Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project M
Recovered 30 million up to 2 year and unrecovered amt is 20 million
therefore to recovered 20 million how many month required
12 m=32 million so to recover 20 million 7.5 months
0.625 years
Payback pe2.63 years
Payback pe
( C) M N
Initial outlay -50 -50
1 11 38
2 19 22
3 32 18
4 37 10
NPV 21.26 20.63
Accept all poject in case of independent project
( d) M N
Initial outlay -50 -50
1 11 38
2 19 22
3 32 18
4 37 10
NPV 25.02 23.08
In case of mutually exclusive project accept the project which has higher NPV so we reject project N
( e) M N
Initial outlay -50 -50
1 11 38
2 19 22
3 32 18
4 37 10
NPV 16.13 17.23
If discount rate change in that case Project N will accept and project M will reject( in case of mutually ex
which requires an initial outlay of Rs 50 million.The expected cash inflows from these projects ar
Points to remember
Independent projThe acceptance of one project does not effect the cash flow of other projec
Mutually exclusivTwo project are mutually exclusive then the acceptance of one project reje
12
Project N
Recovered 38 million in 1st year and unrecovered amt is 12 million
to recoved 12 milliom how many months required
6.545455 months
0.545455 years
Payback pe 1.55 year
d on payback period
Points to remember
Independent projThe acceptance of one project does not effect the cash flow of other projec
Mutually exclusivTwo project are mutually exclusive then the acceptance of one project reje
so we reject project N
( ii)
(iii)
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
(iv)
(v )
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
•Average/Accounting Rate of Return
•(Annual Average Earnings After Tax/Average Investment) x 100
•Annual Av. Earnings after Tax = Earnings after depreciation and tax/Total peri
•Av. Investment (each year) = (Op. Investment + Cl. Investment)/2
•Av. Investment (for Project Period) = (Av. Investment 1 + Av. Investment2 + …
•Investment includes Working Capital
In case SLM for Depreciation is used Av. Investment = Working Capital + Salvag
12m = 41000
for 6000 1.756098 months
0.146341 years
Payback period 4.15 years
LR 5% 14909.83
HR 10% -999.4
IRR 9.69% (approx) by trial and error method
9.65% =IRR(H61:H66)
ment) x 100
ciation and tax/Total period of Project
nvestment)/2
nt 1 + Av. Investment2 + …..Av. Investment n)/n
Suggest the most attractive proposal on the basis of the NPV method considering that the future incomes are disco
uture incomes are discounted at 12%.Also find out the IRR of the two proposal
Initial Cash outflows= Cost of new plant+Installation exp+other capital expenditure+Additio
Terminal Cash inflows Annual Cash inflow+Working capital released+Scrap value of the pro
Basic Principles for calculation of cash flows 1. All relevant cash flows are considered.
2. Cash flows are considered on after- tax basis.
3.Cash flows are considered on incremental basis.
4.Tax saving is considered as an inflows.
5.Sunk costs are ignored( as these are not incremental)
6. Opportunity costs are considered ( as these are sacrificed)
7. Additional working capital required for a project is considered as a
At the end of life of project,these funds(blocked in working capital) a
8.Unless given otherwise,inflows are assumed to have occurred at th
9.In Replacement decisions,savings in costs are considered as inflows
10.Allocated overhaeds are not outflows( as these are not increment
Cash flows from the point of view Capital budgeting propsal are considered and evaluated from the po
apital expenditure+Additional working capital-Tax benefits on account of capital loss on sale of old plant (if any)-salvage value of old plant
incremental)
hese are sacrificed)
a project is considered as an outflow( as the funds are blocked for the life time of the project).
ocked in working capital) are released back and are considered as Terminal inflows.
med to have occurred at the end of the year and outflows are assumed to have occurred in the beginning of the year.
s are considered as inflows on the after- tax basis.
as these are not incremental and are being already recovered elsewhere
he production.
stment(cash outflow) and the incremental cash inflows,that result from the replacement action are to be as
h inflows of the new asset LESS the cash inflows of the existing asset.
nt action are to be ascertained
ABC ltd whose required rate of return is 10% is considering to replace one of its plants by the new plant.
Particular
Present book value/cost
Remaining life (years)
Depreciation(p.a)
Salvage value(current)
Profit before depreciation and tax(annual)
Tax rate
Capital Gain/Loss
Initial outflow
Cost of proposed plant
current scrap value of existing plant
Net cash outflow
NPV
PVIFA
Initial outflow
NPV
is 10% is considering to replace one of its plants by the new plant.The relevant data for the existing plant as well as the proposed plant are
54000
20000
34000
Particular
Purchase price of the new asset
Installation costs
Increase in working capital in year Zero
Scrap value of the new assets after 4 years
Revenue from new asset( Annual )
Cash expenses on new asset(annual)
Current book value(old assets)
Present scrap value (old assets)
Revenue from old assets( annual)
Cash expenses on old(annual)
Planning period, 4 years
Depreciation on new assets:- 92% the cost s to be depreciated in the ratio of 5:8:6:4 over 4 years.
Existing asset is depreciated at a rate of ₹ 100000 p.a
Evaluate the replacement of old assets given that tax rate is 40% on both revenue as well as capital gains/losses an
Solution:- Calculation of Initial cashoutflow
Purchase price of new assets
Installation cost
Working capital required
Sale of old assets
Tax on capital gain on old assets
Total Initial outflow
Cash flows
PV of cash flow @ 10%
Total PV of cash flow
Initial cash outflow
NPV
Proposal should be accepted
Amt (₹)
1000000
200000
250000
350000
2150000
950000
400000
500000
1925000
1125000
1000000
200000
250000
-500000 Book value(old assets 400000
40000 Sale of old assets 500000
990000 Capital gain 100000
Capital gain tax @40 40000
1 Calculation of Depreciation
Depreciation on new machine
Depreciation Rate (33.33% WDV)
Year Dep CB Incremental dep
1 400000 133320 266680 115320
2 266680 88884 177796 74484.44
3 177796 59259 118536 47739.26
4 118536 39508 79028 30292.15
5 79028 26340 52688 18967.28
Depreciation on old machine
year DepreciaCB
1 90000 18000 72000
2 72000 14400 57600
3 57600 11520 46080
4 46080 9216 36864
5 36864 7372.8 29491.2
with the replacement of an old machine by a new machine.The old machine bought
ge value is expected to be nil.It is being depreciated annually at the rate of 20%(WDV
h ₹ 250000 after five years when it will no longer be required.It will be depreciated an
elevant cash flows for this replacement decision.(Tax on capital gain/loss to be ingor
5 years
Example
Old machine Manufacturing cost
New machine manufacturing cost
Incremental cash inflows/saving
Year4 Year5
100000 100000
30292 18967
69708 81033
34854 40516
34854 40516
30292 18967
65146 59484
250000
65146 309484
250000 at the end of 5th year when new machine will be scrapped
the end of 5th year(59484+250000= 309483.64
can be sold for ₹ 90000.It can be sold for ₹90000
250000
150000
100000
ABC Ltd is considering to install a machine co
of ₹ 2000000 in the first year and the sales a
the cash flows generated by the machine giv
1. The machine is depreciated as per straight
2. The additional working capital is required
Working note:-
1 Calculation of Depreciation
Machine cost 500000
Installation c 150000
Salvage valu 250000
Depreciation 40000
Remaining lif 10
2 Calculation of working capital
eable year 10
Terminal Value
ash flows Salvage value 250000
Working capit 155133
Regular cash 350266
Terminal valu 755398
Terminal value
apital for a year depend upon the sales of the year and its required in the beginning
ate a sales revenue
be 5% of the sales.Find out
d in the beginning of the year.
A company proposes to manufacture a new product by installing a machine costing Rs 30 Lakhs .The machine has a
The scrap value of the machine at the end of its life is expected to be Rs 6 lakhs.The project will require infusion of
at the end of year 5.It is also estimated that a sum of Rs 3 will have to be spent in the first year of operations as pro
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Cash flow(Rs) 11 14 18 17 9
The company tax rate is 30% and the cost of capital is 15%.Evaluate the proposal and advise the management whet
Salvage value
WDV 9.8304
Salvage value 6
Net loss 3.8304
Tax shield 1.14912
Total inflow 7.14912
4 5
17 9
3.072 2.4576
13.928 6.5424
0 0
13.928 6.5424
4.1784 1.96272
9.7496 4.57968
3.072 2.4576
12.8216 7.03728
5
7.14912
12.8216 19.1864
0.571753 0.497177
7.330791 9.539032
t the project
depreciation and tax
The Bombay Petroleum Ltd (BPL) has a retail outlet of petrol, diesel and petrole
lead petrol and one for diesel. Free air filling is carried out for vehicles buying fu
value as the underground tank will be completely corroded and unfit for reuse.
The BPL sells petrol and diesel @ Rs 23 and Rs 10 per litre respectively. The exis
percent as commission on sales. For petrol pump Commission on sales is the on
Due to a manifold increase in traffic, the existing pumps are not able to meet th
additional pumps for diesel and petrol at a cost of Rs 10,00,000 together with a
is same as of the existing pumps. The additional sales of petrol and diesel are ex
of the installation of the new pump, the operating cost would increase by Rs 24
additional costs are estimated to be: insurance @ 1 per cent of the cost of the p
Bombay Petroleum Ltd pays 35 per cent on tax on its income. Depreciation will
The management of BPL seeks your advice on the financial viability of the expa
Initial cost
Cost of new pump 1000000
Additional working capital 500000
Total outflow 1500000
Subsequent cash inflows (Incremental cash flows)
Years 1
Revenue (Commission)
Petrol 184000
Diesel 40000
Total Revenue 224000
Less:- Cost
Salary -24000
Insurance cost 1% of cost -10000
Maintenance cost -12000
Power cost -13000
Depreciation *1 -100000
PBT 65000
Tax 35% 22750
PAT 42250
Add:-Depreciation 100000
Cash flows 142250
Working capital recovered
Annual cash flows 142250
PV of Cash flow@ 12% 127008.928571429
Total PV 964730.844086793
PV of cash outflow -1500000
NPV -535269.155913207
Since NPV is negative so reject the project
of petrol, diesel and petroleum products. Presently, it has two pumps exclusively for petrol, on
ed out for vehicles buying fuel from the outlet. The pumps have a useful life of 10 years with no
orroded and unfit for reuse.
er litre respectively. The existing annual sale is, petrol 5 lakh litres and diesel 2 lakh litres. Its ear
ommission on sales is the only source of revenue.
mps are not able to meet the demand during peak hours. The BPL is contemplating installation
s 10,00,000 together with additional working capital of Rs 5,00,000. The useful life of the additi
es of petrol and diesel are expected to be 2 lakh litres and 1 lakh litres per annum respectively.
ost would increase by Rs 24,000 annually by way of salary of the pump operator. Other yearly a
per cent of the cost of the pump, maintenance cost, Rs 12,000 and power costs, Rs 13,000.
s income. Depreciation will be on straight line basis and the same is allowed for tax purposes.
nancial viability of the expansion proposal, assuming 12 percent required rate of return. Kindly
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
plating installation of
ful life of the additional pump
num respectively. As a result
ator. Other yearly associated
osts, Rs 13,000.
9 10
184000 184000
40000 40000
224000 224000 Existin new pump
5 7 Petrol
-24000 -24000 2 3 Diesel
-10000 -10000
-12000 -12000
-13000 -13000
-100000 -100000 1 Calculation of Depreciation as per SLM
65000 65000 100000
22750 22750
42250 42250
100000 100000
142250 142250
500000
142250 642250
51296.776 206787.31
as per SLM
Star Ltd. is considering the replacement of its existing machine with the new machine which would cost Rs. 90 Lakhs. The co
increase to 1,70,000 units if the new machine is bought. The selling price of the Product would remain unchanged at Rs. 200
Lakhs and the total estimated working capital required for the new machine is Rs. 6 Lakhs which will get released fully at th
The cost structure would be as follows:
Fixed cost excluding depreciation is Rs 10 Lakhs which will remain the same even after the new machine is bought.
Variable cost details of producing one unit of product with the existing and the new machine:
Unit Cost (Rs.)
Existing New Machine
Particulars Machine
(1,60,000 (1,70,000 units)
units)
Direct Material 70 65
Direct Labour 45 40
Variable Overheads 55 50
The existing machine was bought 2 years ago for Rs. 70 lakhs, with total useful life of 7 years. It is having a Zero salvage valu
supplier of the new machine has offered to accept the existing old machine for Rs 40 Lakhs today.
The new machine has the life of 5 years and the salvage value of Rs 5 Lakhs at the end of its economic life.
Assume corporate tax rate at 40% and depreciation is to be charged on the straight line basis.
a) Determine the Net Cash Outflow required by the new machine.
b) If the company’s cost of capital is 10%, determine on the basis of NPV, whether the new machine should be purchased.
0 1
Incremental cash flows 1990000
Salvage value
Working capital recovered
Total cash flows -4900000 1990000
PV of Cash flow@10% 1809090.90909091
Total PV 8040402.7295701
NPV 3140402.7295701
NPV 3140402.73 =NPV(10%,E52:I52)+D52
1.61051
0.610510000000001
0.161051 3.7907867694085
ould cost Rs. 90 Lakhs. The company’s current production is 1,60,000 units and is expected to
remain unchanged at Rs. 200 per unit. Working capital invested for the existing machine is Rs. 3
h will get released fully at the end of the life of the machine.
machine is bought.
t is having a Zero salvage value after its useful life. Remaining useful life is of 5 years. The
ay.
onomic life.
2 3 4
1990000 1990000 1990000
52:I52)+D52
pt the proposal
=
Selling price 200
Working capital 3
Working capital 6
Fixed cost (excl 10 lakhs
variable cot
Existing 170
New machine 155
Existing machine
cost (2 years ago 70
useful life(existi 7
years
5
1990000
500000
300000
2790000
1732370.49134
Real World Company Ltd. has been manufacturing a product by using machine C for the last two years. Machine C
Now the management of the company is thinking to replace this machine either by Machine A or by Machine B. Fo
Machinery C A
Original Cost (Rs.) 3,750,000
Resale value now (Rs.) 2,850,000
Purchase price of new machinery (Rs.) 4,500,000
Annual fixed cost (including depreciation) (Rs.) 2,300,000 2,700,000
Variable conversion costs per unit of Finished Goods(Rs.) 3 1.5
Production per hour (unit) 200 200
Salvage value of machines after useful life (Rs.) 250,000 375,000
Working Capital Required (Released fully at the end) 1,000,000 1,200,000
The company charges depreciation using straight line method. This Depreciation will be allowed under Income Tax
It is anticipated that an additional cost of Rs.2,00,000 p.a. would be incurred on special advertising to sell the extra
Assume tax rate of 30% and cost of capital 10%.
Assume same rate of tax on Capital gains or capital losses.
Determine on the basis of NPV, whether the new machine should be purchased or not and if yes, then which Mach
Given :
Machinery C A
Original Cost (Rs.) 3,750,000
Resale value now (Rs.) 2,850,000
Purchase price (Rs.) 4,500,000
Annual fixed cost (including depreciation) (Rs.) 2,300,000 2,700,000
Variable conversion costs per unit of Finished Goods(Rs.) 3 1.5
Production per hour (unit) 200 200
Salvage value of machines after useful life (Rs.) 250,000 375,000
Working Capital Required (Released fully at the end) 1,000,000 1,200,000
Net Cash flow from sale of Machine C after considering Capital Gains/loss on sale:
Re-Sale value 2,850,000 Inflow
Book value of Machine C ₹ 2,750,000
Capital Gains 100,000
Tax on Capital Gain @30% 30000 Outflow
Net Cash inflow on sale of Machine C 2,820,000 Net Inflow
PV of Cash flows
Machine A
Year Incremental Cash Flows PVCF
Incremental yearly cash flows 1-5 years 45,000 170,585
Incremental Salvage 5th Year end 125,000 77,615
Incremental Working Capital released 5th Year end 200,000 124,184
Total PVCI 372,385
PVCO ₹ 1,880,000
Incremental NPV NPV=(PVCI - PVCO) ₹ -1,507,615
Machine B should be purchased as incremental NPV ₹ -3,875,393
st two years. Machine C was bought 2 years ago.
ine A or by Machine B. Following are the details given:
5,000,000
3,300,000
2.5
300
450,000
1,500,000
5,000,000
3,300,000
2.5
300
450,000
1,500,000
Machin B
0
20
0
0
0
3,300,000
200,000
3,500,000
-3,500,000
-1,050,000
-2,450,000
910,000
-1,540,000
450,000
1,500,000
-430,000
200,000
500,000
Machine B
₹ 2,180,000
₹ 500,000
₹ 2,680,000
Machine B
Incremental Cash Flows PVCF
-430,000 -1,630,038
200,000 124,184
500,000 310,461
Total PVCI -1,195,393
PVCO ₹ 2,680,000
₹ -3,875,393
Takata Limited is a leading automobile manufacturer in India.The company is having plans of manufacturing of Elec
However the entire operations of manufacturing EVs will be routed through a subisidiary company Sakata limited.
It has ambitious plans of affordable e-vehicles.The company will be undertaking assembly,manufacture,fabrication,
sales,after sales service ,marketing,promoting and/or servicing facilities
Accordingly, the initial capital investment of Rs.700 crs is estimated.
It includes cost of Land & factory building-Rs.300 crs,cost of Plant & Machinery-Rs.400 crs
The initial working capital requirement is estimated at Rs.100 crs.
The manufacuring costs for the EV are almost similar to petrol/deisel car. However the major component of manuf
The company at present is planning to import the batteries from Yagami Inc. ( a Japaneese company ) which attract
The project life is estimated as five years
The Sales volume and the estimated price per unit is as below
Year 1 2 3
Estimated Sale price (Amt 1,000,000 990,000 980,000
in Rs.per unit)
Estimated Sales volume 20,000 22,000 25,000
1) Initial Investment
Amt in Crs
Land & Factory Buildin 300
Plant & Machinery 400
Total 700
Capital Investment 700
Working capital 100
Total 800
2) WACC 9.00%
3)
Year 1 2 3
Sales Volume 20000 22000 25000
Sales price 1,000,000 990,000 980,000
Sales Value 20,000,000,000 21,780,000,000 24,500,000,000
Sales Value(Rs.in Cr) 2000 2178 2450
Less:
Material Cost 400 436 490
Labour cost 300 327 368
Battery Costs 600 653 735
Advertising 50 55 61
Fixed Overheads 5 5 5
Depreciation 175 131 98
PBT 470 571 694
Less:Tax 141 171 208
PAT 329 400 485
Add:Depreciation 175 131 98
Operating cash flows 504 531 584
Salvage value
Release of WC
Total Cash flows 504 531 584
PV of cash inflows ₹ 2,422.00
4) Depreciation
Year 1 2 3
Plant and machinery 400
Depreciation 100 75 56.25
Building 300.00
Depreciation 75.00 56.25 42.1875
Total Depreciation 175.00 131.25 98.44
Market value of building at the end of 5 the 50.00 Market value of plant and machinery at the
Book value at the end of 5th year 94.92 Book value at the end of 5th year
Capital Loss 44.92 Capital gain
Tax saving on gain 13.48 Tax payment on gain
Net inflow 63.48 Net Inflow
plans of manufacturing of Electric Vehicles(EV) .
iary company Sakata limited.
mbly,manufacture,fabrication,
4 5
950,000 960,000
27,000 30,000
ng to Rs.50 crs.
4 5
27000 30000
950,000 960,000
25,650,000,000 28,800,000,000
2565 2880
513 576
385 432
770 864
64 67
5 5
74 55
755 881
227 264
529 617
74 55
603 672
154.83
150
603 977
4 5
42.1875 31.640625
31.640625 23.73046875
73.83 55.37
Budget 2000000
Feasiblity set
Based on NPV Based on IRR
Project selected E,A,C,B A,C,E,D
Total outlay 2000000 1950000
NPV 1110000 1050000
The firm should select the proposal on the basis of feasibility set aooroach because it bring maximum
General Appoach
If project are indivisible decision based on Feasibilityapproach(NPV)
If project are divisible decision based on profitability Index
ollowing 6 proposals for which the necessary information is provided here under
•Indivisible Projects
•There are certain proposals which are
different proposal
within the budget constraints of ₹ 2000000
Based on PI
E,B,D,A
1700000
1010000
IRR
ain proposals which are indivisible.These proposals have a feature that either the proposal as a whole be taken in its tota
PV of cash inflows/Ou
Outlay Cummulativ
NPV
550000 550000 450000
250000 800000 160000
200000 1000000 100000
700000 1700000 300000
300000 2000000 120000
Total NPV 1130000
1. Aggregation of project or Feasibility Set approach
Under this approach the NPV of various proposal are put in different possible combinations and then that combination is selec
The following two points are worth
i) That total outlay of the combination is within the limits of capital rationing
ii) The total NPV of the combination is the highest among all the combinations
3. Profitability index
The PI is yet another way of ranking different proposals on the basis of the return per rupee invested in the project
Under this method,the PI has been defined as the ratio of PV of cash inflows to PV of cash outflows of a proposal
PI of different proposals may be calculated and placed in decreasing order.
The firm may start from the top and go on accepting the proposals subject to that
i) funds are available and
ii) the PI is more than 1
then that combination is selected which has the maximum total NPV
Assume that the projects are divisible for the purpose of investment in parts if required.Suggest the most favourab
d.Suggest the most favourable combination.Also calculate the total net present value as per the combination suggested.
PI Ranking
1.2 4.2
1.25 3.2
1.16 5.1
1.2 4.1
1.6 1
1.25 3.1
1.15 6
1.4 2
1.16 5.2
A Company aims to invest in a project which has a life of 3 years, with capital outlay of ₹ 650 lakhs.scrap value at en
Depreciation is on SLM.Proposed loan to be taken for the project is ₹ 500 lakhs.Loan is repayable in 3 equal annual
the end of each year.The applicable interest rate for similar projects is 11% p.a.However,as the company has a good
they are ready to give a benefit of 1% to the company.Tax rate applicable to the project is 50%.
The estimated EBITDA number for the three years ara as follows:
Year 1 2 3
EBITDA (₹ in lakhs) 450 500 550
Calculate Debt Service Coverage Ratio(DSCR) and Interest Coverage Ratio ( ICR) for each of the three year & give yo
f ₹ 650 lakhs.scrap value at end of third year is ₹ 50 lakhs.
s repayable in 3 equal annual instalments payable at
ver,as the company has a good relationship with the bank.
NPV basis Project B appears to be better but lives of two project is different .Therefore NPV can not be consider as
and decision should be based on equivalent annual method
7965.15
NPV ₹ 31,965.15
₹ 3,500,646.49
Project Y
-44000
16000
16000
16000
16000
16000
9634.48
ABC Ltd is evaluating the following two mutually proposal
Year X Y
0 -40000 -40000
1 15000 16000
2 15000 16000
3 15000 16000
4 20000 16000
5 16000
6 16000
7 19000
The decision may be taken on the basis of evaluation of both the options, for which the following steps may be requi
on is to be identified. In case of lease, the firm receives benefits from using the assets but has no claim on its residual salvage value, which
t associated with the ownership including the salvage value, if any. It may also incur the costs of maintaining the asset. The firm also has to p
ntified. The lease option requires only cash outflows in the form of the lease rental payment which is to be considered on an after tax basis. T
nder both the options. For this purpose, the present value of the stream of after tax cash outflows associated with each option must be calcu
bt. It may be noted that the lease payment and interest payment create similar commitment for the firm. Consequently, they should be tr
g and not the after tax cost of debt i.e., kd , should be used to discount the net cash flows under the buying option because funding for the
et if it is leased.
he higher NPV is superior and the other should be rejected.
residual salvage value, which is reserved for the lessor in most of the cases. The lessee firm has to make lease payments and also to meet
he asset. The firm also has to pay the interest on the funds borrowed to finance the asset, together with the repayment as per schedule. It m
sidered on an after tax basis. The after tax cash flow of lease rental may be taken as equal to the difference between the lease rental and the
with each option must be calculated. This is because the cash flows occur at different point of time. However, there is a difference of opinion
onsequently, they should be treated similarly, in terms of risk, for purposes of estimating discount rates. Because the discount rate for deb
option because funding for the purchase option in fact comes from mingled funds raised from different sources and cannot be associated
se payments and also to meet all or some of the maintenance expenses. The lease payments and all such expense payment associated wit
epayment as per schedule. It may be noted that in case of buying the assets, depreciation, maintenance expense, and interest are all deductib
tween the lease rental and the tax benefit. However, the cash flows associated with borrowings are more difficult to obtain due to the need t
here is a difference of opinion about the rate of discount being used to find out the present values. These are:
ause the discount rate for debt is the after tax cost of borrowings for the firm, the discount rate for the lease payment should also be afte
ces and cannot be associated with the anyone particular type of security. The same overall weighted average cost of capital should be use
pense payment associated with the leased assets are tax deductible for the lessee. The lessee cannot claim depreciation, as he is not the o
se, and interest are all deductible.
ult to obtain due to the need to identify both the interest and the depreciation associated with the asset. The calculation of cash outflow ass
calculation of cash outflow associated with borrowing has two steps. The first is to determine the annual interest components and the depre
est components and the depreciation and the second is to determine the cash outflow, which is equal to interest payment less tax shield on
est payment less tax shield on account of interest and depreciation plus principal repayment. The cash flows associated with the buying optio
ssociated with the buying option may be enumerated as follows:
A firm can purchase for ₹ 2500 an asset having life of 5 years after which its salvage value is ₹500.The firm provides
per year and will raise its expected operating expenses(not including depreciation) and interest by ₹ 700 per year.T
The firm can also lease the asset for a yearly rental of ₹ 650.The incremental revenue will be same at ₹1500 per yea
Two proposal
1. Buying option
2. Leasing option
To evaluate both option calculate NPV
PV of cash flows As the NPV of the leasing option is higher at ₹ 474 than the NPV of the buying option ,the firm should lea
e firm's expected revenue by ₹1500
1. The assets can be acquired on lease basis on a payment of annual lease rent of ₹ 15000 per annum for 4 years.
2. The assets is available of ₹ 50000 for which funds can be raised by the issue of 12% loan,which is to be repaid tog
The firm provides depreciation on straight line basis and the tax rate applicable is 30%.Which option should the firm
Year Installment Tas saving Tax saving on Dep Net cash oPV @ 8.4% PV of cash outflow
1 ₹ 16,462 1800 3750 ₹ 10,912 0.922509225092 ₹ 10,066.16
2 ₹ 16,462 1423.378 3750 ₹ 11,288 0.85102327038 ₹ 9,606.64
3 ₹ 16,462 1001.561 3750 ₹ 11,710 0.785076817694 ₹ 9,193.38
4 ₹ 16,462 529.1268 3750 ₹ 12,183 0.724240606729 ₹ 8,823.13
Total ₹ 37,689.31
e manufacturer.
Discount ra 8.40%
Check table
PVIFA (12% ₹ 3.0373
Calculation of Depreciation
Cost 50000
Life 4
Dep(SLM) 12500
V of cash outflow
The cash outflows are lower in case of lease option therefore the firm should lease the assets instaead of buying
e assets instaead of buying it from borrowed fund
ABC Ltd is considering to acquire an additional computer to supplement its time sharing services.It has two options
i) To purchase the computer for ₹ 22,00,000,and
ii) To lease the computer on an annual rental ( payable at the end of the year) of ₹ 500000 plus 10% of gross revenu
The revenues from time sharing services are estimated at ₹ 22,50,000, ₹ 25,00,000 and ₹ 27,50,000 for 3 years.The
Annual operating cost (excluding depreciation and lease rent) is estimated at ₹ 200000 per annum and an additiona
lessee in case of lease).Funds for purchase are to be acquired at the rate of 16% and are repayble ₹ 500000, ₹ 85000
ng services.It has two options:
0000 plus 10% of gross revenue from time sharing services.An amount of ₹ 600000 is also payable at the end of year 3.
d ₹ 27,50,000 for 3 years.The computer has a salvage of ₹ 10,00,000 at the end of 3rd year.
0 per annum and an additional revenue expense of ₹ 200000 is payable for trainning in the beginning of the 1st year(both these costs are
are repayble ₹ 500000, ₹ 850000 and ₹ 850000 at the end of 3 year respectively.The firm pays tax at the rate of 50% and provides deprecia
1st year(both these costs are to be borne by the
of 50% and provides depreciation at SLM.
PQR Ltd has a machine which has been in operation for 2 years and its remaining estimated useful life is 4 years wit
The management is considering a proposal to purchase an improved model to similar machine,Which gives increase
Particulars Existing New
Purchase price 240000 400000
Estimated life(years) 6 6
Salvage value NIL NIL
Annual operating hours 2000 2000
Selling price per unit(₹) 10 10
Material cost per unit(₹) 2 2
Output per hours (units) 15 30
Labour Cost per hour(₹) 20 40
Consumable stores per year(₹) 2000 5000
Repairs & Maintenance per year(₹) 9000 6000
Working capital(₹) 25000 40000
The Company follows the WDV method of depreciation @ 25% and its subject to 35% tax.Should the existing mach
Assume that the company's required rate of return is 15%.
Initial Outflows:
Purchase price of new machine 400000
Additional WC 15000
Sale value of old machine -100000
Saving on capital loss tax -12250 Capital Gain/loss
Net outflow 302750
Determination of NPV 1 2 3 4
Incremental cash inflows before tax 200000 200000 200000 200000
Less:-Incremental dep 66250 49687.5 37265.63 27949.22
PBT 133750 150312.5 162734.4 172050.8
Tax @ 35% 46812.5 52609.38 56957.03 60217.77
PAT 86937.5 97703.13 105777.3 111833
Depreciation 66250 49687.5 37265.63 27949.22
Cash inflow 153187.5 147390.6 143043 139782.2
TV only wc release 15000
CF 153187.5 147390.6 143043 154782.2
PV @ 15% 133206.5 111448.5 94053.07 88497.24
75000
225000
56250
Capital ex 600
Working ca 150
Additional 65.7516232431988
Total cost 815.751623243199
npv 271.8302
volving a capital expenditure of Rs. 600 Lakhs and working capital of Rs.150 lakhs. The capacity of the plants for an annual production of 1
f 40 percent. The annual fixed costs, excluding depreciation, are estimated to be Rs.480 Lakh per annum from the third year onwards for t
for working capital. Terminal value for the fixed assets may be taken at 10% and for the current assets at 100% for the purpose of your ca
tion calculation
Dep@33.33%WDV 307.55
199.98 400.02
133.3267 266.6933
88.88889 177.8044
59.26222 118.5422
39.51012 79.0321
26.3414 52.6907
PV Terminal value
106.0628 Sale of FA( 60
172.9188 BV 52.6907
184.5721 Capital Gai 7.309298
190.2462 Tax on CG 2.558254
161.9944 Relaese of 250 =150+100
138.872 307.4417
132.9156
1087.582
for an annual production of 12 lakh units and capacity utilization during 6-year life of the project is expected to be as indicated below:
m the third year onwards for the first and second year, it would be Rs. 240 lakh and Rs. 360 lakhs respectively. The average rate of depreci
0% for the purpose of your calculations, the recent amendments to tax laws with regard to balancing charge may be ignored. As a financia
d to be as indicated below:
y. The average rate of depreciation for tax purpose is 33.33% on the capital assets as per WDV. The rate of income tax may be taken at 35
e may be ignored. As a financial consultant what recommendation on the financial viability of the project would you make to the Trytonic L
ncome tax may be taken at 35%. The cost of capital is 15%
uld you make to the Trytonic Ltd.
A chemical company is considering replacing an existing machine with one costing Rs.65,000.The existing machine w
The new machine would cost Rs. 10,000 to install and would be depreciate over five years. The management believ
Year Existing M New Machine
(PAT)
1 2 2.16
2 1.5 1.5
3 1.8 2
4 2.1 2.4
5 2.2 2.3
If the company’s cost of capital is 15%, determine whether the new machine should be purchased
Existing New
Years PAT Dep Cash flow Year PAT Dep Cash flow Incrementa
1 200000 4000 204000 1 216000 14000 230000 26000
2 150000 4000 154000 2 150000 14000 164000 10000
3 180000 4000 184000 3 200000 14000 214000 30000
4 210000 4000 214000 4 240000 14000 254000 40000
5 220000 4000 224000 5 230000 14000 244000 20000
5 TV 15000
be purchased
initial cost
Year cost PV@10%
0 2 land 2
1 3 building 2.727273
2 10 machinery 8.264463
2 5 WC 4.132231
IC 17.12397
Cash inflows
Sales 20 Year CF PV@10%
VC 8 3 5 3.756574
FC 4 4 5 3.415067
Dep 2 5 5 3.104607
PBT 6 6 5 2.82237
Tax @50% 3 7 5 2.565791
PAT 3 TV 7 10 5.131581
Dep 2 TV PV 20.79599
Cash flow p.a 5 IC 17.12397
NPV 3.672022
ronic device which has good market further details are given below:
g of year 1] Means 0
will be operational for a period of 5 years. The annual working results (in Rs. lakhs) are estimated as follows:
accepted
Lawton Enterprises is evaluating a project with the following characteristics:
a. Fixed capital investment is $2,000,000.
b. The project has an expected six-year life.
c. The initial investment in net working capital is $200,000. At the end of each year, net working c
d. The fixed capital is depreciated 30 percent in Year 1, 35 percent in Year 2, 20 percent in Year 3
e. Sales are $1,200,000 in Year 1. They grow at a 25 percent annual rate for the next two years, an
f. Fixed cash operating expenses are $150,000 for Years 1–3 and $130,000 for Years 4–6.
g. Variable cash operating expenses are 40 percent of sales in Year 1, 39 percent of sales in Year 2
h. Lawton’ s marginal tax rate is 30 percent.
i. Lawton will sell its fixed capital investments for $150,000 when the project terminates and reca
j. The project’s required rate of return is 12 percent.
k. Calculate NPV
Working capital
WInitial cost years sales cumulative
0 200000
1 1200000 250000
Fixed capit 2000000 2 1500000 312500
Pv of wc 360012.4 3 1875000 343750
Total 2360012 4 2062500 378125
5 2268750 415937.5
6 2495625 415937.5
Cash flows
years sales Variable coFC PBDT Dep PBT Tax
1 1200000 480000 150000 570000 600000 -30000 -9000
2 1500000 585000 150000 765000 700000 65000 19500
3 1875000 712500 150000 1012500 400000 612500 183750
4 2062500 783750 130000 1148750 200000 948750 284625
5 2268750 862125 130000 1276625 100000 1176625 352987.5
6 2495625 948337.5 130000 1417288 0 1417288 425186.3
d of each year, net working capital must be increased so that the cumulative investment in net working capital is one-sixth of the
Year 2, 20 percent in Year 3, 10 percent in Year 4, 5 percent in Year 5, and 0 percent in Year 6.
ate for the next two years, and then grow at a 10 percent annual rate for the last three years.
0,000 for Years 4–6.
39 percent of sales in Year 2, and 38 percent in Years 3–6.
e project terminates and recapture its cumulative investment in net working capital. Income taxes will be paid on any gains.
WC PV@12@
200000 200000
50000 44642.86
62500 49824.62
31250 22243.13
34375 21845.93
37812.5 21455.83
0 0
PV 360012.4
PAT Cash flow Terminal CF PVCF Terminal value Calculation capital gain
-21000 579000 579000 516964.3 sale vaue 150000 BV
45500 745500 745500 594308 Tax on capi -45000 Sales Value
428750 828750 828750 589887.9 WC 415937.5 Capital gai
664125 864125 864125 549167.1 Total 520937.5
823637.5 923637.5 923637.5 524096.7
992101.3 992101.3 520937.5 1513039 766552.5
sum 3540977
IC 2360012
NPV 1180964 Accepted
g capital is one-sixth of the next year’s projected sales.
EBDT(Lease 240000
Dep 160000 (10L-2L)/5
PBT 80000
Tax @30% 24000
PAT 56000
Dep 160000
Cash inflo 216000
PVIFA @ 1 216000*PVIFA(12%,5)
-107905
: PVIFA = [1 - 1/(1 + k)n ] / k
1000000= A (1+i)*(1-(1+i)^n/i)
0.432573
OPTION I Leasing
OPTION 1 is better
PVIFA 2.9137
PV of 200 118416.06
500000=X*2.9137+118416
381583.94
X 130962 BEP
: PVIFA = [1 - 1/(1 + k)n ] / k
Calculation of installment
Loan amt 500000 Installment500000=A*PVIFA(16%,4)
Annual installmet 178686.3
PV of NCF
Year InstallmentTax benefitSalvage NCF PV@12@
1 178686.3 54250 124436.3 112714
2 178686.3 48723.57 129962.7 106630.3
3 178686.3 42312.91 136373.4 101349.7
4 178686.3 34876.54 -200000 -56190.24 -37825.49
282868.5
Not viable from lessor perspective
100
35
65 205962
100
Post tax cost of debt 8.40% Cosnsider as cost of capital
Cost of machine
Option I LEASING
PV@8.4%
178858
88260.20043479
86467.6762208
85074.77779297
84064.00685696
-52780.07676682
469944.5845387
Option I Take loan and Buy
1000000=A*PVIFA(13%,5)
PVIFA(13%,5) 3.5172
Year Annual Tax benefit Sale of equi Net cash out PV @12%
1 284317.1 98000 186317.07 166354.52714
2 284317.1 83103.5733 201213.497 160406.16797
3 284317.1 68475.61112 215841.459 153631.68737
4 284317.1 53820.26387 230496.807 146484.88757
5 284317.1 38852.83396 220296.859 25167.3771 14280.64563
641157.91568
Option I is better
Calculation of Dep (WDV) Net cash flow from sale of equipment
Cost Dep @15%WDV
1000000 150000 850000 Sale value 100000
850000 127500 722500 WDV(BV) 443705.3
722500 108375 614125 Capital Los -343705
614125 92118.75 522006.3
522006.3 78300.94 443705.3 Tax benefit on cap Loss 120296.9
Option II Lease
824586.6
year Cost Dep @15%WDV Sale value 0
1 1000000 150000 850000 WDV(BV) 443705.3
2 850000 127500 722500 Capital Los -443705
3 722500 108375 614125
4 614125 92118.75 522006.3 Tax benefit on cap Loss 155296.9
5 522006.3 78300.94 443705.3
due formula for PV calculation