 tentang Sistem Manajemen the KPK Human Resources Management
Sumber Daya Manusia (MSDM) KPK. KPK System. The KPK has undertaken various
telah melakukan beberapa program programs related to the restructuring and
kerja terkait dengan pembenahan dan improving of human resources management
penyempurnaan MSDM berbasis based on competency and performance in
kompetensi dan kinerja sesuai dengan line with organizational development:
perkembangan organisasi, yakni:

1. Rekruitmen dan Seleksi Pegawai dalam rangka 1. Recruitment and Selection of Personnel in the context
pemenuhan kebutuhan terhadap operasional kerja of fulfilling the operational needs of the KPK, in accordance
sejalan dengan perkembangan organisasi, melalui: with organizational growth, through:
t Program Indonesia Memanggil II sebanyak 106 t Second Indonesia Calls Program, which recruited
pegawai, yakni 54 pegawai Fungsional dan 106 personnel: 54 functional and administrative
pegawai Administrasi, dan 52 Calon Pegawai personnel, and 52 candidate functional personnel;
Fungsional; t 26 personnel were recruited from other Government
t Instansi Pemerintah sebanyak 26 pegawai, yak- Institutions: 5 individuals from the Attorney Gener-
ni 5 orang dari Kejaksaan Agung, 6 orang dari al’s Office, 6 individuals from the Police, 11 individu-
Kepolisian RI, 11 orang dari BPKP, dan 4 orang als from the BPKP (Finance and Development Audit
dari ANRI; Board), and 4 individuals from ANRI (National
t Pegawai Tidak Tetap sebanyak 1 orang. Archives);
t Temporary personnel: 1 individual.
2. Re-evaluasi Jabatan, yaitu melakukan pembobotan
ulang atas jabatan yang ada dengan menggunakan 2. Job re-evaluation, that is, the re-weighting of jobs
sistem Hay Point melalui faktor Pengetahuan using the Hay Point system, which uses the following
(Know-How), Pemecahan Masalah (Problem factors: Know-How, Problem Solving, Accountability,
Solving), Hasil Kerja (Accountability), dan Risiko Kerja and Working Conditions. This was necessary given the
(Working Condition), terkait dengan perkembangan KPK’s growth as an organization and the resulting
organisasi KPK dan perubahan fungsi pada beberapa changes in the functions of various jobs. This process
jabatan sesuai dengan bisnis prosesnya. Proses ini produced business process documents for each line
menghasilkan dokumen proses bisnis tiap-tiap unit, descriptions of each job, and the re-weighting
unit kerja, uraian jabatan setiap jenis pekerjaan, of each job according to its categorization: Senior
dan pembobotan tiap-tiap jabatan sesuai dengan Level, Middle Level, or Junior Level. Based on the job
pengelompokan tingkat rumpun jabatannya, yaitu re-evaluation analysis, 125 jobs in 7 work groupings
Tingkat Utama, Tingkat Madya, dan Tingkat Muda. were established. The 7 work groupings are: Struc-
Dari hasil analisis terhadap Re-evaluasi Jabatan, tural, Functional, Repression, Functional – Preventive,
ditetapkan 125 nama posisi jabatan dalam 7 rumpun Functional – Education and Public Services, Functional
jabatan (RJ), yaitu RJ Struktural, RJ Fungsional Represi, – General, Technical, and Administration.
RJ Fungsional Preventif, RJ Fungsional Pendidikan
3. Improving data competency, including both hard
dan Pelayanan Masyarakat, RJ Fungsional Umum, RJ
(technical) competencies and soft (behavioural)
Teknis, dan RJ Administrasi Umum.
competencies. Hard competencies are differentiated
3. Penyempurnaan data kompetensi, baik kompetensi according to the work groupings listed above, so as
teknis (hard competencies) maupun kompetensi to produce the technical competency data that is
perilaku (soft competencies). Kompetensi teknis a pre-requisite for each work group, This covers such
(hard competencies), dibedakan sesuai dengan areas as knowledge, skills, and aptitude – all of which
tiap-tiap rumpun jabatannya, sehingga diperoleh are assessed in performance evaluations, as well as the
data kompetensi teknis yang dipersyaratkan education and training program designs for each job,
untuk masing-masing rumpun jabatan terkait unsur or for individual staff members.
pengetahuan (knowledge), keterampilan (skills), dan
kemampuan yang dipersyaratkan (aptitude) yang For soft competencies, a Behavioral Competence
akan dipergunakan dalam proses penilaian kinerja Manual has been produced, which contains all
serta penyusunan program pendidikan dan pelatihan the dimensions and ‘proficiency levelling’ indicators
per jabatan maupun per Pegawai. for each work group. There are 24 types of behavioral
competencies in the KPK, which are categorized as
Kompetensi perilaku (soft competencies), telah follows: (a) core competencies, which all KPK personnel
ditetapkan Kamus Kompetensi Perilaku, lengkap must satisfy at the lowest permissible competency level,
dengan dimensi dan tingkat indikator perilaku (pro- including competency in the following areas: integrity,
ficiency levelling) untuk tiap-tiap rumpun jaba- needs achievement, organizational commitment, self
tan. Ada 24 jenis kompetensi perilaku di KPK, yang control, and persistence; (b) primary competencies,

dibagi menjadi tiga kategori kompetensi, yaitu:

(a) kompetensi inti (core competencies) yaitu
kompetensi perilaku yang wajib dimiliki seluruh
Pegawai KPK dengan batas tingkat kompetensi
terendah sesuai dengan persyaratan yang telah
ditetapkan oleh KPK, meliputi kompetensi integrity,
need achievement, commitment organization, self
control, dan persistent; (b) kompetensi primer
(primary competencies), yaitu kompetensi yang
harus dimiliki oleh setiap Pegawai KPK, dengan
batas tingkat kompetensi terendah sesuai dengan
persyaratan rumpun jabatannya, meliputi
communication, initiative information seeking,
teamwork, planning and organizing, self confidence;
dan (c) kompetensi sekunder (secondary which must be possessed by all KPK personnel at the
competencies), yaitu kompetensi perilaku yang lowest permissible competency level for their working
perlu dimiliki oleh pegawai pada pekerjaan group, including competency in communication,
tertentu dengan batas tingkat kompetensi proactive information seeking, teamwork, planning
terendah disesuaikan dengan persyaratan and organizing, self confidence; and (c) secondary
pekerjaan tersebut, terdiri dari analytical thinking, competencies, which personnel performing certain
building partnership, conceptual thinking, concern tasks must satisfy at the lowest permissible competency
for order and quality, service orientation, decision level, including competency in analytical thinking,
making dan delegation, developing others, directive, partnership building, conceptual thinking, concern for
impact and influence, interpersonal understanding, order and quality, service orientation, decision-making
team leadership, strategic orientation. and delegation, developing others, directive, impact
and influence, interpersonal understanding, team
4. Desain sistem penggajian baru sebagai
leadership, and strategic orientation.
penyempurnaan sistem penggajian tahun
2006 mengacu kepada hasil re-evaluasi jabatan di 4. The new salary system design, which improves on the
tahun 2007 untuk bisa segera diimplementasikan 2006 salary system, takes the 2007 job re-evaluation
pada tahun 2008. Proses penyempurnaan sistem into account, so that it can be implemented immediately
penggajian meliputi 3 (tiga) hal yaitu in 2008. The new salary system takes into account three
memperhatik an tingkat jabatan suatu posisi issues: ‘Pay for Position’; ‘Pay for Person’; and ‘Pay for
pekerjaan (Pay For Position), memperhatikan Performance’ through the provision of incentives, salary
kompetensi pegawai sebagai pemegang jabatan adjustments based on a merit system, and personnel
(Pay For Person), serta memperhatikan hasil kinerja development through promotions and transfers.
pegawai sesuai dengan pencapaian target 5. Improving Personnel Performance Management
kinerjanya (Pay For Performance) melalui pemberian through the application of a Performance Management
insentif, penyesuaian gaji dengan sistem merit System based on self-assessment, assessment by
serta pengembangan pegawai melalui program immediate superiors, and assessment by the superior
promosi atau rotasi jabatan. of the immediate superior. Components to be assessed
5. Penyempurnaan Manajemen Kinerja Pegawai are: behavioral competency and the achievement
melalui aplikasi PMS (Performance Management of the performance targets that have been adopted
Systems) dengan metode penilaian pribadi (self based upon ‘Key Results Areas’, ‘Objectives’, and ‘Key
assesment), penilaian atasan langsung, serta Performance Indicators’. The results will be used in
penilaian atasan dari atasan langsung. Komponen making decisions on incentives and personnel
yang dinilai adalah kompetensi perilaku dan development programs.
pencapaian target kinerja yang telah disusun
berdasarkan Key Result Area, Objective, dan Key

Performance Indicator-nya. Hasil dari PMS 6. The preparing of a Knowledge Management design
ini digunakan sebagai salah satu pengambilan as one of the KPK’s human resources development
keputusan kepegawaian menyangkut insentif dan approaches. This involves a process of synergizing all
program pengembangan Pegawai. of the knowledge potential within the KPK organization.
It is hoped that through the KM program, personnel
6. Pembuatan desain Knowledge Management
will be better able to make use of and improve their
(KM), sebagai salah satu sarana pengembangan
masteries of specific areas of knowledge.
SDM KPK melalui proses sinergi seluruh potensi
pengetahuan yang ada di organisasi KPK. 7. Preparing Talent Management design for the
Diharapkan melalui program KM, pegawai recruitment, training, and assignment of high-calibre
mampu memanfaatkan dan meningkatkan personnel in key positions of the organization, thereby
penguasaan pengetahuan dalam suatu bidang ensuring the sustainability of the organization through
kajian yang spesifik, untuk kemudian diaplikasikan the ‘regeneration’ of high quality human resources.
sehingga menciptakan nilai tambah dan
8. Conducting evaluations of the KPK Human Resources
meningkatkan keunggulan kompetitif organisasi
Management System through an Evaluation Team
KPK.
that will be made up of representatives from the Civil
7. Pembuatan desain Talent Management bertujuan Service Reform Department (MenPAN), the Department
untuk mendapatkan, mengembangkan, dan of Finance, the State Secretariat, the Cabinet Secretariat,
menempatkan pegawai yang memiliki tingkat the Civil Service Personnel Board (Badan Kepegawaian
kualifikasi tinggi dan yang mampu menghasilkan Negara), the State Administration Institute, and the
kinerja unggul, pada posisi-posisi kunci organisasi Corruption Eradication Commission. Evaluation of the
sehingga kelangsungan organisasi dapat terjamin application of Government Regulation No. 63 of 2005
melalui regenerasi SDM yang berkualitas. will be focused on implementation per each human
resources management pillar, with particular emphasis on
8. Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Sistem MSDM KPK melalui
improvements to the salary system and performance
Tim Evaluasi yang beranggotakan wakil-wakil dari
management.
Kementerian Negara Aparatur Negara, Departemen
Keuangan, Sekretariat Negara, Sekretariat Kabinet, 9. Establishment of the Human Resources Information
Badan Kepegawaian Negara, Lembaga Administrasi System (HRIS) as an integrated personnel database in
Negara, dan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi . Periode order to support personnel decision-making based on
2007 evaluasi pelaksanaan PP 63 Tahun 2005 lebih information and data that is accurate, up-to-date,
ditekankan pada proses pelaksanaan per pilar systematic, and accessable by all personnel online.
manajemen SDM, terutama penyempurnaan sistem
penggajian dan manajemen kinerja. Human Resources Composition 2007
9. Pembuatan Human Resources Information As of December 18th, 2007, the KPK employed 450
System (HRIS) sebagai salah satu sarana database personnel, with the details being as follows:
kepegawaian yang terintegrasi, untuk membantu
pengambilan keputusan kepegawaian melalui
informasi dan data yang tersaji secara akurat,
terkini, dan sistematis, yang dapat diakses seluruh
pegawai melalui sistem jaringan (online).
Komposisi SDM Tahun 2007

Sampai dengan 18 Desember 2007, KPK memiliki
pegawai sebanyak 450 orang, dengan perincian
sebagai berikut:

1. Menurut Unit Organisasi 1. According to Organizational Units
Komposisi Pegawai KPK Menurut Unit Organisasi

KPK Staff Based on Organizational Units
Pimpinan
(Commisioners)
5 (1,11%)
CPF
(Functional Personnel Candidate) 52 (11,56%)
2 (0,44%) Penasehat
(Advisors)
Setjen Pencegahan
(Secretariat General) 73 (16,22%) 80 (17,78%) (Preventive)
PIPM
(Internal Monitoring and 46 (10,22%)
Public Complaints)
Penindakan
120 (26,67%) (Represive)
INDA
72 (16,00%) (Information & Data)
2. Menurut Kelompok Jabatan 2. According to Job Groups
Komposisi Pegawai KPK Menurut Kelompok Jabatan

KPK Staff Based on Job Groups
Penasehat
(Advisor)
2 (0,44%)
Pimpinan
(Commisioners) 5 (1,11%) Struktural
26 (5,78%) (Structural)
CPF
(Functional Personnel Candidate) 52 (12,56%)
Administrasi dan Pendukung

(Administrative and Supporting) 118 (26%)
Fungsional Spesifik
Fungsional Umum
214 (47,56%) (Functional Specific)
(Functional General) 33 (7,33%)
3. Menurut Status Kepegawaian 3. According to Personnel Status

Komposisi Pegawai KPK Menurut Status Kepegawaian
KPK Staff Based on Personnel Status
Pegawai Negeri Dipekerjakan
(Seconded Civil Servants) 195 (43,33%)
5 (1,11%) Pimpinan
(Commissioners)
Pegawai Tidak Tetap

(Temporary Personnel) 58 (12,89%)
2 (0,44%) Penasehat
(Advisor)
190 (42,22%)
Pegawai Tetap
(Permanent Personnel)

Peningkatan Kapasitas SDM Human Resources Capacity Improvements

Dalam tahun 2007, program pendidikan dan pelatihan In 2007, the KPK’s education and training programs started
di KPK mulai dibuat secara terstruktur mengacu to be structured based on training needs analyses, and are
kepada hasil analisis kebutuhan pelatihan dan masih still organization-based. Education and training programs
berbasiskan organisasional. Program pendidikan dan conducted in 2007 were as follows:
pelatihan selama 2007 dijabarkan ke dalam program- 1. Training Needs Analysis
program sebagai berikut: The conducting of a training needs analysis were
facilitated by international consultants from
1. Analisis Kebutuhan Pelatihan
Investigator Training Internasional (ITI) with donor
Kegiatan analisis kebutuhan pelatihan difasilitasi
assistance from the Legal Development Facility (LDF).
oleh konsultan Internasional dari Investigator
The analysis included three phases: (1) identification
Training Internasional (ITI) dengan bantuan donor
of projects in 2006, (2) identification of training needs,
dari Legal Development Facility (LDF) yang meliputi
and (3) structuring of Lesson Plans and Calender of
3 tahap yaitu tahap (1) identifikasi proyek di tahun
Training. The training needs analysis resulted in a KPK
2006, (2) identifikasi kebutuhan pelatihan, dan (3)
training strategy and schemes, improved induction
pembuatan Lesson Plan dan Calender of Training.
processes and basic training for new personnel,
Hasil dari kegiatan analisis kebutuhan pelatihan
designing of modules and lesson plans, and Calendars
ini adalah strategi dan skema pelatihan untuk KPK,
of Training for 2008 and 2009.
penyempurnaan kegiatan induksi dan basic
training untuk pegawai baru, kumpulan modul 2. KPK Education and Training for New Personnel
dan lesson plan, Calender of Training untuk tahun The KPK’s education and training for new personnel is
2008 dan 2009. divided into two categories: Category A (fresh graduates)
and Category B (with work experience). In 2007,
2. Diklat Pegawai Baru KPK
category A inductions were conducted once, and
Diklat Pegawai Baru KPK dibagi menjadi dua yaitu
category B inductions were conducted 3 times.
kategori A (fresh graduate) dan kategori B (Pegawai
Orientations of category A personnel (52) were
dengan pengalaman kerja). Tahun 2007 telah
conducted for 5 days by each line unit (13 weeks),
dilaksanakan induksi kategori A sebanyak 1 kali,
which was followed by ‘job shadowing’ until April
dan induksi kategori B sebanyak 3 kali. Untuk
2008.
orientasi Pegawai KPK kategori A (52 orang)
dilakukan selama 5 hari di setiap unit kerja
(13pekan) dilanjutkan dengan Job Shadowing
sampai dengan bulan April 2008.
3. Diklat Peningkatan Kompetensi Pegawai KPK
Salah satu proses peningkatan kompetensi
pegawai KPK dipenuhi dengan cara melakukan
pengiriman peserta pelatihan di dalam negeri
maupun di luar negeri. Pelatihan di dalam negeri
ada yang bersifat pelatihan internal dan pelatihan
eksternal. Pelatihan yang sifatnya internal (swakelola)
dikelola oleh KPK, sedangkan untuk pelatihan
bersifat eksternal, KPK hanya memfasilitasi secara
administratif ke training provider.
Program pelatihan swakelola pada tahun 2007 ini
sebanyak 37 (tiga puluh tujuh) pelatihan, sedangkan
pelatihan eksternal sebanyak 42 (empat puluh
dua) pelatihan. Pelatihan yang dilaksanakan di
luar negeri sebanyak 12 (dua belas) pelatihan yaitu

di Hongkong, Singapura, Malaysia, Brunei 3. KPK Competency Improvement Education and

Darussalam, Thailand, Perancis, Swiss, Inggris, Training
Jerman, dan Australia. Improving the competencies of KPK personnel can be
enrolling staff in training either in Indonesia or abroad.
Jumlah hari pelatihan rata-rata per Pegawai Domestic training includes both internal and external
berdasarkan realisasi program pelatihan tahun training. Internal training is conducted by the KPK,
2007 ini sebanyak 9 (sembilan) hari pelatihan/ while in the case of external training the KPK facilitates
orang the training provider administratively.
4. Matrikulasi dan Sertifikasi
In 2007 t 37 internal training programs and 42 external
Matrikulasi Auditor dilaksanakan dalam 2 angkatan,
training programs were provided. There were also 12
Angkatan I (Maret 2007) diikuti oleh 17 peserta
training programs conducted abroad, namely, in Hong
dan Angkatan II (Oktober 2007) diikuti oleh 15
Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei, Thailand, France,
peserta, pelaksanaannya bekerjasama dengan
Switzerland, UK, Germany, and Australia.
BPKP.
The average number of training days per staff member
Sertifikasi yang dikelola secara langsung oleh KPK
based on the realization of training programs in 2007
terdiri dari Sertifikasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa
was 9.
dari Bappenas dan Sertifikasi CFE (Certificate Fraud
Examiner). Selain itu, ada juga pegawai di beberapa 4. Matriculation and Certification
unit kerja yang secara langsung mengikuti sertifikasi Auditor matriculation takes place over 2 weeks, and
yang penyelenggaraan dilaksanakan oleh pihak involved two intakes in 2007. Group I (March 2007) had
eksternal yaitu CIA (Certificate Internal Auditor), CISA 17 participants, while Group II had 15 participants.
(Certificate Internal Systems Auditor), dan CAMS implementation was carried out in co-operation with
(Certificate of Anti Money Laundering Specialist). the BPKP.
Khusus untuk CAMS merupakan sertifikasi atas
bantuan dari AusAID. Certification was organized directly by the KPK, and
included Goods and Services Procurement Certification
Sertifikasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa tahun 2007 (Sertifikasi Pengadaan Barang) by Bappenas, and CFE
dilaksanakan dalam 2 angkatan. Angkatan I (Maret (Certified Fraud Examiner) certification. In addition,
2007) diikuti oleh 16 peserta dan yang berhasil there were a number of personnel from different line
lulus sebanyak 12 peserta. Angkatan II (Oktober units who directly participated in external certification
2007) diikuti oleh 20 peserta dan yang berhasil lulus programs, including CIA (Certified Internal Auditor),
sebanyak 7 orang. CISA (Certified Internal Systems Auditor), and CAMS
(Certified Anti Money Laundering Specialist) programs.
Sertifikasi CFE tahun 2007 merupakan kelanjutan CAMS certification was made possible thanks to support
dari tutorial yang dilaksanakan tahun 2006, from AusAID.
Angkatan I dilaksanakan pada Januari 2007 diikuti
oleh 27 peserta dan yang berhasil lulus sebanyak Certification of Goods and Services Procurement
23 peserta. Sertifikasi CFE Angkatan II sedang dalam training in 2007 was participated in by 2 Groups. Group
proses dan diikuti oleh 18 peserta. I (March 2007) had 16 participants, with 12 graduates,
while Group II (October 2007) had 20 participants and
Tahun 2007, KPK telah merancang sistem 7 graduates.
sertifikasi yang tidak sekedar untuk pengakuan
kemampuan individu, namun berusaha CFE Certification training in 2007 was a continuation
memberdayakan sertifikasi sebagai alat untuk of the tutorials conducted in 2006. This also consisted
Knowledge Management dan implementasi of 2 Groups. Group I (January 2007) had 27 participants
hasil pelatihan dan peningkatan kualitas menuju and 23 graduates, while Group II is still receiving training
kesempurnaan. Sertifikasi tersebut terdiri dari: and has 18 participants.

t Certificate of Attendance (CoA), sertifikat

pengakuan bahwa peserta telah lulus dari
suatu program pelatihan dan pendidikan.
t Certificate of Sharing (CoS), sertifikat
pengakuan bahwa peserta telah melakukan
sharing hasil pelatihan dan pendidikan.
t Certificate of Experience (CoE), sertifikat
pengakuan b a h w a p e s e r t a t e l a h
m e n g i m p l e m e n t a s i k a n hasil pelatihan
dan pendidikan di lingkungan kerja.
t Certificate of Perfection (CoP), sertifikat
pengakuan bahwa peserta telah menjadi
teladan dalam bidang yang dilatihkan.
Mulai triwulan keempat 2007, telah dilaksanakan In 2007, the KPK designed a certification system that
b e b e r a p a k a l i t r a i n i n g t r a n s fe r, y a i t u not only reflects the individual’s abilities, but also
k e g i a t a n p e ny a m p a i a n kembali hasil attempts to strengthening certification itself so as to
pelatihan dan pendidikan sebagai salah satu serve as a Knowledge Management tool. This certification
upaya implementasinya CoS, khususnya pelatihan- system is composed of:
pelatihan luar negeri dan pelatihan yang kepesertaan t Certificate of Attendance (CoA), showing that the
dari KPK dibatasi oleh instansi penyelenggara. participant has graduated from a training/education
Untuk implementasi CoA telah dilaksanakan yaitu program.
bagi peserta yang tidak lulus atau tidak dapat t Certificate of Sharing (CoS), showing that the
memenuhi batas minimal kehadiran tidak diberikan participant has shared the results of his/her training
sertifikat. and education.
t Certificate of Experience (CoE), showing that the
5. Dukungan Donor dan Beasiswa
participant has been putting what he has learned
Selain dari anggaran APBN, kegiatan pelatihan
into effect in his/her work environment.
KPK juga berasal dari donor beberapa negara/
t Certificate of Perfection (CoP), showing that the
lembaga, baik itu dalam bentuk bantuan instruk-
participant has become a role model in the area for
tur, pendanaan sarana dan prasarana pelatihan,
which he was trained.
pengiriman peserta. Lembaga tersebut antara
lain LDF, USAID, AusAID, JCLEC, FCPP, JICA, ILEA,
Starting in the fourth quarter of 2007, training transfer
GTZ, dan Perancis.
events have been held on a number of occasions. These
are designed to spread the knowledge that has been
Bantuan donor juga diterima KPK dalam bentuk
learned as one way of implementing CoS, especially for
program Beasiswa, yaitu Beasiswa ADS dan
training conducted outside Indonesia, and training in
Wolongong yang merupakan bantuan dari
which the number of KPK participants was limited by
AusAID, Beasiswa Chievening dari Inggris, dan
the training provider. The CoA program has also been
Beasiswa dari Perancis. Dari pemerintah Korea
implemented – participants who fail to graduate or
Selatan melalui lembaga KOICA, KPK difasilitasi
satisfy the attendance threshold are not awarded CoA
bantuan pelatihan dan konsultasi tenaga ahli
certificates.
terkait reformasi birokrasi yang implementasinya
akan dilaksanakan mulai bulan April 2008. 5. Donor Support and Scholarships
Aside from the State Budget, the KPK’s training activities
were supported by donors from various institutions and
nations. This support took the form of infrastructural aid,
financing of training, and sending of participants on
training courses. The donors involved were: LDF, USAID,
AusAID, JCLEC, FCPP, JICA, ILEA, GTZ, and France.

Donor assistance was also received by the KPK in the

form of scholarships, namely, the ADS Scholarships
and Wolongong Scholarships, which were provided
by AusAID; Chievening Scholarships from England;
and Scholarships from the French Government. From
the South Korean Government (through KOICA), the
KPK was provided with training support and expert
consultants for the bureaucratic reforms which will be
implemented in April 2008.
6. Joint Workshops on Accelerated Corruption
Eradication
As a trigger mechanism, the KPK is continuing its joint
workshop program on Accelerated Corruption Eradication
with the State Audit Board, the Attorney General’s
Office, and the Police. This 2007 Workshop was held
from 26th to 30th of November in Jakarta, with the
focus on corruption eradication in the regions, which
6. Workshop Bersama Percepatan Pemberantasan necessitated the participation of the BPKP and the
Tindak Pidana Korupsi Supreme Court.
Sebagai trigger mechanism, maka KPK melan-
jutkan program workshop bersama perce- 7. Mental and Spiritual Support
patan pemberantasan TPK antara KPK, BPK, During Ramadhan, a Ramadhan Committee was
Kejaksaan, dan Kepolisian. Workshop tahun 2007 formed which undertook the following activities:
diselenggarakan pada 26-30 November di Jakarta, distribution of Ramadhan Guide, Sermons, and
dengan penekanan pada pemberantasan TPK di Kultum for each Ba’da Dzuhur, Nuzulul Qur’an
daerah sehingga kepesertaannya diperluas den- activities, Infaq Collections, Halal bi-Halal (gatherings),
gan melibatkan BPKP dan Mahkamah Agung. and Friday Prayers within the KPK.
7. Bimbingan Mental dan Spiritual For Christian personnel, October 2007 saw the launch
Pada bulan Ramadhan 1428 H dibentuk Panitia of a spiritual guidance program each Friday from 11.45
Kegiatan Ramadhan yang telah melaksanakan to 12.45, with speakers from outside the KPK being
kegiatan: pembagian Buku Panduan Ramadhan, invited to attend.
Ceramah menjelang Ramadhan, Kultum setiap
Ba’da Dzuhur, Peringatan Nuzulul Qur’an,
Pengumpulan Infaq, Halal bi-Halal, serta
pelaksanaan Sholat Jum’at di lingkungan KPK.
Untuk Pegawai yang beragama Nasrani, sejak

bulan Oktober 2007 telah dilaksanak an
pembinaan spiritual melalui ibadah bersama
(kebaktian) setiap hari Jumat jam 11.45 – 12.45,
dengan mengundang pembicara dari luar.

Pengawasan Internal Internal Supervision

Pengawasan internal menyediakan fungsi konsultasi, Internal supervision involves the functions of consultation,
evaluasi, dan memberi rekomendasi dalam lingkup evaluation, and the provision of recommendations in the
manajemen risiko, pengendalian, dan tata kelola, areas of risk management, control, and management in
untuk meningkatkan efektivitas dan efisiensi KPK general in order to increase the KPK’s effectiveness and
dalam mencapai visi dan misinya. Dalam upaya efficiency in achieveing its Vision and Mission. In the effort
mewujudkan organisasi yang profesional dan to create a professional organization of high integrity, the
berintegritas, pada 2007 KPK menjalankan program- KPK implemented the following programs in 2007:
program sebagai berikut:
t Improving Organizational Effectiveness and
t Peningkatan Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Organisasi, Efficiency, which was implemented through
yang dilakukan melalui kegiatan audit dan reviu independent and objective audits and reviews on
yang independen dan obyektif terhadap unit kerja line units and organizational functions within the KPK.
maupun fungsi-fungsi organisasi di KPK. Melalui Through these activities, weaknesses in management
kegiatan tersebut, diidentifikasi kelemahan dalam and control were identified, and remedial actions taken.
lingkup pengendalian dan tata kelola, dan In 2007, 5 audits and reviews were conducted on line
direkomendasikan tindakan perbaikan secara units and organizational functions.
berkesinambungan. Dalam tahun 2007, telah
t Improving/Strengthening Organizational Integrity.
dilakukan 5 (lima) kegiatan audit dan reviu reguler
Organizational Integrity is required by the KPK in its
terhadap beberapa unit kerja dan fungsi organisasi
role as a locomotive for the eradication of corruption.
yang ada.
In order to create an organizational culture that
t Peningkatan/Penguatan Integritas Organisasi. is characterized by high integrity, appropriate action
Integritas organisasi dibutuhkan KPK dalam must be taken against all irregularities, breaches, abuses
perannya sebagai lokomotif pemberantasan tindak of power, and violations of the KPK code of ethics by
pidana korupsi. Untuk mewujudkan budaya KPK personnel. Recommendations on remedial action
organisasi yang berintegritas, perlu dilakukan and guidance were produced after internal supervision
tindakan yang tepat terhadap setiap bentuk performed special audits. In 2007, 17 special audits
penyimpangan, pelanggaran, maupun were conducted into alleged breaches of the code of
penyalahgunaan wewenang dan kode etik ethics or abuses of authority following public
yang dilakukan pegawai KPK. Rekomendasi tindakan complaints.
perbaikan dan pembinaan dihasilkan setelah
t Strengthening of Control. The achievement of an
pengawasan internal melakukan audit khusus.
organization’s goals is influenced by that organization’s
Selama 2007 telah dilakukan 17 (tujuh belas) audit capacity to adapt to the environment and to anticipate
khusus atas dugaan pelanggaran kode etik dan risks that can affect the achievement of strategic goals.
penyalahgunaan wewenang, sebagai tindak lanjut The KPK assists its personnel in heightening organizational
dari pengaduan masyarakat. awareness of the risks faced, especially as regards
compliance with the laws and regulations in effect . In
t Penguatan Pengendalian. Pencapaian tujuan
2007, the KPK conducted three rounds of drugs tests on
organisasi dipengaruhi oleh kemampuan organisasi
staff through the testing of urine samples with the help
dalam beradaptasi dengan lingkungan dan
of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Narcotics Board.
antisipasi terhadap risiko yang dapat mempengaruhi
pencapaian tujuan strategis. KPK membantu para t Manual and SOP Development. The KPK Manual and
pegawai dalam meningkatkan kesadaran organisasi Standard Operating Procedures play a strategic role as
terhadap risiko yang dihadapi, terutama dalam they provide guidance for the execution of duties and
mendorong ketaatan terhadap peraturan dan decision-making. The Internal Supervision Manuals
perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Pada 2007, and SOPs that have already been produced, as well as
KPK telah melakukan tes narkoba melalui those still under development, include the following:
pengujian sampel urine pegawai/pejabat KPK Internal Supervision Charter, Internal Audit Manual,
sebanyak 3 (tiga) sesi, yang pelaksanaannya bekerja

sama dengan Badan Narkotika Provinsi (BNP) DKI

Jakarta.
t Pengembangan Manual dan SOP. Manual dan
Standar Operating Prosedur (SOP) memiliki peran
strategis karena dapat memberikan pedoman
dan arahan yang jelas dalam pelaksanaan tugas
dan pengambilan keputusan. Manual dan SOP
pengawasan internal yang telah dibuat maupun
dalam proses pengembangan, yaitu Charter
Pengawasan Internal, Manual Audit Internal, SOP
Kertas Kerja Reviu Laporan Keuangan, SOP Whistle
Blowing Program, dan SOP Penelaahan Pengaduan Financial Report Review Working Paper SOP, Whistle
Masyarakat. Blowing Program SOP, and the Public Complaints
Analysis SOP.
Dukungan Keuangan
Dalam Tahun Anggaran 2007, KPK memiliki dua Financial Support
sumber pembiayaan untuk seluruh program dan In Fiscal Year 2007, the KPK had two sources of funding.
kegiatannya. Sumber pertama adalah Rupiah Murni The first was direct support from the State Budget (APBN),
APBN sebesar Rp247.660.200.000,00 dan yang which amounted to IDR247,660,200,000.00, while the
kedua adalah hibah yang berasal dari beberapa second was grants from various donors, which amounted
donor sebesar Rp98.590.961.000,00. Sehingga, to IDR98,590,961,000.00. Thus, the total KPK’s budget for
total alokasi anggaran KPK untuk 2007 adalah sebesar 2007 was IDR346,251,161,000.00.
Rp346.251.161.000,00.
1. Pembiayaan Rupiah Murni APBN 1. State Budget
Dari pagu Rupiah Murni APBN yang dialokasikan
sampai dengan 18 Desember 2007 telah Out of the KPK’s budget allocation, as of
direalisasikan sebesar 60,46% atau senilai December 18th, 2007, 60.46% had been spent:
Rp149.779.093.179,00. IDR149,779,093,179.00.
t Realisasi Menurut Jenis Belanja t Realization by Type of Expenditure

Realisasi APBN RM Tahun 2007 menurut Jenis Belanja (dalam Miliar Rupaih)
IDR APBN Realization 2007 by Expenditure (Billion Rupiah)
120.000
96.646
100.000 94.145
80.000
65.740
60.000 56.869
43.299
40.740
40.000
20.000
0
Belanja Pegawai Belanja Barang Belanja Modal
Personnel Expenditures Material Expenditures Capital Expenditures
Pagu / Cap Realisasi / Realized

Realisasi Belanja Modal terbesar yakni 76,13%, Capital Expenditure accounted for 76.13% of spending,
disusul Belanja Pegawai sebesar 68,02%, Personnel Expenditure for 68.02%, and Material Expenditure
dan terakhir Belanja Barang sebesar 43,38%. for 43.38%.
t Realisasi Menurut Unit Organisasi (Kedeputian) t Spending by Organizational Unit (Office of Deputy)
Realisasi APBN RM Tahun 2007 menurut Unit Organisasi (dalam Jutaan Rupiah)
IDR APBN Realization 2007 by Organization Unit (Mllion Rupiah)
160.000
139.126
140.000
120.000
100.000 94.290
80.000
60.000 52.335
40.000 31.298 34.814
20.538
20.000 12.212 4.363 2.019
6.444
0
Setjen Pencegahan Penindakan INDA PPIM
Secretariats General Preventive Repressive Information and Data Internal Monitoring &
Public Complaints
Berdasarkan unit organisasinya, realisasi sampai By Organizational Unit, spending as per December 18th,
dengan 18 Desember 2007 untuk Deputi 2007, by the Office of the Repression Deputy accounted
Penindakan terealisasi sebesar 20,59% dari for 20.59% (IDR31,298,150,000.00), Office of the
alokasi dana sebesar Rp31.298.150.000,00, Deputi Prevention Deputy 59.47% (IDR20,538,285,000.00),
Pencegahan terealisasi 59,47% dari alokasi Office of the In¬ternal Monitoring and Public
anggaran sebesar Rp20.538.285.000,00, Deputi Complaints Deputy 46.28% (IDR4,363,234,000.00),
Pengawasan Internal dan Pengaduan Masyarakat Office of the Information and Data Deputy 66.52%
direalisasikan sebesar 16,28% dari alokasi dana (IDR52,334,596,000.00), and the Secretariat General
Rp4.363.234.000,00, Deputi Informasi dan Data 67.77% (IDR139,125,935,000.00).
terealisasi 66,52% dari alokasi dana sebesar
Rp52.334.596.000,00, Sekretariat Jenderal telah 2. Funding from Grants
direalisasikan sebesar 66,77% dari alokasi dana In 2007, the KPK received grants from various agencies/
sebesar Rp139.125.935.000,00. nations amounting to IDR98,590,961,000.00, of
which IDR12,058,316,012.00 had been spent as per
2. Pembiayaan dari Hibah December 18th, 2007, with the details being as follows:
Selama 2007, KPK mendapat hibah dari t ADB, for the Strengthening the Capacity of the KPK
beberapa lembaga/negara yang menjadi donor project, which included activities to develop the
sebesar Rp98.590.961.000,00, sampai dengan KPK’s Standard Operating Procedures; information,
18 Desember 2007 telah direalisasikan sebesar communication and technology (ICT) development;
Rp12.058.316.012,00 dengan rincian sebagai beri- operating information system development;
kut: investigation training; seminars and workshops,
t ADB pada proyek Strengthening the Capacity with a total aid amount being IDR2,450,000.00. To
of KPK; untuk kegiatan pengembangan SOP date, IDR2,355,983,171.00 has been spent.
KPK, pengembangan informasi, komunikasi

dan teknologi (ICT Development), pengembangan

operating information system, investigation training,
seminar, dan workshop. Dari total pagu hibah
sebesar Rp2.450.000.000,00, telah direalisasikan
sebesar Rp2.355.983.171,00.
t PGRI (Partnership for Governance Reform in
Indonesia) melalui proyek Crash Program to
Support the Anti Corruption Commission; untuk
kegiatan pelatihan penggeledahan, intelejen
dan perlindungan saksi, monitoring peradilan
dan kampanye UU Perlindungan Saksi, study
gap analysis, workshop, dan advokasi r PGRI (Partnership for Governance Reform in Indonesia)
advokat. Dari total pagu hibah sebesar through the Crash Program to Support the Anti
Rp1.616.100.000,00, telah direalisasikan Corruption Commission project; which included
sebesar Rp.1.431.017.005,00. training for the conducting of raids, intelligence
t ADB pada proyek Earthquake and Tsunami and witness protection training; law enforcement
Emergency Support Project (ETESP); untuk monitoring, campaigning for a Witness Protection
kegiatan pencegahan korupsi di NAD dan Law, gaps analysis studies, workshops, and
Nias, antara lain penanganan pengaduan “advocating to advocates”, with the total aid
masyarakat, pelatihan dan sosialisasi kepada budget amounting to IDR1,616,100,000.00. To
masyarakat Aceh, sewa kantor, sewa kendaraan, date, IDR1,431,017,005.00 has been spent.
survey, dan bimbingan teknis. Total pagu hibah r ADB, for the Earthquake and Tsunami Emergency
sebesar Rp3.187.900.000,00 dan telah Support Project (ETESP), which addressed anti-cor-
direalisasikan sebesar Rp1.023.234.892,00. ruption activities in Aceh and Nias, including help with
t DANIDA Support For KPK (Denmark); untuk the handling of public complaints, training
kegiatan pencegahan korupsi di DPRD, and socialising, office rents, vehicle leasing,
kampanye antikorupsi, peningkatan kapasitas surveys, and technical guidance. The total
teknologi informasi, dan peningkatan proses cap for the aid was set at IDR3,187,900,000,00, of
demokrasi di parlemen. Total pagu hibah sebesar which IDR1,023,284,892.00 has been spent.
Rp6.868.679.000,00, telah direalisasikan sebesar t DANIDA Support For KPK (Denmark); for
Rp5.359.291.048,00. corruption prevention activities at the DPRD
t USAID pada proyek Millenium Challenge (local parliament) level through anti-corruption
Cooperation Indonesia/Control of Corruption campaigns, information technology capacity
Project; untuk kegiatan pengadaan perala- improvements, and improving the democratic
tan Monitoring Center, survey IPK, dan sur- process at the local level. The total cap for the
vey penyuapan. Dari total hibah sebesar aid was set at IDR6,868,679,000.00, of which
Rp81.994.026.000,00 sampai saat ini belum IDR5,359,291,048.00 has been spent.
ada realisasi. t USAID through the Millenium Challenge
t CANADA–CIDA pada proyek Supporting Cooperation Indonesia / Control of Corruption
Awarness of Good Governance to Reduce Project; for the procuring of Monitoring Center
Corruption in the Government and Community; equipment, IPK surveys, and bribery surveys. The
merupakan kontribusi pemerintah Kanada total aid was set at IDR81,994,026,000.00 with
kepada Indonesia sebagai tuan rumah none of this having been spent to date.
Indonesia’s Anti C o r r u p t i o n E v e n t s y a n g t CANADA–CIDA through the project Supporting
d i s e l e n g g a r a k a n di Jakarta dan Bali. Total Awarness of Good Governance to Reduce
hibah sebesar Rp800.000.000,00 telah Corruption in the Government and Community;
direalisasikan sebesar Rp481.751.780,00; this is a contribution from the Canadian government
t GTZ pada proyek Supporting the Implementation of to Indonesia as the host of “Indonesia’s Anti Corruption
the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), Events” which were held in Jakarta and Bali. The total
German UNCAC Project, merupakan kontribusi

pemerintah Jerman dalam rangka aid amounted to IDR800,000,000.00 of which

p e n y e l e n g g a r a a n konferensi UNCAC IDR481,751,780.00 has been spent.
yang diselenggarakan di Jakarta, Indonesia. t GTZ through the project Supporting the
Total pagu hibah sebesar Rp659.750.290,00 Implementation of the UN Convention against
telah direalisasikan Rp651.947.748,00. Corruption (UNCAC); German UNCAC Project,
which is a contribution from the German government
in respect to the international seminar on Asset Recovery
and Mutual Legal Assistance that was held in Bali,
Indonesia. The total cap for the aid amounted to
IDR659,750,290.00, of which IDR651,947,748.00
has been spent.
t AUSTRALIA – AusAID, Australian government
support for the Seminar on Fighting Bribery in
Public Procurement, which will be held in Bali.
The aid is valued at IDR1,014,506,500.00, of which
IDR755,040,368.00 has been spent.
t AUSTRALIA – AusAID, dukungan pemerintah

Australia dalam rangka penyelenggaraan
Seminar on Fighting Bribery in Public Procurement
di Bali. Nilai hibah sebesar telah direalisasikan
Rp1.014.506.000,00, sampai saat ini telah
direlisasikan sebesar Rp755.040.368,00.
Realisasi Hibah TA 2007 menurut donor

Grant Realization 2007 by Donor
90.000
81.994
80.000
70.000
60.000
(dalam Jutaan Ruoiah)
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10.000 6.869
3.188 2.450 1.616 1.431 5.359 660 1.015
0 1.023 2.356 800 482 652 755
0
USAID-MCC ADB-ESTP ADB-4341- INO PGRI DANIDA CIDA GTZ Aus-AID

3. Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak (PNBP) dari 3. Non-Tax State Revenues (PNBP) from the Handling
Penanganan Kasus TPK dan Gratifikasi of Corruption and Gratuity Cases
Sesuai dengan tupoksinya, sepanjang TA 2007 In line with the KPK’s core duties and functions, PNPB
PNBP yang berhasil diperoleh KPK berasal dari dua in 2007 were received from two sources: from the
handling of corruption and gratuity cases, with the
sumber, yaitu penerimaan dari kasus TPK dan
total amount logged with the State Treasury as per
penerimaan gratifikasi dengan total nilai yang December 18th, 2007, being IDR48,403,649.506,00.
disetor ke rekening kas negara per tanggal 18
Desember 2007 sebesar Rp48.403.649.506,00. Of that total, corruption cases contributed
IDR45,513,032,038.00, composed of:
Dari total nilai tersebut, penanganan kasus TPK t Corruption compensation ordered by the Court
menyumbangkan sebesar Rp45.513.032.038,00 (MAP 424114): IDR34,312,007,190.00.
terdiri dari: t Confiscated Corruption Proceeds, as ordered by the
Court (MAP 424111): IDR8,055,173,827.00.
t Pendapatan Uang Pengganti TPK yang
t Revenue from Fines in Corruption Cases (MAP
Ditetapkan Pengadilan (MAP 424114) sebesar 423214): IDR2,250,000,000.00.
Rp34.312.007.190,00. t Revenue from Anti-Corruption Court Fees (MAP
t Pendapatan Uang Sitaan Hasil Korupsi yang 423215): IDR347,500.00
Telah Ditetapkan Pengadilan (MAP 424111) t Giro Services (MAP 423151): IDR895,503,521.00.
sebesar Rp8.055.173.827,00.
t Pendapatan Hasil Denda Kasus TPK (MAP Revenue from gratuities cases contributed
IDR2,890,617,468.00, composed of:
423214) sebesar Rp2.250.000.000,00.
t Gratuities ordered forfeit to the State by the KPK
t Pendapatan Ongkos Perkara Kasus TPK (MAP (MAP 424112): IDR2,886,808,144.00.
423215) sebesar Rp347.500,00. t Giro Services (MAP 423151): IDR3,809,324.00.
t Jasa Giro (MAP 423151) sebesar Rp895.503.521,00
During this first four years period, the budget
Sedangkan penanganan gratifikasi menyumbangkan provided for the handling of corruption and gratuity
Rp2.890.617.468,00 terdiri dari: cases amounted to IDR56,975,052,000.00, with budget
t Pendapatan Gratifikasi yang ditetapkan KPK spending amounting to IDR13,748,712,526.00, while
menjadi Milik Negara (MAP 424112) sebesar the non-tax state revenues (PNBP) received from the
Rp2.886.808.144,50 . handling of corruption and gratuity cases amounted
t Jasa Giro (MAP 423151) sebesar Rp3.809.724,00. to IDR68,353,337,863,00. The following graph
presents the breakdowns on an annual basis:
Selama empat tahun periode pertama ini, dana
anggaran yang disediakan untuk operasional
penanganan TPK dan gratifikasi adalah
sebesar Rp56.975.052.000,00 dengan
realisasi penggunaan dananya sejumlah
Rp13.748.712.526,00 dan PNBP yang diper-
oleh dari penanganan TPK dan gratifikasi adalah
Rp68.353.337.863,00. Adapun rincian per tahunnya
sebagaimana grafik berikut:

Perbandingan Anggaran, Realisasi, dan PNBP dari Penanganan TPK dan Gratifikasi
(Posisi 18 Desember 2007
Budget, Non Tax Revenue, and Budget Comparison from The Handling of Corrupt Conduct and Gratification
(per December 18th, 2007)
50.000 48.404
45.000
40.000
35.000
30.000
25.182
25.000
20.000
15.000 13.914 12.991

10.879
10.000
7.000 6.959 7.344
5.025
5.000
399 981
0
2004 2005 2006 2007
Pagu / Cap Realisasi / Realized PNBP/Non Tax Revenues
Infrastruktur Gedung KPK KPK Office Infrastructure

Sejak dibentuk pada awal 2004, KPK menempati 2 When the KPK was formed at the beginning of 2004, it
(dua) lokasi gedung kantor, yaitu: (a) Pimpinan KPK has been housed in two separate office buildings: (a) the
dan Deputi Penindakan di Jl. Veteran, Jakarta; dan (b) Commissioners and the Office of the Deputy for Repression
Setjen, Deputi Pencegahan, Deputi INDA, dan Deputi were housed on Jl. Veteran, Jakarta; while (b) the Secretary
PIPM di Jl. Juanda No. 36 Jakarta Pusat. General, Office of the Deputy for Prevention, Office of the
Deputy for Information and Data, and the Office of the
Seiring dengan meningkatnya volume kerja dan Deputy for Internal Monitoring and Public Complaints
personil, kebutuhan koordinasi yang erat antarbidang, were housed at Jl. Juanda No. 36, Central Jakarta.
dan kebutuhan keamanan dan teknologi, KPK perlu
mempunyai sarana dan prasarana yang memadai With the steady increase in work-load and personnel numbers,
untuk menunjang pelaksanaan tugas. Berdasarkan the need for tighter inter-deputy/ditrectorate coordination,
Surat Menteri Keuangan Nomor: S-164/MK.06/2005 and technological and security needs, it is clear that the
tanggal 20 April 2005, KPK mendapatkan izin untuk KPK needs infrastructure and facilities that are capable of
menempati Gedung eks-PT. Bank Papan Sejahtera supporting the task of combating corruption in Indonesia.
di Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav. C1, Jakarta Selatan. Based on Finance Minister Letter No: S-164/MK.06/2005
Untuk mengakomodasi kebutuhan KPK, maka dated April 20, 2005, the KPK was given permission to use
gedung tersebut perlu direnovasi sehingga dapat the building that formerly housed PT Bank Papan
menunjang pelaksaaan tugas-tugas KPK secara optimal. Sejahtera, on Jl. HR Rasuna Said Kav. C1, Jakarta Selatan.
Renovasi telah dimulai sejak 2005, dan telah dapat In order to accommodate the KPK’s specific needs, the
dioperasikan secara penuh pada 2007. building needed to be renovated. Renovation began in
2005, and the building has been operational since 2007.

The KPK intended to relocate to its new address in Kun-

Penempatan gedung baru KPK di Kuningan yang ingan on 11 December 2006, but was only able to do so
awalnya direncanakan 11 Desember 2006, terpaksa in early August 2007 as other institutions were still using
ditunda hingga awal Agustus 2007 akibat gedung the building, as well as a number of technical issues. The
tersebut masih ditempati oleh instansi lain dan new KPK building has 8 floors and houses 500 people: the
beberapa persoalan teknis lainnya. Gedung baru Commissioners, Advisors, the 4 Deputies’ Offices and the
KPK Kuningan terdiri dari 8 lantai yang diisi oleh 500 Secretary General.
orang, terdiri dari Pimpinan, Penasehat, 4 Kedeputian
dan Setjen. Information Technology Support
During the renovations to the Kuningan offices of the KPK,
Dukungan Teknologi Informasi
the necessary information technology facilities to support
Sejalan dengan renovasi gedung kantor KPK di Kuningan, the KPK’s work were installed. These include such facilities
dibangun pula prasarana teknologi informasi (TI) as IT Networking, a Building Automation System (BAS),
untuk mendukung operasional kegiatan KPK, berupa and an Integrated Security System (ISS). Aside from
IT Networking, Building Automation Systems (BAS), developing IT facilities, various computer applications
dan Integrated Security Systems (ISS). Di samping were also devised, including a Public Complaints Application,
pembangunan prasarana TI, dibangun berbagai Financial Applications, and the Human Resources
aplikasi komputer yang terdiri dari Aplikasi Pengaduan Information System (HRIS) Application. In 2007 the KPK
Masyarakat, Aplikasi Keuangan, dan Aplikasi Human IT Blue Print for 2008-2010 was designed, which is a mid-
Resources Information System (HRIS). Pada 2007 juga term plan to develop the KPK’s IT in line with the Draft KPK
telah disusun IT Blue Print KPK tahun 2008-2010 yang Strategic Plan for 2008 – 2012.
merupakan rencana jangka menengah pengembangan
TI KPK yang didasarkan pada (Draft) Rencana Strategis
KPK 2008-2012.

Penguatan Aspek Yuridis Strengthening of Juridical Aspects

Undang-undang mengamanatkan KPK agar mampu The legislation gives a mandate to the KPK to improve the
meningkatkan efektivitas, profesionalitas, dan intensitas effectiveness, professionalism, and intensity of corruption
pemberantasan korupsi baik yang dilakukan oleh eradication efforts, especially by the law enforcement
KPK maupun instansi lain yang berwenang, sehingga agencies that have been vested with anti-corruption powers.
diperluk an penguatan aspek yuridis. Untuk Accordingly, it will be necessary to strenthen the juridical
mewujudk an penguatan ini, KPK berperan aktif aspects. In order to realize this, the KPK has played an
dalam: active role in:
t penyusunan rancangan Perubahan atas Undang- t Drafting a bill to amend Law No. 30 of 2002 on the
Undang UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Corruption Eradication Commission;
Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi; t The membership of the Anti-Corruption Court Law
t keanggotaan Tim Penyusun Undang-Undang Drafting Team;
tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi; t The membership of the Corruption Eradication Law
t keanggotaan Tim Penyusun Undang-Undang Drafting Team, which will draw up amendments to
Pemberantasan Korupsi yang akan mengubah UU Law No. 31 of 1999, as previously amended by Law No.
Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 sebagaimana telah diubah 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication;
dengan UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang t Providing recommendations for the drafting of the
Pemberantasan Korupsi; Criminal Procedures Bill;
t pemberian rekomendasi tentang Rancangan t Drafting the Government regulation on Legal Immunity
Undang-Undang tentang Hukum Acara Pidana; for Corruption Eradication Commission Commissioners;
t penyusunan Rancangan Peraturan Pemerintah t Drafting a Joint Decree on Collaboration between the
tentang Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pimpinan Corruption Eradication Commission and the Department
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi; of Law and Human Rights in the area of Law Enforcement;
t penyusunan Rancangan Keputusan Bersama t Designing a State Grant Scheme through the Corruption
Kerjasama Antara Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Eradication Commission to the Department of Law
dan Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia and Human Rights;
di Bidang Penegakan Hukum; t Designing a State Grant Scheme through the Corruption
t penyusunan Rancangan Hibah Dari Negara melalui Eradication Commission to the Government of South
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi kepada Departemen East Maluku;
Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia; t Designing a State Grant Scheme through the Corruption
t penyusunan Rancangan Hibah Dari Negara melalui Eradication Commission to the Maritime Security
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi kepada Pemerintah Coordination Board.
Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara;
t penyusunan Rancangan Hibah Dari Negara melalui
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi kepada Badan
Koordinasi Keamanan Laut.

KPK Peduli KPK’s Social Responsibility

Di samping melaksanakan tugas pemberantasan Aside from performing its corruption eradication duties,
korupsi, insan KPK pun “peduli” pada lingkungannya. the KPK Organization and personnel take their social
Donor darah, bingkisan (parcel) bagi pegawai honorer, responsibilities seriously. This is shown by various activities,
dan bantuan bagi korban banjir, merupakan bentuk including blood donor drives, the giving of parcels to
nyata kepedulian itu. non-permanent staff, and the provision of assistance to
flood victims.

Pergantian Pimpinan KPK Hand-over of the Commissioners’ Offices

Pada 18 Desember 2007, pimpinan KPK periode 2003- On December 18th, 2007, the KPK Commissioners for the
2007 yang terdiri dari Taufiequrachman Ruki, Amien 2003-2007 period: Taufiequrachman Ruki, Amien
Sunaryadi, Tumpak Hatorangan Panggabean, Sjahruddin Sunaryadi, Tumpak Hatorangan Panggabean, Sjahruddin
Rasul, dan Erry Riyana Hardjapamekas secara resmi Rasul, and Erry Riyana Hardjapamekas officially handed
digantikan oleh Pimpinan KPK periode 2007-2011 over the leadership of the KPK to the KPK Commissioners
yang terdiri dari Antasari Azhar (ketua merangkap for the 2007-2011 period, who are: Antasari Azhar (Chairman),
anggota), Chandra M. Hamzah, Bibit Samad Rianto, Chandra M. Hamzah, Bibit Samad Rianto, Haryono, and
Haryono, dan Mochammad Jasin (wakil ketua merangkap Mochammad Jasin (all as Vice-chairmen). The new
anggota). Pengangkatan sumpah pimpinan KPK Commissioners took their oaths before the President of
periode 2007-2011 dilakukan di hadapan Presiden the Republic of Indonesia, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono at
Republik Indonesia, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono di the State Palace.
Istana Negara pada Selasa sore, (18/12).
After the palace event, the 2003-2007 Commissioners
Setelah pengangkatan sumpah, diadakan serah terima officially handed over leadership of the KPK to the 2007-
jabatan antara pimpinan KPK periode 2003-2007 2011 Commissioners during an event held at the KPK
kepada pimpinan KPK 2007-2011 yang diselenggarakan di Office in the afternoon. During this event, the 2003-2007
Gedung KPK. Dalam serah terima jabatan ini, pimpinan Commissioners also handed over official documents
KPK periode 2003-2007 secara resmi juga menyerahkan relevant to all activities and programs already concluded
sejumlah dokumen yang berkaitan dengan segala or still being pursued to the 2007-2011 Commissioners.
kegiatan dan program yang telah dan sedang dilakukan As a symbol of the end of their tenures, the outgoing
KPK kepada pimpinan KPK periode 2007-2011. Pimpinan Commissioners also handed over their ID cards.
KPK periode 2003-2007 juga menyerahkan ID Card
KPK sebagai simbolisasi berakhirnya masa jabatan
mereka.
Pada malam harinya, dilaksanakan acara pisah-

sambut antara pimpinan KPK periode 2003-2007
dan pimpinan KPK 2007-2011. Dalam kegiatan ini,
disampaikan pesan dan kesan pimpinan KPK periode
2003-2007 tentang pengalaman mereka selama empat
tahun memimpin KPK. Kegiatan ini dihadiri oleh
beberapa pejabat negara RI, anggota Kabinet
Indonesia Bersatu, para Duta Besar negara sahabat,
dan perwakilan lembaga-lembaga donor.

Sebagaimana termaktub di dalam UU 30 Tahun 2002, The 2003-2007 Commissioners took the opportunity of the
Pimpinan KPK merupakan penanggung jawab event held at the KPK office to share their experiences of
tertinggi KPK yang dipilih oleh Dewan Perwakilan leading the KPK for four years to various invitees, including
Rakyat Republik Indonesia berdasarkan calon State Officials, Indonesia United Cabinet Members,
anggota yang diusulkan oleh Presiden Republik Ambassadors, and donor countries.
Indonesia dan memiliki periode jabatan selama
empat tahun. As provided for in Law No. 30 of 2002, the KPK Commissioners
are the ultimate wielders of responsibility in the KPK, who
have been selected by the Parliament out of candidates
who have already passed selection by the President of the
Republic of Indonesia, to lead the KPK for a period of four
years.

Penindakan
Repression
Penindakan
Repression
“ Menangkap hingga menuntut koruptor di muka

pengadilan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-
undangan
Arrests to prosecutions of corruptors in
a court of law as per the relevant laws
“
Pelaksanaan tugas penindakan yang The implementation of the KPK ’s
diamanatkan kepada KPK adalah mandated repression activities range from
dengan menangkap hingga menuntut arrests to prosecutions of corruptors in a
koruptor di muka pengadilan sesuai court of law as per the relevant laws as well
dengan p e rat u ran pe ru nd ang - as the hopes of the public. Repression
undangan dan harapan masyarakat. activities are meant to have a deterrent
Hal ini diharapkan akan menimbulkan effect on corrupt behaviour. Repressive
efek jera dan meredam niat untuk corruption eradication is also conducted
melakukan korupsi. Pemberantasan through coordination and supervision
korupsi secara represif dilaksanakan activities, the handling of cases, transfer of
melalui kegiatan koordinasi dan cases, and the taking-over of cases.
supervisi, penanganan kasus/perkara,
pelimpahan, dan pengambilalihan
kasus.
Koordinasi dan Supervisi Coordination and Supervision

1. Kegiatan Koordinasi 1. Coordination
Kegiatan koordinasi dilaksanakan Coordination takes the form of
dalam bentuk rapat koordinasi coordinating meetings with Police and
dengan instansi Kejaksaan dan Attorney General’s O ffice officials
Kepolisian untuk membahas in order to discuss the handling
penanganan perkara-perkara TPK of corruption cases with 30 (thirty)
dengan 30 (tiga puluh) instansi, institutions, including coordination
antara lain koordinasi dengan involving: the Attorney General’s Office
Kejaksaan Agung, Mabes POLRI, (Kejaksaan Agung - Kejagung), Police
Polda dan Kejati Sumatera Barat, HQ, Regional Police Forces and
Polda dan Kejati Papua, Polda dan Provincial Prosecutor ’s O ffices
Kejati Sulawesi Utara, Polda Metro (Kejaksaan Tinggi - Provincial
Jaya, Polda dan Kejati Jawa Timur, Prosecutor’s Office) of West Sumatra; Re-
Polda dan Kejati Gorontalo, Polda gional Police Force and Provincial Prose-
dan Kejati Kalimantan Selatan, Polda cutor’s Office of Papua; the Regional
dan Kejati Kalimantan Tengah, Polda Police Force and Provincial Prosecutor’s
Jawa Tengah, Polda dan Kejati Office of North Sulawesi; the Jakarta
Sumatera Barat, Polda dan Kejati Metropolitan Police, the Regional
Riau, Polda dan Kejati Jawa Tengah. Police Force and Provincial Prosecu-
tor ’s Office of East Java; the Re -
gional Police Force and Provincial
Penindakan
Repression
2. Kegiatan Supervisi Prosecutor’s Office of Gorontalo; the Regional Police and

Provincial Prosecutor’s Office of South Kalimantan; the
Kegiatan supervisi dilaksanakan dalam bentuk
Regional Police Force and Provincial Prosecutor’s Office
penelitian dan penelaahan, serta gelar perkara
of Central Kalimantan; the regional Police of Central
hasil penyidikan atau penuntutan perkara TPK
Java, the Regional Police Force and Provincial Prosecutor’s
yang sedang dilakukan oleh Kepolisian dan
Office of West Sumatra; the Regional Police Force and
Kejaksaan berdasarkan Surat Pemberitahuan
Provincial Prosecutor’s Office of Riau; and the Regional
Dimulainya Penyidikan (SPDP) yang dilaporkan
Police Force and Provincial Prosecutor’s Office of Central
kepada KPK.
Java.
Beberapa instansi yang mendapat supervisi KPK
2. Supervision
dalam penanganan perkara-perkara TPK selama
tahun 2007, di antaranya: Supervision takes the form of studies and analyses of
the investigation or prosecution of corruption cases
t Mabes POLRI dalam: (a) penyidikan TPK
by the Police or the AGO based on an Investigation
dalam pengadaan 2 mesin PLTG TM Borang;
Commencement Notice (Surat Pemberitahuan
dan (b) penyidikan perkara TPK Dana APBN-P
Dimulainy Penyidikan - SPDP), where complaints have
di PT Perikanan Nusantara (Persero);
been made to the KPK.
t ,FKBUJ 4VNBUFSB #BSBU dalam: (a) penyidikan
TPK penyimpangan dana APBD Provinsi Sumbar
The various institutions that were the subject of
TA 2002 terhadap anggaran belanja DPRD;
supervision by the KPK as regards the handling of
dan (b) penyidikan TPK penyalahgunaan dana
corruption cases in 2007 were as follows:
APBD DPRD TA 2001-2002 pada DPRD Kota
Sawahlunto. Penyidikan kedua TPK tersebut t Indonesian Police Headquarteres in: (a) the
ditunda karena adanya perdebatan mengenai corruption investigation into the procurement of 2
PP 10; gas-powered electricity generators at Borang; dan
t 1PMEB4VNBUFSB#BSBU dalam penyidikan TPK (b) the investigation into a corruption case
di Dinas Kehutanan Kab. Kepulauan Mentawai involving the misuse of State Budget (APBN-P)
berkaitan dengan illegal logging; funds and PT Perikanan Nusantara;
t 1PMEB 1BQVB dalam: (a) penyidik an TPK t 8FTU 4VNBUSB 1SPWJODJBM 1SPTFDVUPST 0óDF in:
dalam penggunaan dana OTSUS Tahun 2004 (a) investigation of misuse of West Sumatra Budget
di lingkungan Pemda Kab. Teluk Wondama, (APBD) funds in 2002 by the local parliament;
yang saat ini sedang menunggu hasil audit and (b) investigation of misuses of regional

Pemberdayaan Penegakan Hukum / Empowering Law 41
Penindakan
Repression
BPKP Perwakilan Provinsi Papua; dan (b) budget funds in 2001-2002 in the city of Sawahlunto.
penyidikan TPK dalam pengadaan barang The investigations into both these cases had
inventaris mesin kantor pada Sekda Kab. been stalled due to a dispute over Government
Biak Numfor tahun 2001, yang saat ini P19, Regulation (PP) No. 110;
belum ada ijin tertulis dari Presiden untuk t 5IF 3FHJPOBM 1PMJDF PG 8FTU 4VNBUSB:
melakukan pemeriksaan terhadap Wakil corruption investigations into the Kepulauan
Bupati Biak Numfor; Mentawai Regency Forestry Department involving
t ,FKBUJ4VMBXFTJ6UBSB dalam penyidikan TPK illegal logging;
dugaan upaya suap kepada anggota DPRD t 5IF 3FHJPOBM 1PMJDF PG 1BQVB for: (a) the
Kota Manado yang dilakukan oleh Walikota investigation into alleged corrupt conduct in the
Manado periode 2000–2005. Berkas perkara use of OTSUS funds in 2004 by officials of the
tahap I telah diserahkan kepada JPU Kejati government of the Regency of Teluk Wondama,
Sulut dan setelah diteliti hanya 1 orang yang which is currently still awaiting an audit by the
cukup bukti selaku tersangka. Pada tanggal Papuan Provincial BPKP; and (b) an investigation
14 Maret 2006 dengan Surat Model P19, into the procurement of machinery by the Regional
berkas perkara tersebut telah dikembalikan Secretariat of the Regency of Biak Numfor in 2001 –
kepada Penyidik untuk dilengkapi. Tanggal as of the writing of this report, the President has not
25 April 2006, tersangka dan barang bukti provided his written consent for the questioning of
telah diserahkan kepada Kejati Sulut dan the Deputy Regent of Biak Numfor;
sedang dipersiapkan untuk dilimpahkan t /PSUI 4VMBXFTJ 1SPWJODJBM 1SPTFDVUPST 0óDF:
ke PN Manado; for the investigation of an alleged bribery attempt
t 1PMEB +BXB 5JNVS dalam penyidikan TPK involving a member of the Manado regional
pemalsuan jumlah stok beras/gabah di Perum parliament by the governor of the city of Manado
Bulog Sub Divre XI, dan penyidikan perkara for the period 2002 and 2005. The Stage I case file
TPK Penjualan tanah dan bangunan rumah has been delivered to the North Sulawesi Provincial
dinas PT IGLAS (Persero) di Surabaya; Prosecutor’s Office, and after analysis it was found
t ,FKBUJ +BXB5JNVS dalam: (a) penyidikan TPK that only 1 person could be charged based upon the
penyelewengan dana anggaran pos D P RD evidence as a suspect. On March 14th, 2006, based
dan Sekretariat DPRD Kab. Lumajang TA. on a P19 Form, the case file was returned to the
2002-2003; (b) penyidik an TPK dalam investigators to be completed. On April 25th, 2006,
pengelolaan APBD Kab Magetan TA the suspect and all the evidence were delivered
1999-2004; (c) penyidikan TPK penggunaan to the North Sulawesi Provincial Prosecutor’s Office
anggaran belanja DPRD Jember TA 2004; dan with a view to submission to the Manado district
(d) Penyidikan TPK gaji calon PNS di kantor court;
Departemen Agama Kab. Jombang; t 5IF 3FHJPOBM 1PMJDF PG &BTU +BWB: for the
t 1PMEB ,BMJNBOUBO5FOHBI dalam penyidikan investigation into the fraudulent recording of the
TPK pada pembayaran santunan eks PLG amount of rice stored by Perum Bulog (Bureau of
tahap IV Tahun 2005 di Barito Selatan; Logistics State-owned company) Sub Operations
t ,FKBUJ ,BMJNBOUBO 5FOHBI da l am : (a) Unit XI, and the investigation of corrupt activities
penyi dikan TPK proyek pengadaan buku concerning the sale of land and housing for public
SLTP/MTS di Dinas Pendidik an dan officials working with PT IGLAS in Surabaya;
K ebudayaan, dan (b ) penyid ik an TP K t &BTU +BWB 1SPWJODJBM 1SPTFDVUPST 0GGJDF: (a)
p enyimpangan atas pemberian kredit KUD investigation of corrupt conduct involving abuse
pa da PT Bank Pem bangunan D ae rah of funds by officials of the Lumajang Regency
K a l imantan Tengah; regional parliament and regional parliament
t 1PMEB 3JBV dalam: (a) penyidik an TPK secretariat in 2002-2003; (b) investigation of
penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam jabatan corrupt conduct in the management of the
pada proyek pembangunan jaringan internet Magetan Regency State Budget in 1999-2004;
TA 2002 di Kab. Natuna, dan (b) penyidikan (c) investigation of corrupt conduct in the
TPK penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam management of the Jember regional

Penindakan
Repression
jabatan pada proyek pengadaan bibit sapi p a r l i a m e n t a r y b u d g e t i n 2 0 0 4 ; a n d (d )

ternak bagi masyarak at miskin di kota/ investigation of corrupt conduct concerning
k abupaten se-Provinsi Riau TA 2006; salaries of candidates for public office in the
t ,FKBUJ 3 JBV dalam penyidik an TP K Jombang Regency Department of Religious
p enyelewengan dalam pemanfaatan hasil Affairs;
produksi hutan kayu tahun 2001; t 5IF 3FHJPOBM 1PMJDF PG $FOUSBM ,BMJNBOUBO for
t 1PMEB (PSPOUBMP dalam penyidikan TPK the investigation of alleged corrupt conduct in
penyalahgunaan pinjaman kredit pada relation to the payment of ex workers of PLG Phase
PT Bank BRI (Persero) Cab. Limboto tahun IV in South Barito in 2005;
2003-2006; t 5IF $FOUSBM ,BMJNBOUBO 1SPWJODJBM 1SPTFDVUPST
t ,FKBUJ(PSPOUBMP dalam: (a) penyidikan TPK 0óDF: (a) investigation of alleged corrupt conduct
APBD Kab. Gorontalo TA 2003 pada proyek in the procurement of SLTP/MTS level school books
pembebasan tanah dan pembangunan Mal by the Departement of Education and Culture, and
Limboto dengan cara mark up; dan (b) (b) investigation of KUD loan abuse in relation to
penyidikan TPK APBD Kab. Boalemo TA 2003 PT Bank Pembangunan Daerah (Regional
pada proyek peningk atan jalan pasar Development Bank) of Central Kalim¬antan;
Iloheluma-Suk amakmur; t 5IF3FHJPOBM1PMJDFPG3JBV: (a) investigation of
t 1PMEB , BMJNBOUBO 4FMBUBO dalam alleged abuse of office involving the Internet
p e n y i dikan TPK APBD Kab. Hulu Sungai Network Development Project in 2002 in the
Tengah pada proyek pembangunan SMAN 1 Regency of Natuna, and (b) investigation of alleged
Labuhan Amas Utara; abuse of office in a cattle breeding project
t ,FKBUJ,BMJNBOUBO4FMBUBO dalam: (a) penyidikan throughout Riau province in 2006;
TPK dana APBD Kab. Hulu Sungai Selatan TA t 3 J B V 1 S P W J O D J B M 1 S P T F D V U P S T 0 G G J D F :
2002-2003 pada pos belanja Sekda Kab. Hulu investigation of corrupt conduct in the exploitation
Sungai Selatan untuk pembayaran premi of forest wood products in 2001;
asuransi anggota DPRD Kab. Hulu Sungai t 5IF 3FHJPOBM 1PMJDF PG (PSPOUBMP: investigation
Selatan periode 1999-2004, dan (b) penyidikan of abuse of loans involving PT Bank BRI, Limboto
TPK penyalahgunaan APBD Kota Banjarmasin branch, in 2003-2006;
TA 2001-2004; t (PSPOUBMP 1SPWJODJBM 1SPTFDVUPST 0GGJDF: (a)
t 1PMEB +BXB 5FOHBI dalam: (a) penyidikan investigation of alleged corrupt conduct involving
perkara TPK pada anggaran tak langsung the Regional Budget of the Regency of Gorontalo in
kegiatan belanja pegawai DPRD Blora Tahun 2003, concerning land acquisition projects and the
construction of the Limboto Mall – mark ups were
suspected; and (b) investigation of alleged corrupt
conduct involving the Regional Budget of Boalemo
Regency in 2003 concerning the Iloheluma-
Sukamakmur Market Road Improvement Project;
t 5IF 3FHJPOBM 1PMJDF PG 4PVUI ,BMJNBOUBO:
investigation of alleged corrupt conduct involving
the Regional Budget of the Regency of Hulu Sungai
Tengah concerning the Labuhan Amas Utara High
School development project;
t 4PVUI ,BMJNBOUBO 1SPWJODJBM 1SPTFDVUPST
0GGJDF: (a) investigation of alleged corrupt conduct
involving the Regional Budget of the Regency of
Hulu Sungai Selatan in 2002-2003 concerning
expenditure by the Regional Secretariat on
insurance premiums for the Regency’s parliament
members in 1999-2004, and (b) investigation of
misuse of Regional Budget funds in the city of
Banjarmasin in 2001-2004;
Penindakan
Repression
2004; (b) Perkara TPK penyimpangan dana t 5IF 3FHJPOBM 1PMJDF PG $FOUSBM +BWB: (a)
APBD TA 2004 Kab. Banjarnegara pada pos investigation of corrupt conduct involving
dana tak tersangka; dan (c) penyidikan the indirect budget for personnel spending in the
Perkara TPK APBD Kab. Demak pada proyek B l o r a R e g i o n a l Pa r l i a m e n t i n 2 0 0 4 ; ( b )
dana bantuan keuangan pada pemerintah investigation of the 2004 Regional Budget for the
desa/kelurahan se-Kabupaten Demak; Regenc y of Banjarnegara, involving the
t ,FKBUJ +BXB 5FOHBI dalam: (a) perkara TPK contingency funds account; and (c) investigation
APBD Kab. Semarang pada proyek pengadaan of corrupt conduct involving the Regency of Demak
buku SD/MI TA 2004, yang saat ini P-21 dan Regional Budget concerning financial aid projects
telah diputus bebas pada putusan sela oleh to village/subdistrict governments throughout the
PN Ungaran Kab. Semarang, karena berk as Regency of Demak;
perk ara menyimpang Pasal 144 ayat (2) t $FOUSBM +BWB 1SPWJODJBM 1SPTFDVUPST 0óDF: (a)
KUHAP; dan (b) penyidikan perkara TPK dalam corruption case involving the Regional Budget of
pengadaan Mobil Pemadam Kebakaran the Regency of Semarang, concerning an SD/
Kab. Wonosobo TA 2003; MI-level schoolbook procurement project in 2004;
t ,FKBUJ,BMJNBOUBO5JNVS dalam penyidikan and (b) the investigation of corrupt conduct
perkara TPK berkaitan dengan 43 anggota involving the procurement of fire-fighting vehicles
DPRD Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. in the Regency of Wonosobo in 2003;
t &BTU ,BMJNBOUBO 1SPWJODJBM 1SPTFDVUPST
0GGJDF: investigation of corrupt conduct involving
43 members of the East Kalimantan Provincial
Parliament.
Penanganan Perkara
1FOZFMJEJLBO
Kegiatan penyelidikan yang telah dilakukan
sebanyak 68 (enam puluh delapan) kasus, dan
5 (lima) k asus di antaranya EJMJNQBILBO
LF,FQPMJTJBOEBO,FKBLTBBO, yaitu:
t Hasil Penyelidik an Dugaan TPK dalam
Pengadaan Rice Milling Plant (RMP) oleh
Perum Bulog ke Kejaksaan Agung (Surat ke
Jaksa Agung Nomor R-198/P.KPK/VI/07 tanggal
4 Juni 2007); 1SPDFTTJOHPG$BTFT
t Hasil Penyelidikan Dugaan TPK dalam Kegiatan 1SFMJNJOBSZJOWFTUJHBUJPO4UBHF
Tukar Menukar Beras (TMB) oleh Perum Bulog
The KPK conducted preliminary investigation activities
Tahun 2004 (Surat ke Jaksa Agung Nomor
in 68 cases, five of which have been transferred to the
R-267/P.KPK/VII/07 tanggal 12 Juli 2007);
Police and the AGO, namely:
t Hasil Pengumpulan Informasi Dugaan TPK
dalam Pembangunan WTC dan Ruko di t Results of preliminary investigation into the
Jambi tahun 2003-2007 (Surat ke Kepala procurement of a Rice Milling Plant by Perum Bulog
Kejaksaan Tinggi Provinsi Jambi Nomor (Bureau of Logistics - State Owned Enterprise) has
R-317/P.KPK/VII/07 tanggal 9 Agustus 2007); been transferred to Attorney General’s Office
t Hasil Penyelidik an Dugaan TPK dalam t Results of preliminary investigation into rice swap
Pengelolaan K euangan APBD pada deals by Perum Bulog in 2004, also transferred to
Pemerintah Kota Tarakan tahun 2005 dan Attorney General’s Office;
2007 (Surat ke Kepala Kepolisian Daerah t Results of information gathering process
Kalimantan Timur Nomor R-318/P.KPK/VIII/07 concerning the Construction of the WTC complex

Penindakan
Repression
tanggal 10 Agustus 2007); and shophouses in Jambi in 2003-2007. transferred

t Hasil Penyelidikan Dugaan TPK Penyuapan to the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office in Jambi;
Pejabat Indonesia oleh Monsanto Company
(Surat ke Jaksa Agung Nomor R-344/P.KPK/ t Results of preliminary investigation into the
VIII/07 tanggal 31 Agustus 2007. management of the finances of the Tarakan City
Government Budget (APBD) in 2005-2007.
Transferred to the Regional Police of East
Kalimantan;
t Results of preliminary investigation into the
bribery of various Indonesian public officials
by the Monsanto Company, a US corporation.
Transferred to Attorney General’s Office.
5FSUBOHLBQ5BOHBO
Tertangkap tangan (ontdekking op heterhand)
*O'MBHSBOUF%FMJDUP
adalah tertangkapnya seorang pada waktu sedang
$BVHIU3FEIBOEFE
"SSFTUT
melakukan tindak pidana korupsi, atau dengan Being arrested in flagrante delicto in the context the KPK
segera, sesudah, beberapa saat tindak pidana korupsi refers to a situation where an individual is arrested while
itu dilakukan atau apabila sesaat kemudian committing a corrupt act, or immediately after such an
ditemukan oleh khalayak ramai sebagai orang act(s), or is placed under citizen’s arrest, or is found
yang melakukanhya, atau apabila sesaat kemudian immediately afterwards in the possession of evidence
padanya diketemukan benda yang diduga keras that strongly suggests that he is the perpetrator of a
sebagai hasil kejahatan atau dipergunakan untuk corrupt act. Such arrests are provided for by article 1(19)
melakukan tindak pidana itu yang menunjukkan of the Criminal Procedures Code (Law No. 8 of 1981 on
bahwa ia adalah pelakunya atau turut melakukan Criminal Procedure).
atau membantu melakukan tindakan Pidana itu
(KUHAP atau Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun Based on accurate information or a report that a corrupt
1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana pada Pasal 1 act is likely to be perpetrated, the KPK will respond with the
butir ke-19). necessary action. In the case of an in flagrante delicto
situation, an investigator can arrest the individual without
Berdasarkan informasi atau pengaduan yang
a warrant .
akurat atas dugaan akan terjadinya suatu tindak
pidana korupsi, KPK segera menindaklanjutinya
Corrupt conduct by the perpetrator will be followed up
dengan melakukan tindakan yang diperlukan.
by the KPK with the initiation of an investigation into the
Da la m ha l seseo rang ter tangk ap t ang an
case, if the corrupt act satisfies the legal criteria that
melakukan tindak pidana korupsi, penyidik/
determines the threshold of cases that the KPK can pursue.
penyelidik dapat melakukan penangkapan tanpa
If such a case does not satisfy the KPK’s legal criteria, then
Surat Perintah Penangkapan.
the case will be transferred to the Police or the AGO, and its
Tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh pelaku handling will be supervised by the KPK.
yang tertangkap tangan akan dilanjutkan dengan
penyidikan atas perkara tersebut, apabila tindak
pidana korupsi yang dilakukan memenuhi kriteria
perkara yang dapat ditangani oleh KPK. Dalam hal
tindak pidana korupsi tenyata tidak memenuhi
krteria perkara yang dapat ditangani oleh KPK,
maka perkara tersebut diserahkan kepada instansi
Kepolisian/Kejaksaan dan perkembangan
penanganannya disupervisi oleh KPK.

Penindakan
Repression
2. Tahap penyidikan
2. Investigation Phase
Kegiatan penyidikan telah dilakukan sebanyak
29 (dua puluh sembilan) perkara, yang terdiri The KPK conducted investigations into 29 (twenty nine)
dari 8 (delapan) perkara sisa tahun 2006 dan cases, 8 of which were carried over from 2006, and 21 of
21 (dua puluh satu) perkara penyidikan tahun which were cases initiated in 2007:
2007 yaitu :
2006 Cases:
Penyidikan Sisa Tahun 2006 : t 3 (three) corruption cases related to involvement
t 3 (tiga) perkara TPK berkaitan dengan turut in, or facilitation of, corrupt conduct in the
serta atau membantu melaksanakan TPK implementation of a 1-million-hectare palm
pada pelaksanaan program pembangunan plantation development program in East
perkebunan kelapa sawit sejuta hektar Kalimantan, which was followed with the illegal
di Kalimantan Timur yang diikuti dengan issuing of logging permits;
penerbitan ijin pemanfaatan kayu secara t A corruption case involving the misuse of the
melawan hukum; Regional Leader Account of the Routine
t Perkara TPK dalam penyalahgunaan atau Expenditure Budget in South Kalimantan in 2001-
penggunaan tidak sesuai dengan peruntukannya 2004;
pada Anggaran Belanja Rutin Pos Kepala Daerah t A corruption case concerning the use of 2003
Kalimantan Selatan Tahun 2001-2004; Contingency Funds, General Transfer Funds,
t Perkara TPK dalam penggunaan dana APBD and Borrowed Funds in the Regency of Kendal;
TA 2003 pada Pos Dana Tak tersangka, Dana t A corruption case concerning abuse of power in the
Alokasi Umum (DAU) dan dana Pinjaman use of 2003 Regency of Kendal Budget, involving
Daerah Kabupaten Kendal; various funds: contingency funds account, general
t Perk ara TPK dalam penyalahgunaan allocation funds account, and regional borrowings
wewenang penggunaan Dana APBD TA account. The abuse of power is thought to either
2003 Pos Dana Tak Tersangk a DAU dan take the form of the unauthorized use of the funds,
Dana Pinjaman Daerah yang tidak sesuai or the embezzlement of such funds by a public
dengan ketentuan yang berlaku atau pegawai official;
negeri yang menggelapkan Dana APBD TA t 2 (two) corruption cases involving requests for
2003 Pos Dana Tak Tersangka DAU dan Dana monies that were unauthorized by the
Pinjaman Daerah di Kabupaten Kendal; Secretaries to the Directorates General in
t 2 (dua) perkara TPK dalam permintaan atau the Department of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
pemungutan dana yang tid ak ad a in 2002-2006.
p e n g a t u r a n ny a d a r i p a r a S e k re t a r i s
D i re k to r a t J e n d e r a l d i L i n g k u n g a n
Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan tahun
2002-2006.

Penindakan
Repression
Penyidikan Dimulai Tahun 2007 : Cases initiated in 2007 :

t 2 (dua) perkara TPK dalam pengadaan alat t 2 (two) corruption cases concerning the
Automatic Fingerprint Identification System procurement of an Automatic Fingerprint
(AFIS) pada Ditjen Administrasi Departemen Identification System (AFIS) by the Directorate
Hukum dan HAM RI tahun 2004; General of Administration at the Department of
t Perkara TPK dalam penyalahgunaan Anggaran Law and Human Rights in 2004;
Pembangunan dan Belanja Kas Daerah TA t Corruption case concerning the misuse of funds
2003, 2004, dan 2005 yang antara lain untuk from the Development and Spending Budget
Bandara Samarinda Kutai Kartanegara yang in 2003, 2004, and 2005, among others in
terjadi di Pemerintah Kabupaten Kutai connection with Samarinda Airpor t in the
Kartanegara Provinsi Kalimantan Timur; Regency of Kutai Kar tanegara (East
t Perk ara TPK dalam pengelolaan dana Kalimantan);
Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak (PNBP) terkait t Corruption case concerning the management of
pungutan tarif dokumen keimigrasian di Non-Tax State Revenues (PNPB) in relation to the
KBRI Kuala Lumpur Tahun 2000 s.d 2003; fees collected for the processing of immigration
t Perkara TPK dalam Pengelolaan dana PNBP documents at the Indonesian Consulate in Kuala
terkait pungutan tarif dokumen keimigrasian Lumpur from 2000 to 2003;
di KBRI Kuala Lumpur Tahun 2004 s.d 2005; t Corruption case concerning the management of
t Perkara TPK dalam Proyek Peningkatan Non-Tax State Revenues (PNPB) in relation to the
Kelembagaan dan Sarana dalam Pengadaan fees collected for the processing of immigration
Tanah di BAPETEN tahun 2004; documents at the Indonesian Consulate in Kuala
t Perkara TPK dalam Proyek Pengadaan Mobil Lumpur from 2004 to 2005;
Pemadam Kebak aran Merk Tohatsu Tipe t Corruption case concerning the Institutional and
V-80-ASM di Pemerintah Kota Makassar Facility Improvement Project in Land Procurement
APBD Tahun 2003 dan APBD Tahun 2004; in BAPETEN in 2004;
t Perk ara TPK dalam Proyek Pengadaan t Corruption case concerning the procurement of a
Mobil Pemadam Kebakaran Merk MORITA di Tohatsu Fire Engine Type V-80-ASM by the City of
Pemerintah Kota Medan APBD Tahun 2005; Makassar Regional Government through its
t Perkara TPK dalam Proyek Pengadaan Mobil Regional Budget of 2003 and 2004;
Pemadam Kebak aran Merk Tohatsu Tipe t Corruption case concerning the procurement of a
V-80-ASM dan Merk Tohatsu Tipe V-80-ASM MORITA Fire Engine by the City of Medan Regional
di Pemerintah Provinsi/Kota/Kabupaten Government through its Regional Budget of 2005;
Jawa Barat, Bali, Riau, Bengkulu, Medan dan t Corruption case concerning the procurement of 2
Makassar. APBN dan APBD Tahun 2003-2005; Tohatsu Fire Engines Type V-80-ASM by the West
t Perkara TPK dalam Proyek Pengadaan Mobil Java, Bali, Riau, Bengkulu, Medan and Makassar
Pemadam Kebak aran Merk Tohatsu Tipe Regional Governments through their Regional
V-80-ASM dan Merk Tohatsu Tipe V-80-ASM Budgets, as well as the State Budgets, of 2003
di Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. through to 2005;
APBD Tahun 2003 dan APBD Tahun 2005; t Corruption case involving the procurement of
t Perk ara TPK dalam proyek Pekerjaan 2 Tohatsu Fire Engines Type V-80-ASM by the
Pemeriksaan Penggunaan TKA/Audit Regional Government of the East Kalimantan
Investigasi pada 46 Kab/Kota TA 2004 pada Province through its Regional budgets of 2003 and
Ditjen PPK Depnakertans; 2005;
t Perkara TPK berkaitan dengan PNS atau t Corruption case concerning usage of expatriate
Penyelenggara Negara yang menerima labor in 46 Regencies and Cities in 2004 by the PPK
hadiah berkaitan dengan kekuasaan atau Directorate General at the Department of
kewenangan yang berhubungan dengan Manpower and Transmigration;
jabatannya; t Corruption cases concerning civil servants and
t Per k a ra TPK dalam penyim pang an public officials who accepted gifts in connection
penggunaan dana APBD Garut TA. 2004-2007;
Penindakan
Repression
t 2 (dua) perkara TPK dalam pengadaan with the exercise of the powers vested in his/her
perahu mesin dan alat tangkap menggunakan office;
APBNP tahun 2006 di Dinas Perikanan dan t Corruption case concerning the misuse of Regional
Kelatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah; Budget funds in Garut from 2004 to 2007;
t Perk ara TPK dalam pengadaan mobil t 2 (two) corruption cases concerning the
Pemadam Kebakaran Type V 80 ASM TA procurement of motor boats and fishing
2003-2005 di Pemerintahan Provinsi Riau; equipment using 2006 State Budget funds at the
t Perkara TPK dalam penyalahgunaan anggaran Marine Affairs and Fisheries Agency in the Province
belanja dan pendapatan daerah Kabupaten of Central Java;
Kutai Kartanegara; t Corruption case concerning the procurement of a
t 2 (dua) perkara TPK berhubungan dengan Fire Engine Type V-80-ASM in 2003-2005 by the
penyuapan atau pemberian sejumlah uang Regional Government of the Province of Riau;
kepada pegawai negeri/ penyelenggara t Corruption case concerning the misuse of local
negara; budget funds in the Regency of Kutai Kartanegara;
t Perkara TPK berhubungan dengan pengadaan t 2 (two) corruption cases involving the bribery of
peningkatan fasilitas mesin dan peralatan civil servants/public officials;
latihan di UPT/BLK Depnakertrans. t Corruption case involving the procurement of
facility improvements for machinery and training
equipment at the UPT/BLK (Department of
Manpower and Transmigration).
3. Tahap Penuntutan 3. Prosecution Phase

Selama tahun 2007, telah dilakukan penuntutan In 2007, 24 (twenty-four) prosecutions were brought,
24 (dua puluh empat) perkara, yang terdiri dari composed of 10 (ten) cases carried over from 2006 and
10 (sepuluh) perkara sisa tahun 2006 dan 14 14 (fourteen) new cases in 2007.
(empat belas) perkara tahun 2007: t Corruption cases involving illicit expenditure and
t Perkara TPK dalam pengeluaran atau misuse of contingency funds in the Regency of
penggunaan dana yang tidak sesuai dengan Dompu, 2003, 2004 and 2005;
peruntukannya pada Dana Tak Tersangka APBD t 2 (two) corruption cases involving procurements
Kab. Dompu TA 2003, 2004, dan 2005; made in relation to the Jakarta Busway Project,
t 2 (dua) perkara TPK dalam pengadaan bus funded out of the DKI Jakarta Regional Budgets of
pada proyek busway yang menggunakan 2003 and 2004;
APBD Provinsi DKI Jakarta TA 2003 dan 2004; t Corruption case involving the implementation of
t Perkara TPK dalam pelaksanaan Program the 1-million-hectare Oil Palm Plantation
Pembangunan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Development Program in East Kalimantan, which
sejuta Hektar di Kaltim yang diikuti dengan was followed by the issuing of a Logging Permits for
Penerbitan Ijin Pemanfaatan Kayu Tahun 1999-2002;
1999-2002;
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan barang
peralatan lab o rato r ium Pus at R is e t

Penindakan
Repression
Pengolahan Produk Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan t Corruption case involving the procurement of
dan Perikanan TA 2003; laboratory equipment for the Marine and Fisheries
t 4 (empat) perkara TPK dalam turut serta Product Research Center in 2003;
atau membantu melaksanakan TPK pada t 4 (four) corruption cases concerning involvement
pelaksanaan program pembangunan in, or facilitation of, corrupt conduct in the
perkebunan kelapa sawit sejuta hektar di implementation of the 1-million-hectare Oil Palm
Kalimantan Timur yang diikuti dengan Ijin Plantation Development Program in East
Pemanfaatan Kayu; Kalimantan, which was followed by the issuing of
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan Kotak Suara a Logging Permits;
untuk PEMILU Tahun 2004; t Corruption case concerning the procurement of
t Per k a ra TPK dalam turut ser ta at au ballot boxes for the 2004 general elections;
membantu melakukan TPK dalam pengadaan t Corruption case concerning involvement in, or
b u s p a d a Pr o y e k B u s w a y d i D i n a s facilitation of, corrupt conduct in the procurement
Pe r h u b u n gan Provinsi DKI Jakarta tahun of buses for the Jakarta Busway Project by the
2003-2004 dan pegawai negeri yang Jakarta Communications Agency from 2003 until
menerima hadiah, karena patut diduga 2004, as well as public officials who received gifts
sebagai sebab melakukan sesuatu atau tidak that might reasonably be suspected to be
melakukan sesuatu dalam jabatannya yang connected with the performance or non-
bertentangan dengan kewajibannya; performance of his/her duties in violation of his/
t Perkara TPK dalam pengelolaan dana PNBP her obligations;
terkait pungutan tarif pengurusan dokumen t Corruption case involving the management of
keimigrasian di KJRI Johor Bahru; Non-Tax State Revenues (PNPB), specifically, the
t Perkara TPK dalam pengelolaan dana PNBP fees paid for the processing of immigration
terkait pungutan tarif pengurusan dokumen documents at the Indonesian Consulate in Johor
keimigrasian di KJRI Johor Bahru yang terjadi Bahru;
pada Tahun 2001-2002; t Corruption case involving the management of
t 2 (dua) perkara TPK dalam permintaan Non-Tax State Revenues (PNPB), specifically, the
atau pemungutan dana yang tidak ada fees paid for the processing of immigration
pengaturannya dari para Sekretaris Direktorat documents at the Indonesian Consulate in Johor
Jenderal di Lingkungan Departemen Kelautan Bahru in 2001-2002;
dan Perikanan Tahun 2002 s.d. 2006; t 2 (two) corruption cases involving unwarranted
t Perk ara TPK dalam penyalahgunaan fee collections/requests by Secretaries to the
atau penggunaan tidak sesuai dengan Directorates General of the Departrment of Marine
peruntuk annya pada Anggaran Belanja Affairs and Fisheries in the years 2002-2006;
Rutin Pos Kepala Daerah Kalimantan Selatan t Corruption case involving the misuse of budget
Tahun 2001 s.d. 2004; funds in South Kalimantan in 2001 until 2004;
t Perk ara TPK dalam penyalahgunaan t Corruption case involving abuse of power in the use
wewenang penggunaan Dana APBD TA of contingency, general allocation, and regional
2003 Pos Dana Tak Tersangka DAU dan loans funds in the 2003 Regional Budget in
Dana Pinjaman Daerah yang tidak sesuai violation of the relevant rules or embezzled from
dengan ketentuan yang berlaku atau the Regional Budget of 2003 in the Regency of
pegawai negeri yang menggelapkan Dana Kendal;
APBD TA 2003 Pos Dana Tak Tersangka, DAU, t Corruption case involving the use of contingency,
dan Dana Pinjaman Daerah di Kabupaten general allocation, and regional loan funds in the
Kendal; 2003 Regional Budget in the Regency of Kendal;
t Perkara TPK dalam penggunaan dana APBD t 2 (t wo) cor r up t i on ca se s i n vol vi n g the
TA 2003 pada Pos Dana Tak tersangka, DAU, procurement of Automatic Fingerprint
dan Dana Pinjaman Daerah Kabupaten Identification System (AFIS) equipment by the
Kendal; Directorate General of Administration at the
t 2 (dua) perkara TPK dalam pengadaan alat Department of Law and Human Rights in 2004;
Automatic Fingerprint Identification System
Penindakan
Repression
(AFIS) pada Ditjen Administrasi Departemen t Corruption case involving the misuse of 2003, 2004,
Hukum dan HAM RI Tahun 2004; and 2005 local budget funds, including among
t Perkara TPK dalam penyalahgunaan Anggaran others the Samarinda Airport project by the
Pembangunan dan Belanja Kas Daerah TA Regional Government of the Regency of Kutai
2003, 2004, dan 2005 yang antara lain untuk Kartanegara in East Kalimantan;
Bandara Samarinda Kutai Kartanegara yang t Corruption cases involving the management of
terjadi di Pemerintah Kabupaten Kutai Non-Tax State Revenues in relation to the fees
Kartanegara Provinsi Kalimantan Timur; collected for the processing of immigration
t Perkara TPK dalam Pengelolaan dana PNBP documents at the Indonesian Consulate in Kuala
terkait pungutan tarif dokumen keimigrasian Lumpur for the years 2000 until 2003;
di KBRI Kuala Lumpur Tahun 2000 s.d. 2003; t Corruption case involving the Institutional and
t Perkara TPK dalam Proyek Peningkatan Facility Improvement Project in the BAPETEN Land
Kelembagaan dan Sarana dalam Pengadaan Procurement of 2004;
Tanah di BAPETEN Tahun 2004; t Corruption case involving the procurement of a
t Perkara TPK dalam Proyek Pengadaan Mobil Tohatsu Fire Engine Type V-80-ASM by the City of
Pemadam Kebak aran Merk Tohatsu Tipe Makassar Regional Government through its
V-80-ASM di Pemerintah Kota Makassar Regional Budget of 2004.
APBD Tahun 2003 dan APBD Tahun 2004.
4. Resolved Cases
4. Perkara Inkracht A total of 21 (twenty-one) cases have been conclusively
Perkara yang telah memperoleh kekuatan resolved over the course of the year:
hukum tetap adalah sejumlah 21 (dua puluh
satu) perkara, yaitu: Final Verdict at First Instance
t Corruption case involving the illicit use of
Perkara Inkracht Tanpa Upaya Hukum ontingency funds from the Regional Budget of the
t Perk ara TPK dalam pengeluaran atau Regency of Dompu in the years 2003, 2004, and
penggunaan dana yang tidak sesuai dengan 2005;
peruntukannya pada Dana Tak Tersangka t Corruption case involving the procurement of
APBD Kab. Dompu TA 2003, 2004, dan 2005; buses for the Jakarta Busway Project, which was
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan bus pada funded by the DKI Jakarta Regional Budget for the
proyek busway yang menggunakan APBD years 2003 and 2004;
Provinsi DKI Jakarta Tahun 2003 dan 2004; t Corruption case involving the procurement of
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan barang laboratory equipment for the Marine and Fisheries
peralatan labo rato r ium Pus at R is e t Products Research Center in 2003;
Pengo lahan Pro duk So sial Ek o no m i t Corruption case involving the procurement of
K elautan dan Perikanan TA 2003; ballot boxes for the 2004 general elections;
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan Kotak Suara t Corruption case involving the management of
untuk PEMILU Tahun 2004; Non-Tax State Revenues, specifically, the fees paid
t Perkara TPK dalam pengelolaan dana for the processing of immigration documents at
PNBP terkait pungutan tarif pengurusan the Indonesian Consulate in Johor Baru during the
dokumen keimigrasian di KJRI Johor Bahru period from 2001 until 2002;
yang terjadi pada tahun 2001-2002; t 2 (two) corruption cases concerning
t 2 (dua) perk ara TPK dalam turut ser ta involvement in, or facilitation of, corrupt conduct
atau membantu melakuk an TPK dalam during the procurement of buses for the Jakarta
pengadaan bus pada Proyek Busway di Busway Project at the Jakarta Communications
Dinas Perhubungan Provinsi DKI Jakarta Agency in 2003-2004, as well as concerning a
tahun 2003-2004 dan pegawai negeri public official who accepted a gift that might be
yang menerima hadiah, karena patut diduga reasonably suspected to have been given due to
sebagai sebab melakukan sesuatu atau tidak his/her per/non-performance of his/her official
duties, contrary to his/her obligations;
Penindakan
Repression
melakukan sesuatu dalam jabatannya t Corruption case concerning the request for or
yang bertentangan dengan kewajibannya; collection of unwarranted fees by Secretaries to the
t Per k a ra TPK dalam per mintaan at au Directorates General at the Department of Marine
pemungutan dana yang tidak ad a Affairs and Fisheries from 2002 until 2006.
pengaturannya dari para Sekretaris Direktorat
Jenderal di Lingkungan Departemen Kelautan Final Verdict after Appeal
dan Perikanan Tahun 2002 s.d. 2006.
t Corruption case concerning the sale of land
belonging to PT Industri Sandang Nusantara,
Perkara Inkracht Setelah Upaya Hukum Bandung branch;
t Perkara TPK dalam penjualan aset tanah milik t Corruption case concerning the procurement of RRI
PT Industri Sandang Nusantara (Persero) broadcasting equipment in 2003;
Cabang Bandung; t Corruption case concerning bribery attempts/
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan pemancar extortion of witnesses;
RRI TA 2003; t Corruption case concerning the implementation of
t Perk ara TPK dalam usaha penyuapan/ the Indonesia Investment Year Project from 2003 to
pemerasan terhadap saksi; 2004;
t Perk ara TPK dalam pelaksanaan proyek t 2 (two) corruption cases involving the procurement
Indonesia Investment Year Tahun 2003-2004; of seals for ballot papers used in the general
t 2 (dua) perkara TPK dalam pengadaan segel elections of 2004;
sampul surat suara Pemilu Tahun 2004; t 2 (two) corruption cases involving the bribery
t 2 (dua) perk ara TPK dalam percobaan attempt of a Supreme Court Judge during the
penyuapan kepada hakim pada MA dalam Probosutedjo cassation/appeal case;
perkara kasasi Probosutedjo; t Corruption case involving the procurement of ink
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan tinta untuk during the Legislative Elections;
kepentingan Pemilu Legislatif; t Corruption case involving the procurement of
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan buku dan books and printed material during the General
barang cetakan untuk kepentingan Pemilu Elections of 2004;
Tahun 2004; t Corruption case involving the procurement of
t Perkara TPK dalam pengadaan barang dan laboratory goods and services for the Department
jasa peralatan laboratorium pada Departemen of Marine Affairs and Fisheries;
Kelautan dan Perikanan; t Corruption case concerning involvement in, or
t Perkara TPK dalam turut serta atau membantu fa c i l i t a t i on of, cor r up t con d uc t i n the
melaksanakan TPK pada pelaksanaan program implementation of the 1-million-hectare Oil Palm
pembangunan perkebunan kelapa sawit Plantation Development Program in East
sejuta hektar Kalimantan Timur yang diikuti Kalimantan, which was followed by the issuing of
dengan penerbitan ijin pemanfaatan kayu. logging permits.
5. Eksekusi
Pelaksanaan putusan tahun 2007 adalah sejumlah 5. Execution
23 (dua puluh tiga) perkara, sebagai berikut:
A total of 23 (twenty-three) judicial decisions were
t Pe r k a r a a t a s n a m a L I E M K I A N Y I N executed in 2007:
berhubungan dengan penjualan
aset tanah milik PT Industri Sand a n g t -*&. ,*"/ :*/T case: in relation to the sale of
Nusantara (Persero) Cabang Bandung; land belonging to PT Industri Sandang
Putusan: pidana penjara 4 tahun, denda Nusantara, Band¬ung branch; Verdict: 4 years
Rp1.000.000.000,00 subs i d a i r 1 0 b u l a n , jail, IDR1,000,000,000.00 fine (10 months
uang pengganti Rp24.006.438.333,00; additional jail time for non-payment), ordered
apabila uang tidak dibayar harta to pay a compensation of IDR24,006,438,333.00;

Penindakan
Repression
ak an disita dan dilelang, apabila if fine not paid, assets to be confiscated and
harta yang dilelang tidak mencukupi auctioned, and if auctioned assets do not satisfy
diganti pidana penjara 3 tahun; the fine, then 3 years additional time in detention;
t Per k ara atas nama KUNTJORO t ,6/5+030 )&/%3"350/0T case: in relation to
HENDRARTONO berhubungan dengan the sale of land belonging to PT Industri Sandang
penjualan aset tanah milik PT Industri Nusantara, Bandung branch; Verdict: 10 years jail,
Sandang Nusantara (Persero) Cabang IDR1,000,000,000.00 fine (10 months’ additional
Bandung; Putusan: pidana penjara selama 10 jail time for non-payment) ordered to pay a
tahun, denda Rp1.000.000.000,00 subsidair 10 compensation of IDR24,006,438,333.00; if fine not
bulan, uang pengganti Rp24.006.438.333,00; paid, assets to be confiscated and auctioned, and if
jika tidak membayar paling lama 1 bulan auctioned assets do not satisfy the fine then 3 years
sesudah putusan memperoleh kekuatan additional time in jail;
hukum tetap maka harta bendanya dapat r 364"%*,"/5"13"8*3"T case: in relation to the
disita dan dilelang untuk membayar uang procurement of ink for the legislative elections;
pengganti; apabila tidak mencukupi maka Verdict: 4 years jail, IDR200,000,000.00 fine (2
akan diganti pidana penjara 3 tahun; months additional detention time for failure
t Perkara atas nama RUSADI KANTAPRAWIRA to pay);
berhubungan dengan pengadaan tinta untuk r ."-&. 1"(* 4*/6)"+*T case: in relation to
kepentingan Pemilu Legislatif; Putusan: pidana attempts to bribe a Supreme Court Judge in the
penjara 4 tahun, denda Rp 200.000.000,00 Probosutedjo cassation/appeal case; Verdict: 3
subsidair 2 bulan kurungan; years 6 months jail, IDR150,000,000.00 fine – if fine
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa MALEM PAG I is unpaid, an extra 6 months in detention;
SINUHAJI berhubungan dengan perc o baan t '")3"/* 46)"*.*T case: in relation to the
penyuapan kepada hakim pada MA dalam procurement of an RRI transmitter; Verdict: 10
perkara kasasi Probosutedjo; Putusan: years jail, IDR300,000,000.00 fine – if fine is unpaid,
pidana penjara 3 tahun 6 bulan, denda Rp an extra 6 months in detention; ordered to pay
150.000.000,00 dengan ketentuan apabila a compensation of IDR 9,640,568,857.00;
denda tidak dibayar diganti dengan kurungan t "#6#","3 ")."%T case: in relation to illicit
6 bulan; expenditures / use of contingency funds in
t Per k ara atas nama FAHRANI SUHAIMI the Regency of Dompu’s in 2003, 2004 and
berhubungan dengan pengadaan pemancar 2005; Verdict: 2 years jail, IDR150,000,000.00
RRI TA 2003; Putusan: pidana penjara 10 fine – if fine is unpaid, an extra 3 years in
tahun, denda Rp 300.000.000,00 dengan detention; ordered to pay a compensation of
ketentuan apabila denda tersebut tidak IDR655,000,000.00 not later than 1 month
dibayar akan diganti dengan pidana kurungan after decision enters into conclusive legal effect;
6 bulan, uang pengganti Rp 9.640.568.857,00; if money not repaid, an extra 6 years detention;
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa ABUBAKAR t "/%+"3 461"3."/T case: in relation to the
AHMAD berhubungan dengan pengeluaran procurement of laboratory equipment for the
atau penggunaan dana yang tidak sesuai Marine and Fisheries Product Research Center in
dengan peruntukannya pada Dana Tak 2003; Verdict: 4 years jail and IDR200,000,000.00
Tersangka APBD Kab. Dompu TA 2003, 2004, fine (2 months extra in detention if not paid);
dan 2005; Putusan: pidana penjara 2 tahun, t 3645". &''&/%:T case: in relation to the
denda sebesar Rp150.000.000,00 apabila procurement of buses for the Jakarta Busway
denda tidak dibayar diganti dengan pidana Project which was funded by the Jakarta
kurungan 3 tahun, uang pengganti sebesar Regional Budget for the years 2003 and 2004;
Rp655.000.000,00 paling lama dalam waktu Verdict: 3 years jail, IDR200,000,000.00 fine (6
1 bulan setelah memperoleh kekuatan hukum months extra in detention if not paid);
tetap, apabila uang pengganti tidak dibayar
akan dipidana selama 6 bulan penjara;
t Perk ara atas nama terdakwa ANDJAR
SUPAR MAN ber hubungan d e ng an
Penindakan
Repression
pengadaan barang peralatan laboratorium t 461"3."/T case: in relation to attempts

Pusat Riset Pe n g o l a h a n Pro d u k S o s i a l to bribe / extort witnesses; Verdict: 8 years jail,
Ek onomi Kelautan dan Perikanan TA 2003; IDR200,000,000.00 fine (6 months extra in
Putusan: pidana penjara selama 4 t a h u n , detention if not paid);
d e n d a R p 200.000.000,00 subsidair 2 t 43*:"%*T case: in relation to attempts to bribe a
bulan; Supreme Court Judge during the cassation/
t Per k a ra atas nama terdak wa RUSTAM appeal in the Probosutedjo case; Verdict: 3 years
EFFENDY berhubungan dengan pengadaan 6 months jail, IDR150,000,000.00 fine – if fine is
bus pada proyek busway yang menggunakan unpaid, an extra 6 months in detention;
APBD Propinsi DKI Jakarta Tahun 200 3 d an t "$)."% 30+"%*T case: in relation to the
2004; Putusan: pidana penjara 3 tahun, denda procurement of ink for the legislative elections.
Rp200.000.000,00 subsidair 6 bulan kurungan; Verdict: Leave to Appeal denied, High Court”s
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa SUPARMAN Verdict: 4 years jail and IDR200,000,000.00 fine;
berhubungan dengan usaha penyuapan/ t 5)&0 ' 50&.*0/T case: in relation to the
pemerasan terhadap saksi; Putusan: pidana Indonesia Investment Year Project of 2003-2004;
penjara 8 tahun, denda Rp200.000.000,00 Verdict: 6 years jail, IDR300,000,000.00 (3 months
subsidair 6 bulan kurungan; extra in detention if not paid), ordered to pay a
t Per k a ra atas nama terdak wa SRIYADI compensation of IDR23,115,000,000.00;
berhubungan dengan percobaan penyuapan t ) 46)"350:0T case: in relation to the bribery
kepada hakim pada MA dalam perkara kasasi attempt on a Supreme Court Judge during the
Probosutedjo; Putusan: pidana penjara 3 Probosutedjo cassation/appeal; Verdict: 3 years
tahun 6 bulan, denda Rp150.000.000,00 jail, IDR150,000,000.00 fine (6 months extra
dengan ketentuan apabila denda tidak detention if unpaid);
dibayar diganti dengan kurungan 6 bulan; r 10/0 8"-6:0T case: in relation to the bribery
t Perk ara atas nama ACHMAD ROJADI attempt on a Supreme Court Judge during the
berhubungan dengan pengadaan tinta untuk Probosutedjo cassation/appeal; Verdict: 5 years
kepentingan Pemilu Legislatif; Putusan: jail, IDR150,000,000.00 fine (6 months extra
Menolak Permohonan Kasasi, berdasarkan detention if unpaid);
Putusan PT: pidana penjara 4 tahun dan t 4*-7*3" "/"/%"T case: in relation to
denda Rp200.000.000,00; complicity in or facilitation of corrupt conduct by
t Per k a ra atas nama terdak wa T H E O RUSTAM EFFENDI during the bus procurement
F. TOE MION ber hubungan de ng an phase of the Jakarta Busway Project by the
pelaksanaan proyek Indonesia Jakarta Communications Agency in 2003-2004, as
I nvestm ent Year Tahun 2003 - 2004; well as the giving of a gift to a public official that
Putusan: pidana penjara 6 tahun, denda might reasonably be expected to have been
Rp300.000.000,00 subsidair 3 bulan, uang connected with the discharge of his/her official
pengganti Rp23.115.000.000,00; duties, contrary to his/her obligations; Verdict: 2
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa H. SUHARTOYO years jail, IDR50,000,000.00 fine – if fine is unpaid,
berhubungan dengan percobaan penyuapan an extra 3 months in detention;
kepada hakim pada MA dalam perkara kasasi t 4*)0- 1 ."/6-"/(T case: in relation to the
Probosutedjo; Putusan: pidana penjara 3 procurement of ballot boxes for the 2004 general
tahun, denda Rp150.000.000,00 subsidair 6 elections; Verdict: 4 years jail, IDR200,000,000.00
bulan; fine (3 months extra detention if unpaid);
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa PONO WALUYO t &%" .",.63T case: in relation to the
berhubungan dengan percobaan penyuapan management of Non-Tax State Revenues from
kepada hakim pada MA dalam perkara kasasi fees paid for the processing of immigration
Probosutedjo; Putusan: pidana penjara 5 documents at the Indonesian Consulate in Johor
tahun, denda Rp150.000.000,00 subsidair 6 Bahru in 2001-2002; Verdict: 2 years less
bulan; detention period, IDR50,000,000.00 fine (3 months
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa SILVIRA extra in detention if not paid), ordered to pay
ANANDA berhubungan dengan turut serta
Penindakan
Repression
atau membantu RUSTAM EFFENDI melakukan a compensation of IDR791,414,000.00 payable

TPK dalam pengadaan bus pada Proyek at the most 1 month after decision enters into
Busway di Dinas Perhubungan Provinsi DKI conclusive legal effect; if unpaid, an extra 1 year in
Jakarta tahun 2003-2004 dan pegawai negeri detention;
yang menerima hadiah, karena patut diduga t 6/56/( 4"453" 8*+":"T case: in relation
sebagai sebab melakukan sesuatu atau to the procurement of ballot seals for the
tidak melakukan sesuatu dalam jabatannya general elections of 2004; Verdict: 5 years jail,
yang bertentangan dengan kewajibannya; IDR250,000,000.00 fine (3 months extra in jail
Putusan: pidana penjara 2 tahun, denda if not paid), ordered to pay a compensation of
Rp50.000.000,00 apabila denda tidak diba- IDR3,540,968,027.16, payable at the most 1 month
yar diganti dengan pidana penjara selama after decision enters into conclusive legal effect;
3 bulan; should the defendant lack sufficient assets to make
t Perk ara atas nama terdakwa SIHOL P. restitution, then he must serve an additional 5
MANULANG ber hubungan d e ng an years in detention;
p engadaan Kotak Suara untuk PEMILU t %""/ %*."3"T case: in relation to the
Tahun 2004; Putusan: pidana penjara 4 procurement of ballot seals for the general
tahun, denda Rp200.000.000,00 subsidair elections of 2004; Verdict: 4 years jail minus
3 bulan; detention period and IDR200,000,000.00 fine – if
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa EDA MAKMUR unpaid, an extra 2 months in detention;
berhubungan dengan pengelolaan dana
PNBP terkait pungutan tarif pengurusan
dokumen keimigrasian di KJRI Johor Bahru
yang terjadi pada tahun 2001-2002; Putusan:
pidana penjara 2 tahun dikurangi masa
tahanan, denda Rp50.000.000,00 subsidair
3 bulan, uang pengganti Rp791.414.000,00
paling lama 1 bulan setelah inkracht, uang
pengganti tidak dibayar dipidana dengan
pidana penjara 1 tahun;
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa UNTUNG
SASTRA WIJAYA berhubungan dengan
sehubungan dengan pengadaan segel
sampul surat suara Pemilu Tahun 2004;
Putusan: pidana penjara 5 tahun penjara,
denda Rp250.000.000,00 subsidair 3 bulan,
uang pengganti Rp 3.540.968.027,16 apabila
tidak membayar dalam waktu 1 bulan setelah
putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap dan
terdakwa tidak mempunyai harta benda
yang mencukupi untuk membayar uang
pengganti tersebut maka terdakwa dipidana
penjara 5 tahun;
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa DAAN DIMARA
berhubungan dengan pengadaan segel
sampul surat suara Pemilu tahun 2004;
Putusan: pidana penjara 4 tahun dikurangi
masa tahanan dan denda Rp200.000.000,00
apabila tidak dibayar diganti dengan pidana
kurungan 2 bulan;

Penindakan
Repression
t Perkara atas nama FTK HAREFA alias t '5, )"3&'" BLB 5+&+&1 )"3&'"T case: in
TJEJEP HAREFA berhubungan dengan relation to the procurement of books and printing
pengadaan buku dan barang cetak an materials for the general elections of 2004; Verdict
u n t u k kepentingan Pemilu tahun 2004; of Supreme Court: declined leave for cassation/
Putusan MA: Menolak Permohonan Kasasi, appeal, upheld High Court’s Verdict: 6 years jail,
berdasarkan Putusan PT: pidana penjara IDR300,000,000.00 fine (6 months extra in
6 tahun, denda Rp300.000.000,00 subsidair 6 detention if not paid), ordered to pay a
bulan, uang pengganti Rp11.762.908.610,00 compensation of IDR11,762,908,610.00 – if unpaid,
apabila tidak dibayar dipidana penjara 3 an extra 3 years in detention;
tahun; t "/%*/ ) 5"350:0T case: in relation to illicit
t Perk ara atas nama terdakwa ANDIN H requests for / collection of funds by Secretaries to
TARTOYO berhubungan dengan permintaan the Directorates General of the Department of
atau pemungutan dana yang tidak ada Marine Affairs and Fisheries from 2002 until 2006;
peng a t u r a n ny a d a r i p a r a S e k re t a r i s Verdict: 1 year 6 months jail minus detention
D i re k to r a t J e n d e r a l d i L i n g k u n g a n period, IDR50,000,000.00 fine – if unpaid,
Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan Tahun t 5*35" 8*/"5"T case: in relation to the
2002 s.d 2006; Putusan: pidana penjara procurement of laboratory equipment at the
1 tahun 6 bulan dikurangi masa tahanan, Department of Marine Affairs and Fisheries;
denda Rp50.000.000,00 apabila denda tidak Verdict: leave for cassation/appeal declined,
dibayar diganti pidana kurungan 3 bulan; High Court decision upheld, sentenced to 6 years
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa TIRTA WINATA and fined IDR500,000,000.00 (5 months extra
berhubungan dengan pengadaan barang in detention if unpaid), ordered to pay a
dan jasa peralatan laboratorium pada compensation of IDR2,355,222,890.00 – if not paid
Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan; within 1 month, the defendant’s assets to be
Putusan: Menolak permohonan confiscated and auctioned. and defendant to serve
k a s a s i , menguatkan putusan di tingkat another 2 years;
banding, menghukum terdakwa dengan t 8"4,*50 463:0%*#3050T case: in relation to
pidana penjara selama 6 tahun dan denda involvement in or facilitation of corrupt conduct
Rp500.000.000,00 subsidair 5 bulan by SUWARNA AF in the implementation of the
kurungan, uang pengganti 1 - m i l l i o n - h e c t a r e O i l Pa l m P l a n t a t i o n
Rp2.355.222.890,00 apabila dalam 1 bulan Development Program in East Kalimantan,
uang pengganti tidak dibayar har ta followed up by the issuing of logging permits;
bendanya akan disita untuk dilelang dan Verdict: 2.5 years in jail, IDR50,000,000.00 fine (or
dipidana selama 2 tahun; 3 months extra in detention if unpaid).
t Perkara atas nama terdakwa WASKITO
SURYODIBROTO berhubungan dengan
turut serta atau membantu SUWARNA
AF melaksanakan tindak pidana korupsi
pa da pelaksanaan program pembangunan
p er k ebunan kelapa sawit sejuta hektar di
Kalimantan Timur yang diikuti dengan
pener b itan ij in p em anfaatan k ay u ;
Putusan: pidana penjara 2,5 tahun, denda
Rp50.000.000,00 subsidair 3 bulan kurungan.

Penindakan
Repression
Uang Negara yang Diselamatkan 3FDPWFSZPG4UBUF'VOET

Jumlah uang negara yang berhasil diselamatkan The value of the state funds recovered by the KPK, calculated
KPK dihitung berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan based upon the court decisions that have entered into
yang telah memperoleh kekuatan hukum tetap conclusive effect, including decisions on embezzled funds,
(inkracht van gewijsde), yaitu putusan terhadap and the payment of compensation and fines, amounts to
uang rampasan, uang pengganti, dan denda sebesar *%3 from:
Rp 119.976.472.962,00 yang terdiri dari:
t Potential assets seized by the state: *%3
t Potensi barang bukti yang dirampas untuk t Potential compensation payable: *%3
negara senilai Rp22.031.013.912,00 t Potential fines payable: *%3
t Potensi hukuman uang pengganti senilai
Rp91.395.459.050,00
t Potensi hukuman denda sebesar Of the potential state funds that can be recovered,
Rp6.550.000.000,00. IDR45,513,032,038.00 had been lodged with the State
Treasury as per December 18th 2007, composed of:
Dari jumlah potensi uang negara yang berhasil dis-
t Compensation payments (MAP 424114):
elamatkan tersebut di atas, yang telah disetor ke
*%3
Kas Negara per tanggal 18 Desember 2007 adalah
t Corruption proceeds seized by order of the cour t (MAP
sebesar Rp45.513.032.038,00 yang terdiri dari:
424111): *%3 .
t Fines imposed in corruption cases (MAP 423214):
t Pendapatan Uang Pengganti TPK yang
*%3
Ditetapkan Pengadilan (MAP 424114) sebesar
t Court fees in corruption cases (MAP 423215):
Rp34.312.007.190,00
*%3
t Pendapatan Uang Sitaan Hasil Korupsi yang
t Giro Services (MAP 423151): 3Q .
Telah Ditetapkan Pengadilan (MAP 424111)
sebesar Rp8.055.173.827,00.
t Pendapatan Hasil Denda Kasus TPK (MAP
423214) sebesar Rp2.250.000.000,00
t Pendapatan Ongkos Perkara Kasus TPK (MAP
423215) sebesar Rp347.500,00
t Jasa Giro (MAP 423151) sebesar Rp895.503.521,00.

Pencegahan
Prevention
Pencegahan
Prevention
Sinergi antara upaya represif dan preventif
“
merupakan h a l y a n g m u t l a k j i k a i n g i n
m e m b e r a n t a s korupsi hingga tuntas.
Synergy between the repressive and preventive
approaches is an absolute must if corruption in
“
Indonesia is to be eradicated.
S e j a r a h m e m b u k t i k a n b a hw a History has proven that a corruption

pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia eradication effort in Indonesia that
yang hanya mengedepankan c ara- focuses only on repressive methods will
c ara rep res if t id ak l ah s ang g u p not be sufficient to eradicate corruption
m engenyah k an k o ru ps i s am pai right down to its roots. Functioning
k e ak ar-ak ar ny a. D ibu t u hk an juga preventive steps are also required so that
langkah preventif yang berfungsi the reemergence of corruption in the
untuk mencegah tumbuhnya kembali future can be avoided. Thus, synergy
korupsi dan perilaku koruptif di masa between the repressive and preventive
mendatang. Sinergi antara upaya approaches is an absolute must if
represif dan preventif merupakan hal corruption in Indonesia is to be
yang mutlak jika ingin memberantas eradicated.
korupsi hingga tuntas.
Accordingly, besides eradicating corruption
Selain memberantas korupsi dengan using repressive methods, the KPK is also
cara represif, KPK juga diamanatkan mandated by law to take substantive
o leh Undang - u nd ang u nt u k p r e v e n t i v e m e a s u r e s . T h e K P K ’s
melakukan langkah preventif. Langkah preventive approaches include the
KPK dalam m e njal ank an f u ng s i recording and evaluation of LHKPN
p re ve n t i f m e l i p u t i : p e n d a f t a r a n (Public Servant’s Wealth Repor ts),
dan p em er ik saan LHKPN, gratifikasi, discouraging the acceptance of gratuities,
pendidikan dan pelayanan masyarak at, conducting research into preventive
penelitian dan pengembangan, measures, monitoring public and State
monitor, dan pengembangan jaringan institutions, and developing anti-
kerja sama. corruption networks both nationally and
internationally.
Pendaftaran dan Pemeriksaan Recording and Evaluation of Public

LHKPN Servant’s Wealth Reports (LHKPN)
Menurut pasal 5 angk a 2 dan 3 Each public official is obliged to report
UU Nomor 28 Tahun 1999, setiap and announce his/her wealth before,
Penyelenggara Negara (PN) wajib during, and after his tenure in office, as
melaporkan dan mengumumkan per Article 5 (2) and (3) of Law No. 28 of
harta kekayaannya sebelum, selama, 1999. The KPK’s work in this regard
dan sesudah menjabat. Pengelolaan includes:
LHKPN yang dilakukan KPK terdiri
dari:

Pencegahan
Prevention
1. Upaya Peningkatan Kepatuhan 1. Improving Compliance

Posisi tingkat kepatuhan dari jumlah Wajib Lapor The compliance level of public officials who are
seluruhnya 86.468 telah menyampaikan LHKPN required to report (wajib lapor) is as follows: those
sebanyak 76.455 (88,42%) terdiri dari: Eksekutif who are obliged to report number 86,468 public
85,25%, Legislatif 95,59% , Yudikatif 90,57%, dan officials, 76,455 (88.42%) of which have submitted
BUMN/D 91,92%. Tingkat kepatuhan ini meningkat their reports. This group is composed of: executive
sebesar 32,31% dari tahun sebelumnya (2006) officials (85.25%), legislative officials (95.59%), legal
yang mencapai 56,11%. Berbagai kegiatan yang officials (90.57%), and State/Regional Owned
dilakukan dalam upaya peningkatan kepatuhan Enterprise (BUMN) officials (91.92%). This compliance
adalah sebagai berikut: level represents an increase 32.31% in compliance from
t Bimbingan Teknis Pengisian LHKPN telah 2006, which saw a total compliance level of 56.11%.
dilakukan sebanyak 120 kali dengan jumlah The various activities undertaken in order to improve
peserta sejumlah 10.526 orang, yakni 112 the compliance of public officials are as follows:
k ali dilakuk an di instansi dan 8 k ali yang t Technical Guidance on the Filling in of LHKPN
dilakuk an secara reguler di Kantor KPK. Forms, which was conducted 120 times for a
t Sosialisasi LHKPN di 11 instansi yudikatif (Polri, total of 10,526 participants, during 112 events
Pengadilan, dan Kejaksaan) di Provinsi DKI in various institutions, and 8 events at the KPK
Jakarta, Jawa Barat, Jawa Tengah, DI Yogyakarta, Office, with 356 participants per event.
da n J awa Timur dengan j um lah pe s e r t a t Socialization Road Shows and LHKPN Technical
k eseluruhan seb anyak 3.178 o ra ng. Guidance at 11 legal institutions (the Police, the
t Pemanggilan 126 pejabat Eselon I dan setingkat Courts, and the AGO) in Jakarta, West Java,
Eselon I untuk diminta melaporkan dan/atau Central Java, Jogjakarta, and East Java
dilakukan bimbingan teknis pengisian LHKPN. provinces, with a total of 3,178 participants.
t Untuk menunjang kelancaran pelaporan t Requests for 126 officials of Echelon I and
LHKPN, selama tahun 2007 telah didistribusikan equivalent to Echelon I to fill out their LHKPN
formulir LHKPN baik A maupun B sebanyak forms and/or the provision of technical guidance
61.320 form dan distribusi Compact Disc (CD) for these officials for filling out their LHKPN forms.
LHKPN sebanyak 11.889. t In order to support the efficiency of LHKPN
reporting, in 2007 the KPK distributed 61,320 copies
2. Pengelolaan LHKPN of LHKPN forms A and B, as well as 11,889 LHKPN
t Untuk menyelesaikan beban pekerjaan compact discs (CDs).
pengelolaan LHKPN yang tertunda (backlog),
dilakukan penambahan tenaga SDM melalui 2. LHKPN Forms, and their Publicization
rekruitmen tenaga kontrak. t Increased manpower through the recruitment of
t Dalam rangka digitalisasi dokumen LHKPN, contractors to finish the backlog of unprocessed
telah dilakukan pemindaian berkas dari LHKPN.
tahun 2006 sampai dengan tahun 2007 t In the course of digitizing LHKPN documents,
sebanyak 48.200, terdiri dari tahun 2006 48,200 files from 2006 (18,809 files) to 2007 (29,391
sebanyak 18.809 dan di tahun 2007 sebanyak files) have been scanned. There are 13,036 files that
29.391. Sisa dokumen yang belum dipindai saat are as yet unscanned.
ini sebanyak 13.036.
t Validasi dan pemutakhiran pada database t Validation/updating of the database on those who
Wajib Lapor untuk meningkatkan ketersediaan are obliged to report in order to improve the
informasi LHKPN yang andal dan terkini. availability of reliable and updated LHKPN
t Menggunakan jasa outsource pada sebagian information.
pekerjaan untuk meningkatkan efektivitas t Outsourcing some of the workload of the LHKPN
dan efisiensi pengelolaan LHKPN. Directorate in order to comply with Government

Pencegahan
Prevention
3. Kerja sama / Dukungan Pimpinan Instansi regulation No. 63 of 2005 on increasing the
effectiveness and efficiency of LHKPN processing.
Sebagai bentuk apresiasi kepada instansi yang
telah melakukan upaya-upaya peningkatan ke-
3. Cooperation with/Support for Institution/Agency
patuhan pelaporan kekayaan PN di lingkungan
Managers/Leaders
instansinya, KPK memberikan LHKPN Award.
Instansi yang mendapatkan LHKPN Award
As an expression of appreciation for those institutions
2007 untuk pengelolaan LHKPN terbaik adalah:
that have made efforts to increase the compliance
(a) Badan Pusat Statistik; (b) Depar temen
of their officials, the KPK presents them with LHKPN
Perhubungan; dan (c) Badan Pengawasan
awards. In 2007, the institutions that received LHKPN
Keuangan dan Pembangunan. Penilaian
awards for the best LHKPN management were: (a)
award ditentukan banyak variabel, di antaranya:
Central Bureau of Statistics; (b) Department of
tingkat kepatuhan, jumlah LHKPN yang telah
Communications; and (c) the BPKP (Development and
disampaik an ke KPK oleh PN dari instansi
Financial Audit Board). The giving of an award is based
yang bersangkutan pada 2007.
on a number of variables, including: compliance
levels, and the number of LHKPN reports delivered to
Dengan diluncurkannya aplikasi wajib lapor
the KPK by public officials from the relevant institutions
LHKPN, maka telah dilakukan bimbingan teknis
in 2007.
untuk pemahaman penggunaan aplikasi kepada
para koordinator LHKPN di 50 instansi pusat.
With the launch of an LHKPN computer application,
the KPK has provided technical guidance on how to
4. Transparansi kepada Publik
use the application to LHKPN coordinators at 50 cen-
t Pengumuman LHKPN selama tahun 2007 tral government institutions.
telah mencapai 7.427 PN dari target sebesar
4.200 PN melalui Tambahan Berita Negara. 4. Transparency to the Public
t Dalam tahun 2007 telah dilakukan beberapa
t The LHKPN reports that were published during 2007
pengumuman LHKPN Menteri dan Pejabat
cover 7,427 public officials, an increase from the
Negara, yakni atas nama Sri Mulyani Indrawati
targeted 4,200 officials.
(Menteri Keuangan), Fahmi Idris (Menteri
Perindustrian), Hidayat Nur Wahid (Ketua MPR),
t In 2007 the LHKPN reports of a number of ministers
Sofyan A. Djalil (Menteri BUMN), Saifullah
and State officials were published: First, on June
Yusuf (Mantan Menteri Pembangunan Daerah
8th, 2007, the KPK published Finance Minister Sri
Tertinggal), Suryadharma Ali (Menteri Koperasi
Mulyani Indrawati’s and Industry Minister Fahmi
dan UKM), dan Jusman Syafii Djamal (Menteri
Idris’s LHKPNs. Second, on August 29th, 2007, the
Perhubungan).
KPK made public People’s Consultative Assembly
t Pemenuhan permintaan data LHKPN yang
Speaker Hidayat Nur Wahid’s LHKPN, BUMN (State
sudah diumumkan kepada media dan
Owned Enterprises) Minister Sofyan A. Djalil’s LHKPN,
masyarakat sebanyak 2.693 LHKPN yang
and former Disadvantaged Regions Development
sudah di-TBN-kan.
M i n i s t e r S a i f u l l a h Yu s u f ’s LHKPN. Lastly, o n
Pencegahan
Prevention
5. Efektivitas Pemeriksaan LHKPN November 7th, 2007, the KPK published

Cooperatives and Small and Medium Enterprise
t Dari analisis data internal sebanyak 211 LHKPN
Minister Jusman Syafii Djamal’s LHKPN.
(target 294), ditindaklanjuti ke pemeriksaan
t The number of requests for LHKPN data that were
substantif sebanyak 103 LHKPN (target 92),
announced in the media and to the general public
dan ke pemeriksaan khusus sebanyak 8 (target
amount and which were subsequently complied
8). Pemeriksaan yang dilakukan sebagai tindak
with amount to 2,693, which have since been
lanjut dari informasi dari Direktorat Pengaduan
published in the Supplement to the State Gazette.
Masyarakat sebanyak 36 (target 20).
t Pemeriksaan substantif sebanyak 103 LHKPN
5. Effectiveness of LHKPN Report Evaluation
di atas dilakukan terhadap PN bidang
eksekutif 55 PN, yudikatif 8 PN, legislatif 7 PN t Based on an analysis of internal data involving
dan BUMN/D 33 PN. about 211 LHKPN reports (out of the targeted 294
t Pemenuhan dukungan data dan informasi reports), 103 reports (target of 92) were subjected
terkait LHKPN kepada direktorat lain untuk to substantive evaluation; and 8 reports (target of
kepentingan penyelidikan, pemeriksaan 8) to special evaluation. Such evaluations were carried
pengaduan masyarakat maupun pemeriksaan out in order to follow up on information from the
gratifikasi sebanyak 16 kali. Directorate of Public Complaints concerning 36
t Da r i hasil p em er ik saan k husus, y ang complaints (target of 20).
ditindaklanjuti oleh Bidang Penindakan r 5IF -),1/ SFQPSUT UIBU XFSF TVCTUBOUJWFMZ
sebanyak 2 PN. evaluated concerned 55 executive officials, 8 judicial/
law enforcement officials, 7 legislative officials, and 33
state/local-government enterprise officials.
t LHKPN-related data and information was provided
to other directorates on 16 occasions for investigative
purposes in connection with public complaints and
the acceptance of gratuities
t The results of special evaluations were followed up
on by the Deputy for Repression in the cases of 2
public officials.
Jumlah Wajib Lapor dan PN yang Menyampaikan Laporan LHKPN

(Number of Mandatory Reporters and State Administrators who have Submitted LHKPN)
76,455
2007 86,468
65,448
116,649
2006
56,274
113,826
2005
43,668
88,823
2004
- 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000 120.000

Jumlah wajib lapor LHKPN
Laporan LHKPN yang disampaikan
Pencegahan
Prevention
Tingkat Kepatuhan Penyampaian LHKPN Tahun 2007
120%
96% 97% 95%
100% 92%
91% 83%
85%
80% 75%
60%
40%
20%
0%
% Kepatuhan % Diumumkan
Eksekutif Legislatif Yudikatif BUM/D
Penanganan Gratifikasi Gratuities

Secara umum, tugas dan kewenangan KPK terkait Generally, the KPK’s duties and powers in relation to
dengan gratifikasi menurut UU Nomor 23 Tahun gratuities, based on Law No. 23 of 2002, is to conduct:
2002 adalah melakukan:
r "OBMZTJT PG SFQPSUT PS DPNQMBJOUT GSPN UIF QVCMJD
t penelitian laporan atau pengaduan from NGOs, and from government institutions on
masyarakat, lembaga swadaya masyarakat, suspicions that a gratuity has been received by a
atau instansi pemerintah tentang dugaan public or state official;
penerimaan gratifikasi dan sejenisnya kepada r %FUFSNJOJOH UIF SFDFJQU PG B HSBUVJUZ PS TJNJMBS
PN atau Pegawai Negeri; emolument by a public or state official;
t identifikasi penerimaan gratifikasi dan sejenisnya r 4FBSDIJOHGPSFWJEFODFJOSFMBUJPOUPQVCMJDPSTUBUF
oleh PN atau Pegawai Negeri; officials suspected of receiving gratuities or similar
t pencarian bukti-bukti untuk penyelidikan PN emoluments;
atau Pegawai Negeri yang diduga menerima r &WBMVBUJPOTPGHSBUVJUZSFQPSUTPSSFQPSUTPGTJNJMBS
gratifikasi dan sejenisnya; emoluments;
t pemeriksaan terhadap laporan penerimaan r %FMJWFSZ PG HSBUVJUJFT FTUBCMJTIFE UP CFMPOH UP UIF
gratifikasi dan sejenisnya; dan State to the Ministry of Finance.
t penyerahan gratifikasi yang menjadi milik negara
kepada Menteri Keuangan. The various gratuity-related activities conducted by
the KPK during 2007 included socialization and
Beberapa kegiatan terkait gratifikasi yang telah informal discussions, the processing of reports and the
dilakukan KPK selama periode 2007 antara lain conducting of evaluations on gratuities.
meliputi sosialisasi dan penyuluhan, penanganan
laporan, serta pemeriksaan gratifikasi. 1. Socialization and Discussions
In 2007, socialization and informal discussions
1. Sosialisasi dan Penyuluhan Gratifikasi
activities were provided for government and private
Selama tahun 2007 kegiatan sosialisasi dan institutions, such as the Directorate General of Tariffs
penyuluhan gratifikasi diberikan kepada instansi- and Import Duties, state/local government-owned

Pencegahan
Prevention
instansi pemerintah maupun swasta seperti enterprises, universities, provincial governments,

Ditjen Bea dan Cukai, BUMN/BUMD, Perguruan the Department of Foreign Affairs, and the BKN,
Tinggi, Pemprov, Departemen Luar Negeri, with a total of 54 activities being undertaken. The
dan Perwakilan Badan Kepegawaian Nasional KPK has also being cultivating cooperation with
dengan jumlah 54 kegiatan. Sejak 2005, KPK Indonesia Business Link since 2005, in order to
juga menjalin kerja sama dengan Indonesia conduct socialization in a number of regional IBL
Business Link (IBL) untuk menyelenggarakan branches focused on the implementation of
kegiatan sosialisasi di beberapa IBL daerah gratuity rules in day-to-day business.
yang difokuskan kepada penerapan aturan
gratifikasi dalam kegiatan bisnis sehari-hari. 2. Gratuity Reports
Every public official is obligated to report the receipt of
a gratuity to the KPK at the most 30 days after that
official received that gratuity, according to articles 17,
18, and 19 of Law No. 30 of 2002. The KPK provides
standard gratuity report forms.
In 2007, the Directorate of Gratuities was still in the

process of clarifying and verifying 2006 gratuity
reports involving some IDR2,545,372,000.00 in cash
and IDR181,120,000.00-worth of goods.
In 2007, the KPK received 306 gratuity reports,

involving, in monetary terms, IDR6,872,903,035.00;
USD26,990.00; SGD2,710.00; AUD400; EUR100.00;
RM350.00; and goods worth IDR57,480,000.00. These
2. Laporan Gratifikasi
amounts showed an increase compared to 2006,
Setiap PN wajib melapork an kepada KPK when cash gratuities worth IDR3,951,494,341.00
selambat-lambatnya 30 hari kerja sejak yang were recorded, and IDR548,977,250.00 worth
bersangkutan menerima gratifikasi tersebut of goods, In 2005, the equivalent figures were
sesuai dengan pasal 17, 18 dan 19 UU Nomor IDR215,315,000.00 and IDR504,248,000.00, and in
30 tahun 2002. Dalam hal ini KPK menyediakan 2004, IDR20,000,000.00 in cash gratuities.
formulir gratifikasi untuk digunakan para pelapor.
Dalam tahun 2007 terdapat luncuran laporan
gratifikasi tahun 2006 yang masih dalam proses
klarifikasi dan verifik asi yang berbentuk
ua ng sebesar Rp2.545.372.000,00 dan berbentuk
barang sebesar Rp181.120.000,00.
Selama tahun 2007, KPK telah menerima laporan
gratifikasi sebanyak 306 laporan dengan nominal
sebesar Rp6.872.903.035,00, USD26,990.00,
SGD2,710.00, AUD400.00, EUR100.00,
RM350.00 dan dalam bentuk barang se -
nilai Rp57.480.000,00. Jumlah ini menin-
gkat dibandingkan dengan tahun 2006 sebesar
Rp3.951.494.341,00 (uang) dan Rp548.977.250,00
(barang), tahun 2005 sebesar Rp215.315.000,00
(uang) dan Rp504.248.000,00 (barang), dan ta-
hun 2004 sebesar Rp20.000.000,00 dalam bentuk
uang.

Pencegahan
Prevention
Dari jumlah yang dilaporkan selama tahun 2007, From t h e re p or t s re ce i ve d i n 2 0 0 7 , the

Pimpinan KPK menetapkan Rp2.114.771.834,00, K P K Commissioners have established that
USD3,030.00, SGD840.00, dan barang senilai IDR2,114,771,834.00; USD3,030.00; SGD840.00; and
R p8.175.000,00 menjadi milik negara. IDR8,175,000.00 of items are to be returned to the State
Penyetoran ke Kas Negara selama tahun 2007 as State Property. Such gratuities paid into the State
sebesar Rp2.842.150.894,00 yang berasal dari Treasury in 2007 amounted to IDR2,842,150,894.00,
pelaporan tahun 2006 dan tahun 2007. Sisa based on 2006 and 2007 reports. The rest, valued at
sebesar Rp4.650.008.701,00, USD20,960.00, IDR4,650,008,701.00; USD20,960.00; SGD1,670.00;
SGD1,670.00, AUD400.00, EUR100.00 dan barang AUD400.00; EUR100.00; and non-cash gratuities
dengan nilai Rp49.305.000,00 ditetapkan seba- valued at IDR49,305,000.00 were established to be the
gai milik penerima, karena gratifikasi tersebut property of the receivers, as the gratuities were not
dinilai tidak terkait dengan jabatannya dan tidak related to the officials’ positions, or run contrary to his/
berlawanan dengan kewajiban atau tugasnya, her obligations and duties. These permissible
seperti hibah dan warisan dari anggota k e l u arg a gratuities are most commonly family gifts/
a t a u p ener im aan saat pesta pernikahan bequests/inheritances, or income received
atau ulang tahun anggota keluarga. Gratifikasi in the form of donations at wedding ceremonies
sebesar Rp2.140.044.500,00, USD3,000.00, and birthday parties of relatives. Gratuities valued at
SGD200.00, dan RM350.00 masih dalam proses IDR2,140,044,500.00; SGD200.00, and RM350.00 have
penelitian sehingga belum ditetapk an not been established either way and are still being
statusnya. assessed.
Rekapitulasi Penerimaan Laporan Gratifikasi

Periode 2004-2007
326
350 306
300
Jumlah Laporan
250
200
150
50
100
1
50
-
2004 2005 2006 2007

Pencegahan
Prevention
Rekapitulasi Penerimaan Laporan Gratifikasi

Periode 2004-2007
8,000
7,000
6.359
Jumlah Uang (Rp. Jutaan)
6,000
4,500
5,000
4.399
4,000
2,726
3,000 2.842
2.459
2,000
720 1,001
1,000 641
200
20 773
0
78
2004 2005 2006 2007*
-1,000
Yang Dilaporkan Milik Negara Milik Penerima Dalam proses
Rekapitulasi Penerimaan Gratifikasi yang Disetor ke Kas Negara

Menurut Instansi Tahun 2004-2007
Milik Negara
No Instansi Total
2004 2005 2006 2007*
1 DPR – RI - - 30.470.000 11.800.000 42.270.000
2 MA / Pengadilan - - 15.000.000 - 15.000.000
3 BPK - - - 114.012.850 114.012.850
4 Kementerian - - - 298.236.709 298.236.709
5 Depar temen - - - 240.487.000 240.487.000
6 Pem. Provinsi - - 61.207.600 65.750.000 126.957.600
7 Pem. Kab. / Kota - 15.000.000 23.000.000 593.933.620 631.933.620
8 DPRD - - 29.500.000 799.189.670 828.689.670
9 BUMN - - 30.000.000 45.500.000 75.500.000
10 BUMD - - - - 0
11 LPND - - 3.050.000 35.587.500 38.637.500
12 Polri - - - 611.575.000 611.575.000
13 Internal KPK - 340.000 25.265.910 26.178.545 51.784.455
Jumlah 0 15.340.000 217.493.510 2.842.150.894 3.074.984.404
*) per 17 Desember 2007

Pencegahan
Prevention
3. Parsel 3. Parcels
Gratifikasi sangat terkait dengan kebiasaan- The receipt of gratuities is closely related to the
kebiasaan yang dilakukan oleh PN maupun habits of public and state officials who , through
Pegawai Negeri yang selama ini dianggap the years have been accepted as normal. However,
lazim. Namun, sejak dikeluarkannya aturan since the advent of the new gratuity rules, these
mengenai gratifikasi, hal-hal tersebut menjadi previously acceptable habits have come to be
bagian gratifikasi yang merupakan salah satu recognized as part of how corruption operates in
delik korupsi. Indonesia.
Salah satu kebiasaan tersebut adalah pemberian One such oractice is the giving of gifts to public
hadiah kepada PN menjelang perayaan hari-hari officials on the eve of major religious holidays,
besar keagamaan, yang dikenal sebagai known as the giving of parcels. Since 2004,
pemberian parsel. Sejak tahun 2004, secara the KPK has consistently released public
konsisten setiap tahun, KPK mengeluarkan announcements to discourage the giving of gifts
imbauan kepada masyarakat untuk tidak to public officials; this is accompanied by the
memberikan parsel kepada para pejabat negara, publicizing of the prohibition on public officials
dan juga larangan kepada PN maupun pegawai receiving parcels and similar gifts related to their
negeri untuk tidak menerima pemberian parsel official positions, or which would be contrary to
dan sejenisnya yang terkait dengan jabatan atau their duties and obligations.
berlawanan dengan tugas atau kewajibannya.
In 2007, the KPK has also socialized this among
Khusus untuk tahun 2007, KPK juga directors of state-owned enterprises.
menyosialisasikan imbauan ini kepada Direksi
BUMN. Further, the KPK has also conducted supervision
on the effectiveness of its ban on public officials
Di samping itu, KPK juga melakukan kegiatan receiving parcels. From the results supervision
pemantauan terhadap efektivitas larangan conducted over the Idul Firti holiday, empirical
penerimaan parsel bagi pejabat dan PN. Dari evidence suggests that there has been a
hasil pemantauan yang dilakuk an setelah significant increase in reporting, as well as in the
lebaran, didapat fakta adanya peningk atan level of compliance in the reports themselves.
pelaporan yang sangat signifikan, termasuk
tingkat kepatuhan dalam pelaporan PN. 4. Gratuity Evaluation
4. Pemeriksaan Gratifikasi In 2007, evaluations on reports and other

sources of information involving 33 cases were
Selama 2007 telah dilakukan pemeriksaan atas
conducted, with the details being as follows: (a)
pengaduan dan informasi lainnya sebanyak 33
Cases originating from public complaints: 17;
kasus dengan rincian: (a) 17 kasus berasal dari
(b) Cases originating from LHKPN reports that
pengaduan masyarakat; (b) 12 kasus berasal
involve bequests/inheritances: 12; and (c)
dari LHKPN yang mengandung unsur hibah;
Other sources of information: 4 cases. Of these
dan (c) 4 kasus lainnya. Dari 33 kasus tersebut,
33 cases, 5 cases have been forwarded to the
5 kasus diteruskan ke Direktorat Penyelidikan KPK.
KPK Directorate of Preliminary Investigation.

Pencegahan
Prevention
Pendidikan dan Pelayanan Masyarakat Education and Public Services

1. Pendidikan Anti Korupsi 1. Anti-Corruption Education
Menciptakan Generasi Baru yang Anti Koru- The creation of a new generation imbued with an
psi merupak an sasaran antara KPK dalam anti-corruption ethos is one of the major goals of
membantu mewujudkan Visi KPK “Menciptakan the Directorate of Education and Public Services in
Indonesia yang bebas dari korupsi”. Salah satu supporting the KPK’s vision of “Realizing a Corruption-
langkah konkrit yang dilaksanakan adalah dengan Free Indonesia”. One concrete step in achieving this
melaksanakan program Pendidikan Anti Korupsi vision is the provision of anti-corruption education
untuk Pelajar dan Mahasiswa. programs for students at all levels.
Sampai dengan akhir 2007, telah dilaksanakan 28 As per the 4th quarter of 2007, the KPK had carried
kali program Train of Trainers (TOT) yang diikuti out Training of Trainers 28 times; such programs
oleh para mahasiswa seluruh Indonesia dari 37 were attended by students from 37 Universities
universitas. MoU (Nota Kesepahaman) yang telah across Indonesia. Also, 67 Memorandums of
ditandatangani antara KPK dengan 67 Perguruan Understanding between the KPK and public and
Tinggi Negeri atau Swasta di seluruh Indonesia, private universities across Indonesia were signed
yang bertujuan melaksanakan pendidikan, for the purpose of implementing anti-corruption
kampanye dan riset Anti Korupsi. education, campaign, and research.
The follow-up to the Training of Trainers program was
Tindak lanjut dari TOT adalah dilaksanakannya
the provision of anti-corruption education at the high
Pendidikan Anti Korupsi untuk tingkat SMA
school level in cooperation with university students
dengan fasilitator yang diambil dari para
who had participated in the Training of Trainers
mahasiswa hasil TOT. Kegiatan Pendidikan Anti
program. Anti-corruption education for high school
Korupsi untuk SMP dan SMA telah dilaksanakan
students was provided in Aceh, Jakarta, Subang,
di beberapa kota dan kabupaten yaitu Nanggroe
Pangkal Pinang (Bangka Belitung), Manado, Padang,
Aceh Darussalam (NAD), Jakarta, Bandung
Bukit Tinggi, Banjarmasin, Palembang, Garut,
dan Subang, Pangkal Pinang (Bangka Belitung,
Surabaya, and other parts of the country.
Manado, Padang, Bukit Tinggi, Banjarmasin,
Palembang, Garut, Surabaya, dan kota lainnya di Education materials at high school levels are on:
seluruh Indonesia. Introducing Corruption, the Impact of Corrup-
tion, Efforts to Fight Corruption, Honesty Shop (a
Materi pendidikan untuk tingkat SMA dan SMP
shop where students purchase items and snacks
terdiri dari Pengenalan Korupsi, Dampak Korupsi,
with no supervision; at the end of a certain time the
Upaya Perlawanan Terhadap Korupsi, Warung
proceeds of the shop is matched with its inventory
Kejujuran dan pemilihan pelajar Panutan/Unggul.
for further discussion), as well as selecting a Model
Student.

Pencegahan
Prevention
Materi untuk kelas 4, 5 dan 6 SD disisipkan Materials for primary school students (years 4, 5 and
kedalam beberapa mata ajaran diantaranya 6) are included in standard subjects such as Religion,
pelajaran Agama, Bahasa Indonesia, Matematika, Bahasa Indonesia, Mathematics, Science, Social
IPA/IPS dan Kesenian dan Budaya. Materi Anti Studies and Art and Culture. Materials for primary
Korupsi untuk siswa SD terdiri dari 7 nilai : school students focus on the following 7 essential
Kejujuran, Keberanian, Tanggungjawab, values: Honesty, Courage, Responsibility, Modesty,
Kesederhanaan, Kepedulian, Daya Juang dan Awareness, Fighting Spirit, and Justice.
Keadilan.
The KPK has also prepared anti-corruption character-
Dalam pengembangan modul pendidikan, telah building education programs for elementary school
dibuat 3 modul untuk siswa SMP dan telah siap students,and modules have been designed for
untuk dipublikasikan pada tahun 2008. Selain itu elementary school grades 4, 5 and 6.
juga, untuk pendidikan pengembangan karakter
anti korupsi bagi SD, telah dibuat modul Anti-corruption fairy tales have also been designed
pendidikan untuk siswa kelas 4, 5, dan 6. for pre-school (kindergarten) students. Education
activities using the fairy-tale (dongeng) approach will
Khusus untuk pendidikan pengembangan siswa be implemented in 2008. These will involve simplified
Taman Kanak-kanak ( TK) telah dibuat buku anti-corruption characters, including mascot animals.
dongeng anti korupsi yang berisi pesan moral The stories are designed to instill the following values
yang memadukan cerita sederhana dengan in children: Honesty, Courage, Justice, Modesty,
tokoh dan k arakter hewan-hewan lucu. Fighting Spirit, Responsibility and Awareness.
Implementasi kegiatan pendidikan dengan
pendekatan dongeng akan dilaksanakan Education will also target the public and private
pada tahun 2008. spheres, especially civil servants and public officials.
Workshops for members of regional parliaments
Program Pendidikan Anti Korupsi tidak hanya (DPRD) have been held to increase the capacity of the
menyentuh pelajar dan mahasiswa saja, akan members’ roles and functions. In 2007, such workshops
tetapi dikembangkan pula untuk Sektor Swasta, were held in East Java, Gorontalo, West Sumatra, South
Pe g a w a i N e g e r i S i p i l ( P N S ) , d a n p a r a Kalimantan, and North Sulawesi.
Pe n y elenggara Negara (PN). Salah satunya
adalah program pemberdayaan Dewan A local parliament as an institution has two important
Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) yang bertiujuan roles – its role as the administrator of local governance,
untuk meningkatkan kapsasitas peran dan fungsi and its role as the representative of the local people.
DPRD. Selama tahun 2007 workshop peningkatan These two roles involve three functions: legislative,
kapasitas peran dan fungsi DPRD telah dilakukan budgeting, and monitoring. With these roles and
di Provinisi; Jawa Timur, Gorontalo, Sumatera functions, a local parliament enjoys a very strategic
Barat, Kalimantan Selatan, dan Sulawesi Utara. position in the effort to improve public welfare.
DPRD memiliki dua peran yang amat penting, With these KPK-facilitated workshops, it is hoped
yaitu sebagai unsur penyelenggara pemerintahan that the DPRD members’ understanding of corrupt
daerah dan sebagai wakil rakyat. Kedua peran conduct will be widened, and thus the DPRDs will
DPRD tersebut diwujudkan dalam dalam tiga be able to play a more proactive role in preventing
fungsi, yaitu legislasi, anggaran dan pengawasan. corruption.
Dengan peran dan fungsi tersebut DPRD
menempati posisi yang sangat strategis dalam
mewujudkan kesejahteraan rakyat.

Pencegahan
Prevention
Dengan Workshop yang difasilitasi oleh KPK

itu, diharapkan pemahaman anggora Dewan
terhadap tindak pidana korupsi akan semakin
luas sehingga kedepannya diharapkan DPRD
dapat berperan lebih aktif lagi dalam mencegah
perbuatan korupsi sesuai dengan UU yang ada
saat ini.
2. Kampanye dan Sosialisasi

Kalender kegiatan 2007 merupakan salah satu
yang terpadat selama periode empat tahun
yang pertama sejak berdirinya KPK. Dimulai
dengan proses pengadaan perangkat sosialisasi 2. Campaigning and Socialization
sebagai bahan kampanye yang terdiri dari 15
macam jenis seperti stiker, brosur, buku saku, pin, The 2007 activity calendar was the busiest compared
buku dongeng dan komik serta pembuatan video to other years as the KPK was first established only
instruksional pelaporan gratifikasi dan pengisian four years ago. Activities included the procurement
laporan harta kekayaan penyelenggara negara of campaign material, including 15 different types of
(LHKPN) serta Tatacara Pengaduan Masyarakat. items: stickers, brochures, pocket books, pins, fairytale
Seluruh materi ini didistribusik an dalam books and comics, and the production of instructional
berbagai kegiatan yang diselenggarakan sendiri videos on gratuities and the filling in of LHKPN forms.
oleh KPK maupun atas permintaan masyarakat These materials are distributed during various
dan kegiatan lain yang didukung oleh KPK secara activities conducted by the KPK, at the request of the
cuma-cuma. public, or during other activities that are supported by
Materi yang bentuk dan jenisnya disesuaikan the KPK, all free of charge.
dengan berbagai kalangan termasuk anak-
a na k , pelajar, mahasiswa dan u m u m , Materials take account of the demographics of the
didesain sedemikian rupa sehingga menarik target group (children, students, university
dan merangsang minat untuk memilikinya dan students, the general public), and are designed so
membacanya. as to stimulate the interest of the reader.
Selain itu, untuk menggalang peran serta Further, In order to rally greater public support for
masyarakat yang lebih besar dalam perlawanan the fight against corruption, various activities
terhadap korupsi, telah dilaksanakan beberapa involving the public directly have also been
kegiatan yang melibatkan masyarakat secara conducted in major cities around Indonesia, including
langsung. Kegiatan yang berlangsung di the holding of exhibitions, discussions, debates, the
beberapa kota besar di Indonesia, dilaksanakan gathering of suggestions and complaints, and the
dalam bentuk pameran, diskusi dan interaksi, distribution of anti-corruption books and materials.
menerima saran dan pengaduan serta dilengkapi
dengan pembagian buku dan materi sosialisasi In 2007, activities intended to forge a local anti-
anti korupsi. corruption spirit were conducted at strategic venues in
Tahun 2007 kegiatan penggalangan tek ad the cities of Manado, Palembang, Batam, and
budaya anti korupsi telah dilaksanakan di Surabaya, and drew an enthusiastic public
tempat-tempat strategis di Kota Manado, response, with people urging the eradication of
Palembang, Batam, dan Surabaya dan berhasil corruption as quickly as possible.
menyedot antusiasme pub lik d e ng an
memberikan kesempatan masyarakat seluas- Campaigning and socialization programs were
luasnya mengekspresikan pendapatnya tentang also targeted at public officials and the general
perlawanan terhadap korupsi.
Pencegahan
Prevention
Selain itu program kampanye dan sosialisasi public through seminars and workshops on public
ditujuk an pula kepada PNS dan PN ser ta complaints, gratuities, and LHKPN, which were held
masyarakat umum melalui kegiatan Seminar in Medan, Jayapura, Ambon, Manado. Surabaya,
dan Workshop pengaduan masyarakat, gratifikasi Pontianak , Makassar, and Bandung.
dan LHKPN di Medan, Jayapura, Ambon, T h e s e activities help public officials understand
Manado, Surabaya, Pontianak, Makassar dan the corruption eradication effort at a deeper level,
Bandung. Dengan diselenggarakannya kegiatan as a succession of preventive activities followed
ini, para PNS dan PN dapat lebih memahami by repressive activities, suppor ted by public
upaya pemberantasan korupsi yang merupakan participation.
serangkaian upaya pencegahan disertai langkah
penindakan atau represif dan didukung oleh In order to increase the reach of the campaign, the
peran serta masyarakat. KPK has made use of innovative outdoor media
such as bus advertising in Jakarta, and bill boards
Untuk menambah jangkauan kampanye, KPK
in major cities, such as Jakarta, Bandung, Medan,
memanfaatkan media luar ruang seperti Bus Ad
Semarang, Surabaya, and Makassar. Banners and
di Jakarta dan Billboard untuk kampanye anti
posters have also been erected in strategic places
korupsi di kota besar seperti Jakarta, Bandung,
(such as village/sub-district offices).
Medan, Semarang, Surabaya, dan Makassar dan
penempelan spanduk (Banner) dan poster di
All these activities have been supported by the use
tempat-tempat strategis termasuk kantor-
of the print and electronic media, including TV and
kantor kelurahan.
Radio talkshows, so as to ensure that the campaign
activities and the socialization of corruption
prevention and eradication information, as well as
information on the KPK’s activities at the local,
national, and even international levels, is made
available to the general public .
Talkshows and campaign events were carried by

private national TV stations and local TV stations,
such as CTV Banten, Batam TV, Makassar TV, JTV
Surabaya, Sriwijaya TV Palembang, GoTV Gorontalo,
Pasifik TV Menado, Makassar TV, Bali TV, O Channel
Jakarta and other local TV stations around Indonesia.
Seluruh kegiatan ditunjang dengan publikasi
The TV campaign also involved talkshow programs
melalui media cetak dan elektronik, termasuk
using fragmented formats featuring various
program talkshow T V dan Radio, dengan
celebrities in order to attract the interest of the
demikian rangkaian kegiatan Kampanye dan
audience and spread the campaign message; these
Sosialisasi Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan
sort of shows have been broadcast by TVRI as well
Korupsi serta informasi aktivitas KPK di ting-
as local TV stations, such as Bekasi TV and Ratih TV
kat lokal, nasional maupun internasional dapat
Kebumen.
senantiasa diikuti oleh masyarakat.
Kegiatan talkshow dan kampanye melalui media Public service announcements were broadcast by
TV dan Radio telah diselenggarakan dan diliput 11 national private TV stations and airport TV ser-
oleh TV Swasta Nasional dan TV Lokal seperti CTV vices in Jakarta, Medan and Bandung, local TV sta-
Banten, Batam TV, Makassar TV, JTV Surabaya, tions, and more than 200 radio stations associated
Sriwijaya TV Palembang, GoTV Gorontalo, Pasifik with PRSSNI.
TV Menado, Makassar TV, Bali TV, O Channel
Jakarta dan TV local lainnya di Indonesia.

Pencegahan
Prevention
Kampanye melalui TV dilaksanakan juga dalam

program Talkshow dalam format fragment yang
didukung oleh beberapa artis terkenal untuk
menarik minat pemirsa menyimak pesan kam-
panye, dan disiarkan di TVRI serta beberapa TV
lokal seperti Bekasi TV dan Ratih TV Kebumen.
Iklan Layanan Masyarakat ditayangkan pula di

11 TV Swasta Nasional, Airport TV di Jakarta,
Medan dan Bandung dan TV Lokal serta di lebih
dari 200 Radio yang tergabung dalam PRSSNI.
Untuk program Talkshow Radio Regular

For scheduled Radio Talkshow programs, the KPK is
(berjadwal) KPK didukung oleh jaringan
supported by the Radio Trijaya FM network and
Radio Tijaya FM dan Indonesia Business
Indonesia Business Link at Radio Smart FM, as well
Link (IBL) di jaringan Radio Smart FM, disamping
as by programs on the Radio 68H, Radio Ramako
program di jaringan Radio 68H, jaringan
FM, and Radio Suara Surabaya networks.
Radio Ramako FM dan jaringan Radio Suara
Surabaya.
By optimizing the involvement of the mass media,
events, and publications, it is hoped that the KPK’s
Rangkaian kegiatan kampanye tahun 2007
campaign and socialization approach will
diakhiri dengan acara Penggalangan Tekad
successfully support the Indonesian anti-corruption
Budaya Anti Korupsi yang dilaksanakan
effort.
bertepatan dengan hari Anti Korupsi Sedunia
tanggal 9 Desember 2007 di Bundaran
A series of campaign activities in 2007 was capped
H I Jakarta. Diikuti oleh 400 anggota keluarga
with the Rallying Anti-Corruption Culture Event,
besar KPK. Pada kesempatan ini dibagikan
which was held on December 9th 2007, on World
26.700 buah Buku Saku “Pahami Dulu Baru
Anti-corruption Day, at Bundaran HI Jakarta. This
Lawan” , 42.000 buah Sticker “Awas Bahaya
event was attended by 400 KPK personnel. During
Laten Korupsi” dan 12.000 buah Sticker Gratifikasi
this event, 26,700 handbooks on “Understanding
kepada masyarakat luas.
Corruption in Order to Fight It”, 42,000 “Beware Latent
Corruption” stickers, and 12,000 Gratuity stickers were
Pada kesempatan ini beberapa organisasi
distributed to the public.
kemasyarakatan dan Lembaga Swadaya
Masyarakat ikut serta memeriahkan kegiatan,
The KPK was joined by several community and
sebagai wujud peranserta masyarakat dalam
non-governmental organizations in holding this
upaya pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi.
event, reflecting public participation in the course
of socializing corruption prevention.
3. Humas
Humas KPK menekankan pelayanan publik.
Memberikan informasi yang akurat dan tepat.
Sambil berusaha menimbulkan citra positif KPK
di mata masyarakat, diiringi promosi sikap dan
kesadaran antikorupsi.
Melalui humas, KPK menyampaikan dan

menjelaskan kebijakan, upaya pencegahan,
program kerja, dan kewajiban-kewajibannya.
Humas KPK berupaya memberikan penjelasan

Pencegahan
Prevention
kepada masyarakat tentang kebijakan dan tujuan 3. Public Relations
yang akan dicapai KPK dalam melaksanakan
KPK’ Public Relations (PR) emphasizes the provision
program kerjanya. Humas KPK juga berupaya
of public service. It is committed to providing
menanamkan keyakinan dan kepercayaan
accurate and reliable information. Further, it
masyarakat kepada KPK.
attempts to create a positive image of the KPK in
the eyes of the Public, as well as to promote anti-
Dalam rangka itu, humas KPK membina
corruption behaviour and awareness.
hubungan baik dengan media massa dan
stakeholder lainnya, dalam bentuk: (a) pertemuan
Through its public relations, the KPK delivers and
dengan pimpinan redaksi (editor’s meeting); (b)
explains its policies, preventive efforts, work programs,
diskusi rutin dengan media (media discuss); (c)
and obligations to the public. KPK public relations
menyelenggarak an tem u m ed ia (p re ss
attempts to explain to the public the policies and
conference); (d) mengadakan kunjungan media
goals to be made and met by the KPK in the
(media visit); dan (e) pelayanan informasi publik.
implementation of its work programs. KPK PR also
attempts to instill in the public a sense of trust and
Bila dikuantifikasi, selama tahun 2007 telah
confidence in the KPK.
terlaksana sejumlah kegiatan. Kunjungan media
(media visit) ke beberapa media besar baik
Thus, KPK PR is dedicated to cultivating good
cetak dan elektronik sebanyak 20 media di Jakarta
re l a t i on s w i t h t h e ma ss me d i a a n d o ther
dan Surabaya, seperti RCTI, SCTV, TransTV, Kantor
stakeholders through the holding of: (a) Meetings
Berita Antara, Radio Trijaya, Radio Smart FM,
with editors; (b) Routine discussions with the
Kompas, Tempo, The Jakarta Post, Jawa Pos,
media; (c) Press conferences; (d) Conducting media
Indo Pos. Siaran pers sebanyak lebih kurang
visits; and (e) the provision of a public information
30 buah, termasuk konferensi pers u n t u k
service.
ha l-hal yang k rusial dan mem bu t u hk an
pember itaan yang cepat sebanyak 27 kali.
In 2007, KPK PR has been involved in various
Tanggapan dan pelurusan berita di media
activities. Visits to various print and electronic
sebanyak 7 kali. Menjadi narasumber media
media offices were made -- 20 offices in Jakarta and
sebanyak 158 kali. Diskusi dengan media
Surabaya, including RCTI, SCTV, TransTV, Antara
(media discuss), sebagai ajang media dapat
News Agency, Radio Trijaya, Radio Smart FM,
berinteraksi dengan Pimpinan/Pejabat KPK,
Kompas, Tempo, The Jakarta Post, Jawa Pos, and
sebanyak 6 kali.
Indo Pos. Press conferences were conducted about
30 times, including conferences concerning crucial
Namun, tentu saja humas KPK tak berkutat
issues that needed immediate publicizing (27 such
pada pembinaan hubungan baik dengan media.
conferences). Responses and repudiations of media
Media itu pun mesti diberikan pemahaman
reports were made 7 times. KPK PR has acted as a
yang tepat, akurat, dan berimbang mengenai
source for the media 158 times. Discussions with the
KPK dan upaya strategis pemberantasan
media, as a platform for the media to interact with the
korupsi. Untuk itu, humas KPK menyelenggarakan
KPK Commissioners and officials, were conducted 6
lokakarya antikorupsi yang khusus diperuntukkan
times.
bagi jurnalis. Sampai akhir tahun 2007, sudah
dilakukan tiga kali lokakarya. Lokakarya pertama
O f course, KPK PR does not confine itself to
di Jakarta, setelah itu berturut-turut Surabaya dan
cultivating good relations with the media. The media
Yogyakarta.
must be equipped with an accurate, balanced, and
reliable understanding of the KPK, and of the strategic
Kemudian, untuk membina komunikasi internal,
effort involved in combating corruption. Thus, KPK PR
humas KPK menerbitkan majalah internal, yang
conducts anti-corruption seminars specifically
diberi nama WartaKPK. WartaKPK muncul mulai
targeted at journalists. As per the end of 2007, such
2007. sampai akhir 2007.
seminars had been conducted 3 times. The first was
in Jakarta, followed by one in Surabaya and in
Selama tahun 2007, melalui program Pendidikan,
Jogjakarta.
Pencegahan
Prevention
Kampanye dan Sosialisasi serta kegiatan Humas

telah dilaksanak an lebih dari 10.000 poin Further, in order to cultivate internal communication,
kegiatan yang menyentuh lebih dari 67.000 orang KPK PR publishes an internal magazine: WartaKPK.
secara tatap muka langsung (direct touch).
In 2007, through the education, campaigning and
Penelitian dan Pengembangan socialization programs, including PR activities,
more than 10,000 activities have been conducted,
1. Implementasi Good Governance (Tata Kelola
touching directly on more than 67,000 lives.
Kepemerintahan yang Baik) melalui
pelaksanaan pilot project Island of Integrity.
Research and Development
Di tahun 2007, KPK secara aktif terus mendukung
pener a pan p raktik-prak tik tata k e l o l a 1. Good Governance through the Island of
k epemer intahan yang baik di daerah. Selain Integrity pilot project
memberikan bimbingan teknis di berbagai In 2007, the KPK actively supported the
daerah mengenai pelaksanaan good governance, implementation of good governance in the regions.
bersama-sama Kementerian PAN, dan BPKP Aside from providing technical guidance in several
Perwakilan; KPK berusaha mengimplementasikan regions on the implementation of good governance,
rencana kerja yang telah disepakati dalam MoU the KPK, in cooperation, with the State Ministry of
yang ditandatangani dengan daerah. Administrative Reform and the BPKP, has attempted
to implement the work plan that was agreed on in a
Salah satu penerapan tata kelola kepemerintahan
Memorandum of Understanding with the regions.
yang baik yang menjadi perhatian KPK adalah
perbaikan layanan publik. Jenis perbaikan
One aspect of good governance that the KPK is
layanan publik yang menjadi perhatian KPK di
particularly interested in is the improvement of
tahun 2007 ini adalah pelayanan perijinan
public services. The specific type of improvement
terpadu dan pelaksanaan e-Procurement di
that the KPK focused on during 2007 was the
daerah. Untuk itu, KPK telah menyusun suatu
One-Roof Licensing Services program and the
kajian mengenai pelayanan terpadu dalam
implementation of e-procurement in the regions.
bentuk buku, CD interaktif, dan VCD mengenai
For these purposes, the KPK designed materials on
“I mplementasi Layanan Ter p adu” d an
One-Roof Licensing Services in the form of books,
mener bitkan buku mengenai e-Procurement
interactive CDs and VCDs, and also published books
yang telah berjalan di daerah. Publik asi ini
on e-procurement in the regions. These publications
didistribusikan ke daerah-daerah dengan harapan
will be distributed to the regions in the hope of
dapat memberikan inspirasi dan mendorong
inspiring and encouraging them to implement the
daerah untuk mengimplementasikannya.
principles and methodologies contained in the
Beberapa upaya monitor terhadap upaya daerah materials.
dalam menindaklanjuti kerjasama (MoU) yang

Pencegahan
Prevention
telah disepakati terus dilakukan dengan berbagai Several monitoring efforts on the efforts of the
cara, baik secara terbuka melalui kunjungan regions in following up on the MoU have been
atau studi, maupun secara surveillance. Hasil implemented, including open visits and studies, and
monitor dijadikan sebagai bahan perbaikan surveillance. The results of such monitoring will be
bagi kegiatan implementasi good governance incorporated into materials designed to encourage
di daerah tersebut. Salah satu studi yang good governance in particular regions. One such
bertujuan untuk upaya monitor ini adalah studi study concerns ” Salary Increases for Public
mengenai ”Pelaksanaan Pemberian Tambahan Servants in the Regions”.
Penghasilan bagi Pegawai Negeri Sipil di
Daerah”. 2. National Anti-Corruption Action Plan (RAN-PK)
and Monitoring the Implementation of
2. Rencana Aksi Nasional Pemberantasan Presidential Instruction No. 5 of 2004.
Korupsi (RAN-PK) dan Monitoring
Pe l a k sanaan Inpres 5 tahun 2004 In its coordinating function under the National
Anti-Corruption Action Plan (RAN-PK), the KPK’s
Sebagai fungsi koordinatif dari RAN-PK,
role in the design of RAN-PK was realized through
keterlibatan KPK di dalam penyusunan RAN-PK
the formulation of the RAD-PK (Regional Anti-
diwujudkan dengan penyusunan Rencana Aksi
Corruption Action Plan), which is composed of a
Daerah-Pemberantasan Korupsi (RAD-PK) yang
se r i e s of FGD s (Foc us Group D i sc ussio ns) ,
terdiri dari serangkaian kegiatan Focus Group
consultations, and public campaign events, including
Discussion (FGD), konsultasi dan kampanye
the facilitation of cooperation between Bappeda and
publik, dan melakukan fasilitasi antara Bappeda
Bawasda to ensure the implementation of RAD-PK in
dan Bawasda untuk meyakinkan implementasi
the regions. In 2007, the only region that involved the
RAD-PK di daerah. Untuk tahun 2007, daerah
KPK it the design of its RAD-PK was Central
yang penyusunan RAD-nya melibatkan KPK
Kalimantan.
adalah Kalimantan Tengah.
In order to ensure the success of the implementation

Untuk menjamin keberhasilan pelaksanaan
of the RAN-PK , a Monitoring and Evaluation
RAN-PK, telah dibentuk Tim Koordinasi
C o o r d i n a t i n g Te a m ( Te a m K o r m o n e v ) was
Monitoring dan Evaluasi (Tim Kormonev) yang
formed, which comes under the auspices of the
dikoordinasikan oleh Men-PAN. Keterlibatan
State Ministry of Administrative Reform. The KPK’s
KPK dalam kegiatan Kormonev ini antara lain
involvement in the Coordinating Team’s activities
adalah sosialisasi dan memonitor implementasi
include the socializing and monitoring of RAD-PK
RAD-PK di pemerintahan daerah dan RAN-PK di
implementa¬tion at regional goverment level, as
instansi pusat. KPK ikut terlibat dalam kegiatan
well as the RAN-PK of the Central Government. The
Kormonev untuk provinsi Kaltim, Sumbar, NAD,
KPK is also involved in Coordinating Team activities
Papua, dan DI Yogyakarta.
for the Provinces of East Kalimantan, West Sumatra,
Aceh, Papua, and Jogjakarta.
3. Studi.
Untuk memberikan masukan bagi organisasi 3. Studies
dan bagi pelaksanaan strategi, diperlukan
In order to provide input for the KPK organization
kegiatan pemetaan dan penentuan target yang
and for the purpose of strategy implementation,
dilakukan dalam bentuk kegiatan studi. Kegiatan
mapping and target-setting work needs to be
studi yang menjadi fokus di tahun 2007 adalah
undertaken through the conducting of studies. In
Studi Integritas Sektor Publik yang bertujuan
2007, the focus has been on Public Sector Integrity,
melakukan pemetaan terhadap 30 instansi
with 30 institutions targeted for mapping based
berdasarkan layanan publiknya. Studi ini
on the public services they provide. This study has
merupak an hasil kerjasama KPK dan Korea
been the result of cooperation between the KPK
Independent Commision Against Corruption
and the Korean Independent Commission Against
(KICAC). Metodologi yang digunakan dalam

Pencegahan
Prevention
penelitian ini mengacu pada metodologi yang Corruption (KICAC). The methodology used in this
sejak tahun 2002 digunakan oleh KICAC dalam study is based on a similar study carried out by the
mengukur integritas seluruh institusi di Korea KICAC in 2002, when it assessed the integrity of all
selama ini. South Korean government institutions.
Beberapa studi yang dilakukan oleh KPK dalam Among the studies performed by the KPK in 2007
tahun 2007 adalah sebagai berikut: are the following:
a. Meningkatkan Kinerja PNS Melalui a. Study in the Gorontalo Provincial Government
Perbaikan Penghasilan: Studi Analisis and TPPK in the Pekanbaru City Government.
TKD di Pemerintah Provinsi Gorontalo This study was intended to provide a picture of
dan TPPK di Pemerintah Kota Pekanbaru. the results produced by increasing the income
Studi ini bertujuan untuk memotret hasil of public officials in the Gorontalo Provincial
pelaksanaan kebijakan pemberian tambahan Government and the Pekanbaru City Government.
penghasilan bagi PNS di Pemerintah Provinsi The purpose of the income improvement policy
Gorontalo dan di Pemerintah Kota Pekanbaru. was to achieve more equal income distribution
Tujuan diberlakukannya kebijakan perbaikan among public officials, to improve discipline and
penghasilan ini diantaranya adalah untuk to improve staff performance. The study analysed
tercapainya pemerataan penghasilan di whether the implementation of the policy had
kalangan PNS, peningkatan disiplin dan produced the desired results. The main finding of
perbaikan kinerja. Untuk itu studi ini juga the study was that higher income alone was
menganalisis apakah dalam implementasinya, insufficient to improve the performance of public
kebijakan tambahan penghasilan yang officials. Clear attributes are required in measuring
dilakukan ini dapat mencapai tujuan seperti performance, as well as the fair implementation of
yang diharapk an. Dari studi ini dapat sanctions.
disimpulkan bahwa perbaikan penghasilan
tidak begitu saja dapat meningkatkan kinerja b. ” To Understand and to S e r ve” S eries:
PNS, dibutuhkan atribut yang jelas dalam Implementing e-Announcement and
mengatur ukuran kinerja dan pemberlakuan e-Procurement in Government Goods and
sanksi yang adil. Services Procurement Processes.
This publication is aimed at central and local
b. S e ri M emahami untuk M elayani: government institutions to give them an
M elaksanak an e -Announcement dan understanding of what e-procurement is all about
e-Procurement dalam sistem Pengadaan within the scope of the government goods and
Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah . Publikasi services procurement system. E-procurement has
ini ditujukan kepada seluruh instansi di pusat been proven to support efficiency and produce
dan daerah untuk memberi pemahaman transparency. Soon, the national government
mengenai e-Procurement dalam sistem goods and services procurement system will go
pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. on-line. Thus, this book is hoped to provide
e-Procurement telah terbukti mampu preliminary information for the regions and
menunjang efisiensi dan menghasilkan institutions that are planning to implement
transparansi. Dalam waktu dekat, sistem e-procurement.
pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah
seca ra nasio nal direnc anak an ak an c. P r e v e n t i n g C o r r u p t i o n t h r o u g h e-
meng gunakan sistem e-Procurement. Oleh procurement.
karena itu, buku ini diharapkan dapat Reviewing the success of e-procurement
memberikan informasi awal bagi daerah implementation by the City Government
atau instansi yang mempunyai rencana untuk of Surabaya. This study shows the benefits
menerapkan e-Procurement dalam sistem and positive impacts felt by the city of Surabaya
pengadaan barang dan jasa di lingkungannya. after 3 years of the implementation of its
e-procurement program. The success achieved
Pencegahan
Prevention
c. Mencegah Korupsi melalui e-Proc urement.
Meninjau Keberhasilan Pela k s an a an
e -Procurement di Pemerintah Kota
Surabaya.
Studi ini menggambarkan manfaat dan
dampak positif yang dirasakan Pemerintah
Kota Surabaya dalam pelaksanaan
e-Procurement yang sudah mulai
d i l a k sanakan sejak tahun 2004. Keberhasilan
yang dicapai oleh Pemerintah Kota Surabaya
da lam m elak sanak an e -Proc ure me n t
tersebut diharapkan bisa membuat instansi
dan pemerintah daerah lain ikut tertarik
melaksanakan e-Procurement dalam sistem
pengadaan barang dan jasa di instansi atau
pemerintah daerahnya.
by the Surabaya City Government in the
d. Seri Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik: implementation of its e-procurement program
Studi Implementasi Layanan Terpadu. is hoped to inspire other institutions
Untuk tahun 2007, implementasi layanan and governments to implement their own
perijinan dan nonperijinan merupakan e-procurement programs.
salah satu fokus KPK. Tujuannya adalah agar
semakin banyak pemerintah daerah yang d. Good Governance Series: Study on
serius menerapkan konsep layanan terpadu Implementation of One-Roof Services. In 2007,
ini. Prosedur, dampak, dan kisah sukses the provision of licensing and non-licensing ser-
tiga daerah (Kabupaten Sragen, Kota vices was a KPK focus. The aim is to encourage
Pare -Pare, dan Kota Yogyak ar ta) dalam more regional governments to apply the one-roof
mengimplementasikan layanan terpadu akan services concept. The procedures, impacts, and the
dijelaskan dan ditampilkan dalam bentuk success stories of three regions (Regency of Sragen,
buku, CD multimedia, dan DVD Video. City of Sare-Sare, and City of Jogjakarta) in
e. Studi Integritas Sektor Publik, merupakan providing integrated services are explained in the
salah satu studi yang direncanakan akan book, and in the related CD and DVD.
dilaksanakan setiap tahun. Tahun 2007 ini
merupakan baseline untuk pelaksanaan e. Public Sector Study on Integrity -- a survey
studi selanjutnya. Tujuan utama studi adalah implemented annually. The study conducted in
melakuk an pemeringk atan dari seluruh 2007 will serve as the baseline for future studies.
institusi baik pusat maupun daerah yang The main aim of this study is to rank all institutions
ada di Indonesia. Pendekatan pemeringkatan at both the central and local levels in Indonesia.
digunakan agar institusi yang dinilai dapat The ‘ranking’ approach is used so that the
memacu perbaikan layanan yang diberikan institutions evaluated will be able to make
institusinya. Studi ini merupakan hasil improvements on the services they provide. This
kerjasama antara KPK dan KICAC Korea. study is the result of cooperation underway
Keterbatasan anggaran mengakibatkan untuk between the KPK and the KICAC of South Korea
tahun 2007 ini, responden dibatasi hanya di since 2002. Budget limitations restricted the 2007
area Jabodetabek. study to respondents within Greater Jakarta.
Untuk 2007, penilaian dilakukan dengan In 2007, the ranking of 30 central government
melakukan pemeringkatan terhadap 30 institutions was carried out. The integrity
instansi yang berada di pusat. Pemeringkatan ranking is based on the integrity of the public
integritas ditentukan berdasarkan integritas services provided by each institution. From each
dari layanan publik yang diberikan di tiap sample institution, 3-4 service units representing

Pencegahan
Prevention
instansi. Dari tiap instansi sampel, dipilih 3-4 public services provided by that institution were
unit layanan yang mencerminkan pelayanan chosen. The respondents were the end-users of the
publik dari instansi tersebut. Responden services provided by the institutions. The total
adalah penerima layanan dari jenis layanan number of respondents was 3600. Integrity
publik sample di tiap instansi tersebut. indicators are evaluated based on the experience of
Total responden dalam studi ini berjumlah integrity and the integrity potential of each in-
3600 responden. Indikator integritas dinilai stitution. Each indicator in the study is weighted
berdasarkan pengalaman integritas dan based on the results of discussions by 23 experts,
potensi integritas di tiap lembaga. Tiap and was calculated using the Analytical
indikator dalam studi ini mempunyai bobot Hierarchy Process method.
yang ditentukan berdasarkan hasil diskusi
23 ahli yang di hitung melalui metode The study found that the average integrity level of
Analytical Hierarchy Proces (AHP).
each of the 30 institutions was 5.53. On a scale of
1-10, this average is quite low, especially compared
Hasil dari studi ini adalah: Nilai rata-rata
to other nations such as Korea which have an
tingkat Integritas dari 30 institusi adalah
average of over 7. The results of the study shall be
5,53. Dengan skala 1-10 nilai ini termasuk
publicized widely in order to support the
rendah, terlebih dibandingkan dengan negara
lain seperti Korea yang memiliki rata-rata improvement of public services in the institutions
which have participated in the study.
Total Skoring dan Peringkat Tingkat Integritas Lembaga

Total Score and Integrity Rank of Department
Depar tment Experienced Potential Score of Rank

Integrity Integrity Integrity
BKN 5,89 7,34 6,31 1
Dep. Dalam Negeri 6,14 6,49 6,25 2
PT. PERTANI 6,02 6,52 6,17 3
Dep. Perdagangan 5,99 6,59 6,17 4
TASPEN 6,02 6,37 6,12 5
Dep. Koperasi & UKM 5,91 6,52 6,09 6
BPOM 5,79 6,81 6,09 7
Depdiknas 5,82 6,49 6,02 8
PT. ASKES 5,80 6,37 5,97 9
Jasa Raharja 5,82 6,22 5,94 10
BKPM 5,73 6,20 5,87 11
Dep. Sosial 5,65 6,35 5,86 12
Dep. Perindustrian 5,52 6,59 5,84 13
TELKOM 5,49 6,38 5,75 14
Depar temen Keuangan 5,60 6,05 5,73 15
PERTAMINA 5,44 6,29 5,69 16
BRI 5,40 6,19 5,63 17
RSCM 5,55 5,80 5,62 18
PT. Jamsostek 5,52 5,84 5,62 19
Dep. Kelautan dan Perik anan 5,28 5,72 5,41 20
Mahk amah Agung 5,30 5,24 5,28 21
Depar temen Kesehatan 4,85 6,21 5,25 22
PT.PLN 4,95 5,64 5,16 23
Depar temen Agama 4,92 5,72 5,15 24
Dep. Naker trans 4,40 5,93 4,85 25
Kepolisian RI 4,80 4,84 4,81 26
PT. Pelindo 4,50 5,39 4,76 27
Dep. Perhubungan 4,18 4,38 4,24 28
BPN 3,88 4,84 4,16 29
Dep. Hukum & HAM
Rata-rata
3,92
5,34
4,67
5,60
4,15
5,53
30
77
Pencegahan
Prevention
tingkat integritas diatas 7. f. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Study. Based

Hasil studi ini akan dipublikasikan secara on provisions of the UNCAC which focus on the
luas untuk memberikan efek yang mendukung importance of preventing corruption in the private
perbaikan pelayanan p ublik d i ins t it u s i sector, the KPK is researching and mapping what
ya ng diuk ur integr itasnya da l am s t u d i good corporate governance will look like
ini. in Indonesia. This study is being undertaken
in preliminary form by the KPK in order to gauge
f. Studi Good Corporate Governance (GCG). how close private corporations listed on the stock
M erujuk isi dar i UN CAC me ng e nai exchange and state-owned enterprises, are to
pentingnya p enc egahan k oru ps i d i applying GCG principles. This study involved 68
sek tor swasta, maka KPK juga mendalami dan comp a n i e s from va r i ous i n d ust r y gro ups.
melakukan pemetaan terhadap pelaksanaan Respondents, who provided reflections on the
tata kelola perusahaan yang baik di Indonesia. conditions in each company, were selected
Studi ini dilakukan sebagai tahap awal bagi internally by each company, and included
KPK untuk mengkaji sejauh mana perusahaan c o m m i s s i o n e r s, d i r e c t o r s, s t a f f, a s w e l l a s
swasta yang terdaftar dalam bursa efek individuals external to the companies, but who
dan perusahaan BUMN telah menerapkan were related to the company’s activities, such as
GCG. Studi ini melibatkan 68 perusahaan yang suppliers and service users.
berasal dari berbagai kelompok industri.
Responden yang digunakan untuk g. Health Modelling in Indonesia. The results of this
merefleksikan kondisi di tiap perusahaan study are contained in a video documenting best
berasal dar i inter nal p erusa haan it u practice and regional government policies in the
sendiri, mulai dari komisaris, direktur, provision of health services in the selected regions.
hingga pegawai maupun eksternal This document is intended to support the KPK’s
perusahaan yang terkait dengan kegiatan usa- socialization efforts in supporting improvements to
ha perusahaan tersebut seperti supplier mau- the provision of public services. The regions which
pun pengguna jasa dari perusahaan. provided material for this document were the City
of Palangkaraya and the Regency of Jembrana.
g. Modelling Kesehatan di Indonesia.
Hasil dari studi ini berupa video yang h. Study on the Implementation of UNCAC in
berisikan dokumentasi best practices Indonesia. This study is a continuation of the
dari kebijakan pemerintah daerah dalam UNCAC Gap Analysis which the KPK produced
memberikan layanan kesehatan di daerahnya. recently, and documents the activities and
Dokumentasi ini digunakan untuk menunjang programs Indonesia has conducted which are
sosialisasi KPK dalam mendukung perbaikan related to the implementation of UNCAC provisions.
layanan publik. Daerah yang dijadik an D a t a a n d i n for ma t i on col l e c t i on o n the
bahan dokumentasi dalam modelling ini implementation of UNCAC is one of the main stages
adalah Palangkaraya (Kalimantan Tengah) in reviewing the success of UNCAC implementation,
dan Jembrana (Bali). while these reviews will be on of the main items on the
agenda at the upcoming second UNCAC convention,
h. Studi Implementasi UNCAC di Indonesia. which will be held in Bali in February 2008. As the host
Studi ini merupakan lanjutan dari gap analysis and one of the focal points of corruption eradication in
UNCAC terhadap peraturan dan perundangan Indonesia, this study is an important document that
Indonesia yang pernah dilakukan KPK. Studi the KPK will use during its participation in the
ini m endo k umentasik an k egiat an d an convention.
program yang dilakukan Indonesia terkait
dengan implentasi pasal-pasal dalam UNCAC.
Proses pengumpulan data dan informasi
mengenai implementasi UNCAC yang telah
dilakukan suatu negara merupakan salah

Pencegahan
Prevention
satu tahapan penting dalam mereview

keberhasilan pelaksanaan UNCAC. Proses
review dari implementasi UNCAC merupakan
salah satu pokok bahasan dalam konvensi
kedua negara peserta UNCAC yang akan
diselenggarakan di Bali pada Februari 2008
nanti. Sebagai tuan rumah, studi ini
merupakan salah satu dokumen penting
yang akan digunakan KPK dalam
k e i k u t ser taannya di konvensi tersebut.
Monitor
U nda ng-un dang No mo r 30 Tahun 2002 Monitoring
menga ma natk an KPK untuk m elak sa nak an Law No. 30 of 2002 mandates the KPK to perform
tugas monitor terhadap lembaga negara dan monitoring in respect of state and public institutions
pemer inta han dengan m engk aj i s is te m by evaluating the administrative management
pengelolaan administrasi di Lembaga Negara systems of such institutions, by providing suggestions/
da n pemer intahan, mem ber ik an s aran/ recommendations to those institutions, and by
rek omenda si k ep ada instansi ter k ai t , d an monitoring the implementation of recommendations.
memantau implementasi rekomendasi. Kegiatan There now follows a description of the monitoring
monitor yang telah dilakukan KPK pada tahun 2007. work performed by the KPK in 2007.
1. Kajian Sistem, dilakukan oleh KPK bertujuan 1. System Evaluation, performed by the KPK in order
unt uk menc egah terjadinya TPK d an to prevent the commission of corruption and to
meningk atk an efisiensi dan efek t iv it as increase efficiency and effectiveness in the execution of
pelaksanaan tugas instansi yang menjadi obyek the duties of the institution being evaluated.
kajian. a. System Evaluations in State and Public
Institutions.
a. Kajian Sistem di Lembaga Negara dan Pe- The system evaluations that have been
merintahan. conducted to date are as follows:
t Evaluation of Indonesian Migrant Labor
Kajian sistem di lembaga negara dan (TKI) Placement System. This included an
pemerintahan yang telah dilakuk an evaluation of pre-placement systems,
adalah sebagai berikut: evaluation during placement, and evaluation
r Pengkajian Sistem Penempatan Tenaga post-placement (returning home). The
Kerja Indonesia (TKI), evaluation activities performed in 2007 were
mencakup pengkajian sistem the continuation of activities initiated in
prapenempatan, saat penempat a n , November 2006. From these evaluations,
d a n p a s c a p e n e m patan (pemulangan) the following findings are of particular
TKI. K egiatan p engk aj ian s is te m importance:
penempatan TKI yang dilakukan pada t Bribery is common in the processing of
tahun 2007 merupak an kelanjutan migrant worker documents.
kegiatan yang sama yang telah dimulai t There are no service standards that
pada bulan November tahun 2006. Dari regulate procedures, requirements, costs,
kajian ini, diperoleh 11 (sebelas) temuan and the time limit within which services
pokok, yaitu: must be performed.
t M arak nya p raktik suap d al am t The processing of migrant worker
pengurusan do k um en C TKI . documents is unprofessional, as reflected by

Pencegahan
Prevention
t Belum ada standar pelayanan baku (a) the lack of a queuing system; (b) BP2TKI
yang mengatur tentang prosedur, and Disnaker at the Regency/ City lev-
p ersyaratan, b iaya, da n w ak t u els do not generally have front offices;
p enyelesaian pelayanan . (c) Direct contact between service users
t Pelayanan pengurusan dokumen CTKI and back office officials; (d) inadequate
kurang profesional, yang tercermin service information; (e) no receipts given
dari: (a) Tidak ada sistem antrian; (b) out; and (f ) inadequate service facilities.
BP2TKI dan Disnaker Kabupaten/Kota t Placement services and the protection of
umumnya tidak memiliki loket migrant workers are not supported by an
pelayanan (front office); (c) Terjadi adequate information management
kontak langsung antara pengguna jasa system.
dan petugas/pejabat back office; (d) t The migrant labor recruitment process is
Informasi pelayanan kurang memadai; fraught with middlemen.
(e) Tidak ada tanda terima berkas; dan t No standardization of training for migrant
(f ) Sarana pelayanan kurang memadai. workers at the pre-placement stage.
t Pelayanan penempatan dan t No standardization of migrant worker
perlindungan TKI belum didukung placement costs.
dengan sistem manajemen informasi t Inadequate monitoring of placement
yang memadai. institutions.
t Maraknya praktik percaloan dalam t No checks made on the substantive terms
proses perekrutan CTKI. of placement contracts and work
t Belum ada standardisasi pelatihan contracts.
prapenempatan CTKI. t Terminal 3 of Soekarno Hatta Airport
t Belum ada standardisasi biaya has to date been unable to justify its
penempatan TKI. establishment as part of an effort to
t Kurang memadainya pengawasan protect migrant workers, as reflected by
terhadap lembaga penempatan. the following issues: (a) the steering of
t Belum ada pemeriksaan terhadap home-bound workers through Terminal
substansi perjanjian penempatan dan 3 not yet effective; (b) no official at the
perjanjian kerja. information center counter; (c) workers
t Terminal 3 Bandara Soekarno Hatta often forced to exchange their foreign
belum dapat merealisasikan konsep currency at sub-market rates; (d) land
awal tentang diperlukannya Terminal transportation fares from Terminal 3 far
3 sebagai bagian dari upaya more expensive than normal transporta-
p e r lindungan terhadap TKI yang tion fees; (e) No explanations on how long
tercermin dari hal-hal berikut: (a) a worker must wait between the time they
Kegiatan pemanduan kepada TKI buy their tickets until the time the bus or
yang pulang melalui Terminal 3 belum minibus departs.
dilakukan secara efektif; (b) Tidak ada r *OBEFRVBUF RVBOUJUZ BOE RVBMJUZ PG TUBGG
petugas yang berjaga di counter pusat in government agencies responsible for
informasi; (c) Para TKI sering dipaksa the placement, processing and protection
untuk menukarkan valasnya dengan of TKI.
kurs yang lebih rendah daripada
market rate; (d) Tarif angkutan darat
yang disediakan di Terminal 3 jauh
lebih mahal daripada tarif umum; (e)
Tidak ada kejelasan mengenai waktu
tunggu TKI sejak membeli tiket sampai
pemberangkatan kendaraan yang

Pencegahan
Prevention
mengantar mereka pulang. The above weaknesses have given rise to the
t Kurang memadainya kuantitas dan following problems:
k ualitas SDM di instansi y ang t Sub-optimal migrant worker placement
bertanggung jawab dalam prose s services.
penempatan dan perlindungan TK I . t Ample opportunities for officials to engage
in corrupt activities in the form of the
Kelemahan-kelemahan di atas collection of illicit fees for all types of services
mengakibatkan terjadinya hal-hal berikut: provided.
t Pelayanan penempatan TKI kurang t Protection provided for migrant workers
optimal. extremely weak.
t Membuka kesempatan bagi oknum
The results of the migrant worker placement
petugas/pejabat untuk melakukan
system survey has been communicated to the
tindak pidana korupsi dalam bentuk
Department of Manpower and Transportation and
pungutan liar untuk semua jenis
the BNP2TKI (National Board for Placement and
pelayanan yang diberikan.
Protection of Migrant Workers) on August 28th,
t Perlindungan kepada CTKI/TKI sangat
2007.
lemah.
t Evaluation of Import Administration System
Hasil kajian sistem penempatan TKI telah at the Directorate General of Customs and
dipaparkan kepada Depnakertrans dan Excise (DJBC). Analysis results show various
BNP2TKI (Badan Nasional Penempatan dan weaknesses in import services and the
Perlindungan TKI) pada tanggal 28 Agustus monitoring of goods traffic, which created
2007. opportunities for corruption in the form of illicit
fee collection and acts of collusion. The findings
r Pengkajian Sistem Administrasi of the analysis are as follows:
Impor di Direktorat Jenderal Bea Cukai t Corruption in the form of illicit fee-
(DJBC). Hasil k ajian menunjukk an collecting usually occurs at the ‘analyzing
masih adanya kelemahan-kelemahan point’, when documents are received, when
dalam pelayanan impor dan pengawasan goods are released, and when manifests are
lalu lintas barang yang menimbulkan closed. Corruption in these forms is worth
peluang terjadinya korupsi baik dalam IDR890,000,000.00 per month.
bentuk pungutan liar maupun kolusi. t Corruption in the form of collusion at points
Beberapa temuan tersebut adalah: of physical examination, document
t Tindak pidana korupsi berupa pungutan examination, inventorization, and
liar yang terjadi di titik analyzing point, document processing in bonded zones is
penerimaan dokumen, pengeluaran worth IDR12,795,000,000.00 per month
barang, dan penutupan manifest in value. This amount accounts for an
mencapai nilai Rp890.000.000,00 per estimated 30% of all transactions; thus in
bulan. reality the total value of collusive activities
t Tindak pidana korupsi dalam bentuk may reach far more than Rp. 12 billion per
kolusi di titik pemeriksaan fisik, month.
pemeriksaan dokumen, perbendaha- r 5IFGBJMVSFUPDPOEVDUQFSJPEJDFWBMVBUJPOT
raan, d a n p e n g u r u s a n d o k u m e n of importer profiles has reduced the
di kawasan berikat mencapai nilai accuracy of the importer’ profile database
Rp12.795.000.000,00 per bulan. Nilai to the point of unreliability – this has lead to
ini hanyalah perkiraan 30% dari ineffective monitoring of the flow of goods.
jumlah transaksi, sehingga sebenarnya r *NQPSUFST BSF BCMF UP QIZTJDBMMZ DIPPTF
nilai kolusi jauh di atas 12 miliar rupiah the examiners they prefer; thus increasing
per bulan. the possibility for collusion with Customs
t Tidak dilakukannya evaluasi profil and Excise officials.

Pencegahan
Prevention
im p o r t i r s e c a r a b e r k a l a y a n g r /P UFDIOJDBM HVJEFMJOFT GPS EPDVNFOU

mengakibatkan keakuratan database examination means that the door is wide
profil importir belum dapat dihandalkan open to abuse.
sehingga pengawasan terhadap arus r %JGGJDVMUZ PG NPOJUPSJOH CPOEFE [POFT
barang menjadi tidak efektif. located far away from the Custom and
t Importir dapat memilih pemeriksa fisik Excise Offices (KPBC) raises the potential
yang dikehendaki yang mengakibatkan for smuggling.
kemungkinan kolusi dengan petugas.
Thus, in order to facilitate the provision of
t Tidak adanya petunjuk te k nis
prime-level service through effective
p em er ik saan do k umen s e hing g a
monitoring, and in order to minimize the
memungkinkan terjadinya banyak
opportunity for corruption, the KPK suggests
penyimpangan.
a number of reforms for the DJBC, with the
t Sulitnya pengawasan terhadap
primary focus being on the restructuring of
kawasan berikat yang lokasinya jauh
human resources management, more
dari Kantor Pelayanan Bea dan Cukai
effective institutionalization of control and
(KPBC) yang menimbulkan potensi
internal monitoring, and the enforcement of a
penyelundupan.
code of ethics and code of conducts.
Oleh k arenanya, untuk m am pu The Report on Administrative System

memberikan pelayanan yang prima Examination were communicated to DJBC
dengan tingkat pengawasan yang efektif, officials on June 18th, 2007. The Directorate
dan meminimalkan kemungkinan General of Tariffs and Quotas has relayed its
terjadinya tindak pidana korupsi, KPK appreciation of the findings communicated
memberik an saran agar dilakuk an by the KPK, and is committed to conducting
reformasi di DJBC dengan fokus utama improvements on import administration ser-
adalah pembenahan manajemen sumber vices through the establishment of a Main
daya manusia, pelembagaan pengendalian Services Office (Kantor Pelayanan Utama –
dan pengawasan internal yang lebih KPU).
efektif, dan penegakan kode etik (code of The KPU was formally established on Monday,
ethics) dan pedoman perilaku (code of July 2nd, 2007, at the Area IV DJBC Office, and,
conducts). during the initial stages, its work will be confined
to Tanjung Priok. The KPU is expected to realize
Laporan Hasil Kajian Sistem Administrasi improvements in the services and security
Impor telah dipaparkan kepada para pe- provided in the context of DJBC issues, and to
jabat DJBC pada 18 Juni 2007. Dirjen Bea offer various benefits, such as the provision of
dan Cukai menunjukkan apresiasi atas ha- services free of illicit fees, hand-picked
sil kajian yang telah dipaparkan oleh KPK staff, simplification of import procedures,
dan ber k o m itmen untuk me l ak u k an implementation of improved physical
per b aikan pelayanan administrasi impor examination procedures, a new internal
melalui penerapan Kantor Pelayanan compliance unit, and the optimal use of
Utama (KPU). information technology to support the pro-
Peresmian KPU telah dilakukan pada vision of services and monitoring.
Senin, 2 Juli 2007 di Kantor Wilayah IV As a continuation of import administration
DJBC dan sebagai tahap awal KPU evaluation, and to ensure that the KPU’s
diterap k an di Tanjung Pr io k . K P U services turn out to be as good as hoped for, the
diharapk an menjadi wujud nyata KPK commenced an evaluation of the services
perbaikan pelayanan dan pengawasan provided by the KPU in September 2007. As of
kepabeanan DJBC yang menawarkan October 31st, 2007, the evaluation was
berbagai keunggulan utama, yaitu continuing and is expected to be finished by
pelayanan tanpa pungli, SDM pilihan, December 2007.

Pencegahan
Prevention
simplifikasi prosedur impor, penerapan

prosedur pemeriksaan fisik yang telah
diperbaiki, adanya unit kepatuhan internal,
dan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi
ya ng o p timal untuk mend u k u ng
pelayanan dan pengawasan.
Sebagai kelanjutan atas kajian sistem
administrasi impor dan untuk memastikan
bahwa pelayanan KPU sesuai dengan
yang diharapkan, mulai September 2007
KPK melakukan kajian terhadap sistem
pelayanan di KPU.
t Analysis of the Expor t and Impor t
t Pengkajian Sistem Administrasi Ekspor Administration System at the Main Services
dan Impor di Kantor Pelayanan Uta- Office (Kantor Pelayanan Utama – KPU) at
ma (KPU) Tanjung Priok. Hasil kajian Tanjung Priok. Analysis results show that:
menunjukkan: t A large number of services are still being
t Masih banyaknya proses pelayanan provided manually, for example:
dilakukan secara manual, contohnya : oversight of SPKPBM (documents specifying
pemantauan terhadap SPKPBM, the custom duties on particular goods), the
konfirmasi dan rekonsiliasi BC 2.3, confirmation and reconciliation of BC 2.3
pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan forms/procedures, and monitoring of the
tugas Client Coordinator. implementation of Client Coordinator
t Belum diterbitkannya perubahan duties.
tatalaksana ekspor seiring dengan t No new procedures have been published
perubahan definisi ekspor yang despite the new definition of ‘exports’ in
tercantum dalam undang-undang the recently amended Customs and Excise
kepabeanan. Law.
t Lemahnya kontrol terhdap kepatuhan t Weak control of compliance in the area
pembayaran PNBP ekspor. of non-tax state revenues (PNPB) arising
t Belum adanya profiling eksportir from exports.
sebagai pendukung pencegahan t Lack of exporter profiling to prevent fictitious
terjadinya ekspor fiktif. exports.
t Tidak dituangkannya hasil pengujian t Results of reasonableness tests for customs
kewajaran nilai pabean ke dalam duties were not set out in Customs Duties
Lembar Penelitian dan Penetapan Assessment and Determination Forms (BCF
Nilai Pabean (BCF 2.7) oleh Pejabat 2.7) by the officials responsible for document
Fungsional Pemeriksa dokumen examination. This was a clear violation of
(PFPD). Hal ini merupakan pelanggaran DJBC Directive No. P-01/BC/2007.
terhadap Peraturan Dirjen Bea dan r 5IF EJGGJDVMUZ PG NPOJUPSJOH 'PMMPX6Q
Cukai nomor P-01/BC/2007. Action Memos on the findings of audits
t Sulitnya pengawasan terhadap Nota has resulted in a significant backlog in
Dinas Tindak Lanjut laporan hasil monitoring duties.
audit sehingga m enyeb abk an r 'PMMPX6Q"DUJPO.FNPTJTTVFECZUIFJOUFS-
menumpuknya beban kerja nal compliance officer to the Head of the
pengawasan. Main Customs and Excise Services Office
t Tindak lanjut nota dinas kepala bidang (KPU) could not be immediately followed
kepatuhan internal kepada Kepala up on. As a result, significant amounts
KPU tidak dapat langsung diputuskan of time are consumed in dealing with
breaches by officials.

Pencegahan
Prevention
sehingga memakan banyak waktu r 3FTVMUT PG UIF FYBNJOBUJPO PO UIF FYQPSU
dalam penyelesaian kasus pelanggaran import administration system at the Tanjung
pegawai. Prior Main Customs and Excise Services Office
t Hasil k ajian pengk ajian sistem will be presented in mid-December 2007.
administrasi ekspor impor di KPU
Tanjung Priok akan dipaparkan pada t The evaluation of the Licensing System at the
pertengahan Desember 2007. Involvement Coordinating Board (BKPM), was
conducted as part of the evaluations on business
t Pengkajian Sistem Pelayanan Perijinan licensing services. From this particular evaluation,
di Badan Koordi n asi Pen an a ma n the following important findings surfaced:
M odal (BKPM), merupak an bagian r /PJOUFSOBM401TBTCFODINBSLGPSPQFSBUJPOT
dar i p engk aj ian ter hadap s is te m r #SJCFSZ JOUIFGPSNPGJMMJDJUGFFDPMMFDUJOH
JT
pelayanan perijinan usaha. Dari kajian common in the licensing services process;
ini, dipero leh b eberapa te m u an r 4UBOEBSEUJNFSFRVJSFEGPSWBSJPVTTFSWJDFTJT
po k o k b er ik ut: much longer than realized;
r "VUPNBUFE TFSWJDF TZTUFN OPU ZFU GVODUJPOJOH
t Belum ada SOP internal sebagai acuan
optimally;
kerja;
r )VNBOSFTPVSDFTNBOBHFNFOUJTJOBEFRVBUF
t Maraknya praktik suap (pungutan liar)
dalam proses pelayanan perijinan;
The results of the BKPM evaluation will be
t Standar waktu penyelesaian beberapa
informed to the BKPM in December 2007.
jenis pelayanan jauh lebih lama
dibandingkan realisasinya;
b. Literature Study. This has carried out on Government
t Otomatisasi sistem pelayanan belum
Regulation (PP) No. 37 of 2006 on the Second
optimal;
Amendment of Government Regulation No. 24 of 2004
t Manajemen sumber daya manusia
on the status and finances of local parliament leaders
kurang baik;
and members.
Hasil kajian sistem perijinan di BKPM
From this evaluation, it was revealed that Government
ak an dipapark an kepada BKPM pada
Regulation No. 37 suffers from various weaknesses,
Desember 2007.
including the following:
t Unclear performance indicators and hazy
b. Kajian Literatur. Kajian literatur yang telah
accountability regarding the use of
dilakukan adalah pengkajian terhadap PP Nomor
communications allowances and operational
37 tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas
funds. This creates the potential of these funds not
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor
being used for the purposes for which they were
24 Tahun 2004 tentang Kedudukan Protokoler
allocated,, thus imposing an extra burden on the
dan Keuangan Pimpinan dan Anggota DPRD.
regions.
Dari kajian ini, ditemukan beberapa kelemahan
r 4FWFSBMGVOEJOHJUFNTPWFSMBQXJUIPOFBOPUIFS
yang terkandung dalam PP No. 37 tahun 2006
representation allowance; status allowance,
tersebut, yaitu:
and DPRD equipment allowance.
t Tidak jelasnya indik ator k inerja dan
r 5IFCFOFGJUTBSFBMMFRVBMJOTJ[FTPUIBUUIFSFJT
pertanggungjawaban penggunaan tunjangan
a risk that DPRD leaders and members will not
komunikasi intensif dan dana operasional. Hal
compete to produce the best performance.
ini menimbulkan potensi tidak terwujudnya
r 1PUFOUJBMUIBUUIFCVEHFUXJMMCFJOGMBUFEUPGVOE
tujuan pemberian tunjangan komunikasi
housing benefits.
intensif dan dana operasional, sehingga
r *OBQQSPQSJBUF 3FUSPBDUJWF BQQMJDBUJPO PG UIF
hanya membebani keuangan daerah.
Regulation and benefits financing.
t Adanya item tunjangan yang be rs if at
ganda, yaitu uang representasi, tunjangan

Pencegahan
Prevention
jabatan, dan tunjangan alat kelengkapan On March 16th, 2007, the Government published
DPRD. Government Regulation No. 21 of 2007 on the Third
t Besar tunjangan sama rata sehingga Amendment of Government Regulation No. 24 of
tidak mendorong Pimpinan dan Anggota 2004 on the status and finances of local parliament
DPRD untuk berlomba mencapai kinerja yang leaders and members, which is a revision of
terbaik. Government Regulation No. 37 of 2006.
t Adanya potensi memperbesar anggaran untuk
tunjangan perumahan.
t Pemberlakuan surut dan pembebanan
pembayaran tunjangan yang tidak tepat.
Pada 16 Maret 2007, Pemerintah telah

mengeluark an PP Nomor 21 Tahun 2007
tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Peraturan
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun
2004 tentang Kedudukan Protokoler dan
Keuangan Pimpinan dan Anggota DPRD sebagai
revisi terhadap PP Nomor 37 Tahun 2006.
2. Trigger Activities, adalah kegiatan untuk 2. Trigger Activities; these are activities intended to
mendorong satu atau beberapa lembaga negara encourage one or more state or government agencies
dan pemerintahan untuk mengimplementasikan to implement systems that would have a major impact
suatu sistem yang dinilai memberi dampak on the anti-corruption effort. The KPK has encouraged
yang besar terhadap upaya pemberantasan various such agencies in implementing the following:
korupsi ,KPK telah mendorong lembaga negara
dan pemerintahan untuk mengimplementasikan a. E-Announcement
hal-hal berikut: In an effort to restructure the Government’s
goods and services procurement system, the
a. E-Announcement KPK has provided suggestions and pushed for
Da la m upaya mem per baik i s is te m quick-win strategies to improve transparency
pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah, in the Government goods and services
KPK telah memberi saran dan mendorong procurement process through the implementation
adanya quick-win untuk meningkatk a n of e-announcement on the National Procurement
transparansi dalam proses pengadaan website.
ba r a ng dan j asa pemer intah de ng an
penerapan e-Announcement pada situs web E-Announcement is the first stage of the much
Pengadaan Nasional. anticipated e-procurement system, and is the
process of announcing all goods and services
procurements on the National Procurement
Website (www.pengadaannasional-bappenas.
go. id) by all government institutions at both the
central and local levels in Indonesia.
In order to realize the implementation of

‘e-announcement’, the KPK has provided the
following suggestions:
r 5IF 4UBUF .JOJTUFS GPS %FWFMPQNFOU 1MBOOJOH
Head of Bappenas should operate the National
Procurement Announcement website (www.

Pencegahan
Prevention
E-Announcement merupakan tahap awal pengadaannasional-bappenas.go.id), which

da r i sistem e -Procurement d e ng an will be used by Central and Regional
mengumumkan rencana dan pelaksanaan Government institutions to place their
pengadaan barang dan jasa di Website announcements of goods and services
Pengadaan Nasional (www.pengadaan- procurements.
nasional-bappenas.go.id ) oleh seluruh t The M inistr y of Communication and
instansi pemerintah di Indonesia baik di pusat Information should assist in the development of
maupun di daerah. e-announcement applications and other
technology.
Untuk mewujudkan pelaksanaan
In the time between the commencement of
e-Announcement ini, KPK telah memberi saran
e-announcement on January 5th, 2007, and
kepada:
O ctober 31st, 2007, several impor tant
t Menteri Negara Perencanaan e-announcement developmental issues had
Pembangunan/Kepala Bappenas agar arisen:
mengoperasikan website Pengumuman t Only 40 out of the 75 central government
Pengadaan Nasional (www.pengadaan- institutions (53%) have signed up to implement
nasional-bappenas.go.id) yang akan e-announcement;
dipakai oleh semua instansi pemerintah t Only 28 out of 75 central overnment institutions
baik pusat m aup un daerah u nt u k (37%) have announced their procurement plans
menempatkan pengumuman pengadaan on the e-announcement website;
barang/j asa yang telah d an ak an t Only 259 line units out of 922 in Central
dilaksanakan. Institutions have announced their procurement
plans;
t Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika ag ar t The number of planned procurements
membantu dalam bidang pengembangan announced by the aforementioned 28
applikasi dan teknologi E-Announcement. institutions amount to 19,094 plans with a
total value of around IDR8 trillion.
Sejak diresmikan pengoperasiannya pada
5 Januari 2007 sampai dengan 31 Oktober
Observing the development of e-announcement,
2007 terdapat beberapa hal penting yang
the KPK has been made aware of the challenges
menjadi catatan perkembangan
faced, which primarily spring from the low level
e-Announcement, yaitu:
of commitment by the Heads of Government
t Tercatat 40 dari 75 instansi pusat Departments and Institutions to improve
(53%) yang mendaftar untuk melaksanakan transparency and accountability in the
e-Announcement; procurement of goods and services.
t Tercatat baru 28 dari 75 instansi pusat
b. Bureaucratic Reform
(37%) yang telah mengumumkan rencana
Bureaucratic reform has been generally seen as
pengadaannya pada situs pengumuman
nothing more than increases in remuneration;
pengadaan nasional (e-Announcement);
this is not so – instead, bureaucratic reform is
t Dari 922 satuan kerja pada instansi pusat
a process that must incorporate the following
yang telah terdaftar pada e-Announcement
steps:
baru 259 satuan kerja (28%) yang telah
r 5IF BEPQUJPO PG KPC BOBMZTFT UIF XSJUUFO
mengumumkan rencana pengadaannya;
elaboration of hob descriptions; job
t Jumlah paket rencana pengadaan yang
specifications; job grading; and job pricing;
diumumkan oleh 28 instansi tersebut
r 3FGPSNVMBUJPO PG JOTUJUVUJPOBM CVTJOFTT
b aru menc ap ai 19.094 re nc ana
processes in order to ensure that all of these
p engadaan dengan nilai total sekitar
are aimed at the achievement of institutional
Rp8 triliun.
missions;

Pencegahan
Prevention
M elihat per k em bangan pelaks anaan

e-Annoucement tersebut, tantangan yang
dihadapi saat ini adalah masih kurangnya
komitmen pimpinan Departemen dan
Lembaga Pemerintah untuk meningkatkan
t r a nsparansi dan ak untab ilitas d al am
k egiatan pengadaan barang dan jasa.
b. Reformasi Birokrasi
Reformasi birokrasi tidak bisa diartikan hanya
sekedar menaikkan remunerasi pegawai,
melainkan sebuah proses yang sekurang- r $POEVDUJOH PG OFFET BTTFTTNFOUT BOE BTTFTT-
kurangnya terdiri dari tahapan-tahapan ments on the status of Human Resources;
sebagai berikut: r 'PSNVMBUJPO PG QFSGPSNBODF JOEJDBUPST
t Dilakukannya job analysis, penulisan job setting of targets, and the measurement of
descriptions, job specification, job grading, performance;
dan job pricing; r %FUFSNJOBUJPO PG SFNVOFSBUJPO TUSVDUVSF
t Perumusan ulang proses bisnis institusi and size;
untuk memastikan bahwa semua proses r &TUBCMJTINFOU PG MFHBM SVMFT UIBU GPSN
bisnis mengarah pada pencapaian misi the basis for the size and payment of
institusi; remuneration.
t Melakukan assessment kebutuhan dan The effort to push for bureaucratic reform
status SDM; represents a continuation of programs executed
t Perumusan ukuran kinerja, penetapan in 2005 and 2006. In 2007, the KPK encouraged
target, dan pengukuran kinerja; institutions to hasten the implementation of the
t Penentuan struktur dan besaran bureaucratic reform process. These institutions
remunerasi; were: the State Audit Board (BPK); the Supreme
t Penetapan peraturan perundang- Court; the Department of Finance; and the State
undangan yang mendasari besaran dan Ministry of Administrative Reform (MenPAN).
pembayaran remunerasi.
Upaya untuk mendorong reformasi birokrasi Aside from talks between the KPK Commissioners
merupakan program lanjutan yang telah and the aforementioned institutions in order to
dilaksanakan sejak tahun 2005 dan 2006. discuss the steps involved in the bureaucratic
Pada tahun 2007 instansi-instansi yang reform process, every two weeks a routine meeting
didorong oleh KPK untuk segera melaksana- between the KPK and the four Institutions is held,
kan proses reformasi birokrasi adalah: Badan with the KPK acting as a trigger mechanism. These
Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK), Mahkamah routine meetings act as a platform for exchanging
Agung (MA), Departemen Keuangan, dan experience and inputs, as well as for planning the
Kementerian Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur bureaucratic reform program.
Negara (Meneg PAN).
The Department of Finance initiated its bureacracy
Selain pembicaraan pimpinan KPK dengan reform process in early July 2007 and has published
instansi-instansi tersebut untuk membahas its bureaucratic reform program. Meanwhile the
langkah-langkah program reformasi birokrasi, State Audit Board and the Supreme Court have
tiap dua minggu dilakukan pertemuan rutin also taken preliminary steps in their bureaucratic
antara keempat instansi tersebut di mana reform processes.
KPK bertindak sebagai pendorong. Pertemuan
r ut in ini m enjadi ajang untuk b e r bagi

Pencegahan
Prevention
pengalaman dan saling memberi masukan In his State Speech on August 16th, 2007, the
ser ta merencanak an program reformasi President emphasized that the Government will
birokrasi. implement bureaucratic reform in phases based
on proper planning; the President also related
Departemen Keuangan telah melaksanakan how the preliminary step in this direction takes
proses reformasi birokrasinya dan pada the form of the activities now being conducted
awal Juli 2007 D ep ar temen K e u ang an by the Department of Finance, the State Ministry
mengu mumkan ke masyarakat (launching) of Administrative Reform (MenPAN), the Supreme
mengenai program reformasi birokrasi yang Court and the State Audit Board.
sedang dilaksanakannya. Sementara itu, BPK
dan MA juga sudah mengambil langkah awal In August, 2007, the National Parliament finally
dalam proses reformasi birokrasinya. approved funding for the support of bureaucratic
reform in three Institutions: the Department of
Dalam Pidato Kenegaraan Presiden RI tanggal Finance, the State Audit Board, and the Supreme
16 Agustus 2007, Presiden menegaskan bahwa Court.
pemerintah akan melaksanakan reformasi
birokrasi secara bertahap serta terencana In order to encourage the process of bureaucratic
dan sebagai langkah awal telah dimulai reform in other Central Government institutions,
oleh Departemen Keuangan, Kementerian the KPK, in cooperation with the State Apparatus
Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, Reform Ministry, has been making attempts to
Mahkamah Agung dan Badan Pemeriksa sosialize the concept of bureaucratic reform,
Keuangan. including the holding of a national seminar on
November 1st, 2007, titled “Corruption Prevention
Pa d a A g u s t u s 2 0 0 7 , D P R a k h i r n y a through Bureaucratic Reform”. This seminar was
menyetujui anggaran untuk menunjang attended by officials from all Central Institutions.
reformasi birokrasi pada tiga instansi, yaitu:
Departemen Keuangan, BPK dan MA. For the fututre, the KPK will continue to be in the
vanguard of the ongoing bureaucratic reform
Untuk mendorong terus bergulirnya proses process, and will encourage the State Apparatus
reformasi birokrasi di instansi pemerintah Reform Minister to finish the bureaucratic
pusat lainnya, KPK bersama-sama dengan reform Master Plan and General Guidelines.
Kementerian Negara Pendayagunaan
Aparatur Negara b erupay a u nt u k
mensosialisasikan konsep reformasi birokrasi
dengan menyelenggarakan seminar nasional
pada tanggal 1 November 2007 yang bertajuk
“Pencegahan Korupsi melalui Reformasi
Birokrasi.” Seminar ini dihadiri oleh para
pejabat dari seluruh instansi pusat.
Ke depan, KPK akan terus mengawal jalannya

proses reformasi birokrasi yang sedang
dilakukan dan juga mendorong Kementerian
Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara c. Central Customer Database
untuk segera menyelesaikan rancangan induk
The effort to push for the introduction of a Central
dan pedoman umum reformasi birokrasi.
Customer Database (CCD) system began in 2006.
As a follow-up to this effort, between January 1st,
2007, and October 31st. 2007, the KPK conducted
the following steps:
Pencegahan
Prevention
c. Sistem Database Nasabah Terpusat (DNT) r )FMEBNFFUJOHXJUIUIF%JSFDUPSBUFPG-FHBM

Issues and the Directorate of Research and
Upaya untuk mendorong implementasi
Policy-Making at Bank Indonesia.
sistem DNT telah dimulai pada tahun 2006.
r 5IF ,1, BOE #BOL *OEPOFTJB DPOEVDUFE
Sebagai kelanjutannya, sejak 1 Januari
comparative studies in Germany and France
sampai dengan 31 Oktober 2007 KPK telah
on March 5th – 9th of 2007. Germany and
melakukan langkah-langkah berikut:
France were chosen as they have similar
t Rapat dengan Direktorat Hukum dan
CCD systems. Reports on these comparative
Direktorat Penelitian dan Perundangan
studies were compiled on March 23rd, 2007,
Bank Indonesia.
and were discussed with Bank Indonesia on
t KPK bersama-sama dengan BI melakukan
April 5th - 6th, 2007.
studi banding ke Jerman dan Perancis
pada 5–9 Maret 2007. Laporan hasil studi
comparative studies in China and South
banding ke Jerman dan Perancis sudah
K o re a o n M a y 7 t h - 1 1 t h , 2 0 0 7 . These
selesai disusun pada 23 Maret 2007 dan
comparative studies were intended to discover
telah didiskusikan bersama Bank Indonesia
alternative solutions to tracking down the
pada 5–6 April 2007.
assets and accounts of corruptors in financial
institutions without the assitance of a CCD
studi banding ke Cina dan Korea Selatan
system. South Korea was found to not need
pada 7-11 Mei 2007. Studi banding ini
a CCD system because there were not many
bertujuan untuk mencari alternatif solusi
commercial banks operating there, while
pencarian/penelusuran rekening/aset
the situation in China is ameliorated by
tersangka korupsi di lembaga keuangan
the existence of laws that allow reversing
tanpa bantuan sistem DNT. Dari studi
the burden of proof. Further, those countries
banding diketahui bahwa Korsel tidak
boast excellent civil registration systems,
membutuhkan DNT karena bank komersial
which greatly assist with tracing the assets/
di Korsel sedikit, sedangkan Cina terbantu
accounts of corruptors.
dengan adanya sistem pembuktian
terbalik. Selain itu sistem administrasi
comparative studies to Italy and Spain on
kependuduk an dan catatan sipil
July 23rd - 27th, 2007. This comparative
yang sudah baik di kedua negara
study was intended to study the CCD System
juga sangat membantu pencarian/
in Italy and to explore alternative solutions
penelusuran rekening/aset tersangka
for the tracking down of assets without the
pelaku korupsi.
help off CCDs in Spain.
studi banding ke Italia dan Spanyol pada From these comparative studies, it may be
23-27 Juli 2007. Studi banding ini concluded that the CCD system needs to be
dilakukan untuk mempelajari sistem DNT implemented in Indonesia because:
yang terdapat di Italia dan mengetahui r 5IFSFJTBMBSHFOVNCFSPGDPNNFSDJBMCBOLT
alternatif solusi pencarian/penelusuran in Indonesia (129 banks);
rekening/aset tersangka korupsi tanpa r 5IFSFJTOPSFWFSTBMPGUIFCVSEFOPGQSPPG
bantuan sistem DNT di Spanyol. r $JWJMSFHJTUSBUJPOTZTUFNTBSFTVCQBS
Dari hasil studi banding tersebut dapat Therefore, the KPK will continue to push for the
ditarik kesimpulan bahwa sistem DNT perlu i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e CC D S y s t e m i n
untuk diimplementasikan di Indonesia karena: Indonesia.
t Jumlah bank umum di Indonesia cukup
d. Regional Budget (APBD) Transparency
banyak (129 bank);
t Belum ada sistem pembuktian terbalik; As a continuation of the literary evaluation of
local budget socialization, the KPK has suggested

Pencegahan
Prevention
t Sistem administrasi kependudukan the Regional Parliaments produce Regional

dan catatan sipil masih buruk. Budget 2007 posters and post them up in
strategic places. This is because such a
Oleh karena itu, KPK akan terus mendorong
campaign greatly increases transparency, which
implementasi sistem DNT di Indonesia.
is very useful in the supervision of budget use.
d. Transparansi APBD:
From February until October 2007, the KPK
Sebagai kelanjutan atas kajian literatur delivered letters concerning the APBD 2007 Poster
terhadap sosialisasi APBD, KPK menyampaikan campaign to the following 94 DPRDs (Regional
saran kepada DPRD untuk membuat poster Parliaments): (a) 13 DPRD that attended
APBD 2007 dan menyeb ar k anny a d i the “DPRD Capacity and Role Improvement”
tem pat-tempat strategis. Pembuatan workshop; (b) 5 DPRD whose Regional Heads
poster APBD dan penyebarannya di have been investigated; (c) 22 DPRD in
tempat-tempat strategis merupakan salah Nanggroe Aceh Daroessalam; (d) 32 DPRD
satu cara untuk meningkatkan transparansi involved in the Island of Integrity program; (e)
ya ng berguna dalam p eng aw as an 7 DPRD in Banten; (f ) 5 DPRD in the Special
pel ak sanaan APBD. District of Yogyakarta; and (g) 10 DPRD in Riau.
Sejak Februari sampai Oktober 2007, KPK
telah menyampaikan surat perihal saran This APBD Poster suggestion has been met with
pembuatan poster APBD 2007 kepada 94 a positive response by various Regions, which
DPRD, yakni: (a) 13 DPRD yang telah mengikuti have sent letters informing the KPK that they
workshop ‘Meningkatkan Peran dan Kapasitas have produced such posters, the letters
DPRD’; (b) 5 DPRD yang petinggi Pemdanya included sample posters. These Regional
sudah disidik; (c) 22 DPRD di NAD; (d) 32 Parliaments involved are: (a) DPRD of Boalemo
DPRD yang termasuk dalam Island of Integrity; Regency; (b) DPRD of Cirebon City; (c) DPRD of
(e) 7 DPRD di Banten; (f ) 5 DPRD di Daerah Cilegon City; (d) DPRD of Nagan Raya Regency,
Istimewa Yogyakarta; dan (g) 10 DPRD di Riau. Aceh; (e) DPRD of Northern Aceh Regency, Aceh;
and (f ) DPRD of Sabang City, Aceh.
Saran pembuatan poster APBD ini telah
direspon oleh beberapa daerah dengan e. Database System for the State Owned
mengirimkan surat pemberitahuan telah Enterprises Ministry
membuat poster APBD kepada KPK berikut
contoh poster. Adapun daerah yang telah Learning from various corruption cases in the
mengirimkan contoh poster APBD 2007 past, most notoriously the BULOG case, the KPK
tersebut adalah: (a) DPRD Kab. Boalemo; (b) recommends that the SOE Ministry create a SOE
DPRD Kota Cirebon; (c) DPRD Kota Cilegon; Directors and Commissioners Database that
(d) DPRD Kabupaten Nagan Raya, NAD; (e) can ensure transparency as regards information
DPRD Kabupaten Aceh Utara, NAD; dan (e) pertaining to the personal wealth, personal
DPRD Kota Sabang, NAD. networks, and conflicts of interest of SOE
e. Sistem Database Meneg BUMN Directors and Commissioners. It is expected that
Belajar dari beberapa kasus tindak pidana this will help secure state investments in various
korupsi sebelumnya dan dipicu oleh kasus SOEs. It is hoped that through this approach,
BULOG, KPK memberikan rekomendasi kepada abuses of power and mismanagement will be
Menteri Negara BUMN untuk membuat sistem minimized.
database direksi dan komisaris BUMN y ang In June 2007, the KPK Commissioners and
da pat menjamin adanya transparansi representatives of the Directorate of Monitoring
informasi mengenai kek ayaan pribadi met with, and presented the aforementioned
(personal wealth), jejaring relasi pribadi suggestion to various officials of the SOE Ministry.
(personal networks), dan konflik These officials have committed themselves to the

Pencegahan
Prevention
k e pentingan (conflict of interest) dari creation of the database and have issued a
para Direksi dan Komisaris BUMN ataupun schedule for the implementation of the database’s
anak perusahaan BUMN. Rekomendasi development.
ini bertujuan untuk mengamankan investasi
negara dalam bentuk penyertaan modal
pemerintah dalam BUMN ini. Dengan
adanya transparansi dalam informasi-
informasi tersebut diharapkan kasus-kasus
salah urus (mismanagement) dan
penyalahgunaan kekuasaan dalam BUMN
bisa diminimalisasi.
Pada Juni 2007, KPK melakukan pertemuan

dan melakukan presentasi untuk
menyampaik an ide terseb ut k e pad a
beberapa pejabat terkait di Kementerian
BUMN. Pejabat di Kementerian BUMN
tersebut menyanggupi ide database ini dan
telah mengirimkan jadwal implementasi f. Formation of National Public Procurement
pembangunan database dimaksud. Office (NPPO)
In the World Bank’s 2001 “Country Procurement
f. Pembentukan National Public
Assesment Report” it was stated that one of the
Procurement Office (NPPO)
main weaknesses of the Government of Indonesia’s
Dalam Laporan Bank Dunia tahun 2001 procurement system is its lack of an agency that
“Country Procurement Assesment Report” has a mandate to formulate procurement policies
disebutkan bahwa salah satu kelemahan and to monitor compliance with such policies.
ut a ma sistem p engadaan peme r int ah
Indonesia adalah tidak adanya sebuah The formation of such an agency was commited
lembaga yang memiliki mandat untuk to by the Government as stated at the CGI Meeting
memformulasikan kebijakan serta memonitor in Tokyo in 2000. At that meeting, the Government
kepatuhan atas pelaksanaannya. stated that it would support the establishment of
Pembentukan lembaga ini sebenarnya telah NPPO through a new Government Procurement
menjadi k o m itmen pemer intah y ang Law.
di nyatakan dalam pertemuan dengan CGI
Presidential Decree No. 80 of 2003, article 50,
di Tokyo pada tahun 2000. Dalam pertemuan
provides that the development of policies
ini juga pemerintah menyatak an ak an
in respect of goods and services procurement
mendukung NPPO dalam merumuskan suatu
by the Govenrment is to be done by the LPKPP
undang-undang pengadaan pemerintah.
(Agency for the Development of Government
Keputusan Presiden Nomor 80 tahun
Procurement Policies), which was formed based
2003 Pasal 50 juga telah mengamanatkan
on another Presidential Decree issued on January
Pengembangan kebijak an pengadaan
1st 2005.
barang/jasa pemerintah dilakukan oleh
Lembaga Pengembangan Kebijak an At present, the commitment of the Government,
Pengadaan Pemerintah (LPKPP) yang as well as the aforementioned mandate, has not
pembentukannya ditetapkan dengan been fully acted upon. The mandated agency
Keputusan Presiden tersendiri (ayat 1) serta has transformed into the PPKPBJ (Center for the
lembaga ini sudah terbentuk paling lambat Development of Public Goods and Services
pada tanggal 1 Januari 2005 (ayat 2) Procurement Policies), which comes under the

Pencegahan
Prevention
Saat ini komitmen pemerintah serta amanat authority of the Principal Secretary to the Ministry
tersebut belum sepenuhnya dilaksanakan. of National Development Planning/Bappenas.
Lembaga yang diamanatk an ini telah Based on the KPK’s evaluation, the PPKPBJ, with
dibentuk sebagai Pusat Pengembangan its limited capabilities, will not be able to perform
Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Publik its functions optimally.
(PPKPBJ), yang berada di bawah Sekretaris In the interest of overhauling the national
Utama Kementerian Negara Perencanaan procurement system, the KPK is thus pushing for
Pembangunan N asio nal/B appe nas. the Government to enact a National Procurement
B e rd a s a r k a n k a j i a n y a n g d i l a k u k a n , Law as the basis for the establishment of the
disim pulk an bahwa PPKPBJ d e ng an
k eter b atasan k ap asitas yang dimilikinya
saat ini, masih belum dapat menjalankan
fungsi-fungsinya secara optimal.
Untuk itu dalam rangka perbaikan sistem

pengadaan nasional, KPK mendorong
pemerintah untuk segera merealisasikan
terwujudnya Undang-Undang Pengadaan
Nasional, sebagai dasar pembentukan
PPKPBJ serta tugas pokok dan fungsinya. PPKPBJ, as well as its core duties and functions.
Da lam masa transisi p er lu s e g e ra During the transition process, a Presidential
diter b itkan Peraturan Presiden yang regulation will be required governing the
mengatur pembentuk an, tugas pokok establishment, core duties and functions of the
dan fungsi PPKPBJ. PPKPBJ.
The KPK also suggests that there be a
KPK juga memberi saran untuk melakukan restructurization of the PPKPBJ’s organization and
restrukturisasi organisasi dan fungsi PPKPBJ. functions. The structure of the PPKPBJ must be able
Struktur yang dibentuk nantinya harus da- to per form the following core functions:
pat menjalankan fungsi-fungsi utama yaitu: formulating policies/standards/regulations;
memfo r mulasik an k eb ijak an /s t and ar/ supervising compliance of policies/standards/
regulasi, mengawasi k epatuhan at as regulations; educating related parties; and
kebijakan/ standar/ regulasi, mengedukasi distributing information/ policies/standards/
pihak-pihak yang terlibat, dan regulations.
m e n d i s t r i b u s i kannya. g. I m p o r t C l e a ra nce I nt e r- I ns t i t utio n a l
Coordination at Tanjung Priok Port
g. Koordinasi Antarinstansi Terkait Import
From the results of the examinations done on
Clearance di Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok
the DJBC’s Import Administration System, it was
Dari Kajian Sistem Administrasi Impor pada found that the responsibility for improving
DJBC, ditemukan bahwa tanggung jawab efficacy in the movement of goods does not lie
untuk meningkatkan kelancaran lalu lintas solely with the DJBC, but with all technical
barang bukan hanya terletak di pundak institutions related to the traffic of goods:
DJBC, melainkan seluruh instansi teknis t Directorate General of Maritime Transportation,
yang terkait dengan lalu lintas barang, at the Department of Transportation;
antara lain: t Administrators of Tanjung Priok Port.
t Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Laut, t PT (Persero) Pelabuhan Indonesia II.
Dep. Perhubungan RI. t Directorate General of International Trade, at
t Administrator Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok. the Department of Trade;
t PT (Persero) Pelabuhan Indonesia II. t Agriculture Quarantine Board, at the
t Direktorat Jenderal Perdagangan Luar Department of Agriculture;
Negeri, Dep. Perdagangan RI.

Pencegahan
Prevention
t Ba dan K arantina Per tanian, D e p. t Plant Quarantine Center at Tanjung Priok
Per tanian RI . Port (Department of Agriculture);
t Balai Besar Karantina Tumbuhan Pelabuhan t Class I Animal Quarantine Center at Tanjung
Tg. Priok, Dep. Pertanian RI. Priok Port (Department of Agriculture);
t Balai Karantina Hewan Kelas I Pelabuhan t Center for Fish/S eafood Quarantine
Tg. Priok, Dep. Pertanian RI. (Department of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries);
t Pusat Karantina Ikan, Dep. Kelautan dan t Fish/Seafood Quarantine Station at Tanjung
Perikanan RI. Priok Port (Department of Maritime Affairs
t Stasiun Karantina Ikan Pelabuhan Tg. Priok, and Fisheries);
Dep. Kelautan dan Perikanan RI. t Directorate General for Disease Control and
t D i re k to r a t J e n d e r a l Pe n g e n d a l i a n Environmental Health, at the Department of
Penyakit dan Penyehatan Lingkungan, Health;
Dep. Kesehatan RI. t Medicines and Foods Supervisory Board
t Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan (BPOM).
(BPOM). t Directorate General of Forest Protection and
t Direktorat Jenderal Perlindungan Hutan Nature Conservation, at the Department of
dan Konservasi Alam, Dep. Kehutanan RI. Forestry;
t Deputi Bidang Pengelolaan B3 dan t The Office of the Deputy Hazardous Waste
Limbah B3, Kemneg. Lingkungan Hidup. Management at the Environment Ministry;
t Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal t The Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM).
(BKPM). t The Highways Directorate General, at the
t D i re k t o r a t J e n d e r a l B i n a M a r g a , Department of Public Works(DGRI).
D e p a r t e m e n Pe k e r j a a n U m u m . t The Public Works Agency, DKI Jakarta Provincial
t Dinas Pek erjaan Umum, Pemprov Government.
DKI Jakarta.
Through its function as a trigger mechanism,
the KPK has taken the following steps:
Oleh karena itu, melalui trigger mechanism
1. Invited technical institutions involved in
KPK melakukan langkah-langkah sebagai
import clearance at Tanjung Priok Port to
berikut:
collectively search for a way of improving
1. Mengundang instansi-instansi teknis import services. This preliminary meeting
terkait import clearance di Pelabuhan was conducted on March 27th and April 3rd,
Tanjung Priok untuk bersama-sama 2007.
mencari solusi dalam perbaik an
2. Attended Joint Operation Board (JOB)
pelayanan Rapat awal ini dilaksanakan
Meetings held routinely each month at the
pada 27 Maret dan 3 April 2007.
Administrator’s Office, Main Dock, Tanjung
Priok. Participants in the JOB consist of
2. Mengikuti rapat JOB (Joint Operation
representatives of the institutions present at
Board) yang diadakan secara rutin set-
Tanjung Priok Port, including forwarders’
iap bulan di Kantor Administrator Pelabu-
associations, shipping associations,
han Utama Tanjung Priok. Peserta dalam
and dock workers’ unions. As of the present
JOB adalah perwakilan instansi-instansi
time, the KPK has attended 5 JOB Meetings.
yang ada di Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok, ter-
masuk juga asosiasi-asosiasi forwarder, 3. Held meetings with each institution involved
kapal, maupun tenaga kerja bongkar in import clearance at Tanjung Priok in order
muat. Sampai dengan saat ini KPK telah to discover the issues faced by each technical
mengikuti 5 (lima) Rapat JOB. institution so that the KPK will be able to
perform an ‘issues-mapping’ that can then
3. Melakukan pertemuan dengan masing- be used to formulate integrated suggestions
masing instansi terkait import clearance

Pencegahan
Prevention
di Tanjung Priok untuk mengetahui for improvements. As of October 31st, 2007,

permasalahan yang dihadapi setiap the KPK had attended meetings with the
instansi teknis sehingga KPK dapat following 7 institutions:
melakuk an pemetaan (mapping) t D i re c t ora t e Ge n e ra l of Mar itime
permasalahan untuk kemudian memberi Transportation, at the Department of
saran-saran perbaikan yang terintegrasi. Transportation.
Sampai dengan 31 Oktober 2007, KPK t PT (Persero) Pelabuhan Indonesia II.
telah melakukan pertemuan dengan 9 t Directorate General of International
(sembilan) instansi, yaitu: Trade, at the Department of Trade.
t Plant Quarantine Center at Tanjung Priok
t Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan
Port, (Department of Agriculture).
Laut, Dep. Perhubungan RI.
t Class I Animal Quarantine Center at
t PT (Persero) Pelabuhan Indonesia II.
Tanjung Priok Port, (Department of
t Direktorat Jenderal Perdagangan Luar
Agriculture).
Negeri, Dep. Perdagangan RI.
t Fish/S eafood Quarantine Center,
t Balai Besar Karantina Tumbuhan
(Department of Maritime Affairs and
Pelabuhan Tg. Priok, Dep. Pertanian RI.
Fisheries).
t Balai Karantina Hewan Kelas I Pelabuhan
t Medicines and Foods Supervisory Board
Tg. Priok, Dep. Pertanian RI.
(BPOM).
t Pusat Karantina Ikan, Dep. Kelautan
t The Public Works Directorate General, at
dan Perikanan RI.
the Department of Public Works(DGRI).
t Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Ma-
t The Public Works Agency, DKI Jakarta
k anan (BPOM).
Provincial Government.
t Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga,
4. Meetings with technical institutions to identify
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum.
the preparedness of each institution in
t Dinas Pekerjaan Umum, Pemprov
implementing the National Single Window
DKI Jakarta.
(NSW ) program, especially institutions
included in the NSW pilot project at Tanjung
4. Pertemuan dengan instansi teknis untuk
Priok Port. This NSW Pilot Project was intended
mengetahui kesiapan setiap instansi
to be an expression of Indonesia’s commitment
dalam pelaksanaan program National
to complying with the ASEAN Single Window
Single Window (NSW), khususnya instansi
program. The NSW System is hoped to increase
yang termasuk dalam pilot project NSW di
the efficiency of the flow of goods significantly
Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok. Pilot project NSW
because the NSW is a combination of the Port
ini merupakan bentuk awal pelaksanaan
System (improvements to the flow of goods at
komitmen Indonesia dalam pemenuhan
docks) and the Trade System (improvements in
The ASEAN Single Window. Sistem NSW
the flow of document processing), which
diharapk an dapat meningk atk an
functions to facilitate the forwarding of
kelancaran arus barang secara signifikan
standard information used in resolving all
karena NSW adalah perpaduan antara
prerequisites and requirements, as well as
Port System (percepatan fisik arus barang
all activities related to the efficient flow of
di p e l a b u h a n ) d a n Tr a d e S y s t e m
imports, exports, and transit goods as part of
(percepatan sisi penanganan dokumen),
the effort to enhance national competitiveness
yang ber fungsi untuk memfasilitasi
on the global market.
pengajuan info r m asi standar g u na
menyelesaik an semua pemenuhan On November 19th, 2007, the Indonesian
persyaratan dan ketentuan, serta semua NSW program had its ‘soft launch’ on its
kegiatan yang terkait dengan kelancaran website (http://www.nsw.or.id). According
arus barang ekspor, impor, transit, dalam to the current plan, the official launch is set
rangka meningkatkan daya saing nasional. to be held on December 17th, 2007. In early

Pencegahan
Prevention
January 2008, the NSW portal will be ready

Pada 19 November 2007 lalu telah for use (in a limited fashion) to provide public
dilakukan soft launch Indonesia NSW service facilities for the export-import trade.
dengan alamat http://www.nsw.or.id.
Sesuai dengan rencana maka peresmian
secara resmi akan dilakukan pada 17
Desember 2007 dan mulai awal Januari
2008 por tal NSW sudah digunak an
(secara terbatas) untuk menyediakan
fasilitas layanan publik dalam kegiatan
ekspor impor.
3. Pemantauan
Pemantauan adalah kegiatan yang dilakukan
untuk mendorong implementasi rekomendasi
KPK. Kegiatan pemantauan dilakukan setelah
KPK selesai melakukan pengkajian sistem di
3. Monitoring/Oversight
suatu lembaga negara dan pemerintah.
Monitoring covers activities conducted in order to ensure
Sejak 1 Januari sampai 31 Oktober 2007, KPK the implementation of the KPK’s recom¬mendations.
telah melakuk an kegiatan pemantauan Monitoring by the KPK is conducted after evalutions
implementasi rekomendasi di instansi berikut: are made on State/Government agencies.
a. BPN (Kantor Pertanahan)
Between January 1st and October 31st of 2007, the
K egia tan pemantauan implem e nt as i
KPK has conducted various monitoring activities to
rekomendasi di Kantor Pertanahan yang
ascertain whether its recommendations have been
dilakuk an pada tahun 2007 merupak an
imple¬mented:
kelanjutan dari kegiatan yang sama yang
a. At the BPN (National Land Board)
dilakukan pada tahun 2006. Sejak Januari
Monitoring as regards the implementation of
sampai akhir 31 Oktober 2007 telah dilakukan
recommendations at BPN offices was conducted in
kegiatan pemantauan di 4 (empat) kantor
2007 as follow-up to monitoring in 2006. Between
pertanahan, yaitu: (a) Kantor Pertanahan
January 1st and October 31st of 2007, monitoring
Jakarta Utara; (b) Kantor Pertanahan Jakarta
was conducted at the NLB offices in (a) North
Selatan; (c) Kantor Pertanahan Jakarta Barat;
Jakarta; (b) South Jakarta; (c) West Jakarta; and (d)
dan (d) Kantor Pertanahan Jakarta Pusat.
Central Jakarta.
Dari beberapa kali kegiatan pemantauan
yang dilakukan diketahui bahwa praktik Based on the monitoring conducted, the KPK
korupsi dalam bentuk suap dan pungli masih found that corrupt conduct was occurring in the
marak terjadi dalam pelayanan pertanahan. form of bribery and illicit fee-collecting in NLB
Berdasarkan temuan ini, langkah selanjutnya offices.
yang akan dilakukan adalah:
Based on these findings, the next steps to be
t Melakukan pertemuan dengan Kepala taken will be:
BPN dan Tim Reformasi BPN pada akhir
t holding meetings with the Head of the BPN
tahun 2007. Untuk pertemuan tersebut
and the BPN Reform Team at the end of 2007.
telah disiapk an materi presentasi
At this meeting, materials will be presented
mengenai hasil p em antauan d an
on the findings of KPK monitoring, as well as
beberapa bukti yang menunjukan tentang
evidence showing how common bribery
maraknya praktik suap dan pungli.
and illicit fee-collection are.
t Meminta Kepala BPN dan Tim Reformasi

Pencegahan
Prevention
BPN untuk mengambil langkah-langkah t Requesting the Head of the BPN and the
yang diperlukan. BPN Reform Team to take the necessary
steps.
b. Direktorat Jenderal Imigrasi (Kantor b. Directorate General of Immigration
Imigrasi)
Following the evaluation of the immigration services
Sebagai tindak lanjut pengkajian sistem
system in immigration offices, in 2006 and 2007
pelayanan keimigrasian di kantor imigrasi, pada
the KPK conducted monitoring as regards the
tahun 2006 dan 2007 KPK telah melakukan
implementation of recommendations.
k egiatan pemantauan im ple m e nt as i
rek o mendasi.
Between January 1st, 2007 and October 31st,
Sejak 1 Januari 2007 sampai dengan 31 2007, the KPK has conducted 15 observations
Oktober 2007 KPK telah melakukan 15 (lima of 5 immigration offices in the DKI Jakarta and
belas) kali observasi di 5 Kantor Imigrasi di Tangerang area.
wilayah DKI Jakarta dan Tangerang. Dari pe-
mantauan yang dilakukan oleh KPK pada During observations conducted by the KPK in 2007,
tahun 2007 diketahui bahwa telah terdapat it was found that there have been efforts made to
upaya perbaikan sistem, terutama di Kantor improve the system, especially in the West Jakarta
Imigrasi Jakarata Barat, tempat dimana KPK immigration office, where the KPK conducted field
melakukan kajian lapangan (field review). reviews. However, illicit fee-collection is still
Meskipun demikian, praktik pungli masih common at all immigration offices, but especially
marak terjadi di semua kantor imigrasi, the South Jakarta immigration office.
terutama Kantor Imigrasi Jakarta Selatan.
c. Directorate General of Customs and Excise
c. Ditjen Bea Cukai
Berdasarkan action plan yang disusun oleh Based on the action plan devised by the DJBC, the
DJBC, KPK melak uk an pemantauan KPK has conducted as regards the implementation
implementasi rekomendasi. Meskipun of recommendations. The results showed that
beberapa perbaikan sistem telah although several system improvements have bee
d i i m p l e m e n tasikan, dari pemantauan ini made, illicit fee-collecting is still common at
diketahui bahwa pungutan-pungutan liar Tanjung Priok Port, and this was being done
masih terjadi di Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok dan blatantly.
dilakukan secara terang-terangan.
d. BNP2TKI d. BNP2TKI
Sebagai kelanjutan atas kegiatan pengkajian
As a follow-up on its evaluation of the migrant
sistem penempatan TKI, KPK telah meminta
worker placement system, the KPK has asked the
BNP2TKI untuk menyusun action plan atas
BNP2TKI to devise an action plan based on the
rekomendasi perbaik an sistem yang
system-im¬provement recommendations made by
disampaik an KPK.
the KPK.
Action plan tersebut telah disusun oleh
The Action Plan was received by the KPK on October
BNP2TKI dan diterima oleh KPK pada
27th, 2007. As follow-up, the KPK will conduct
tanggal 29 Oktober 2007. Selanjutnya KPK
monitoring on the implementaton of
akan melakukan kegiatan pemantauan
recommendations based on the action plan.
implementasi rekomendasi berdasarkan
action plan tersebut.

Pencegahan
Prevention
Pengembangan Jaringan Kerjasama
1. Kerjasama Nasional dan Daerah

Dalam upaya pemberantasan TPK, KPK
menggalang kerja sama dengan segenap unsur
masyarakat dan pemerintahan. Sampai bulan
November 2007, berbagai kerja sama yang
telah digalang di antaranya:
a. Pembentuk an Kerjasama dengan

Lembaga Pen di di k an
Development of Cooperative Networks
Tujuan utama kerjasama dengan lembaga
1. Cooperation between Central and Regional
pendidikan adalah dalam rangka
Governments
mengoptimalkan dan menggalang
dukungan civitas akademika dalam
In the effort to eradicate corruption, the KPK
upaya penelitian dan pengembangan,
encourages cooperation from all elements of
kampanye anti korupsi dan pendidikan anti
society and the Government. As of November 2007,
korupsi, sampai dengan saat ini telah
various cooperations efforts had been undertaken:
terbentuk kerjasama dengan 62 (enam puluh
dua) lembaga pendidikan tinggi, yaitu: (1)
a. Cooperation with Educational Institutions
Sekolah Tinggi Akuntansi Negara (STAN),
The main purpose of engaging in cooperation
Tangerang; (2) Universitas Udayana (UNUD),
with educational institutions is the optimization
Denpasar; (3) Universitas Andalas (UNAND),
and rallying of support for research and
Padang; (4) Universitas Islam Riau (UIR),
development work, as well as anti-corruption
Pekanbaru; (5) Universitas Riau (UNRI),
campaigning and education.
Pekanbaru; (6) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(UNNES), Semarang; (7) Universitas Islam
Currently, the KPK cooperates with 62 (sixty-two)
Negeri (UIN), Jak ar ta; (8) Universitas
universities: (1) Sekolah Tinggi Akuntansi Negara
Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan; (9)
(STAN – an Accounting University), Tangerang;
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (UNLAM),
(2) Universitas Udayana (UNUD), Denpasar; (3)
Banjarmasin; (10) UNIKA Soegiyo Panoto,
U n i ve r si t a s A n d a l a s (U N A N D), Pa d ang;
Semarang; (11) Universitas Riau Kepulauan
(4) Universitas Islam Riau (UIR – an Islamic
(UNRIKA), Batam; (12) Universitas Gadjah
University), Pekanbaru; (5) Universitas Riau
M a da (UG M), Yo gyak ar ta; (13 ) I A I N
(UNRI), Pekanbaru; (6) Universitas Negeri
Antasari Banjarmasin; (14) Universitas Syiah
Semarang (UNNES), Semarang; (7) Universitas
Kuala (UNSYIAH), Banda Aceh; (15) IAIN
Islam Negeri (UIN – Islamic University), Jakarta; (8)
Ar-Raniry – Banda Aceh; (16) Universitas Bung
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU – Islamic
Hatta (UBH), Padang; (17) Universitas Negeri
University), Medan; (9) Universitas Lambung
Padang (UNP), Padang; (18) Universitas
Mangkurat (UNLAM), Banjarmasin; (10) UNIK A
Ek asakti (UNES), Padang; (19) Kwar tir
Soegiyo Panoto, Semarang; (11) Universitas Riau
Nasional Gerakan Pramuka; (20) Universit as
Kepulauan (UNRIKA), Batam; ( 1 2 ) U n i v e r s i t a s
M u h a m m a d i y a h ( U M Y ) , Yogyakarta; (21)
G a d j a h M a d a ( U G M ) , Yogyakarta; (13)
Universitas Palangkaraya; (22) Yayasan Bina
IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin; (14) Universitas
Nusantara; (23) Institut Teknologi Bandung
Syiah Kuala (UNSYIAH), Banda Aceh; (15) IAIN
(ITB), Bandung; (24) Universitas Katolik
Ar-Raniry – Banda Aceh; (16) Universitas Bung
Parahyangan (Unpar), Bandung;
Hatta (UBH), Padang; (17) Universitas Negeri
(25) Universitas Pasundan (U npas ),
Padang (UNP), Padang; (18) Universitas
Bandung; (26) Universitas Islam Bandung
Ekasakti (UNES), Padang; (19) Kwartir Nasional
(Unisba), Bandung; (27) Universitas Padjajaran

Pencegahan
Prevention
(Unpad), Bandung; (28) UIN Sunan Gunung Gerakan Pramuka (Scouting Movement); (20)
Jati – Bandung; (29) Universitas Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah (UMY), Yogyakarta;
Indonesia (UPI), Bandung; (30) Universitas (21) Universitas Palangkaraya; (22) Yayasan
Cendrawasih (Uncen), Jayapura; Bina Nusantara; (23) Institut Teknologi Bandung
(31) Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; (32) (ITB – the Bandung Institute of Technology),
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Malang; (33) Bandung; (24) Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Universitas Brawijaya (UNIBRAW) Malang; (Unpar – a Catholic University), Bandung; (25)
(34) Universitas Muhamadiyah Malang Universitas Pasundan (Unpas), Bandung; (26)
(UMM); (35) IAIN Sumatera Utara, Medan; Universitas Islam Bandung (Unisba – an Islamic
(36) Universitas Surabaya (UBAYA); (37) University), Bandung; (27) Universitas Padjajaran
Universitas Airlangga (UNAIR) Surabaya; (Unpad), Bandung; (28) UIN Sunan Gunung Jati
(38) Institut Teknologi Surabaya (ITS); (39) IAIN – B a n d u n g ; ( 2 9 ) U n i v e r s i t a s Pe n d i d i k a n
Sunan Ampel Surabaya; (40) Univers it as Indonesia (UPI), Bandung; (30) Universitas
Ha s anuddin (UNHAS) M ak as s ar ; (41) Cendrawasih (Uncen), Jayapura; (31)
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Alauddin Universitas Pattimura, A mbon; (32)
Makassar; (42) Universitas Negeri Makassar Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Malang; (33)
(UNM); (43) Universitas Muhammadiyah Universitas Brawijaya (UNIBRAW) Malang; (34)
(UNISMUH) Makassar; (44) Universitas “45” Universitas Muhamadiyah Malang (UMM); (35)
(U-45) Makassar; (45) Universitas Muslim IAIN Sumatera Utara, Medan; (36) Universitas
Indonesia (UMI) Makassar; (46) Sekolah Tinggi Surabaya (UBAYA); (37) Universitas Airlangga
Administrasi Negara Lembaga Administrasi (UNAIR) Surabaya; (38) Institut Teknologi
Negara (STIA-LAN) Makassar; (47) Universitas Surabaya (ITS – the Surabaya Institute of
Tanjungpura Pontianak; (48) Universitas Islam Technology); (39) IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya;
Indonesia (UII), Yogyakarta; (49) Universitas (40) Universitas Hasanuddin (UNHAS) Makassar;
17 Agustus 1945 (UNTAG), Semarang; (50) (41) Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN – an Islamic
Universitas Mataram (UNRAM); (51) IAIN University) Makassar (UNM); (43) Universitas
Mataram; (52) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Hindu Muhammadiyah (UNISMUH) Makassar; (44)
Negeri Mataram (STAHN) Mataram; (53) Universitas “45” (U-45) Makassar; (45) Universitas
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo (UNG); Muslim Indonesia (UMI – An Islamic
(54) U n i ve r s i t a s G o ro n t a l o ( U G ) ; ( 5 5 ) University) Makassar; (46) Sekolah Tinggi
Universitas Sam Ratulangi (Unsrat), Manado; Administrasi Negara Lembaga Administrasi
(56) Universitas Jambi; (57) IAIN Sulthan Negara (STIA-LAN – State Administration
Thaha Saifuddin Jambi; (58) Universitas College (run by the State Administration
Sahid Jakarta; (59) Universitas Muhamadiyah Institute) Makassar; (47) Universitas Tanjungpura
Magelang; (60) Universitas Sriwijaya; (61) IAIN Pontianak; (48) Universitas Islam Indonesia
Raden Fatah Palembang; dan (62) Universitas (UII – An Islamic University), Yogyakarta;
Kristen Satya Wacana. (49) Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 (UNTAG),
Semarang; (50) Universitas Mataram (UNRAM);
b. Pembentukan Kerjasama dengan Instansi (51) IAIN Mataram; (52) Sekolah Tinggi Agama
Pemerintahan, Institusi Swasta, dan LSM Hindu Negeri Mataram (STAHN – a Hindu
University) Mataram; (53) Universitas Negeri
Dalam rangka memudahkan pelaksanaan
Gorontalo (UNG); (54) Universitas Gorontalo
amanat sebagaimana tercantum dalam
(UG); (55) Universitas Sam Ratulangi (Unsrat),
Undang-Undang, KPK dituntut mampu
Manado; (56) Universitas Jambi; (57) IAIN Sulthan
Thaha Saifuddin Jambi; (58) Universitas Sahid
Jakarta; (59) Universitas Muhamadiyah Magelang;
(60) Universitas Sriwijaya; (61) IAIN Raden Fatah
Palembang; and (62) Universitas Kristen Satya
Wacana (a Christian University).

Pencegahan
Prevention
b. Forging Cooperation with Government

Institutions, Private Institutions, and
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
In the course of facilitating the implementation
of the KPK’s legislative mandate, our Commission
is obligated to engage in cooperation with
institutions from various spheres in Indonesia. The
governmental, private, and non-governmental
entities that have signed Memorandums
of Understanding committing them to cooperate
untuk melakukan bekerjasama dengan with the KPK are: (1) PPATK ( The Indonesian
lembaga lain. Lembaga-lembaga yang telah Financial Intelligence Unit) ; (2) The Ministry of
bekerjasama dengan KPK yang terikat melalui Communications and Information; (3) The State
kesepakatan kerjasama formal (MoU) meliputi Ministry of Administrative Reform; (4) Java Post
Instansi Pemerintahan, Institusi Swasta (news¬paper); (5) The 2004 Corruption Eradication
dan LSM, yaitu: (1) PPATK; (2) Kementerian Monitoring Forum; (6) Governors of 33 Provinces;
Komunikasi dan Informasi; (3) Kementerian (7) The Inspectorate General of the Depart¬ment
Negara PAN; (4) Jawa Pos; (5) Forum Pemantau of Finance; (8) The Directorate General of Taxation;
Pemberantasan Korupsi 2004; (6) Gubernur 33 (9) Telecommunications service providers; (10) The
Provinsi; (7) Inspektorat Jenderal Departemen Police; (11) TNI (Army HQ); (12) The National Land
Keuangan; (8) Direktorat Jenderal Agency (BPN); (13) The Attorney General’s Office;
Pa ja k ; (9) Penyedia Jasa Telekomunikasi; (10) (14) The Competition Monitoring Commission
Kepolisian RI; (11) Mabes TNI; (12) BPN; (13) (KPPU); (15) The Regional Representatives Assembly;
Kejaksaan Agung; (14) KPPU; (15) DPD; (16) (16) The SOE Ministry; (17) The State Audit Board;
Meneg BUMN; (17) BPK; (18) Lemhanas; (19) (18) Lemhanas – the National Defence Agency;(19)
Bank Indonesia; (20) Bapepam LK; (21) Kwartir Bank Indonesia; (20) Bapepam (Capital Market
Pramuka; (22) Komisi Yudisial; (23) BPKP; (24) Oversight Agency); (21) Kwartir Pramuka (Scouting
Dirjen Bea dan Cukai; (25) Departemen Dalam Organization); (22) The Judicial Commission; (23)
Negeri; (26) Lembaga Permasyarakatan; (27) The Finance and Development Audit Board; (24)
Lembaga Sandi Negara; (28) Dewan Pers; The Directorate General of Customs and Excise; (25)
(29) Departemen Luar Negeri; (30) ICMI (31) The Depar tment of Defence; and (26) The
D e p a r t e m e n Pe r t a h a n a n ; d a n ( 3 2 ) Department of Religious Affairs.
D e pa r tem en Agama.
c. Promoting Cooperation
c. Kegiatan Pembinaan Kerjasama Aside from cultivating cooperation in the form of
Selain menjalin kerjasama yang dituangkan cooperation agreements, the KPK also attempts to
dalam bentuk perjanjian kerjasama, KPK maintain, improve, and manage cooperative net-
berusaha untuk memelihara, meningkatkan, works that have been formed through the follow-
dan mengelola jaringan kerjasama yang ing promotional activities:
telah dibentuk dengan melakukan kegiatan- r "MM *OEPOFTJB 1SPWJODJBM 8PSLJOH (SPVQ
kegiatan pembinaan jaringan sebagai berikut: Coordinating Meetings and Evaluations, April 12th,
t Rapat Koordinasi dan Evaluasi Pokja 2007.
Provinsi se-Indonesia, 12 April 2007. r 8PSLTIPQPO&EVDBUJPOBOE-PDBM7BMVFT 1BEBOH
t Workshop Pendidikan dan Nilai-nilai Lokal, August 10th, 2007.
di Padang, 10 Agustus 2007. r 8PSLJOH WJTJUT UP *NQSPWF DPNQMJBODF BOE
t Kunjungan Kerja Peningkatan Kepatuhan socialization of LHKPN and gratuity reports,
dan Sosialisasi LHKPN dan Gratifikasi, di held in the following Provinces: (a) Banten; (b)

Pencegahan
Prevention
provinsi: (a) Banten; (b) Jabar; (c) Jakarta; (d) West Java; (c) Jakarta; (d) Special District of
DI Yogyakarta; (e) Jatim; dan (f ) Jateng. Jogjakarta; (e) East Java; and (f ) Central Java.
t Workshop peningkatan kapasitas internal r 8PSLTIPQ UP JNQSPWF UIF ,1,T JOUFSOBM DBQBDJUZ
KPK dengan: (a) KSEI; (b) Perbankan; (c) with: (a) KSEI; (b) banking institutions; (c) the
POLRI; (d) Departemen Perdagangan; (e) Police; (d) The Department of Trade; (e) Authorities
Tindak pidana perbankan; (f ) Perpajakan; concerned with Banking Crimes; (f ) Taxation
(g) Intelijen Kriminal; dan (h) Proaktif authorities; (g) Intelligence authorities dealing with
Investigasi. crime ; and (h) Authorities concerned with the KPK’s
t Workshop pembahasan kerjasama dengan: ability to conduct proactive investigations.
(a) Departemen Agama, (b) Departemen r 8PSLTIPQPODPPQFSBUJPOQPTTJCJMJUJFTXJUI B

Pertahanan; dan (c) Depkumham. the Department of Religious Affairs, (b) the
t Konferensi Nasional Pemberantasan Department of Defence; and (c) the Department
Korupsi 2007. Konferensi tahunan dengan of Law and Human Rights.
sub tema “Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas r /BUJPOBM $PSSVQUJPO &SBEJDBUJPO $POGFSFODF
Penyelenggaraan Negara” ini diseleng- 2007. The KPK organizes annual conferences;
garakan di Jakarta pada 4-5 Desember this year the theme was “Transparency and
2007 dengan tujuan melaporkan kepada Accountability in State Governance”, and the
publik perkembangan pemberantasan conference was held at the Jakarta Convention
korupsi yang telah dilakukan lembaga Centre on December the 4th and 5th of 2007.
pemerintah berdasarkan tupoksi The purpose of holding annual conferences is
masing-masing, baik dari segi penindakan so that the public could be informed of progresses
maupun pencegahan. Kurang lebih 49 made in corruption prevention and repression by
lembaga mempresentasikan laporan government agencies in their respective fields. 49
pemberantasan korupsi, dan 32 diantaranya agencies presented reports, 32 of which
memaparkannya dalam konferensi ini. elaborated further on their methods and
Konferensi yang dihadiri 200 peserta ini, experiences. The conference was attended by 200
dibuka oleh Ketua MPR dan ditutup oleh participants, and was opened by the Chairman of
Wakil Presiden. Konferensi ini mejadi wadah the People’s Consultative Assembly, and closed
dan sarana yang penting bagi bangsa by the Vice President. The KPK maintains that the
Indonesia untuk berkoordinasi dalam conference is an important annual event that
upaya-upaya lembaga negara dalam facilitates national coordination in the form
berkontribusi bagi pemberantasan korupsi of the efforts made by government agencies in
di Indonesia. contributing to the Indonesian anti-corruption
effort.
2. Kerjasama Internasional 2. International Cooperation
Sebagaimana tertuang dalam Konvensi PBB Me- As emphasized in the UN Convention against
nentang Korupsi (UNCAC) bahwa kerjasama in- Corruption (UNCAC), international cooperation is an
ternasional adalah bagian yang sangat penting important part of corruption eradication efforts. The
dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Konvensi UN Convention on Transnational Organized Crime
PBB yang lain tentang kejahatan lintas negara (UNTOC ) also stresses that corruption is a
yang terorganisir (United Nations on Transna- transnational crime that needs to be properly and
tional Organized Crimes, UNTOC) juga menyata- sternly addressed. In reality, corruptors tend to move
kan bahwa korupsi adalah salah satu kejahatan either themselves or their assets to foreign jurisdictions
lintas negara. Fakta di lapangan menunjukkan to escape law enforcement in their original countries.
pula bahwa koruptor cenderung dan merasa Based on the aforementioned international
aman untuk melarik an diri dan menyimpan conventions, as well as the reality that corruptors
aset hasil korupsinya di luar negeri. L a n d a s a n transfer their criminal proceeds abroad, the KPK must
h u k u m i n t e r n a s i o n a l d a n kecenderungan be able to strengthen Indonesia’s capacity in respect
fakta di lapangan ini, menjadikan alasan utama

Pencegahan
Prevention
of international cooperation in order to ensure that

its corruption eradication efforts in Indonesia can
be optimized.
The scope of international cooperation in the KPK

covers all efforts to support the prevention and
repression of corrupt activity. International
activities that support our prevention efforts
include the facilitation of international meetings,
seminars, workshops, and conferences; the
d e v e l o p m e n t o f b i l a t e ra l a n d m u l t i l a t e ra l
KPK untuk sesegera mungkin untuk memperkuat cooperation networks through the signing of
kerjasama internasional dalam memaksimalkan MOUs and international agreements; attending
hasil pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. international forums in other countries; capacity
building cooperation; advocacy efforts, coalition-
Ruang lingkup kerjasama internasional di KPK building, and negotiations with donor institutions
meliputi upaya-upaya untuk mendukung and countries. International activities that support
pencegahan dan penindakan k orupsi. repression efforts include mutual legal assistance;
K egiatan internasional dalam mendukung extradition; and the tracing and recovery of stolen
pencegahan adalah penyelenggaraan kegiatan assets and corruption proceeds.
internasional (meeting, seminar, workshop,
k onferensi), pengem bangan jar ing an
kerjasama bilateral dan multilateral (MoU, a. Development of Bilateral and Multilateral
perjanjian internasional), kehadiran dalam forum- Cooperation Networks
forum internasional, capacity building, advokasi,
The KPK has signed formal Memoranda
koalisi dan upaya dalam penggalangan donor.
of Understanding for bilateral and multilateral
Sedangkan kegiatan internasional dalam upaya
cooperation with the following foreign anti-
mendukung kegiatan penindakan meliputi
corruption agencies: (1) The Ministry of
kerjasama bantuan hukum timbal balik antar
Supervision of the People’s Republic of China; (2)
negara (Mutual Legal Assistance, MLA), ekstradisi
The Korean Independent Commission Against
(ex t ra d i t i o n ) dan upaya penc ar ian d an
Corruption (KICAC); (3) The Nigerian Economic
pengembalian asset hasil kejahatan korupsi di
and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC); (4)
luar negeri (Asset Tracing and Recovery).
The Vietnamese Inspectorate General of its Anti-
Corruption Commission Steering Group; (5) The
a. Pengembangan Jaringan Kerjasama
Brunei Darussalam Corruption Prevention
Bilateral dan Multilateral
Agency (Badan Mencegah Rasuah - BMR); (6)
Berbagai kerja sama bilateral dan multilateral The Malaysian Corruption Prevention Agency
yang telah digalang dalam bentuk (Badan Pencegah Rasuah - BPR); (7) The Singa-
kesepakatan kerjasama formal (MOU) dengan porean Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau
lembaga anti korupsi luar negeri diantaranya (CPIB); (8) The Thailand National Counter
adalah: (1) Kementerian Supervisi (Ministry of Corruption Commission (NCCC ); (9) The
Supervision) Republik Rakyat Cina; (2) KICAC Inspectorate General of Cambodia; (10) The
(Korea Independent Commission against Phillipine Ombudsman Agency; and (11) The
Co rruption) K o re a S e l a t a n ; ( 3 ) E F CC State Inspection Organization of the Islamic
(Economic and Financial Crimes Commission) Republic of Iran.
Nigeria; (4) Inspektorat Jenderal (Anti
Corruption Commission Steering Group) The foreign anti-corruption agencies with which
Vietnam; (5) BMR (Badan Memcegah Rasuah) the KPK cooperates with, but with which it has
Brunei Darussalam; (6) BPR (Badan Pencegah no formal bilateral or multilateral cooperation

Pencegahan
Prevention
Rasuah) Malaysia; (7) CPIB (Corrupt Practices agreements, include: the Hong Kong Independent
Investigation Bureau) Singapura; (8) NCCC Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) SAR
(National Counter Corruption Commission) unit; (2) The Australian Federal Police; (3)
Thailand; (9) Inspektorat Jenderal Cambodia; The Department of Investigations and
(10) Badan Ombudsman Philipina; dan (11) Pr o s e c u t i o n s o f t h e Fe d e ra l R e p u b l i c o f
I n p e k to r a t J e n d e r a l (State Inspection Germany; (4) The Thailand Department of
Oragnization) Republik Islam Iran. Special Investigation; (5) The United States FBI
and Department of Justice; (6) The Switzerland
Adapun lembaga penegak hukum dan anti Federal Department of Justice; (7) The European
korupsi luar negeri yang telah bekerjasama, Union OLAF; (8) The Timor Leste Provedor; (9)
namun tidak terikat dalam kesepakatan The Bhutan Anti-Corruption Commission; and
kerjasama formal secara bilateral maupun (10) The Singapore Attorney General’s Office.
multilateral, antara lain dengan: (1) ICAC
Hongkong SAR; (2) AFP Australia; (3) The KPK has also developed cooperation in the
Departemen Investigasi dan Kejaksaan form of multilateral forums in 2007 with: (1)
Republik Federal Jerman; (4) Department The IAACA (International Association of
of Special Investigation Thailand; (5) FBI dan Anti Corruption Authorities); (2) The APEC Anti
Department of Justice United States; (6) Corruption Task Force; (3) The ADB/OECD Anti
Federal Department of Justice Switzerlands; Corruption Initiative; (4) The Anti Corruption
(7) OLAF Uni Eropa; (8) Provedor Timor Leste; Authorities Forum; (5) The ASEAN Multilateral
(9) Anti Corruption Commission Bhutan; dan Cooperation on Anti-Corruptio (8 members);
(10) Kejaksaan Singapura. (6) The ASEAN Senior Officials Meeting on
Transnational Crimes; (7) Interpol; (8) The APG/
Pengembangan jaringan kerjasama dalam FATF Forum; (9) The Expert Working Group on
forum Multilateral yang dilakukan KPK pada Asset Recovery; (10) The OKI (Organization of
ta hun 2007 yak ni dengan: ( 1) I A ACA the Islamic Conference); (11) anti-corruption
(International Association of Anti Corruption and enhancing national integrity forums; and
Authorities); (2) APEC Anti Corruption Task (12) anti corruption networks.
Fo rce; (3) ADB/OE CD A nti Cor r up t i on
I n nitiative; (4) Anti Corruption Authorities b. International Activities
(ACA) Fo rum ; (5) A SEAN Multilateral
In 2007, Indonesia hosted seven major events
Cooperation on Anti Corruption (8 negara);
related to the international corruption
(6) ASEAN SOMTC (Senior Official Meeting
eradication effort, four or which were organized
on Transanational Crimes); (7) Interpol; (8)
by the KPK:
APG/FATF Forum; (9) Expert Working Group on
Asset Recovery; (10) OKI (Organisasi Konfenesi t 5IF "4&"/ &YQFS U .FFUJOH PO "OUJ
Islam); (11) Anti-Corruption and Enhancing Corruption. This Exper t Meeting was
National Integrity; dan (12) Anti Corruption o rg a n i z e d i n c o o p e ra t i o n w i t h t h e
Networks. Secretariat of ASEAN and NCB Interpol on
May 1st and 2nd, 2007, in Jakarta. This KPK-
b. Penyelenggaraan Kegiatan Internasional organized event was held as part of the effort
to make the ASEAN countries more vigilant
Selama tahun 2007, tidak kurang tujuh event
against corruption as a transnational crime.
besar kegiatan internasional pemberantasan
A total of ten ASEAN country representatives
korupsi diselenggarakan, empat diantaranya
and UNODC representatives attended this
diselenggarakan oleh KPK, yaitu:
event.
t ASE AN- E x p e r t M e e t i n g o n A n t i
Corruption. Kegiatan ini diselengg arak an
atas kerjasama Sekretariat ASEAN dan NCB
Interpol pada 1-2 Mei 2007 di Jakarta.

Pencegahan
Prevention
Kegiatan atas prakarsa KPK ini dalam t 5IF *OUFSOBUJPOBM 4FNJOBS PO w$POGMJDU
rangka memperjuangkan kejahatan of Interest’. This high profile international
korupsi sebagai area kejahatan lintas seminar on Conflict of Interest, which was
negara yang dikerjasamakan dalam forum opened by President Susilo Bambang
ASEAN. Selain dihadiri 10 negara ASEAN, Yudhoyono at the State Palace, was held on
juga hadir dalam kegiatan ini perw a k il an August 6th - 7th, 2007, with assistance from
U NODC. various donors, including the ADB/OECD
Anti Corruption Inntiative, the Canadian
CIDA, the Danish Danida, the World Bank,
FSVC/USAID, the British Embassy, and the
Indonesian Department of Foreign Affairs.
The seminar focused on the importance of
a sense of awareness among law enforcers
that conflict of interest is a fundamental
aspect of corruption crimes, and
frequently involves government officials in
Indonesia and abroad. The conference was
attended by 200 participants from 29
countries, and hosted 35 expert speakers
from all over the globe. It was closed by
t Seminar Internasional ”Conflict of the Speaker of the People’s Consultative
Interest’. High Profile International Seminar Assembly (MPR), Dr. Hidayat Nur Wahid. The
on Conflict of Interest yang dibuka seminar recognized that conflict of interest
Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono issues must be resolved systemically as part
di Istana Negara ini dilaksanakan pada of the anti-corruption effort.
tanggal 6-7 Agustus 2007 atas kerjasama
dengan berbagai donor, seperti ADB/OECD t th Steering Group Meeting of ADB/OECD
Anti Corruption Inntiative, CIDA, Danida, Anti Corruption Innitiatives for Asia and
World Bank, FSVC/USAID, dan Kedutaan the Pasific. The ADB and the OECD again
Inggris. Seminar ini mengupas penting- bestowed the honor on the KPK of
nya perhatian penegak hukum dalam hosting the ADB-OECD Anti-Corruption
isu konflik kepentingan yang menjadi Initiative meeting in Bali on September 3rd
fundamental dalam pidana korupsi, yang - 5th, 2007, which was followed up back
banyak melibatkan pejabat pemerintah to back by the international seminar ”MLA,
di internasional dan nasional. Konferensi Extradition, and Asset Recovery”, which was
ini dihadiri kurang lebih 200 peserta dari 29 held on September 5th - 7th, 2007. This meet-
negara, dengan melibatkan 35 pembicara ing yielded resulsts in the form of important
ahli internasional dan nasional dan ditutup decisions being made in the international
oleh ketua MPR, DR. Hidayat Nur Wahid. cooperation effort against corruption, and
Seminar ini menyepakati bahwa konflik the publication of survey results from 19
kepentingan adalah upaya mendasar Asia-Pacific countries on MLA, extra¬dition
yang harus dipecahkan secara sistemik and asset recovery. These findings will serve
dari upaya pemberantasan korupsi. as a guide for countries in their own efforts
to develop international cooperation in the
t 10th Steering Group Meeting of ADB/ areas of MLA, extradition and asset recovery.
OECD Anti Corruption Innitiatives for This meeting was attended by 110 participants
Asia and the Pasific. ADB dan OECD from 29 member and observer states of the
kembali mempercayakan KPK untuk ADB/OECD Anti Corruption Innitiatives.
menjadi tuan rumah program inisiatif

Pencegahan
Prevention
anti-korupsi mereka di Bali pada tanggal t *OUFSOBUJPOBM 4FNJOBS PO w.-" &YUSBEJUJPO
3-5 September 2007, berkelanjutan and Asset Recovery”. The enthusiasm of the
dengan seminar Internasional ‘MLA, participants at this seminar was amazing,
Ekstradisi dan Pengembalian Asset’ pada commensurate to the extremely engaging
tanggal 5 - 7 S e p te m b e r 2 0 0 7 . R a p a t nature of the issues discussed. More than
ini menghasilkan keputusan penting 1 8 0 p a r t i c i p a n t s from 4 0 countr ies
dalam upaya kerjasama internasional and representatives of international
pem berantasan k o rupsi, d e ng an o rg a n i z a t i o n s a t t e n d e d t h i s s e m i n a r.
diter b itk annya buk u has il s u r ve y International organization leaders from the
ter hadap 19 negara di Asia Pasifik tentang UNODC, the OECD, and the ADB were also
”MLA, Extradition and Asset Recovery”. Hasil present at the seminar, which was held in
survey ini akan menjadi panduan setiap Bali on September 5th -7th, 2007. The
negara dalam melakuk an kerjasama event was successful in producing a deep
internasional dalam ketiga area kerjasama understanding of the process of international
internasional di atas. Acara ini dihadiri lebih cooperation to recover stolen assets, the
dari 110 peserta dari 29 negara anggota extradition process, and the forging of MLA. For
dan observer ADB/OECD Anti Corruption this satisfying outcome, we can thank the
Innitiatives. con t r i b ut i on s ma d e by l e a d i n g wo r ld
experts of these issues, including Malam
t Seminar Internasional ”MLA, Extradition Nuhu Ribadu from Nigeria, Jan Bernard
and Asset Recovery”. Antusiame peserta Schidt from Switzerland, Dimitri Vlassis
dalam seminar ini luar biasa, karena from the UNODC, the Marcos’ Asset Hunting
daya tarik isu yang disampaikan. Lebih Team, the Vladimir Montesinos Asset Hunting
dari 180 peserta dari 40 negara dan Team, and experts from the World Bank and the
perwakilan organisasi internasional hadir OECD.
dalam seminar ini. Petinggi organisasi
internasional seperti UNODC, OECD dan t *OUFSOBUJPOBM 5SBJOJOH PO 0WFSTFBT "TTFU
ADB juga hadir dalam seminar yang Recovery. The KPK, in collaboration with the
dilaksanakan di Bali, 5-7 September 2007. International Center for Asset Recovery (ICAR)
Seminar ini menghasilkan pemahaman from the Basel Institute on Governance
yang yang mendalam dalam proses
(Switzerland), with donor assistance from the
kerjasama internasional dalam
DFID, GTZ, and Liechenstein Government,
pengembalian aset, ekstradisi dan MLA
organized International Training on Overseas
karena disajikan langsung oleh ahli-ahli
Asset Recovery as a follow-up on the previous
kelas dunia dari yang mempunyai
seminars and workships held at the Basel
pengalaman langsung dibidangnya
Institute and in Bali. This training event was
seperti Malam Nuhu Ribadu dari Nigeria,
aimed at strengthening the Asset Tracing
Jan Bernard Schidt dari Swiss, Dimitri
and Recovery capabilities of the KPK and
Vlassis dari UNODC, Tim pemburu Aset
Attorney General’s Asset Tracing and Recovery
Marcos, Tim Pemburu Aset Vladimir
Montesinos, dan pakar dari World Bank, Teams in the performance of their duties
dan OECD. of asset tracing and recovery, MLA, and
extradition. Training was provided on
t Training International on Overseas September 17th - 28th, 2007, in Jakarta, with
A s s e t R e cove r y. KPK b ek e rjas am a speakers from the Singapore Attorney General’s
d engan ICAR (International Center for Office, and experts from the United States,
Asset Recovery) dari Basel Institute on Britain, Switzerland, Costa Rica, and Indonesia
Governance, Switzerlands dan melibatkan being invited.
donor dari DFID, GTZ, dan Pemerintah
Liechenstein mengadakan International

Pencegahan
Prevention
Training on Overseas Asset Recovery t *OUFSOBUJPOBM4FNJOBSPOw'JHIUJOH#SJCFSZ
sebagai follow up dari seminar dan in Public Procurements”.
workshop sebelumnya di Basel dan Bali. Corruption cases are often focused on the
Training ini dalam rangka memperkuat a re a of p ub l i c g ood s a n d se r vices
kemampuan Tim ATR (Asset Tracing and procurements. The KPK, in cooperation with
Recvery) KPK dan Jaksa di Kejaksaan theADB/OECD Initiative, held a seminar to
Agung RI dalam melakukan pengembalian explore this issue further. The main goal of
aset dari Luar Negeri, MLA dan ekstradisi. the seminar was to assemble knowledge and
Training yang dilenggarakan pada experience in the handling of bribery cases
t a n g g a l 1 7 - 2 8 S e p te m b e r 2 0 0 7 d i in goods and services procurements, The
J a karta ini mengundang pembicara dari seminar was attended by representatives of
Kejaksaan Singapura, Ahli dari Amerika, various countries and international agencies
Enggris, Swiss, Costarica dan Pakar dari on November 5th - 7th , 2007, in Bali.
Indonesia. c. KPK Participation in International Anti-
t 4FNJOBS *OUFSOBUJPOBM on ”Fighting Corruption Forums
Bribery in Public Procurements”.
Adanya fenomena k asus-k asus yang In the context of strengthening international
ditangani penegak hukum yang mayoritas networks, the KPK regularly attends important
terkait dengan kasus pengadaan barang international forums, which to date have included:
dan jasa, KPK menggandeng ADB/OECD (1) The Global Forum in Johanesburg, South Africa;
mengadakan seminar tmembahsa isu (2) The ICPO Interpol in Brasil; (3) The APEC Anti-
tersebut. Tujuan utama diselenggarkan Corruption Task Force in Australia; (4) The ADB/
kegiatan ini adalah untuk mengumpulkan OECD Anti-Corruption Innitiatives in Bali,
pengetahuan dan pengalaman Indonesia; (5) The 1st Conference on UNCAC in
penanganan kasus penyuapan dalam Jordan; (6) The IAACA International Seminar; (7)
pengadaan barang dan jasa dari berbagai The SOMTC Meeting in Jakarta; (8) APG/FATF
negara dan lembaga internasional, dan Training in Bangkok; (9) Expert Workshop on Asset
menc ar i so lusi yang tepat u nt u k Recovery at the Basel Institute in Switzerland; (10)
menanganinya. Seminar ini The 2nd Conference on IAACA in Bali; and (10)
diselenggarakan pada tanggal Preparations for the 2nd Conference on UNCAC
5-7 November di Bali. Meeting in Bali, to be held on January 28th to
February 2nd in 2008.
c. Partisipasi Aktif KPK dalam Forum Anti-
Korupsi Internasional
Da la m rangk a m em per k uat jar ing an
internasional, KPK secara aktif hadir dalam
forum-forum penting internasional yang
meliputi: (1) Global Forum di Johanesburg,
Afrika Selatan; (2) ICPO Interpol di Brasil; (3)
APEC Anti-Corruption Task Force di Australia;
(4) ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Innitiatives di
Bali, Indonesia; (5) 1st Conference UNCAC
di Jordan; (6) IAACA Internatinal Seminar;
(7) SOMTC Meeting di Jakarta; (8) APG/FATF
Training di Bangkok; (9) Expert Workshop d. International Assistance in Corruption
on Asset Recovery di Basel, Swiss; (10) 2nd Repression
Conference IAACA di Bali; dan (10) Persiapan
2nd Conference UNCAC Meeting di Bali, 28 International cooperation facilitates the
Januari – 2 Februari 2008. KPK’s efforts in eradicating corruption through
repression. In 2007, the KPK engaged in
cooperation for repressive purposes: (1) as part of
Pencegahan
Prevention
d. B a n t u a n I n t e r n a s i o n a l d a l a m Pen- the Ad hoc National Team on Asset Recovery; (2)

indakan Korupsi as part of the negotiating team for the Singapore
– Republic of Indonesia Extradition Treaty; (3) as
Kerjasama internasional diharapkan da-
part of the negotiating team for the ASEAN
pat m e m p e r m u d a h u p a y a K P K d a l a m
Extradition Treaty; (4) as part of the team for
m e m berantas korupsi di bidang penindakan.
the Indonesia – USA Mutual Legal Assistance
Di tahun 2007, KPK melakukan kerjasama
discussions; (5) as part of the negotiating team
terkait dengan penindakan yaitu: (1) Menjadi
for the People’s Repub¬lic of China – Indonesia
bagian tim Adhoc nasional dalam Asset
Treaty; (6) Hosted and assisted the STAR Initiative
Recovery; (2) Menjadi bagian tim perunding
Team from the UNODC and the World Bank in
perjanj ian ekstradisi Singapu ra- RI ;
Jakarta; (7) Pro¬vided Mutual Legal Assistance
(3) Menjadi bagian tim perunding perjanjian
to the Federal Republic of Germany; and (8)
ASEAN-Ekstradisi; (4) Menjadi bagian tim
Extended re¬quests for investigative assistance
MLA Indonesia-USA; (5) Menjadi bagian tim
to the Sin¬gapore CPIB, the Malaysian BPR, the
perunding perjanjian RRC-Indonesia; (6)
Hong Kong ICAC, and the South Korean KICAC.
Menerima dan mendampingi tim STAR
Innitiative dari UNODC dan World Bank di
3. Asset Tracing
Jakarta; (7) Bantuan MLA ke Pemeritah Federal
Jerman; dan (8) Permintaan bantuan Asset Tracing efforts are conducted in the course of
investigasi ke CPIB Singapura, BPR Mal a y s i a , optimizing the recovery of State losses, as well as
ICAC Hongkong, dan KICAC Korea. to respond to public concern about the massive
losses suffered by Indonesia due to corruption. As
3. Asset Tracing of September 2007, 5 asset-tracing efforts had been
undertaken, and IDR1,033,050,000,000.00 and US$
Asset Tracing dilaksanakan dalam rangka men-
4,151,164.00 successfully recovered.
goptimalkan pengembalian kerugian negara ser-
ta menjawab keprihatinan masyarakat meli-
hat jumlah pengembalian asset negara yang
hilang k arena TPK. Sampai dengan Sep-
Donor Support
tember 2007, telah dilakukan sebanyak 5 keg- 1. DANIDA. Regional Parliament (DPRD) Empowerment
iatan asset tracing dengan jumlah aset yang Program, which is designed to increase the capacity
ditemukan sebesar Rp1.033.050.000.000,00 dan of DPRDs. In 2007, workshops to increase the
USD4,151,164.00. capacity of DPRDs were conducted in the Provinces of
East Java, Gorontalo, West Sumatra, South
Kalimantan, and North Sulawesi, involving 20
Regencies/Cities and 5 Provincial Capitals.
Through the KPK facilitated workshops, it is expected

that DPRD members’ understanding of corruption
will have been improved so that the DPRDs will play a
more active role in corruption prevention.
Other activities supported by Danida include the

production of a series of KPK videos that support
the socialization LJKPN, Gratuities, Public
Complaints, and the History of Corruption Eradication
in Indonesia. The socialization and campaign
Dukungan Donor
program includes ‘Mall to Mall’ activities conducted in
1. DANIDA. Dalam program pemberdayaan Manado, Palembang, Batam and Surabaya, as well
Dew a n Per wak ilan R ak yat Daerah (D P R D )

Pencegahan
Prevention
untuk meningkatkan kapasitas peran dan fungsi as the procurement of 2 KPK Mobile Information
D P R D. S e l a m a t a h u n 2 0 0 7 , wo r k s h o p Units to help disseminate anti- corruption
peningkatan kapasitas peran dan fungsi campaign material to the general public in cities
DPRD telah dilakukan di provinisi Jawa Timur, and rural areas, as well as support promotional TV
Gorontalo, Sumatera Barat, Kalimantan Selatan, and radio talk shows broadcast on local and
dan Sulawesi Utara meliputi 20 Kabupaten/ national stations during the course of the DPRD
kota dan 5 Ibukota Provinsi. workshop and the Mall to Mall programs.
Dengan workshop yang difasilitasi oleh KPK

itu, diharapkan pemahaman anggota
Dewan terhadap TPK akan semakin luas sehingga
kedepannya diharapkan DPRD dapat berperan
lebih aktif lagi dalam mencegah perbuatan
korupsi sesuai dengan UU yang ada saat ini.
Kegiatan lain yang didukung Danida antara
lain pembuatan Video Serie KPK penunjang
sosialisasi pelaporan LHKPN, Gratifikasi dan
Pe n g a d u a n M a s y a r a k a t s e r t a S e j a r a h
Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Program
Sosialisasi dan Kampanye dalam bentuk 2. ADB-OECD. During the ADB-OECD Anti-Corruption
kegiatan Mal to Mal dilaksanak an di Initiative 9th Steering Group Meeting, which was
Menado, Palembang, Batam dan Surabaya serta held in Bangkok on November 27th - 29th of 2006,
pengadaan 2 unit Mobil Unit Informasi KPK it was agreed that each member state will deliver
untuk sarana menyebarluaskan materi kampanye a country progress report, which must comply the
anti korupsi bagi kalangan masyarakat luas di established templates.
perkotaan dan di pedesaan dan dukungan untuk
In complying with this, the KPK has collected data
program promo dan talkshow TV dan Radio di TV
from government institutions deemed to have
Lokal dan Nasional selama kegiatan workshop
engaged in anti-corruption ac¬tivities, and have
DPRD, Mal to Mal dilaksanakan.
structured this data into the Indonesia country
progress report. The anti-corruption activities that
2. ADB-OECD. Dalam Steering Group ADB-OECD
have been included in the country progress report,
Anti Corruption Initiative (SGM) ke-9 yang
aside from the KPK’s own, have been undertaken
diadakan di Bangkok pada 27–29 November
by:
2006 diputuskan bahwa setiap negara anggota
r 4UBUF.JOJTUSZPG/BUJPOBM%FWFMPQNFOU1MBOOJOH
wajib untuk mengirimkan country progress report
Bappenas: by way of Presidential Decree No. 80 of
sesuai dengan template yang telah ditetapkan.
2003 on conflicts of interest in public goods and
Sebagai pelaksanaan keputusan tersebut, KPK
services procurement.
mengumpulkan data dari instansi-instansi
r #BOL*OEPOFTJBIBTGPSNVMBUFESVMFTUIBUTUSFOHUIFO
pemerintah yang dinilai telah melakukan
t h e b a n k sup e r vi sor y i n fra st r uc t ure , r isk
kegiatan anti korupsi dan menyusunnya sesuai
management in the banking industry, and financial
template country progress report. Kegiatan-
reporting standards, in line with the standards set by
kegiatan anti korupsi yang dimasukkan dalam
the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS).
country progress report selain dari KPK, berasal
Aside from these rules, Bank Indonesia has also
dari:
formulated rules related to money laundering: Bank
t K ementer ian Negara Perencanaan
Indonesia Ruling No. 8/28/PBI/2006 on Money
Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas): melalui
Transfers.
Keputusan Presiden nomor 80 tahun 2003
r 5IF 4UBUF "VEJU #PBSE #BEBO 1FNFSJLTB
mengatur mengenai isu conflict of interest
Keuangan – BPK): the promulgation of Law
dalam proses pengadaan barang dan jasa
No. 15 of 2006 on the State Audit Board so that
pemerintah.

Pencegahan
Prevention
t Bank Indonesia: membuat peraturan- the scope of the BPK’s audits are widened to
peraturan yang mem per k uat k e rang k a include financial audits, performance audits
kerja pengawasan perbankan, pengelolaan and specific audits. This was followed up on by
manajemen resik o di dalam industri the publishing of the National Financial Audit
perbankan, dan peningkatan standar Standards (Standard Pemeriksaan Keuangan
pelapo ran k euangan, sesuai d e ng an Negara – SPKN), which both central and local
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision government are obligated to use when performing
(BCBS). Selain peraturan tersebut, BI juga audits on state financial management and
membuat aturan yang terkait dengan accountability.
money launderung yaitu Peraturan Bank r 5IF /BUJPOBM -BOE "HFODZ #BEBO 1FSUBOBIBO
Indonesia Nomor 8/28/PBI/2006 tentang Nasional – BPN): in 2006 – 2007, the BPN
Kegiatan Pengiriman Uang. conducted a reselection process to select strategic
t Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK): pengesahan officials at the echelon II and III levels in BPN
UU No.15 Tahun 2006 tentang BPK sehingga facilities all over Indonesia.
ruang lingkup pemeriksaan BPK menjadi r 5IF /BUJPOBM &EVDBUJPO %FQBSUNFOU 5IF
lebih luas meliputi pemeriksaan keuangan, Teachers’ Allowance Program, which is designed
kinerja, dan pemeriksaan dengan tujuan to i m p r o v e t h e w e l f a r e, d e d i ca t i o n , a n d
tertentu. Hal ini selanjutnya diikuti dengan professionalism of teachers.
penerbitan Standar Pemeriksaan keuangan r 5IF%FQBSUNFOUPG'PSFJHO"íBJSTIBEFTUBCMJTIFE
Negara (SPKN) yang wajib digunakan oleh a competency-based recruitment system that
pemerintah pusat maupun daerah pada saat focuses on openness, accountability, transparency,
dilakukannya pemeriksaan pengelolaan dan fairness, and probity by applying a strict
tanggung jawab keuangan negara. recruitment method supported by the effective use
t Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN): pada tahun of information technology.
2006-2007 telah melakukan kegiatan Seleksi r 5IF%JSFDUPSBUF(FOFSBMPG5BYBUJPO
Pejabat BPN yang bertujuan untuk memilih r 5IF /BUJPOBM (PWFSOBODF 1PMJDJFT $PNNJUUFF
pejabat-pejabat strategis untuk Eselon II dan The formulation of Good Corporate Governance
III di lingkungan BPN di seluruh Indonesia. Guidelines and Public Governance Guidelines.
t Departemen Pendidikan Nasional: Program r 5IF +VEJDJBM $PNNJTTJPO DPOEVDUFE UIF
Tu n j a n g a n G u r u y a n g b e r t u j u a n selection process for Supreme Court judges.
meningkatkan kesejahteraan, pengabdian, r 5IF*OEPOFTJBO$IBNCFSPG$PNNFSDF ,BEJO

dan profesionalisme guru sehingga dapat the formulation of the three Par tnership
melaksanakan tugas profesinya dengan Pillars (epk), the establishment of the Bribery-
maksimal. Free Movement campaign (Bersih Tanpa Suap
t Departemen Luar Negeri: menetapkan – BTP) through the BTP student program, the
sistem rekrutmen berbasis kompetensi selection of BTP students, and so forth.
yang mengedepankan aspek keterbukaan, r *OEPOFTJB $PSSVQUJPO 8BUDI *$8
TPMJEJGZJOH
akuntabilitas, transparansi, adil, dan bersih the participation of the public in the selection
tanpa pungutan biaya apapun dengan process of the KPK Commissioners, training
menggunakan metode rekrutmen yang ketat teachers to be critical, and the handling of cases
dan didukung pemanfaatan teknologi related to the provision of public services.
informasi. r *OEPOFTJB 1SPDVSFNFOU 8BUDI *18
UIF
t Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, publication of anti-corruption books and the
t Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance printing of anti-corruption posters.
(KNKG): penyusunan Pedoman Umum GCG r 5SBOTQBSFODZ *OUFSOBUJPOBM *OEPOFTJB 5**
UIF
dan Pedoman Public Governance. development of Islands of Integrity, campaigning
t Komisi Yudisial: melaksanakan proses seleksi for a national integrity system to wage war on
Hakim Agung 2006. corruption, campaigning for bribery-free business
in the private and public sectors, the Corruption
Perception Index Survey of 2006, improving the

Pencegahan
Prevention
t Kamar Dagang Indonesia (Kadin): capacity of the public and local government in
pembentukan tiga Pilar Kemitraan (epK), preventing corruption in the reconstruction of
kampanye Gerakan Bersih Tanpa Suap (BTP) Aceh.
melalui program pelajar BTP, pemilihan
siswa BTP, dll. This Country Progress Report was delivered during the
t I ndonesia Corruption Watch (IC W ): ADB-OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative 10th Steering
penguatan partisipasi masyarakat dalam Group Meeting, which was held in Bali on September
seleksi pimpinan KPK, pelatihan guru kritis, 2nd - 5th of 2007.
penanganan kasus-kasus terkait pelayanan
publik
t Indonesia Procurement Watch (IPW ):
penerbitan buku dan pencetakan poster
anti korupsi.
t Transparency International Indonesia (TII):
pembangunan pulau-pulau integritas,
kampanye sistem integritas nasional untuk
memerangi korupsi, kampanye bisnis tanpa
suap bagi kalangan pengusaha dan BUMN,
Corruption Perception Index Survey 2006,
peningkatan kapasitas masyarakat dan
pemerintah lokal sebagai upaya pencegahan 3. GTZ. One of the donor-related cooperation projects
korupsi dalam rekonstriksi Aceh. conducted in respect of the KPK’s research and
Country progress report ini telah disampaikan development activities was the establishment of
pada acara Steering Group ADB-OECD a clearing house. This is a cooperative project
Anti Corruption Initiative (SGM) ke-10 yang between Indonesia (KPK) and the Federal Republic
diselenggarakan di Bali pada 2–5 September of Germany through GTZ (German Technical
2007 Cooperation, with the goal being the establishment
of an Information Center for Corruption Prevention
3. GTZ. Salah satu kegiatan kerja sama dengan a n d E ra d i ca t i o n . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e G e r m a n
donor yang berhubungan dengan penelitian Government, through Centre for International
dan pengembangan di KPK adalah Migration and Development (CIM), has been
p e m b e n t u kan clearing house. Clearing House supporting the placement of an anti-corruption
adalah proyek kerja sama antara Indonesia expert at the KPK since November 2006.
yang diwakili oleh KPK dan Republik
Fe d e r a l Jerman melalui lembaga Kerja The Clearing House activities will continue for 2
Sama Teknis (GTZ) dalam pembentuk an years from 2007 to 2009, with a budget of EUR
proyek Pusat Informasi Pencegahan dan 2,000,000.00, with 10% of the funds being
Pemberantasan Korupsi. Selain itu, Pemer- earmarked for Non-Governmental Organizations.
intah Jerman juga menugask an seorang The funding available to the KPK amounts to EUR
tenaga ahli anti-korupsi ke KPK melalui 200,000.00, which will be used for procurements,
Center for International Migration and Development the preparing of the information and prevention
(CIM), sejak bulan November 2006. project, the publication of the KPK magazine,
holding of Bureaucracy Reform Seminars, website
Kegiatan clearing house ini direncanakan improvements, and improvements in the KPK’s
berlangsung selama 2 tahun dari 2007-2009, public complaints system.
dengan anggaran sebesar EUR2,000,000.00,
dimana 10% dari dana tersebut digunakan untuk
lembaga swadaya masyarakat (LSM). Dana yang
tersedia untuk KPK sebesar EUR200,000.00
digunak an untuk pembelian barang,

Pencegahan
Prevention
pembentukan proyek informasi dan pencegahan,

penerbitan majalah KPK, Seminar Reformasi
Birokrasi, perbaikan website, dan perbaikan sistem
pengaduan masyarakat di KPK.
4. Donor Lainnya. Untuk kepentingan berbagi

informasi mengenai kegiatan pencegahan dan
pemberantasan korupsi, beberapa donor
seperti GTZ, CIDA, AusAid, Asia Foundation,
USAid, UNODC, dan ADB juga membiayai
penyelenggaraan Seminar Internasional.
Seminar Internasional yang terselenggara

atas kerjasama donor dan KPK antara lain seminar 4. Other Donors. In the interests of information sharing
Conflict of Interest, seminar Asset Recovery and on corruption prevention and eradication activities,
Mutual Legal Assistance, dan seminar Fighting various donors, such as the GTZ, CIDA, AusAid, Asia
Bribery in Public Procurement. Foundation, USAid, UNODC and ADB have also
funded the holding of international seminars.
Donor juga membantu penyelenggaraan studi These seminars have included ones on Conflict of
di KPK seperti studi integritas yang didanai USAid Interest, Asset Recover y and Mutual Legal
melalui program MCC-nya (Millenium Challenge A ssistance, and Fighting Briber y in Public
Corporation), melibatkan KPK dalam pelaksanaan Procurements.
implementasi good governance di beberapa
beberapa kabupaten di Sulawesi yang dibiayai Donors have also assisted studies conducted by
atau dibantu oleh CIDA, dan implementasi good the KPK, such as the study on integrity, which was
governance di Kupang dan NTT yang didanai funded bu USAid through its Millenium Challenge
AusAid. Corporation program, and the involvement of the
KPK in the promotion of good governance in several
Regencies in Sulawesi, with assistance from CIDA,
and studies on the implementation of good
governance in Kupang and NT T, which were
funded by AusAid.

Penggalangan Dukungan Masyarakat
Rallying Public Support
“ Korupsi ditempatkan sebagai kejahatan yang luar

biasa karena dapat mengakibatkan bencana
“
Corruption is an extraordinary crime as it produces
disastrous results for society
K o rupsi di te m pat k an s e bag ai Corruption eradication requires the

kejahatan yang luar biasa k arena par ticipation of three national
dapat mengakibatkan bencana, tidak stakeholders: the public sector, the private
saja terhadap kehidupan perekonomian sector, and the general public. Corruption is
nasional tetapi juga pada kehidupan an extraordinary crime as it violates social
berbangsa dan bernegara. Selain itu, values and the economic rights of
korupsi juga merupakan pelanggaran the Indonesian people. Corruption begets
terhadap akhlak sosial dan hak-hak disasters, not just in the economic life of
ekonomi masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, the nation, as its effects can be seen across
pemberantasan korupsi haruslah all facets of life. Thus, participation by the
dilakukan dengan cara yang luar biasa public, as the stakeholder whose rights are
pula. Salah satu pemegang peranan the most undermined by corrupt conduct,
penting dalam memberantas korupsi is essential.
adalah dukungan dan partisipasi
masyarakat.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun Law No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of

1999 menjamin peran serta masyarakat Corruption mandates the participation of
dalam up aya pe nc e g ahan d an the general public in the following forms:
pemberantasan TPK, yang diwujudkan
t the right to seek , obtain, and
dalam bentuk :
disseminate information on suspicions
t hak mencari, memperoleh, dan of the commission of corrupt conduct;
memberikan informasi adanya t the right to be assisted in seeking,
dugaan telah terjadi TPK; obtaining, and disseminating
t hak memperoleh pelayanan dalam information about suspected corrupt
mencari, memperoleh, dan conduct to law enforcers;
memberikan informasi adanya t the right to convey responsible
dugaan telah terjadi TPK kepada suggestions and opinions to law
penegak hukum enforcers;
t hak menyampaikan saran dan t the right to obtain answers to questions
pendapat secara bertanggung concerning the status of a report after it
jawab kepada penegak hukum has been delivered to law enforcers;
t hak memperoleh jawaban atas t the right to obtain legal protection.
pertanyaan tentang laporannya
yang diberikan kepada penegak
hukum
t hak memperoleh perlindung an
huk um.
Peran serta masyarakat diatur lebih lanjut dalam Public participation in the context of corruption
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 tahun 2000 tentang eradication is further provided for in Government
Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Peran Serta Masyarakat dan Regulation No. 71 of 2000 on Public Participation and
Pemberian Penghargaan dalam Pencegahan dan Awards in the Context of Corruption Eradication (Tata
Pemberantasan Korupsi. Cara Pelaksanaan Peran Serta Masyarakat dan
Pemberian Penghargaan dalam Pencegahan dan
Mengingat pentingnya peran serta masyarakat Pemberantasan Korupsi).
dalam mewujudkan gerakan antikorupsi yang
masif, KPK menempatkan strategi penggalangan Keeping in mind the importance of public participation,
keikutser taan masyarakat sebagai salah satu dari in order to realize a massive anti-corruption effort in
empat pilar strategi utama. Dengan strategi ini, Indonesia, the KPK has positioned its Rallying Public
diharapkan dapat terbangun komunikasi intensif Support Strategy as one of its main strategies. It is hoped
dalam rangka penyampaian berbagai informasi that the implementation of this strategy will effectively
k epa da masyarak at tentang upaya- u pay a disseminate information to the public about anti-
pember a n tasan korupsi yang telah dilakukan serta corruption efforts, while helping develop a cooperative
membangun kerja sama dengan mekanisme yang relationship through mechanisms that allow the general
memungkinkan masyarakat berperan serta secara public to play an active role in corruption eradication.
aktif dalam pemberantasan korupsi.
This strategy is intended to heighten the public’s trust in
S t r a tegi ini ditujuk an untuk mening k at k an the handling of corruption complaints so that the public
k epercay aan masyarakat terhadap penanganan will be motivated to increase its role in the anti-corruption
pengaduan dugaan TPK yang disampaikan sehingga effort, thus bolstering the national anti-corruption
diharapk an dapat meningk atk an peran ser ta culture. It is hoped that this will generate a virtuous circle
masyarak at dalam pemberantasan TPK dan that will improve the way in which public complaints are
pembangunan sikap antikorupsi. Untuk mewujudkan dealt with.
hal tersebut, telah dilaksanakan kegiatan peningk atan
efektivitas dan efisiensi penanganan pengaduan
masyarakat melalui sosialisasi tata cara penyampaian
pengaduan masyarakat. Kegiatan tersebut diharapkan
mampu meningk atk an kualitas penanganan
pengaduan masyarakat.
Penanganan Pengaduan Masyarakat Responding to Public Support

KPK telah membuka akses seluas-luasnya kepada The KPK strives to provide the widest possible access to the
masyarakat dalam menyampaikan pengaduan public in submitting corruption complaints.
terjadinya TPK.

Complaints can be delivered by various means: personal

delivery to the KPK Offices, by phone, by post, by email, by
phone text message, and by facsimile.
In 2007 (per December 18th), the KPK had received 6.441

complaints. Of that number, 92.76% (5,975) have been
analyzed, with 1,227 complaints (19.05%) containing
indications of corrupt conduct. A total of 508 (7.89%)
complaints have been tranferred to other institutions,
while 184 (2.86%) are being handled by the KPK internally.
In all, 4,748 (73.72%) complaints could not be followed up
on as they were unacceptable as corruption complaints.
Pengaduan dapat disampaikan melalui berbagai This was due to the fact that they were not supported by
media, yaitu penyampaian secara langsung ke enough clear information, including, but not limited to,
kantor KPK, melalui telepon, pos, surat elektronik the identity and address of the complainant. Such
(e-mail), layanan pesan singkat (SMS), dan faksimili (fax). complaints are, however, still archived in the KPK
public complaints information system in anticipation of
Di tahun 2007 (per 18 Desember 2007), KPK telah the receipt of future complaints on the same subject that
menerima pengaduan sebanyak 6.441. Dari do contain sufficient information.
Jumlah tersebut, telah ditelaah 5.975 (92,76%)
pengaduan, dengan hasil 1.227 (19,05%) Of the 184 (2.86%) complaints the KPK is handling inter-
pengaduan mengandung indikasi TPK. Sejumlah 508 nally, 122 (66.30%) have been forwarded to the Office of
(7,89%) pengaduan telah dikoordinasikan dengan the Deputy for Repression; 48 (26.09%) to the Office of
instansi lain, 184 (2,86%) pengaduan ditindaklanjuti the Deputy for Prevention; and 14 (7.61%) to other
di internal KPK, 4.748 (73,72%) pengaduan tidak KPK Departments. Of the 508 (7,89%) complaints
dapat ditindaklanjuti karena bukan merupakan TPK. transferred to other law enforcement institutions, 136
(26.77%) were forwarded to the Police; 198 (39.98%) to the
Selain itu, alasan adanya pengaduan yang tidak AGO; 32 (6.30%) to the BPKP; 37 (7.28%) to Inspectorate
dapat ditindaklanjuti adalah karena tidak didukung Generals; 74 (14.57%) to the State Audit Board; 5 (0.98%)
data memadai, identitas, dan alamat pelapor yang to the Supreme Court; and 26 (5.12%) to Regional Audit
jelas. Berkas/dokumen pengaduan yang tidak Boards (Bawasda).
dapat ditindaklanjuti tetap disimpan dalam sistem
informasi pengaduan masyarakat, sehingga dapat
dipergunakan sebagai tambahan informasi untuk
materi pengaduan yang sama.
Dari 184 (2,86%) pengaduan yang ditindaklanjuti

di internal KPK, 122 (66,30%) pengaduan diteruskan
ke Deputi Penindakan, sebanyak 48 (26,09%)
pengaduan diteruskan ke Deputi Pecegahan, dan
sebanyak 14 (7,61%) pengaduan diteruskan ke
Bidang lain di KPK. Selanjutnya, dari 508 (7,89%)
pengaduan yang telah dikoordinasikan dengan
instansi terkait, terdistribusi sebagai berikut: 136
(26,77%) kepada Kepolisian, 198 (38,98%) kepada
Kejaksaan, 32 (6,30%) kepada BPKP, 37 (7,28%) kepada
Itjen, 74 (14,57%) kepada BPK, 5 (0,98%) kepada MA,
dan 26 (5,12%) kepada Bawasda.

R e k a p i t u l a s i L a p o r a n Pe n g a d u a n Recapitulation of Public Complaints in 2007 by

M a s ya ra kat Tahun 2007 Menurut Provinsi Province
1SPWJOTJ +VNMBI
No %
Province Total
1 Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam 123 1,91%
2 Sumatera Utara 491 7,62%
3 Riau 207 3,21%
4 Kepulauan Riau 136 2,11%
5 Sumatera Barat 111 1,72%
6 Sumatera Selatan 250 3,88%
7 Kep. Bangk a Belitung 47 0,73%
8 Jambi 131 2,03%
9 Bengkulu 82 1,27%
10 Lampung 155 2,41%
11 Jawa Barat 567 8,80%
12 Banten 118 1,83%
13 Kalimantan Selatan 139 2,16%
14 Kalimantan Tengah 83 1,29%
15 Kalimantan Barat 80 1,24%
16 Kalimantan Timur 250 3,88%
17 DKI Jak ar ta 1.170 18,16%
18 D.I. Yogyak ar ta 87 1,35%
19 Jawa Tengah 474 7,36%
20 Jawa Timur 596 9,25%
21 Sulawesi Utara 88 1,37%
22 Sulawesi Selatan 201 3,12%
23 Sulawesi Tengah 68 1,06%
24 Sulawesi Tenggara 64 0,99%
25 Gorontalo 42 0,65%
26 Papua 109 1,69%
27 Bali 75 1,16%
28 Nusa Tenggara Barat 129 2,00%
29 Nusa Tenggara Timur 62 0,96%
30 Maluku Utara 42 0,65%
31 Maluku 60 0,93%
32 Irian Jaya Barat 10 0,16%
33 Sulawesi Barat 41 0,64%
LN Luar Negeri 17 0,26%
X Belum diidentifik asik an asal provinsinya 136 2,11%
+VNMBI

Penanganan Laporan Pengaduan 2007 Public Complaints Handling

Masyarakat Tahun 2007
7.000
6.441
5.975
6.000
5.000
+VNMBI( Total)
4.000
3.000
2.000
1.227
1.000
508
184
0
1FOHBEVBO 1FOHBEVBO #FSJOEJLBTJ 5JOEBLMBOKVU 5JOEBLMBOKVU
%JUFSJNB %JUFMBBI 51,(Report PMFI,1, *OTUBOTJ-BJO
(Received (Reviewed with Corruption (Follow-up by (Follow-up by
Report) Report) Indication) KPK) Other
"HFODJFT
Tindak Lanjut Pengaduan Masyarakat oleh Internal Follow-up of Complaints by the KPK
Internal KPK Tahun 2007 2007
Penindakan
(Delivered to
Pencegahan Prosecution):
(Delivered to 14 (7,61%) Bidang Lain
Prevention): (Delivered to
18 (26,09%) Other Dept.):
122 (66,30%)

Tindak Lanjut Pengaduan Masyarakat ke Follow up of Public Complaints to Other

Instansi Lain Tahun 2007 Institutions 2007
Kepolisian (National Police)

Kejaksaan (Attorney General)
BPKP (The Financial & Dev.
)
%
,3
Supervisory Board)
(6
32
189 (39,0%)
,3%) Itjen (Inspectorate General)
37 (7
BPK (The Audit Board of the
Republic of Indonesia)
14%
MA (Supreme Court)
130(26,8%)
Bawasda (Regional
Supervisory Board)
5 (1,0%)
26 (5,1%)
Secara ringkas, rekapitulasi penanganan pengaduan In brief, the recapitulation for the handling of public
masyarakat periode 2004-2007 terlihat pada grafik di complaints for the period of 2004 to 2007 is
bawah. represented graphically below.
Rekap Penanganan Pengaduan Masyarakat Periode 2004-2007

(Public Complaints Handling 2004-2007)
8.000
6.938
7.000
7.361
+VNMBI (Total)
6.000 6.837
6.441
5.000 5.975
4.000
3.000 2.466
2.281
1.628
2.000
1.466 1.284
643 1.227
1.000 1.080
90 171 508
13 184
- -
2004 2005 2006 2007
Pengaduan Diterima (Received Report) Pengaduan Ditelaah (Reviewed Report)

Berindik asi TPK (Report with Corruption Indication) Tindaklanjut oleh KPK (Follow-up by KPK)
Tindaklanjut Instansi Lain (Follow-up by Other Agencies)

Sosialisasi Pengaduan Masyarakat Socialization of the Public Complaints System

KPK melaksanakan serangkaian kegiatan sosialisasi The KPK has conducted a series of socialization activities,
dan peningk atan pemahaman masyarak at as well as events to improve the public’s understanding of
mengenai pemberantasan korupsi seper ti corruption eradication. These have included a public anti-
k ampanye publik antikorupsi, baik melalui corruption campaign through formal and non-formal
pendidikan formal maupun nonformal, kerja sama education programs; cooperation with community
dengan lembaga kemasyarakatan, pertukaran institutions; information exchange; and by establishing a
informasi, dan penyediaan database profil korupsi. database on the profile of corruption. These activities have
Kegiatan dimaksud telah dilaksanakan di beberapa been carried out in Pekanbaru, Surabaya, Yogyakarta, and
kota, yakni di Pekanbaru, Surabaya, Yogyakarta, dan Makassar.
Makassar.
With these activities, it is hoped that behavioural change
Dengan kegiatan ini, diharapkan dapat tercipta will begin to occur, specifically, positive changes in respect
perubahan perilaku, sistem kemasyarakatan, of the social system, social rules, and anti-corruption
pranata sosial, serta nilai-nilai kehidupan yang values that will allow the public to become more active
antikorupsi sehingga masyarakat dapat berperan in implementing social control over potentially corrupt
lebih aktif dalam melaksanakan kontrol sosial practices within their own environments. It is expected
terhadap praktik-praktik TPK di lingkungannya that these changes will lead to a greater public willingness
serta meningkatnya keberanian untuk melaporkan to report indications of corruption to the law enforcement
indikasi TPK kepada instansi penegak hukum. agencies.
Dukungan Media Massa terhadap KPK Media Support for KPK



Program Kerja 2008
2008 Work Program
Program Kerja 2008
2008 Work Program
“ KPK mendapatkan dukungan dana Rupiah Murni

APBN sebesar Rp259,03 miliar
In 2008 the KPK will receive IDR259.03 billion
“
from the state budget (APBN)
Untuk melaksanakan berbagai program In order to undertake its various programs

kegiatan tahun 2008, KPK mendapatkan and activities, in 2008 the KPK will receive
dukungan dana Rupiah Murni APBN IDR259.03 billion from the state budget
sebesar Rp259,03 miliar, dengan alokasi (APBN), with an allocation of 43.34% for
43,34% untuk Belanja Pegawai, 44,28% personnel expenditure, 44.28% for material
untuk Belanja Barang, dan 12,38% un- expenditure, and 12.38% for capital
tuk Belanja Modal. expenditures.
Belanja Modal
(Capital Expenditure) 12,38%
Belanja Pegawai
43,34% (Personnel Expenditure)
Belanja Barang
(Material Expenditure) 44,28%
Dukungan dana tersebut akan dialokasikan Based on the aforementioned funding, cor-
untuk berbagai kegiatan pemberantasan ruption eradication activities in 2008 will be
korupsi pada tahun 2008 yang dikelompokkan grouped into six programs, with the details
ke dalam enam program dengan perincian being as follows:
tiap-tiap kegiatan/sub kegiatan sebagai
berikut:
9,41% Penegakan Hukum dan HAM

Law Enforcement & Human Rights
Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum dan HAM
12,33% Improved Legal & Human Rights Awareness
Peningkatan Kualitas Profesi Hukum
6,78% Legal Profession Reform
53,58%
Perencanaan Hukum
4,84% Legal Planning
Peningkatan Sarana dan Prasarana
13,07% Facilities & Infrastructure Improvement
Penerapan Kepemerintahan yang Baik
Good Governance Implementation

Program Kerja 2008
2008 Work Program
Program Penegakan Hukum dan HAM Law Enforcement and Human Rights Program
Program ini bertujuan meningkatkan kepercayaan This program is intended to increase public confidence in
publik terhadap upaya pemberantasan korupsi di the corruption eradication effort in Indonesia. The
Indonesia. Sasaran program ini adalah: (a) meningkatnya objectives of the program are as follows: (a) increasing
penyelesaian kasus TPK; (b) meningkatnya koordinasi the number of corruption cases solved; (b) increasing
dan supervisi dengan lembaga penegak hukum lainnya; coordination with, and supervision of, other law enforcement
dan (c) meningkatnya jumlah pengembalian kerugian agencies; and (c) increasing the value of recovered state
negara yang diakibatkan oleh TPK. Untuk program ini losses. The program has a budget allocation of IDR24.295
dialokasikan dana sebesar Rp24,295 miliar (9,41%). billion (9.41%).
Berbagai kegiatan yang direncanakan dalam program Program activities include supervision and coordination
ini meliputi: supervisi dan koordinasi penanganan efforts in corruption cases; the execution of conclusive
perkara TPK; penyelidikan, penyidikan dan penuntutan judicial decisions; witness protection; technical assistance
kasus TPK; eksekusi putusan pengadilan yang telah for preliminary investigations and investigations;
inkracht; perlindungan saksi; bantuan teknis penyelidikan coordinating meetings and consultations; and the holding of
dan penyidikan TPK; penyelenggaraan rapat koordinasi anti-corruption discussions, seminars and informal talks.
dan konsultasi; serta penyelenggaraan diskusi dan
seminar pemberantasan korupsi. Improved Legal and Human Rights Awareness
Program
Program Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum dan HAM
IDR31.841 billion (12.33%) will be allocated to this
Dana sebesar Rp31,841 miliar (12,33%) dialokasikan program, which is designed to build a culture of an-
untuk program yang bertujuan membangun budaya ti-corruption. The objectives of the program are to: (a)
antikorupsi ini. Sasaran program peningkatan increase public participation in corruption eradication;
kesadaran hukum dan HAM adalah: (a) meningkatnya (b) achieve effective supervision as regards the wealth of
partisipasi masyarakat dalam pemberantasan korupsi; State and Government Officials; and (c) achieve effective
(b) terlaksananya pengawasan yang baik terhadap analysis and follow-up of public complaints.
kekayaan Pejabat/PN; dan (c) terlaksananya penelaahan
dan tindak lanjut terhadap pengaduan masyarakat.
Untuk melaksanakan program tersebut, telah

direncanakan: (a) kegiatan penanganan pengaduan
masyarakat tentang TPK, yang terdiri dari operasional
pencegahan korupsi di daerah, pengumpulan bahan
dan keterangan tambahan, penguatan jaringan kerja
dan kemitraan, supervisi dan koordinasi penanganan
TPK, serta rapat koordinasi; (b) kegiatan pengelolaan
LHKPN, yang terdiri dari penyuluhan dan penyebaran
informasi, pemutakhiran data LHKPN, pengadaan
formulir LHKPN, pemeriksaan LHKPN, pengumuman
LHKPN dalam BN/TBN, serta pengumpulan bahan dan
keterangan tambahan; (c) kegiatan pengelolaan gratifikasi,
yang terdiri dari penyuluhan dan penyebaran informasi,
penyediaan perangkat penanganan gratifikasi, serta
pemeriksaan gratifikasi; (d) kegiatan pendidikan dan
sosialisasi pemberantasan korupsi, yang terdiri dari
penyelenggaraan humas dan protokol, penyuluhan
dan penyebaran informasi, penyediaan perangkat

Program Kerja 2008
2008 Work Program
sosialisasi, pembuatan dan penayangan public service For the purposes of implementing this program, the
advertisement (PSA), dan workshop dalam rangka following activities are planned: (a) activities concerning
percepatan pemberantasan korupsi. the handling public corruption complaints, composed of
anti-corruption operations in provincial areas, collection
Program Peningkatan Kualitas Profesi Hukum of material and extra information, strengthening work
networks and partnerships, supervision and coordination
Dengan alokasi dana sebesar Rp17.508 miliar (6,78%),
of corruption eradication, and coordination meetings at
program ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kinerja
various levels; (b) LHKPN (wealth reports of public officials)
SDM KPK dalam rangka pemberantasan korupsi. Sasaran
management activities, composed of the following: holding
yang ingin dicapai adalah terciptanya SDM KPK, khususnya
education seminars and information dissemination;
penegak hukum, yang profesional dan berkualitas.
updatingLHKPN data; procuring LHKPN forms; checks/
follow-ups on submitted LHKPNs; LHKPN announcements
Kegiatan yang direncanakan adalah pendidikan dan
in the State Gazette and State Gazette Supplement; and
pelatihan teknis, penyelenggaraan ceramah/diskusi/
collecting material and additional information; (c) gratuity
seminar, penyelenggaraan sidang/konferensi internasional
management activities, composed of: holding education
di dalam maupun luar negeri, penelitian dan pengembangan
seminars and information dissemination; assigning
hukum, penguatan kelembagaan, dan penyempurnaan
special officers to deal with gratuities and examining
standar audit kode etik internal audit.
gratuity reports; (d) corruption eradication education
activities, composed of developing Human Resources and
Protocol, holding educational seminars and information
dissemination; supplying socialization materials; production
and broadcasting of Public Service Announcements, and
holding workshops in the context of accelerating the
national anti-corruption effort.
Legal Profession Reform Program

With a budget allocation of IDR17.508 billion (6.78%), this
program is intended to improve the performance of KPK
human resources in the context of corruption eradication.
The main objective is the creation of KPK human resources,
specifically law enforcers, that are professional and of high
quality.
Activities planned to support the achievement of this

objective include: technical education and training;
arranging events such as speeches, discussions, seminars,
and informal meetings that focus on quality improvements
within the legal professions; arranging international
events, such as conferences in Indonesia or abroad that
address such quality improvements; legal research and
development; finding ways to strengthen institutions; and
perfecting the auditing standards for internal code of ethics
audits.

Program Kerja 2008
2008 Work Program
Program Perencanaan Hukum Legal Planning Program

Terciptanya refomasi sektor publik menjadi tujuan The bringing about of real public sector reform is the
dari program yang mendapatkan alokasi dana sebesar objective of this program, which, has a budget allocation
Rp12,488 miliar (4,84%) ini. Sasaran yang akan di- of IDR12,488 billion (4.84%). The objectives of the program
wujudkan program ini adalah terselenggaranya kerja are as follows: forging cooperation between agencies in
sama antarinstansi pemerintah/lembaga/swasta da- the public, institutional and private sectors in the context
lam rangka pemberantasan korupsi, terlaksananya of corruption eradication, and the implementation of
reformasi birokrasi melalui pengkajian dan evaluasi bureaucracy reform through analysis and evaluation of
pelayanan publik lembaga negara, serta pemantauan public and state institutions, as well as supervising how
pelaksanaan tugas instansi/lembaga. such institutions discharge their duties and obligations.
Kegiatan yang direncanakan untuk pelaksanaan The following activities are planned as part of this
program ini adalah: (a) pengkajian sistem pelayanan Program are: (a) evaluations of the public service
publik instansi/lembaga; (b) penyelenggaraan systems of public institutions and agencies; (b) research
penelitian dan pengembangan yang terdiri dari studi and development activities, composed of the following
kebijaksanaan; penjalinan kerjasama dengan institusi sub-activities: policy analysis; cultivation of cooperation
lain; serta bimbingan teknis, evaluasi, dan permodelan with other institutions; and technical guidance, evaluation
Good Governance; (c) kegiatan peningkatan efektivitas and modeling for Good Governance; (c) activities to
dan efisiensi pengawasan, yang terdiri dari audit dan increase the effectiveness and efficiency of supervision,
penyelidikan internal KPK; dan (d) perencanaan/ including the conducting of internal audits and investigations
penyusunan/pengembangan program dan sistem within the KPK; and (d) activities to plan, structure and
prosedur yang terdiri dari penyusunan/perumusan develop procedural programs and systems, including
sistem dan prosedur teknis, dan peremajaan hardware structuring and formulating technical systems and
dan software. procedures; and maintaining and updating hardware
and software.

Program Kerja 2008
2008 Work Program
Program Peningkatan Sarana dan Prasarana Facilities and Infrastructure Improvement Program
Untuk program yang bertujuan meningkatkan This program will be implemented for the purpose of
produktivitas KPK ini, dialokasikan dana sebesar increasing the KPK’s productivity, and will have a budget
Rp33,746 miliar (13,07%). Sasaran yang akan dicapai of IDR33.746 billion (13.07%). The objectives of the
adalah tersedianya unit ruang pelatihan, serta tersedianya program are as follows: the establishment of one training
peralatan dan sistem yang memadai. Pelaksanaan center, and the procurement of appropriate equipment
program ini rencananya akan dilakukan dengan kegiatan and systems. In order to implement this program, the
perekayasaan perangkat lunak, pengadaan peralatan development, procurement and improvement of facilities
TI, pengadaan buku perpustakaan, rehabilitasi bangunan and infrastructure are planned, which will include
gedung negara, dan pengadaan peralatan penunjang the following sub-activities: software development; IT
operasional. equipment procurement; library materials procurement;
building rehabilitation work; and the procurement of
Program Penerapan Kepemerintahan yang Baik operational support equipment.
Dengan alokasi dana sebesar Rp138,380 miliar
(50,58%) dan bertujuan demi terselenggaranya
Good Governance Implementation Program
kegiatan operasional KPK. Adapun kegiatan yang With a budget allocation of IDR138.380 billion (50.58%),
akan dilaksanakan adalah: (a) pengelolaan gaji, this program is intended to enhance the KPK’s operational
hononarium, dan tunjangan; dan (b) kegiatan work. Activities will include: (a) salary, honorarium, and
penyelenggaraan operasional perkantoran, yang allowances management; and (b) office improvements,
terdiri dari operasionalisasi poliklinik , rapat koordinasi including the provision of a clinic; holding coordination
dan konsultasi, penyewaan jaringan telekomunikasi and consultation meetings; the renting of a satellite leased
(leased channel) satelit, perawatan sarana dan gedung channel; maintenance of office building and facilities;
kantor, perawatan kendaraan bermotor, pengadaan maintenance of vehicles with 2, 4, 6, and 10 wheels;
perlengkapan kantor, penyewaan gedung kantor/ procurement of office equipment; building, equipment,
peralatan/kendaraan, berlangganan daya dan jasa, dan and vehicle rental; power and services subscriptions; and
kegiatan operasional lainnya. other operational needs.
.


KPK Annual Report 2007 - Empowering Law Enforcement

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

KPK Annual Report 2007 - Empowering Law Enforcement

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

“ KORUPSI terjadi tidak

hanya karena PEJABAT

CORRUPTION does not

Creating an Indonesia Free from Corruption

To be the Driver of Change in the

Pimpinan KPK / Commissioners

Foreword by KPK Commissioners

1 1. BAB 1 : Sekilas KPK / Chapter 1 : KPK in Brief

7 2. BAB 2: Kondisi dan Strategi / Chapter 2 : Conditions and Strategies

17 3. BAB 3 : Pembangunan Kelembagaan

37 4. BAB 4 : Penindakan / Chapter 4 : Repression

109 6. BAB 6 : Penggalangan Dukungan Masyarakat

120 7. BAB 7 : Program Kerja 2007 / Chapter 7 : 2008 Work Program

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun Law No. 30 of 2002 on the Corruption

Tugas, Wewenang, dan Kewajiban Duties, Authorities and Obligations

2 Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

t Melaksanakan dengar pendapat atau pertemuan

Supervisi (Pasal 8 Ayat 1)

t Conduct discussions and meetings with institutions

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007 3

t Temporarily freeze a financial transaction, trade transaction

4 Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

t Memberikan saran kepada pimpinan lembaga Organization (Article 21)

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007 5

Struktur Organisasi KPK

Deputi Bidang Pengawasan Internal

Direktorat Pendaftaran dan Direktorat Pengolahan Informasi

Direktorat Pembinaan Jaringan Kerja

Direktorat Pendidikan dan

Direktorat Penelitian dan

6 Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

“ Pemberantasan korupsi harus disikapi sebagai

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Tidak semua k r itik dilandasi tujuan untuk

Tantangan dan Hambatan

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Selain belum optimalnya upaya mengubah

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

strategy is based on the principle that the arrest of all

This two-pronged strategy was adopted after the KPK

Perbaikan/reformasi sistem pemerintahan dilakukan

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Untuk mendukung pembangunan In order to support the process of institu-

Pengembangan Manajemen SDM Human Resources Development

18 Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007 19

dibagi menjadi tiga kategori kompetensi, yaitu:

20 Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Komposisi SDM Tahun 2007

Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007 21

1. Menurut Unit Organisasi 1. According to Organizational Units

Komposisi Pegawai KPK Menurut Unit Organisasi

2. Menurut Kelompok Jabatan 2. According to Job Groups

Komposisi Pegawai KPK Menurut Kelompok Jabatan

Administrasi dan Pendukung

3. Menurut Status Kepegawaian 3. According to Personnel Status

Pegawai Tidak Tetap

22 Laporan Tahunan /Annual Report 2007

Peningkatan Kapasitas SDM Human Resources Capacity Improvements

pengadaan barang peralatan laboratorium t 461"3."/T case: in relation to attempts