Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Global Stability Without Sickness
Global Stability Without Sickness
Research Article
Keywords: Dengue fractional-order model, Caputo-Fabrizio, Existence and Uniqueness, Offspring rate and
its stability
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2618914/v1
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read Full License
Keywords
Dengue fractional-order model, Caputo-Fabrizio, Existence and Uniqueness, Offspring rate and
its stability.
1. Introduction
Dengue fever expanded throughout Southeast Asia and the rest of the world, especially in
nations with tropical climates [1, 2]. There is a crucial urgency for further information regarding
raising awareness of dengue fever since this widespread disease has been related to climate
change. Recently, many nations throughout the world have experienced a serious health issue
related to this fatal disease. In the past few decades, analysis and study of mathematical models,
particularly those of dengue disease, have increased [3–5]. Due to mathematical system and
analysis we can empathize how disease can affect those who are vulnerable and recuperating
from infection. Fractional calculus is a powerful technique for simulating these kinds of
occurrences. Non-integer systems are better able to predict infection patterns since they have
knowledge of both the previous and present stages. As a result, adopting the fractional-order
derivative will help in better understanding and exploring the dynamical behavior of epidemic
diseases.
2. Mathematical preliminarily
𝑡−𝜏
The exponential kernel [24], is referred to as 𝜅(𝑡, 𝜏) = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 [−𝓹 1−𝓹]
Definition 2.1
Consider 𝜗 ∈ ℋ ′ (0, 𝓉) for 𝓉 > 0, the fractional-order derivative of Caputo- Fabrizio is given as
𝐶𝐹 𝓅 [𝜗(𝓉)] 𝒰(𝓅) 𝓉
0𝐷𝓉 =
1−𝓅
∫0 𝜗 ′ (𝓅) 𝒦(𝓉, 𝜏) 𝑑𝜏 (1)
Where 𝒰(𝓅) represents a normality that satisfies the condition 𝒰(0) = 𝒰(1) = 1 and
𝓅 ∈ [0,1].
Definition 2.2
𝐶𝐹 𝓅 [𝜗(𝓉)] 2(1−𝓅) 2𝓅 𝓉
0𝐼𝓉 =
(2−𝓅)𝒰(𝓅)
𝜗(𝓉) + ∫ 𝜗(𝜉)
(2−𝓅)𝒰(𝓅) 0
𝑑𝜉, (2)
𝓅 ҡ𝜗 ′ (𝑥,ҡ)−𝜗0 (𝑥)
ℒ( 𝐶𝐹0𝐷𝓉 𝜗(𝓉), ҡ) = (3)
ҡ+𝓅(1−ҡ)
3. Model Formulation
𝛽𝓋 (p, 𝓆) = 𝛽𝓋 p𝓆 + 𝛽𝓋 (1 − p)
We consider the perpetual parameter 𝛽𝓋 (p, 𝓆) = 𝛽𝓋 , where 𝑝 is the mosquito net using
human proportion and 𝓆 is the mosquito net quality. Notably, the parameters 𝓅 and 𝓆 are
constrained in the frame [0,1]. Human and mosquito fatalities rates are 𝛿𝒽 and 𝛿𝓋 ,
respectively; however, mosquito mortality can also attributed to insect repellents which has the
rating ϒ. Let human heal proportion be 𝜚 and let recuperating individuals becoming vulnerability
rate Ω .
𝑑𝑠𝒽 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 (p,𝓆) 𝑆𝒽 𝐼𝓋
𝑑𝑡
= 𝜑𝒽 – 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
– 𝛿𝒽 𝑆𝒽 + Ω ℛ𝒽 (4)
𝑑𝐼𝒽 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 (p,𝓆) 𝑆𝒽 𝐼𝓋
𝑑𝑡
= 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
– 𝜚𝐼𝒽 – 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝒽 (5)
𝑑ℛ𝒽
𝑑𝑡
= 𝜚 𝐼𝒽 − Ω ℛ𝒽 − 𝛿𝒽 ℛ𝒽 (6)
𝑑𝑆𝓋 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 (p,𝓆) 𝑆𝓋 𝐼𝒽
= 𝜑𝓋 − − 𝛿𝓋 𝑆𝓋 − ϒ 𝑆𝓋 (7)
𝑑𝑡 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝑑𝐼𝑣 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 (p,𝓆) 𝑆𝓋 𝐼𝒽
= − 𝛿𝓋 𝐼𝓋 − ϒ𝐼𝓋 (8)
𝑑𝑡 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
Since we presume that the actual number of people and mosquitoes will remain constant in the
absence of insecticides intervention, we utilize that
𝑑(𝑆𝒽 + 𝐼𝒽 + 𝑅𝒽 ) 𝑑𝒩𝒽
= = 𝜑𝒽 − 𝛿𝒽 𝒩𝒽 , 𝜑𝒽 − 𝛿𝒽 𝒩𝒽 = 0,
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡
𝜑𝒽
Which provide us 𝒩𝒽 = 𝛿𝒽
that is 𝜑𝒽 = 𝛿𝒽 𝒩𝒽 . On the other side for mosquito inhabitants,
we obtain
𝑑(𝑆𝓋 + 𝐼𝓋 ) 𝑑𝒩𝓋
= = 𝜑𝓋 − 𝛿𝓋 𝒩𝓋 , 𝜑𝓋 − 𝛿𝓋 𝒩𝓋 = 0,
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡
𝜑𝓋
Which offer 𝒩𝓋 = that is 𝜑𝓋 = 𝛿𝓋 𝒩𝓋 . When ϒ ≠ 0, we posses that
𝛿𝓋
𝑑(𝑆𝓋 +𝐼𝓋 ) 𝑑𝒩
= 𝑑𝑡𝓋 = 𝜑𝓋 − 𝛿𝓋 𝒩𝓋 − ϒ 𝒩𝓋 = −ϒ 𝒩𝓋 < 0, This shows mosquito populations
𝑑𝑡
decline over time.
𝓅 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝒽 𝐼𝓋
CF
𝐷𝑡 𝐼𝒽 = – 𝜚𝐼𝒽 – 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝒽 (10)
𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝓅
CF
𝐷𝑡 ℛ𝒽 = 𝜚𝐼𝒽 − Ω ℛ𝒽 − 𝛿𝒽 ℛ𝒽 (11)
𝓅 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝓋 𝐼𝒽
CF
𝐷𝑡 𝑆𝓋 = 𝜑𝓋 − − 𝛿𝓋 𝑆𝓋 − ϒ 𝑆𝓋 (12)
𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝓅 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝓋 𝐼𝒽
CF
𝐷𝑡 𝐼𝓋 = − 𝛿𝓋 𝐼𝓋 − ϒ 𝐼𝓋 (13)
𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
Table 1
The equilibrium point 𝐸 0 = (𝑆𝒽0 , 𝐼𝒽0 , 𝑅𝒽0 , 𝑆𝓋0 , 𝐼𝓋0 ), which is absent of dengue disease, is therefore
given by:
𝜑𝒽 𝜑𝓋
𝐸0 = ( , 0, 0, , 0).
𝛿𝒽 𝛿𝓋 + ϒ
The fractional order dengue fever model (9)-(13) endemic equilibrium point is given by
∗
E = (𝑆𝒽∗ , 𝐼𝒽∗ , 𝑅𝒽∗ , 𝑆𝓋∗ , 𝐼𝓋∗ )
Where
(𝜚+ 𝛿𝒽 )(𝜑𝒽 +Ω ℛ𝒽 )(𝒩𝒽 +𝒜)ℰ3
𝑆𝒽∗ = ℰ2 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋
ℰ1 (𝜑𝒽 + Ω ℛ𝒽 )
𝐼𝒽∗ =
ℰ2
∗ ϱ(𝜑𝒽 + Ω ℛ𝒽 )ℰ1
ℛ𝒽 =
(Ω + 𝛿𝒽 )ℰ2
Here ℰ1 = 𝜑𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝛼𝒽 𝜒1 − 𝜒2 𝜒3 ,
ℰ2 = 𝜑𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝛼𝒽 𝜒1 − 𝜒2 𝜒3 + 𝜒3 (𝜒1 + 𝜒2 ),
ℰ3 = 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 (𝛿𝓋 + ϒ)(𝜒1 + 𝜒2 ),
𝜒1 = 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 (𝜑𝒽 + Ωℛ𝒽 ) ,
The model’s uniqueness and existence solution has been established and demonstrated in
the following lemma.
𝐶𝐹 𝑝
𝑡0 𝐷𝑡 𝑥(𝓉) = 𝑢(𝓉, 𝑥), 𝓉0 > 0, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥(𝓉0 ) = 𝑥0 (14)
The system (3.2) has a singular solution in the interval [𝑡0 , ∞) × ℜ , if the function 𝑢(𝑡, 𝑥), satisfies
Lipschitz condition w. r. to 𝑥.
Proof
Consider the region [𝑡0 , 𝒫] × ℜ where, ℜ = {(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧) 𝜖 ℝ3 : max {|𝑆𝒽 |, |𝐼𝒽 |, |ℛ𝒽 |} ≤ 𝒬}. Let
𝑋 = (𝑆𝒽 , 𝐼𝒽 , ℛ𝒽 ) and 𝑌 = (𝑆𝒽1 , 𝐼𝒽1 , ℛ𝒽1 ) be arbitrary two points in the region ℜ and define the
mapping 𝐻: ℜ → ℝ3 , by 𝐻(𝑋) = (𝐻1 , 𝐻2 , 𝐻3 ), where
𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝒽 𝐼𝓋 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝒽 𝐼𝓋
𝐻1 = 𝜑𝒽 – – 𝛿𝒽 𝑆𝒽 + Ω ℛ𝒽 , 𝐻2 = – 𝜚𝐼𝒽 – 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝒽 and
𝒩𝒽 +𝒜 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝐻3 = 𝜚𝐼𝒽 − Ω ℛ𝒽 − 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝒽 .
𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝒽 𝐼𝓋 𝛼 𝛽 𝑆 𝐼
=|(𝜑𝒽 – – 𝛿𝒽 𝑆𝒽 + Ω ℛ𝒽 ) − (𝜑𝒽 – 𝒽 𝓋 𝒽1 𝓋1 – 𝛿𝒽 𝑆𝒽1 + Ω ℛ𝒽1 )| +
𝒩𝒽 +𝒜 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝛼 𝛽 (𝓅,𝓆) 𝑆 𝐼 𝛼 𝛽 (𝓅,𝓆) 𝑆 𝐼
|( 𝒽 𝓋𝒩 +𝒜 𝒽 𝓋 – 𝜚𝐼𝒽 – 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝒽 ) − ( 𝒽 𝓋 𝒩 +𝒜𝒽1 𝓋1 – 𝜚𝐼𝒽1 – 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝒽1 )| + |(𝜚𝐼𝒽 − Ω ℛ𝒽 − 𝛿𝒽 ℛ𝒽 ) −
𝒽 𝒽
(𝜚𝐼𝒽1 − Ω ℛ𝒽1 − 𝛿𝒽 ℛ𝒽1 )|
2𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋
≤ | 𝑆𝒽 𝐼𝓋 − 𝑆𝒽1 𝐼𝓋1 | + 2 𝜚|𝐼𝒽 − 𝐼𝒽1 | + 2 Ω| ℛ𝒽 − ℛ𝒽1 | + 𝛿𝒽 | 𝑆𝒽 − 𝑆𝒽1 |
𝒩𝒽 + 𝒜
+ 𝛿𝒽 | 𝐼𝒽 − 𝐼𝒽1 | + 𝛿𝒽 | ℛ𝒽 − ℛ𝒽1 |
.
2𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋
≤( 𝒬 + 𝛿𝒽 ) | 𝑆𝒽 − 𝑆𝒽1 | + (2 𝜚 + 𝛿𝒽 )|𝐼𝒽 − 𝐼𝒽1 | + (2Ω + 𝛿𝒽 )| ℛ𝒽 − ℛ𝒽1 |
𝒩𝒽 + 𝒜
2𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋
≤ 𝐾‖𝑋 − 𝑌‖, where 𝐾 =max { 𝒬 + 𝛿𝒽 , 2 𝜚 + 𝛿𝒽 , 2Ω + 𝛿𝒽 }
𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
As a result, the function 𝐻(𝑋) fulfils the requirements of the Lipschitz criterion for 𝑋 =
(𝑆𝒽 , 𝐼𝒽 , ℛ𝒽 ) 𝜖 ℜ and hence it leads to the exisitence and uniqueness of the solution of system
(9)-(13).
Our primary focus on our system is on solution’s non-negative and boundedness. Now
consider the regions ℜ+ = {(𝑆𝒽 , 𝐼𝒽 , ℛ𝒽 ) 𝜖 ℜ: 𝑆𝒽 , 𝐼𝒽 , ℛ𝒽 𝜖ℝ+3 } are taken into consideration.
Theorem 4.2
The solution of the fractional-order system (9) – (13) is non-negative and bounded.
Proof
≤ 𝜑𝒽 as 𝑁𝒽 ≥ 0
Thus, the quantity of affected individuals will decline of CF𝐷𝑡𝑝 𝐼𝒽 (𝑡) ≤ 0, while disease rates will
𝑝
rise if CF𝐷𝑡 𝐼𝒽 (𝑡) > 0, leading to an expansive epidemic.
As a consequence, every solution to the fractional-order system (9) – (13) whose initial
conditions begin in the region ℜ+ is bounded and located in the region {(𝑆𝒽 + 𝐼𝒽 +
𝜑𝒽
ℛ 𝒽 ) 𝜖 ℜ + : 𝑆 𝒽 + 𝐼𝒽 + ℛ 𝒽 ≤ }.
𝛿𝒽
−𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝐼𝓋 – 𝛿𝒽 0 Ω 0 − 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝒽
𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝐼𝓋 −𝜚 − 𝛿𝒽 0 0 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝒽
J= 0 𝜚 −Ω − 𝛿𝒽 0 0 (15)
0 −𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝓋 0 −𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝐼𝒽 −𝛿𝓋 − ϒ 0
( 0 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝓋 0 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝐼𝒽 −𝛿𝓋 − ϒ )
By focusing on the without sickness equilibrium values for the System (9)-(13) is
𝜑𝒽 𝜑𝓋
𝐸0 = ( , 0, 0, 𝛿 , 0) , we form the below matrix
𝛿𝒽 𝓋 +ϒ
– 𝛿𝒽 0 Ω 0 − 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝒽 ⁄ 𝛿𝒽
0 −𝜚 − 𝛿𝒽 0 0 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝒽 ⁄ 𝛿𝒽
0) 0 𝜚 −Ω − 𝛿𝒽 0 0
J(𝐸 = (16)
0 −𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝓋 ⁄𝛿𝓋 + ϒ 0 −𝛿𝓋 − ϒ 0
( 0 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝓋 ⁄𝛿𝓋 + ϒ 0 0 −𝛿𝓋 − ϒ )
For the above matrix to find the eigen value |J – λI|, which is
− 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆 0 Ω 0 − 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝒽 ⁄ 𝛿𝒽
0 −𝜚 − 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆 0 0 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝒽 ⁄ 𝛿𝒽
| |
|J – λI| = 0 𝜚 −Ω − 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆 0 0 (17)
| |
0 −𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝓋 ⁄𝛿𝓋 + ϒ 0 −𝛿𝓋 − ϒ − 𝜆 0
( 0 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝓋 ⁄𝛿𝓋 + ϒ 0 0 −𝛿𝓋 − ϒ − 𝜆 )
−𝜚 − 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆 0 0 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝒽 ⁄ 𝛿𝒽
𝜚 −Ω − 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆 0 0
|J − λI| = (− 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆) | |
−𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝓋 𝛿𝓋 + ϒ
⁄ 0 −𝛿𝓋 − ϒ − 𝜆 0
( 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝜑𝓋 ⁄𝛿𝓋 + ϒ 0 0 −𝛿𝓋 − ϒ − 𝜆 )
(18)
𝛼𝒽 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 2 𝜑𝒽 𝜑𝓋
(− 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆)(−Ω − 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆)(−(𝛿𝓋 + ϒ) − 𝜆). [(−𝜚 − 𝛿𝒽 − 𝜆)(−𝛿𝓋 − ϒ − 𝜆) − ]=0
𝛿𝒽 (𝛿𝓋 + ϒ)
(19)
We get the eigen values 𝜆1 = −𝛿𝒽 , 𝜆2 = −(𝛿𝓋 + ϒ) , 𝜆3 = −(Ω + 𝛿𝒽 ) and the characteristic
equation is
𝛼𝒽 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 2 𝜑𝒽 𝜑𝓋
𝜆2 + (𝜚 + 𝛿𝒽 + 𝛿𝓋 + ϒ)𝜆 + [(𝜚 + 𝛿𝒽 )(𝛿𝓋 + ϒ) − ]=0 (20)
𝛿𝒽 (𝛿𝓋 +ϒ)
From the equation (19) we derived the rate off spring rate ℛ0 for the our system (9) – (13),
𝛼𝒽 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 2 𝜑𝒽 𝜑𝓋
ℛ0 = √ 2
𝛿𝒽 (𝛿𝓋 + ϒ) (𝜚 + 𝛿𝒽 )
Theorem 4.3
The point of without sickness equilibrium 𝐸 0 is global stability if ℛ0 < 1 while ℛ0 > 1, then
𝐸 0 will be unstable.
Proof
If the above condition (15-20) is fulfilled by each of the Jacobian matrix singular values
0
𝐽(𝐸 ) with eigenvales 𝜆𝑖 , i = 1,2,3,4,5. Afterwards without sickness equilibrium is locally
feasible.
𝛼𝜋
|arg (𝜆𝑖 )| >
2
The Jacobian matrix 𝐽(𝐸 0 ) eigen value are 𝜆1 = −𝛿𝒽 , 𝜆2 = −(𝛿𝓋 + ϒ) and 𝜆3 = −(Ω + 𝛿𝒽 ), the
quadratic equation produces the other two roots
𝛼𝒽 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 2 𝜑𝒽 𝜑𝓋
Where ℛ0 = √𝛿 2 (𝜚+ 𝛿
𝒽 (𝛿𝓋 +ϒ) 𝒽)
Hence the characteristic polynomial has only negative eigen value when ℛ0 < 1 and the Eigen
𝛼𝜋
values finally abide by the requirements |arg (𝜆𝑖 )| > for i = 1,2,3,4,5.
2
As a result, globally the disease free equilibrium is approximately normal when ℛ0 < 1 and is
instability otherwise.
5. Numerical Simulations
( 𝒿) 𝓉𝒿 1 𝓉
ℊ(𝓉) = ∑𝑚−1
𝒿=0 ℊ0 + ∫ (𝓉 − 𝓈)𝓅−1 𝜗(𝓈, 𝑦(𝓈))𝑑𝓈. (21)
𝒿! ᴦ(𝓅) 0
The fractional order dengue epidemic model was developed by Diethelm et al. with parameters
𝜇 = 𝑇⁄𝒩 , 𝓉𝓃 = 𝓃𝜇, and 𝓃 = 0, 1, 2, . . . , 𝒩 ∈ 𝑍 + , (19) could be splitted as follows [24]
𝑝 𝑝
𝜇𝓅 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝑛+1 𝑌𝑛+1 𝑝 𝑝
𝑆𝓃+1 = 𝑆0 + (𝜑𝒽 – – 𝛿𝒽 𝑆𝑛+1 + Ωℛ𝑛+1 )
ᴦ(𝓅+2) 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝜇𝓅 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 S𝓀 Y𝓀
+ ᴦ(𝓅+2) ∑𝓃
𝓀=0 𝑎𝓀,𝓃+1 (𝜑𝒽 – 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
– 𝛿𝒽 S𝓀 + Ωℛ𝓀 )
𝑝 𝑝
𝜇𝓅 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 𝑆𝑛+1 𝑌𝑛+1 𝑝 𝑝
𝐼𝑛+1 = 𝐼0 + ( – 𝜚𝐼𝑛+1 – 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝑛+1 )
ᴦ(𝓅+2) 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝜇𝓅 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 S𝓀 Y𝓀
+ ᴦ(𝓅+2) ∑𝓃
𝓀=0 𝑎𝓀,𝓃+1 ( – 𝜚𝐼𝓀 – 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝓀 )
𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝜇𝓅 𝑝 𝑝 𝑝
ℛ𝑛+1 = ℛ0 + (𝜚𝐼𝑛+1 − Ωℛ𝑛+1 − 𝛿𝒽 ℛ𝑛+1 )
ᴦ(𝓅+2)
𝜇𝓅
+ ∑𝓃
𝓀=0 𝑎𝓀,𝓃+1 (𝜚𝐼𝓀 − Ωℛ𝓀 − 𝛿𝒽 ℛ𝓀 )
ᴦ(𝓅+2)
𝑝 𝑝
𝜇𝓅 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝑋𝑛+1 𝐼𝑛+1 𝑝 𝑝
𝑋𝑛+1 = 𝑋0 + (𝜑𝓋 − − 𝛿𝓋 𝑋𝑛+1 − ϒ 𝑋𝑛+1 )
ᴦ(𝓅+2) 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝜇𝓅 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 X𝓀 I𝓀
+ ∑𝓃
𝓀=0 𝑎𝓀,𝓃+1 (𝜑𝓋 − − 𝛿𝓋 X 𝓀 − ϒ X 𝓀 )
ᴦ(𝓅+2) 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
𝑝 𝑝
𝜇𝓅 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 𝑋𝑛+1 𝐼𝑛+1 𝑝 𝑝
𝑌𝑛+1 = 𝑌0 + ᴦ(𝓅+2) ( 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
− 𝛿𝓋 𝑌𝑛+1 − ϒ 𝑌𝑛+1 )
𝜇𝓅 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 X𝓀 I𝓀
+ ∑𝓃
𝓀=0 𝑎𝓀,𝓃+1 ( − 𝛿𝓋 𝑌𝓀 − ϒ 𝑌𝓀 )
ᴦ(𝓅+2) 𝒩𝒽 +𝒜
Where
𝓃
𝑝 1 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 S𝓀 Y𝓀
𝑆𝑛+1 = 𝑆0 + ∑ 𝑏𝓀,𝓃+1 (𝜑𝒽 – – 𝛿𝒽 S𝓀 + Ωℛ𝓀 )
ᴦ(𝑝) 𝒩𝒽 + 𝒜
𝓀=0
𝓃
𝑝 1 𝛼𝒽 𝛽𝓋 S𝓀 Y𝓀
𝐼𝑛+1 = 𝐼0 + ∑ 𝑏𝓀,𝓃+1 ( – 𝜚𝐼𝓀 – 𝛿𝒽 𝐼𝓀 )
ᴦ(𝑝) 𝒩𝒽 + 𝒜
𝓀=0
𝓃
𝑝 1
ℛ𝑛+1 = ℛ0 + ∑ 𝑏𝓀,𝓃+1 (𝜚𝐼𝓀 − Ωℛ𝓀 − 𝛿𝒽 ℛ𝓀 )
ᴦ(𝑝)
𝓀=0
𝓃
𝑝 1 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 X 𝓀 I𝓀
X𝑛+1 = X0 + ∑ 𝑏𝓀,𝓃+1 (𝜑𝓋 − − 𝛿𝓋 X 𝓀 − ϒ X 𝓀 )
ᴦ(𝑝) 𝒩𝒽 + 𝒜
𝓀=0
𝓃
𝑝 1 𝛼𝓋 𝛽𝓋 X 𝓀 I𝓀
𝑌𝑛+1 = X0 + ∑ 𝑏𝓀,𝓃+1 ( − 𝛿𝓋 𝑌𝓀 − ϒ 𝑌𝓀 )
ᴦ(𝑝) 𝒩𝒽 + 𝒜
𝓀=0
Here, we simulate the dengue fever framed model numerically using the Caputo Fabrizio
operator. The model system (9)–(13) as provided above is solved using the Adams–Bashworth
technique [23, 24].
Table 2
According to NCVBDC (National Center for Vector Borne Disease Control) we have collected
the dengue disease infected patients and number of death statistics in the region Andra Pradesh
which is located at the country India has been shown in table 2.
We simulate the disease numerically. As fractional order increase the susceptible and infected
populations will fall, recovery populations will move up, and after the insect repellent
intervention, susceptible and infected mosquito populations will gradually reduce with different
fractional orders, as illustrated in figs. 2 – 4. Without insect repellents intervention, the infection
rates will rise, as seen in figures 5 – 7.
Figures 8 through 10 represent an infection simulation and show that the use of mosquito nets
reduces mosquito bites, significantly reducing the disease spread rate from people to mosquitoes
and from mosquitoes to individuals. A slight decline in human and mosquito infection is
accompanied by a fractional order increases. Even without the application of mosquito nets, as
considered by Figs. 11 to 12.
7. Conclusion
In this work, we have investigated the fractional-order dengue disease mathematical model
involving mosquito nets and repellents. We have adapted Caputo-Fabrizio operator on this
system for qualitative data analysis. Following this, we have analyzed the stability of the system
through its equilibrium points in which it exists only when ℛ0 < 1. The Lipchitz condition has
been applied to gain survival and oneness of results of the system. The Adams – Bashforth
scheme is hired to solve an approximate response of the fractional-order dengue model. The
numerical simulation we have shown here demonstrates that the collective effects of fractional
ordering, repellents, and mosquito net use reduces the quantity of infected mosquitoes and also
lowers the individual spending costs. These numerical simulations clearly show that when insect
repellents are not performed, a lot of healthy persons acquire the illness. Hence numerical
simulations prove the analytical results. Thus, we draw the conclusion that increasing in the
intensity of mosquito control measures will minimize the number of infected mosquitoes,
therefore saving human lives.
Reference
[3] East S (2016), World's dengue fever vaccine launched in the Philippines, CNN.
[4] Ahmad R., Suzilah I, Wan Nadjah W.M.A., Topek, O, Mustafakamal, I, Lee, H.L (2018).:
Factors determining dengue outbreak in Malaysia. PLOS ONE 13(2), e0193326.
[5] Derouich M, Boutayeb A, Twizell E.H (2013), A model of Dengue fever, Biomed. Eng.2 (1).
[6] Shen Y (2014), Mathematical Models of Dengue Fever and Measures to Control Ph.D
dissertation, Florida State University Libraries.
[7] Esteva L, Vargas V (1998), Analysis of a dengue disease transmission model, Math. Biosci.
150 (2) 131–151.
[8] Esteva L and Vargas C (1998), A model for dengue disease with variable human population,
J.Math. Biol., 38, 220-240.
[9] Barmak DH, Dorso CO and Otero M, Modelling dengue epidemic spreading with human
mobility, Physica A, 447 (2016), 129-140.
[10] Nuraini N, Soewong E and Sidarto KA, Mathematical model of dengue disease
transmission with severe DHF compartment, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 30 (2007), 143-157.
[11] Tang B, Xiao Y, Tang S and Wu J, Modelling weekly vector control against Dengue in the
Guangdong Province of China, J. Theor. Biol., 410 (2016), 65-76.
[12] Jan R and Jan A, MSGDTM for solution of fractional order dengue disease model, Interna-
tional Journal of Science and Research, 6 (2017), 1140-1144.
[13] El-Saka HAA (2014), The fractional-order SIS epidemic model with variable population
size, J. Egyptian. Math. Soci.22, 50–54.
[14] Guzman M.G, Kouri G, Bravo J, Valdes L, Vasquez S and Halstead S.B (2002), Effect of
age on outcome of secondary dengue infections, Int. J. Infect. Dis., 6 , 118-124.
[15] Jan R, Khan M.A and Gomez-Aguilar J.F (2020), Asymptomatic carriers in transmission
dynamics of dengue with control interventions, Optimal Control Applications and Methods.,41,
430-447.
[16] Aguiar M, Kooi BW, Martins J and Stollenwerk N, Scaling of stochasticity in dengue
hemorrhagic fever epidemics, Math. Model. Nat. Pheno., 7 (2012), 1-11.
[17] Chanprasopchai P, Ming Tang I, Pongsumpun P (2018), SIR model for Dengue disease
with effect of Dengue vaccination, Comput. Math. Meth. Med. 14. Article ID 9861572.
[18] Rida SZ, Abdel Rady AS, Arafa AMM, Khalil M (2012), Approximate analytical solution
of the fractional epidemic model, IJMR (1) 17–19.
[19] Khan A and Khan H (2019), Existence and Hyers-Ulam stability for a nonlinear singular
fractional differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos Solit. Fract. 127, 422–427.
[20] Khan A, Gomez-Aguilar JF, Khan TS, Khan H (2019) Stability analysis and numerical
solutions of fractional order HIV/AIDSmodel, Chaos Solit. Fract. 122, 119–128.
[21] Vijayalakshmi GM and Roselyn Besi. P (2022) “A fractal fractional order vaccination
model of COVID-19 pandemic using Adam’s moulton analysis.Results in Control and
Optimization”,doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2022.100144.
[22] Vijayalakshmi GM, Roselyn Besi. P (2022) “ABC Fractional order Vaccination model for
Covid-19 with self-protuctive measures” Int.J.Appl.Comput.Math ;130.doi.org/10.1007/s40819-
022-01316-2.
[23] Khalid K, Sultana M, Sami F (2015), Numerical solution of SIR model of Dengue fever,
Int. J. Comput. Appl. 118 (21) 1–10.
[24] Dengue/ DHF situation in india:: National Center for Vector Borne Disease Control
(NCVBDC), Ministry of health & family welfare, Government of India designed and developed
by center for health informations,https//nvbdcp.gov.in/index.
[25] Bevina D. Handari, Febyan Vitra, Radhiya Ahya, Tengku Nadya S. and Dipo Aldila,(2019)
“Optimal control in a malaria model:intervention of fumigation and bed nets” Handari et al.
Advances in Difference Equations :497,https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2424-6