5/6/23, 3:33 PM Skyscript.co.

uk :: View topic - Accurate Ayanamsa in Sidereal Astrology

From various online sources I have compiled a list that presents the zero ayanamsa date for numerous sidereal
zodiacs in progressive chronological order:

Babylonian, Kugler 1 143 CE

Fagan/Bradley 221 CE
Babylonian, Huber 229 CE
Mula/Chandra Hari (2003) 231 CE
Babylonian, Mercier 237 CE
Mula/Chandra Hari (1996) 238 CE
Babylonian, Kugler 2 243 CE
Dulakara 244CE
Lahiri 285 CE
Krishnamurti 292 CE
Babylonian, Kugler 3 305 CE
JN Bhasin 364 CE
Raman 397 CE
Yukteshwar 499 CE
Keralan/Vakya 522 CE
Ushashashi 559 CE
Sassanian 564 CE

I can see what you mean about Krisnamurti and Kugler III being quite close together. However, judging by its zero
ayanamsa with the tropical zodiac I dont think the Raman ayanamsa can be derived from a Sassanian ayanamsa
source as you suggest. Not clear about the Yukteshwar either.

I cant seem to find any reference online to the zero ayanamsa of the Thirakanitham zodiac.

I am intrigued by the historical issue of how popular Lahiri was as an ayanamsa before its adoption by the Indian
Calendar committee in 1956? How much is the predominance of Lahiri a product of post indepedence India?

https://skyscript.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7706 1/1