Outcomes of Research

Activities

Resources/Research Tools Needed

Responsibility to Address Activities

Timeline

1- Provide students with motivational incentives to return NSLP forms (i.e.: External Person: Ginnie 1- Budget for incentive parties pizza party, ice cream party, off-site Harwood lunch for a day, etc.) Increased participation of students in NSLP applications 2- Workshop for food service Internal Persons: Food staff to know how to perform Service staff, PEIMS a sibling match on all received Coordinator NSLP applications

Start: September 2011

2- Implement a sibling match for all applications received

End: November 2012

Increased awareness of the significance of NLSP applications on educational technology and ERate for families of students

1- Setup a table/booth at registration 1- Balloons or something for NSLP applications and impart the attractive for registration importance of these forms table/booth

External Person: Ginnie Harwood

Start: September 2011

2Host PTA meetings, open houses, student/teacher conferences to discuss the effects of NSLP participation 1- Counsel students on the positive impact of NSLP data on their digital learning and robust technology

2- Hand out literature or fliers to inform parents of the after school meetings

Internal Persons: Teachers, Principals, Counselors, Technology Director

End: November 2012

External Person: Ginnie Harwood Visual aids for PEP rally or student assembly that will depict the purpose of the NSLP application and how it will affect the students in the long run

Start: September 2011

Help students overcome the stigma that is associated with participating in the NSLP program

Visual aids for PEP rally or student assembly that will Help students overcome the 2- Explain to students in PEP rallies or depict the purpose of the NSLP stigma that is associated with other student assembly's that NSLP application and how it will participating in the NSLP program data must show who is eligible for affect the students in the long free and/or reduced lunches and not run who participates 3- Make students see that they don't necessarily have to change their eating habits or locations in order to participate 1- Survey forms and stamps for mailings

Internal Persons: Couselors, Teachers, Coaches, End: November, Principals, Technology 2012 Director

2- Stamped return envelopes

External Person: Ginnie Harwood Internal Persons: Administration, PEIMS Coordinator, Technology Director

Start: September 2011

Deploy surveys as an alternate mechanism for attaining NSLP data

Create NSLP surveys to send out to 3- Log of students who families for those that are resistant to returned the forms disclosing their annual incomes 4Proof from postmark to show the surveys reached 100% of families 5- Date stamp and/or register of received surveys

End: November, 2012

Benchmarks/Assessment

Revisions to SIP/PIP based on monitoring and assessments

1. Facilitate the CARE model between identified team to examine improvement and feedback.

2. Compare PEIMS reports from Fall 2010 submission and Fall 2011 Submission

1. Facilitate the CARE model between identified team to examine improvement and feedback.

2. Evaluation of attendance at solicited meetings

1. Facilitate the CARE model between identified team to examine improvement and feedback.

2. Evaluation and comparison of PEIMS reports of 2010 Fall submission and 2011 Fall Submission

Evaluation of participation in surveys- if the survey yields at least a 50% return, you can extrapolate that figure to represent 100% of students (there are measures to prove these provisions are met)