Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anagnostopoulos (2003) - Empirical Correlations of Soil Parameters Based On Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) For Greek Soils
Anagnostopoulos (2003) - Empirical Correlations of Soil Parameters Based On Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) For Greek Soils
377
# 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
Abstract. This study presents the results of Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) and estimated
correlations with the results of other in-situ tests (standard penetration test, cross-hole,
seismocone) and laboratory tests (classification and undrained shear strength tests). These
tests cover nearly all types of penetrable soils in Greece and, together with the formulation
of empirical correlations, complement and improve on previous studies due to the significant
number of CPT measurements.
Key words. cone penetration test, Greek soils, in-situ tests, laboratory tests, site investigation.
1. Introduction
1.1. THE CPT TESTS
The cone penetration test, CPT, has been used for many years as a standard inves-
tigation tool, mainly to determine quickly the soil profile (through the friction ratio)
as well as for the estimation of the undrained shear strength, su, in the case of cohe-
sive soils. There exist mainly two kinds of CPT apparatuses, namely mechanical and
electrical. The majority of them use a cone with the standard dimensions of the
Dutch Cone (60 apex angle and a base area of 10 cm2).
Although the CPT is gaining popularity, the older in-situ apparatus known as
standard penetration test, SPT, is still used in almost all geotechnical investigations,
during sampling boring. Thus, correlations between SPT and CPT are of practical
interest, considering the great number of existing data obtained with SPT.
More recently, the seismocone was developed to assess additionally the dynamic
behaviour of soils by estimating the shear modulus, Go, through the measurement
of the shear wave velocity, Vs.
The Greek Central Public Works Laboratory carried out a significant number of
Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) over the last years, within the framework of research
? Department of Geotechnical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Greece, 42 Patission
Street, 10682 Athens, Greece. e-mail: gktsiamb@central.ntua.gr
378 A. ANAGNOSTOPOULOS ET AL.
They can also be distinguished by their different colour. The upper layers, usually of
a whitish-yellow or light yellow colour, contain a high percentage of calcite (higher
than 65 per cent) and belong to the category of limey marls, whereas the deeper lay-
ers of a grey, brownish-grey or bluish-grey colour present a low calcite content (less
than 35 per cent) and are classified as clay marls. The latter exhibit higher values of
Atterberg limits (liquidity limit greater than 50 and plasticity index greater than 30)
and very often are considered as expansive soils (Tsiambaos, 1991).
After the deposition of marls various processes took place, the most important
being cementation due to the presence of calcium carbonate. Cementation produces
strong bonds between the particles, especially for normal and limey marls with a cal-
cium carbonate content higher than 50 per cent. The difficulty to obtain undisturbed
samples of very stiff to hard marls, on which laboratory tests can be carried out, ren-
ders in-situ tests, and particularly CPT, the best methods of assessing the mechanical
properties of those marls, when they can be penetrated by the cone.
The Pleistocene and Holocene deposits in Greece are of terrestrial, lacustrine and
marine origin. These are located in rather restricted areas around river flow plains,
coastal regions, recent lakes and inland basins.
In typical Mediterranean climatic conditions Quaternary terrestrial clays have
been formed by the disintegration and decomposition of calcareous rocks (lime-
stones, dolomites and marls). These clays are relatively permeable due to the calcium
carbonate content.
Soft soils of lacustrine and paludal origin show a regular succession of alternating
layers of sands, silts and clays. They exhibit a varved structure, with a more or less
uniform distribution of organic matter into the silt and clay layers.
The alluvial deposits are usually mixed phases of both coarse and fine-grained
materials of various thickness and consistency, as well as variable strength, bearing
capacity and compressibility. These mixed phases exhibit either lateral and vertical
transitions, or distinct alternations of the different lithological types.
Cone penetration tests are applicable to alluvial soils finer than gravel. However,
high capacity CPT equipment can penetrate stiff to hard soils. The soil types tested
and recorded in the database are mainly clays and marls (54%), silts (20%) and
sands (20%) with a small percentage of sands with gravel (6%).
The estimation of undrained shear strength for cohesive soils, with the help of the
cone resistance computed from CPT results, is based on the following formula as
noted by many authors:
qc ¼ Nk :su þ p ð1Þ
where: qc is the cone resistance.
380 A. ANAGNOSTOPOULOS ET AL.
Figure 1. Relationship between cone resistance and undrained shear strength for cohesive soils
Figure 2. Relationship between sleeve friction and undrained shear strength for cohesive soils
considering both cone types, the fs/su ratio is 1.21, with a correlation coefficient of
0.94. When separating the results according to the cone type, this ratio equals to
1.26 and 1 for the mechanical and the electrical cone, respectively. It should be stated
that the estimated value for the mechanical cone is similar to those suggested by
Drnevich et al. (1974), Cancelli et al. (1982) and Zervogiannis et al. (1987).
A number of studies has been presented over the years to relate SPT N values to CPT
cone resistance qc. Thorburn and Mac Vicar (1970), Muromachi (1981) and Robert-
son et al. (1983) have ascertained that the ratio qc/NSPT is related to the soil grain size
distribution, as expressed by the mean particle size (D50). It is usual practice to nor-
malize the qc values by dividing them with the atmospheric pressure, pa. It has been
demonstrated by the previous researchers that the ratio (qc/pa)/N increases with
increasing mean grain size.
Figure 3 shows the relationship between the (qc/pa)/N60 ratio and D50, using N60
values corresponding to an energy ratio, Er, of about 60%. This relationship, which
is based on results obtained with both mechanical and electrical cones, is quite simi-
lar to that initially suggested by Robertson et al. (1983). It should be noted that a
different correlation has been suggested by Zervogiannis and Kalteziotis (1988),
based on another set of data from Greece. The difference can be attributed to the
uncorrected SPT values used by Zervogiannis and Kalteziotis which may produce
a low ratio of CPT to SPT (Lunne et al., 1997).
382 A. ANAGNOSTOPOULOS ET AL.
Douglas and Olsen (1981) produced charts for soil identification using CPT data
obtained with electrical cone and confirmed early observations that sandy soils tend
to produce high cone resistance, qc, and low friction ratio ( fs/qc), whereas, for soft
clay soils the reverse is true (i.e., they tend to produce low cone resistance and high
friction ratio).
The value of the mean soil particle size D50 plays a significant role in the evalua-
tion of a classification diagram based on the results of the cone penetration test and
especially the friction ratio (Rf ¼ fs/qc). Figure 4 shows the correlation of D50 and
Rf, which is linear on a semi-logarithmic plot diagram, with sufficiently high corre-
lation coefficients for both cone types.
Similar correlations have been formulated by Muromachi (1981), for alluvial
soils in Japan, and by Zervogiannis et al. (1987) for soils of the city of Kalamata,
in southern Greece.
The small strain shear modulus, Go, can be estimated through the shear wave
velocity, Vs, as determined from seismocone and cross-hole tests, according to the
equation:
Go ¼ rVs2 ð2Þ
where r is the mass density of the soil tested.
EMPIRICAL CORRELATIONS OF SOIL PARAMETERS 383
Figure 4. Relationship between friction ratio (Rf ) and mean soil particle size D50
Baldi et al. (1986) and Jamiolkowski et al. (1988), among others, believe that at
least in cohesionless soils the small strain shear modulus (Go) can be directly and
fairly reliably correlated with qc using the following linear formula:
Go ¼ Aqc ð3Þ
where the value of the coefficient A ranges from 4 to 10 (qc and Go in MPa).
Figure 5 shows the estimated Go–qc relationship for all soils (107 tests) from
the present study, using mechanical and electrical cones. The correlation is expo-
nential (the exponent is approximately 1), with correlation coefficients r ¼ 0.85
for all cones. When separating the results by cone type, the correlation coeffi-
cient decreases slightly, and becomes 0.84 and 0.82 for mechanical and electrical
cones, respectively. It is interesting to note that no difference can be discerned
in the relationship when plotting separately results from cohesive and cohesion-
less soils.
Similar formulas, although from a limited number of tests, have also been
defined by Zervogiannis et al. (1987), Bouckovalas et al. (1989) and Koukis
et al. (1997) for the alluvial soils from the cities of Kalamata and Patras, in
southern Greece. It should be pointed out that the formulas suggested by Baldi
et al. (1986) and Jamiolkowski et al. (1988) are quite different from the
correlations estimated for Greek soils.
384 A. ANAGNOSTOPOULOS ET AL.
Figure 5. Relationship between cone resistance and dynamic (elastic) shear modulus
If the two cone types were equivalent, the cone resistance and sleeve friction
ratio would obviously be equal to unity. The discrepancy revealed by Figures 6 and 7
can be attributed to the following reasons. First the different function of the
two cones, e.g., the stepwise penetration of the mechanical cone, versus the
continuous penetration of the electrical cone, produces an inherent variation.
Figure 6. Relationship between the qc(mech)/qc(elec) ratio and cone resistance (qc(mech))
Figure 7. Relationship between the fs(mech)/fs(elec) ratio and mechanical cone sleeve friction fs(mech)
386 A. ANAGNOSTOPOULOS ET AL.
Second, the electrical cone is able to better capture maximum and minimum
values when it encounters strata of higher and lower resistance, respectively.
Finally, significant influence is exerted by the structural characteristics of both
cones (e.g., the position of the resistance measurement ring) as well as the dif-
ferent kinds of disturbance they create in the soil.
5. Conclusions
The evaluation of the results of the Dutch cone penetration tests (using both
mechanical and electrical cones), which were carried out in different types of soils
in Greece, led to the formulation of empirical correlations with other in-situ and
laboratory tests.
According to the results of this work, the cone resistance as well as the sleeve fric-
tion exhibit a very good linear relationship with the undrained shear strength of
cohesive soils, as it has been also determined in previous studies. Furthermore, the
ratio of the cone resistance to the SPT values is related to the mean particle size
of soils; this relationship is quite similar to that initially suggested by Robertson
et al. (1983).
In addition, a linear relationship was found between the friction ratio, expressed as
the ratio of sleeve friction to the cone resistance, and the logarithmic value of the
mean particle size of soils. This finding is consistent with the results presented by
other authors.
The relationship between the small-strain shear modulus and the cone resistance
for Greek soils was found to be exponential, as also suggested by other authors.
However, the constant factors of that relationship are different from previously pub-
lished expressions.
Finally, the comparison between results obtained with mechanical and electrical
cones, reveals a discrepancy for the same soil types. This discrepancy is more
pronounced for low values of cone resistance. This could be attributed to the non-
continuous penetration of the mechanical cone, as well as to differences in the
construction of the two types of cones and the disturbance they cause in the soils
during penetration.
It must be noted that since this investigation covered a wide range of soils and the
number of test results was significant, the obtained empirical correlations can be con-
sidered as highly reliable for Greek soils. Moreover, the correlations can serve as a
basis for extending their applicability to other soils in the Mediterranean region and
other areas with comparable geological conditions and similar soil formations.
References
Anagnostopoulos, A. (1974), Evaluation of the undrained shear strength from static cone
penetration test in a soft silty clay in Patras, Greece, Proc. European Symposium on Pene-
tration Testing, Stockholm, 2.2, 13–14.
EMPIRICAL CORRELATIONS OF SOIL PARAMETERS 387
Baldi, G., Belloti, R., Ghiona, V. N., Jamiolkowski, M. and Pasqualini, E. (1986), Interpreta-
tion of CPT’s and CPTU’s – 2nd part: Drained penetration of sands, IV Int. Geot. Semin.
on Field Instrumentation and in Situ Measurements, Nayang Technological Inst.,
Singapore, pp. 143–156.
Begemann, H. K. S. Ph. (1965), The friction jacket cone as an aid in determining the soil
profile, Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engi-
neering, Montreal, 1, 17–20.
Bouckovalas, G., Kalteziotis, N., Sabatakakis, N. and Zervogiannis, H. (1989), Shear wave
velocity in a very soft clay – Measurements and correlations, Proc. of the Twelfth Interna-
tional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, 13–18
August, pp. 191–194.
Cancelli, A., Guadagnini, R. and Pellegrini, M. (1982), Friction – cone – penetration testing in
alluvial soils, Proc. 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, 2,
513–518.
Douglas, B. J. and Olsen, R. S. (1981), Soil classification using electric cone penetrometer.
Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, Proc. of the ASCE National Convention, St.
Louis, 209-27, American Society of Engineers (ASCE).
Drnevich, V. P., Gorman, C. T. and Hopkins, T. C. (1974), Shear strength of cohesive soils
and friction sleeve resistance, Proc. European Symposium on Penetration Testing,
Stockholm, 2.2, 129–133.
Jamiolkowski, M., Ghionna, V. N., Lancellotta, R. and Pasqualini, E. (1988), New correla-
tions of penetration tests for design practice, Proc. 1st International Symposium on Pene-
tration Testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando, 1, 263–296.
Koukis, G., Tsiambaos, G. and Sabatakakis, N. (1997), Correlations of mechanical character-
istics and classification of soil units of Patras city, Proc. of 3rd Hellenic Congress in
Geotechnical Engin., Patras, 1 (in Greek), 121–127.
Lunne, T., Robertson, P. K. and Powell, J. J. M. (1997), Cone Penetration Testing in Geotech-
nical Practice, Blackie Academic Professional, p. 312.
Meyerhof, G. G. (1974), Penetration testing outside Europe. General Report, Proc. European
Symposium on Penetration Testing, Stockholm, 2.2, 40–48.
Muromachi, T. (1981), Cone penetration testing in Japan, Proc. Symposium on Cone Penetra-
tion Testing and Experience, Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, St. Louis,
Missouri, pp. 49–75.
Robertson, P. K., Campanella, R. G., and Wightman, A. (1983), SPT–CPT correlations,
Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 109, GT11, 1449–1459.
Robertson, P. K. and Campanella, R. G. (1983), Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part
I. Sand, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20(4), 718–733.
Thorburn, S. and Mac Vicar, R. S. L. (1970), Discussion on paper by Thorburn and Mac
Vicar, Proc. Conference on Behaviour of Piles, Institution of Civil Engineers, London,
pp. 53–54.
Tsiambaos, G. (1991), Correlation of mineralogy and index properties with residual strength
of Iraklion marls, Engineering Geology, 30, 357–369.
Zervogiannis, H., Bouckovalas, G. and Christoulas, St. (1987), Correlation of mechanical
characteristics and classification of soil deposits. Bulletin of Central Public Works Labora-
tory, 4, October–December (in Greek), 255–265.
Zervogiannis, H. and Kalteziotis, N. (1988), Experience and relationships from penetration
testing in Greece, Proc. 1st International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1,
Orlando, 2, 1063–1071.